Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:31:56.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Riemann–Roch for stacky matrix factorizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2022

Dongwook Choa
Affiliation:
Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02455, Republic of Korea; E-mail: [email protected]
Bumsig Kim
Affiliation:
Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02455, Republic of Korea
Bhamidi Sreedhar
Affiliation:
Center for Geometry and Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea; current address: Harish-Chandra Research Institute, A CI of Homi Bhabha National Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Prayagraj, 211019, India E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We establish a Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch-type theorem and a Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch-type theorem for matrix factorizations on quotient Deligne–Mumford stacks. For this, we first construct a Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg-type isomorphism explicit enough to yield a categorical Chern character formula. Then, we find an expression of the canonical pairing of Shklyarov under the isomorphism.

Type
Algebra
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

1 Introduction

1.1 Main results

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. The main interest of this paper is a Landau–Ginzburg model, $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ , where ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a smooth separated Deligne–Mumford stack of finite type over k and a regular function w with no other critical values but zero.

By a matrix factorization for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ we mean a pair $(P, \delta _P)$ of a locally free coherent ${\mathbb G}$ -graded sheaf P on ${\mathcal {X}}$ and a curved differential $\delta _P$ whose square is $w\cdot \mathrm {id}_P$ . Here, ${\mathbb G}$ can be either the group ${\mathbb Z}$ or ${\mathbb Z}/2$ depending on w. There is the notion of the coderived category of matrix factorizations $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and its differential graded (dg) enhancement defined as the dg quotient of the dg category of matrix factorizations by the subcategory of coacyclic or equivalently locally contractible matrix factorizations. Later, we will introduce a Čech-type dg enhancement of $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ denoted by $\mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ which we are going to use throughout the paper; see [Reference Efimov and Positselski15, Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob34] and also Definition 4.8.

The goal of this text is to firstly prove a Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg (HKR) for the category of matrix factorizations. The HKR theorem allows us to prove a Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch (HRR) theorem and a Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch(GRR) theorem under the HKR-type map. In the rest of this section, we give an outline of the results, proofs and relations to previous works.

1.1.1 HKR and a Chern character formula

To the dg category $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ , one can associate a Hochschild chain complex

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{MC}(\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w)).\end{align*}$$

which is a mixed complex equipped with the bar differential with Conne’s B operator. It has been expected that $\mathrm {MC}(\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ should be quasi-isomorphic to the $dw$ -twisted de Rham mixed complex $(\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw |_{I{\mathcal {X}}} , d)$ of the inertia stack $I{\mathcal {X}}$ of ${\mathcal {X}}$ . However, only particular cases have been proven so far. In this paper, we verify that the expectation is indeed true.

We first introduce some notations. Let P be a matrix factorizations and $\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}} : I{\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {X}}$ be the natural morphism. Write $P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ and $w|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ for $\rho ^* _{{\mathcal {X}}} P$ and $\rho ^*_{{\mathcal {X}}}w$ respectively. Let

$$\begin{align*}\mathfrak{can} _{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \in {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{MF}_{dg}(I{\mathcal{X}}, w|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}(P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})\end{align*}$$

be the canonical automorphism of $P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ ; see § 3. Next, let

$$\begin{align*}\hat{\mathrm{at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \in {\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes \Omega ^{-dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) \end{align*}$$

denote the Atiyah class of the matrix factorization $P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ for $(I{\mathcal {X}}, w|_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ ; see [Reference Favero and Kim16, Reference Kim and Polishchuk24, Reference Kim and Polishchuk25] and § 5.2. Finally, ${\mathrm {tr}}$ denotes the supertrace morphism

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}}: {\mathbb R} {\mathrm{Hom}} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )) \to {\mathbb H} ^*(I{\mathcal{X}}, ( \Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )). \end{align*}$$

Theorem 1.1. Suppose ${\mathcal {X}}$ is smooth and has the resolution property. Then there is an isomorphism

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{MC} (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w)) \cong {\mathbb R}\Gamma (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} , d) \end{align*}$$

in the derived category of mixed complexes. Under the isomorphism, the Hochschild homology valued Chern character $\mathrm {ch} _{HH} (P)$ is representable by

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}} \big( \mathfrak{can} _{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \exp ( \hat{\mathrm{at}} (P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )) \big) \end{align*}$$

in ${\mathbb H} ^* ( I{\mathcal {X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}} ) )$ after the appropriate sense of the exponential operation $\exp $ is taken into account; see § 5.2.

