Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:55:47.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trends in ultra-processed food availability and its association with diet-related non-communicable disease health indicators in the Portuguese population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Taissa Pereira de Araújo*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto – Rua do Campo Alegre, 823 Porto 4150-180, Portugal Associated Laboratory ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health – Institute of Public Health, University of Porto – Rua das Taipas, 135/139 Porto 4050-600, Portugal
Milena Miranda de Moraes
Affiliation:
Associated Laboratory ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health – Institute of Public Health, University of Porto – Rua das Taipas, 135/139 Porto 4050-600, Portugal
Cláudia Afonso
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto – Rua do Campo Alegre, 823 Porto 4150-180, Portugal Associated Laboratory ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health – Institute of Public Health, University of Porto – Rua das Taipas, 135/139 Porto 4050-600, Portugal
Sara Simões Pereira Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto – Rua do Campo Alegre, 823 Porto 4150-180, Portugal Associated Laboratory ITR, Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health – Institute of Public Health, University of Porto – Rua das Taipas, 135/139 Porto 4050-600, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author: Taissa Pereira de Araújo, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Broad variations in dietary and physical activity patterns are part of nutritional transition concept. An additional nutritional transition has as main characteristic the change of consumption of processed foods for ultra-processed foods (UPF). This study aims to evaluate trends of UPF availability in Portuguese population and its association with diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCD) health indicators. This ecological study used data from the Household Budget Surveys conducted by the National Statistics Institute each 5 years within a national representative sample of households. The percentage of UPF was calculated based on the total daily amount of food and beverages available per capita (in grams). Data from the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 were used, which were retrieved from DAFNE-Anemos Software. NCD age-standardised mortality, prevalence and incidence were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease database, for the years 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015. Between 1990 and 2005, the UPF availability increased from 3·9 % to 13·8 %. Over the years, almost all food and beverages categories increased the UPF availability contribution, mainly noticeable for milk, sugar, cereal and meat products. Positive correlations were observed between UPF availability and digestive diseases both in prevalence (r = 0·062; P = 0·037) and incidence (r = 0·005; P = 0·010) measures. Neoplasms incidence also showed positive correlation with UPF availability (r = 0·002; P = 0·012). Trends in UPF availability in Portugal increased exponentially. At the same time, there is a trend towards a decrease in unprocessed and processed food availability. The Portuguese population should be made aware of the health risks resulting from excessive consumption of UPF.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Non-communicable diseases (NCD), as CVD, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases, are an invisible epidemic and the leading cause of mortality in the world, killing 41 million people each year, equivalent to 71 % of all deaths globally. This epidemic situation hinders the economic development of many countries. Each year, more than 15 million people die from a NCD between the ages of 30 and 69 years; 85 % of these premature deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. CVD account for most NCD deaths, or 17·9 million deaths annually, followed by cancer (9·3 million), respiratory diseases (4·1 million) and diabetes (1·5 million). These four groups of diseases account for over 80 % of all premature NCD deaths(1). Unhealthy diet is one of the modifiable risk factors for the major NCD. Other NCD risk factors, such as overweight/obesity, higher blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol, are also linked to unhealthy diet(1).

Broad changes in dietary and physical activity patterns, obesity trends, and diet-related NCD are part of the concept of nutritional transition defined by Popkins (1993)(Reference Popkin2). An additional nutritional transition stage, so named by Fardet and Rock (2018)(Reference Fardet and Rock3), is mainly characterised by the transition from ‘normally processed’ to ultra-processed foods (UPF).

The nutrition transition in Portugal is marked by a decrease in the adherence to the Mediterranean diet, intangible cultural heritage of humanity(4) and its replacement by a westernised diet characterised by excessive salt, sugar and fat(Reference Rodrigues, Naska and Trichopoulou58).

Recent studies about UPF consumption in Portugal mainly focused on the last national dietary survey (2015–2016) and on specific age groups(Reference Antoniazzi, de Miranda and Rauber9Reference Vedovato, Vilela and Severo13). From these studies, it was evident that UPF consumption is a relevant issue in the Portuguese population. According to Magalhães et al.(Reference Magalhães, Severo and Correia14), UPF accounts for 24 % of total energetic value, which is an average value, when compared with other countries (UK: 54·3 %; Australia: 42 %)(Reference Rauber, Steele and Louzada15,Reference Machado, Steele and Levy16) . However, to our best knowledge, no information on UPF consumption evolution is available, as there are no studies on UPF consumption trends in Portugal.

