Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:15:44.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomarkers of copper status: a brief update

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Linda J. Harvey
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice, University of East Anglia, NorwichNR4 7TJ, United Kingdom Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Colney, NorwichNR4 7UA, United Kingdom
Harry J. McArdle*
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, AberdeenAB21 9SB, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author: Harry J. McArdle, fax +44 (0)1224 716622, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The essentiality of copper (Cu) in humans is demonstrated by various clinical features associated with deficiency, such as anaemia, hypercholesterolaemia and bone malformations. Despite significant effort over several decades a sensitive and specific Cu status biomarker has yet to be identified. The present article updates a comprehensive review recently published by the authors which assesses the reliability and robustness of current biomarkers and outlines the on-going search for novel indicators of status(1). The essential features of this earlier review are reiterated whilst considering whether there are other approaches, not yet tested, which may provide valuable information in the quest for an appropriate measure of copper status. Current biomarkers include a range of cuproenzymes such as the acute phase protein caeruloplasmin and Cu-Zn-superoxide dismutase all of which are influenced by a range of other dietary and environmental factors. A recent development is the identification of the Cu chaperone, CCS as a potential biomarker; although its reliability has yet to be established. This appears to be the most promising potential biomarker, responding to both Cu deficiency and excess. The potential for identifying a ‘suite’ of biomarkers using high-throughput technologies such as transcriptomics and proteomics is only now being examined. A combination of these technologies in conjunction with a range of innovative metal detection techniques is essential if the search for robust copper biomarkers is to be successful.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Copper is an essential micronutrient. As with iron (Fe), it can undergo valency changes, from Cu (II) to Cu (I), and this ability to either accept or donate electrons makes it an important part of many catalytic processes. Some enzymes and biological processes where it plays a central role are given in Table 1. Perturbations in cuproenzyme activities are largely responsible for the clinical features of Cu deficiency, whereas overt signs of Cu overload stem from intracellular oxidative damage, particularly in the liver. Not surprisingly, Cu deficiency has a wide spectrum of consequences. In different species, these are manifest in a different order, with cardiac effects being seen first in ruminants(Reference Frank, Wibom and Danielsson2, Reference Klevay3), for example, while changes in glucose and cholesterol metabolism are observed first in humans(Reference Klevay, Inman, Johnson, Lawler, Mahalko, Milne, Lukaski, Bolonchuk and Sandstead4Reference Klevay, Canfield, Gallagher, Henriksen, Lukaski, Bolonchuk, Johnson, Milne and Sandstead6).

Table 1 Biological processes involving Cu-binding enzymes or proteins

The importance of Cu means that it has been the subject of intensive investigation over several decades, but despite these efforts, the ideal biomarker remains elusive. A comprehensive review covering the search for Cu biomarkers has recently been published(Reference Danzeisen, Araya, Harrison, Keen, Solioz, Thiele and McArdle1), and this paper summarises some of that material, whilst also considering whether there are other methodological approaches, not yet tested, which may generate data suggesting potential new status indicators. Despite the unmistakeable importance of Cu in maintaining health, there remains on-going difficulty with setting dietary recommendations due to the lack of sensitive and specific Cu biomarkers. Whilst severe deficiency and toxicity are relatively easy to recognize due to the obvious clinical signs, it is virtually impossible to identify marginal deficiency.