The history of related works is very rich. Here, we mention only the case of stacky matrix factorizations. In the local case Theorem 1.1 was proved by Polishchuk and Vaintrob [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob35]. There are works of Căldărau, Tu and Segal [Reference Căldăraru and Tu8, Reference Segal40] for HKR-type isomorphisms in affine cases with a finite group action. The paper [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3] of Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov show an HKR-type isomorphism for the graded cases on linear spaces. This result has also been obtained by Halpern–Leistner and Pomerleano [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano18, Remark 3.20] and [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano17, Corollary 4.6]. We note that there is a difference in the map constructed in the current text and [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano17] (see equation (4.5) and Remark 4.15). Theorem 1.1 is proven by Kuerak Chung, Taejung Kim and the second author in [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10], when one considers quotient stacks of the form $[X/G]$ , where X is a smooth variety with a finite group action. In [Reference Kim and Polishchuk25], an HKR-type isomorphism and Chern character formula including the case for the graded matrix factorizations are obtained by the universal Atiyah class.

1.1.2 HRR and GRR

Further, assume that the smooth separated Deligne-Mumford stack ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a stack quotient of a smooth variety by an action of an affine algebraic group and the critical locus of w is proper over k. When ${\mathbb G} = {\mathbb Z}/2$ , we shall further assume that the morphism $w: {\mathcal {X}} \to \mathbb {A}^1_k$ is flat. We call the pair $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ a proper Landau-Ginzburg (LG) model. We define the Euler characteristic $\chi (P, Q)$ of the pair $(P, Q)$ by the alternating sum of the dimensions of higher sheaf cohomology:

$$\begin{align*}\chi (P, Q) := \sum _{i \in {\mathbb G}} (-1)^i \dim {\mathbb R} ^i {\mathrm{Hom}} (P, Q). \end{align*}$$

For a vector bundle E on $I{\mathcal {X}}$ , let $\mathrm {at} (E)\in {\mathrm {Ext}} ^1 (E, E \otimes \Omega ^1_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ denote the usual Atiyah class of E. Let

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch} _{tw} (E) := {\mathrm{tr}} (\mathfrak{can} _E \exp (\mathrm{at} (E)) \in {\mathbb H} ^* ( I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, 0 ) ). \end{align*}$$

For a virtual vector bundle E, define $\mathrm {ch}_{tw}(E)$ by linearity. We define the Todd class $\mathrm {td} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ of $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ by the formulation of Todd class in terms of the Chern character $\mathrm {ch} _{tw} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ ; see § 5.2.

Theorem 1.2. Let $P^{\vee }$ denote the matrix factorization $(P^{\vee }, \delta _P ^{\vee })$ for $({\mathcal {X}}, -w)$ dual to $(P, \delta _P)$ , let $ N_{I{\mathcal {X}} / {\mathcal {X}}}$ denote the normal bundle of $I{\mathcal {X}}$ to ${\mathcal {X}}$ via $\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}}$ , let $\dim _{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ be the locally constant function for local dimensions of $I{\mathcal {X}}$ and let $\lambda _{-1} ( N_{I{\mathcal {X}}/{\mathcal {X}}}^{\vee })$ be the alternating sum of exterior powers of $N_{I{\mathcal {X}}/{\mathcal {X}}}^{\vee }$ . Then

(1.1) $$ \begin{align} \chi (P, Q) = \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \mathrm{ch} _{HH} (Q) \wedge \mathrm{ch} _{HH} (P ^{\vee}) \wedge \frac{\mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\lambda _{-1} ( N^{\vee}_{I{\mathcal{X}} / {\mathcal{X}}}))}. \end{align} $$

Here, the right-hand side is the composition of the following operations:

$$ \begin{align*} & -\wedge -: {\mathbb H} ^{*} (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}, dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )) \otimes {\mathbb H} ^{*} (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )) \to {\mathbb H}^{*}_{Z}(I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}, 0)); \\ &-\wedge \frac{\mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\lambda _{-1} ( N^{\vee}_{I{\mathcal{X}} / {\mathcal{X}}}))} : {\mathbb H}^{*}_{Z}(I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}, 0)) \to {\mathbb H}^{*}_{Z}(I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}, 0)); \\ & \int_{I{\mathcal{X}}} : \ \oplus _{p\in {\mathbb Z}} H^{*} _c(I{\mathcal{X}}, \Omega ^p _{I{\mathcal{X}}}[p]) \xrightarrow{projection} H^0_c (I{\mathcal{X}}, \Omega ^n _{I{\mathcal{X}}} [n]) \xrightarrow{{\mathrm{tr}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}} k , \end{align*} $$

where Z denotes the critical locus of $w|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ which is proper, and $H^*_c$ denotes compactly supported cohomology.

