Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:47:09.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalent high-risk HPV infection and vaginal microbiota in Nigerian women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2015

E. O. DARENG*
Affiliation:
Office of Strategic Information, Research and Training, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Cambridge, UK
B. MA
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
A. O. FAMOOTO
Affiliation:
Office of Strategic Information, Research and Training, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria
S. N. AKAROLO-ANTHONY
Affiliation:
Office of Strategic Information, Research and Training, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
R. A. OFFIONG
Affiliation:
University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Nigeria
O. OLANIYAN
Affiliation:
National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria
P. S. DAKUM
Affiliation:
Office of Strategic Information, Research and Training, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria
C. M. WHEELER
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Centre, Albuquerque, NM, USA
D. FADROSH
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
H. YANG
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
P. GAJER
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
R. M. BROTMAN
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
J. RAVEL
Affiliation:
Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
C. A. ADEBAMOWO
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Institute of Human Virology and Greenebaum Cancer Centre, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr E. O. Dareng, Strangeways Research Laboratory, 2 Worts’ Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this study, we evaluated the association between high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and the vaginal microbiome. Participants were recruited in Nigeria between April and August 2012. Vaginal bacterial composition was characterized by deep sequencing of barcoded 16S rRNA gene fragments (V4) on Illumina MiSeq and HPV was identified using the Roche Linear Array® HPV genotyping test. We used exact logistic regression models to evaluate the association between community state types (CSTs) of vaginal microbiota and hrHPV infection, weighted UniFrac distances to compare the vaginal microbiota of individuals with prevalent hrHPV to those without prevalent hrHPV infection, and the Linear Discriminant Analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm to characterize bacteria associated with prevalent hrHPV infection. We observed four CSTs: CST IV-B with a low relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. in 50% of participants; CST III (dominated by L. iners) in 39·2%; CST I (dominated by L. crispatus) in 7·9%; and CST VI (dominated by proteobacteria) in 2·9% of participants. LEfSe analysis suggested an association between prevalent hrHPV infection and a decreased abundance of Lactobacillus sp. with increased abundance of anaerobes particularly of the genera Prevotella and Leptotrichia in HIV-negative women (P < 0·05). These results are hypothesis generating and further studies are required.

Type
Original Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide, with an estimated 528 000 new cases and 266 000 deaths in 2012 [Reference Ferlay1]. It is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in women living in Africa with 99 000 cases in 2012 and probably the commonest cancer in women living with HIV in Africa [Reference Parkin2]. Cervical cancer incidence in developed countries has fallen by about 80% over the last two decades and may continue to decrease because of effective screening and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. However, rates have largely remained stable in developing countries [Reference Jemal3, Reference Jedy-Agba4].

Persistent infection of the cervix uteri by any of 15–18 HPV types classified by IARC as high-risk (hr) HPV types is the main risk factor for cervical cancer [Reference Galloway5]. Some 5–15% of women are infected by HPV each year and this correlates with sexual debut, number of sexual partners and age [Reference Galloway5, Reference Schmeink6]. Approximately 10% of infected women fail to clear the virus leading to persistent infection [Reference Galloway5Reference Rodriguez7]. In addition, even in women who seem to have cleared the infection, there is some evidence to suggest that there may be redetection of prior infections at a later age [Reference Rositch8]. Factors that are associated with persistence of hrHPV remain largely unknown.

Although a causal role for hrHPV is well established in cervical carcinogenesis, relatively little is known about biological factors that influence the risk of persistence of hrHPV [Reference Clarke9]. Disturbances in the vaginal microenvironment through vaginal douching practices [Reference Herrero10], sexually transmitted infections [Reference de Sanjose11, Reference Schmauz12] and bacterial vaginosis (BV) [Reference Gillet13] have been shown to be likely co-factors of persistence in HPV infection. While the mechanisms of these associations are not completely understood, the vaginal bacterial commensal communities (the microbiota) and the host adaptive/innate immune systems are probably involved.

The vaginal microbiota play a major role in preventing colonization and over-growth of microorganisms such as those associated with BV [Reference Hillier14, Reference Puapermpoonsiri15] and urinary tract infections [Reference Gupta16], as well as lowering the risk of acquisition and transmission of sexually transmitted infections, including HIV [Reference Gray17], Herpes simplex virus, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Trichomonas vaginalis and Chlamydia trachomatis [Reference Clarke9, Reference Taha18, Reference Martin19]. Vaginal microbial dysbiosis, as in BV, could lead to increased susceptibility to hrHPV infection and reduced ability of the immune system to clear the infection [Reference Rodriguez-Cerdeira, Sanchez-Blanco and Alba20, Reference Ma, Forney and Ravel21]. The primary mechanism by which the microbiota protects the female reproductive tract is hypothesized to be through production of lactic acid by Lactobacillus sp. via the anaerobic metabolisms of host-associated degradation products of glycogen stored in vaginal mucosal cells [Reference Boskey22Reference Spear24]. Other research groups have been investigating how vaginal lactobacilli have cytotoxic effects on cervical tumour cells using in vitro models [Reference Motevaseli25].

