Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:10:09.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineral extinction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2019

Stuart J. Mills*
Affiliation:
Geosciences, Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
Andrew G. Christy
Affiliation:
Geosciences, The Queensland Museum, 122 Gerler Road, Hendra, Queensland 4011, Australia School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
*
*Author for correspondence: Stuart J. Mills, Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Mineral evolution’ has attracted much attention in the last decade as a counterpart of the long-established biological concept, but is there a corresponding ‘mineral extinction’? We present new geochronological data from uranium-bearing secondary minerals and show that they are relatively recent, irrespective of the age of their primary uranium sources. The secondary species that make up much of the diversity of minerals appear to be ephemeral, and many may have vanished from the geological record without trace. Nevertheless, an ‘extinct’ mineral species can recur when physiochemical conditions are appropriate. This reversibility of ‘extinction’ highlights the limitations of the ‘evolution’ analogy. Mineral occurrence may be time-dependent but does not show the unique contingency between precursor and successor species that is characteristic of biological evolution.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019 

Introduction

Over the last decade, parallels have been drawn between well-established aspects of evolution and diversity in the biological world and the increase in diversity and complexity of mineral species through the past 4.5 billion years of Earth history. This similarity launched the concept of ‘mineral evolution’, which was initially mooted by Zhabin (Reference Zhabin1979) and then by Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Papineau, Bleeker, Downs, Ferry, McCoy, Sverjensky and Yang2008). It was subsequently expanded upon in papers such as: Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Liu, Downs, Golden, Pires, Grew, Hystad, Estrada and Sverjensky2014), Grew et al. (Reference Grew, Krivovichev, Hazen and Hystad2016), Krivovichev et al. (Reference Krivovichev, Krivovichev and Hazen2017) and Grew et al. (Reference Grew, Hystad, Toapanta, Eleish, Ostroverkhova, Golden and Hazen2019), along with the related idea of ‘mineral ecology’ (Hazen et al., Reference Hazen, Grew, Downs, Golden and Hystad2015). The generalisation of evolutionary phenomena to non-biological complex systems was discussed in general terms by Hazen and Eldredge (Reference Hazen and Eldredge2010). The concept of evolution through geological time in mineralogy has had a significant impact on communication of the science and now underpins displays in major museums such as ‘Die Evolution der Minerale’ gallery at the Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, Austria (Koeberl et al., Reference Koeberl, Brandstätter, Harzhauser and Riedl-Dorn2018) and The Mignone Halls of Gems and Minerals at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH, 2017). However, the analogy should be applied with caution, given the fundamental difference in underlying ‘evolutionary’ principles. The analogy arises in part because the living and non-living spheres have interacted and co-evolved (Stewart, Reference Stewart2014). However, we raise the question of how far it can be applied: in particular, whether ‘extinction’ of minerals occurs as it does in biologic systems.

The biological world shows a broad pattern of increasing functional and structural complexity through time, which is shared by minerals despite the absence of genetically-based phylogeny. Organisms can die out, leaving no progeny, although structurally and functionally convergent species can arise to fill similar ecological niches in other places and times through selection pressures. The explosion in the complexity of life seems more subdued once it is acknowledged that 99.9% of biological species are extinct rather than extant (Raup, Reference Raup1986; Newman, Reference Newman1997). The secular diversification of the mineral world may also be modulated by analogous ‘mineral extinction’. We have studied the geochronology of some ‘secondary’ uranium minerals derived by alteration of ‘primary’ uranium source minerals of known age, and found the results to have important implications for the nature of ‘mineral extinction’. The rationale, methods and results of this work are presented and discussed below.

Experimental rationale

The majority of the ca. 5500 known mineral species formed near the Earth's surface, at pressures and temperatures close to ambient relative to the full range of geologically possible conditions. They may form as primary precipitates from liquids and condensates from gases, or through alteration or replacement of other solid phases. In particular, Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Papineau, Bleeker, Downs, Ferry, McCoy, Sverjensky and Yang2008) noted that more than half of known species are hydrated and/or oxidised products formed by reaction of earlier minerals with oxygenated water and that this proportion is even higher for some chemical subclasses: ~80% in the case of uranium minerals. Thus, any count of mineral species at a particular locality or for a particular constituent element is likely to be dominated by such secondary species, and it is meaningful to make a distinction between these and the ‘primary’ minerals whose formation did not involve extensive interaction with the atmosphere and hydrosphere.

For the purposes of the present study, we define ‘secondary’ parageneses to be those where minerals have crystallised after at least partial dissolution of precursors under near-surface conditions by fluids with a substantial meteoric-water component. This is consistent with the idea that such minerals tend to be oxidised, as rain and groundwater are sources of oxygen under modern atmospheric conditions. The depths that such fluids can reach thus determine the possible range of pressure–temperature conditions for such secondary mineralisation. The deepest aquifer on Earth, the Great Artesian Basin of Australia, carries meteoric-sourced water down to a depth of 3 km (300 bars lithostatic pressure, close to that of the critical point for water). At a typical geothermal gradient of 25°C/km, this depth corresponds to a temperature of 100°C, but is very far below the boiling point of pure water at that pressure.

Tectonic and atmospheric conditions on Earth have changed through geological time, and it has become evident that this exerts a profound effect on the numbers and abundances of mineral species that have been able to form in different geological periods. This time-dependence has been termed ‘mineral evolution’. The paper by Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Papineau, Bleeker, Downs, Ferry, McCoy, Sverjensky and Yang2008) defined ten mineral-evolutionary stages in the history of the Earth, which correspond to pauses between pulses in the rate of appearance of new mineral species, and can be correlated with changes in the behaviour of the lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere and biosphere. A subsequent series of papers examined this evolutionary behaviour in more detail for minerals of specific chemical elements (e.g. Hazen et al., Reference Hazen, Ewing and Sverjensky2009, Reference Hazen, Golden, Downs, Hystad, Grew, Azzolini and Sverjensky2012; Grew et al., Reference Grew, Krivovichev, Hazen and Hystad2016). The change in mineralogical makeup of the crust has controlled age distributions of metallogenesis for various elements (Hazen et al., Reference Hazen, Liu, Downs, Golden, Pires, Grew, Hystad, Estrada and Sverjensky2014) and has been associated intimately with biological activity (‘coevolution of life and minerals’) since the Archaean, as shown by the occurrence of stromatolites at 3.5 Ga (Vasconcelos and McKenzie, Reference Vasconcelos and McKenzie2009). There has also been a consistent trend towards mineral species showing a greater range of chemical and structural complexity through time (Krivovichev et al., Reference Krivovichev, Krivovichev and Hazen2017). One methodological limitation for this type of study is that geochronological data for localities is limited, and data for one mineral of an element have been assumed to apply for all associated minerals of that element, irrespective of their primary or secondary nature. This is immaterial if the secondary species formed relatively soon after the primary minerals and have been preserved with them, but otherwise may overestimate the age of the first appearance for the secondary species, as acknowledged by Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Golden, Downs, Hystad, Grew, Azzolini and Sverjensky2012). The study of boron mineral evolution by Grew et al. (Reference Grew, Krivovichev, Hazen and Hystad2016) showed that the cumulative increase in species and complexity remains in that case, even when blatantly ephemeral recent products are removed from the database for each locality.

Uranium minerals are particularly amenable to geological dating from very small samples, as the predominant isotope 238U is a major constituent of the total U content (97.3 at.%) and radioactive with a half-life comparable to the age of the Earth. Today, uranium occurs in multiple valence states: as relatively immobile U4+ in a small number of very insoluble primary minerals, such as uraninite (ideally UO2); as U6+ in a much larger number of species containing the relatively mobile, soluble uranyl cation [UO2]2+, such as torbernite and francevillite (Fig. 1); and rarely as the intermediate U5+ in minerals such as wyartite. The enhanced mobility and ability to form a wide range of mineral structures leads to the great diversity of U6+ minerals under near-surface conditions (Burns et al., Reference Burns, Ewing and Hawthorne1997; Lussier et al., Reference Lussier, Lopez and Burns2016). Thus, uranium mineral diversity has evolved markedly through geological time (Hazen et al., Reference Hazen, Ewing and Sverjensky2009), from the anoxic conditions of the Archaean, dominated by primary and detrital deposits of U4+ minerals, through to the present day, when such deposits oxidise readily to produce a profusion of U6+ secondary species. Oxidation also produces dissolved [UO2]2+, which in turn can be transported and reduced again through contact with organic matter to produce tertiary U4+ deposits such as those impregnating sandstones of the Colorado Plateau.

