Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:11:10.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of household land management on cropland topsoil organic carbon storage at plot scale in a red earth soil area of South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

S. FENG
Affiliation:
China Centre for Land Policy Research, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
S. TAN
Affiliation:
China Centre for Land Policy Research, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
A. ZHANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
Q. ZHANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
G. PAN*
Affiliation:
China Centre for Land Policy Research, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
F. QU
Affiliation:
China Centre for Land Policy Research, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
P. SMITH
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK
L. LI
Affiliation:
Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China
X. ZHANG
Affiliation:
Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang, Nanjing 210095, China Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An inventory of topsoil soil organic carbon (SOC) content in household farms was performed in a village from a red earth region in Jiangxi Province, China in 2003. In this region, the farmland managed by each household is fragmented, consisting of several plots of land that are not necessarily adjacent to each other. A statistical analysis of SOC variation with land use and household management type, and with crop management practices was conducted. Plot size ranged from 0·007 to 0·630 ha with a mean of 0·1 ha, and SOC content ranged from 1·72 to 25·2 g/kg, varying widely with a variety of land management and agricultural practices, arising from individual household behaviours. The mean SOC content in plot size <0·1 ha was 20% lower than in plot size ⩾0·1 ha. SOC of dry crop plots was 70% lower than that in rice paddies, and SOC of plots contracted from the village was almost double that of plots leased from other householders. Moreover, a 30% increase in SOC was observed with green manure cultivation, and a 55% increase under triple cropping. The difference in SOC levels between the least and most favourable cases of household land management and agricultural practice was up to 150%. The results suggest that policies targeted at crop management alone may not deliver the expected SOC benefits if household land management is also not improved.

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.

INTRODUCTION

Maintaining or increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in croplands has been promoted as a ‘win–win’ strategy by enhancing soil productivity and increasing the terrestrial C stock, thereby mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture (Lal Reference Lal2004a). Crop management may have great potential for mitigating climate change in agriculture through C sequestration (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Martino, Cai, Gwary, Janzen, Kumar, McCarl, Ogle, O'Mara, Rice, Scholes, Sirotenko, Howden, McAllister, Pan, Romanenkov, Schneider and Towprayoon2007). This potential, however, will be realized only in the long-run through judicious land use and recommended management practices (Lal Reference Lal2002, Reference Lal2004a), whereas the choice among these may vary with the market C price (Lewandrowski et al. Reference Lewandrowski, Peters, Jones, House, Sperow, Eve and Paustian2004; Smith & Trines Reference Smith and Trines2007).

Management practices that lead to an increase in organic inputs (biomass and manure) add C to the soil, improve microbial function and promote SOC accumulation. It is well known that improved crop management, such as reduced tillage and intensified cropping to enhance C input to the soil, favours SOC sequestration (Lal Reference Lal2004a; Ogle et al. Reference Ogle, Breidt and Paustian2005). Land use changes and management, however, have significant effects on world SOC storage and sequestration for potential mitigation of global climate change (Guo & Gifford Reference Guo and Gifford2002; Schlamadinger et al. Reference Schlamadinger, Bird, Johns, Brown, Canadell, Ciccarese, Dutschke, Fiedler, Fischlin, Fearnside, Forner, Freibauer, Frumhoff, Hoehne, Kirschbaum, Labat, Marland, Michaelowa, Montanarella, Moutinho, Murdiyarso, Pena, Pingoud, Rakonczay, Rametsteiner, Rock, Sanz, Schneider, Shvidenko, Skutsch, Smith, Somogyi, Trines, Ward and Yamagata2007; Smith Reference Smith2008). There have been a few studies dealing with changes in SOC storage under land use and management change in croplands (Osher et al. Reference Osher, Matson and Amundson2003; Smith Reference Smith2008).

In developing countries, constraints on land resource availability due to fragmented croplands and small-scale farm management systems impact on sustainable agriculture and food security (Simmons Reference Simmons, Maunder and Renborg1986; Niroula & Thapa Reference Niroula and Thapa2005; Rahman & Rahman Reference Rahman and Rahman2009). Soil organic matter has generally been recognized as providing a key soil function for sustainable agriculture (Smith et al. Reference Smith, Petersen and Needelman1999; Carter Reference Carter2002), and may be influenced by changes in land use intensity and land management effects (Grandy & Robertson Reference Grandy and Robertson2007). The potential roles of improved land use and management in enhancing C stocks in agricultural soils for developing countries have often been addressed (García-Oliva & Masera Reference García-Oliva and Masera2004; Milne et al. Reference Milne, Paustian, Easter, Sessay, Al-Adamat, Batjes, Bernoux, Bhattacharyya, Cerri, Cerri, Coleman, Falloon, Feller, Gicheru, Kamoni, Killian, Pal, Powlson, Williams and Rawajfih2007; Smith & Trines Reference Smith and Trines2007; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Martino, Cai, Gwary, Janzen, Kumar, McCarl, Ogle, O'Mara, Rice, Scholes, Sirotenko, Howden, McAllister, Pan, Romanenkov, Schneider and Towprayoon2007). However, a number of land policy and management barriers will probably prevent soil C sequestration benefits for developing countries, and proper policies for world climate and trade are required for encouraging C sequestration and climate change mitigation in agriculture in less developed countries (de Costa & Sangakkara Reference De Costa and Sangakkara2006; Smith & Trines Reference Smith and Trines2007; Eitzinger et al. Reference Eitzinger, Orlandini, Stefanski and Naylor2010). C sequestration in croplands of developing countries will depend on the existing performance of these management practices as implemented by household farmers, but there have been very few studies on the impacts of household land management (land use, land tenure status and land fragmentation) on SOC status and sequestration potential of soils.

