1. Introduction
Nowadays, one of the most popular classical functional inequalities in the analysis is the Hardy inequality:
which holds for all $u\in C_{c}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N \setminus \{o\})$. This range of p is called the supercritical case of the Hardy inequality in literature. Note that the inequality is also valid for all $u\in C_{c}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N)$ if N > p, that is, in the subcritical case. However, in the critical case N = p such inequality is not possible.
The inequality (1.1) is an essential higher dimensional extension of the one-dimensional inequality discovered by Hardy [Reference Hardy17]. The development of the famous Hardy inequality (in both its discrete and continuous forms) during the period 1906–1928 has its own history and we refer to [Reference Kufner, Maligranda and Persson21]. It is well-known that the so-called Hardy constant $\left|\frac{p}{N-p}\right|^{p}$ is sharp and never attained (except trivial function).
Therefore, one may want to improve (1.1) by adding extra non-negative terms on its left-hand side. Say p = 2 and N > 2, one may ask about the existence of non-negative function $W\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$ such that the following inequality:
holds for all $u\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N)$. But the operator $-\Delta_{\mathbb{R}^N}-\frac{(N-2)^2}{4}\frac{1}{|x|^2}$ is known to be a critical operator on $\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\{o\}$ (see [Reference Devyver, Fraas and Pinchover10]) and an improvement of such quadratic form inequality is not possible. Also, see [Reference Devyver and Pinchover11] for the optimal Lp Hardy-type inequalities. However, there is a huge set of references of works about improved Hardy inequalities on bounded Euclidean domains after the seminal works of Brezis and Marcus [Reference Brezis and Marcus6] and Brezis and Vázquez [Reference Brezis and Vázquez7]. See also [Reference Adimurthi and Sekar1, Reference Adimurthi, Chaudhuri and Ramaswamy2, Reference Vázquez and Zuazua31] and references therein.
The Hardy inequality (1.1) plays an important role in several branches of mathematics such as partial differential equations, spectral theory, geometry, functional analysis, etc. Improvements of the Hardy inequality on bounded Euclidean domains containing origin and improvements of such inequality on Riemannian manifolds have attracted great attention and were investigated by many authors. Without any claim of completeness, we refer an interested reader to [Reference Barbatis, Filippas and Tertikas3, Reference Barbatis, Filippas and Tertikas4, Reference Filippas and Tertikas12, Reference Gazzola, Grunau and Mitidieri15, Reference Ghoussoub and Moradifam16, Reference Ruzhansky and Suragan27, Reference Sano and Takahashi28] which are excellent monographs for reviews of this subject and for the improvements of this inequality.
Let p > N. In this paper, our main result states that for all $u\in C_{c}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N \setminus \{o\})$, the following new sharp inequality holds in terms of the polar coordinate structure of $\mathbb{R}^N$:
here r is the distance between a point $x\in\mathbb{R}^N$ and the origin o and $\mathbb{S}^{N-1}$ is the N-dimensional unit sphere. Clearly, we have (see Remark 4.1):
so that (1.2) gives an improvement of (1.1). The N = 1 case of (1.2) (see also Theorem 4.1) was established in the recent paper [Reference Frank, Laptev and Weidl14], that is, the authors proved the one dimensional L p-version of the improved Hardy inequality and gave an interesting application in the theory of Schrödinger operators. So, our inequality (1.2) extends the 1D Frank–Laptev–Weidl inequality from [Reference Frank, Laptev and Weidl14] to dimension $1\leq N \lt p$. The works on the one-dimensional (similar) improvements of the Hardy inequality go back to [Reference Kac and Krein19], and [Reference Tomaselli30], see also the introductory discussions in [Reference Frank, Laptev and Weidl14] and [Reference Roychowdhury and Suragan25] for the discrete versions.
First, we study the results for radial functions and then continue the discussion for the non-radial setup. One of the main tools we exploited is the norm-preservation of the symmetric decreasing rearrangements and in principle, one can see that this property holds on some Riemannian or/and sub-Riemannian manifolds. In the same spirit, our results can be extended to more general manifolds/spaces. Here are a few references [Reference Berchio, Ganguly and Roychowdhury5, Reference Carron8, Reference D’Ambrosio and Dipierro9, Reference Flynn, Lam, Lu and Mazumdar13, Reference Kombe and Ozaydin20, Reference Nguyen23, Reference Suragan, Cerejeiras and Reissig29, Reference Yang, Su and Kong32] to revisit the work on Hardy’s inequality in those spaces.
