Medical students represent a largely untapped reservoir of potential in global health issues. This group can provide a youth perspective to global health issues, contribute to research in a manner in which busy seniors cannot, and be an addition to the global health workforce in times of need.1,Reference Cheung2 This last point is the focus of our research.
At the time of writing (April 2020), the world was experiencing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); a pandemic with unprecedented social and financial impacts that was placing pressure on healthcare systems around the world. One solution to alleviating this pressure was by asking medical students to help.Reference Mahase3-Reference Whelan, Prescott and Young5
Many medical schools have been suspended or moved to online platforms, leaving students with extra time on their hands; time that can potentially be spent helping.Reference Adams4,Reference Whelan, Prescott and Young5 Medical students worldwide have already started moving to the frontline.Reference Harvey6 In the United Kingdom and Brazil, for example, final year medical students have been fast-tracked to join the workforce early.Reference Iacobucci7,8
Guidance toward medical students helping on the frontline has been published by several organizing bodies, but due to the dynamic situation, this guidance continues to change.Reference Whelan, Prescott and Young9,10 Therefore, it is important to ascertain what exactly would be the best way for medical students to help. The primary role of the medical student is to learn to be a doctor, and deviations from this may have consequences both for medical students and the healthcare system around them. However, having students in the healthcare environment during a pandemic can be an increased burden to clinicians who need to invest time to teach them. Consequently, students’ education and patients’ care may be compromised.Reference Thomson11
Currently, there are multiple articles describing the role of medical students in past similar scenarios, their willingness to assist, as well as opinions on what roles medical students should play during COVID-19.Reference Bauchner and Sharfstein12,Reference Miller, Pierson and Doernberg13 However, to our knowledge, a systematic review that combines and assesses this information does not currently exist. Filling this gap in the evidence base will help better inform what role medical students can play in future global health emergencies, including COVID-19.
The aim of this review was to systematically assess how medical students can be involved in pandemics and global health emergencies. By outlining the roles medical students have already undertaken or potentially can undertake, the appropriateness of these roles, as well as how willing medical students are to be involved, this review can be used to guide decision-makers to design safe and effective roles for medical students in current and future global health emergencies.
METHODS
A rapid systematic review was used to collate, critically appraise, and synthesize the information, because it answered our question in a timely manner so our research could potentially inform the COVID-19 pandemic. PRISMA guidelines were followed throughout the process.Reference Moher, Liberati and Tetzlaff14 The review protocol submitted on March 30, 2020, accepted April 20, 2020 and can be found in the PROSPERO database [number: CRD42020177231].
Search Strategy
Four independent reviewers (A.M., R.S., I.B., I.V.) conducted a systematic search on March 31, 2020. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Global health database were searched for eligible studies with no date restrictions. Studies were available from 1946 to March 2020. The full search strategy can be found in Appendix 1. Bibliographies from eligible articles were screened (ie, snowballing) and the “Journal of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness” was hand searched through all volumes for further articles by reviewer L.B. Papers were initially screened by title and abstract and shortlisted articles were screened for full-text analysis against eligibility criteria by all 6 reviewers and any disputes were discussed. Data from eligible articles were inputted into a tailored data collection form which was trialed by 2 reviewers before use. All steps were recorded using the PRISMA diagram.
Eligibility Criteria
All studies that discussed roles medical students have played or can play, their willingness to do so, or whether they should do so in an acute global health emergency, including hypothetical studies, were included. “Global health emergency” was defined as any event that significantly and acutely affected the capacity or functioning of a health system in 1 or more countries, including but not limited to: infectious disease outbreaks, natural or man-made disasters, and armed conflict.
Only English language articles were included. The population of interest was medical students, defined as anyone from any country enrolled in a university course (undergraduate or postgraduate) training to be a doctor who has not yet finished their medical education. Articles that involved other participants (eg, nursing students) but also mentioned medical students, were included.
Qualitative research, quantitative research, and mixed methods studies, including systematic, scoping and literature reviews, published editorials, commentaries, and conference abstracts were included. We included gray literature to add a wider perspective. Gray literature included unpublished or nonpeer reviewed papers, reports, theses, and technical documentation.Reference Alberani, De Castro Pietrangeli and Mazza15
Studies involving nonacute events and diseases that were deemed nongeneralizable to the COVID-19 outbreak, eg, the opioid epidemic and obesity crisis, were excluded. Furthermore, studies that did not discuss medical students, eg, studies that exclusively discussed other populations (eg, veterinary, dental, or nursing students) were excluded because they did not include our population of interest. Non-English language papers were also excluded due to time constraints of translating these papers.
