Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T18:56:00.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to the letter on ‘Meat intake and type 2 diabetes among Japanese workers’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2024

Akiko Nanri*
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Health Sciences, International College of Arts and Sciences, Fukuoka Women’s University, Fukuoka, Japan Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Tetsuya Mizoue
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Akiko Nanri; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Dear Editor,

We appreciate Dr. Joseph’s insightful comment on our paper reporting no association between red and processed meat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers(Reference Nanri, Irie and Kochi1). Although this finding is inconsistent with the results of Western studies, it is supported by Japanese studies reporting no association between dietary patterns characterised by high meat and processed meat intake (referred to as the ‘Westernised dietary pattern,’ ‘high-fat dietary pattern’ and ‘animal food dietary pattern’) and type 2 diabetes(Reference Mizoue, Yamaji and Tabata2Reference Nanri, Shimazu and Takachi4).

Of the factors that could influence the meat–diabetes association, the amount and type of red meat would be plausible explanations for our null finding. Specifically, red meat intake is lower in Japanese than in Westerners; the per capita annual intake of red meat (beef and pork combined) was 32·3 kg in Japan, compared with 67·9 kg in the USA and 43·5 kg in the UK(5). In addition, the type of red meat commonly consumed differs; beef accounted for 29 % of red meat in Japan, compared with 56 % in the USA and 40 % in the UK(5). Pork is rich in vitamin B1 and linoleic acid(6,Reference Vicente and Pereira7) , both of which have been associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes(Reference Hu, Fang and Zhang8,Reference Ziegler, Reiners and Strom9) . Compared with pork, beef contains higher levels of Fe(6), which has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes(Reference Shahinfar, Jayedi and Shab-Bidar10).

Studies in Asia may provide additional insight. A recent region-specific meta-analysis by Li et al. found a significantly higher risk of type 2 diabetes associated with higher intake of unprocessed red meat in the Western Pacific region(Reference Li, Bishop and Imamura11). However, they also noted significant heterogeneity among the seven studies included in the meta-analysis, with only two (China and Singapore) showing a significant increase in diabetes risk associated with higher unprocessed red meat intake. Interestingly, three studies from Australia, where red meat consumption is relatively high (52·6 kg/capita/year)(5), reported no association(Reference Li, Bishop and Imamura11). These data suggest that the association between red meat and diabetes cannot be explained by intake alone. In this regard, we agree that intake of foods other than red meat (e.g. fish, beans, vegetables and fruits), dietary culture, including cooking methods, and lifestyle may have influenced the association. These issues should be addressed in future studies to clarify whether red meat and processed meat increase the risk of type 2 diabetes.

Acknowledgements

There are no conflicts of interest.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Nanri, A, Irie, S, Kochi, T, et al. (2024) Meat intake and type 2 diabetes among Japanese workers: a prospective study. Br J Nutr 132, 624630.Google ScholarPubMed
Mizoue, T, Yamaji, T, Tabata, S, et al. (2006) Dietary patterns and glucose tolerance abnormalities in Japanese men. J Nutr 136, 13521358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanri, A, Mizoue, T, Yoshida, D, et al. (2008) Dietary patterns and A1C in Japanese men and women. Diabetes Care 31, 15681573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanri, A, Shimazu, T, Takachi, R, et al. (2013) Dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 1824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAO FAOSTAT. Food Balances (2010-). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed November 2024).Google Scholar
Ministry of Education C, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (2020) Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan -2020- Eighth Revised Edition. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/syokuhinseibun/mext_01110.html (accessed November 2024).Google Scholar
Vicente, F & Pereira, PC (2024) Pork meat composition and health: a review of the evidence. Foods 13, 1905.Google Scholar
Hu, M, Fang, Z, Zhang, T, et al. (2022) Polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in adults: a dose response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Diabetol Metab Syndr 14, 34.Google ScholarPubMed
Ziegler, D, Reiners, K, Strom, A, et al. (2023) Association between diabetes and thiamine status – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 144, 155565.Google ScholarPubMed
Shahinfar, H, Jayedi, A & Shab-Bidar, S (2022) Dietary iron intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Nutr 61, 22792296.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, C, Bishop, TRP, Imamura, F, et al. (2024) Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100 000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 12, 619630.Google ScholarPubMed