To date, only two national dietary surveys have been performed in Portugal, a first one in 1980 and another in 2015/16 (IAN-AF)(Reference Lopes, Torres and Oliveira7). Nevertheless, they are not comparable due to the use of different methodologies. The lack of information on individual food consumption studies makes indirect assessment data, namely dietary data from the Household Budget Surveys (HBS), a possible and pertinent way to study time trends in UPF consumption among the Portuguese population. Previous studies showed the effectiveness of using these household food acquisitions data to estimate consumption trends, once HBS are periodically collected and present good correlation with individual food consumption values(Reference Rodrigues, Lopes and Naska1719). However, only two studies have analysed Portuguese HBS data to assess UPF consumption, both using the 2000 database(Reference Monteiro, Moubarac and Levy20,Reference de Araújo, de Moraes and Afonso21) .

A previous systematic review showed that studies on UPF food trends are still scarce and mainly focused on assessing the association with trends of overweight and obesity(Reference de Araújo, de Moraes and Magalhães22). However, HBS data allow to monitor the variations in the share of UPF in diet over time and test how it correlates with the evolution of dietary quality and other epidemiological outcomes.

The aim of this study was to analyse trends of the UPF availability in the Portuguese population and its association with health indicators, such as mortality, prevalence and incidence of NCD.

Methods

Dietary data

This ecological study was based on Portuguese household food availability data, collected by the National Statistics Institute (INE) through the HBS that are performed every 5 years within a national representative sample of households (INE 2017)(19). The Portuguese HBS data used in this study were obtained from the DAFNE-Anemos Software (available free of charge at http://www.hhf-greece.gr/DafnesoftWebV2/) (23). All the existing datasets were used: years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005.

Dietary data retrieved from DAFNE-Anemos Software were available in eleven food categories: cereals and cereal products; meat, meat products and dishes; fish, seafood and dishes; eggs, milk and milk products; potatoes and other starchy roots, pulses and nuts; fruits; vegetables; added lipids; sugar and sugar products; non-alcoholic beverages; alcoholic beverages.

First, these data were classified according to the Nova System(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy24,Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy25) . The classification was carried out by two different researchers, and disagreements were checked by a senior specialist. Foods were classified by the list of ingredients of the products. After this, the per capita total, UPF and percentual UPF household food availability was calculated, both overall and within each of the eleven DAFNE food subgroups. To better account for low or no-calorie foods(Reference Magalhães, Severo and Correia14), quantities (in grams for foods and in millilitres for beverages) rather than calories were used. Procedures were repeated separately for each one of the studied years. The mean total per capita household food availability in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 was, respectively, 1799 g 1659 g, 1620 g and 1518 g.

Classification according to the degree of food processing

Despite the existence of other classification systems, the Nova System (Monteiro et al. 2019)(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy24) was chosen, as it is the most used worldwide(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Lawrence26) and also the most conservative in terms of classification for highly processed foods and UPF(Reference de Araújo, de Moraes and Afonso21,Reference Martinez-Perez, San-Cristobal and Guallar-Castillon27) .

The Nova classification is based on the extent and purpose of the industrial processing applied to foods (Monteiro et al., 2019; Monteiro et al, 2016)(Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy24,Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy25) . This classification categorises foods into four groups. Group 1 includes unprocessed or minimally processed foods, which are those consumed as they were obtained in nature or that underwent industrial process with no addition of any ingredients, only to extend their shelf life or to make their preparation easier, such as drying, boiling, freezing or others. Group 2 includes processed culinary ingredients, such as sugar, oils, fats, salt and other substances extracted from foods or nature, used to cook unprocessed or minimally processed foods and to make meals or snacks. Group 3 includes processed foods, which are industrially manufactured by adding processed culinary ingredients to unprocessed or minimally processed foods, in order to increase their durability. Group 4 includes UPF. This food group is composed by industrial formulations manufactured mostly or entirely from sugar, salt, oils and fats, starches and many substances derived from foods but not normally used to cook, and additives including those used to imitate the sensory qualities of natural foods or to disguise undesirable qualities of the final product.