Outcome Measures
Our primary outcome was to collate descriptions of the roles medical students can play in a pandemic. These were predefined in the data extraction proforma as: clinical assistance; testing; helplines; triage; raising awareness; or “other,” if a different role was described, which the reviewer then specified. Our secondary outcomes included the level of willingness of medical students to help, factors affecting willingness, and appropriateness of the role.
Data Extraction and Analysis
Data were extracted using the predefined standardized form and included: article, author, year, journal, country, article type, article design, aim, area studied (role/willingness/appropriateness/preparedness), article population, setting/context, the number of participants, methodology, outcomes, key findings, relation to past global health emergency (if applicable), comments on the role; comments on willingness, comments on appropriateness, and critical appraisal.
Articles were critically appraised globally and briefly judged for risk of bias; however, the full use of quality assessment tools was not feasible due to time constraints. All included papers were critically appraised using the reviewers’ judgment, expertise, and by means of discussion among the 6 researchers. The design, outcome measure, and whether the study was peer-reviewed or a gray literature study played a role in guiding whether articles are of high or low quality and are reported on in the discussion section.
Data were analyzed thematically and written up as a narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
Article Characteristics
Our search identified 802 articles as well as 28 from extra sources. A total of 365 articles were screened for title and abstract, and 323 of those were excluded. Sixty-six articles were screened for the full manuscript, and 28 of those met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Most of the included articles had good quality of evidence but unpublished gray literature (eg, expert opinion pieces) had poorer evidence quality.
FIGURE 1 PRISMA flow diagram of articles identified, screened, included and excluded.
Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of all included articles. Seventeen articles discussed roles, 12 discussed willingness, and 13 directly discussed appropriateness (Chen E, Goodman KW, Fiore RN. Involving medical students in disaster response: ethics, education and opportunity [unpublished PDF]. 2014;1-17).Reference Abud, deArmas and Leon16-Reference Trepman42 As well as 13 articles purely discussing medical students, articles also examined nursing, pharmacy, and dental students. The views of medical students across multiple years were examined with an even spread. The context of the global health emergencies is detailed in Table 1, with 13 articles reporting on past situations that happened and 15 articles discussing hypothetical scenarios (Table 1).
TABLE 1 Baseline Characteristics of All Included Articles
Role
Seventeen of the 28 included articles discussed the roles of medical students during global health emergencies (Table 2). The most commonly reported role was providing clinical assistance (n = 12). In 2 of these articles, medical students acted as junior doctors.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Starr40 In 1918, during the outbreak of the Spanish Flu, medical students acted as nurses and interns because the usual medical workforce were away assisting the war troops.Reference Starr40 During the Kashmir Earthquake in Pakistan, medical students were sent to less accessible places compared with senior doctors due to their young age.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18
TABLE 2 Overview of the Described Roles of Medical Students in Global Health Emergencies
Other noteworthy cases include how, in the 1950s, during the poliomyelitis outbreak in Europe, 1500 medical and dental students provided mechanical ventilation (Chen E, Goodman KW, Fiore RN. Involving medical students in disaster response: ethics, education and opportunity [unpublished PDF]. 2014;1-17). In 2001, after the World Trade Center (WTC) terrorist attack, students provided clinical assistance in hospital emergency wards and participated in surgical and resuscitation teams.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28 In 2010, after an earthquake, a tsunami hit Chile and medical students provided medical care in remote areas.Reference Reyes39 Recently, it has also been hypothesized that medical students can provide clinical care by distributing medication to hospital staff and providing manual ventilation.Reference Boulos, Benzing and Zucker20,Reference Lin, Bhalla and King31
The role of medical students as educators through raising awareness was also highlighted (n = 3). In 1987, during the HIV epidemic, medical students developed a peer-to-peer teaching system to raise awareness and contribute to better patient care.Reference Cohen and Cohen21 During the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Ebola outbreaks, students held (online) campaigns to promote healthier behavior.Reference Abud, deArmas and Leon16,Reference Patil, Chan and Yan37
Other reported roles entailed nonclinical assistance. In 1945, in the immediate liberation of Belsen Concentration Camp, medical students set up an acute care hospital for emergency treatment of the inmates waiting to be transferred and a pharmaceutical dispensary.Reference Trepman42 During the 2001 WTC terrorist attack, medical students participated as “runners” to carry information between triage stations, prepared food for rescue workers, worked in emergency hotlines to provide information to families of victims, fundraised, donated blood, and assisted in psychiatric disaster services (Chen E, Goodman KW, Fiore RN. Involving medical students in disaster response: ethics, education and opportunity [unpublished PDF]. 2014;1-17).Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28