Cu deficiency can result from both primary and secondary causes. Primary causes usually relate to diet, though there are inherited disorders of Cu metabolism, such as Menkes' and Wilson's diseases, that result in systemic deficiency and overload respectively(Reference Cox and Moore7). Despite the adverse health consequences of these rare diseases, both have provided fundamental information for understanding the molecular basis of human Cu metabolism and status. Dietary Cu bioavailability undoubtedly influences Cu status, and whilst factors that affect the former are not fully characterized, nutrient-Cu interactions play a significant role. In infants the interaction of Cu with Fe is potentially the most important, with a reduction in Cu absorption demonstrated in formula-fed infants given high dietary levels of Fe (10·8 mg/L) compared with lower levels (1·8 mg/L)(Reference Haschke, Ziegler, Edwards and Fomon8). Use of zinc (Zn) supplements also increases the risk of Cu deficiency, since Zn blocks Cu absorption by up-regulating metallothionein transcription in enterocytes(Reference Coyle, Philcox, Carey and Rofe9). Several case studies have been reported with Cu deficiency occurring as a result of taking high levels of over-the-counter Zn supplements(Reference Rowin and Lewis10). This interaction is exploited in the treatment of Wilson's disease patients who are given pharmacological doses of zinc to avoid the accumulation of copper in the tissues(Reference Brewer11, Reference Brewer, Dick, Johnson, Brunberg, Kluin and Fink12).

Growing children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to mild/moderate Cu deficiency. The developing fetus accumulates significant Cu stores during the third trimester to provide for the first 3–4 months of life when dietary Cu intake is minimal(Reference Gambling, Danzeisen, Fosset, Andersen, Dunford, Srai and McArdle13). In order to meet this demand, maternal Cu absorption is up-regulated as demonstrated by a stable isotope study conducted during pregnancy(Reference Turnlund, Swanson and King14). Studies in children have shown that malnutrition commonly induces Cu deficiency, though of course the symptoms are confounded by other nutritional problems(Reference Castillo-Duran and Uauy15, Reference Cordano16). Many foods high in Cu, especially offal such as liver, are less commonly consumed now, and others, such as chocolate are high in fat, and hence are not considered beneficial for a healthy lifestyle. These factors also contribute to the risk of deficiency, especially in young women.

Cu deficiency can also arise as a consequence of other disorders and treatments. For example, coeliac disease(Reference Goyens, Brasseur and Cadranel17), Crohn's disease(Reference Spiegel and Willenbucher18) and other gut absorption problems all increase the risk of Cu deficiency, as do diseases of the immune system, such as AIDS and autoimmune diseases(Reference Stambullian, Feliu and Slobodianik19). The long-term consumption of high doses of antacids and other cation chelating agents reduce absorption, whilst excessive losses of caeruloplasmin–bound Cu may be experienced by patients undergoing ambulatory peritoneal dialysis(Reference Becton, Schultz and Kinney20).

Cu overload is less frequent but it also carries risks. Brewer and colleagues have campaigned for some time about the dangers of high Cu intake, and suggested that it may be associated with an increased risk of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease(Reference Brewer21). It has also been implicated in the development of prion diseases such as Creutzfeld-Jacob disease and kuru(Reference Pauly and Harris22). The data are equivocal, but provide further support for the need for sensitive and specific biomarkers of Cu status.

Current biomarkers

Most current approaches use cuproenzymes of one form or another. Many studies have used caeruloplasmin (Cp), for example, which is an acute phase protein, affected by the age and hormonal status of the individual. Cu homeostasis is tightly maintained by changes in both the absorptive efficiency and biliary excretion in the gut. At low and high intakes the efficiency of absorption is up- and down-regulated, respectively(Reference Turnlund, Keyes, Anderson and Acord23), but is predominantly controlled via endogenous excretion(Reference Harvey, Majsak-Newman, Dainty, Lewis, Langford, Crews and Fairweather-Tait24); however this control mechanism is imperfect at extremes of intake. Consequently, intervention studies have shown little or no effect of marginal or short-term Cu deficiency on either plasma Cp concentrations or activity(Reference Milne, Johnson, Klevay and Sandstead25, Reference Milne and Nielsen26). Cp also does not respond to high levels of dietary copper at the level of either mRNA transcription or protein translation. However, its activity is reported to decrease in response to severe Cu deficiency, so that it has value for indicating moderate/severe Cu deficiency(Reference Feillet-Coudray, Coudray, Bayle, Rock, Rayssiguier and Mazur27).

Other cupro-enzymes that have been tested, with greater or lesser success, include (SOD1), platelet CCO, lysyl oxidase and peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (refer to recent review for further information(Reference Danzeisen, Araya, Harrison, Keen, Solioz, Thiele and McArdle1)).