Previous studies examining the link between the vaginal microbiota, hrHPV infection and its role in cervical carcinogenesis have typically used surrogates of vaginal microbiota status such as vaginal pH, Amsel or Nugent diagnosis of BV [Reference Nugent, Krohn and Hillier26, Reference Amsel27] and cervical inflammation, or culture-dependent techniques [Reference Clarke9, Reference Gillet13, Reference Castle28]. Two recent studies utilized 16S rRNA gene analysis to evaluate the relationship between vaginal bacterial communities and HPV infection in a community of Korean and American women, respectively [Reference Lee29, Reference Brotman30]. Regarding the Korean women, the authors found that HPV-positive women had significantly higher microbial diversity with a lower proportion of Lactobacillus sp. than HPV-negative women. Additionally, they observed that HPV infection was strongly associated with Fusobacteria. In the study of 32 reproductive age women in the United States who were followed prospectively for 16 weeks, the authors found that community state type (CST) was associated with changes in HPV status and a low lactobacillus community with high proportions of the genera Atopobium had the slowest rate of HPV clearance. Another recent study in a Rwandan population utilized phylogenetic microarray methods and observed that women with microbiota dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus were less likely to have prevalent hrHPV infection compared to women with more diverse microbiota comprised of mixtures of anaerobes including species of the genera Gadnerella, Atopobium and Prevotella [Reference Borgdorff31].

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the composition of the vaginal microbiota and prevalent hrHPV infection in women attending a cervical cancer screening programme in Abuja, Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data and sample collection

The study population for this analysis has been previously described [Reference Akarolo-Anthony32, Reference Famooto33]. In summary, 278 women were recruited in Abuja, Nigeria between April and August 2012. Trained nurses administered questionnaires to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics and other risk factors. They conducted detailed gynaecological examinations and collected biological specimens. Mid-vaginal swabs and exfoliated ecto-cervical cells were collected from all participants using the Elution Swab system (Copan, Italy) and stored in 1 ml Amies' Transport media (Copan) using common clinical practices. The swabs were immediately frozen and stored at −80 °C until shipped to the University Of Maryland School Of Medicine, Institute for Genome Sciences where they were processed. Participants' HIV statuses were confirmed from their medical records. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Institute of Human Virology, Nigeria [Reference Harris34].

Vaginal microbiota characterization

Whole genomic DNA extraction from vaginal swabs

The swab suspensions were thawed on ice and vortexed vigorously to ensure an even distribution of cells. A total of 500 μl cell suspension was added to a 2 ml Fast Prep Lysing Matrix tube (Bio 101) containing 500 μl ice-cold PBS. Enzymatic lysis was initiated by adding 5 μl lysostaphin (4000 U/ml in 20 mm sodium acetate, pH 4·5), 13 μl mutanolysin (11·7 U/μl) and 3·2 μl lysozyme (1 mg/ml) and incubated at 37 °C for 37 min. Following this incubation, 10 μl Proteinase K (20 mg/ml), 50 μl of 10% SDS and 2 μl RNase A (10 mg/ml) were added. The mixture was incubated at 55 °C for 45 min. Samples were then subjected to mechanical lysis by bead beating in a Fast Prep 24 machine (MPBio, USA) at 6·0 m/s for 40 s. The lysates were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 60 s to pellet the beads and filtered using the Zymo-Spin IV spin columns (Zymo Research, USA). DNA purification was performed on 500 μl lysate using the Qiagen Virus/Bacteria kit on a QIAsymphony SP instrument (Qiagen, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Total genomic DNA quality was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% E-gel, Invitrogen, USA).

DNA amplification and sequencing of barcoded 16S rRNA gene fragments

Universal primers 515 F and 806R were used for PCR amplification of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene according to the procedure of Caporaso et al. [Reference Caporaso35]. The 806R primer included a unique 12 bp sequence tag to barcode each sample. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA genes was amplified in 96-well microtitre plates using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher, USA) and 50 ng template DNA in a total reaction volume of 50 μl. Reactions were run in a DNA Engine Tetrad 2 thermo cycler (Bio-Rad, USA) using the following cycling parameters: 30 s at 98 °C, followed by 25 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 15 s at 55 °C, and 15 s at 72 °C, with a final step of 10 min at 72 °C. Negative controls without template were included for each barcoded primer pair. Amplicons were confirmed by gel electrophoresis (2% E-gel) and quantified using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA assay (Life Technology, USA). Equimolar amounts (100 ng) of each of 278 PCR amplicons were mixed in a single tube. Primers and reaction buffer were removed from the pool of samples using the AMPure kit (Agencourt, USA). The purified amplicon mixture was sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (Illumina, USA) combined with 50% of control Phi-X control library using a 250 bp paired-end protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

