Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:13:21.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Certification of standard reference material 1878b respirable α-quartz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2016

David R. Black ,
Marcus H. Mendenhall ,
Pamela S. Whitfield ,
Donald Windover ,
Albert Henins ,
James Filliben  and
James P. Cline
David R. Black*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Marcus H. Mendenhall
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Pamela S. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Lab, Spallation Neutron Source, PO Box 2008, MS-6475, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Donald Windover
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Albert Henins
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
James Filliben
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
James P. Cline
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) certifies a suite of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) to address specific aspects of the performance of X-ray powder diffraction instruments. This report describes SRM 1878b, the third generation of this powder diffraction SRM. SRM 1878b is intended for use in the preparation of calibration standards for the quantitative analyses of α-quartz by X-ray powder diffraction in accordance to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Analytical Method 7500, or equivalent. A unit of SRM 1878b consists of approximately 5 g of α-quartz powder bottled in an argon atmosphere. It is certified with respect to crystalline phase purity, or amorphous phase content, and lattice parameter. Neutron powder diffraction, both time of flight and constant wavelength, was used to certify the phase purity using SRM 676a as an internal standard. A NIST-built diffractometer, incorporating many advanced design features was used for certification measurements for lattice parameters.

Keywords

standard reference materialX-ray diffractioncertificationlattice parameterdiffractometer
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 211 - 215
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, D., Windover, D., Henins, A., Filliben, J. J., and Cline, J. P. (2011). “Certification of standard reference material 660B,” Powder Diffr. 26(2), 155–158.Google Scholar
Cheary, R. W., Coelho, A. A. (1992) “A fundamental parameters approach to X-ray line-profile fitting,” J. Appl. Cryst., 25, 109–121.Google Scholar
Cheary, R. W., Coelho, A. A. (1998a) “Axial divergence in a conventional X-ray powder diffractometer II, implementation and comparison with experiment,” J. Appl. Crystallogr., 31, 862–868.Google Scholar
Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. A. (1998b). “Axial divergence in a conventional X-ray powder diffractometer I. theoretical foundations,” J. Appl. Crystallogr., 31, 851–861.Google Scholar
Cline, J. P., Mendenhall, M. H., Black, D., Windover, D., and Henins, A. (2015). “The optics, alignment and calibration of laboratory X-ray powder diffraction equipment with the use of NIST standard reference materials,” J. Res. NIST 120, 173–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, J. P., Von Dreele, R. B., Winburn, R., Stephens, P. W., and Filliben, J. J. (2011). “Addressing the amorphous content issue in quantitative phase analysis, the certification of NIST standard reference material 676a,” Acta Crystallogr. A67, 357–367.Google Scholar
Eller, P. and Cassinelli, M., Eds. (1994). NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), 4th ed., (DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113).Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E., and Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). “A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27, 892–900.Google Scholar
Garlea, V. O., Chakoumakos, B. C., Moore, S. A., Taylor, G. B., Chae, T., Maples, R. G., Riedel, R. A., Lynn, G. W., and Selby, D. L. (2010). “The high-resolution powder diffractometer at the high flux isotope reactor,” Appl. Phys. A 99(3), 531–535.Google Scholar
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). (2008). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM/WG 1). Available at: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html Google Scholar
Hölzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., Härtwig, J., and Förster, E. (1997). “Kα 1,2 and Kβ1,3 X-ray emission lines of the 3d transition metals,” Phys. Rev. A 56(6), 4554–4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huq, A., Hodges, J. P., Gourdon, O., and Heroux, L. (2011). “Powgen: a third-generation high-resolution high-throughput powder diffraction instrument at the spallation neutron source,” Z. Kristallogr. Proc. 1, 127–135, DOI 10.1524/zkpr.2011.0019.Google Scholar
ISO 7708 (1995). Air Quality – Particle Size Fraction Definitions for Health-related Sampling ISO Standard 7708. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Documents/OEL/02.%20Kuempel/References/ISO_1995-Report%20No%207708.pdf (accessed June 2015).Google Scholar
JCGM 100 (2008). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement; (GUM 1995 with Minor Corrections), Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). Available at: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf (accessed June 2015).Google Scholar
Kosinski, J. A., Gualtieri, J. G., and Ballato, A. (1992). “Thermoelastic coefficients of alpha quartz,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 39(4), 502–7.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (2003). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS), (Report LAUR 86–748). (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM).Google Scholar
Mendenhall, M. H., Mullen, K., and Cline, J. P. (2015). “An implementation of the fundamental parameters approach for analysis of X-ray powder diffraction line profiles,” J. Res. NIST 120, 223–251.Google Scholar
SRM 660b (2010). Line Position and Line Shape Standard for Powder Diffraction (National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD).Google Scholar
SRM 676a (2012). Alumina Powder for Quantitative Analysis by X-ray Diffraction (National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. N. and Kuyatt, C. E. (1994). Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC). http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/ Google Scholar
The International System of Units (SI) (2006). (8th ed.), ISBN 92-822-2213-6. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_brochure_8_en.pdf, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, Sèvres, France.Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., and Hastings, J. B. (1987). “Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3 ,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20, 79–83.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor (2015). Office of the Federal Register, and Government Printing Office. TABLE Z-3 Mineral Dusts from e-CFR Title 29, Subtitle B, Chapter XVII, Part 1910, Subpart Z, 1910.1000. Available at: http://www.ecfr.gov/. (accessed 10 Jun 2015).Google Scholar
Von Dreele, R. B., Jorgensen, J. D., and Windsor, C. G. (1982). “Rietveld refinement with spallation neutron powder diffraction data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 15, 581–589.Google Scholar