Medical students who were further in their medical education were more likely to provide medical assistance (n = 6).Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Berhane, Orton and Waight19,Reference Eastwood, Tsai and Chen22,Reference Kaiser, Barnett and Hayanga27,Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Starr40 Furthermore, the challenges faced by medical students in their roles during the global health emergency was discussed (n = 2). These challenges included: a lack of supervision, treating children, and prioritizing medical need.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Starr40
The impact on the mental health of medical students was also highlighted, both during and after the emergency event (n = 3).Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Keil29,Reference Reyes39 For example, during the provision of clinical care during the 1918 influenza epidemic, medical students experienced psychological distress during their fieldwork, such as fear, anxiety, depressive symptoms, despair, and panic.Reference Starr40 An article on the 2001 WTC terrorist attack suggested that the type of role played appeared to correlate with how much the students were affected. It was found that students working in fundraisers and hotlines had significantly higher symptoms. Medical students who assisted in medical care at hospitals had the fewest symptoms and a greater sense of empowerment.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28 The same article also concluded that involvement in the disaster was associated with a reinforced desire to become a physician.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28
Willingness
Twelve of the included articles evaluated the willingness of medical students to help in disaster situations (Table 3). Most (n = 11) reported quantitative data on the level of willingness of medical students to help in a disaster as shown in Table 3. The percentage of medical students willing to help ranged between 36% and 92.5%, with 9 of the 11 articles reporting a willingness percentage greater than or equal to 50%. One article reported the willingness of medical students to be involved on a different scale but equated it as “moderate willingness.”Reference Al-Ziftawi, Elamin and Mohamed Ibrahim17 One article did not provide quantitative data but reported that “the majority of students responding to the survey were willing to respond to disaster events.”Reference Markenson, Woolf and Redlener32
TABLE 3 Overview of the Reported Willingness of Medical Students to Be Involved in the Response to Global Health Emergencies
Seven of the included articles provided reasons to explain the medical students’ level of willingness. Obligation or social responsibility was stated most commonly, along with altruism, as a reason why medical students were willing to be involved. Concerns for personal health and safety, as well as concerns for family health and safety, were the 2 most commonly stated reasons for students being unwilling to help (Table 4). Some (n = 8) also discussed factors that affected the willingness, which are described in Table 5.
TABLE 4 Summary of the Reasons Provided to Explain the Level of Willingness Reported by Medical Students
TABLE 5 Summary of the Factors Affecting the Level of Willingness Reported by Medical Students
When comparing willingness levels with medical students’ confidence and knowledge in the final 2 y of medical school, willingness was seen to be proportionally higher than knowledge.Reference Al-Ziftawi, Elamin and Mohamed Ibrahim17,Reference Herman, Rosychuk and Bailey24,Reference Mortelmans, Dieltiens and Anseeuw34-Reference Patel, Wattamwar and Kanduri36 One article reported over 59% of students willing to help, but only 23.7% of students believed they have the skills to help.Reference Gouda, Kirk and Sweeney23
Appropriateness
Thirteen articles discussed appropriateness of the roles. This included looking at medical students’ confidence and preparedness for specific roles. Five studies measured students’ skill levels; confidence to deal with emergency outbreaks ranged between 23.7 and 53.2% (Table 6).Reference Gouda, Kirk and Sweeney23,Reference Kaiser, Barnett and Hsu26,Reference Mortelmans, De Cauwer and Van Dyck33-Reference Mortelmans, Bouman and Gaakeer35 Three articles found that students’ willingness was high, but when compared with their self-perceived knowledge, they did not feel prepared.Reference Mortelmans, De Cauwer and Van Dyck33-Reference Mortelmans, Bouman and Gaakeer35 The perspective study by Starr describes “For me and my classmates, knowledge of the disease we were to face so soon was limited to the contents of that 1 lecture.”Reference Starr40
TABLE 6 Overview of the Students’ Confidence in Their Skills, Knowledge, and Education to Deal With Global Health Emergencies
The need for disaster management training was also highlighted (n = 2), due to the lack of preparation of students.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Reyes39 Only 3 articles reported training their students before carrying out their role, and Reyes described volunteers as being “quickly trained.”Reference Lim, Oh and Koh30.Reference Lin, Bhalla and King31.Reference Reyes39 There are ethical issues of involving medical students in global health emergencies, including students’ safety, medico-legal issues, and health insurance of students.Reference Eastwood, Tsai and Chen22,Reference Keil29,Reference Lim, Oh and Koh30 Eastwood et al. specifically highlighted the importance of students to be well informed and be able to make the decision of being involved themselves.Reference Eastwood, Tsai and Chen22
DISCUSSION
The review outlines the past involvement of medical students in global health emergencies. This can help to guide decision-makers in choosing appropriate roles that medical students are willing to do and are prepared to carry out in a global health emergency.