Recent developments in copper biomarkers

More recently, several groups have examined the expression of CCS, a Cu ‘chaperone’. When Cu is taken up by cells, it binds to one of a series of proteins (termed chaperones) which transport the metal to its target protein (Table 1). One of these, CCS, has been shown to change expression in response to Cu levels in a variety of models. Initial experiments carried out in rat models demonstrated that CCS protein levels were inversely proportional to Cu status and, that regulation appeared to act through degradation by the 28S proteosome(Reference Bertinato, Iskandar and L'Abbé28). Subsequently it was shown that Cu deficiency induced by feeding rats increased Zn in the diet could also de detected by erythrocyte CCS(Reference Iskandar, Swist, Trick, Wang, L'Abbé and Bertinato29). Interestingly, at a high level of Zn intake, Cu deficiency was actually improved, and this was correlated with a decrease in CCS expression. These data have been confirmed in mice on Cu deficient diets, supporting the idea that CCS or possibly the CCS:SOD1 ratio is a good indicator of Cu deficiency. Whether it will act as a good indicator of Cu excess remains yet to be tested, although data obtained in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells suggest it may not be(Reference Southon, Burke, Norgate, Batterham and Camakaris30).

There is a body of evidence relating Cu deficiency to bone metabolism at all life stages. Skeletal defects such as osteopenia and spontaneous rib fractures are common features of Menkes disease in young children(Reference Ashkenazi, Levin, Djaldetti, Fishel and Benvenisti31Reference Al-Rashid and Spangler33), bone defects in pre-term infants respond to Cu supplementation(Reference Allen, Manoli and LaMont34), and Cu deficiency is reportedly a factor in age-related osteoporosis(Reference Conlan, Korula and Tallentire35). Urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyrodinoline (biomarkers of bone resorption) may be useful functional indicators of Cu status. Studies have demonstrated increased bone resorption associated with Cu depletion in adult males(Reference Baker, Harvey, Majask-Newman, Fairweather-Tait, Flynn and Cashman36), and a reduced rate of bone loss at the lumbar spine in Cu-supplemented middle-aged women(Reference Eaton-Evans, McIlwrath, Jackson, McCartney and Strain37). However, the complex nature of bone metabolism suggests that these biomarkers are non-specific for Cu status and will be influenced by a variety of nutritional and environmental factors. Other suggested Cu biomarkers include immune and blood lipoprotein biomarkers (further information can be found in the recent review(Reference Danzeisen, Araya, Harrison, Keen, Solioz, Thiele and McArdle1)).

The potential for multiple markers, using high throughput methods such as proteomics, transcriptomics and other methods is being investigated. The current state-of-the-art for these techniques in relation to human nutrition is reviewed elsewhere in this supplement. Whilst several papers have reported the identification of suites of potential biomarkers in experimental models, application to the human situation is only just beginning to be investigated. Proteomics technology offers significant potential for the identification of novel Cu biomarkers particularly in relation to the analysis of Cu-transporting or Cu-binding proteins in both healthy individuals and those with Cu-related conditions such as Menkes' or Wilson's disease. There are specific technological problems associated with the investigation of metalloproteins, including analysis at low concentrations and the inherent instability in response to environmental changes. Consequently, isolation of Cu-containing proteins in physiological conformations is particularly challenging. A comprehensive summary of the proteomics of metal transport can be found in the review by Kulkarni and colleagues(Reference Kulkarni, She, Smith, Roberts and Sarkar38). The ability of these techniques to screen the entire proteome of a cell may ultimately facilitate the identification of biomarker(s) with no obvious role in Cu metabolism. Potentially, a protein-product substantially down-stream from processes clearly related to Cu metabolism may provide an unexpected component of the ‘suite’ of Cu biomarkers. Ultimately, a combination of ‘standard’ proteomics and transcriptomics technologies in conjunction with a range of innovative metal detection techniques will be required to drive the search for robust copper biomarkers.

