Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T04:36:56.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonology from the Inside Out: Constructed Language as a Pedagogical Tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Sara Sowers-Wills
Sara Sowers-Wills*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, United States
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reflects on a project-based curriculum employing constructed languages to teach linguistics, with a focus on phonology. In a special topics linguistics course, nine students were led through the construction of a language. While students in introductory linguistics courses sometimes struggle with phonology, active engagement with a semester-long language construction project endowed these students with the practical motivation to understand (1) what phonology is, (2) how phonological rules work, and (3) why rules surface in the first place. They readily captured generalizations based on natural classes of sounds, recognizing the systematicity of their constructed phonology. Student performance and engagement in this course support the use of constructed languages as a pedagogical tool in linguistics. Because an ongoing project builds in problem-solving opportunities and processual thinking, highlighting relationships among key concepts, students achieve a more comprehensive understanding of core areas in the broader linguistic picture.

Résumé

Résumé

Cet article se penche sur un programme d’études basé sur des projets employant des langues construites pour enseigner la linguistique, en particulier la phonologie. Dans le cadre d'un cours spécial de linguistique, neuf étudiants ont été guidés dans la construction d'une langue. Alors que les étudiants des cours d'introduction à la linguistique éprouvent parfois des difficultés avec la phonologie, leur engagement actif dans un projet de construction linguistique tout au long d'un semestre a donné à ces étudiants une motivation pratique pour comprendre (1) ce qu'est la phonologie, (2) comment fonctionnent les règles phonologiques et (3) pourquoi les règles émergent-elles de toute façon. Ils ont facilement saisi des généralisations basées sur des classes naturelles de sons, reconnaissant le caractère systématique de leur phonologie construite. Le rendement et l'engagement des étudiants dans ce cours étayent la pertinence d'employer des langues construites comme outil pédagogique en linguistique. Comme les projets continus intègrent des possibilités de résolution de problèmes et une réflexion procédurale, mettant en évidence les relations entre les concepts clés, les étudiants parviennent à une compréhension plus complète des domaines essentiels de la linguistique plus généralement.

Keywords

constructed languagephonologyproject-based learningactive learningpedagogylangues construitesphonologiepédagogie de projetapprentissage actifenseignement
Type
Thematic Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 2024 , pp. 307 - 332
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Skye J., Bischoff, Shannon T., Punske, Jeffrey, and Fountain, Amy V.. 2020. Learning about language through language invention. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 208–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthurs, Leilani A., and Kreager, Bailey Zo. 2017. An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings. International Journal of Science Education 39(15): 2073–2091. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1363925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, James A. 2020. Teaching invented languages as an introductory course. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 125–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., Soloway, Elliot, Marx, Ronald W., Krajcik, Joseph S., Guzdial, Mark, and Palincsar, Annemarie. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist 26(3–4): 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brame, Cynthia J. 2016. Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/active-learning/.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Angela C. 2020. Teaching invented languages to the undergraduate major: A capstone course. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 107–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S., and Haspelmath, Martin, eds. 2013. WALS Online (v2020.3). https://wals.info/Google Scholar
Felder, Richard M., and Brent, Rebecca. 2009. Active learning: An introduction. American Society for Quality Higher Education Brief 2(4): 1–5.Google Scholar
Gillon, Carrie, Delmonico, Edward, Martinez, Randi, and Morrell, Spencer. 2020. Bringing language construction from the classroom to the community. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 137–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, Grant. 2020. The design(ing) of language. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 69–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helle, Laura, Tynjälä, Päivi, and Olkinuora, Erkki. 2006. Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education 51(2): 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Index Diachronica. 2016. https://chridd.nfshost.com/diachronica/index-diachronica.pdfGoogle Scholar
Johnson, David W. and Johnson, Roger T. 2018. Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In Active learning: Beyond the future, ed. Brito, Sílvio Manuel. London: IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086Google Scholar
Kokotsaki, Dimitra, Menzies, Victoria, and Wiggins, Andy. 2016. Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools 19(3): 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajcik, Joseph S., and Blumenfeld, Phyllis C.. 2005. Project-based learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, ed. Keith Sawyer, R., 317–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Doug, Shipley, Thomas F., Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team. 2021. The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 22(1): 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejzlik, Petr. 2018. Awkwords. https://github.com/nai888/awkwordsGoogle Scholar
Okrent, Arika. 2010. In the land of invented languages: Adventures in linguistic creativity, madness, and genius. New York: Spiegel & Grau.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matt. 2020. Using language invention to teach typology and cross-linguistic universals. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 86–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David J. 2015. The art of language invention: From horse-lords to dark elves to sand worms, the words behind world-building. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., eds. 2020. Language invention in linguistics pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfelder, Mark. 2010. The language construction kit. Chicago: Yonagu Books.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Mark. 2012. Gen. https://www.zompist.com/gen.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Nathan. 2016. Constructed languages in the classroom. Language 92(3): e192–e204. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Nathan and Schreyer, Christine. 2020. The interdisciplinarity of conlangs: Moving beyond linguistics. In Language invention in linguistics pedagogy, ed. Punske, Jeffrey, Sanders, Nathan, and Fountain, Amy V., 169–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0011CrossRefGoogle Scholar