There were errors in the published version of Table 7 of Torku et al. (Reference Torku, Chan and Yung2020). The correct version of the table is below.
Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Dutka, Grzegorz
Gawron, Grzegorz
and
Rojek-Adamek, Paulina
2021.
CREATIVITY BASED ON NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN DESIGN OF AGE-FRIENDLY CITIES: POLISH SENIORS ABOUT THEIR NEEDS – RESEARCH REFLECTION.
Creativity Studies,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
218.
Teh, Pei-Lee
Lee, Shaun Wen Huey
Liew, Ewilly Jie Ying
Lee, Elizabeth
and
Ayub, Qasim
2021.
Are Older Adults Different in Their Perspectives on Age-friendly City? Evidence From Sunway City.
p.
910.
Kim, Kyeongmo
Buckley, Tommy
Burnette, Denise
Kim, Seon
Cho, Sunghwan
and
Meeks, Suzanne
2022.
Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey.
The Gerontologist,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 1,
p.
e17.
Murtagh, Brendan
Cleland, Claire
Ferguson, Sara
Ellis, Geraint
Hunter, Ruth
Rodriguez Añez, Ciro Romelio
Becker, Leonardo Augusto
Hino, Adriano Akira Ferreira
and
Reis, Rodrigo Siqueira
2022.
Age-friendly cities, knowledge and urban restructuring.
International Planning Studies,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
62.
Torku, Alex
Chan, Albert Ping Chuen
and
Yung, Esther Hiu Kwan
2022.
Age-friendly cities and communities: a review and future directions – CORRIGENDUM.
Ageing and Society,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 5,
p.
1234.
Guillemot, Jonathan R.
and
Warner, Mildred E.
2023.
Age-Friendly Cities in Latin America: A Human Ecological Framework.
Geriatrics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
46.
Debrah, Justice Kofi
Wahaj, Zujaja
Sadaf, Lubaba
and
Dinis, Maria Alzira Pimenta
2023.
Assessment of biomedical waste handling in Ghana.
International Journal of Environmental Studies,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 3,
p.
562.