Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance of any degree appearing for the first time during pregnancy( 1 ). It is the most common complication during pregnancy, affecting approximately 2–12 % of pregnant women( Reference Dabelea, Snell-Bergeon and Hartsfield 2 – Reference Kwik, Seeho and Smith 4 ). One in ten pregnancies worldwide is associated with diabetes, of which 90 % are diagnosed as GDM. Approximately 30 % of pregnancies in high-risk individuals, including advanced maternal age, overweight or obese mothers, and those with a positive family history of diabetes, may develop diabetes( 5 – Reference Veeraswamy, Vijayam and Gupta 7 ). Women with GDM have an increased risk of subsequent development of type 2 diabetes and other maternal complications( Reference Metzger, Lowe and Dyer 8 – Reference Tallarigo, Giampietro and Penno 10 ). Similarly, offspring of mothers with GDM are at greater risk of fetal/neonatal morbidity and consecutive obesity and glucose intolerance( Reference Scholl, Sowers and Chen 11 , Reference Vohr, McGarvey and Tucker 12 ). Overall, the prevalence of GDM has been rising everywhere, with a dramatic increase seen in mainland China in the past 30 years( Reference Ma and Chan 13 – Reference Zhang, Dong and Zhang 15 ).
The duration of pregnancy is accompanied with complex physiological, social and emotional changes. About 80 % of pregnant women suffer from some degree of morning sickness, nausea and vomiting in the first trimester, thereby resulting in reduced maternal food intake( Reference Koren, Maltepe and Gow 16 , Reference Quinla and Hill 17 ). Chinese pregnant women commonly consider that this phenomenon may result in fetal developmental retardation, low birth weight and stillbirth( Reference Allen 18 , Reference Latva-Pukkila, Isolauri and Laitinen 19 ). Based on this cognition, they usually try their best to increase dietary intake as soon as their morning sickness gets resolved at the beginning of the second trimester. To our knowledge, such diet modification, the related cognitive views and their associations with increased risk of GDM in Chinese women have not been reported.
With the socio-economic improvement in China in the past decade, people have experienced rapid lifestyle changes leading to a sedentary lifestyle and a Western-like dietary pattern( Reference Metzger, Lowe and Dyer 8 ). Consequently, the number of women with increased body weight, obesity and diabetes (including GDM) has risen tremendously over the past 30 years( Reference Wang, Mi and Shan 20 , Reference Yang, Lu and Weng 21 ). It has been reported that some behavioural factors, such as dietary intake, low physical activity, weight gain and substance use, are associated with the risk of GDM among pregnant women( Reference Kaiser and Allen 22 – Reference Zhang, Solomon and Manson 24 ). However, most of the studies in this respect were carried out on Caucasian women( Reference Bertolotto, Volpe and Calianno 25 – Reference Radesky, Oken and Rifas-Shiman 28 ) and only a few studies were conducted on Asian populations, especially in relation to Chinese society. In addition, studies to understand the association of cognitive views on pregnancy health with the incidence of GDM are extremely lacking. The main contents of the current family planning policy in China are advocating delayed marriage (>23 years) and delayed childbearing (>24 years). Additionally, Chinese young women are expected by their parents and society to finish all their planned education (including PhD studies in some cases) before they get married; and young couples are expected to have their own apartments before planning to have a baby. Therefore, the average age for Chinese women to have babies is relatively advanced (e.g. 30·63 years in a recent report)( Reference Cheng, Pei and Han 29 ). It appears that Chinese pregnant women are probably more predisposed to GDM. Moreover, only a short time (usually less than 10 min) is allocated for prenatal care to pregnant women during their first trimester. This results in minimal physician–patient interaction and subsequent few case-specific health educations for Chinese pregnant women. In the current study we hypothesized that there is a significant diet modification among Chinese pregnant women during their second trimester as a compensatory phenomenon to combat the insufficient food intake caused by morning sickness during the first trimester. Moreover, the associations of dietary habits, physical activity and cognitive views on health during pregnancy in relation to the increased risk of GDM were assessed locally in the region of Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Methods
Study design and participants
The study was a cross-sectional one involving 571 pregnant women who underwent a 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Pregnant women were recruited from the out-patient service of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Department of Endocrinology at Nanfang Hospital. Women with the following conditions were included: aged between 18 and 40 years old, pregnancy at gestation between 24 weeks and 28 weeks, and fully interviewed. The following cases were excluded from the study: having been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and current treatment with medications supposed to adversely influence glucose tolerance (e.g. prednisone or other steroids). GDM was diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association's new recommendations for the 2-h, 75-g OGTT, according to which any one of the following conditions confers the diagnosis of GDM: fasting (0-h) blood glucose of ≥92 mg/dl (5·1 mmol/l), 1-h post-load plasma glucose of ≥180 mg/dl (10·0 mmol/l) or 2-h post-load plasma glucose of ≥153 mg/dl (8·5 mmol/l)( 30 ).
