Choosing Reviewers: Predictors of Undergraduate Manuscript Evaluations – CORRIGENDUM

Christina P. Walker; Terri L. Towner; Lea Hilliker

doi:10.1017/S1049096522000579

Choosing Reviewers: Predictors of Undergraduate Manuscript Evaluations – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2022

Christina P. Walker ,

Terri L. Towner and

Lea Hilliker

Article contents

Abstract
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Type: Corrigendum
Information: PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 456

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000579 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Walker et al. Reference Walker, Towner and Hilliker2022 contains an error in the Results section. In the third paragraph under “Results,” the third sentence should read as follows: “Regarding race, the results show that white reviewers gave significantly higher originality ratings than nonwhite reviewers, with a reviewer’s race being the most robust indicator.”

The authors apologize for this error.

References

REFERENCE

Walker, Christina P., Towner, Terri L., and Hilliker, Lea. “Choosing Reviewers: Predictors of Undergraduate Manuscript Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics. Published online 8 February 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521001888.Google Scholar