China has experienced profound changes in land use, land cover and land management systems over the last 50 years. Since the late 1970s, farmland management has shifted from collective farming to a Household Responsibility System, which has resulted in small-scale household farms with intense land fragmentation (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink and Qu2006). The impacts of farmland management on cropland soil quality and productivity have been investigated, examining the impacts of land fragmentation (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008), property rights settings (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Huang, Scott, Brandt and Zhang2003) and/or household behaviours related to technology transfer (Zhang & Xu Reference Zhang and Xu1996; Ou-Yang et al. Reference Ou-Yang, Yu and Zhang2003). With growing concerns for climate change mitigation in agriculture, sequestration of SOC in croplands may play a key role in off-setting the increasing GHG emissions in China (Lal Reference Lal2004b; Pan & Zhao Reference Pan and Zhao2005; Pan Reference Pan2009). Changes in SOC storage and dynamics of China's croplands have been increasingly studied under land use change (Song et al. Reference Song, Li, Pan and Zhang2005; Hou et al. Reference Hou, Xu and Pan2007; Li et al. Reference Li, Pan and Zhang2007), fertilization practice (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Pan, Tian, Li, Zhang and Han2010), cropping and rotation (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Rui, He, Wu, Luo, Bian and Zhang2006) and tillage practice (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Pan and Tian2009). While studies have indicated a significant biophysical potential for SOC sequestration in China's croplands (Lal Reference Lal2002, Reference Lal2004b; Pan et al. Reference Pan, Xu, Smith, Pan and Lal2010), there has been little information on how, and to what extent, household farm management behaviours impact on SOC storage and the C sequestration capacity of China's croplands. This information gap limits the ability to assess the realizable contribution of SOC sequestration to the mitigation of GHGs in China in the future and weakens the development of climate policy for cropland management (Pan Reference Pan2009).

The purpose of the present paper is to quantify the variation of SOC storage in household farms under different land management settings, with respect to the land tenure status, household farm size and land use, using the dataset from a farm inventory conducted in 2003. From this analysis, the aim is to provide information for policy-making for improving farm management to enhance C sequestration and GHG mitigation in China's agriculture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Household farm inventory

An inventory of crop production and soil management at household farm scale was conducted in Banqiao village in Honghu Township, Yujiang County (28°04′–28°37′N, 116°41′–117°09′E, 45–50 m asl), Jiangxi Province, China (Fig. 1) in February 2003. This village is considered representative of the typical rural conditions that can be found in Northeast Jiangxi Province and in the much larger hilly area of Southeast China with rice-based production systems (Kuiper et al. Reference Kuiper, Heerink, Tan, Ren and Shi2001). The topography of the area is terraced Quaternary red earth. The local climate is governed by a subtropical monsoon, with a mean annual temperature of 17·2–18·1°C and annual precipitation of 1700–1800 mm, with 0·7 of that occurring in late April–early July for the last two decades (Jiangxi Bureau of Land Management – JBLM 1991). The croplands are mainly derived from red soils, which are extensive in this area. The soil type in the rice paddies was classified as hydro-agric Stagnic Anthrosols, according to Chinese Soil Taxonomy (Gong et al. Reference Gong, Zhang and Chen2007), and as typic Paleudults according to Soil Taxonomy (SSS-USDA 1999), whereas those for dry croplands were Inceptic Paleudults (SSS-USDA 1999). Poor soil fertility and crop productivity in this area are apparent due to degradation of the cultivated red-earth-derived soils (Zhao Reference Zhao2002).

Fig. 1. Sketch map of Jiangxi Province of China showing the location of the surveyed village in yellow solid circle.

The village surveyed was among those of poor agricultural productivity within the least developed economy in Jiangxi, China during 1970–90s, and most of the farmers lived on agricultural output before the survey was conducted in 2003 (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008). The village had 220 households and a population of 900 in 2002, divided into four hamlets with 113·3 ha of farmland in total, giving a land-use density of 0·15 ha per capita. Of the total farmland area, irrigated rice paddies accounted for 82·3 ha mostly with double rice cropping, and a further 31·1 ha farmland was dry croplands, mainly peanuts and vegetables plus citrus trees. The average rice yield in 2002 was 5·1 t/ha. Chemical fertilizers were commonly applied, with very limited use of farmyard manure. The land tenure system shifted to the Household Responsibility System in 1984; farmlands were allocated to households according to family size and labour force, and by considering soil quality and distance from the village.