Role
Historically, medical students have been involved in the response to global health emergencies and pandemics in a variety of ways.Reference Abud, deArmas and Leon16,Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Cohen and Cohen21,Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Patil, Chan and Yan37,Reference Rega and Bork38 Our results identified a range of roles that students have played in the past, thus highlighting the potential roles medical students are able to play in the current COVID-19 pandemic or future global health emergencies.
Unlike members of the general public, medical students have attained several relevant clinical skills during their years of training, which can be useful in a situation where the healthcare system is under pressure. For example, in 1 study, students assisted the resuscitation team, a skill students learn during medical school.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28 The current data suggest that the most common roles played were, in fact, clinical roles. However, nonclinical roles, such as runners to carry information, assisting in hotlines, and psychiatric services were also described (Chen E, Goodman KW, Fiore RN. Involving medical students in disaster response: ethics, education and opportunity [unpublished PDF]. 2014;1-17).Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28
A role that should not be neglected, however, is the normal role of a medical student—to learn. It is important to consider whether these alternative roles are appropriate in a specific situation. Of interest, 1 study concluded that being involved in such situations helps strengthen students’ desires to become physicians, suggesting that involvement does not only help to serve healthcare systems but the students themselves.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28 Other studies have also found clinical volunteering to be perceived positively by medical students, helping them develop clinical skills and collaborate with other healthcare professionals.Reference Sheu, Zheng and Coelho43
The range of roles described in the included articles highlights the versatility of medical student involvement. For example, 6 articles also described that medical students further in their medical education were more likely to provide medical assistance.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Berhane, Orton and Waight19,Reference Eastwood, Tsai and Chen22,Reference Kaiser, Barnett and Hayanga27,Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Starr40 One study found younger students were involved in more educational roles as first year students helped by raising awareness for HIV.Reference Cohen and Cohen21 This demonstrates that involvement in the response to global health emergencies is not limited to advanced medical students and that younger students, even though they may have less clinical knowledge, can still offer a valuable contribution when given an appropriate role. Furthermore, the variety of roles can allow certain challenges to be avoided. For instance, if a hospital is deemed to have a lack of supervisors, a commonly faced challenge even during nonemergency times, then medical students can get involved in a nondirect clinical role.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18
Several challenges were described as students undertook these roles, including a lack of supervision, a lack of experience, and a negative impact on their mental health.Reference Ayaz Sabri and Ahad Qayyum18,Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Keil29,Reference Reyes39 Pro-actively addressing these challenges will not only enable any involvement medical students have in the current or any global health emergency to be efficient and effective, but will also reduce any detrimental effect on the medical students’ mental health and medical education.
Our results demonstrate that such involvement in highly stressful situations can lead to anxiety, depressive symptoms, and emotional distress.Reference Katz, Gluck and Maurizio28,Reference Keil29,Reference Reyes39 Consequently, stress can lead to a higher prevalence of university student dropout.Reference Sosu and Pheunpha44 To avoid negative mental health impacts, adequate support must be provided to medical students if they are to be involved. This also highlights the need for further research that explores the short- and long-term effects on the students involved, and more specifically, the impact on their mental health and their future careers.
