Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:48:51.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food sources of nutrients among 13-year-old Portuguese adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2011

Joana Araújo*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Cardiovascular Research & Development Unity, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Milton Severo
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Cardiovascular Research & Development Unity, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Carla Lopes
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Cardiovascular Research & Development Unity, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Elisabete Ramos
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Cardiovascular Research & Development Unity, University of Porto Medical School, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To identify food sources of nutrients in adolescents’ diets and to identify differences in food sources according to individual characteristics.

Design

A cross-sectional evaluation was carried out in the 2003/2004 school year. Self-administered questionnaires were used and a physical examination was performed. Diet was evaluated using an FFQ.

Setting

Public and private schools in Porto, Portugal.

Subjects

Adolescents aged 13 years (n 1522) enrolled at school.

Results

The main sources of energy were starchy foods (26·5 %), dairy (12·5 %) and meat (12·0 %). The major contributors to carbohydrate intake were starchy foods (38·2 %) and fruit (13·8 %) and to protein intake were meat (28·0 %), dairy products (20·3 %), starchy foods (15·3 %) and seafood (13·6 %). The main sources of total fat were meat (22·0 %), starchy foods (13·4 %) and dairy products (12·7 %). Sweets and pastries presented important contributions to energy (11·1 %), carbohydrate (12·4 %), total fat (13·3 %) and saturated fat (16·6 %) intakes. Parental education was inversely associated with the contribution of sweets and pastries to energy, carbohydrate and fat intakes and it was positively associated with the seafood contribution to protein intake.

Conclusions

The major sources of carbohydrates were starchy foods, which also accounted for a quarter of energy intake. Dairy products plus meat accounted for another quarter of energy. Meat was a major source of protein and fats. Sweets and pastries contributed more than 10 % to energy, carbohydrates, total and saturated fat. Parental education was the strongest determinant of food sources and was positively associated with a healthier contribution of food groups.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

The burden of chronic diseases has been increasing in recent decades. In 2005 these diseases caused an estimated 35 million deaths, which represents 60 % of all deaths worldwide(1). The preventable nature of chronic diseases increases the importance of intervention as an instrument to decrease their burden(2).

Food intake is an important modifiable determinant of many of these diseases and its role throughout the life course in the promotion and maintenance of good health is well established(3). Early interventions are important due to the tracking of behaviours throughout life, which makes it more difficult for people to change their habits in later life(2). Adolescence is a particularly important period because it is a time of greater autonomy, where personal choices and preferences gain priority over family eating habits and in which adolescents progressively gain more control over what, when and where they eat(Reference Thomas4, Reference Shepherd and Dennison5).

Although a good deal of research has been done into nutrient intake and its relationship to health, from a public health point of view a transition is needed from a nutrient orientation to food-based strategies, preferably derived from existing patterns of food intake in the target population rather than from a theoretical basis(6). Additionally, identification of the main dietary sources of target nutrients is also important, because it allows the identification of differences in the relative contributions of various food groups to nutrient intake(Reference Thompson, Sowers and Frongillo7).

For public health interventions we need to be aware that food intake is determined by the interplay of many factors, such as public policies, food availability, food choices and personal characteristics(8). Socio-economic status is among the most widely described individual characteristic related to food intake, and many studies have shown that people with high education tend to have a diet closer to national or international recommendations(Reference Prattala, Hakala and Roskam9Reference Hulshof, Brussaard and Kruizinga11). What is more, age, gender and sport activities are often described as food intake determinants(Reference Thiele, Mensink and Beitz12). Therefore, the knowledge of differences in diet and specifically in food sources according to individual characteristics is important in order to adapt the messages to the general population and thus to provide efficient food-based programmes.

The aim of the present study was to identify the food sources of energy and ten nutrients in the diets of 13-year-old Portuguese adolescents. We also aimed to identify differences in food sources according to individual characteristics.