Fig. 1. (a) Torbernite on kasolite from Shinkolobwe, DRC; (b) chervetite on francevillite from Mounana mine, Gabon. Field of view ~2.5 mm across. Collection Valérie Galea-Clolus.

Hazen et al. (Reference Hazen, Ewing and Sverjensky2009) note that some U6+ would have formed through radiation-induced auto-oxidation even in the anoxic Archaean, and that formation of hydrothermal uraninite by reduction from uranyl-bearing fluids became important after the Great Oxidation Event of ~2.2 Ga ago, as evidenced by divergence in the geochemical behaviour of U from that of Th, which does not have a mobile hexavalent state. Their deduction that most uranyl minerals only appeared after the Great Oxidation Event seems entirely reasonable. However, ages determined directly from secondary uranyl minerals are scarce in the literature. In this study, we present geochronological data for secondary U minerals from deposits with a wide range of overall age and show that in all cases the secondary minerals are of recent origin, irrespective of the age of the primary U source.

Methods

Single crystals were handpicked from specimens in the geological collections of Museums Victoria, Australia (Table 1). The crystals or fragments were weighed into Savillex PFA beakers and dissolved in 1 ml of 7M HNO3 for 3 days (100°C, capped beaker). On the basis of preliminary tests which indicated high to very high U concentrations and/or high U/Th, small splits of each solution were mixed and equilibrated with a 233U–229Th tracer. Given the very small sample sizes, these mixtures could be analysed in the mass spectrometer without further matrix removal by ion exchange. Isotopic analyses were carried out on a Nu Plasma multi-collector ICP-MS at the University of Melbourne, using a parallel ion-counting method which measures 234U/238U and 230Th/238U activity ratios in a single mass-spectrometer run, with full internal calibration of ion counter gains and mass bias (Hellstrom, Reference Hellstrom2003; Drysdale et al., Reference Drysdale, Paul, Hellstrom, Couchoud, Greig, Bajo, Zanchetta, Isola, Spötl, Baneschi, Regattieri and Woodhead2012). A solution of Harwell uraninite (HU-1), assumed to be in secular equilibrium (McCulloch and Esat, Reference McCulloch and Esat2000), was used to monitor instrument performance and drift, and provide an estimate of external precision. Further details are given in Supplementary Table S1.

Table 1. U–Th dating samples from a variety of worldwide deposits.

*Formulae: sklodowskite, Mg(UO2)2(SiO3OH)2·6H2O; parsonsite, Pb2(UO2)(PO4)2; saléeite, Mg(UO2)2(PO4)2·10H2O; dewindtite, H2Pb3(UO2)2(PO4)4O4·12H2O; tyuyamunite, Ca(UO2)2(VO4)2·5–8H2O; francevillite, Ba(UO2)2(VO4)2·5H2O; torbernite, Cu(UO2)2(PO4)2·12H2O; chervetite, Pb2(V2O7); mounanaite, PbFe2(VO4)2(OH,F)2; moctezumite, Pb(UO2)(TeO3)2; schmitterite, (UO2)(TeO3).

**Lat/Long: Eva mine: 17°40′48″S, 137°48′36″E; Ranger mine: 12°41′S, 132°55′E; Musonoi mine: 10°43′37″S, 25°27′10″E; Sleisbeck mine: 13°46′51″S, 132°49′36″E; Shinkolobwe mine: 11°2′54″S, 26°33′2″E; Mounana mine: 1°23′54″S, 13°09′09″E; Moctezuma mine: 29°48′N, 109°40′W.

Discussion

We studied samples from a range of geological provinces in the world including those in the Northern Territory, Australia, where the uraninite ages are ~1700 and ~900 Ma; Shaba, Democratic Republic of Congo (560–500 and 650 Ma); the Moctezuma mines in Sonora, Mexico (76–50 Ma); and the natural fission reactor in Gabon (~2 Ga). While the ages determined for the secondary minerals differ (Table 1), they are geologically young for all host deposits (< 503 ka; Table 1). These results are consistent with those we obtained in Birch et al. (Reference Birch, Mills, Maas and Hellstrom2011) for samples of saléeite, ulrichite, torbernite and metanatroautunite from the Lake Boga granite (367 Ma, Mills et al., Reference Mills, Birch, Maas, Phillips and Plimer2008) and Wycheproof granite (410 Ma) in Victoria, Australia. At those localities, 77 of the 104 samples gave apparent ages <500 ka, with a broad peak of ~400 ka (Marine Isotope Stage 11).