Clinical data such as pre-pregnancy body weight, weight gain to 24–28 weeks, previous history of GDM and pancreatic disease, and family history of diabetes were recorded for each pregnant woman. In all women, maternal weight and height were obtained by direct measurement on the examination day, while information on pre-pregnancy weight was self-reported by each woman. The gestational age was estimated from the last menstrual period, and was confirmed or corrected by ultrasonography.
All participants provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the Nanfang Hospital Ethics Committee.
Physical activity
The physical activity of all women was evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)( 31 ). This questionnaire included four domains of physical activity: (i) occupational (seven items); (ii) transportation (six items); (iii) household/gardening (six items); and (iv) leisure-time activities (six items). The questionnaire also included two questions about the time spent sitting as an indicator of sedentary behaviour. The number of days per week and the time spent walking per day as well as moderate and vigorous activities from all four domains were recorded. Computation of the total score (expressed as metabolic equivalents of task (MET) per week) requires recording of duration (in minutes) and frequency (days per week) of walking, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity activities. The following values were used for analysis of the IPAQ data: walking at work = 3·3 MET; cycling for transportation = 6·0 MET; moderate yard work = 4·0 MET; and vigorous intensity in leisure = 8·0 MET. Using these values, scores were calculated and ranked as follows:
The sum of all activities (walking at work, cycling for transportation, moderate yard work and vigorous intensity in leisure) represents the total weekly physical activity for each participant (MET-min/week scores)( 31 ). Based on these calculations, three categorical scores were arbitrarily defined: low (≤600 MET-min/week), middle (600–1500 MET-min/week) and high (≥1500 MET-min/week).
Dietary habits
Interviews were completed for all women using an FFQ to evaluate their dietary habits, in which the dietary status from the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy (12th gestational week) to the time of OGTT (24th to 28th gestational week) was investigated. The FFQ comprises eighty-one food items and the individual food items are aggregated into thirteen food groups that cover 90 % of foods commonly consumed in urban Guangzhou. In the fruit group, commonly consumed fruits were classified into three categories according to their glycaemic index (GI) value. High-GI fruits are defined as local tropical fruits such as litchi, longan, sugan cane, Hainan banana and durian, etc. Energy-dense snack foods (locally featured) in the dessert group included Cantonese Dim Sum such as lotus leaf glutinous rice, creamy egg yolk bun, egg custard tart and steamed lotus seed purée, baozi stuffed with red bean paste/creamy custard, etc. The FFQ has been previously tested for validity and reproducibility in similar populations signifying its appropriate use in this population( Reference Zhang and Ho 32 ). Each woman was asked to report her usual frequency of consumption as the number of times per day, per week, per month, per year, or never during the pregnancy and the average amount of food intake each time. Food intake data for each woman were then inputted into a computerized program (produced by Weizhida Electronic Technology Co., Xiangfan, Hubei Province, China) for calculating the amount of energy intake and dietary nutrient content (based on the tables of Chinese food composition( Reference Yang, Wang and Pan 33 )).