Methods

Eligible participants were adolescents born in 1990 and enrolled at public and private schools in Porto, Portugal, during the 2003/2004 school year, as described elsewhere(Reference Ramos and Barros13). Two thousand seven hundred and eighty-seven eligible participants were identified: 2126 (76·3 %) from public and 661 (23·7 %) from private schools. Among them, forty-four (1·6 %) could not be reached, 583 (20·9 %) were refusals (no signed informed consent form was returned) and 2160 (1651 public and 509 private school students) agreed to participate and provided information at least for part of the planned assessment, resulting in an overall participation rate of 77·5 %, similar in public (77·7 %) and private (77·0 %) schools.

Of the 2160 participants, 247 did not return the home questionnaire and 298 did not fill in the FFQ or were excluded because no information was provided on more than 10 % of food items. A further ninety-three participants were not considered for the current analysis because their total energy intake was more than 3 times the interquartile range or their intake of fruit or vegetables was more than 1·5 times the interquartile range. Thus, the analysis was based on the information of 1522 participants.

The evaluation included two self-administered questionnaires (one completed at home, another at school), comprising information on social, demographic and behavioural characteristics and individual and family history of disease. A physical examination was also performed at school, by a team of experienced nurses, nutritionists and physicians.

As part of the home questionnaire, food intake was recorded using an FFQ regarding the previous 12 months, completed by the adolescents at home with the help of their parents or legal guardians. The FFQ was designed according to Willett and colleagues(Reference Willett, Sampson and Stampfer14) and adapted for the Portuguese population based on the food items most commonly consumed and with a relevant contribution to the intakes of total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrates, cholesterol, dietary fibre, vitamin A, carotenoids, vitamins C and E, Ca, alcohol and caffeine, according to dietary data available for our country, namely the Portuguese food balance sheets and other specific studies(Reference Amaral, Nogueira and Paiva15, Reference Lopes, Fernandes and Barros16). Foods with similar nutrient composition were grouped together as a single food item. The questionnaire was validated for the adult population by comparison with four 7 d food records (each one in a different season of the year)(Reference Lopes17, Reference Lopes, Aro and Azevedo18). The FFQ was then adapted for adolescents by including foods more frequently eaten by this age group(Reference Silva, Rego and Guerra19); the adolescents’ version comprised ninety-one food items or beverage categories and a frequency section with nine possible responses ranging from never to six or more times daily. It also included an open-ended section for foods not listed in the questionnaire, but eaten at least once weekly.

Food intake data were obtained by multiplying the frequency of consumption of each food item by the nutrient content of the specified portion size. Seasonal variation of food consumption was also considered according to participants’ replies. To estimate nutrient intake from the evaluated food intake, we used the software Food Processor Plus version 7 (ESHA Research, Salem, OR, USA) based on values from the US Department of Agriculture. Values for typical Portuguese foods were added, based on the Portuguese tables of food composition, typical recipes and data from previous studies(Reference Lopes, Aro and Azevedo18). The nutrient content of food items which are usually eaten cooked was estimated by considering cooking and processing.

We defined fourteen food groups: (i) dairy (milk, yoghurt, cheese); (ii) meat (red and white meat, ham, sausages, pepperoni, smoked ham, bacon); (iii) seafood (fresh and canned fish, codfish, molluscs and crustaceans); (iv) eggs; (v) fats and oils (olive and other vegetable oils, margarine and butter); (vi) starchy foods (white bread or rusks and similar toasted products, brown bread, rye bread, cereal flakes, simple biscuits, wholegrain biscuits, rice, pasta, chips and boiled, baked and mashed potatoes); (vii) legumes (beans, chickpeas, peas, etc.); (viii) vegetables (cabbage, spinach, broccoli, onion, carrot, lettuce, peppers, tomato, cucumbers, etc.); (ix) vegetable soup; (x) fruit (fresh fruit, including tropical fruit and fresh fruit juice); (xi) sweets and pastry (other biscuits apart from simple ones, croissants, pastry, doughnuts, cakes, chocolates, chocolate snacks, dairy desserts, ice creams, quince jam, compote, jelly, honey, sugar, candy); (xii) non-alcoholic beverages (soda, juice, fruit juice); (xiii) fast food (pizza, hamburger, mayonnaise, salted snacks); and (xiv) others (canned fruit, nuts, olives, coffee, barley coffee, black tea, green tea, barley).