Let $({\mathcal {Y}}, v)$ be another proper LG model. Consider a proper morphism $f: {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ with $f^* v = w$ . Let $K_0 ({\mathcal {A}})$ be the Grothendieck group of the homotopy category of a pretriangulated dg category ${\mathcal {A}}$ , and let $f_! : K_0 (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w) ) \to K_0 (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {Y}} , v) ) $ be the pushforward induced by f; see [Reference Ciocan-Fontanine, Favero, Guéré, Kim and Shoemaker9, § 2]. Let $\widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{If}) : = \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}} }) / If^* \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{I{\mathcal {Y}}})$ , where

$$\begin{align*}\widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) = \frac{\mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\lambda _{-1} ( N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/{\mathcal{X}}}^{\vee}))} .\end{align*}$$

Let $\dim _{If}$ be the function on $I{\mathcal {X}}$ for relative local dimensions of $If : I{\mathcal {X}} \to I{\mathcal {Y}}$ , and let

$$\begin{align*}\int _{If} : {\mathbb H} ^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} , - dw)) \to {\mathbb H} ^* (I{\mathcal{Y}} , (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{Y}}} , - dv)) \end{align*}$$

be the pushforward; see § 7.0.1.

Theorem 1.3 (=Theorem 6.10)

The following diagram is commutative:

When ${\mathbb G} = {\mathbb Z}$ (and hence $w=0$ ), various versions of Riemann–Roch theorems on DM stacks are proven by Kawasaki [Reference Kawasaki20], Toën [Reference Toën43] and Edidin and Graham [Reference Edidin and Graham11, Reference Edidin and Graham12, Reference Edidin and Graham13]. In the context of Hochschild homology of schemes (and $w=0$ ), Theorem 1.3 was proved by Ramadoss [Reference Ramadoss38]. When w has one critical point, Theorem 1.2 is proven by Polishchuk and Vaintrob [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob35].

1.2 On the proofs and pertinent works

1.2.1 HKR

For the computation of Hochschild homology of the category of matrix factorizations, there are at least three known approaches by (1) finding a suitable flat resolution of the diagonal module [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3, Reference Lin and Pomerleano27, Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob35], (2) using the quasi-Morita equivalence [Reference Brown and Walker5, Reference Căldăraru and Tu8, Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10, Reference Efimov14, Reference Segal40] and (3) using the universal Atiyah classes [Reference Kim and Polishchuk24, Reference Kim and Polishchuk25] which goes back to [Reference Căldăraru and Mukai pairing7, Reference Markarian31]. In this paper, we take the second approach by constructing a globalization of Baranovsky’s map [Reference Baranovsky4] closely following the proof of Proposition 2.13 of [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano18] and [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano17, Corollary 4.6]. Combining this with a chain-level map from [Reference Brown and Walker5, Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10], we obtain a boundary-bulk map formula as well as a Chern character formula; see § 5.

1.2.2 HRR

For any proper smooth dg category ${\mathcal {A}}$ , there is a categorical HRR theorem by Shklyarov [Reference Shklyarov41]. Let ${\mathcal {A}} ^{op}$ denote the opposite category of ${\mathcal {A}}$ . Let $\langle , \rangle _{can}$ be the canonical pairing (or the Mukai pairing in [Reference Căldăraru and Mukai pairing7]):

$$\begin{align*}\langle , \rangle _{can} : HH_* ({\mathcal{A}}) \otimes HH_* ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op}) \to k. \end{align*}$$

Then the categorical HRR theorem is the equality

$$\begin{align*}\chi (P, Q) = \langle \mathrm{Ch}_{HH} (Q), \mathrm{Ch}_{HH} (P^{\vee}) \rangle _{can} \ \forall P, Q \in {\mathcal{A}}.\end{align*}$$

There is a characteristic property of the canonical pairing in terms of the Chern character of diagonal bimodule; see, for example, § 6.1.2. Let ${\mathcal {A}}$ be the dg category of matrix factorizations for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ localized by coacyclic matrix factorizations. When ${\mathcal {X}}$ is local, using the characteristic property Polishchuk and Vaintrob [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob35] show that the canonical pairing becomes up to sign the residue pairing under their HKR type isomorphism. In the nonstacky local case, there is also a work of Brown and Walker [Reference Brown and Walker6] identifying the canonical pairing with the residue pairing under the HKR type isomorphism.

When ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a smooth variety, using the deformation to the normal cone as well as the characteristic property of the canonical pairing, the second author [Reference Kim23] shows that the canonical pairing becomes a trace map under the HKR-type isomorphism up to a Todd correction term. When ${\mathcal {X}}$ is stacky, furthermore using the deformation to the normal cone for local immersions [Reference Kresch26, Reference Vistoli45] and the Chern character formula in Theorem 1.1, we are able to prove Theorem 1.2.

1.2.3 GRR

The proper morphism f in Theorem 1.3 induces a dg functor from $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ to $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {Y}} , v)$ . The induced homomorphism

$$\begin{align*}HH_* (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w)) \to HH_* (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{Y}} , v)) \end{align*}$$

in Hochschild homology has a description § 6.1.1 in terms of the canonical pairing of $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}} , - w \otimes 1 + 1 \otimes v)$ and the categorical Chern character of the matrix factorization associated to the graph morphism $\Gamma _f : {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}$ .

