Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:33:07.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the neotocite group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. M. Clark ,
A. J. Easton  and
M. Mount
A. M. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
A. J. Easton
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD
M. Mount
Affiliation:
Geevor Tin Mines Ltd., Cornwall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopses

An examination has been carried out of ten specimens assigned to the group. These include metatype specimens of neotocite (Gestrikland, Sweden) and penwithite (Wheal Owles, Penwith, Cornwall) and topo-type specimens of stratopeïte (Pajsberg, Sweden), klipsteinite (Herborn, Dillenberg, Germany), and opsimose (specimen labelled klipsteinite, but from Klapperud, Dalecarlia, Sweden). The investigation arose out of the recent find of neotocite at the Geevor mine, Cornwall, close to the site of the type locality for penwithite.

In the investigation klipsteinite has been confirmed as a mixture (Fisher, 188o), the dominant mineral in the mixture giving an X-ray pattern close to birnessite. Chemical analyses, refractive indices, and specific gravity determinations are given for the remainder in the miniprint section, p. M27 (Table I). They show that the group can be represented fairly closely by the formula (Mn, Fe)SiO3.H2O, but with significant carbonate present in each sample. CO2 has not generally been reported before in these minerals and the water content is lower than previous analyses, as a result of the precautions taken in drying the material before analysis (over magnesium perchlorate at room temperature).

The specimens examined are all dark brown or black in appearance (often darkening on exposure to light) with a vitreous lustre and conchoidal fracture. The group should be regarded as poorly crystalline since all the specimens gave similar X-ray powder patterns with three very broad and diffuse lines around 3·5, 2·6, and 1·6 Å respectively (see Whelan and Goldich, 1961). After heating to 1000 °C all form braunite, with the exception of stratopeite, which gave an X-ray powder pattern closer to pyroxmangite. Hausmannite or spinel were also found associated with braunite in several specimens.

The full text includes the results of differential thermal analysis and infra-red spectra from the samples.

Of the names used in the group, opsimose (Beudant, 1832) was the first recorded, but in this and the subsequent work of Bahr (1850), it was associated with material much richer in manganese. Wittingite and neotocite (Nordenskiöld, 1849) were -named separately on account of the higher iron content of neotocite. Stratopeïte (Igelström, 1851) is a magnesium-bearing variety, while penwithite (Collins, 1878, 1879) was thought to have a different manganese valency state from wittingite.

In view of its current widespread usage and the fact that neotocite was originally named for an iron-bearing manganese silicate it is proposed that neotocite be defined as the group of poorly crystalline manganese silicates with formulae close to (Mn, Fe)SiO3.H2O and Mn > Fe. With Fe > Mn the series grades into hisingerite. Limited substitution of MgO, Al2O3, and CO2 should be acceptable. Finally it has been proposed that the other names be discarded. The Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names, IMA, has approved these proposals, but came to no firm conclusion as to whether the group name should be spelt ‘neotocite’ or as in the original description ‘neotokite’. Accordingly either are permissible.

Type
Synopses
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 42 , Issue 322 , June 1978 , pp. 279 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bahr, (J. F.), 1850. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh. Stockh. 7, 240-7.Google Scholar
Beudant, (F. S.), 1832. Traité Elementaire de Min., Paris. 2nd edn., p. 187.Google Scholar
Collins, (J. H.), 1878. Mineral. Mag. 2, 91.Google Scholar
Collins, (J. H.), 1879. Ibid. 3, 89-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, (H.), 1880. Z. Kristallogr. 4, 365-6.Google Scholar
Igelström, (L. J.), 1851. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh. Stockh. 8, 143-7.Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, (N.), 1849. Nord. Atom. Ch. Min. Syst., pp. 110–140.Google Scholar
Whelan, (J. A.) and Goldich, (S. S.), 1961. Am. Mineral. 46, 1412-23.Google Scholar

References

Bahr, (J. F.), 1850. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh. Stockh. 7, 240-7.Google Scholar
Beudant, (F. S.), 1832. Traité Elementaire de Min., Paris. 2nd edn., p. 187.Google Scholar
Cleve, (P. T.) and Nordenskiöld, (A. E.), 1866. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh. Stockh., 23, 169–183.Google Scholar
Collins, (J. H.), 1878. Mineral. Mag. 2, 91.Google Scholar
Collins, (J. H.), 1879. Ibid. 3, 89-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, (J. D.), 1868. System of Mineralogy, 5th ed., p. 511.Google Scholar
Easton, (A. J.), 1972. Chemical Analysis of Silicate Rocks. Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
Fisher, (H.), 1880. Z. Kristallogr. 4, 365-6.Google Scholar
Ham, (W. E.) and Oakes, (M. C.), 1944. Econ. Geol. 39, 412–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igelström, (L. J.), 1851. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh, Stockh; 8, 143-7,Google Scholar
Ito, (K.), 1961. J. Jap. Assoc. Min. Petr. & Econ. Geol. 46, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, (T.), 1924. J. Geol. Soc. Tokyo, 31, 19–22.Google Scholar
Klaproth, (M. H.), 1807. Beitr. Z. Chem. Kenn. d. Mineral., 4, 137.Google Scholar
Lee, (D. E.), 1955. Stanford Univ. Pub., Geol. Sci., 5, 18–19.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, (B.) and Jansson, (S.), 1962. Am. Mineral., 47, 1356-62.Google Scholar
Moberg, (A.), 1856. Acta Soc. Sci, Fenn., 4, 602-6.Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, (A. E.), 1863. Besk, o. de i Finland funna Mineralier, Helsingfors. p. 136,Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, (A. E.), 1867. J. pr. Chem., 100, 122.Google Scholar
Nordenskiöld, (A. E.), 1849, Nord. Atom. Ch. Min. Syst,, p. 110, 140.Google Scholar
Pardee, (J. F.), Larsen, (E. d., Jr.), and Steiger, (G.), 1921, J. Washington Acad. Sci., 11, 25–32.Google Scholar
Riley, (J. P.) and Williams, (H. P.), 1959. Mikrochim. Acta, 4, 516-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, (S.), 1976. Handbook of Strata-Round and Stratiform Ore Deposits, Vol. 7. Wolf, K. H., ed., Elsevier, pp 395–476.Google Scholar
Soklakov, (A. I.) and Dorfman, (M. D.), 1964. Mineraly SSSR, 15, 167–175. [M.A. 18-160]Google Scholar
Svanberg, (L.) and Igelström, (L. J.), 1849. Ofvers. K. Vetensk-Akad. Förh. Stockh., 6, 166-8.Google Scholar
von Kobell, (F.), 1866, J. pr, Chem., 97, 180-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, (J. A.) and Goldich, (S. S.), 1961. Am. Mineral. 46, 1412-23.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Errata and Addenda