Food sources were computed for energy, protein, fats (total, saturated, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated and cholesterol), carbohydrates, fibre, Ca and Na. The amount of a specific nutrient provided by each food was calculated for each person and then each amount was divided by the total intake of that nutrient, resulting in the percentage contribution. The proportion of contribution of each food within the same group was added, to create the contribution of food groups. The results of the contribution of each food group to nutrient intake were presented as medians of the calculated contribution.

Parental education level was measured as the number of successfully completed years of formal schooling; in the analysis we used the information from the parent with the highest education level. Each school was considered public if it was state administered or private when it was not administered by local or national government. Parental education level and the type of school were used as indicators of socio-economic class.

We considered as practice of sports any planned, regular exercise, regardless of intensity, that was not part of obligatory curricular activities.

Weight and height were measured following standardized procedures(20). Adolescents were classified according to the age- and sex-specific BMI reference percentiles developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(Reference Kuczmarski, Ogden and Guo21), considering those at or above the 95th percentile as obese and those at or above the 85th percentile but below the 95th percentile as overweight.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package version 17·0 (SPPS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

The χ 2 test was used to compare qualitative variables according to gender. The contribution of each food group was presented as median (25th percentile–75th percentile). For each nutrient, food sources according to gender, type of school, parental education, practice of sports and BMI categories were computed only for food groups that provided 10 % or more of the nutrient intake. To estimate the magnitude of the association between the contribution of each food group and participants’ characteristics, odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals were computed using unconditional logistic regression. In order to do this, the contribution of each food group was divided into two categories: one corresponding to those with an intake lower than or equal to the median contribution and the other for those with an intake higher than the median contribution. Final models were adjusted for total energy intake in kilojoules (except in the model of energy sources) as a continuous variable and for gender, type of school, parental education, practice of sports and BMI categories as categorical variables. Logistic regression models included only 1398 individuals, because 124 adolescents had missing information in at least one covariate.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital S. João and written consent was obtained from both legal guardians and adolescents.

Results

From the 2160 eligible adolescents, we excluded 638 and considered 1522 subjects in the present analysis. The participants excluded were significantly more often male (52·8 % v. 46·5 %, P = 0·008), with less educated parents (parental education >12 years: 18·8 % v. 27·7 %) and mostly from public schools (84·3 % v. 73·1 %, P < 0·001). In terms of BMI categories and practice of sports, adolescents excluded were not significantly different from those included in the analysis.

The participants’ characteristics are described in Table 1. The majority of adolescents attended public schools (73·1 %) and 23·4 % had parents with 6 years or less of education, while 27·7 % had parents with more than 12 years of education, with no significant differences according to gender. A higher proportion of boys referred to practising sports compared with girls (62·4 % v. 41·3 %, P < 0·001). Prevalence of BMI categories did not differ according to gender: 15·3 % of girls and 18·2 % of boys were overweight and 10·1 % of girls and 11·1 % of boys were obese.

Table 1 Description and comparison of participants’ characteristics, according to gender: 13-year-old adolescents, Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

†According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(Reference Kuczmarski, Ogden and Guo21).

The major contributors to energy intake were starchy foods (26·5 %), followed by dairy foods (12·5 %) and meat (12·0 %; Table 2). Sweets and pastry accounted for about 10 % of energy intake. The three most important sources of carbohydrates were starchy foods (38·2 %), fruit (13·8 %) and sweets and pastry (12·4 %). Meat was the most important source of protein intake and its contribution was more than double that of seafood (28·0 % v. 13·6 %, respectively). The second protein source was the dairy group (20·3 %). The major contributor to total fat intake was meat (22·0 %), with starchy foods, dairy and sweets and pastry each accounting for about 13 % of the total fat intake. Meat was one of the highest sources of all types of fat, overtaken in saturated fat (23·0 %) only by dairy foods and by starchy foods in polyunsaturated fat (27·1 %). The two major contributors to fibre were starchy foods and fruit (38·0 % and 22·1 %, respectively). The leading source of Ca intake was dairy foods, providing almost 60 % of the total intake. Finally, the most important sources of Na intake were starchy foods, accounting for 34·6 %, followed by meat (14·9 %) and dairy foods (14·1 %).