Conclusions

In the absence of robust sensitive and specific biomarkers, it is difficult to know whether Cu status, either in relation to deficiency or excess, is a significant public health problem. Nonetheless, given the intake data that suggest levels may be lower than optimal and given the serious consequences of deficiency, there is a strong argument for developing such markers of status. After many years of searching, we believe that success is not too far away. CCS and the other chaperones, high throughput methods and identification of mechanisms of regulation all add to our knowledge and will hopefully contribute, so that one day we will be able to accurately assess an individual's Cu status and determine whether he or she is at risk of deficiency or overload.

Acknowledgements

HJM is funded by the Scottish Government Rural and Environmental Analysis Directorate, the European Union (NuGO and EARNEST) and the International Copper Association.

LJH is funded by an EU FP6 Network of Excellence (EURRECA, grant no. FP6-036196-2) (UEA), and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (IFR).

References

1Danzeisen, R, Araya, M, Harrison, B, Keen, C, Solioz, M, Thiele, D & McArdle, HJ (2007) How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status? Br J Nutr 98, 676683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Frank, A, Wibom, R & Danielsson, R (2002) Myocardial cytochrome c oxidase activity in Swedish moose (Alces alces L.) affected by molybdenosis. Sci Total Environ 290, 121129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Klevay, LM (2000) Cardiovascular disease from copper deficiency – A history. J Nutr 130, 489S492S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Klevay, LM, Inman, L, Johnson, LK, Lawler, M, Mahalko, JR, Milne, DB, Lukaski, HC, Bolonchuk, W & Sandstead, HH (1984) Increased cholesterol in plasma in a young man during experimental copper depletion. Metabolism 33, 11121118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Reiser, S, Powell, A, Yang, CY & Canary, JJ (1987) Effect of copper intake on blood cholesterol and its lipoprotein distribution in man. Nutr Rep Int 36, 641649.Google Scholar
6Klevay, LM, Canfield, WK, Gallagher, SK, Henriksen, LK, Lukaski, HC, Bolonchuk, W, Johnson, LK, Milne, DB & Sandstead, HH (1986) Decreased glucose tolerance in two men during experimental copper depletion. Nutr Rep Int 33, 371382.Google Scholar
7Cox, DW & Moore, SD (2002) Copper transporting P-type ATPases and human disease. J Bioerg Biomembr 34, 333338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Haschke, F, Ziegler, EE, Edwards, BB & Fomon, SJ (1986) Effect of iron fortification of infant formula on trace mineral absorption. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 5, 768773.Google ScholarPubMed
9Coyle, P, Philcox, JC, Carey, LC & Rofe, AM (2002) Metallothionein: the multipurpose protein. Cell Mol Life Sci 59, 2747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Rowin, J & Lewis, SL (2005) Copper deficiency myeloneuropathy and pancytopenia secondary to overuse of zinc supplementation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76, 750751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Brewer, GJ (2001) Zinc acetate for the treatment of Wilson's disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2, 14731477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Brewer, GJ, Dick, RD, Johnson, VD, Brunberg, JA, Kluin, KJ & Fink, JK (1998) Treatment of Wilson's disease with zinc: XV long-term follow-up studies. J Lab Clin Med 132, 264278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Gambling, L, Danzeisen, R, Fosset, C, Andersen, HS, Dunford, S, Srai, SKS & McArdle, HJ (2003) Iron and copper interactions in development and the effect on pregnancy outcome. J Nutr 133, 1554S1556S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Turnlund, JR, Swanson, CA & King, JC (1983) Copper absorption and retention in pregnant women fed diets based on animal and plant proteins. J Nutr 113, 23462352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Castillo-Duran, C & Uauy, R (1988) Copper deficiency impairs growth of infants recovering from malnutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 47, 710714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Cordano, A (1998) Clinical manifestations of nutritional copper deficiency in infants and children. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 1012S1016S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Goyens, P, Brasseur, D & Cadranel, S (1985) Copper deficiency in infants with active celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 4, 677680.Google ScholarPubMed
