Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:30:19.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the glycaemic index of carbohydrates relevant to enhanced performance in young athletes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

M. Westlake
Affiliation:
School of Science, Technology and Health, University Campus Suffolk, Ipswich, UK
M. Hawkins
Affiliation:
School of Science, Technology and Health, University Campus Suffolk, Ipswich, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Nutritional guidance for the adolescent athlete engaged in demanding training schedules is mostly based on adult recommendations(Reference Aucouturier, Baker and Duche1). The young athlete's ultimate aim is to maintain levels of carbohydrate required by the body during prolonged intensive training as this is a key factor in performance and exercise capacity. Although paediatric exercise science literature is revealing increasing differentiations in exercise physiology between the child and adult athlete, there remains little child-specific evidence regarding the regulatory mechanisms of carbohydrates during exercise(Reference Burke, Collier and Hargreaves2). The aim of this study was to examine whether carbohydrate (CHO) of different glycaemic index (GI) would enhance performance in adolescent swimmers when used as the carbohydrate supplementation indicator in a pre-exercise meal. Eleven adolescent swimmers (mean (sd) age: 12.9 (sd 1.24) completed two trials, separated by 14 d, in a random crossover design. Each consumed a low GI (pasta) or high GI (potato) evening meal (2.5 g CHO/kg body mass) 90 min prior to initial exercise followed by 50 m and 400 m front crawl time trials. Dietary intake was also controlled from lunchtime onwards on each trial day.

No statistically significant differences were observed in performance times in the low GI trial v. high GI trial in either 50 m [mean (sd) low v. high GI 50 m: 32.87 (sd 1.92) v. 32.83 (sd 1.26) or 400 m (mean (sd) low v. high GI 400 m: 327.11 (sd 14.55) v. 323.95 (sd 15.0)] (P>0.05). The results of this study indicate that there was no significant improvement in either sprint or endurance performance times, despite a greater dependence on CHO with this mode of exercise, following CHO supplementation of different GI. Due to ethical limitations, it was not possible to obtain blood samples or expired gas samples from the adolescent subjects, at any point during this study. This would have enabled the measurement and observation of certain metabolic responses and subsequent substrate utilisation to the high GI and low GI meals, and their influences in relation to exercise performance. The unique fuel-use profile and blood-lactate concentration of a child athlete during submaximal exercise has mostly been attributed to their increased oxidative and decreased glycolytic ability compared with adults. However, this view has recently been challenged by some eminent researchers(Reference Timmons, Bar-Or and Riddell3). It is clear that further research is required to investigate any potential performance benefits to the adolescent athlete, using the GI as the CHO supplementation indicator in a pre-exercise meal.

References

1.Aucouturier, J, Baker, J & Duche, P (2008) Sports Med 38, 213238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Burke, L, Collier, G & Hargreaves, M (1998) Int J Sports Nutr 8, 401415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Timmons, B, Bar-Or, O & Riddell, M (2007b) J Appl Phys 103, 9951000.Google Scholar