Table 2 Proportional contribution of food groups to energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1522), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

P25, 25th percentile; P75, 75th percentile.

Comparing food contributions according to gender, we found statistically significant differences in the contribution of starchy foods to energy (respectively among girls and boys: 25·8 % v. 27·5 %, P = 0·002), carbohydrate (36·8 % v. 39·3 %, P = 0·001) and Na (34·0 % v. 35·9 %, P = 0·006) intakes; and the contribution of fruit to carbohydrates (14·6 % v. 13·2 %, P < 0·001).

For all nutrients, Tables 3 and 4 show the association between food sources that provided 10 % or more of the total intake of each nutrient according to some participant characteristics, presented as odds ratio adjusted for gender, type of school, parental education, sports, BMI and total energy intake. In comparison to girls, boys were more likely to have a higher contribution from starchy foods, significant for energy, carbohydrates and fibre; and to have a higher contribution from meat to saturated fat and monounsaturated fat intakes. However, being a boy was inversely associated with the contribution of fruit to carbohydrate intake (Table 3).

Table 3 Adjusted odds ratio of having a higherFootnote v. a lower contribution of the indicated food groups to daily energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1398), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

* OR and 95 % CI are statistically significant.

Have a food contribution above the median.

Reference class: girls.

§ Reference class: public school.

Reference class: 0–6 years of education.

OR adjusted for total energy intake, as a continuous variable, and for gender, type of school, parental education, sports and BMI as categorical variables.

Table 4 Adjusted odds ratio having a higherFootnote v. a lower contribution of the indicated food groups to daily energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1398), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

* OR and 95 % CI are statistically significant.

Have a food contribution above the median.

Reference class: do not practice sports.

§ Reference class: BMI < 85th percentile.

OR adjusted for total energy intake, as a continuous variable, and for gender, type of school, parental education, sports and BMI as categorical variables.

Considering the indicators of socio-economic class, adolescents from private schools presented a significantly lower contribution from sweets and pastry to carbohydrate intake and a lower contribution from starchy foods to fibre intake. Parental education was inversely associated with the contribution of sweets and pastry, significant for energy, carbohydrates and total, saturated and monounsaturated fats. It was also inversely associated with the contribution of starchy foods to total and monounsaturated fat intakes and with meat contribution to Na intake. A positive association was found between parental education and: seafood contribution, significant for protein and cholesterol; dairy contribution to Na and cholesterol intakes; the contribution of eggs to cholesterol intake; and the contribution of starchy foods to carbohydrate and Na intakes (Table 3).

Adolescents who referred to practising sports were more likely to have a significantly higher contribution of: starchy foods to Na intake; fruit to carbohydrate intake; and dairy foods to saturated fat intake (Table 4). On the other hand, the practice of sports was inversely associated with the contribution of fats and oils to total fat intake.

BMI was inversely associated with the contribution of sweets and pastry, significant for energy, carbohydrates and for total, saturated and monounsaturated fats. It was directly associated with the contribution of meat to energy intake and with the contribution of fruit to carbohydrate and fibre intakes (Table 4).

Discussion

In this sample of 13-year-old adolescents, starchy foods were one of the main food sources of the nutrients analysed, presenting an important contribution to energy, carbohydrates, total and polyunsaturated fat, fibre and Na. The high contribution of this group to fat intake or even to Na intake could seem unexpected; however, this is because cooked food is taken into account (for instance potatoes, pasta and rice), which contains added fats and salt. Additionally, processed foods, such as bread, biscuits and breakfast cereals, have a high salt content, since it is used as a preservative. Sweets and pastry, a group of high-energy-dense foods, presented an undesirably high contribution to energy intake, carbohydrates and fats. This contribution indicates the high consumption of these foods, which is in fact evident in data on Portuguese household food availability using the Data Food Networking (DAFNE) classification system(Reference Rodrigues and de Almeida22), which showed an increase in the household availability of bakery and sugar products between 1990 and 2000(23).