Health indicators

Trends in UPF availability were associated with dietary-related health indicators which are important causes of disability and premature death in Portugal, namely, neoplasm, diabetes mellitus, CVD, chronic respiratory diseases, digestive diseases and NCD in general. National data on prevalence, incidence and mortality of these diseases were used. Once the time lag between exposure to high UPF consumption and the occurrence of NCD is unknown, the arbitrary, but often applied, 10 years’ period between exposure and outcome was used(Reference Rodrigues, Trichopoulou and de Almeida28,Reference Yang, Kuroishi and Huang29) . The Portuguese health indicators from 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 (the most recent available data considering an interval period of 5 years, as data from year 2020 were not yet available) were retrieved from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) website(30).

Comparing rates between two time periods is usually more representative when considering differences in the age structure of the two populations(Reference Brenner, Arndt and Gefeller31). This is particularly important if the characteristic being observed varies by age, which is the case of NCD prevalence, incidence and mortality rates, that affect considerably more people in their later years of life than those in their younger years. It is only by removing the effect of the differing age distributions that make possible to better analyse the relative over time decreases or increases (https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/dai/btd/asr) (32). Age-standardised health indicators were thus used in this study.

The used mortality rates reflect the probability of dying between 15 and 60 years per 1000 population(33). In this study, the incidence rates are expressed as the number of new cases in a year divided by the mid-year population size(30). The prevalence used is the proportion of people in a population who are a case of a disease, in a specific period of time(30). Overall and cause-specific NCD premature mortality, incidence and prevalence rates were obtained to correlate with UPF availability.

The values for the chosen variables were collected from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study(30). The GBD is the most comprehensive global study that analyses 286 causes of death, 369 diseases and injuries, and 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, including data from Portugal. Led by the IHME, the GBD provides a tool to quantify health loss from diseases, injuries and risk factors. This tool can be used at the global, national and local levels to understand health trends over time. The IHME is an independent global health research centre at the University of Washington, USA, and the data are made available for download by non-commercial users(30).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. To study time trends, Spearman’s correlation coefficients were computed between the age-standardised NCD mortality, prevalence and incidence rates in the years 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015, and UPF availability in years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r) were obtained for the global values of UPF availability with each one of the health indicators included, to assess the association between the availability of UPF and each one of the NCD indicators (dependent variables). Linear regression adjustments were used (R2, coefficient of determination). The coefficient of determination is a statistical measure of how close the data are to the adjusted regression line. P-values were considered statistically significant at the 0·05 level. The statistical analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Statistics version 27.

Results

Time trends in ultra-processed foods

The HBS data indicated an increase trend in UPF availability in the Portuguese population. As shown in Table 1, UPF availability monotonically increased, nearly quadrupling between 1990 and 2005. Conversely, a monotonic decrease in unprocessed/minimally processed and specially processed food availability was observed during the same time period. The availability of processed culinary ingredients remained fairly constant.

Table 1. Trends in food availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

HBS, Household Budget Surveys.

P < 0·001. Percentages calculated from total per capita daily amounts of food and beverages availability (1990–1799 g, 1995–1659 g, 2000–1620 g and 2015–1518 g).

Table 2 presents the percentual contribution of UPF for each food and beverages category total availability. The non-alcoholic beverages category presents the highest percentages of UPF availability. It is observed that the UPF availability of this food category increases until the year 2000 and then shows a decrease in 2005. With the exception of the vegetables and added lipids, all other food categories increased in UPF availability over the years. In 2005, the second food category with highest UPF availability were eggs, milk and milk products, as well as in 2000. In 1995 and 1990, the second food groups with the most UPF availability were added lipids and meat, meat products and dishes. Despite a still low percentage of contribution to the availability of UPF, it is important to highlight the categories of potatoes and other roots rich in starch, pulses and nuts, fish, seafood and dishes, fruits, and alcoholic beverages. There is an exponent increase in the UPF contribution in the categories of potatoes (0·14 % to 3·56 %) and fruits (1·03 % to 8·82 %).

Table 2. Trends in the contribution of UPF for each food and beverages category total availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

UPF, ultra-processed foods; HBS, Household Budget Surveys.