Cognitive view on pregnancy health
Using a structured questionnaire, face-to-face interviews were conducted by three trained interviewers to obtain information on maternal sociodemographic characteristics (age, residence, marital status, occupation and education). The questionnaire included questions about the pregnant woman's appetite in the first trimester, as well as her opinion about nausea and vomiting-related fetal health problems, dietary behaviour following the ending of morning sickness, and whether she received adequate prenatal care, both pregnancy- and diet-related health educations. Epdata3·02 (Military Medical Science Press, Beijing, China) was adopted to manage the data in the survey.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive characteristics of pregnant women were reported using means and standard deviations. One-way ANOVA was performed to assess the univariate differences among continuous variables. The χ 2 test was used to compare the observed frequencies between various groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations of dietary habits, physical activity and cognitive views on pregnancy health with GDM after adjusting for the factors that were significant in univariate analyses. Statistical comparisons were considered significant at P < 0·05. All analyses were performed using the statistical software package SPSS version 15·0.
Results
Basic clinical characteristics of observed participants
Of the 571 women, 539 (94 %) cases were fully interviewed and thus evaluated in the present study. The investigated women underwent an OGTT at 26·12 (sd 1·91) weeks’ gestation, 470 (87 %) of them were identified as GDM negative (GDM−) and sixty-nine (13 %) of them as GDM positive (GDM+). The basic clinical characteristics of the women and the diagnosis of GDM according to OGTT results are shown in Table 1. Compared with the GDM− women, GDM+ women were older, heavier (before pregnancy) and had greater weight gain during pregnancy (all P < 0·05).
GDM+/−, women with/without gestational diabetes mellitus according to results of an oral glucose tolerance test at the 24th to 28th gestational week.
The investigated women were on average 28·53 (sd 4·13) years of age, with pre-pregnancy BMI of 20·24 (sd 2·51) kg/m2 and weight gain of 9·92 (sd 3·14) kg at 26th gestational week.
Nutritional status of participants with and without gestational diabetes mellitus
The dietary intakes of macronutrients and other energy-carrying foods in women with and without GDM are shown in Table 2. No significant differences were observed between the GDM+ and GDM− groups in the intake of energy, macronutrients, fibre or cholesterol. The amounts of low- and middle-GI fruits consumed daily in the two groups were not statistically different; however, significantly higher intake of high-GI fruits was observed in GDM+ women than in GDM− women (P = 0·010). With regard to dietary energy-dense snack foods, women in the GDM+ group also demonstrated an increased daily intake compared with those in the GDM− group (P = 0·002).
GDM+/−, women with/without gestational diabetes mellitus according to results of an oral glucose tolerance test at the 24th to 28th gestational week; GI, glycaemic index.
The data in percentage indicate the proportional energy contribution of protein, fat or carbohydrate. The mean daily energy intake of the whole cohort was 10 092 (sd 2332) kJ/d (2412·12 (sd 557·34) kcal), with carbohydrate, fat and protein taking the proportion of 53·81%, 35·63% and 10·56%, respectively.
Plasma glucose levels in participants according to physical activity and BMI
The intensity of physical activity in GDM+ women was statistically lower than that in GDM− women (833·52 (sd 384·64) v. 966·31 (sd 455·92) MET-min/week, respectively; P = 0·020). We next investigated the levels of fasting (0 h), 1-h and 2-h post-load plasma glucose in normal-weight, overweight and obese women with low, middle or high physical activity. The comparisons between different physical activity intensities at each body weight level showed no statistical difference in the fasting, 1-h or 2-h post-load plasma glucose values (Table 3). However, in the women with low physical activity, the frequency of GDM diagnosed according to 1-h post-load plasma glucose in the overweight group was higher than in the normal-weight group (12·74 % v. 87·26 %, P = 0·034).
PG, plasma glucose.
Normal weight, pre-pregnancy BMI = 18·5–23·9 kg/m2; overweight, pre-pregnancy BMI = 24·0–27·9 kg/m2; obese, pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 28·0 kg/m2 (the specific BMI reference values for Chinese as defined by the China Public Union of Nutrition).
Comparison of cognitive views on pregnancy health between participants with and without gestational diabetes mellitus
The cognitive views on pregnancy health between GDM+ and GDM− women are compared in Table 4. Women who regarded nausea and vomiting-caused insufficient food intake as relevant to fetal health problems were associated with an increased risk for GDM (P = 0·018). Moreover, women who increased their dietary intake after morning sickness were at a higher risk of GDM (P = 0·038). On the other hand, GDM− women reported a higher frequency of receipt of pregnancy- and diet-related health education than GDM+ women (P = 0·043). Compared with the GDM− group, the GDM+ group was more likely to report having a family history of diabetes (P = 0·014). Nevertheless, the frequencies of family history with pancreatic disease between the two groups did not have statistical difference (P = 0·286).