The contribution of fish to the diet of the adolescents in our sample was much lower than that of meat, since we found that the contribution of seafood to protein intake was less than half that of meat. Additionally, the contribution of seafood to the intake of total and polyunsaturated fats was much lower than the contribution of meat, which could be undesirable because of the known benefits of fats from fish(Reference He, Song and Daviglus24) regarding specific fatty acids, which were not analysed separately in this work. Since Portugal presented the highest food availability of fish in 1990 and 1995 among European countries participating in the DAFNE project(Reference Trichopoulou, Naska and Costacou25), our data may indicate that in other European countries the contribution of seafood to different nutrients may be much lower.

This high consumption of meat in our sample explains the high contribution of this food group to the intake of MUFA, even in a country with a high consumption of olive oil which is richer in this type of fat, but much less consumed than meat.

The importance of the consumption of fruit and vegetables is widely recognized. Since 1990 the WHO has recommended a minimum consumption of approximately 5 portions of fruit or/and vegetables daily(26), with a higher consumption of vegetables than fruit. However, in adolescents, more fruit was consumed than vegetables, since its contribution to fibre intake (22·1 %) was similar to or even higher than the contribution of vegetables (13·2 %, including the 5·2 % provided by vegetable soup).

When we made a comparison with the food sources of Portuguese adults(Reference Lopes, Oliveira and Santos27) assessed using a similar methodology of nutrient intake evaluation, our results were, in general, similar. Only few differences were found: while in adults seafood was the second highest source of protein, in adolescents it was the fourth; adolescents presented a higher contribution of sweets and pastry to total and saturated fat intakes and a lower contribution of soup and seafood to Na intake. All these differences were expected, based on the general reported differences according to age, with a lower consumption of seafood and soup and a higher consumption of sweets and pastry in younger ages(Reference Lien, Lytle and Klepp28Reference Marques-Vidal, Ravasco and Dias30).

Analysis of food sources according to individuals’ characteristics showed an important effect of socio-economic class. Adolescents of high socio-economic class seemed to present a healthier contribution of food groups to nutrient intake. In general, adolescents whose parents were more educated presented higher contributions from high-nutrient-dense foods (fruit and vegetables) to carbohydrate and fibre intakes and lower contributions of high-energy-dense foods (sweets and pastry) to energy, carbohydrates and fats. Our results are in accordance with previous data from a representative sample of Portuguese adults, which showed that a high educational level was related to a higher frequency of milk, vegetable soup, vegetable, fruit and fish consumption(Reference Moreira and Padrao31), and also with data from other countries(Reference Vlismas, Stavrinos and Panagiotakos10, Reference Petkeviciene, Klumbiene and Prattala32).

Overweight and obese adolescents presented a lower contribution of sweets and pastry to energy and other nutrients. This could be related to the previously described effect that obese adolescents under-report their food intake more than their normal-weight counterparts(Reference Bandini, Schoeller and Cyr33). On the other hand, as the present study was cross-sectional, these results might also be due to reverse causation, in which the temporal relationship between diet and weight is distorted – possibly overweight adolescents decreased food intake, and particularly some high-energy-dense foods, in order to lose weight.

In our work we used an FFQ and this method has some limitations in assessing dietary intake, such as using a predetermined food list that might not be representative of foods eaten by a specific population(Reference Willett34). Nevertheless, we believe that this possible bias had a very low effect, because this FFQ was validated for the adult population(Reference Lopes17, Reference Lopes, Aro and Azevedo18) and furthermore some foods or food groups eaten more frequently by the adolescent age group were included in the questionnaire. Moreover, in an open section, adolescents were also encouraged to list foods eaten at least once weekly that were not in the FFQ. However, the non-validation of the FFQ in adolescents may have led to some bias in the assessment of dietary intake and consequently to misclassification, and an overestimation was to be expected, particularly for fruit and vegetables, which are perceived as healthy and socially acceptable foods(Reference Hebert, Clemow and Pbert35).

