Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:31:28.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing Reviewers: Predictors of Undergraduate Manuscript Evaluations – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2022

Christina P. Walker ,
Terri L. Towner  and
Lea Hilliker
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 456
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Walker et al. Reference Walker, Towner and Hilliker2022 contains an error in the Results section. In the third paragraph under “Results,” the third sentence should read as follows: “Regarding race, the results show that white reviewers gave significantly higher originality ratings than nonwhite reviewers, with a reviewer’s race being the most robust indicator.”

The authors apologize for this error.

References

REFERENCE

Walker, Christina P., Towner, Terri L., and Hilliker, Lea. “Choosing Reviewers: Predictors of Undergraduate Manuscript Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics. Published online 8 February 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001888.Google Scholar