Sequence analysis

The QIIME software package (qiime.org\) was used to perform quality control for the sequence reads using the following criteria: (1) having minimum and maximum length of 75% of original read length after filtering; (2) having an average quality score of q20 over a sliding window of 25 bp. If quality dropped below q20, the read was trimmed at the first base pair of the window and then reassessed for length; and (3) having a perfect match to a barcode sequence after autocorrection in QIIME. Sequences were binned by samples using the sample-specific barcode sequence. Paired reads were assembled using PANDAseq [Reference Masella36]. Using the UCLUST package high-quality reads were first de-replicated using 99% similarity and screened for potential chimeric sequences using UCHIME [Reference Edgar37]. Chimeric sequences were removed prior to taxonomic assignments. Each processed 16S rRNA gene sequence was classified using the RDP Naive Bayesian Classifier [Reference Wang38] trained with the Greengene 16S rRNA database [Reference McDonald39]. A de novo phylogeny was built on the filtered alignment using the RAxML method [Reference Stamatakis40], based on which the weighted UniFrac distance metric [Reference Lozupone and Knight41] was calculated and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) was used to perform principal coordinates reduction to assess the difference in overall microbial community composition [Reference Caporaso42].

CST assignments

Using the method described previously by Gajer et al., the sample from each participant was assigned to a vaginal CST using hierarchical clustering based on the Jensen–Shannon distances between all pairs of community states and Ward linkage [Reference Gajer43]. Heat maps of the relative abundance of the bacterial taxa found in each vaginal bacterial community was generated using the vegan package in R [Reference Oksanen44].

Detection of HPV by genotyping

HPV DNA genotyping was performed using the Roche Linear Array® HPV genotyping test (HPV LA; Roche Diagnostics, USA) using the manufacturer's recommendations as described previously [Reference Famooto33, Reference Castle45]. This genotyping test qualitatively detects 37 high- and low-risk HPV genotypes (13 hrHPV types: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68; and 24 low-risk HPV types: 6, 11, 26, 40, 42, 53, 54, 55, 61, 62, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 81, 82, 83, 84, IS39, CP6108) [Reference Bouvard46].

Statistical analysis

The association between specific bacterial taxa and hrHPV infection was evaluated using the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) algorithm [Reference Segata47]. LEfSe performs two-stage comparisons, when the P value of the first comparison is <0·05, only then does it report LDA. The higher the LDA score for a taxon, the more significant the relationship is [Reference Segata47, Reference Fisher48]. LEfSe was adapted to quantitatively characterize the biomarker phylotypes that could explain the differences observed between two biological conditions [Reference Segata47]. The alpha value for the non-parametric factorial Kruskal–Wallis sum-rank test [Reference Kruskal and Wallis49] was 0·05, the threshold on the logarithmic LDA model score for discriminative features was 2·0. Weighted UniFrac distances, which measure the distance between vaginal communities using phylogenetic information to reveal patterns of sample aggregation [Reference Lozupone and Knight41], were used to compare the vaginal microbiota of individuals with and without prevalent hrHPV infection. The taxonomic ranks of the identified taxa in LEfSe are generated using Ribosomal Dataset Project (RDP) taxonomy [Reference Cole50] that were further marked on a cladogram representing the taxonomic hierarchical structure from genera to phylum.

Student's t test and χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations between continuous/categorical variables and prevalent hrHPV infection status, respectively. In evaluating the relationship between vaginal bacterial community and hrHPV infection, we utilized different biostatistical models and bioinformatics tools. In model A, we examined the association between vaginal CSTs (as a predictor with four categories – CST I, CST III, CST IV-B and CST VI with CST IV-B being set as the reference category) and prevalent hrHPV infection using an exact logistic regression model, and in model B, we used exact logistic regression to examine the association between each CST and prevalent hrHPV infection by dichotomizing the CSTs into a CST of interest and all other CSTs combined. For example, in evaluating the effect of CST I, the CSTs were dichotomized into CST I and all other CSTs combined. This was repeated for CST III, CST IV-B and CST VI. Because there are numerous stratifications in CSTs, we used this binary approach in order to detect additional signals in the data. We also tested for interactions on HIV status and conducted stratified analysis of the association between hrHPV infection and vaginal microbiome by HIV infection status.

For the multivariable logistic regression model (model C), we included predictors that had P ⩽ 0·10 in univariate analyses or were known confounders. We set statistical significance at P ⩽ 0·05. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata statistical software v. 12 (StataCorp, USA).

Ethics statement

The study was conducted according to the Nigerian National Code for Health Research Ethics and the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007-01/08/2014) and the University of Maryland IRB (HCR-HP- 00 051 495-2). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment in the study.