For the survey, 15 households, managing a total of 105 plots, were randomly selected from a single hamlet within the whole area of 113·3 ha farmland affiliated with the village (Banqiao). Plot size, history of cultivation, yield and management (including land tenure status, crop rotation system, fertilization, straw return and soil fertility condition) for the past 5 years were recorded for each of the 105 plots. Rice paddies in terraces with pump irrigation have been developed since the 1960s, whereas dry land crops have persisted in the village for over 100 years. The 105 plots sampled were distributed randomly among the total farmland affiliated with the village.

Soil sample collection

Topsoil samples of all the plots associated with the 15 households surveyed were collected at a depth of 0–150 mm using a soil core sampler (Eijkelkamp, The Netherlands) in late February 2003, when no crop growth was present. A composite sample was formed with three randomly selected subsamples for each plot, mixed after sampling in the field. Each sample was placed in a stainless-steel box and shipped to the laboratory within 3 days of sampling. The basic soil physical and chemical properties of the soils tested are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Basic soil properties (mean±s.d.) of the topsoil samples (0–150 mm) (n=105)

Soil property determination

Soil total organic C and nitrogen (N) were measured using an Elementar Vario MAX CNS Analyser (Elementar GmbH, Germany). The determinations of soil pH (H2O), available phosphorus and potassium and clay content were conducted following the protocol described by Lu (Reference Lu2000). All the extraction and determinations were performed in duplicate. The topsoil SOC values of croplands from the village surveyed and measured during the Second National Soil Survey, completed in 1985, were retrieved from the records available in the local soil survey service of Yujiang County.

Statistical analysis

Data were processed using MS-Excel 2003 in MS-Windows 2003. Statistical differences in SOC between the land use types and land tenure status were tested with analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS 11.0 statistical package (SPSS 2001). Statistical significance was defined at P<0·05.

RESULTS

Land management status of the households surveyed

The basic information on the land tenure and land use status of the household farmland is presented in Table 2. The mean size of the households surveyed was 4·5 persons with, on average, 0·67 ha farmland per household. The land use density of 0·15 ha per capita is larger than the mean for China as a whole, which was 0·09 ha per capita in 2004, reported by the Ministry of Land and Resources through a national land use change survey (NACOC & FASC 1999). Of the total 105 plots surveyed, 83 were used for rice paddies and 22 were for dry croplands, reflecting the rice-dominated agriculture in South China. Rice cultivation occupied 0·9 of the total cultivated area in Jiangxi in the late 1980s (JBLM 1991) and 0·85 of the total of the local county of Yujiang (SSOYC 1986). Reform of the land tenure system was finalized in 1985; most of the plots surveyed were used by households who contracted them directly from the village collective. However, 21 plots were leased from other households within the same village for at least one crop growing season.

Table 2. General status of land management and farmland plot size (mean±s.d.) of the 15 households surveyed in Banqiao village

As shown in Fig. 2, the plot size of the household farmlands followed a skewed distribution and ranged from 0·01 to 0·63 ha, with the majority of plots being small. The mean plot size of 0·11 ha for the household farmland plots surveyed was close to that of China as a whole (0·09 ha). A large degree of land fragmentation occurred in these household farmlands; 47 plots had a mean size of 0·05 ha compared to a mean size of 0·22 ha in the 58 plots with a plot size more than 0·1 ha (Table 2). Furthermore, a significantly higher degree of land fragmentation was associated with leased plots and with dry croplands (Table 2). These features of the land tenure system make it more difficult to enhance productivity and, in turn, SOC accumulation of the croplands.

Fig. 2. Observation frequency of size distribution of the 105 plots occupied by the households surveyed.

Variation of SOC content with land management

Following a quasi-normal distribution (Fig. 3), which was statistically tested, the SOC contents of the 105 plots ranged from 1·7 to 25·2 g/kg with a mean (±s.d.) of 13±6·1 g/kg. Thus, the variability of plot SOC is significantly smaller than the variability of plot area itself. The variation of topsoil SOC content under different status of land tenure, land fragmentation and land use is presented in Fig. 4. Type of land use had profound impacts on SOC contents. The majority of the 105 plots were rice paddies with a mean SOC content of 13·95 g/kg, being significantly higher (70% higher, on average) than the dry croplands. This is in general agreement with previous findings of much higher SOC contents in rice paddy soil than in dry croplands (Pan et al. Reference Pan, Li, Wu and Zhang2004; Song et al. Reference Song, Li, Pan and Zhang2005). SOC contents were much higher in contracted than in leased plots, with the mean value of the former almost double the latter. The effect of land fragmentation on SOC content was observed to be significantly smaller, as plots <0·1 ha had significantly lower SOC levels (by up to 20% on average) than those >0·1 ha. Land fragmentation associated with farm size had an impact on SOC. For households with smaller numbers of plots, those managed by households with a greater total area of farmland showed significantly higher SOC contents (by 3·4 g/kg on average) than those managed by households with smaller total area of farmland in 2003 (Table 3). Compared to the original SOC level in 1985, when the Household Responsibility System was newly implemented, SOC accumulation of 6·12 g/kg was found in plots managed by households with >0·7 ha total farmland area, whereas it was 1 g/kg for plots managed by households with <0·7 ha total farmland. Plots managed by households with larger farm size and smaller numbers of plots were significantly richer in SOC than those managed by households with larger numbers of plots. Since the implementation of the Household Responsibility System, SOC has increased in the larger household farmlands, by over 6 g/kg on average, compared to no significant increase in those with smaller total farmland area. The findings suggest a large interactive impact of land tenure system and land use on both SOC storage and SOC dynamics of household farmlands.

Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of topsoil organic C content of the 105 plots occupied by the households surveyed.

Fig. 4. Variation of topsoil organic carbon content with land management, land use and fragmentation of the 105 plots surveyed. Different capital letters above the bar indicate significant difference at P<0·05 between types in a same block.

Table 3. Changes in farmland topsoil SOC (g/kg; mean±sd) with number and area of plots affiliated to the 15 surveyed households

Variation of topsoil SOC contents with agricultural management practices

The area is characterized as being of low productivity for rice due to the poor soil quality and low-nutrient pools, as the soils on the red soil terrace have suffered from acidity and severe soil erosion (Zhao Reference Zhao2002). Previously, in order to meet the demand for higher cereal production, rice was double- or triple-cropped, and without conservation practices this has largely exhausted the soil fertility. Improved agricultural management in the area would entail a cropping system with straw return and green manure cultivation (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink and Qu2006, Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008). As seen in Table 4, most of the plots had been cultivated with double or triple cropping of rice, with very little green manure cultivation or straw return. For dry croplands, there was a single cropping of peanuts and fruit trees with poor soil conditions, with double and triple cropping predominantly used for rice–rice and rice–rice–winter vegetable, respectively (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink and Qu2006, Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008). While the topsoil SOC under single cropping of dry crops tended to be much lower than the double and triple cropping with rice, there was only a small difference in SOC contents between the double- and triple-cropped plots. Cultivation of green manure crops, mainly alfalfa in this region, yielded significantly higher SOC contents than the non-green manure cultivated plots (3·3 g/kg more on average). However, straw return resulted in an increase in SOC by c. 5 g/kg compared to plots without straw return. Comparatively, the effect of management practices on topsoil SOC was greatest with straw return, followed by green manure cultivation and least with rice cropping intensity.

Table 4. Topsoil SOC content (mean±s.d.) of plots with different agricultural management practices

DISCUSSION

Topsoil SOC dynamics of the surveyed farmlands

The mean (±s.d.) topsoil SOC level of the village farmlands, analysed and reported for the Second National Soil Survey of Jiangxi in 1985 for the same soil sampling depth, were 12±4·8 and 7±2·9 g/kg for rice paddies and dry croplands, respectively (Q. Zhang, personal communication). However, in the present study, the household farmlands surveyed in 2003 had topsoil SOC contents of 14±5·7 and 8±5·2 g/kg for rice paddies and dry croplands, respectively (Fig. 4). The changes in deep profile with management practices seemed insignificant (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Zhang and Pan2006) and were not taken into account in the present paper. There was an increase in topsoil SOC at 2·3 and 1·2 g/kg of the surveyed plots, although the current level was lower than the provincial mean of 17±6·2 and 9±4·4 g/kg reported by Huang (Reference Huang1999) for rice paddies and dry croplands, respectively.

The general trend of SOC increase in the present croplands by plot survey is in accordance with previous findings at the county level in Yixing (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Li, Pan, Wang, Jiang and Huang2004) and Wujiang (Hou et al. Reference Hou, Xu and Pan2007) from the Tai Lake region, for Jiangsu province level (Liao et al. Reference Liao, Zhang, Li, Pan, Smith, Jin and Wu2009) and across China's croplands (Pan et al. Reference Pan, Xu, Smith, Pan and Lal2010). Greater SOC enhancement in rice paddies than in dry croplands has also been reported at the regional scale (Hou et al. Reference Hou, Xu and Pan2007; Xu et al. Reference Xu, Pan and Sun2009), and with long-term experiments (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Pan and Tian2009, Reference Wang, Pan, Tian, Li, Zhang and Han2010) for generally higher inputs and lower decomposition under submerged conditions in rice paddies than in dry croplands. The mean rate of increase for rice paddies and dry croplands of 0·14 and 0·07 g/kg/yr, respectively, are somewhat higher than those of 0·11 and 0·06 g/kg/yr across China's croplands (Pan et al. Reference Pan, Xu, Smith, Pan and Lal2010). This could be, in part, attributed to the chemical protection of SOC by binding to oxyhydrates in the soils derived from red earth (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Song, Pan, Li and Zhang2009a). Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Pan., Li and Zhang2009b) reported a faster and greater C sequestration in a red-soil-derived paddy under long-term experiments when comparing with other two rice paddy soils lower in free oxyhydrates.