Percentages calculated from each year total per capita daily availability amounts of each food and beverages category and thus not summing 100 %.

Table 3 presents the percentual contribution of each food and beverages category for total UPF availability. It is noticeable that along time the highest contributions remain from the same categories: non-alcoholic beverages, eggs, milk and milk products, meat, meat products and dishes, and cereals and cereal products.

Table 3. Trends in the contribution of each food and beverages category for total UPF availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

UPF, ultra-processed foods; HBS, Household Budget Surveys.

Percentages calculated from total per capita daily amounts of UPF availability (1990–69·43 g, 1995–106·97 g, 2000–165·42 g and 2015–209·25 g).

Trends in non-communicable diseases (mortality, prevalence and incidence)

Figure 1 shows the age-standardised NCD mortality rates trends in Portugal(30). It is observed that over the years, the mortality rate for each of the NCD and NCD in general has steadily decreased until 2015. In contrast, the UPF availability constantly increases, considering a 10-year time lag between exposure (UPF availability) and outcome (NCD mortality).

Fig. 1. NCD mortality rates (probability of dying per 1000 population) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015. NCD, non-communicable diseases.

Regarding to prevalence, NCD in general, diabetes, digestive diseases and neoplasms increased over the years. The prevalence of CVD has been steadily decreasing since 2000 (Fig. 2). Figure 2 shows the prevalence of NCD from the year 2000 to 2015 and compares it with trends in UPF availability in Portugal from the year 1990 to 2005.

Fig. 2. NCD prevalence (age-standardised) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015, and UPF availability increase in Portugal from 1990 to 2005. NCD, non-communicable diseases; UPF, ultra-processed foods.

The incidence of neoplasms and digestive diseases have increased continuously over the years. Diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases incidence maintained almost stable in the period from 2010 to 2015. The incidence of CVD has been decreasing since 2000. Incidence from NCD in general decreased until 2010, but in 2015 increased again (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. NCD incidence (age-standardised) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015. NCD, non-communicable diseases; UPF, ultra-processed foods.

Table 4 summarises the information by presenting the correlations based on NCD in the years 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 and UPF availability in the years 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. A significant positive very weak correlation was observed between UPF availability and digestive diseases, both in the prevalence (r = 0·062; P = 0·037) and the incidence (r = 0·005; P = 0·010). Incidence of neoplasm also showed significant positive very weak correlation with UPF availability (r = 0·002; P = 0·012), while a significant negative correlation with CVD prevalence (r = –0·100; P = 0·005) and incidence (r = –0·002; P = 0·042) was observed. For mortality, all correlations were statistically significant but negative.

Table 4. Correlations between prevalence, incidence and mortality rate of NCD and UPF availability in Portugal

NCD, non-communicable diseases; UPF, ultra-processed foods.

r, Spearman’s correlation coefficient; p, significance; R2, coefficient of determination.

The use of boldface was to highlight values with statistical significance.

Discussion

The first finding of this study was the trend towards increased availability of UPF. In a space time of 15 years, UPF availability has nearly quadrupled in the Portuguese population. In agreement with this, a global study that analysed worldwide trends and patterns in the UPF consumption using per capita market sales data found a substantial expansion in the types and quantities of UPF and beverages available in the world’s food supply. This evidences that a transition towards a more highly processed global diet is quickly underway(Reference Baker, Machado and Santos34). Another trend study evaluating UPF consumption in the USA highlighted the high consumption of UPF in all parts of the US population, demonstrating that intake has continuously increased over the last two decades(Reference Juul, Parekh and Martinez-Steele35).

At the same time that trends in UPF availability increase in Portugal, the availability of unprocessed or minimally processed and processed foods decreases. Similar results were found in a trend study in Canada. Using HBS dietary data, they verified that the most important change in Canadian dietary patterns between 1938 and 2011 was the replacement of unprocessed or minimally processed foods and culinary ingredients used in the preparation of meals by UPF(Reference Moubarac, Batal and Martins36). Another study using HBS data from Argentina observed trends consistent with those of the present study. They found an increase over time in the proportion of energy and critical nutrients coming from UPF, along with a decrease in unprocessed or minimally processed foods, culinary ingredients and processed foods(Reference Zapata, Rovirosa and Carmuega37).