Under the HKR isomorphisms, the deformation to the normal cone allows us to interpret the description as the pushforward by f on $ {\mathbb H} ^{0} (I{\mathcal {X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ up to a Todd correction term.

1.3 Conventions and notations

Let the ground field k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Let $\mu _r$ denote the group of r-th roots of unity over the field k. Throughout this paper, let ${\mathcal {X}}$ be a finite type separated DM stack over k. We denote by $I{\mathcal {X}}$ the inertia stack of ${\mathcal {X}}$ . Let

$$\begin{align*}\rho _{{\mathcal{X}}} : I{\mathcal{X}} \to {\mathcal{X}} \end{align*}$$

denote the natural representable morphism, which is finite and unramified [Reference Abramovich, Graber and Vistoli1, § 3]. For a group G, $\widehat {G}$ shall denote its character group $\mathrm {Hom}(G, \mathbb {G}_m)$ . Let G be a finite group which acts on a scheme Y of finite type over k. For a quotient stack $[Y/G]$ , let

$$\begin{align*}IY := \{ (g, y) \in G \times Y : gy = y \} := G\times Y \times _{Y\times Y} \Delta _Y \end{align*}$$

so that $I[Y/G] = [IY/G]$ .

For a local immersion (i.e., an unramified representable morphism) $f: {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ between DM stacks, we denote $C_{{\mathcal {X}} / {\mathcal {Y}}}$ be the normal cone to ${\mathcal {X}}$ in ${\mathcal {Y}}$ ; see [Reference Kresch26, Reference Vistoli45]. If f is a regular local immersion, then we write $N_f$ or $N_{{\mathcal {X}}/ {\mathcal {Y}}}$ for the vector bundle $C_{{\mathcal {X}} / {\mathcal {Y}}}$ on ${\mathcal {X}}$ .

For a vector bundle E, we often write $1_E$ for the identity morphism $\mathrm {id}_E$ of E. For a dg category ${\mathcal {A}}$ , its homotopy category is denoted by $[{\mathcal {A}}]$ .

The label $\sim $ on an arrow indicates the arrow is a quasi-isomorphism.

2 Mixed Hochschild complexes and Chern characters

Unless otherwise stated, we follow notation and conventions of [Reference Brown and Walker5, Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10] for curved dg (in short CDG) categories ${\mathcal {A}}$ , the mixed Hochschild complexes of ${\mathcal {A}}$ and the category of mixed complexes. We briefly recall the notations therein and some foundational facts which we are going to use later.

2.1 Mixed Hochschild complexes

For a CDG category ${\mathcal {A}}$ , we use the following notation:

  • $C ({\mathcal {A}}) \ (\mathrm {MC} ({\mathcal {A}}))$ : (mixed) Hochschild complex.

  • $\overline {C} ({\mathcal {A}})\ (\overline {\mathrm {MC}} ({\mathcal {A}}))$ : (mixed) normalized Hochschild complex.

  • $C ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}}) \ (\mathrm {MC}^{II} ({\mathcal {A}}))$ : (mixed) Hochschild complex of the second kind.

  • $\overline {C} ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}})\ (\overline {\mathrm {MC}}^{II} ({\mathcal {A}}))$ : (mixed) normalized Hochschild complex of the second kind.

For notational convenience, we let $C'$ denote either $C, \overline {C}, C^{II}$ or $\overline {C} ^{II}$ and $\mathrm {MC} ' $ denote either $\mathrm {MC}, \overline {\mathrm {MC}}$ , $\mathrm {MC} ^{II}$ , or $\overline {\mathrm {MC}} ^{II}$ . The normalized negative cyclic complex is denoted by $\overline {C} ({\mathcal {A}}) [[u]]$ , where u is a formal variable of degree $2$ . For a mixed complex $(C, b, B)$ , we simply write $C[[u]]$ for the complex $(C [[u]], b + uB)$ .

2.2 Foundational facts frequently in use

2.2.1 Invariance under the natural projections

The projection $\mathrm {MC} (\mathcal {D}) \to \overline {\mathrm {MC}} (\mathcal {D}) $ for a dg category $\mathcal {D}$ and the projection $\mathrm {MC} ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}}) \to \overline {\mathrm {MC}} ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}} )$ for a CDG category ${\mathcal {A}}$ are quasi-isomorphisms [Reference Brown and Walker5, Reference Polishchuk and Positselski36].