However, higher increases have been reported for croplands from adjacent areas: Xu et al. (Reference Xu, Pan and Sun2009) showed mean increases of 0·25 and 0·09 g/kg/yr in rice paddies and dry croplands, respectively, at the county level in Guichi, Anhui Province, with predominantly lowland croplands derived mainly from wetlands along the Yangtze River. In a previous study, an increase in SOC of 0·28 g/kg/yr was observed during 1985–2002 in the rice paddies in Yixing County, Jiangsu Province (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Li, Pan, Wang, Jiang and Huang2004), where larger-scale farms had been developed, and the cropping system of rice–rape and rice–winter fallow had been dominant since the late 1980s, with rapid industrialization (Ma & Liu Reference Ma and Liu2009). Thus, the increase in SOC of the surveyed household farmlands seemed comparatively smaller. This, together with variation of SOC contents with the different farm scales and plot sizes may reflect the impacts of land tenure arrangements and land fragmentation on cropland SOC storage and enhancement.

Land tenure effects on cropland SOC in interaction with crop management

The wide variation (Fig. 3, Tables 3 and 4) of plot topsoil SOC level reflected the interactive effects of agricultural management practices and household land management. Agricultural management practices had differing effects on topsoil SOC; the increases were: 29·3% for green manure cultivation; 41·6% for straw return; 43·8% for rice cropping intensity (16±5·4 g/kg under double rice to 11±4·9 g/kg under single rice); and 54·9% for total cropping intensity (15±5·7 g/kg under triple cropping to 9±6·9 g/kg under single crop, mainly of dry crops). In contrast, aspects of household land management showed land fragmentation to have an effect on topsoil SOC: plots over 0.1 ha had 19·3% more SOC than plots smaller than 0·1 ha; as did land use type: rice paddies had 72·2% more SOC than dry croplands; and land tenure status showed land managed under direct contract had 96·5% more SOC than leased land (Fig. 4). While the effects of land fragmentation on crop productivity and resource use efficiency have been widely debated (Wan & Cheng Reference Wan and Cheng1996; Su & Wang Reference Su and Wang2002; Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink and Qu2006, Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008), fragmentation was not a critical factor in the present study. A large reduction in SOC did occur when paddy was converted to dry cropland, which has also been observed elsewhere (Hou et al. Reference Hou, Xu and Pan2007; Li et al. Reference Li, Pan and Zhang2007). While agricultural management practices had direct effects on SOC through changes in organic matter input from the crop (especially with straw return and green manure cultivation), land tenure status had indirect effects through the above-mentioned organic matter input. Conservation practices have largely been neglected by the household farmers over the last decade (Wan & Cheng Reference Wan and Cheng1996, Reference Wan and Cheng2001, Reference Wang and Chen2005; Yu et al. Reference Yu, Huang, Scott, Brandt and Zhang2003; Wang Reference Wang2004; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Miao, Jiang, Xu and Jiao2008). For leased farmlands, the land managers were more concerned with obtaining adequate yield rather than ensuring soil quality and fertility (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Huang, Scott, Brandt and Zhang2003; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Miao, Jiang, Xu and Jiao2008). In addition, most of the fragmented, small cropland plots in the village were the dry croplands on degraded red earth and with less accessible irrigation. Due to the relatively high cost of managing these fragmented lands of poor productivity, there is no incentive for the farmers to manage the land carefully (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008). In fact, the fragmented, poor croplands some distance away from the village were those usually put for lease and used for dry crop production (Tan et al. Reference Tan, Heerink, Kruseman and Qu2008), which has resulted in reduced storage of SOC overall.

To examine the effect of good v. poor household and agricultural management, a subset of the plots was grouped into two extreme management scenarios. Scenario I consisted of 19 plots under double-cropped rice with straw return or green manure application, under direct contract and >0·1 ha. Scenario II comprised 15 plots of dry croplands without green manure or straw return, under lease and <0·1 ha. Land tenure and the agricultural management practices of croplands can have large synergistic effects on SOC storage. Storage of topsoil SOC was much smaller (7±2·10 g/kg on average) in poorly managed plots (Scenario II) compared to those under the beneficial land use and management of rice paddies of Scenario I (18±5·3 g/kg on average). This suggests a large gap in the SOC stock of farmlands due to household land management, which may thus have great impacts on SOC levels in China's croplands superimposing the agricultural management effects at farm scale.