GDM+/−, women with/without gestational diabetes mellitus according to results of an oral glucose tolerance test at the 24th to 28th gestational week.
The P values were calculated by comparison between GDM+ and GDM− women using the χ 2 test.
Multiple logistic regression analysis of associations of dietary habits, physical activity and cognitive views on pregnancy health with gestational diabetes mellitus
The adjusted odds ratios for factors that were significantly associated with GDM risk are summarized in Table 5. Women with higher BMI before pregnancy (OR = 1·151; 95 % CI 1·035, 1·280, P = 0·009) and with a greater weight gain during pregnancy (OR = 1·096; 95 % CI 1·004, 1·280, P = 0·041) were at an increased risk of GDM. Compared with women without a family history of diabetes, those with a positive family history were at increased risk of GDM (OR = 2·101; 95 % CI 1·040, 4·244, P = 0·038). Increased consumption of specific foods such as energy-dense snack foods and high-GI fruits was associated with increased risk of GDM (OR = 1·050; 95 % CI 1·029, 1·071, P = 0·001 and OR = 1·002; 95 % CI 1·000, 1·004, P = 0·017, respectively). In addition, women who believed that nausea and vomiting-caused reduction in food intake would cause fetal health problems were associated with an increased risk of GDM (OR = 1·911; 95 % CI 1·058, 3·453, P = 0·032).
GI, glycaemic index; MET, metabolic equivalents of task.
Discussion
In accordance with previous reports, the present study observed that some factors, such as increased pre-pregnancy BMI, greater weight gain during pregnancy and family history of diabetes, were strongly independent predictors of reduced glucose tolerance. In the present study we further observed that higher intakes of high-GI fruit and energy-dense snack foods during pregnancy elevated GDM risk. It was also found that increased physical activity was associated with a reduction of 1-h post-load plasma glucose in pregnant women. Lastly, unlimited food intake starting from the second trimester, due to an incorrect belief that morning sickness-caused reduction in food intake in the first trimester would cause fetal health problems, demonstrated a correlation with increased risk of GDM. Overall, the results of our study point to the significance of health education regarding the control of food intake during pregnancy, especially after the first trimester, and correct cognitive views on pregnancy-related health care.
It appears contradictory that our finding of increased intakes of high-GI fruits and energy-dense snack foods as contributory to GDM were not paralleled with an increased intake of total energy. In fact, both energy-dense snack foods (dietary fibre-free and usually supplemented with substantial amounts of sucrose, a disaccharide that easily hydrolyses to glucose in the gastrointestinal tract) and high-GI fruits are of high GI levels. While it is commonly accepted that high-GI foods are more rapidly digested and absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and thus are more contributory to diabetes than regular foods, our study only measured the plasma glucose level at a single point in time and investigated dietary status from the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy (12th gestational week) to the time of the OGTT (24th to 28th gestational week, covering only about a third of the gestation period); additionally, the pre-pregnancy energy consumption and dietary habits were not obtained. Therefore, the exact risk factors responsible for GDM may be complicated, wherein cognitive views and increased intake of high-GI foods may take a part; however, whether the increase in high-GI foods without the accompanying increase in total energy could be contributory to GDM remains to be investigated, probably including the potential involvement of pre-pregnancy dietary status as well. Additionally, the present study did not identify the risk factors for greater weight gain in women with GDM exactly, namely increased energy intake, decreased physical activity, or both of them, and this may be investigated in future studies.