Ultimately, the roles of medical students might be very context-specific. A limitation of this review is the lack of data providing specific recommendations on the most suitable role of medical students in the differing types of global health emergencies. A further limitation is the paucity of data evaluating the roles medical students have previously undertaken. It is important to ascertain how effective medical students were in the emergency response and whether they made a real impact. Therefore, further research into the effectiveness of medical student involvement would be beneficial, and perhaps comparing this to global health emergencies that have not involved medical students.
Willingness
Eleven of the 12 articles (91.7%) discussing willingness reported a greater willingness than unwillingness among medical students to be involved in the response to pandemics and global health emergencies. Only Hwang et al. found the opposite pattern of only 36% of students willing to be involved.Reference Hwang, Hong and Heo25 This article focused specifically on whether medical students would enter a hypothetical closed area with a highly infectious disease and high fatality rate. Of interest, only 9% of those not wanting to enter stated fear of safety as their reason, and in contrast, 44% were unwilling to enter due to inefficiency.Reference Hwang, Hong and Heo25 This highlights the importance of organization when adding medical students to the workforce.
Obligation to help and social responsibility were the 2 most commonly stated reasons for wanting to help in such situations (Chen E, Goodman KW, Fiore RN. Involving medical students in disaster response: ethics, education and opportunity [unpublished PDF]. 2014;1-17).Reference Gouda, Kirk and Sweeney23-Reference Hwang, Hong and Heo25 This suggests that medical students believe they “should” volunteer, rather than “want” to. In turn, this can lead to students putting pressure on themselves to help, when they may not feel ready to do so, which will potentially hinder any positive effect they may have on the disaster situation, and could be dangerous for patients. Making students aware of both their mental and physical capabilities is essential to ensure that they only volunteer if they are prepared.
Certain factors encouraged student involvement, including a greater level of knowledge and being trained and receiving travel compensation. The most common discouraging factor was the severity of the event or outbreak.Reference Al-Ziftawi, Elamin and Mohamed Ibrahim17,Reference Berhane, Orton and Waight19,Reference Gouda, Kirk and Sweeney23,Reference Mortelmans, Dieltiens and Anseeuw34,Reference Mortelmans, Bouman and Gaakeer35 It is important to consider these factors, specifically by emphasizing encouraging factors, such as travel compensation and training before work. This, along with minimizing any discouraging factors where possible, will ensure the maximum number of medical students will be prepared to volunteer and, thus, increase the size of the workforce.
It is vital to support medical students to gain the extra help that is needed, as medical students would be going beyond their role of simply learning and being a student in an already stressful situation. Considering ways to decrease stress can help reduce negative mental health effects both during and after the event. Factors such as age and previous volunteering experience can be used to help target a specific cohort of medical students to volunteer with specific roles. For instance, initially approaching medical students who are already experienced with volunteering, before approaching the remainder of the medical student cohort if required, may be a more beneficial way of organizing a volunteering scheme.
Several studies found students reported that their willingness was higher than their knowledge and readiness.Reference Al-Ziftawi, Elamin and Mohamed Ibrahim17,Reference Gouda, Kirk and Sweeney23,Reference Mortelmans, De Cauwer and Van Dyck33-Reference Mortelmans, Bouman and Gaakeer35 This illustrates the need to better prepare medical students, who can indeed be a great addition to the workforce in disastrous situations. Knowledge about a specific disease is vital to students undertaking both clinical and nonclinical roles, such as raising awareness.Reference Al-Mohrej and Agha45 This preparation could be spread throughout their medical school education, or delivered immediately before a specific role.Reference Carney, Schilling and Frank46,Reference Rega, Bork and Chen47 The latter, however, would require further resources acutely during a disease outbreak, which may not be available.
The studies discussing willingness were limited by their methodology as they only measured medical students’ responses and did not compare with the general population. Furthermore, most studies were hypothetical situations and, therefore, students may answer differently if the real situation arose. Furthermore, there was no standardized survey of measuring willingness between all studies and this, along with the studies not comparing to a general cohort, limited the ability to carry out a meta-analysis.
Appropriateness
Three articles reported that, although medical students may have been willing to help, they may not have necessarily felt prepared or felt that they knew enough.Reference Mortelmans, De Cauwer and Van Dyck33-Reference Mortelmans, Bouman and Gaakeer35 The ethical considerations of the roles of medical students must be thoroughly explored before students are invited to help, especially where patient care may be compromised.