Concern has been expressed previously that China's agriculture has been constrained by both the shortage of arable land and land fragmentation (Wan & Cheng Reference Wan and Cheng1996; Su & Wang Reference Su and Wang2002; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Liu and Davis2005). The need for improved management to enhance cereal production and increase agricultural production efficiency has often been highlighted (Zhang & Xu Reference Zhang and Xu1996; Luo Reference Luo2008; Lu & Zhang Reference Lu and Zhang2008; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Miao, Jiang, Xu and Jiao2008; Jiang Reference Jiang2009; Ma & Liu Reference Ma and Liu2009). Management for enhancing crop productivity will benefit soil C sequestration (Lal Reference Lal2004a), and organic C accumulation favours crop productivity in China's croplands, especially for rice paddies (Pan & Zhao Reference Pan and Zhao2005; Pan et al. Reference Pan, Smith and Pan2009a, Reference Pan, Zhou, Li, Smith, Li, Qiu, Zhang, Xu, Shen and Chenb). Thus, developing a sound household land management system, in addition to good agricultural management practices, is necessary to help ensure cereal production, and C sequestration for mitigating GHG emissions in China. Therefore, incentives for encouraging good household farm management practices at the appropriate scale should be taken into account in China's national action plan for climate mitigation.

More broadly, the land tenure and household land management system seen in this region is very common throughout China, and has a number of similarities with systems in many other developing countries. The village studied was among those living on agricultural production in a rural area far from the cities (at least 150 km from the nearest city of Yingtang, Jiangxi as shown in Fig. 1). The size and total area, as well as the crop production, were typical for the south China's rural area; the mean size of total farmlands per household was <1 ha. Crop production was mainly rice, plus some dry crops in the rolling uplands with infertile soils. Most of the south Asian and African countries previously had such landform and agriculture as well as land tenure systems in rural areas (McPherson Reference McPherson1982; Otsuka et al. Reference Otsuka, Suyanto, Sonobe and Tomish2001; Suyanto et al. Reference Suyanto, Thomas and Otsuka2001; Niroula & Thapa Reference Niroula and Thapa2005; de Costa & Sangakkara Reference De Costa and Sangakkara2006). The present case study provides rare quantitative information linking limits in the efficacy in soil C storage with potential barriers to implementation, and may serve as a template for investigating barriers to implementation of climate mitigation practices in agriculture elsewhere in the developing world.

This work was a joint contribution from the Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture and the China Centre for Land Policy Research, with which Genxing Pan acts as an adjunct professor and Shuyi Feng as a senior research scientist, of Nanjing Agricultural University. This study was partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants 407100190002 and 70833001. Project funding for the data synthesis from the Ministry of Education is also acknowledged. Pete Smith is a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award and a UK BBSRC China Partnership Award holder. Xuhui Zhang is a Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Aberdeen.