Structure of the paper: In $\S$ 2, we discuss some basic facts of symmetric decreasing rearrangements. Section 3 is devoted to the main supporting lemmas, and then a few necessary tools are discussed. In $\S$ 4, we prove our main results related to developing the new multidimensional Hardy inequality. Finally, in $\S$ 5, a novel uncertainty principle on Euclidean space is discussed.
2. Preliminaries
Before stating the main results and their consequences, first, we will describe some preliminaries on symmetric decreasing rearrangements. After that, in this section, we will shortly discuss the polar coordinate decomposition and the radial version of the classical gradient operator on the N-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^N$.
2.1. Symmetric decreasing rearrangements
Below we will quickly recall some definitions and facts about symmetric decreasing rearrangement. For more details, we refer to [Reference Lieb and Loss22, Chapter 3], for example.
Let $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N$ be a finite Borel measurable subset. Then the symmetrisation of Ω (denoted by $\Omega^*$) is defined by the open ball $B(o\:;\:r):=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^N\::\:|x| \lt r\}$, where $r=v_N^{-1/N}\text{vol}(\Omega)^{1/N}$ is the radius, where vN is the volume of the unit N-dimensional Euclidean ball and o is the origin as the centre of the ball. Here we are only concerned with functions which vanish at infinity. For a real number $\beta\in \mathbb{R}$, the level set $\{f \gt \beta\}$ of a function f is denoted as:
We say that a function f vanishes at infinity if:
Now for all $x\in \mathbb{R}^N$, we define the symmetric decreasing rearrangement (or non-increasing rearrangement) of f, denoted by $f^*$, as follows:
Then by definition, $f^*$ becomes a non-negative, radially symmetric, and non-increasing function. Therefore, for any $x\in \mathbb{R}^N$, we have $f^*(x)=f^*(|x|)$ and one can consider $f^*$ as a real valued non-negative function on $[0,\infty)$. Irrespective of several properties of $f^*$, a useful property in our context is:
By using the layer cake representation and the above property, we have the following identity:
This relation will be very useful in the proofs.
2.2. Polar coordinates and radial gradient
Let $\mathbb{R}^N$ be the N-dimensional Euclidean space with Lebesgue measure ${\rm d}x$. Then, it admits the polar coordinate decomposition with respect to the origin $o\in \mathbb{R}^N$. In particular, for any $f\in L^1_{loc}(\mathbb{R}^N)$ we have,
where for any $x\in \mathbb{R}^N$ we write $x=(r,\sigma)\in [0,\infty)\times \mathbb{S}^{N-1}$ with $r=\varrho(x,o)$ (also denoted as $|x|$) being the Euclidean distance between x and the fixed point o as the origin. Here and after $\mathbb{S}^{N-1}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^N\: : \:|x|=1\}$ is the N-dimensional unit sphere with the surface measure $\:{\rm d}\sigma$.
We say that a function is radially symmetric if it depends only on the radial part. That is, if f(x) is a radial function, then for any $x\in\mathbb{R}^N$, we have,
and f can be considered as a function on $[0,\infty)$. Note that the radial gradient of a differentiable function f(x) can be defined by:
where ‘·’ is the scalar product and $\nabla$ is the usual gradient on $\mathbb{R}^N$.
3. Supporting lemmas
This section deals with the establishment of some supporting results. First, we describe the weighted version of the Hardy inequality on the half-line involving symmetric decreasing (or non-increasing) rearrangement of the function. The arguments here follow [Reference Frank, Laptev and Weidl14] but extend those.
Lemma 3.1. Let $1 \lt p \lt \infty$. Let g be any non-negative function on $(0,\infty)$. Assume h is a strictly positive non-decreasing function on $(0,\infty)$ such that $s h(r)\leq r h(s)$ for any $r,s\in(0,\infty)$ with $r\leq s$. Let f be a locally absolutely continuous function on $(0,\infty)$. Then, we have
where $f^*$ is the non-increasing rearrangement of f.
Proof. For any fixed r > 0, we have
The above follows from
The advantage of $f^*$ is that it is non-increasing and this fact enables computing the supremum.