RESULTS

A total of 278 women participated in the study, of which 66 (23·7%) tested positive for hrHPV. We were unable to ascertain the HIV status of 16 participants and these participants were excluded from all analysis in which the outcome variable was HIV status. The prevalence of hrHPV infection was significantly higher in HIV-positive (35·1%) compared to HIV-negative (10·8%) women (P < 0·001). Women with hrHPV infection were also more likely to have had ⩽12 years of education compared to hrHPV-negative women (P = 0·01) (Table 1). hrHPV-positive women were slightly younger with mean (s.d.) age of 34·2 (7·3) years compared to hrHPV-negative women [37·9 (7·8) years] (P = 0·001). Some 38·2% of the participants were aged ⩾40 years. Median number of live births, age at sexual debut, prevalence of smoking, contraceptive use, having used vaginal douching in the 3 months preceding study participation and frequency of vaginal intercourse were not statistically significantly different between hrHPV-positive and hrHPV-negative women.

Table 1. Characteristics of study participants, by hrHPV status

hrHPV, High-risk human papillomavirus; IQR, interquartile range.

Values given are n (%) unless stated otherwise.

* Fisher's exact test was used for age, vaginal bacterial community, education, smoking and contraceptive use, and Pearson's χ 2 test was used for HIV status, vaginal douching within last 3 months and frequency of intercourse in the past year

HIV status was not confirmed for 16 participants. Age variable was missing for three participants; frequency of intercourse in past year was missing for one participant.

Sixty-two participants reported contraceptive use for >5 years.

Characterization of the vaginal microbiota in study participants

We identified four vaginal CSTs, three of which were previously characterized, and were labelled according to the described nomenclature [Reference Gajer43, Reference Ravel51]. Figure 1 shows the bacterial taxa abundance in each of the 278 participants in the study by hrHPV and HIV status. The major vaginal CSTs identified were CST III dominated by L. iners and CST IV-B, which lacks significant numbers of lactobacillus and is composed of a diverse array of facultative and strictly anaerobic bacteria such as Atopobium and Gardnerella vaginalis among others. Some CSTs were less common, including CST I (dominated by L. crispatus) and CST VI, a novel CST dominated by members of the phylum proteobacteria described for the first time in this study. Communities dominated by L. jensenii or L. gasseri were not observed in this population, suggesting they were under-represented compared to a large study of North American women [Reference Ravel51]. CST IV-B was the most prevalent CST detected, regardless of hrHPV and HIV status, with 139 (50%) participants having this type of vaginal microbiota. CST III was found in 109 (39·2%) participants, CST I in 22 (7·9%) participants and the proteobacteria-dominated CST VI in eight (2·9%) participants (Table 2). This distribution pattern was the same when participants were categorized by hrHPV status. A UniFrac analysis (Fig. 2) showed that all CSTs had distinct structures in terms of sample distance and distribution.

Fig. 1. Heat map of relative abundance for the 50 most abundant bacterial taxa found in the vaginal bacterial communities of all participants in the study. Ward linkage clustering was used to cluster samples based on their Jensen–Shannon distance calculated in the vegan package in R [Reference Oksanen44]. Identified community state types (CSTs) are labelled as I, III, and IV, according to the previous naming convention [Reference Ravel51]. hrHPV, High-risk human papillomavirus.

Fig. 2. Weighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot comparing sample distribution belonging to different community state types (CSTs). See Figure 1 for sample CST assignments used in this figure.

Table 2. Association between vaginal bacterial community state types (CSTs) and HIV, Abuja, Nigeria 2012

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

* Sixteen participants with unconfirmed HIV status were excluded from these analysis.

Exact logistic regression model.

The average abundances of the dominant bacteria in the communities were: L. crispatus in CST I (66·5%); L. iners in CST III (64·3%); G. vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae in CST IV-B (20·7% and 6·5%, respectively); and Proteobacteria in CST VI (77·5%) (Supplementary Table S1). CST assignments aside, L. iners and L. crispatus were detected in 97·8% and 69·4% of the participants, respectively.

Considering that CST VI has not been previously described in the literature, further evaluation of this community state was required; however, due to the limited number of participants with this CST, only exploratory analysis of this CST could be conducted at this time. From exploratory analysis, there appeared to be a trend towards an association between this CST and post-menopausal state (Fisher's exact P = 0·02) and most of the participants with this CST were HIV positive (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of individuals in community state type (CST) VI compared to other CSTs

IQR, Interquartile range.

Values given are n (%) unless stated otherwise.

* Fisher's exact test.

One participant did not have relevant data.

HIV status not confirmed for 16 participants.

Vaginal bacterial community and HIV infection

Because HIV has previously been shown to be associated with disruptions in the vaginal microbiota, which could be explained by suppressed immune system associated with the disease, and may remain even in HIV-positive persons on combination anti-retroviral therapy [Reference Spear52, Reference Douek, Roederer and Koup53], we evaluated the association between vaginal CST and HIV status in our study. There was a trend (P = 0·06) towards reduced HIV infection in women with a Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota compared to women with a Lactobacillus-deficient state (CST IV-B), [CST I: odds ratio (OR) 0·4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·2–1·3; CST III: OR 0·6, 95% CI 0·4–1·1] (Table 2).

