Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:24:54.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shored Against Our Ruins*

Review products

THE FRAGMENTS OF THE ROMAN HISTORIANS. VOLUME 1: INTRODUCTION; VOLUME 2: TEXTS AND TRANSLATIONS; VOLUME 3: COMMENTARY. General Editor: T. J.Cornell. Editorial Committee: E. H.Bispham, T. J.Cornell, J. W.Rich, C. J.Smith. Contributors: E. H.Bispham, J.Briscoe, T. J.Cornell, A.Drummond†, B. M.Levick, S. J.Northwood, S. P.Oakley, M. P.Pobjoy, J. W.Rich, C. J.Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. l + 662, viii + 1159, viii + 829, illus. ISBN 9780199277056 (set). £300.00/US$375.00 (set).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

John Marincola
John Marincola*
Affiliation:
The Florida State University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

These are exciting times for the study of Roman literature. New editions of the fragmentary poets and prose writers either have appeared or are in preparation, while renewed interest in the nature and character of the early Roman audience, and in the development of Roman literature itself, has sought to explain the larger context in which these writings arose and were read. Monographs and commentaries on early writers and genres have appeared in profusion, with four volumes on Ennius' Annals alone published within two years, at least one of which has raised serious questions of what we can and cannot know of the structure, orientation and contents of a poem that was (uniquely) influential on both later poetry and history.

Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 106 , November 2016 , pp. 237 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Jessica Clark, Christina Kraus, Catherine Steel and A. J. Woodman for reading earlier versions of this review and offering helpful corrections and criticisms. They must not be assumed to agree with the opinions expressed here.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Badian, E. 1966: ‘The early historians’, in Dorey, T. A. (ed.), Latin Historians, London, 1–38 Google Scholar
Beck, H., and Walter, U. 2001–2004: Die frühen römischen Historiker, 2 vols (vol. 1, 2nd edn, 2005), Darmstadt Google Scholar
Briscoe, J. 2005: ‘The language and style of the fragmentary republican historians’, in Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. and Adams, J. N. (eds), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, Oxford, 53–72 Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1980: ‘On historical fragments and epitomes’, Classical Quarterly 30, 477–94Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 1986: Caton: les Origines (fragments), Paris Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 1996: L'Annalistique romaine I: les annales des pontifes et l'annalistique ancienne, Paris Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 1999: L'Annalistique romaine II: l'annalistique moyenne, Paris Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 2004: L'Annalistique romaine III: l'annalistique récente, l'autobiographie politique, Paris Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. 2015: ‘Une nouvelle édition des fragments des historiens romains’, Histos 9, XXVII–XLIII Google Scholar
Davies, J. 2016: ‘The historical commentary’, in Kraus, C. S. and Stray, C. (eds), Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre, Oxford, 233–49Google Scholar
Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N., and Walter, U. (eds) 2003: Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius, Darmstadt Google Scholar
Elliott, J. 2013: Ennius and the Architecture of the Annals , Cambridge Google Scholar
Fabrizi, V. 2012: Mores veteresque novosque: rappresentazioni del passato e del presente di Roma negli Annales di Ennio, Pisa Google Scholar
Feeney, D. 2016: Beyond Greek: the Beginnings of Latin Literature, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (ed.) 2009: Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians, Cambridge Google Scholar
Fisher, J. 2014: The ‘Annals’ of Quintus Ennius and the Italic Tradition, Baltimore Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K., and Kraus, C. S. (eds) 2002: The Classical Commentary: History, Practices, Theory, Mnemosyne Supp. 232, Leiden Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005: Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception, Cambridge Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2013: Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil's Aeneid , Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1909: ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Historiographie und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, Klio 9, 80–123; reprinted in F. Jacoby, Abhandlungen zur griechischen Geschichtsschreibung (ed. H. Bloch), Leiden, 1956, 16–64; English trans. by Chambers, M. and Schorn, S., Histos Supp. 3, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2015Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1949: Atthis: the Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens, Oxford Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S., and Woodman, A. J. 1997: Latin Historians, G&R New Surveys in the Classics 27, Oxford Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G., and Longrée, D. (eds) 2003: Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l'histoire: représentations, récits et idéologie, 2 vols, Rennes Google Scholar
Luraghi, N. 2007: ‘Two (more) books about Momigliano’, Storia della Storiografia 52, 113–23Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2012: Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta, vol. 2: Ennius, Göttingen Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (ed.) 2007: A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, 2 vols, Malden, MA and Oxford Google Scholar
Miller, P. N. (ed.) 2007: Momigliano and Antiquarianism: Foundations of the Modern Cultural Sciences, Toronto Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1950: ‘Ancient history and the antiquarian’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 13, 285–315, reprinted in A. Momigliano, Contributo alla storia degli studi classici, Rome, 1955, 67–106Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (ed.) 1997: Collecting Fragments/Fragmente sammeln, Göttingen Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. 1997–2005: A Commentary on Livy, Books VI–X, 4 vols, Oxford Google Scholar
Peter, H. W. G. 1870–1906: Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae, 2 vols, Leipzig (2nd edn, 1914–1916)Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2014: ‘Talking to slaves in the Plautine audience’, Classical Antiquity 33, 174–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, M. 2012: Tragicorum Romanorum Fragmenta, vol. 1: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, tragici minores, fragmenta adespota, Göttingen CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepens, G. 1997: ‘Jacoby's FGrHist: problems, methods, prospects’, in Most 1997, 144–72Google Scholar
Scholz, P., and Walter, U. 2013: Fragmente römischen Memoiren, Heidelberg Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1939: The Roman Revolution, Oxford Google Scholar
Walter, U. 2004: Memoria und Res Publica: zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom, Frankfurt Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1979: Clio's Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature, Leicester and Totowa, NJ Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2009: Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late Republican Politics and Literature, Oxford Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2015: The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History, Oxford Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1988: Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies, London Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2015: Lost Histories: Selected Fragments of Roman Historical Writers, Histos Supp. 2, Newcastle upon Tyne Google Scholar