Although the contribution for the total UPF availability remains coming mainly from the same categories (non-alcoholic beverages, eggs, milk and milk products, meat, meat products and dishes, and cereals and cereal products) along time, increased trends in the contribution of UPF within most categories were observed. Analysing each food category separately, there was a strong increasing trend in the availability of UPF within egg and milk products, sugar products, cereal products, and meat products. Following these same trends, a recent study using individual dietary intake data from Portuguese population (IAN-AF 2015/16) verified that the most common consumption from UPF among adults were yogurts and milk-based drinks, sausage and other reconstituted meat products, industrial cakes and desserts and industrial breads and toasts. These products added to packaged sweet snacks and soft drinks and sugar-sweetened beverages accounted for approximately 70 % of dietary energy originated from UPF in Portuguese adults and old people(Reference Costa de Miranda, Rauber and de Moraes11). Another study, using Portuguese individual dietary data, associated factors with UPF consumption and showed yogurts were the main source of UPF in individuals of higher education levels. In the lower level of education, cold meats and sausages and soft drinks were highlighted(Reference Magalhães, Severo and Correia14).

The so-called double burden of disease, the growth of NCD simultaneously with the increase in malnutrition due to micronutrient deficiencies, is often associated with nutrition transition, a change from the local traditional diet towards a higher availability of UPF(Reference Batal, Steinhouse and Delisle38). This study uses NCD mortality, incidence and prevalence data available from GBD to analyse the correlation between UPF availability and health outcomes. The findings reported an increasing trend in the prevalence of NCD in general, and in the prevalence and incidence of diseases such as cancer, digestive diseases, and diabetes, accompanying trends in UPF availability. On the other hand, this study shows mortality from CVD, and all NCD have decreased over time(39,Reference Townsend, Kazakiewicz and Lucy Wright40) . The decrease trend in mortality from CVD is shown in a recent WHO report, from 2000 to 2019. In the same period, deaths from diabetes increased slightly(41).

Several studies have investigated the association between the consumption of UPF and health status(Reference Pagliai, Dinu and Madarena42). A cohort study of 44 551 French adults verified that a 10 % increase in the proportion of UPF consumption was significantly associated with a 14 % higher risk of all-cause mortality(Reference Schnabel, Kesse-Guyot and Allès43). A study of Spanish workers concluded that those who consumed the highest amount of UPF were twice as likely to have coronary atherosclerosis, regardless of blood lipids, hypertension, BMI and other cardiovascular risk factor(Reference Montero-Salazar, Donat-Vargas and Moreno-Franco44). Another study found a positive association between globally increasing per capita volume sales of UPF and adult BMI trajectories(Reference Vandevijvere, Jaacks and Monteiro45).

In the present study, negative correlations were found between the increase in the availability of UPF and mortality from all NCD, as well as for the prevalence and incidence of CVD. A prospective study with a representative sample of US adults observed no association with CVD mortality(Reference Kim, Hu and Rebholz46). Despite the studies tending towards a similar result, this is an ecological study in which inferences should not be made at the individual level(Reference Munnangi and Boktor47).

Furthermore, the negative impact of UPF is not only associated with NCD but has recently been associated on diet water footprint(Reference Garzillo, Poli and Leite48). Dietary patterns worldwide are becoming potentially harmful to human and planetary health. A recent time-series study using data from Brazilian HBS verified that the environmental effects of the Brazilian diet have increased over the past three decades along with increased effects from UPF(Reference da Silva, Garzillo and Rauber49). Once ‘Food is the single strongest lever to optimise human health and environmental sustainability on Earth’, it is also of utmost relevance to emphasise that the reduction of highly processed foods is among the measures pointed out to promote sustainable food systems(Reference Willett, Rockström and Loken50).

The limitations and strengths of the present study should be considered.