Vaginal bacterial community and prevalent hrHPV infection

In model A, CST I, III and VI were inversely associated with hrHPV infection compared to CST IV-B although these were not statistically significant (Table 4a ). Further adjustments for age, sexual debut age, total number of sex partners in the previous year, visual inspection with acetic acid results, HIV status and reported use of male condoms in multivariable logistic regression model (model C) did not change the relationship (Table 4a ).

Table 4a. Association between vaginal bacterial community types and hrHPV, Abuja, Nigeria 2012

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.

* Exact logistic regression model.

Table 4b. Association between vaginal bacterial community state type (CST) and any human papillomavirus (HPV) infection

* Six participants were missing information on low-risk HPV infection and were excluded from this analysis.

In model B, we observed inverse associations for CST I, CST III and CST VI although none of the associations were significant, similar to what we saw in model A. Women with CST IV-B had a positive association with being hrHPV positive (OR 1·50) but this was also not statistically significant.

We also evaluated the relationship between any HPV infection (34 types detected) and vaginal bacterial community type. We observed that CST was associated with HPV detection (P = 0·047, Table 4b ). There was an increased proportion of women with CST IV-B in those who had any HPV infection compared to women without any HPV infection.

Considering the potential for effect modification by HIV infection, we generated interaction terms for vaginal bacterial communities and HIV and tested these using the likelihood ratio test; these were also not statistically significant (P = 0·59).

We then compared the vaginal microbiota from hrHPV-infected and -uninfected women using weighted UniFrac distances and found that the vaginal microbiota of hrHPV-positive women was significantly different from that of hrHPV-negative women but only in HIV-negative women (P = 0·02) and not in HIV-positive women (Fig. 3). Of HIV-positive women, there was no difference in the sample distance distribution of hrHPV-positive compared to hrHPV-negative women (P = 0·64). We used LEfSe to identify the specific bacterial taxa that were differentially present or abundant in the vaginal microbiota of HIV-negative women with and without hrHPV infection (Fig. 4). We focused on HIV-negative women because of the results of the weighted UniFrac distances that showed that the vaginal microbiota exhibited little variation in the specific bacterial taxa of HIV-positive women by hrHPV status (Fig. 3). hrHPV infection was strongly associated with abundance of various vaginal bacterial taxa, particularly members of the families Leptotrichiaceae and Prevotellaceae, and also Clostridiaceae and Peptostreptococcaceae. The most abundant genera in the hrHPV-positive group were Prevotella and Leptotrichia from the phyla Fusobacteria and Bacteriodetes, respectively. The occurrence of hrHPV infection was also strongly associated with lower abundance of L. iners with an LDA score of 5·05 (Fig. 4b )

Fig. 3. Histogram of weighted UniFrac distance between samples by human papillomavirus (HPV)/HIV metadata. The distribution of distance between samples of HPV + /HIV–, HPV–/HIV–, HPV + /HIV + , and HPV–/HIV+ women is shown.

Fig. 4. (a) Cladogram representing the taxonomic hierarchical structure of the identified phylotype biomarkers, generated using LEfSe [Reference Segata47]. Phylotype biomarkers are identified comparing samples collected from HIV–/HPV– and HIV–/HPV+ participants. Each filled circle represents one biomarker. Red, phylotypes statistically overrepresented under the condition of HPV + /HIV–; green, phylotypes overrepresented under the condition of HPV–/HIV–; yellow, phylotypes for which relative abundance is not significantly different between the two conditions. The diameter of each circle is proportional to the phylotype's effect size, phylum and class are indicated in their names on the cladogram and the order, family, or genera are given in the key. (b) Identified phylotype biomarkers ranked by effect size in HIV– women. The phylotype biomarkers are identified as being significantly abundant comparing samples collected from HPV– and HPV+ women with an alpha value <0·05. The graph was generated using the LEfSe program. The phylotypes are ranked according to their effect size that are associated with different conditions with the highest median. The Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) score [Reference Segata47] at the log10 scale is indicated at the bottom. The greater the LDA score is, the more significant the phylotype biomarker is in the comparison.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we examined the association between vaginal microbiota and prevalent hrHPV infection in Nigerian women. We found a moderate association between prevalent hrHPV and a low relative abundance of Lactobacillus sp. In subset analysis, LEfSe analysis and comparisons of the weighted UniFrac distances showed that this relationship was statistically significant in HIV-negative individuals. The most abundant genera in the HIV-negative hrHPV-positive participants in this study were Prevotella and Leptotrichia. Prevotella has been shown to be present in certain dysbiotic states such as occurs in BV [Reference Puapermpoonsiri15]. Although Leptotrichia which belongs to the same family as the genera Fusobacterium and Sneathia, is considered to be part of the normal oral cavity and the female genital tract microflora, it has been isolated from infections of the female genital tract such as salpingitis and BV [Reference Kononen54, Reference Harwich55]). Our result is similar to that obtained in a Korean study where HPV positivity was associated with a lower prevalence of Lactobacillus spp. and an increased abundance of anaerobic bacteria including Prevotella, Sneathia, Dialister, and Bacillus species [Reference Lee29].