We note that a few studies have found pre-Holocene secondary uranium minerals, but none older than late Miocene. Dill et al. (Reference Dill, Gerdes and Weber2010) have reported torbernite up to 8.4 Ma occurring in the Bohemian massif of Germany and 1.61 Ma in Galicia, Spain (Dill et al., Reference Dill, Gerdes and Weber2011). These ages are still much younger than their primary U sources in Variscan granite.

The young ages determined from all of the uranyl minerals that we have examined to date emphasises the fact that these are relatively soluble, reactive species that are easily redissolved over long periods of geological time (Fig. 2). While not ephemeral on the scale of years like many evaporite species, they can be regarded as such on the scale of millions of years. Secondary minerals that formed 2.2 Ga ago will not have been preserved intact through that time, except in the rare instances where they are protected as inclusions in some more refractory phase (e.g. Grew, Reference Grew2017). The same is true for any oxidised secondary minerals that may have formed earlier. The hydrosphere and atmosphere appear to have transitioned to a consistently oxygenated state only after a few hundred million years of oscillations (Koehler et al., Reference Koehler, Buick, Kipp, Stüeken and Zaloumis2018), and there is evidence for locally oxygenated microenvironments as early as 3.46 Ga (Hoashi et al., Reference Hoashi, Bevacqua, Otake, Watanabe, Hickman, Utsunomiya and Ohmoto2009). Photosynthetic production of oxygen long predated the final catastrophic shift in paradigm, which may have been suppressed while excess reducing species were able to scavenge free oxygen effectively (Catling and Claire, Reference Catling and Claire2005). This is the complementary situation to the present day, where despite the prevalent high oxygen fugacity at the Earth's surface, highly reducing environments still occur but are limited in spatiotemporal extent (Konn et al., Reference Konn, Charlou, Holm and Mousis2015).

Fig. 2. ‘Age’ of secondary mineral samples from a variety of worldwide deposits.

Secondary minerals may persist for long periods if sufficiently abundant or insoluble. Hematite-stained calcrete horizons define exhumed and cross-sectioned palaeolandscapes of early Palaeozoic age (>350 Ma) on the island of Arran, Scotland (Friend et al., Reference Friend, Harland and Gilbert Smith1970; Young and Caldwell, Reference Young and Caldwell2009). Palaeomagnetic data indicate a similar age for some Australian regolith environments (Pillans et al., Reference Pillans, Tonui, Idnurm, Taylor and Pain2004), while other data shows that pisolitic and fragmental duricrust have (U–Th)/He ages of 5.8–1.3 Ma (Wells et al., Reference Wells, Danišík, McInnes and Morris2018). Highly insoluble Mn4+ oxide minerals have yielded ages as old as 65 Ma (Vasconcelos et al., Reference Vasconcelos, Heim, Farley, Monteiro and Waltenberg2013). However, most secondary minerals are scarce in quantity and distribution as well as softer than such resistant oxides, and will have crystallised, only to be eradicated later without trace through chemical attack or mechanical erosion.

Such disappearance would be the fate of the very different suite of secondary minerals that would have formed in the anoxic conditions of the early Archaean. These may well have included highly reduced species, which are likely to have been far more common in surficial environments in the Archaean than their rare and ephemeral modern counterparts.

While occurrences of species can certainly be destroyed, it is in fact very difficult to find examples which can be excluded from recurrence elsewhere or in the future. Even when a particular environment is unlikely to recur on Earth, the spatial domain of mineralogy includes other planetary bodies in this Solar System and beyond, in a way that terrestrial biology cannot. High-temperature, Mg-rich komatiitic lavas, and hence any minerals specific to that environment, are almost confined to the Archaean as a result of secular decrease in geothermal gradients. However, a unique much younger (Paleogene) example of a terrestrial komatiite is known (Gansser et al., Reference Gansser, Dietrich and Cameron1979) and they erupt still on Io, one of the moons of Jupiter (cf. Williams et al., Reference Williams, Wilson and Greeley2000). An even more unusual ancient rock type, the unique Bon Accord nickel oxide–silicate body, is of Archaean age and uncertain paragenesis (Tredoux et al., Reference Tredoux, Roelofse and Shukolyukov2013; O'Driscoll et al., Reference O'Driscoll, Clay, Cawthorn, Lenaz, Adetunji and Kronz2014). However, the only two mineral species that are currently found only in this deposit are the relatively oxidised borate bonaccordite, Ni2Fe3+[BO3]O2 (De Waal et al., Reference De Waal, Viljoen and Calk1974) and the antimonate tredouxite, NiSb5+2O6 (Bindi et al., Reference Bindi, Zaccarini, Miller and Garuti2018), which could have been formed by boron metasomatism and oxidation of a Ni–Sb sulfide body of any age. Rarity of the physicochemical circumstances required to form a species, and occurrence at only one ancient locality, is likely to provide at most a very temporary form of ‘extinct’ status.

