No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
PSEUDO-FINITE SETS, PSEUDO-O-MINIMALITY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2020
Abstract
We give an example of two ordered structures $\mathcal {M},\mathcal {N}$ in the same language $\mathcal {L}$ with the same universe, the same order and admitting the same one-variable definable subsets such that $\mathcal {M}$ is a model of the common theory of o-minimal $\mathcal {L}$ -structures and $\mathcal {N}$ admits a definable, closed, bounded, and discrete subset and a definable injective self-mapping of that subset which is not surjective. This answers negatively two question by Schoutens; the first being whether there is an axiomatization of the common theory of o-minimal structures in a given language by conditions on one-variable definable sets alone. The second being whether definable completeness and type completeness imply the pigeonhole principle. It also partially answers a question by Fornasiero asking whether definable completeness of an expansion of a real closed field implies the pigeonhole principle.
MSC classification
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Association for Symbolic Logic 2020
Footnotes
The second affiliation for the author of the article has been corrected. An erratum detailing this change has also been published (doi: 10.1017/jsl.2021.100).
References
A correction has been issued for this article:
Linked content
Please note a has been issued for this article.