Another limitation of the FFQ is the reliance on participants’ recall and the requirement of motivated participants, especially in self-administered questionnaires(Reference Willett34). Our FFQ was self-administered, but adolescents were given oral instructions on filling it in and written instructions were also sent home along with the questionnaire. Moreover, adolescents completed it with the help of their parents or legal guardians, which may have improved the quality of information. However, the extent to which parents might have an influence on overestimating healthy foods (according to what is socially acceptable) and on underestimating unhealthy foods is unknown.

Although the FFQ was filled in with the help of the parents, portion size information was not collected because Willett(Reference Willett34) suggests that to record information on portion size does not substantially improve the assessment of dietary intake, which may be even more relevant in adolescents who may have difficulty in estimating the portions and frequently ignore these questions when questionnaires are self-administered(Reference Subar, Thompson and Smith36).

Apart from the exclusions by total energy intake, we also excluded those participants with an intake of fruit or vegetables equal to or higher than 1·5 times the interquartile range. This decision was taken because of the expected overestimation in their consumption related with this method(Reference Amanatidis, Mackerras and Simpson37). Moreover, fruit and vegetables intake is assessed by a long list of different items, some of them consumed only seasonally, making the evaluation of their intake more difficult and more likely to be overestimated. Additionally, as they are not energy-dense foods, overestimating them might not be reflected in a high total energy intake so those participants would not be excluded by the criterion of the total energy intake.

Adolescents included in the present analysis were significantly more often female, with highly educated parents and more from private schools, compared with those excluded. This over-representation of adolescents from high social classes may affect the external validity of our results, because these participants over-represent food sources of a healthier dietary pattern. Thus, we can expect that the contribution from starchy foods to nutrient intake could be lower than that found in our sample and the contribution from sweets and pastry could be higher than that estimated by us.

Despite these limitations, our study is one of the few that has assessed the food sources of dietary intake in adolescents and the first in Portugal. To our knowledge, the articles that describe food sources in samples of adolescents are mostly from the 1990s and some of them describe food sources of only one nutrient(Reference Albertson, Tobelmann and Marquart38Reference O'Sullivan, Ambrosini and Beilin43). Their results might be not comparable with our data, due to changes in food and nutrient intakes in recent decades(Reference Alexy, Sichert-Hellert and Kersting44Reference Stahl, Vohmann and Richter46) and changes in food sources of energy and nutrients(Reference Cotton, Subar and Friday47, Reference Winkler, Doring and Keil48). In addition, our work is one of the few(Reference Hackett, Rugg-Gunn and Appleton49Reference Kenney, McCoy and Kirby51) that, in this age group, explores food sources by social, demographic and behavioural characteristics of the participants. Two of those studies(Reference Hackett, Rugg-Gunn and Appleton49, Reference Kenney, McCoy and Kirby51) were published in 1986 and the other one(Reference Gordon and McKinney50) only presents food sources according to participation in the National Food Lunch Program, in the USA. Since few data are published on this topic and because globalization appears to have contributed to the reduction in the differences in food intake between populations(Reference Iqbal, Anand and Ounpuu52), the data described here could be useful, not only for Portugal but also for health planning in other countries.

Conclusions

One quarter of energy intake was provided by starchy foods, and dairy foods plus meat accounted for another quarter. Starchy foods were also the major source of carbohydrates and fibre.

The contribution of meat to protein intake was more than double that of seafood, and meat was a major source of all types of fat. Sweets and pastry contributed more than 10 % to the intakes of energy, carbohydrates, total and saturated fat.

Parental education was the characteristic most related with food sources and a higher education was associated with a higher contribution from healthier food groups.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (POCTI/SAU-ESP/62399/2004). The authors declare no conflict of interests. J.A. drafted the first version of the manuscript, performed the statistical analysis and contributed to the interpretation of the analysis. M.S. performed the statistical analysis and contributed to the interpretation of the analysis. C.L. provided significant advice and contributed to the discussion of the manuscript. E.R. coordinated the manuscript and contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the analysis. All authors critically reviewed drafts of the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