Another key finding from our study was that CST IV-B, a state characterized by a substantial lack of Lactobacillus spp. and high levels of G. vaginalis and other facultative and strict anaerobes, was the most prevalent CST regardless of hrHPV and HIV status. This CST has previously been reported as the most common CST in African American women [Reference Ravel51, Reference Zhou56]. Another study of Tanzanian women also found G. vaginalis and L. iners were the most prevalent members of the microbiota in their study population [Reference Rajamanoharan57].

Further, despite CST assignments, L. iners and L. crispatus were detected in most samples from our study, with L. iners present in higher abundance in a larger number of samples. The presence of some lactic acid-producing bacteria in the majority of the communities suggests the capability for each community state to provide some measure of protection.

There were very few women with CST VI in this study, and additional characterization of this group of women revealed that they were mainly post-menopausal. The relative lack of Lactobacillus spp. in these women may be an indication of the changes in the composition of the vaginal microbiota as oestrogen levels decline [Reference Freedman58]. These observations are consistent with the findings of a positive association between post-menopausal state and a low Lactobacillus spp. vaginal microbial state in a prospective cohort study of 87 women participating in a study assessing HPV in the perimenopause [Reference Brotman59] and the findings of an increased abundance of proteobacteria in a twin cohort in Korea [Reference Lee29]. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to fully characterize the changes in vaginal microbiota at menopause.

The determinants of vaginal microbiota composition in any population are not well known. The observed variation by ethnic groups described by Ravel et al. [Reference Ravel51] may reflect a role for genetic factors but does not rule out non-genetic risk factors such as socio-cultural and health practices. The preponderance of Lactobacillus-depleted communities in Nigerian women may underlie well-known differences in the susceptibility of black women to BV and sexually transmitted infections [Reference Rajamanoharan57].

With regard to HIV infection, our results showed a trend towards an association between the type of vaginal microbiota present and HIV, with L. crispatus-dominated CST I and L. iners-dominated CST III being inversely associated compared to the more diverse CST IV-B. Additionally, CST VI appeared to be more prevalent in HIV-positive participants. These observations are similar to the findings of Spear et al. in a subset of the participants in the Women's Interagency HIV Study [Reference Spear60], where it was observed that HIV-negative women had a higher abundance of L. iners. In another analysis by Spear et al., it was observed that there was a higher microbial diversity in women with HIV infection [Reference Spear52], and this is congruent with our findings. Our findings are also in agreement with the findings of Borgdorff et al. in a study of 174 female sex workers in Rwanda, where HIV prevalence was higher in women with vaginal microbiome clusters not dominated by Lactobacillus sp. [Reference Borgdorff31]. Given the role of HIV in immune suppression, it is possible that the reduced immunity may account for the greater microbial diversity, or by contrast, women lacking Lactobacillus spp. were at greater risk for acquiring or transmitting HIV.

Our study is limited by its cross-sectional design, therefore we could only evaluate associations and are unable to infer causality. Another limitation of this study is that we evaluated associations between CSTs and prevalent hrHPV infection. Prevalent hrHPV has a weaker association with cervical cancer and pre-cancer compared to persistent hrHPV infection and HPV status is known to fluctuate in studies where samples are frequently collected [Reference Liu61]. However, we continued to follow-up these participants to ascertain whether these associations would change with persistent hrHPV infection. Our participants were recruited from cervical cancer screening clinics and may not represent women in the community in general. Some of the data used in this study were self-reported and thus subject to recall bias. Other limitations of self-reported data particularly those related to sexual practices include the tendency to provide only socially desirable responses.