Given that the species that actually occur are only a subset of those that could do so plausibly (Hazen et al., Reference Hazen, Grew, Downs, Golden and Hystad2015), there may be many mineral species once present on Earth that are now ‘extinct’. Our knowledge of the Earth's former mineralogical inventory is necessarily incomplete, and the apparent secular increase in diversity and complexity may be exaggerated by the loss of species that have long since disappeared. However, while ‘virtually all plant and animal species that have ever lived on the earth are extinct’ (Raup, Reference Raup1986), long-absent mineral species may ‘return’ in the future if favourable conditions recur. This difference in the nature of ‘extinction’ spotlights the fundamental flaw in the ‘evolution’ analogy. Phylogenesis of organisms produces unique occurrences of species that are contingent upon the nature of their equally unique predecessors, while paragenesis of minerals lacks this unidirectional, irreversible flow.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2019.60

Acknowledgements

The Ian Potter Foundation grant ‘tracking tellurium’ to SJM has funded part of this study. Pierre Clolus is thanked for taking the photomicrographs. Roland Maas (University of Melbourne) is thanked for the sample screening to check U–Th–Pb concentrations and Petra Bajo (University of Melbourne) for running the samples. Frank Hawthorne, Ed Grew, Igor Pekov and Sergey Krivovichev are thanked for their helpful comments.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Daniel Atencio