1.World Health Organization (2008) 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/nmh/Actionplan-PC-NCD-2008.pdfGoogle Scholar
2.World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
3.World Health Organization (2002) The World Health Report 2002. Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/whr02_en.pdf.Google Scholar
4.Thomas, J (1991) Food choices and preferences of schoolchildren. Proc Nutr Soc 50, 4957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Shepherd, R & Dennison, CM (1996) Influences on adolescent food choice. Proc Nutr Soc 55, 345357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1996) Preparation and Use of Food-based Dietary Guidelines. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Consultation. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0243E/x0243e00.htmTopOfPageGoogle Scholar
7.Thompson, FE, Sowers, MF, JrFrongillo, EA et al. (1992) Sources of fiber and fat in diets of US women aged 19 to 50: implications for nutrition education and policy. Am J Public Health 82, 695702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.World Health Organization (2002) Food and Health in Europe: A New Basis for Action; Summary. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.euro.who.int/document/e78578.pdf.Google Scholar
9.Prattala, R, Hakala, S, Roskam, AJ et al. (2009) Association between educational level and vegetable use in nine European countries. Public Health Nutr 12, 21742182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Vlismas, K, Stavrinos, V & Panagiotakos, DB (2009) Socio-economic status, dietary habits and health-related outcomes in various parts of the world: a review. Cent Eur J Public Health 17, 5563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Hulshof, KF, Brussaard, JH, Kruizinga, AG et al. (2003) Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 128137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Thiele, S, Mensink, GB & Beitz, R (2004) Determinants of diet quality. Public Health Nutr 7, 2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Ramos, E & Barros, H (2007) Family and school determinants of overweight in 13-year-old Portuguese adolescents. Acta Paediatr 96, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ et al. (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122, 5165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Amaral, TF, Nogueira, C, Paiva, I et al. (1993) Weights and food portions. Rev Port Nutr 2, 1323 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
16.Lopes, C, Fernandes, PV & Barros, H (1994) Food frequency questionnaire – the effect of the food list extension on participants’ classification. Arq Med 8, 291294 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
17.Lopes, C (2000) Diet and myocardial infarction: a community-based case–control study. PhD Thesis, University of Porto (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
18.Lopes, C, Aro, A, Azevedo, A et al. (2007) Intake and adipose tissue composition of fatty acids and risk of myocardial infarction in a male Portuguese community sample. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 276286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Silva, D, Rego, C, Guerra, A et al. (2004) Characterization of food habits and comparative study between two methods of food assessment in adolescents. Rev Aliment Humana 10, 3340 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
20.World Health Organization (1988) Measuring Obesity: Classification and Description of Anthropometric Data. Report on a WHO Consultation on the Epidemiology of Obesity. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
21.Kuczmarski, RJ, Ogden, CL, Guo, SS et al. (2002) 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11, 1190.Google Scholar
22.Rodrigues, SS & de Almeida, MD (2001) Portuguese household food availability in 1990 and 1995. Public Health Nutr 4, 11671171.Google ScholarPubMed
23.DAFNE – DAta Food NEtworking (2005) Trends within a country. http://www.nut.uoa.gr/DafnesoftWeb/Main.aspx?type=trends (accessed March 2011).Google Scholar
24.He, K, Song, Y, Daviglus, ML et al. (2004) Accumulated evidence on fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Circulation 109, 27052711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Trichopoulou, A, Naska, A & Costacou, T (2002) Disparities in food habits across Europe. Proc Nutr Soc 61, 553558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.World Health Organization (1990) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO Technical Report Series no. 797. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
27.Lopes, C, Oliveira, A, Santos, AC et al. (2006) Consumo alimentar no Porto. Porto: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto; available at www.consumoalimentarporto.med.up.ptGoogle Scholar