Case 1: Let $0 \lt s\leq r \lt \infty$. Then using the non-decreasing property of h, we have
Case 2: Let $0 \lt r\leq s \lt \infty$. Then exploiting the increasing property of h and the non-increasing nature of $f^*$ and a change of variable, we obtain
Thus, combining both cases, for all $r,s\in (0,\infty)$ we have,
It yields
which completes the proof.
Let us consider a special case in Lemma 3.1.
Corollary 3.1. Let $1\leq N \lt p \lt \infty$. Then for all $f\in C_c^\infty(0,\infty)$ the following weighted inequality holds:
where $f^*$ is the non-increasing rearrangement of f.
Proof. Let us set $g(r)=r^{N-1}$ and $h(r)=r$ for $r\in (0,\infty)$. Substituting these in Lemma 3.1, we have,
Using the weighted one dimensional Lp-Hardy inequality (see [Reference Hardy, Littlewood and Pólya18, Theorem 330], or e.g. [Reference Ruzhansky, Shriwastawa and Tiwari26, Theorem 3.1]) for the function $\int_{0}^{r}f^*(t)\:{\rm d}t$ and noticing the fact $\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\int_{0}^{r}f^*(t)\:{\rm d}t=f^*(r)$ which follows from the fundamental theorem of calculus, we obtain:
Applying this to the right-hand side of (3.3), we obtain (3.2).
Remark 3.1. Inequality (3.2) is a key ingredient in our proof. However, we are unable to prove this inequality when p < N. The reason is that the main tool in the above proof, the Hardy inequality in that form is valid if and only if p > N (see, e.g. [Reference Persson and Samko24, Example 1.1]). Therefore, the latter inequality (3.4) does not hold when p < N. This technical challenge enables us to follow the Frank–Laptev–Weidl approach to obtain an improved version of the multidimensional Hardy inequality in the subcritical case p < N. It makes the subcritical improvement of the Hardy inequality an open problem.
For a continuous function on a compact set, the supremum is attained, and exploiting this idea, one can have the following result.
Lemma 3.2. Let $g\in C(\mathbb{R}^N)$ be a non-negative function. Then, on a compact subset $\mathcal{K}\subset\mathbb{R}^N$, we have,
for $1\leq p \lt \infty$.
4. Improvement of the classical Hardy inequality
This section’s primary goal is to establish an improved version of the classical Hardy inequality on the N-dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^N$ in the supercritical case. Our strategy is first to develop it for radial functions, and then, by using the radialisation technique, we settle the non-radial version.
4.1. Radial version of the results
First, we present the results for the compactly supported smooth radial function space denoted as $C_{c,rad}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus \{o\})$.
Theorem 4.1. Let $1\leq N \lt p \lt \infty$. Then we have
for all $u\in C_{c,rad}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus \{o\})$.
Proof. Since $u\in C_{c,rad}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus \{o\})$ we have $u(y)=u(|y|)=u(s)$ for $s=|y|$, that is, $u\in C_c^\infty(0,\infty)$. Recall the polar coordinate decomposition $x=(r,\sigma)$ where $r=|x|\in (0,\infty)$ and $\sigma=\frac{x}{|x|}\in \mathbb{S}^{N-1}$. Then, we deduce
Before going further let us mention the following identity:
By using this and continuing with the polar coordinate decomposition (4.2), we have
In the middle we have used Corollary 3.1 for $f(t)=\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}(t)$. Finally, by using (2.1) for the function $\frac{\partial u}{\partial r}$ which vanishes at infinity because of the compact support of the smooth function u and by using the identity (2.3) the desired result follows.
4.2. Non-radial setting of the results
Now we describe the non-radial version of Theorem 4.1. Before that, it should be mentioned that in constructing some non-radial inequality from the radial one, the radialisation method is one of the common tools of functional inequalities. Let $u\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$, then for any $1 \lt p \lt \infty$, we define the radial symmetric function $\tilde{u}$ as follows:
where $r=|x|$, $\sigma=\frac{x}{|x|}$, and ωN is the surface area of the N-dimensional sphere $\mathbb{S}^{N-1}$.
Lemma 4.1. Let $1 \lt p \lt \infty$ and let f be any non-negative measurable radial function on $\mathbb{R}^N$. Then for any $u\in C^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$, we have:
where $\tilde{u}(x)$ is the earlier defined radial symmetric version of u(x).