Because the data available in DAFNE-Anemos Software only include information from 1990 to 2005, and the INE does not allow the use of detailed food and beverages information, the most recent HBS surveys (2010, 2015 and 2020) could not be used, and thus only four points in time were included in this study. However, even if included, the most recent data would not be possible to analyse with NCD outcomes, once so much recent data are not yet available and the 10 years’ time interval used was not possible to achieve. In addition, as being an indirect measure, HBS captures only food acquired for consumption at home but not food consumption itself, which might underestimate or overestimate food consumption. Despite of that, in Portugal, HBS are the only periodically collected data that would allow for over time dietary monitoring. Not accounting for other factors, such as household income or health expenditures, for example, that might influence health indicators and thus the association with UPF availability, is also another limitation. As an ecological study, results have to be cautiously interpreted due to the possibility of ecological fallacy. For this reason, associations identified at group level data should not be assumed to be true for individuals(Reference Munnangi and Boktor47,Reference Buckley, Day and Lear51,Reference Piantadosi, Byar and Green52) . Even tough, results have the capacity to highlight for the relevance of the subject and might pose hypothesis for further analysis.

The correlations do not account for potential confounding, and this may be a limitation of the study. Despite this, the results showed the alarm trends in UPF availability in Portugal.

Yet, it should be noted that the dietary information used was data collected by INE and national representative. As far as we know, this is the first study on trends in UPF consumption in the Portuguese population. Few studies compared UPF trends with NCD, and even fewer performed the analysis of UPF trends in food and beverages categories(Reference de Araújo, de Moraes and Magalhães22). Finally, although UPF trends in Portugal are still low compared with other countries(Reference Rauber, Steele and Louzada15,Reference Machado, Steele and Levy16) , the trend over the years is worrying, which emphasises the need for monitoring diet quality and should be taken into account by health educators and policymakers(Reference Vandevijvere, Monteiro and Krebs-Smith53,54) .

Conclusions

Trends in UPF availability in Portugal grow exponentially. At the same time, there is a trend towards a decrease in unprocessed and home-prepared foods. The trends in prevalence and incidence from neoplasms and digestive diseases, although presenting very week correlations, followed trends in UPF availability.

To monitor diet quality, and UPF in particular, is of utmost relevance in Portugal. Public policies should consider this fact and promote action in order to mitigate the increase in the availability and consumption of UPF and to alert the population about the harm to health arising from its excessive consumption.

Acknowledgements

The study did not receive any funding.

Conceptualisation of the study: T. P. A., C.A. and S. S. P. R.; methodology: T. P. A., C. A. and S. R.; validation: T. P. A., M. M., C. A. and S. R.; formal analysis: T. P. A., M. M. and S. R.; investigation: T. P. A.; data curation: T. P. A. and S. R.; writing – original draft preparation: T. P. A.; writing – review and editing: M. M., C. A. and S. R.; visualisation: T. P. A., M. M., C. A. and S. R.; supervision: C. A. and S. R.; project administration: S. R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