28.Lien, N, Lytle, LA & Klepp, KI (2001) Stability in consumption of fruit, vegetables, and sugary foods in a cohort from age 14 to age 21. Prev Med 33, 217226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Smith, KM & Sahyoun, NR (2005) Fish consumption: recommendations versus advisories, can they be reconciled? Nutr Rev 63, 3946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Marques-Vidal, P, Ravasco, P, Dias, CM et al. (2006) Trends of food intake in Portugal, 1987–1999: results from the National Health Surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 14141422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Moreira, PA & Padrao, PD (2004) Educational and economic determinants of food intake in Portuguese adults: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 4, 58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32.Petkeviciene, J, Klumbiene, J, Prattala, R et al. (2007) Educational variations in the consumption of foods containing fat in Finland and the Baltic countries. Public Health Nutr 10, 518523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Bandini, LG, Schoeller, DA, Cyr, HN et al. (1990) Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 52, 421425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34.Willett, W (1998) Food-frequency methods. In Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed., pp. 74100. [W Willett, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Hebert, JR, Clemow, L, Pbert, L et al. (1995) Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 24, 389398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Subar, AF, Thompson, FE, Smith, AF et al. (1995) Improving food frequency questionnaires: a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 781788.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Amanatidis, S, Mackerras, D & Simpson, JM (2001) Comparison of two frequency questionnaires for quantifying fruit and vegetable intake. Public Health Nutr 4, 233239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Albertson, AM, Tobelmann, RC & Marquart, L (1997) Estimated dietary calcium intake and food sources for adolescent females: 1980–92. J Adolesc Health 20, 2026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39.Basch, CE, Shea, S & Zybert, P (1992) Food sources, dietary behavior, and the saturated fat intake of Latino children. Am J Public Health 82, 810815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Moynihan, P, Adamson, A, Rugg-Gunn, A et al. (1996) Dietary sources of calcium and the contribution of flour fortification to total calcium intake in the diets of Northumbrian adolescents. Br J Nutr 75, 495505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Nicklas, TA, Farris, RP, Myers, L et al. (1995) Dietary fiber intake of children and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 209214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Strain, JJ, Robson, PJ, Livingstone, MB et al. (1994) Estimates of food and macronutrient intake in a random sample of Northern Ireland adolescents. Br J Nutr 72, 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.O'Sullivan, TA, Ambrosini, G, Beilin, LJ et al. (2011) Dietary intake and food sources of fatty acids in Australian adolescents. Nutrition 27, 153159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44.Alexy, U, Sichert-Hellert, W & Kersting, M (2002) Fifteen-year time trends in energy and macronutrient intake in German children and adolescents: results of the DONALD study. Br J Nutr 87, 595604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Nicklas, TA, Demory-Luce, D, Yang, SJ et al. (2004) Children's food consumption patterns have changed over two decades (1973–1994): the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 11271140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46.Stahl, A, Vohmann, C, Richter, A et al. (2009) Changes in food and nutrient intake of 6- to 17-year-old Germans between the 1980s and 2006. Public Health Nutr 12, 19121923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47.Cotton, PA, Subar, AF, Friday, JE et al. (2004) Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1994 to 1996. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 921930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48.Winkler, G, Doring, A & Keil, U (2000) Trends in dietary sources of nutrients among middle-aged men in southern Germany. Results of the MONICA Project Augsburg: dietary surveys 1984/1985 and 1994/1995. MONItoring trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease. Appetite 34, 3745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49.Hackett, AF, Rugg-Gunn, AJ, Appleton, DR et al. (1986) Dietary sources of energy, protein, fat and fibre in 375 English adolescents. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 40, 176184.Google ScholarPubMed
50.Gordon, AR & McKinney, P (1995) Sources of nutrients in students’ diets. Am J Clin Nutr 61, 1 Suppl., 232S240S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Kenney, MA, McCoy, JH, Kirby, AL et al. (1986) Nutrients supplied by food groups in diets of teenaged girls. J Am Diet Assoc 86, 15491555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52.Iqbal, R, Anand, S, Ounpuu, S et al. (2008) Dietary patterns and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in 52 countries: results of the INTERHEART study. Circulation 118, 19291937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Description and comparison of participants’ characteristics, according to gender: 13-year-old adolescents, Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

Figure 1

Table 2 Proportional contribution of food groups to energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1522), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

Figure 2

Table 3 Adjusted odds ratio of having a higher†v. a lower contribution of the indicated food groups to daily energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1398), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year

Figure 3

Table 4 Adjusted odds ratio having a higher†v. a lower contribution of the indicated food groups to daily energy and nutrient intakes: 13-year-old adolescents (n 1398), Porto, Portugal, 2003/2004 school year