2.2.2 (Quasi-)Morita invariance

If a dg functor $\mathcal {D} \to \mathcal {D}'$ is Mortia-equivalent (i.e., the induced functor $D(\mathcal {D}) \to D (\mathcal {D}')$ of derived categories of $\mathcal {D}$ and $\mathcal {D}'$ is an equivalence), then the induced morphism $\mathrm {MC} (\mathcal {D} ) \to \mathrm {MC} (\mathcal {D} ')$ of mixed complexes is a quasi-isomorphism [Reference Keller21]. If ${\mathcal {A}} \to {\mathcal {A}}'$ is a pseudo-equivalence of CDG categories, then the induced morphism $\overline {\mathrm {MC}} ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}}) \to \overline {\mathrm {MC}} ^{II} ({\mathcal {A}} ')$ is a quasi-isomorphism [Reference Polishchuk and Positselski36]. This invariance is dubbed as quasi-Morita invariance.

2.2.3 Localization in cyclic homology

If ${\mathcal {A}} \to \mathcal {B} \to {\mathcal {C}}$ be an exact sequence of exact dg categories, then it induces an exact triangle of mixed complexes

$$\begin{align*}MC ({\mathcal{A}}) \to \mathrm{MC} (\mathcal{B}) \to \mathrm{MC} ({\mathcal{C}}) \to \mathrm{MC} ({\mathcal{A}} ) [1]; \end{align*}$$

see [Reference Keller22, § 5.6].

2.2.4 Local description of the inertia stack

Let G be a finite group acting on a k-scheme X, and let $G/G$ denote the set of conjugacy classes of G. Then the following holds $I[X/G] \cong \sqcup _{g \in G/G} [X^g /\mathrm {C} _{G}(g) ] $ .

2.2.5 Invariants and coinvariants

Let G be a group with a linear action upon V a not-necessarily finite-dimensional vector space. Define the invariant space $V^G:={\mathrm {Hom}} _G (k, V)$ and the coinvariant space $V_G := k \otimes _G V$ . If G is a finite group, then the composition of the natural homomorphisms $V^G \to V \to V_G $ is an isomorphism.

2.3 Categorical Chern characters

For $P \in {\mathcal {A}}$ , the cycle class represented by the identity morphism $1_P$ in the normalized Hochschild complex $\overline {C} ({\mathcal {A}})$ (resp. the normalized negative cyclic complex $\overline {C} ({\mathcal {A}}) [[u ]]$ ) of ${\mathcal {A}}$ is denoted by $\mathrm {Ch} _{HH} (P)$ (resp. $\mathrm {Ch} _{HN}(P)$ ).

3 The canonical central automorphism

3.1 The central embedding

The inertia stack has a decomposition:

$$\begin{align*}I{\mathcal{X}} = \sqcup _{r=1}^{\infty} I _{\mu_r} {\mathcal{X}}. \end{align*}$$

An object of $I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}$ over a k-scheme T is a pair $(\xi , {\alpha })$ of an object $\xi \in {\mathcal {X}} (T)$ and an injective morphism of group-schemes ${\alpha } : \mu _r \times T \to {{\mathcal {A}} ut} _T (\xi )$ ; see [Reference Abramovich, Graber and Vistoli1, § 3]. Note that, for all but finitely many r, $I_{\mu _r} {\mathcal {X}}$ is empty. An automorphism of the pair $(\xi , {\alpha })$ in $I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}$ is by definition an automorphism $f \in {{\mathcal {A}} ut}_T (\xi )$ such that

$$\begin{align*}f \circ {\alpha} \circ f^{-1} = {\alpha}. \end{align*}$$

In other words, the automorphism group-scheme ${{\mathcal {A}} ut}_T (\xi , {\alpha } )$ of $(\xi , {\alpha })$ over T is the centralizer of ${\alpha }$ in ${{\mathcal {A}} ut}_T (\xi )$ . We have a canonical central embedding $\mathfrak {c}: \mu _r \times T \to {{\mathcal {A}} ut}_T(\xi , {\alpha })$ . This gives a natural morphism

$$ \begin{align*} \mu _r \times T \to T\times _{I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}} T; (\xi, t) \mapsto (t, t, \mathfrak{c} (\xi , t)). \end{align*} $$

3.2 The central automorphism

Let $T \to I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}$ be an étale surjection, and let $pr _i : T\times _{I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}} T \to T$ be the i-th projection. A vector bundle E on $I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}$ amounts to a vector bundle F on T with an isomorphism $\phi ^F \in \mathrm {Isom}_T (pr _1^* F , pr_2^* F)$ satisfying the cocycle condition. By pulling back the isomorphism $\phi ^F$ to $\mu _r \times T$ , we obtain a morphism of group-schemes $\mu _r\times T \to \mathrm {Aut}_{T} (F)$ . Here, $\mathrm {Aut}_{T} (F)$ denotes the group of automorphisms of F fixing T. Since $\mathfrak {c}$ is central, the homomorphism descends to a homomorphism $\mu _r \to \mathrm {Aut}_{I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}} (E)$ . Denote by

$$\begin{align*}\mathfrak{can} _E \in \mathrm{Aut}_{I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}} (E) \end{align*}$$

the image of the chosen r-th root $e^{2\pi i/r}$ of unity.