World Health Organization (2022) Noncommunicable Diseases. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (accessed March 2023)Google Scholar
Popkin, BM (1993) Nutritional, patterns and transitions. Popul Dev Rev 19, 138157. doi: 10.2307/2938388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fardet, A & Rock, E (2018) Perspective: reductionist nutrition research has meaning only within the framework of holistic and ethical thinking. Adv Nutr 9, 655670. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy044 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNESCO (2013) Eighth Session of the Intergovernmental Committee (8.COM) 2–7 December 2013. https://ich.unesco.org/en/decisions/8.COM/8.10 (accessed December 2022).Google Scholar
Rodrigues, SSP, Naska, A, Trichopoulou, A, et al. (2007) Availability of foods and beverages in nationally representative samples of Portuguese households from 1990 to 2000: the DAFNE initiative. J Public Health 15, 211220. doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0092-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministério da Saúde (2018) Retrato da Saúde (Health Portrait). Portugal: Ministério da Saúde.Google Scholar
Lopes, C, Torres, D, Oliveira, A, et al. (2018) National Food, Nutrition, and Physical Activity Survey of the Portuguese General Population, IAN-AF 2015–2016: Summary of Results, 2018. Porto: University of Porto. www.ian-af.up.pt Google Scholar
Direção-Geral da Saúde (2017) Direção de Serviços de Informação e Análise. A Saúde dos Portugueses 2016 (The Health of the Portuguese 2016). Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde.Google Scholar
Antoniazzi, L, de Miranda, RC, Rauber, F, et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption deteriorates the profile of micronutrients consumed by Portuguese adults and elderly: the UPPER project. Eur J Nutr 62, 11311141. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-03057-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araújo, CRB, Ribeiro, KDDS, Oliveira, AF, et al. (2021) Degree of processing and nutritional value of children’s food products. Public Health Nutr 24, 59775984. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa de Miranda, R, Rauber, F, de Moraes, MM, et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and non-communicable disease-related nutrient profile in Portuguese adults and elderly (2015–2016): the UPPER project. Br J Nutr 125, 11771187. doi: 10.1017/S000711452000344X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Moraes, MM, Oliveira, B, Afonso, C, et al. (2021) Dietary patterns in Portuguese children and adolescent population: the UPPER project. Nutrients 13, 3851. doi: 10.3390/nu13113851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vedovato, GM, Vilela, S, Severo, M, et al. (2021) Ultra-processed food consumption, appetitive traits and BMI in children: a prospective study. Br J Nutr 125, 14271436. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magalhães, V, Severo, M, Correia, D, et al. (2021) Associated factors to the consumption of ultra-processed foods and its relation with dietary sources in Portugal. J Nutr Sci 10, e89. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauber, F, Steele, EM, Louzada, MLDC, et al. (2020) Ultra-processed food consumption and indicators of obesity in the United Kingdom population (2008–2016). PLoS One 15, e0232676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, PP, Steele, EM, Levy, RB, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods and recommended intake levels of nutrients linked to non-communicable diseases in Australia: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 28, e029544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, SSP, Lopes, C, Naska, A, et al. (2007) Comparison of national food supply, household food availability and individual food consumption data in Portugal. J Public Health 15, 447455. doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0102-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trichopoulou, A, Naska, A & DAFNE III Group (2003) European food availability databank based on household budget surveys: the data food networking initiative. Eur J Public Health 13, 2428. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/13.suppl_1.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2017) Inquérito às despesas das famílias 2015–2016 (Household Expenditure Survey 2015–2016). Lisboa, Portugal: INE.Google Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Moubarac, JC, Levy, RB, et al. (2018) Household availability of ultra-processed foods and obesity in nineteen European countries. Public Health Nutr 21, 1826. doi: 10.1017/s1368980017001379 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Araújo, TP, de Moraes, MM, Afonso, C, et al. (2022) Food processing: comparison of different food classification systems. Nutrients 14, 729. doi: 10.3390/nu14040729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Araújo, TP, de Moraes, MM, Magalhães, V, et al. (2021) Ultra-processed food availability and noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18, 7382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DAFNE-ANEMOS Soft (2019) The Pan-European Food Data Bank Based on Household Budget Surveys. http://www.hhf-greece.gr/DafnesoftWebV2/ (accessed December 2022).Google Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, RB, et al. (2019) Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr 22, 936941. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, RB, et al. (2016) NOVA A estrela brilha. Classificação dos alimentos. Saúde Pública (NOVA The star shines. Food classification. Public health). World Nutr 7, 2840.Google Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Lawrence, M, et al. (2019) Ultra-Processed Foods, Diet Quality, and Health Using the NOVA Classification System. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Martinez-Perez, C, San-Cristobal, R, Guallar-Castillon, P, et al. (2021) Use of different food classification systems to assess the association between ultra-processed food consumption and cardiometabolic health in an elderly population with metabolic syndrome (PREDIMED-Plus Cohort). Nutrients 13, 2471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, SSP, Trichopoulou, A & de Almeida, MDV (2008) Household diet-quality in relation to mortality in Portuguese regions: an ecological study. J Public Health 16, 7576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0143-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, CX, Kuroishi, T, Huang, XE, et al. (2002) Correlation between food consumption and colorectal cancer: an ecological analysis in Japan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 3, 7783.Google ScholarPubMed