During times of nonglobal health emergencies, the primary role of medical students is education and to learn to be a doctor, which can take between 4 and 7 y. The need to help the workforce in times of crisis must be balanced with the educational and wellbeing needs of the medical student to complete their training. Whereas “learning on the job” can be an invaluable experience, the safety of both medical students and their patients must be considered. However, there was considerably less data on this aspect in the evidence base.
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF ARTICLE
This rapid systematic review provides an overview of the previous involvement of medical students in global health outbreaks, which, to the authors’ knowledge, no other systematic review has previously discussed. The inclusion criteria were kept broad, which allows the results to be generalizable for other future global-health emergencies, as well as the current COVID-19 pandemic. The predefined aims and objectives were answered and previous roles and their appropriateness were summarized. Although completing a rapid review may help inform the current COVID-19 pandemic, this study design also has limitations, especially due to time constraints. First, although each included article was discussed and data were extracted by 2 authors, no full formal critical appraisal or risk of bias tool was used. Second, due to the data not being sufficiently homogenous, a meta-analysis was not possible. Third, gray literature was included, which may yield lower quality evidence; however, on balance, it provided an invaluable insight into previous roles that had taken. The fact that medical students are the authors of this review is both a strength and a limitation. The authors are themselves experiencing the possibility of being involved in the current COVID-19 pandemic and, therefore, have insights into the difficulties and lack of data about this process.
Implication for Policy and Practice
Much has been written on previous roles students have taken in previous situations, and this can be used to inform future policy regarding COVID-19 and future global health emergencies. When designing the role itself, the willingness and preparedness of the medical students should be strongly taken into account. This will ensure specific roles are safe and within appropriate student competencies. Medical students should be given clinical roles within reason, and educational and social media roles may be given for the less clinically confident. This highlights the importance of co-production and including students themselves when planning these roles.
The authors of this review experienced firsthand the difficulty in defining roles for medical students in the current COVID-19 pandemic, within their own universities and hospital trusts. This highlights the lack of robust policy and knowledge surrounding this topic, and the consequent unnecessary delay in the use of a skillful resource. We thoroughly encourage governments to have predefined policies for medical schools if such events arise again. An infographic was made to summarize the findings of this review (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2 Medical Student Involvement in Global Health Emergencies.
FUTURE RESEARCH
Future research to both describe and evaluate the effectiveness of medical students’ roles during the current pandemic should be carried out to help guide future pandemics. This research should also encompass the safety of these roles and the short- and long-term effects on the medical students themselves. Furthermore, there is a dearth of literature on the ethical aspects of medical student involvement and duty during such situations. This has been discussed when looking at residents/junior doctors participating in such situations, but not for the medical student cohort.Reference Wolpaw48 Finally, this area of research can be expanded to provide information on the role of other healthcare students in global health emergencies, namely nursing, pharmacy, dental, and veterinary students.
CONCLUSIONS
Medical students are a willing and resourceful potential addition to the healthcare workforce during global health emergencies. Their involvement is vast and many roles have been identified; however, adequate and proactive support must be provided to help them overcome any challenges they may face. Choosing the perfect role is very subjective to each emergency. Therefore, it is vital to consider available resources, students’ opinions, and the nature of the emergency itself when planning roles. Future research should be targeted at filling important gaps in the literature discussed above, including evaluating the effectiveness of different roles undertaken by medical students in global health emergencies and the ethical issues regarding the appropriateness of the medical students’ involvement.
Conflict of Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 y, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Transparency Declaration
The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.
APPENDIX 1
PUBMED: ((medical student[Title/Abstract] OR student doctor[Title/Abstract] OR medical student*[Title/Abstract])) AND (Pandemic[Title/Abstract] OR Disease outbreak[Title/Abstract] OR Disaster medicine[Title/Abstract] OR Epidemic[Title/Abstract] OR Acute Respiratory Infection[Title/Abstract] OR Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome[Title/Abstract] OR Global health emergency[Title/Abstract] OR Public health emergency[Title/Abstract])
OVID: ((medical student or student doctor or medical student*) and (Pandemic or Disease outbreak or Disaster medicine or Epidemic or Acute Respiratory Infection or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome or Global health emergency or Public health emergency)).ab,ti.
Open access
