Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T12:16:56.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inventions of Nemesis: Utopia, Indignation, and Justice By Douglas Mao, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020. 284 pp. ISBN: 9780691212302 £20.99

Review products

Inventions of Nemesis: Utopia, Indignation, and Justice By Douglas Mao, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2020. 284 pp. ISBN: 9780691212302 £20.99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2022

Ruth Houghton
Ruth Houghton*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, UK
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Encounters with Books from Other Disciplines
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 19 , Special Issue 1: Algorithmic Law in Context , March 2023 , pp. 91 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Capers, B (2022) Afrofuturism and the law. Critical Analysis of Law 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hexter, J (1952) More's Utopia: The Biography of an Idea. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Houghton, R and O'Donoghue, A (2020) ‘Ourworld’: a feminist approach to global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism 9, 38–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imarisha, W and brown am (eds) (2015) Octavia's Brood: Science Fiction Stories from Social Justice Movements. California: AK Press.Google Scholar
Jacoby, R (2005) Picture Imperfect: Utopian Thought for an Anti-utopian Age. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, F (2009) Valences of the Dialectic. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Johns, A (2010) Feminism and utopianism. In Claeys, G (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, R (2013) Utopia as Method. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lino, D (2018) The rule of law and the rule of empire: A.V. Dicey in imperial context. Modern Law Review, 81, 739–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, C and Westmarland, N (2019) Kaleidoscopic justice: sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies 28, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moylan, T (2022) Becoming Utopian: The Culture and Politics of Radical Transformation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nicholson, M (2019) Re-situating Utopia. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rasulov, A (2018) The utopians. In d'Aspremont, J and Singh, S (eds), Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 879–899.Google Scholar
Rasulov, A (2021) ‘From the wells of disappointment’: the curious case of the international law of democracy and the politics of international legal scholarship. European Journal of International Law 32, 17–47.Google Scholar
Sarat, A, Douglas, L and Umphrey, MM (eds) (2014) Law and the Utopian Imagination. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, Stanford Law Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suvin, D (1998) Positions and Presuppositions in Science Fiction. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
van der Welt, J (2014) Law, utopia, event: a constellation of two trajectories. In Sarat, A, Douglas, L and Umphrey M, Merrill (eds), Law and the Utopian Imagination. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, Stanford Law Books, pp. 60–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar