Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:07:04.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic burden of mental illness in Pakistan: an estimation for the year 2020 from existing evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2023

Mohsin Hassan Alvi
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]
Tehmina Ashraf
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Remedial Center Hospital and Nursing Home, Karachi, Pakistan
Tayyeba Kiran
Affiliation:
Assistant Director Research and Development, Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning, Karachi, Pakistan
Nasir Iqbal
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan
Anil Gumber
Affiliation:
Principal Health Economist, College of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
Anita Patel
Affiliation:
Health Economist, Anita Patel Health Economics Consulting, London, UK
Nusrat Husain
Affiliation:
Professor of Psychiatry, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This report is based on the extrapolation to 2020 of data on the economic burden of mental illnesses in Pakistan in 2006. Given the resultant estimated high economic burden of mental illness in the country (£2.97 billion in 2020), we advocate a revised budget allocation to mental healthcare. As a resource-scarce nation that is entangled in natural disasters, Pakistan needs cost-effective psychological interventions such as culturally adapted manual-assisted problem-solving training (C-MAP) for the prevention of self-harm and suicide and to move towards attaining the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Although government has taken initiatives to support healthcare services (such as the Sehat Sahulat Program for universal health coverage), there is still a need to implement a cost-effective national digital model for mental healthcare such as the Agha Khan Development Network Digital Health Programme.

Type
Special Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Despite 10–16%Reference Ansari1 of Pakistan's population suffering from mental illnesses and this being a major contributor to the overall burden of disease, mental illness remains overlooked in setting national priorities in this and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). LMICs are more vulnerable to natural disasters and, owing to people's poor socioeconomic status, mental health crises emerging from such disasters are also neglected.Reference Makwana2 According to the INFORM disaster risk index for 2019, Pakistan is ranked 18th out of 191 countries; flooding events are the most common disaster, causing an average annual loss around $1 billion.3 The worst monsoon flood in 2022 displaced more than 3.1 million people in Pakistan.Reference Akasha4 These events are associated with psychological distress due to financial problems and displacement.Reference Semrau, Evans-Lacko, Alem, Ayuso-Mateos, Chisholm and Gureje5 Considering the burden of psychological trauma, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) has introduced a psychoeducational package offering psychological first aid.Reference Akasha4 Although service provision for mental disorders is considered an integrated part of efficient healthcare systems, most LMICs fail to address the needs of at-risk populations (Fig. 1).Reference Sharpe and Davison6 Despite contributing 8.9% of the disease burden, mental illness remains neglected in such settings.Reference Sharpe and Davison6 Apart from a few studies conducted over the years, the associated economic cost remains unclear. To fill this gap, we have estimated the burden of mental illness in Pakistan.

Fig. 1 Risk and protective factors of mental health in Pakistan.

Method and results

We extrapolated the costs of mental illness in Pakistan from 2006 data (as reported in 2016 by Malik & KhanReference Malik and Khan7) to 2020 using the overall gross domestic product (GDP) deflator. This extrapolation showed that the economic burden of mental illness is rising at an alarming level, from 250.5 billion Pakistani rupees (PKR) in 2006 to 616.9 billion PKR in 2020 (Table 1). Only a fraction of the total health budget is allocated to mental health. In LMICs such as Pakistan, where the burden of mental illnesses is high, allocating only 2.4 billion PKR (0.4%)Reference Ansari1,Reference Mubbashar8Reference Khan10 from a total health budget of 617.2 billion PKR will not help much in overcoming the huge challenge.Reference Khan10 Our calculations suggest that the existing budget is only able to cover <2% of the entire economic burden of mental illnesses for the year 2020. A limited budget might not be a big problem if it is utilised effectively, but in LMICs effective allocation is also a challenge. A total of 11% of the country's mental health budget is utilised in hospital psychiatric units; the remaining 89% is for other mental health facilities.11 These hospital psychiatric units are mostly located in urban areas, and these are overburdened in most cities. Furthermore, patients are forced to manage the rising cost of psychiatric medication; over 2 million of Pakistan's population are living below the poverty line12 and only 5% of the population has access to free medicines.11 As Pakistan's public health sector has yet to fully recognise psychology as a profession, the number of psychology and psychiatry professionals in the country is limited: 20% of graduates prefer to settle in foreign countries because of the lack of opportunities in Pakistan.11 The fact that Pakistan has no comprehensive mental health policy makes it a neglected subject, not only in terms of poor institutional infrastructure but also in terms of legislation.Reference Shah13

Table 1 Estimated economic burden of mental illness for the year 2020 in Pakistana

GDP, gross domestic product; PKR, Pakistani rupees.