To our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the association between vaginal microbiota composition and structure, and hrHPV in African populations using culture-independent techniques to characterize the vaginal microbiota and hrHPV. Other studies have used culture-independent techniques to characterize the vaginal microbiota in HIV-positive women in African populations [Reference Borgdorff31, Reference Hummelen62, Reference Frank63], but did not evaluate its relationship with hrHPV specifically. We found that vaginal microbial composition in African women is similar to that of African American women and that hrHPV infection was strongly associated with the abundance of various vaginal bacterial taxa, particularly Prevotella and Leptotrichia. These findings are hypothesis generating and warrant further investigations in larger cohorts followed longitudinally.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268815000965.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The project described was supported by NCI 1D43 CA153792 to C.A.A. and NIH/NHGRI 1U54HG006947-01A1 to C.A.A.; HPV genotyping was supported by NIAID U19 AI084081 to C.M.W., and R.M.B. was supported by NIAID K01 AI080974. B.M., D.F., H.Y., P.G. and J.R. were supported by NIAID U19AI084044. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank the Research Nurses Chika Onyenakie, Ebimoboere Apreala, Claire Anyanwu, Joke Idowu, Dayo Satoye, Gladys Omenuko and Jane Anichebe for their help in recruitment and enrolment of participants; and George Odonye for his role in data management.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Ferlay, J, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v. 1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Parkin, DM, et al. Cancer in Africa 2012. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2014; 23: 953966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Jemal, A, et al. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2010; 19: 18931907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Jedy-Agba, E, et al. Cancer incidence in Nigeria: a report from population-based cancer registries. Cancer epidemiology 2012; 36: e271278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Galloway, D, et al. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: human papilloma viruses, volume 90. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2007.Google Scholar
6. Schmeink, CE, et al. Prospective follow-up of 2,065 young unscreened women to study human papillomavirus incidence and clearance. International Journal of Cancer 2013; 133: 172181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rodriguez, AC, et al. Longitudinal study of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3: critical role of duration of infection. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010; 102: 315324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Rositch, AF, et al. Contributions of recent and past sexual partnerships on incident human papillomavirus detection: acquisition and reactivation in older women. Cancer Research 2012; 72: 61836190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Clarke, MA, et al. A large, population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and human papillomavirus infection. BMC Infectious Diseases 2012; 12: 33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Herrero, R, et al. Sexual behavior, venereal diseases, hygiene practices, and invasive cervical cancer in a high-risk population. Cancer 1990; 65: 380386.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. de Sanjose, S, et al. Sexually transmitted agents and cervical neoplasia in Colombia and Spain. International Journal of Cancer 1994; 56: 358363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Schmauz, R, et al. Multiple infections in cases of cervical cancer from a high-incidence area in tropical Africa. International Journal of Cancer 1989; 43: 805809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Gillet, E, et al. Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases 2011; 11: 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Hillier, SL, et al. The relationship of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli to bacterial vaginosis and genital microflora in pregnant women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 79: 369373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Puapermpoonsiri, S, et al. Vaginal microflora associated with bacterial vaginosis in Japanese and Thai pregnant women. Clinical infectious diseases 1996; 23: 748752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Gupta, K, et al. Inverse association of H2O2-producing lactobacilli and vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1998; 178: 446450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Gray, RH, et al. HIV-1 infection associated with abnormal vaginal flora morphology and bacterial vaginosis. Lancet 1997; 350: 1780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Taha, TE, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS 1998; 12: 16991706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Martin, HL, et al. Vaginal lactobacilli, microbial flora, and risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and sexually transmitted disease acquisition. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1999; 180: 18631868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Rodriguez-Cerdeira, C, Sanchez-Blanco, E, Alba, A. Evaluation of association between vaginal Infections and high-risk human Papillomavirus yypes in female sex workers in Spain. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. Published online: 31 July 2012. doi: 10.5402/2012/240190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Ma, B, Forney, LJ, Ravel, J. Vaginal microbiome: rethinking health and disease. Annual Review of Microbiology 2012; 66: 371389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Boskey, ER, et al. Acid production by vaginal flora in vitro is consistent with the rate and extent of vaginal acidification. Infection and Immunity 1999; 67: 51705175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Hickey, RJ, et al. Understanding vaginal microbiome complexity from an ecological perspective. Translational Research 2012; 160: 267282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Spear, GT, et al. Human alpha-amylase present in lower genital gract mucosal fluid processes glycogen to support vaginal colonization by lactobacillus. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2014; 210: 10191028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Motevaseli, E, et al. Normal and tumor cervical cells respond differently to vaginal lactobacilli, independent of pH and lactate. Journal of Medical Microbiology. Published online: 25 April 2013. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.057521-0.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Nugent, RP, Krohn, MA, Hillier, SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991; 29: 297301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Amsel, R, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. American Journal of Medicine 1983; 74: 1422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Castle, PE, et al. An association of cervical inflammation with high-grade cervical neoplasia in women infected with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Cancer epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2001; 10: 10211027.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Lee, JE, et al. Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e63514.Google Scholar
30. Brotman, RM, et al. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus Detection. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2014; 210: 17231733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Borgdorff, H, et al. Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME Journal 2014; 8: 17811793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Akarolo-Anthony, SN, et al. HIV associated high-risk HPV infection among Nigerian women. BMC Infectious Diseases 2013; 13: 521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Famooto, A, et al. RPS19 and TYMS SNPs and prevalent high risk human papilloma virus infection in Nigerian women. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e66930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Harris, PA, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2009; 42: 377381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Caporaso, JG, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME Journal 2012; 6: 16211624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Masella, AP, et al. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2012; 13: 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Edgar, RC, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011; 27: 21942200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Wang, Q, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2007; 73: 52615267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. McDonald, D, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME Journal 2012; 6: 610618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006; 22: 26882690.Google Scholar
41. Lozupone, C, Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2005; 71: 82288235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Caporaso, JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 2010; 7: 335336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Gajer, P, et al. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Science Translational Medicine 2012; 4: 132ra152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Oksanen, J, et al. Vegan: community ecology package version 2.0-2. R CRAN package, 2011.Google Scholar
45. Castle, PE, et al. Comparison of linear array and line blot assay for detection of human papillomavirus and diagnosis of cervical precancer and cancer in the atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008; 46: 109117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Bouvard, V, et al. A review of human carcinogens – Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncology 2009; 10: 321322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Segata, N, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology 2011; 12: R60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Fisher, RA. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 1936; 7: 179188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Kruskal, WH, Wallis, WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1952; 47: 583621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Cole, JR, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 2009; 37: D141D145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Ravel, J, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2011; 108 (Suppl. 1): 46804687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. Spear, GT, et al. Comparison of the diversity of the vaginal microbiota in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women with or without bacterial vaginosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008; 198: 11311140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Douek, DC, Roederer, M, Koup, RA. Emerging concepts in the immunopathogenesis of AIDS. Annual Review of Medicine 2009; 60: 471484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Kononen, E, et al. The oral gram-negative anaerobic microflora in young children: longitudinal changes from edentulous to dentate mouth. Oral Microbiology and Immunology 1994; 9: 136141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Harwich, MD Jr., et al. Genomic sequence analysis and characterization of Sneathia amnii sp. nov. BMC Genomics 2012; 13 (Suppl. 8): S4.Google Scholar
56. Zhou, X, et al. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME Journal 2007; 1: 121133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57. Rajamanoharan, S, et al. Bacterial vaginosis, ethnicity, and the use of genital cleaning agents: a case contro study. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1999; 26: 404409.Google Scholar
58. Freedman, M. Vaginal pH, estrogen and genital atrophy. Menopause Management 2008; 17: 913.Google Scholar
59. Brotman, RM, et al. Association between the vaginal microbiota, menopause status, and signs of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 2014; 21: 450458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Spear, GT, et al. Pyrosequencing of the genital microbiotas of HIV-seropositive and -seronegative women reveals Lactobacillus iners as the predominant lactobacillus species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2011; 77: 378381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Liu, S-H, et al. Characterizing the temporal dynamics of human papillomavirus DNA detectability using short-interval sampling. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention; 23: 200208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Hummelen, R, et al. Deep sequencing of the vaginal microbiota of women with HIV. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e12078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63. Frank, DN, et al. Altered vaginal microbiota are associated with perinatal mother-to-child transmission of HIV in African women from Burkina Faso. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2012; 60: 299306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of study participants, by hrHPV status