References

American Museum of Natural History [AMNH] (2017) American Museum of Natural History to design all-new halls of gems and minerals. Press Release no. 75, October 2017, 6 pp., American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Bindi, L., Zaccarini, F., Miller, D.E. and Garuti, G. (2018) Tredouxite, NiSb2O6: another new Ni-bearing mineral from the Bon Accord oxide body, South Africa. European Journal of Mineralogy, 30, 393398.Google Scholar
Birch, W.D., Mills, S.J., Maas, R. and Hellstrom, J.C. (2011) A chronology for Late Quaternary weathering in the Murray Basin, southeastern Australia: evidence from 230Th/U dating of secondary uranium phosphates in the Lake Boga and Wycheproof granites, Victoria. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 58, 835845.Google Scholar
Bonhomme, M.G., Gauthier-Lafaye, F. and Weber, F. (1982) An example of Lower Proterozoic sediments: the Francevillian in Gabon. Precambrian Research, 18, 87102.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C., Ewing, R.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1997) The crystal chemistry of hexavalent uranium: polyhedron geometries, bond-valence parameters, and polymerization of polyhedra. The Canadian Mineralogist, 35, 15511570.Google Scholar
Catling, D.C. and Claire, M.W. (2005) How Earth's atmosphere evolved to an oxic state: A status report. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 237, 120.Google Scholar
Decrée, S., Deloule, É., De Putter, T., Dewaele, S., Mees, F., Yans, J. and Marignac, C. (2011) SIMS U–Pb dating of uranium mineralization in the Katanga Copperbelt: Constraints for the geodynamic context. Ore Geology Reviews, 40, 8189.Google Scholar
De Waal, S.A., Viljoen, E.A. and Calk, L.C. (1974) Nickel minerals from Barberton, South Africa: VII. Bonaccordite. The nickel analogue of ludwigite. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa, 77, 375.Google Scholar
Dewaele, S., Muchez, P., Vets, J., Fernandez-Alonzo, M. and Tack, L. (2006) Multiphase origin of the Cu–Co ore deposits in the western part of the Lufilian fold-and-thrust belt, Katanga (Democratic Republic of Congo). Journal of African Earth Sciences, 46, 455469.Google Scholar
Dill, H.G., Gerdes, A. and Weber, B. (2010) Age and mineralogy of supergene uranium minerals—tools to unravel geomorphological and palaeohydrological processes in granitic terrains (Bohemian Massif, SE Germany). Geomorphology, 117, 4465.Google Scholar
Dill, H.G., Gerdes, A. and Weber, B. (2011) Dating of Pleistocene uranyl phosphates in the supergene alteration zone of Late Variscan granites by Laser-Ablation-Inductive-Coupled-Plasma Mass Spectrometry with a review of U minerals of geochronological relevance to Quaternary geology. Chemie der Erde-Geochemistry, 71, 201206.Google Scholar
Drysdale, R.N., Paul, B.T., Hellstrom, J., Couchoud, I., Greig, A., Bajo, P., Zanchetta, G., Isola, I., Spötl, C., Baneschi, I., Regattieri, E. and Woodhead, J.D. (2012) Precise microsampling of poorly laminated speleothems for U-series dating. Quaternary Geochronology, 14, 3847.Google Scholar
Friend, P.F., Harland, W.B. and Gilbert Smith, A. (1970) Reddening and fissuring associated with the Caledonian unconformity in North-West Arran. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 81, 7585.Google Scholar
Gansser, A., Dietrich, V.J. and Cameron, W.E. (1979) Paleogene komatiites from Gorgona Island. Nature, 278, 545546.Google Scholar
Grew, E.S. (2017) Boron: From cosmic scarcity to 300 minerals. Elements, 13, 225229.Google Scholar
Grew, E.S., Krivovichev, S.V., Hazen, R.M. and Hystad, G. (2016) Evolution of structural complexity in boron minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 54, 125143.Google Scholar
Grew, E.S., Hystad, G., Toapanta, M.P., Eleish, A., Ostroverkhova, A., Golden, J. and Hazen, R.M. (2019) Lithium mineral evolution and ecology: comparison with boron and beryllium. European Journal of Mineralogy, https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/2019/0031-2862Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M. and Eldredge, N. (2010) Themes and variations in complex systems. Elements, 6, 4346.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Papineau, D., Bleeker, W., Downs, R.T., Ferry, J.M., McCoy, T.J., Sverjensky, D.A., and Yang, H. (2008) Mineral evolution. American Mineralogist, 93, 16931720.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Ewing, R.C. and Sverjensky, D.A. (2009) Evolution of uranium and thorium minerals. American Mineralogist, 94, 12931311.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Golden, J., Downs, R.T., Hystad, G., Grew, E.S., Azzolini, D., Sverjensky, D.A. (2012) Mercury (Hg) mineral evolution: A mineralogical record of supercontinent assembly, changing ocean geochemistry, and the emerging terrestrial biosphere. American Mineralogist, 97, 10131042.Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Liu, X.-M., Downs, R.T., Golden, J., Pires, A.J., Grew, E.S., Hystad, G., Estrada, C. and Sverjensky, D.A. (2014) Mineral evolution: episodic metallogenesis, the supercontinent cycle, and the coevolving geosphere and biosphere. Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication, 18, 115Google Scholar
Hazen, R.M., Grew, E.S., Downs, R.T., Golden, J. and Hystad, G. (2015) Mineral ecology: chance and necessity in the mineral diversity of terrestrial planets. The Canadian Mineralogist, 53, 295324.Google Scholar
