Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T13:08:18.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of the Quality of Manual Chest Compressions and Rescuer Fatigue in Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Positions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2025

Beibei Li
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Pan Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Shuang Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Qian Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Yannan Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Siyi Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Li Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
Peng Sun*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Ministry of Education, Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China
*
Peng Sun Department of Emergency Medicine Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, China Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Huazhong University of Science and Technology Ministry of Education Wuhan, Hubei Province 430022, China E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

Following the 2020 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines, this study compared participant’s fatigue with the quality of manual chest compressions performed in the head-up CPR (HUP-CPR) and supine CPR (SUP-CPR) positions for two minutes on a manikin.

Methods:

Both HUP-CPR and SUP-CPR were performed in a randomized order determined by a lottery-style draw. Manual chest compressions were then performed continuously on a realistic manikin for two minutes in each position, with a 30-minute break between each condition. Data were collected on heart rate, blood pressure, and Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale scores from the participants before and after the compressions.

Results:

Mean chest compression depth (MCCD), mean chest compression rate (MCCR), accurate chest compression depth ratio (ACCDR), and correct hand position ratio were significantly lower in the HUP group than that in the SUP group. However, there were no significant differences in accurate chest compression rate ratio (ACCRR), correct recoil ratio, or mean arterial pressure (MAP) before and after chest compressions between the two groups. Changes in heart rate and RPE scores were greater in the HUP group.

Conclusion:

High-quality manual chest compressions can still be performed when the CPR manikin is placed in the HUP position. However, the quality of chest compressions in the HUP position was poorer than those in the SUP position, and rescuer fatigue was increased.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Note: Authors Li and Zhang contributed equally.

References

Panchal, AR, Bartos, JA, Cabanas, JG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366S468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virani, SS, Alonso, A, Benjamin, EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139e596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delguercio, LR, Feins, NR, Cohn, JD, Coomaraswamy, RP, Wollman, SB, State, D. Comparison of blood flow during external and internal cardiac massage in man. Circulation. 1965;31(SUPPL 1):171180.Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, CC, Chen, KC, Lin, ZY, et al. The effect of the head-up position on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, N, Wetterslev, J, Cronberg, T, et al. Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C versus 36 degrees C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(23):21972206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buick, JE, Drennan, IR, Scales, DC, et al. Improving temporal trends in survival and neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(1):e003561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debaty, G, Shin, SD, Metzger, A, et al. Tilting for perfusion: head-up position during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves brain flow in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015;87:3843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, HH, Moore, JC, Yannopoulos, D, et al. The effect of head up cardiopulmonary resuscitation on cerebral and systemic hemodynamics. Resuscitation. 2016;102:2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, JC, Segal, N, Lick, MC, et al. Head and thorax elevation during active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an impedance threshold device improves cerebral perfusion in a swine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;121:195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JC, Salverda, B, Lick, M, et al. Controlled progressive elevation rather than an optimal angle maximizes cerebral perfusion pressure during head up CPR in a swine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2020;150:2328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojas-Salvador, C, Moore, JC, Salverda, B, Lick, M, Debaty, G, Lurie, KG. Effect of controlled sequential elevation timing of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2020;149:162169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JC, Salverda, B, Rojas-Salvador, C, Lick, M, Debaty, G, Lurie, KG. Controlled sequential elevation of the head and thorax combined with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an impedance threshold device improves neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2021;158:220227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JC, Pepe, PE, Scheppke, KA, et al. Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival. Resuscitation. 2022;179:917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, KM, Bray, JE, Ng, K-C, et al. 2023 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation. 2023;148(24):e187e280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiering, BA, Mujika, I, Sharp, MA, Foulis, SA. Maintaining physical performance: the minimal dose of exercise needed to preserve endurance and strength over time. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35(5):14491458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borg, E, Kaijser, L. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):5769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, T, Shin, SD, Song, KJ, et al. The effect of resuscitation position on cerebral and coronary perfusion pressure during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in porcine cardiac arrest model. Resuscitation. 2017;113:101107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashton, A, McCluskey, A, Gwinnutt, CL, Keenan, AM. Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compressions over 3 min. Resuscitation. 2002;55(2):151155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zou, Y, Shi, W, Zhu, Y, et al. Rate at 120/min provides qualified chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(4):535538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochoa, FJ, Ramalle-Gomara, E, Lisa, V, Saralegui, I. The effect of rescuer fatigue on the quality of chest compressions. Resuscitation. 1998;37(3):149152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abella, BS, Edelson, DP, Kim, S, et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation. 2007;73(1):5461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinkrolf, P, Lukas, R, Harding, U, et al. A better understanding of ambulance personnel’s attitude towards real-time resuscitation feedback. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(2):110117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer-Johansen, J, Myklebust, H, Wik, L, et al. Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study. Resuscitation. 2006;71(3):283292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasegawa, T, Okane, R, Ichikawa, Y, Inukai, S, Saito, S. Effect of chest compression with kneeling on the bed in clinical situations. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;17(2):e12314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, J, Hwang, SY, Lee, HJ, et al. Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014;22:59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bae, GE, Choi, A, Beom, JH, et al. Correlation between real-time heart rate and fatigue in chest compression providers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulation-based interventional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(16):e25425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, CS, Hsu, YJ, Li, F, et al. Effect of ambulance stretcher bed height adjustment on CPR quality and rescuer fatigue in a laboratory environment. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(13):27832788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinchi, M, Kobayashi, M, Soma, K, Maeda, A. Comparison of chest compression quality in walking versus straddling cardiopulmonary resuscitation during stretcher transportation: a prospective randomized crossover study using manikins. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material 1

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material 2

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 94.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material 3

Li et al. supplementary material
Download Li et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 90.5 KB