a. The 2020 economic burden data were extrapolated from the 2006 data using the Pakistan GDP deflator.14

b. The 2006 economic burden data are from Malik & Khan.Reference Malik and Khan7

Ways forward

Cost-effective psychological interventions

To address the burden of poor mental health, we need robust research on evaluation of treatments with minimum cost and maximum benefits. Depression, suicidal behaviour and other mental health problems are probably rising since COVID-19. Pakistan's journey towards the attainment of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for 2030 (https://sdgs.un.org/goals) demands effective prevention of mental illnesses and interventions to reduce the mental illness burden. Effective interventions can help by improving health and economic outcomes. Although efforts have already been started in Pakistan, researchers are struggling to present local evidence to the relevant stakeholders on how much should be invested in different healthcare projects. For example, it is estimated that a minimum of US$16 254 is required for reduction of self-harm (a psychosocial intervention delivery cost to gain one unit of output).Reference Alvi, Shiri, Iqbal, Husain, Chaudhry and Shakoor15 Some interventions have been tested and recommended: for example, a culturally adapted manual-assisted problem-solving training (C-MAP) intervention has been found to be cost-effective in reduction of self-harm in Pakistan.Reference Alvi, Shiri, Iqbal, Husain, Chaudhry and Shakoor15 To develop clinically effective and cost-effective interventions that are locally relevant, Pakistan needs to invest more in mental health research and capacity building.

Universal health coverage

In Pakistan, mental health services are now included in the Sehat Sahulat Program (a health insurance scheme for underprivileged citizens) but to a limited extent. Mental illness is often not covered by insurance, and government spending is considered the major source of financing for affordable healthcare. Pakistan's neighbouring countries, such as India and China, have allocated a separate share of their budget to mental healthcare. Efficient and effective budget allocation plays a vital role in cost minimisation. The mental health budget should be allocated with a particular focus on low-resource districts, to avoid patients and their families having to travel to tertiary care hospitals in better resourced districts of Pakistan. Subsidised mental health services can be provided by including all mental health treatments in the Sehat Sahulat Program or other health coverage programmes. There are some good international examples, such as the Agha Khan Development Network Digital Health, which operates in South-Central Asia; we need to implement a cost-effective digital model for healthcare at a national level.

Refocusing policy and funding

As children and youth are the future of any nation, they should hold greater focus in Pakistan's mental health policy. Currently, funding is targeted at specialist services only, but low-intensity therapies have also been shown to be cost-effective for treating mental illnesses.Reference Hamdani, Rahman, Wang, Chen, van Ommeren and Chisholm16 Timely evaluation and updated evidence could be the key to meeting the mental health needs of the country, achieving the United Nations' 2030 SDGs and ensuring progress in Pakistan.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available.

Author contributions

M.H.A. and T.A. were invovled in analysis of the data under the supervision of A.G. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript and reviewed the submitted version.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

Ansari, I. Mental health Pakistan: optimizing brains. Int J Emerg Ment Health Hum Resilience 2015; 17(1): 288.Google Scholar
Makwana, N. Disaster and its impact on mental health: a narrative review. J Fam Med Prim Care 2019; 8: 3090–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Climate Change Knowledge Portal. Pakistan. World Bank Group, 2021 (https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/pakistan/vulnerability).Google Scholar
Akasha, ES. Psychoeducational support package for people affected by floods in Pakistan. IFRC Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, 2022 (https://pscentre.org/psychoeducational-support_package-for-people-affected-by-floods-in-pakistan/).Google Scholar
Semrau, M, Evans-Lacko, S, Alem, A, Ayuso-Mateos, JL, Chisholm, D, Gureje, O, et al Strengthening mental health systems in low-and middle-income countries: the Emerald programme. BMC Med 2015; 13(1): 79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, I, Davison, CM. Climate change, climate-related disasters and mental disorder in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2021; 11(10): e051908.Google ScholarPubMed
Malik, MA, Khan, MM. Economic burden of mental illnesses in Pakistan. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2016; 19: 155–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Mubbashar, MH. Development of mental health services in Pakistan. Int Psychiatry 2003; 1: 11–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Hashmi, AM, Saleem, HA. New horizons: COVID-19 and the burden of neuropsychiatric illness in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36(COVID19-S4): S95–8.10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, AQ. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health in Pakistan. Pak Postgrad Med J 2020; 31: 121–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO-AIMS Report on Mental Health System in Pakistan. 2009. World Health Organization, 2018.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. (2020) Poverty & Equity Brief South Asia: Pakistan October 2021. World Bank Group (https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/poverty/987B9C90-CB9F-4D93-AE8C-750588BF00QA/AM2021/Global_POVEQ_PAK.pdf).Google Scholar
Shah, R. Neglected subject. DAWN 2017; 31 May.Google Scholar
Trading Economics (n.d.). GDP Deflator in Pakistan Decreased to 161.28 Points in 2021 from 346.29 Points in 2020. Source: State Bank of Pakistan. Trading Economics (https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/gdp-deflator).Google Scholar
Alvi, MH, Shiri, T, Iqbal, N, Husain, MO, Chaudhry, I, Shakoor, S, et al Cost-effectiveness of a culturally adapted manual-assisted brief psychological intervention for self-harm in Pakistan: a secondary analysis of the culturally adapted manual-assisted brief psychological randomized controlled trial. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 27: 6571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamdani, SU, Rahman, A, Wang, D, Chen, T, van Ommeren, M, Chisholm, D, et al Cost-effectiveness of WHO problem management plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2020; 217: 623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Risk and protective factors of mental health in Pakistan.

Figure 1

Table 1 Estimated economic burden of mental illness for the year 2020 in Pakistana

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.