In China, due to the implementation of the ‘one-child policy’ and the government's encouragement to females for a later marital age (>23 years) and later childbearing (>24 years), pregnant woman in a family, especially at an advanced age, are regarded as the most important person to be looked after by other family members. Most Chinese pregnant women stop or reduce the amount of housework, some even quit their jobs as soon as they find out they are pregnant( Reference Ma and Kong 34 , Reference Su, Li and Yang 35 ), and as a result their sedentary activities increase( Reference Su, Li and Yang 35 ). Even if they are used to doing housework, such as cooking, grocery shopping, washing the dishes and sweeping the floor before getting pregnant, it becomes their family members’ tasks thereafter. Moreover, according to Chinese traditional taboos, intensive limb activities, such as mopping the floor, moving furniture and carrying wet clothes (for drying them in the sun at open sites), may cause miscarriage or premature birth. Therefore, pregnant women are usually prevented from doing these things by their mother-in-law even if they would like to do them according to the modern education they have received( Reference Su, Li and Yang 35 ). These sedentary lifestyles may be associated with an increased risk of weight gain, obesity, GDM and pregnancy-induced hypertension( Reference Nascimento, Surita and Cecatti 36 , Reference Rooney, Schauberger and Mathiason 37 ). In fact, a much larger pregnant population may have abnormal glucose tolerance than the proportion with GDM, which is also associated with maternal complications such as pregnant hypotension, pre-eclampsia, macrosomia and birth trauma( Reference Scholl, Sowers and Chen 11 , Reference Oken, Ning and Rifas-Shiman 27 ). Therefore most pregnant Chinese women should have the opportunity to be educated and understand they do not have to quit regular daily physical activity, including housework; on the contrary, for some who are engaged in sedentary job categories, for example an office clerk, it is necessary to add (but not avoid) some physical exercise.
The native people investigated in the present study are accustomed to consuming Cantonese Dim Sum and tropical fruits which are energy-dense and/or high-GI foods( Reference Huang 38 ). According to our results, high-GI and energy-dense foods, as the common snacks in all participants between regular meals, were more consumed by GDM+ women. Excessive intake of these foods has been proposed to increase the body's demand for insulin, and this may lead to insulin resistance, impaired pancreatic β-cell function and eventually type 2 diabetes, as specialized by GDM( Reference Salmeron, Manson and Stampfer 39 , Reference Schulze, Liu and Rimm 40 ).
Since, as described above, incorrect cognitive views on pregnancy-related health care may be associated with GDM in Chinese pregnant women, for the prevention and control of GDM, it is important that individualized health education, dietary and exercise advice is offered to pregnant as well as pre-pregnant women. Due to the limited time for each pregnant woman in out-patient services in China, it is highly recommended to establish a GDM education group in each hospital. This group should include dietitians, maternity nurses and obstetricians, for regular consultation services, particularly for correction of the wrong points of view on pregnancy-related adjustments in diet and physical activities. This health education is not only a task for hospitals, but also community health carers. In summary, an intensive health education may help pregnant women, especially those with GDM, to understand their health conditions and may guide them in choosing a healthy (case-specific) lifestyle with a low risk of GDM.
Study limitations
Our study has some limitations. First, the relatively small number of observed cases of GDM limited our ability to reach more solid conclusions. Second, as the results of our assessment on physical activity and diet are specific to only a small window of a much longer period of gestation, our study cannot reflect situations in other gestational stages than 24 to 28 weeks. Moreover, as in any investigative study on human populations which relies on self-reported questions, the obtained dietary status and the intensity of physical activities were also self-reported and with relatively low accuracy compared with experimentally controlled studies.
Conclusion
Intensive health education that provides guidance on reasonable dietary behaviour and adequate physical activities is highly in demand for the control of GDM, and further work is needed to better understand the relationship between diet, physical activity, health education and glucose disturbances during pregnancy.
Acknowledgements
Sources of funding: This research was supported by the President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (NO: 2010C016). The funder had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflicts of interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions: Q.L. and R.X. have contributed equally to this work. Q.L., Y.L., L.S. and B.L. contributed to the design of the research. Q.L., R.X. and J.C. performed the interviews of participants with questionnaires. L.W. performed the statistical analysis. Q.L. and R.X. drafted the manuscript. Q.L. was supervised by Y.L. and B.L. in the study idea and survey; B.L. also supervised the research and statistical analysis. Y.L. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements: The authors thank all participants in the study. The authors greatly appreciate support from the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the Department of Endocrinology at Nanfang Hospital.