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation – IHME (2023) 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/ Google Scholar
Brenner, H, Arndt, V, Gefeller, O, et al. (2004) An alternative approach to age adjustment of cancer survival rates. Eur J Cancer 40, 23172322. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Canada’s The Daily (2023) Age-Standardized Rates. https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/dai/btd/asr (accessed January 2023).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2022) The Global Health Observatory. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/indicator-groups/indicator-group-details/GHO/adult-mortality (accessed December 2022).Google Scholar
Baker, P, Machado, P, Santos, T, et al. (2020) Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev 21, e13126. doi: 10.1111/obr.13126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juul, F, Parekh, N, Martinez-Steele, E, et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018. Am J Clin Nutr 115, 211221. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moubarac, JC, Batal, M, Martins, APB, et al. (2014) Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can J Dietetic Pract Res 75, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3148/75.1.2014.15 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zapata, ME, Rovirosa, A & Carmuega, E (2022) Consumo de energía y nutrientes críticos según clasificación NOVA en la Argentina, tendencia temporal y diferencias según nivel de ingreso (Intake of energy and critical nutrients according to the NOVA classification in Argentina, time trend and differences according to income). Cad Saude Publica 38, e00252021. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XES252021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batal, M, Steinhouse, L & Delisle, H (2018) The nutrition transition and the double burden of malnutrition. Med Sante Trop 28, 345350. doi: 10.1684/mst.2018.0831.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2022) European Regional Obesity Report 2022. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Townsend, N, Kazakiewicz, D, Lucy Wright, F, et al. (2022) Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Nat Rev Cardiol 19, 133143. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00607-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2022) World Health Statistics 2022: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Pagliai, G, Dinu, M, Madarena, MP, et al. (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125, 308318. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520002688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnabel, L, Kesse-Guyot, E, Allès, B, et al. (2019) Association between ultraprocessed food consumption and risk of mortality among middle-aged adults in France. JAMA Intern Med 179, 490498. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero-Salazar, H, Donat-Vargas, C, Moreno-Franco, B, et al. (2020) High consumption of ultra-processed food may double the risk of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: the Aragon Workers’ Health Study (AWHS). BMC Med 18, 235. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01678-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandevijvere, S, Jaacks, LM, Monteiro, CA, et al. (2019) Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories. Obes Rev 20, 1019. doi: 10.1111/obr.12860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H, Hu, EA & Rebholz, CM (2019) Ultra-processed food intake and mortality in the USA: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994). Public Health Nutr 22, 17771785. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munnangi, S & Boktor, SW (2022) Epidemiology Of Study Design. StatPearls (Internet). Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing.Google Scholar
Garzillo, JMF, Poli, VFS, Leite, FHM, et al. (2022) Ultra-processed food intake and diet carbon and water footprints: a national study in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 56, 6. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
da Silva, JT, Garzillo, JMF, Rauber, F, et al. (2021) Greenhouse gas emissions, water footprint, and ecological footprint of food purchases according to their degree of processing in Brazilian metropolitan areas: a time-series study from 1987 to 2018. Lancet Planet Health 5, e775e785. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00254-0. Erratum in: Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Dec;5(12):e861. PMID: 34774121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, W, Rockström, J, Loken, B, et al. (2019) Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, HL, Day, NJ, Lear, G, et al. (2021) Changes in the analysis of temporal community dynamics data: a 29-year literature review. PeerJ 9, e11250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, S, Byar, DP & Green, SB (1988) The ecological fallacy. Am J Epidemiol 127, 893904. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandevijvere, S, Monteiro, C, Krebs-Smith, SM, et al. (2013) Monitoring and benchmarking population diet quality globally: a step-wise approach. Obes Rev 14, 135149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Guidelines on the Collection of Information on Food Processing through Food Consumption Surveys. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Trends in food availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

Figure 1

Table 2. Trends in the contribution of UPF for each food and beverages category total availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

Figure 2

Table 3. Trends in the contribution of each food and beverages category for total UPF availability in Portugal, using HBS data (23) and Nova Classification System (24)

Figure 3

Fig. 1. NCD mortality rates (probability of dying per 1000 population) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015. NCD, non-communicable diseases.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. NCD prevalence (age-standardised) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015, and UPF availability increase in Portugal from 1990 to 2005. NCD, non-communicable diseases; UPF, ultra-processed foods.

Figure 5

Fig. 3. NCD incidence (age-standardised) in Portugal, from 2000 to 2015. NCD, non-communicable diseases; UPF, ultra-processed foods.

Figure 6

Table 4. Correlations between prevalence, incidence and mortality rate of NCD and UPF availability in Portugal