References

REFERENCES

Carter, M. R. (2002). Soil quality for sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agronomy Journal 94, 3847.Google Scholar
De Costa, W. A. J. M. & Sangakkara, U. R. (2006). Agronomic regeneration of soil fertility in tropical Asian smallholder uplands for sustainable food production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 111133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eitzinger, J., Orlandini, S., Stefanski, R. & Naylor, R. E. L. (2010). Climate change and agriculture: introductory editorial. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 148, 499500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Oliva, F. & Masera, O. R. (2004). Assessment and measurement issues related to soil carbon sequestration in land use, land use change, and forestry (LULUCF) projects under the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 65, 347364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, Z. T., Zhang, G. L. & Chen, Z. C. (2007). Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy. Beijing: China Science Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Grandy, A. S. & Robertson, G. P. (2007). Land use intensity effects on soil C accumulation rates and mechanisms. Ecosystems 10, 5873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, L. B. & Gifford, R. M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology 8, 345360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, P. C., Xu, X. D. & Pan, G. (2007). Influence of land use change on topsoil organic carbon stock a case study of Wujiang Municipality. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University 32, 6872 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Huang, G. Q. (1999). Cropland resources and the sustainable use of Jiangxi. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 11 (Suppl.), 4853 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Jiang, D. Y. (2009). Five issues of developing proper scale up farmland management. Rural Economy of Jiangsu 2009, 2124 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Jiangxi Bureau of Land Management (JBLM) (1991). Soils of Jiangxi. Beijing: China Agricultural Science & Technology Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Kuiper, M., Heerink, N., Tan, S., Ren, Q. & Shi, X. (2001). Report of Village Selection for the Three Village Survey. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (2002). Soil carbon sequestration in China through agricultural intensification, and restoration of degraded and desertified ecosystems. Land Degradation and Development 13, 469478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. (2004 a). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 16231627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lal, R. (2004 b). Offsetting China's CO2 emissions by soil carbon sequestration. Climatic Change 65, 263275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandrowski, J., Peters, M., Jones, C., House, R., Sperow, M., Eve, M. & Paustian, K. (2004). Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector. Technical Bulletin No. TB-1909. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, USDA.Google Scholar
Li, Z. P., Pan, G. & Zhang, X. H. (2007). Topsoil organic carbon pool and 13C natural abundance changes from a paddy after 3 years corn cultivation. Acta Pedologica Sinica 44, 244251 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Liao, Q. L., Zhang, X. H., Li, Z. P., Pan, G., Smith, P., Jin, Y. & Wu, X. M. (2009). Increase in soil organic carbon stock over the last two decades in China's Jiangsu Province. Global Change Biology 15, 861875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, R. K. (2000). Analytical Method of Soil Agricultural Chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Lu, R. S. & Zhang, Y. X. (2008). The problem of increasing sustainably the income from agriculture for China's farmers. Agriculture Rural Economy 6, 2627 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Luo, Q. (2008). Factors influencing proper scale up management in China's agriculture. Economic Research Guide 2008, 1213 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Ma, K. P. & Liu, Y. (2009). Proper scale up land management: a necessity option for modern China's agriculture. Rural Economy of Jiangsu 2009, 1416 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
McPherson, M. (1982). Land Fragmentation: a Selected Literature Review. Development Discussion Paper, No. 141. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Milne, E., Paustian, K., Easter, M., Sessay, M., Al-Adamat, R., Batjes, N. H., Bernoux, M., Bhattacharyya, T., Cerri, C. C., Cerri, C. E. P., Coleman, K., Falloon, P., Feller, C., Gicheru, P., Kamoni, P., Killian, K., Pal, D. K., Powlson, D. S., Williams, S. & Rawajfih, Z. (2007). An increased understanding of soil organic carbon stocks and changes in non-temperate areas: national and global implications. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122, 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Agricultural Census Office of China (NACOC) and Food and Agricultural Statistics Census, China (FASC). (1999). Abstract of the First National Agricultural Census in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
Niroula, G. S. & Thapa, G. B. (2005). Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lessons learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22, 358372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogle, S. M., Breidt, F. J. & Paustian, K. (2005). Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry 72, 87121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osher, L. J., Matson, P. A. & Amundson, R. (2003) Effect of land use change on soil carbon in Hawaii. Biogeochemistry 65, 213232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, K., Suyanto, S., Sonobe, T. & Tomish, T. P. (2001). Evolution of land tenure institutions and development of agroforestry: evidence from customary land areas of Sumatra. Agricultural Economics 25, 85101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou-Yang, J. L., Yu, Z. R. & Zhang, F. R. (2003). The study of the change of soil quality and the analysis of farm household based on eco-economy zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica 23, 11471155 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Pan, G. X. (2009). Stock, dynamics of soil organic carbon of China and the role in climate change mitigation. Advance in Climate Change Research 5 (Suppl.), 1118.Google Scholar
Pan, G. X., Li, L. Q., Wu, L. S. & Zhang, X. H. (2004). Storage and sequestration potential of topsoil organic carbon in China's paddy soils. Global Change Biology 10, 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, G. X., Smith, P. & Pan, W. N. (2009 a). The role of soil organic matter in maintaining the productivity and yield stability of cereals in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 129, 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, G. X., Xu, X. W., Smith, P., Pan, W. N. & Lal, R. (2010). An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China's croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 136, 133138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, G. X. & Zhao, Q. (2005). Study on evolution of organic carbon stock in agricultural soils of China: facing the challenge of global change and food security. Advances in Earth Science 20, 384393 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Pan, G. X., Zhou, P., Li, Z. P., Smith, P., Li, L. Q., Qiu, D. S., Zhang, X. H., Xu, X. B., Shen, S. G. & Chen, X. M. (2009 b). Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 131, 274280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, S. & Rahman, M. (2009). Impact of land fragmentation and resource ownership on productivity and efficiency: the case of rice producers in Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 26, 95103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlamadinger, B., Bird, N., Johns, T., Brown, S., Canadell, J., Ciccarese, L., Dutschke, M., Fiedler, J., Fischlin, A., Fearnside, P., Forner, C., Freibauer, A., Frumhoff, P., Hoehne, N., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Labat, A., Marland, G., Michaelowa, A., Montanarella, L., Moutinho, P., Murdiyarso, D., Pena, N., Pingoud, K., Rakonczay, Z., Rametsteiner, E., Rock, J., Sanz, M. J., Schneider, U. A., Shvidenko, A., Skutsch, M., Smith, P., Somogyi, Z., Trines, E., Ward, M. & Yamagata, Y. (2007). A synopsis of land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) under the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakech Accords. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, S. R. (1986). Land fragmentation in developing countries: the optimal choice and policy implications. In Agriculture in a Turbulent World Economy: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of Agricultural Economists, Malaga, Spain, 26 Aug–4 Sep 1985 (Eds Maunder, A. & Renborg, U.), pp. 703716. London: Gower Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Smith, O. H., Petersen, G. W. & Needelman, B. A. (1999). Environmental indicators of agro-ecosystems. Advances in Agronomy 69, 7597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. (2008). Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 81, 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, B., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G. X., Romanenkov, V., Schneider, U. & Towprayoon, S. (2007). Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118, 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. & Trines, E. (2007). Agricultural measures for mitigating climate change: will the barriers prevent any benefits to developing countries? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 4, 173175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Office of Yujiang County (SSOYC). (1986). Soils of Yujiang County: A Soil Survey Report. Yujiang, Jiangxi: SSOYC (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff, USDA (SSS-USDA) (1999). Soil Taxonomy: a Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA-ARS.Google Scholar
Song, G. H., Li, L. Q., Pan, G. X. & Zhang, Q. (2005). Topsoil organic carbon storage of China and its loss by cultivation. Biogeochemistry 74, 4762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS (2001). SPSS Base 11 for Windows: User's Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Su, X. X. & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Land fragmentation and grain production: a case study of Laixi City, Shandong Province, China. China Rural Economy 4, 2228 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Suyanto, S., Thomas, P. T. & Otsuka, K. (2001). Land tenure and farm management efficiency: the case of paddy and cinnamon production in customary land areas of Sumatra. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45, 411436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kruseman, G. & Qu, F. (2008). Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in Northeastern Jiangxi province, P.R. China. China Economic Review 19, 347358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S., Heerink, N. & Qu, F. (2006). Land fragmentation and its driving forces in China. Land Use Policy 23, 272285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, G. H. & Cheng, E. (2001). Effects of land fragmentation and returns to scale in the Chinese farming sector. Applied Economics 33, 183194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, G. H. & Cheng, E. J. (1996). China's cereals production with scaling and land fragmentation. China Rural Survey 3, 3136 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, C. J., Pan, G. X. & Tian, Y. G. (2009). Characteristics of cropland topsoil organic carbon dynamics under different conservation tillage treatments based on long-term agro-ecosystem experiments across mainland china. Journal of Agro-Environment Science 28, 24642475 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, C. J., Pan, G. X., Tian, Y. G., Li, L. Q., Zhang, X. H. & Han, X. J. (2010). Changes in cropland topsoil organic carbon with different fertilizations under long-term agro-ecosystem experiments across mainland China. Science China: Life Sciences 53, 858867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, G. X. (2004). From the household responsibility to modern farm company for farmland management of China. Northern Economy 2004, 1113 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Chen, Z. J. (2005). The instrumental gap of the household responsibility of farmland managements of China. Modern Science and Technology of Agriculture 11, 91 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wu, H., Miao, Y. H., Jiang, H., Xu, D. & Jiao, W. P. (2008). Improving the circulation market of land contractual management rights for land operation with proper scale-up. China Agricultural Science Bulletin 24, 547550 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Wu, Z., Liu, M. & Davis, J. (2005). Land consolidation and productivity in Chinese household crop production. China Economic Review 16, 2849 (in Chinese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Q., Rui, W. Y., He, H., Wu, F., Luo, H., Bian, X. M. & Zhang, W. J. (2006). Characteristics and regional differences soil organic carbon density in farmland under different land use patterns in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 39, 25052510 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Xu, X. W., Pan, G. X. & Sun, X. L. (2009). Changes in topsoil organic carbon content and the significance in C sequestration of farmlands from Guichi County, Anhui Province, China. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science 28, 25512558 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Yu, H., Huang, J., Scott, R., Brandt, L. & Zhang, L. (2003). Use rights security, land transfer and resource degradation. Economic Research Journal 9, 8291 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, L. X. & Xu, X. M. (1996). Farm household behaviour in production under different policy environment. Journal of Agro-Technological Economy 4, 2732 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Li, L. Q., Pan, G. X., Wang, H. G., Jiang, A. D. & Huang, H. G. (2004). Dynamics of topsoil organic carbon of paddy soils at Yixing over the last 20 years and the driving factors. Quaternary Sciences 24, 236242 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhao, Q. G. (2002). The Red Soil Material Cycling and its Regulation. Beijing: China Science Press (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Song, G. H., Pan, G., Li, L. Q. & Zhang, X. H. (2009 a). Role of chemical protection by binding to oxyhydrates in SOC sequestration in three typical paddy soils under long-term agro-ecosystem experiments from South China. Geoderma 153, 5260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, P., Pan., G. X., Li, L. Q. & Zhang, X. H. (2009 b). SOC enhancement in major types of paddy soils in a long-term agro-ecosystem experiment in South China. V. Relationship between carbon input and soil carbon sequestration. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 42, 42604268.Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Zhang, X. H. & Pan, G. X. (2006). Effects of longterm different fertilizations on total and particular organic carbon and the depth distribution a rice soil from Tai Lake region, Jiangsu, China. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Sciences 12, 765771 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sketch map of Jiangxi Province of China showing the location of the surveyed village in yellow solid circle.

Figure 1

Table 1. Basic soil properties (mean±s.d.) of the topsoil samples (0–150 mm) (n=105)

Figure 2

Table 2. General status of land management and farmland plot size (mean±s.d.) of the 15 households surveyed in Banqiao village

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Observation frequency of size distribution of the 105 plots occupied by the households surveyed.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of topsoil organic C content of the 105 plots occupied by the households surveyed.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Variation of topsoil organic carbon content with land management, land use and fragmentation of the 105 plots surveyed. Different capital letters above the bar indicate significant difference at P<0·05 between types in a same block.

Figure 6

Table 3. Changes in farmland topsoil SOC (g/kg; mean±sd) with number and area of plots affiliated to the 15 surveyed households

Figure 7

Table 4. Topsoil SOC content (mean±s.d.) of plots with different agricultural management practices