Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:18:22.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A prospective evaluation of the availability and utility of the Ambulance Call Record in the emergency department – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2016

Natalie Cram ,
Shelley McLeod ,
Michael Lewell  and
Matthew Davis

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 79
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2016 

doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.362

In the original publication of “A prospective evaluation of the availability and utility of the Ambulance Call Record in the emergency department,” author Shelley McLeod’s hospital affiliation, the Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital, was incorrectly listed as being in New York. Dr. McLeod is in fact affiliated with Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Ontario.

The publisher regrets this error.

References

Cram, N, McLeod, S, Lewell, M, Davis, M. A prospective evaluation of the availability and utility of the Ambulance Call Record in the emergency department. CJEM 2016, epub, 1–7. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.362.Google ScholarPubMed