According to the action $\mu _r$ upon E, the bundle E is decomposable into eigenbundles

$$\begin{align*}\bigoplus _{\chi \in \widehat{\mu _r}} E_{\chi} ,\end{align*}$$

where $\widehat {\mu _r}$ is the character group of $\mu _r$ . Then we have

$$\begin{align*}\mathfrak{can} _E = \bigoplus_{\chi \in \widehat{\mu _r} } \chi (e^{2\pi i /r } ) \mathrm{id}_{E_{\chi}} \in {\mathrm{Hom}} _{I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}} (E, E) .\end{align*}$$

3.3 The local description

Locally the central automorphisms $\mathfrak {can}$ can be described as follows. Suppose that ${\mathcal {X}} = [X/G]$ , where G is a finite group and X is a scheme. Let $g\in G$ with order r, and write $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ for the centralizer of g in G. For the component $[X^g / \mathrm {C} _{G}(g) ]$ of $I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}$ and a $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ -equivariant sheaf E on $X^g$ , we have an isomorphism

$$\begin{align*}(g^{-1})^* E \xrightarrow{\varphi _g^E} E \end{align*}$$

from the equivariant structure of E. Since g acts trivially on $X^g$ , $(g^{-1})^* E = E$ . And hence, $\varphi _g^E $ is an automorphism of E, which is the automorphism $\mathfrak {can} _E$ . Since any element of $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ commutes with g, the homomorphism $\varphi ^E_g$ is $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ -equivariant. Thus, $\varphi _g^E \in \mathrm {Hom}_{I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}} (E, E)$ . For any $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ -equivariant sheaf $E'$ on $X^g$ and any $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ -equivariant ${\mathcal {O}}_{X^g}$ -module homomorphism $a: E\to E'$ , note that $\varphi _g^{E'} \circ a = a \circ \varphi _g^E $ .

3.4 $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}} \cong IT_{{\mathcal {X}}}$

In this subsection, let ${\mathcal {X}}$ be smooth over k. We prove that there is a natural isomorphism $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}} \cong IT_{{\mathcal {X}}}$ .

Consider a commuting diagram of natural morphisms

where the square is a fiber square.

Lemma 3.1. The morphism $\phi $ induces an isomorphism $IT_{{\mathcal {X}}} \cong T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ .

Proof. First, note that it is enough to check the isomorphism over the étale site of the coarse moduli space of ${\mathcal {X}}$ . Since ${\mathcal {X}}$ is separated, then ${\mathcal {X}}$ is étale locally a quotient of a nonsingular variety Y by a finite group G action. Hence, we may assume that ${\mathcal {X}} = [Y/G]$ . Since

$$\begin{align*}T_{[Y/G]} \cong [T_Y / G] \text{ and } I[Y/G] \cong \bigsqcup _{g\in G/G} [Y^g / \mathrm{C} _{G}(g) ], \end{align*}$$

we have

$$\begin{align*}IT_{[Y/G]} \cong \bigsqcup _{g \in G/G} [ (T_Y)^g / \mathrm{C} _{G}(g) ] \text{ and } T_{I[Y/G]} \cong \bigsqcup _{g\in G/G} [T_{Y^g} /\mathrm{C} _{G}(g) ]. \end{align*}$$

Since $(T_Y)^g \cong T_{Y^g}$ , we conclude the proof.

Note first that there is a natural short exact sequence of vector bundles

$$\begin{align*}0 \to T_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \to \rho ^* _{{\mathcal{X}}} T_{{\mathcal{X}}} \to N_{\rho_{{\mathcal{X}}}} \to 0. \end{align*}$$

In fact, this sequence splits. The reason is that according to the canonical automorphism of $\rho ^* _{{\mathcal {X}}} T_{{\mathcal {X}}}$ there is a decomposition of $\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}} ^* T_{{\mathcal {X}}} $ into the fixed part and the moving part, which are naturally isomorphic to $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}} $ and $N_{\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}}}$ , respectively. $N_{\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}}}$ is in particular a vector bundle. For a detailed discussion on local embeddings, see [Reference Vistoli45, §1.20]).

Remark 3.2. When ${\mathcal {X}}$ is the global quotient $[Y/G]$ by a finite group G, $N_{\rho _{{\mathcal {X}}}} \cong [N_{Y^g/ Y} / \mathrm {C} _{G}(g) ]$ .

4 Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg for stacky matrix factorizations

We introduce the main object of this paper.