Proof. Let $u\in C^1(\mathbb{R}^N)$. By using the Hölder inequality, we have:
Now multiplying both sides by f(x) and exploiting the above we derive:
Starting with the polar coordinate decomposition, in between, we have used Fubini’s theorem to arrive at the inequality (4.3).
Now we proceed with another important lemma.
Lemma 4.2. Let $1\leq p \lt \infty$ and let f be a non-negative measurable radial weight function on $\mathbb{R}^N$. Then for any $u\in C_c(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\{o\})$, we have:
where $\tilde{u}(x)$ is the earlier defined radial symmetric version of u(x).
Proof. Setting $s=|y|$ and $r=|x|$ and using polar coordinates, we compute
Here we have used the fact $\int\max\{a(x),b(x)\}\,\:{\rm d}x\geq \max\{\int a(x)\,\:{\rm d}x,\int b(x)\,\:{\rm d}x\}$.
We are now in a position to derive the non-radial version of the result from the previous subsection which is the main contribution of this note.
Theorem 4.2. Let $1\leq N \lt p \lt \infty$. Then, for all $u\in C_{c}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N \setminus \{o\})$, we have
with the sharp constant. More precisely, the Hardy constant $\big|\frac{p}{N-p}\big|^p$ is sharp in the sense that no inequality of the form
holds, for all $ u \in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^N \setminus \{o\})$, when $C \lt \big|\frac{p}{N-p}\big|^p$.
Proof. Let $u\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N \setminus \{o\})$ and $\tilde{u}$ be the radial symmetric function associated to it. Then exploiting Lemma 4.2 with $f(x)=1$ and then substituting the result into Theorem 4.1, we deduce
Next, using Lemma 4.1 with $f(x)=1$, we have
Finally, combining the above two estimates we obtain
which is the desired result (4.5). The sharpness follows from the known sharp constant in the classical setup.
Remark 4.1. On the left-hand side of (4.5), we have
By using Gauss’s lemma on the right-hand side of (4.5), we get
Combining the above two facts, we conclude that (4.5) is an improvement of the sharp Hardy inequality.
5. Uncertainty principle
In this section, we focus on the Heisenberg–Pauli–Weyl (HPW) type uncertainty principle, which can be obtained immediately from the obtained new version of the Hardy inequality. The HPW uncertainty principle has several physical and mathematical applications. In physics, uncertainty principles may be used for establishing the stability of matter. In quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle implies that both the momentum and the position of an object cannot be exactly measured at the same time. The most well-known mathematical formulation of the uncertainty principle is probably the HPW uncertainty principle. First, we present the result for radial functions and then for the non-radial setting.
Theorem 5.1. Let $1\leq N \lt p \lt \infty$. Then, for any $u\in C_{c,rad}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus \{o\})$, the following uncertainty principle holds:
Proof. For $u\in C_{c,rad}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\{o\})$ we estimate each term separately. Let us begin with
In the above, we have used the Hölder inequality, Lemma 3.2 twice, and finally Theorem 4.1 step by step. Exploiting the similar steps as earlier, we compute
Finally, combining both cases, we arrive at the desired result.
Now, we state the version for non-radial functions.
Theorem 5.2. Let $1\leq N \lt p \lt \infty$. Then for any $u\in C_{c}^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus \{o\})$, the following uncertainty principle holds:
Proof. Let $u\in C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^N\setminus\{o\})$ and using polar coordinates we have,
In the above, we have exploited the Hölder inequality, Lemma 3.2, and finally Theorem 4.2 step by step. Following the similar steps as earlier, we compute:
By combining both cases, we immediately arrive at the desired result.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Rupert Frank for pointing out a problem in the first version of this paper. This project was discussed when the authors met at the Ghent Analysis & PDE Center at Ghent University in the Summer of 2022. P. R. and D. S. would like to thank the university for their support and hospitality.
Funding statement
This research was funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Kazakhstan (grant no. AP23488549). It was also funded by the Nazarbayev University grant 20122022FD4105. The authors were supported by the FWO Odysseus 1 grant G.0H94.18N: Analysis and Partial Differential Equations and by the Methusalem program of the Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF) (grant no. 01M01021). M. R. was also supported by EPSRC (grant no. EP/R003025/2). P. R was also supported by National Theoretical Science Research Center Operational Plan (project no. 112L104040).