There was an unfortunate error made in this paper (Pons et al., Reference Pons, Andreu, Sanztorrent, Buillegaz and Lewkowicz2012) in the sentence commencing on line 13 of the abstract, page 688 of this issue, which read:
‘Children with SLI only detected the 666 ms asynchrony when the auditory component followed the visual component.’
The correct sentence should read as follows:
‘Children with SLI only detected the 666 ms asynchrony when the auditory component preceded the visual component.’