Definition 4.1. A LG model is a pair $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ of a smooth separated DM stack ${\mathcal {X}}$ over k and a regular function w on ${\mathcal {X}}$ . We further assume that ${\mathcal {X}}$ satisfies the resolution property. We assume that the critical value is over $0$ . If ${\mathbb G} = {\mathbb Z}$ , then $w=0$ . If ${\mathbb G} = {\mathbb Z}/2$ , then we furthermore assume that $w: {\mathcal {X}} \to \mathbb {A}^1$ is flat. The pair $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ will be called a proper LG model if the critical locus of w is proper over k.

Remark 4.2. We note that if ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a smooth quotient stack which satisfies the resolution property, it follows from [Reference Totaro44, Theorem 1.1] that ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a quotient stack.

4.1 Matrix factorizations and their derived categories

Whenever an LG model $({\mathcal {X}} , w)$ is given, we consider a sheaf of curved differential graded (CDG for short) algebra $({\mathcal {O}}_{{\mathcal {X}}} , -w)$ over ${\mathcal {X}}$ . It is concentrated in degree $0$ with zero differential and a curvature $-w$ .

Definition 4.3. A quasi-differential graded module (QDG-module for short) over $({\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}} , -w)$ is a pair $(P, \delta _P)$ of an ${\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}}$ -module P and an ${\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}}$ -linear degree $1$ endomorphism $\delta _P$ . We say a QDG module is

  • (quasi-)coherent if P is (quasi-)coherent,

  • locally free if P is locally free,

  • matrix quasi-factorization if P is locally free of finite rank.

We denote the category of QDG modules over $({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathcal {X}}, -w)$ by $q\mathrm {Mod}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . It is a CDG category whose morphisms and differentials are

$$ \begin{align*} {\mathrm{Hom}}_{q\mathrm{Mod}}&((P,\delta_P), (Q, \delta_Q))=\left( {\mathrm{Hom}}_{{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathcal{X}}}(P, Q) , \delta \right),\\ \delta(f)&= \delta _Q \circ f - (-1)^{|f|} f \circ \delta _P. \end{align*} $$

The curvature element $h_{(p, \delta _P)}$ of $(P, \delta _P)$ is defined as $\delta _P^2+\rho _{-w} \in \mathrm {End}(P)$ , where $\rho _{-w}$ is the multiplication map by $-w$ .

Definition 4.4. A QDG-module $(P, \delta _P)$ is called a factorization if its curvature is zero. We define (quasi-)coherent or locally free factorizations as in 4.3. In particular, we call it a matrix factorization if P is locally free of finite rank.

By definition, factorizations form a dg subcategory inside $q\mathrm {Mod}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ denoted by $\mathrm {Mod}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . We denote a full dg subcategory of (quasi-) coherent and matrix factorizations by $\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ , $\mathrm {Coh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and $\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ , respectively.

We recall constructions of the derived category of factorizations following [Reference Positselski37]. Let $[\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)]$ be the homotopy category of $\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . Denote by $\mathrm {AbsAcyc}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ the smallest triangulated subcategory containing the totalizations of all short exact sequences in $Z^0\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . Its object is called absolutely acyclic factorizations. Also, denote by $\mathrm {CoAcyc}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ the smallest triangulated subcategory containing the totalizations of all acyclic factorizations which is closed under infinite direct sum; its object are called a coacyclic factorizations.

Definition 4.5. The absolute derived category of $\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is the Verdier quotient

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{abs}}(\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)):=[\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)]/\mathrm{AbsAcyc}({\mathcal{X}}, w).\end{align*}$$

The coderived category of $\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is the Verdier quotient

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{co}}(\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)):=[\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)]/\mathrm{CoAcyc}({\mathcal{X}}, w). \end{align*}$$

We define an absolute/coderived category of $\mathrm {Coh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and $\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Definition 4.6. The derived category of of matrix factorizations denoted by $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is the smallest full triangulated subcategory of $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {co}}(\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ which contains $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {abs}}(\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ .

Remark 4.7. Relations between various categories are well known. We only recall a few facts we will be going to use later. If ${\mathcal {X}}$ is smooth, then it is known that Verdier localization $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {abs}}(\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)) \to \mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {co}}(\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ is an equivalence, and an image of $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {abs}}(\mathrm {Coh}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ consists of compact generators inside $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {co}}(\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ (see [Reference Positselski37, § 3.6]). If ${\mathcal {X}}$ has the resolution property, then $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {abs}}(\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)) \to \mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {abs}}(\mathrm {Coh}({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ is an equivalence. (See [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob34].)

4.2 Čech model

In this subsection, we recall the Čech type dg enhancement of $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}(X, w)$ as in [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10].