Hellstrom, J. (2003) Rapid and accurate U/Th dating using parallel ion-counting multi-collector ICP-MS, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 18, 13461351.Google Scholar
Hills, J.H. and Richards, J.R. (1976) Pitchblende and galena ages in the Alligator Rivers region, Northern Territory, Australia. Mineralium Deposita, 11, 133154.Google Scholar
Hoashi, M., Bevacqua, D.C., Otake, T., Watanabe, Y., Hickman, A.H., Utsunomiya, S. and Ohmoto, S. (2009) Primary haematite formation in an oxygenated sea 3.46 billion years ago. Nature Geoscience, 2, 301306.Google Scholar
Koeberl, C., Brandstätter, F., Harzhauser, M. and Riedl-Dorn, C. (2018) History and importance of the geoscience collections at the Natural History Museum Vienna. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 535, 131161.Google Scholar
Koehler, M.C., Buick, R., Kipp, M.A., Stüeken, E.E. and Zaloumis, J. (2018) Transient surface ocean oxygenation recorded in the ~2.66-Ga Jeerinah Formation, Australia. PNAS, 115, 77117716.Google Scholar
Konn, C., Charlou, J.-C., Holm, N.G. and Mousis, O. (2015) The production of methane, hydrogen, and organic compounds in ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal vents of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Astrobiology, 15, 381399.Google Scholar
Krivovichev, S.V., Krivovichev, V.G. and Hazen, R.M. (2017) Structural and chemical complexity of minerals: correlations and time evolution. European Journal of Mineralogy, 30, 16.Google Scholar
Lussier, A.J., Lopez, R.A. and Burns, P.C. (2016) A revised and expanded structure hierarchy of natural and synthetic hexavalent uranium compounds. The Canadian Mineralogist, 54, 177283.Google Scholar
McCulloch, M.T. and Esat, T. (2000) The coral record of last interglacial sea levels and sea surface temperatures. Chemical Geology, 169, 107129.Google Scholar
McDowell, F.W., Roldán-Quintana, J. and Connelly, J.N. (2001) Duration of Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary magmatism in east-central Sonora, Mexico. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113, 521531.Google Scholar
Mills, S.J., Birch, W.D., Maas, R., Phillips, D. and Plimer, I.R. (2008) Lake Boga Granite, northwestern Victoria: mineralogy, geochemistry and geochronology. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 55, 281299.Google Scholar
Newman, M.E.J. (1997) A model for mass extinction. Journal of theoretical Biology, 189, 235252.Google Scholar
O'Driscoll, B., Clay, P.L., Cawthorn, R.G., Lenaz, D., Adetunji, J. and Kronz, A. (2014) Trevorite: Ni-rich spinel formed by metasomatism and desulfurization processes at Bon Accord, South Africa? Mineralogical Magazine, 78, 145163.Google Scholar
Porada, H. and Berhorst, V. (2000) Towards a new understanding of the Neoproterozoic–Early Palaeozoic Lufilian and northern Zambezi Belts in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 30, 727771.Google Scholar
Pillans, B., Tonui, E. and Idnurm, M. (2004) Paleomagnetic dating of weathered regolith at Northparkes mine, NSW. Pp. 237242 in: New Approaches to an Old Continent (Taylor, G. and Pain, C., editors). Cooperative Research Centre for Landscape Evolution and Mineral Exploration, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
Raup, D.M. (1986) Biological extinction in Earth history. Science, 231, 15281533.Google Scholar
Stewart, J.A. (2014) The direction of evolution: the rise of cooperative organization. Biosystems, 123, 2736.Google Scholar
Tredoux, M., Roelofse, F. and Shukolyukov, A. (2013) A Cr isotopic study of the Bon Accord NiO body in the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa. Chemical Geology, 390, 182190Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, C. and McKenzie, J.A. (2009) The Descent of Minerals. Science, 323, 218219.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, P.M., Heim, J.A., Farley, J.A., Monteiro, H. and Waltenberg, K. (2013) Ar-40/Ar-39 and (U–Th)/He–He-4/He-3 geochronology of landscape evolution and channel iron deposit genesis at Lynn Peak, Western Australia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 117, 283312.Google Scholar
Wells, M., Danišík, M., McInnes, B. and Morris, P. (2018) Miocene-Pliocene (U–Th)/He ages for lateritic duricrust, in the southwest Darling Range, WA. XXII General Meeting of the International Mineralogical Association Melbourne, Australia, August 2018, p. 188.Google Scholar
Williams, D.A., Wilson, A.H. and Greeley, R. (2000) A komatiite analog to potential ultramafic materials on Io. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 16711684.Google Scholar
Young, G.M. and Caldwell, W.G.E. (2009) A new look at an old unconformity: field and geochemical data from James Hutton's original unconformity on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 120, 6575.Google Scholar
Zhabin, A.G. (1979) Is there evolution of mineral speciation on Earth? Doklady Akademii Nauk, 247, 199202 [in Russian; translation: Doklady Earth Science Sections, 247, 142–144].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Torbernite on kasolite from Shinkolobwe, DRC; (b) chervetite on francevillite from Mounana mine, Gabon. Field of view ~2.5 mm across. Collection Valérie Galea-Clolus.

Figure 1

Table 1. U–Th dating samples from a variety of worldwide deposits.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. ‘Age’ of secondary mineral samples from a variety of worldwide deposits.

Supplementary material: File

Mills and Christy supplementary material

Mills and Christy supplementary material

Download Mills and Christy supplementary material(File)
File 36.4 KB