18Spiegel, JE & Willenbucher, RF (1999) Rapid development of severe copper deficiency in a patient with Crohn's disease receiving parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 23, 169172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Stambullian, M, Feliu, S & Slobodianik, NH (2007) Nutritional status in patients with HIV infection and AIDS. Br J Nutr 98, Suppl. 1, S140S143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Becton, DL, Schultz, WH & Kinney, TR (1986) Severe neutropenia caused by copper deficiency in a child receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Pediatr 108, 735737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Brewer, GJ (2007) Iron and copper toxicity in diseases of aging, particularly atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. Exp Biol Med 232, 323335.Google ScholarPubMed
22Pauly, PC & Harris, DA (1998) Copper stimulates endocytosis of the prion protein. J Biol Chem 273, 3310733110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Turnlund, JR, Keyes, WR, Anderson, HL & Acord, LL (1989) Copper absorption and retention in young men at three levels of dietary copper by use of the stable isotope 65Cu. Am J Clin Nutr 49, 870878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Harvey, LJ, Majsak-Newman, G, Dainty, JR, Lewis, DJ, Langford, NJ, Crews, HM & Fairweather-Tait, SJ (2003) Adaptive responses in men fed low- and high-copper diets. Br J Nutr 90, 161168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Milne, DB, Johnson, PE, Klevay, LM & Sandstead, HH (1990) Effect of copper intake on balance, absorption and status indices of copper in men. Nutr Res 10, 975986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Milne, DB & Nielsen, FH (1996) Effects of a diet low in copper on copper-status indicators in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 63, 358364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Feillet-Coudray, C, Coudray, C, Bayle, D, Rock, E, Rayssiguier, Y & Mazur, A (2000) Response of diamine oxidase and other plasma copper biomarkers to various dietary copper intakes in the rat and evaluation of copper absorption with a stable isotope. Br J Nutr 83, 561568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Bertinato, J, Iskandar, M & L'Abbé, MR (2003) Copper deficiency induces the upregulation of the copper chaperone for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase in weanling male rats. J Nutr 133, 2831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Iskandar, M, Swist, E, Trick, KD, Wang, B, L'Abbé, MR & Bertinato, J (2005) Copper chaperone for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase is a sensitive biomarker of mild copper deficiency induced by moderately high intakes of zinc. Nutr J 4, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Southon, A, Burke, R, Norgate, M, Batterham, P & Camakaris, J (2004) Copper homoeostasis in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells. Biochem J 383, 303309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Ashkenazi, A, Levin, S, Djaldetti, M, Fishel, E & Benvenisti, D (1973) The syndrome of neonatal copper deficiency. Pediatrics 52, 525533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Seely, JR, Humphrey, GB & Matter, BJ (1972) Copper deficiency in a premature infant fed on iron-fortified formula. N Engl J Med 286, 109110.Google Scholar
33Al-Rashid, RA & Spangler, J (1971) Neonatal copper deficiency. N Engl J Med 285, 841843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Allen, TM, Manoli, A II & LaMont, RL (1982) Skeletal changes associated with copper deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 168, 206210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Conlan, D, Korula, R & Tallentire, D (1990) Serum copper levels in elderly patients with femoral-neck fractures. Age Ageing 19, 212214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Baker, A, Harvey, L, Majask-Newman, G, Fairweather-Tait, S, Flynn, A & Cashman, K (1999) Effect of dietary copper intakes on biochemical markers of bone metabolism in healthy adult males. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 408412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Eaton-Evans, J, McIlwrath, EM, Jackson, WE, McCartney, H & Strain, JJ (1996) Copper supplementation and the maintenance of bone mineral density in middle-aged women. J Trace Elem Exp Med 9, 8794.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Kulkarni, PP, She, YM, Smith, SD, Roberts, EA & Sarkar, B (2006) Proteomics of metal transport and metal-associated diseases. Chem Eur J 12, 24102422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Biological processes involving Cu-binding enzymes or proteins