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Heat map of relative abundance for the 50 most abundant bacterial taxa found in the vaginal bacterial communities of all participants in the study. Ward linkage clustering was used to cluster samples based on their Jensen–Shannon distance calculated in the vegan package in R [44]. Identified community state types (CSTs) are labelled as I, III, and IV, according to the previous naming convention [51]. hrHPV, High-risk human papillomavirus.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Weighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot comparing sample distribution belonging to different community state types (CSTs). See Figure 1 for sample CST assignments used in this figure.

Figure 3

Table 2. Association between vaginal bacterial community state types (CSTs) and HIV, Abuja, Nigeria 2012

Figure 4

Table 3. Characteristics of individuals in community state type (CST) VI compared to other CSTs

Figure 5

Table 4a. Association between vaginal bacterial community types and hrHPV, Abuja, Nigeria 2012

Figure 6

Table 4b. Association between vaginal bacterial community state type (CST) and any human papillomavirus (HPV) infection

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Histogram of weighted UniFrac distance between samples by human papillomavirus (HPV)/HIV metadata. The distribution of distance between samples of HPV + /HIV–, HPV–/HIV–, HPV + /HIV + , and HPV–/HIV+ women is shown.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. (a) Cladogram representing the taxonomic hierarchical structure of the identified phylotype biomarkers, generated using LEfSe [47]. Phylotype biomarkers are identified comparing samples collected from HIV–/HPV– and HIV–/HPV+ participants. Each filled circle represents one biomarker. Red, phylotypes statistically overrepresented under the condition of HPV + /HIV–; green, phylotypes overrepresented under the condition of HPV–/HIV–; yellow, phylotypes for which relative abundance is not significantly different between the two conditions. The diameter of each circle is proportional to the phylotype's effect size, phylum and class are indicated in their names on the cladogram and the order, family, or genera are given in the key. (b) Identified phylotype biomarkers ranked by effect size in HIV– women. The phylotype biomarkers are identified as being significantly abundant comparing samples collected from HPV– and HPV+ women with an alpha value <0·05. The graph was generated using the LEfSe program. The phylotypes are ranked according to their effect size that are associated with different conditions with the highest median. The Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) score [47] at the log10 scale is indicated at the bottom. The greater the LDA score is, the more significant the phylotype biomarker is in the comparison.

Supplementary material: File

Dareng supplementary material S1

Supplemental Table

Download Dareng supplementary material S1(File)
File 20.8 KB