Fix an affine étale surjective morphism $\mathfrak {p} : \mathfrak {U} \to {\mathcal {X}}$ from a k-scheme $\mathfrak {U}$ . Let $\mathfrak {U} ^r$ denote the r-th fold product of $\mathfrak {U}$ over ${\mathcal {X}}$ , and let $\mathfrak {p}_r : \mathfrak {U} ^r \to {\mathcal {X}}$ denote the projection. For a vector bundle E on ${\mathcal {X}}$ , let $\check{\text{C}}^{r} (E)= \mathfrak {p}_{r*} \mathfrak {p}_{r}^{*} E$ and

$$\begin{align*}\check{\text{C}} (E) := \left( \bigoplus _{r \ge 1} \check{\text{C}} ^r (E), d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} \right) = \left[ 0 \to p_{1*}p_1^*E \to p_{2*}p_2^*E \to \cdots \right]\end{align*}$$

a Čech complex.

Now, let $(E, \delta _E)$ be a matrix quasi-factorization over $({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathcal {X}}, -w)$ . Observe that $\check{\text{C}}({\mathcal {O}}_{{\mathcal {X}}})$ can be viewed as a sheaf of ${\mathcal {O}}_{\mathcal {X}}$ -algebras equipped with an Alexander–Whitney product. By projection formula $ \check{\text{C}}(E) = E \otimes _{{\mathcal {O}}_{{\mathcal {X}}}}\check{\text{C}}({\mathcal {O}}_{{\mathcal {X}}})$ and $\check{\text{C}}(E)$ carries a natural $\check{\text{C}}({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathcal {X}})$ -module structure. We equip $\check{\text{C}} (E)$ with a curved differential

$$\begin{align*}\delta _{\check{\text{C}}(E)}:= \delta _P \otimes 1 + 1\otimes d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}}. \end{align*}$$

We regard $(\check{\text{C}}(E), \delta _{\check{\text{C}}(E)})$ as a QDG-module over $(\check{\text{C}}({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathcal {X}}), w)$ . Notice that the curvature of $(\check{\text{C}} (E), \delta _{\check{\text{C}}(E})$ coincides with the curvature of E under the canonical map $\mathrm {End} _{{\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}}} (E) \to \mathrm {End} _{\check{\text{C}} ({\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}})} (\check{\text{C}} (E))$ .

Definition 4.8. For a fixed affine étale open cover $\mathfrak {U}$ , a Čech model CDG category $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is a CDG category whose objects are matrix quasi-factorizations and its ${\mathbb G}$ -graded Hom spaces are defined as usual

(4.1) $$ \begin{align} {\mathrm{Hom}}_{q\mathrm{MF}_{dg}}(P, Q)&:=\left( {\mathrm{Hom}}_{{\mathcal{O}}_{{\mathcal{X}}}}(\check{\text{C}}(P), \check{\text{C}}(Q)) , \delta \right) \end{align} $$
(4.2) $$ \begin{align} \delta &= \delta _{\check{\text{C}} (P')} \circ f - (-1)^{|f|} f \circ \delta _{\check{\text{C}}(P)}. \end{align} $$

Similarly, we define a Čech model dg category $ \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w) $ of matrix factorizations for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ as a full dg subcategory of $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w) $ consisting of matrix factorizations for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . When it is necessary to specify the covering $\mathfrak {U}$ , we write $ \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w; \mathfrak {U}) $ for $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

In the following lemma, we show that $\mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is equivalent to the dg-quotient dg enhancement of $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Lemma 4.9. The natural functor

$$ \begin{align*}\epsilon: [\mathrm{MF}_{dg}({\mathcal{X}}, w)] \to \mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{co}}(\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w))\end{align*} $$
$$ \begin{align*}\hspace{0.2cm} P\mapsto \check{\text{C}}(P)\end{align*} $$

is fully faithful, and its essential image is equal to $\mathrm {DMF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Proof. To show that the essential image of $\epsilon $ is as claimed, one can check $\mathrm {Cone}(P \to \check{\text{C}}(P))$ is coacylic so that P is isomorphic to $\check{\text{C}}(P)$ in $\mathrm {DMF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ (see [Reference Ciocan-Fontanine, Favero, Guéré, Kim and Shoemaker9, equation 2.1]).

To prove fully faithfulness, we need to show ${\mathrm {Hom}}_{\mathrm {QCoh}({\mathcal {X}}, w)}(\check{\text{C}}(P), \check{\text{C}}(Q)) \simeq {\mathrm {Hom}}_{\mathrm {DMF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)}(\check{\text{C}}(P), \check{\text{C}}(Q))$ . Using Cech filtration on the second argument, it is enough to show that

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)}(\check{\text{C}}(P),j_*j^*Q) \simeq {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{co}}\mathrm{QCoh}({\mathcal{X}}, w)}(\check{\text{C}}(P), j_*j^*Q)\end{align*}$$

for any open étale affine open $j:V \to {\mathcal {X}}$ . Consider the following diagram:

(4.3)

The right vertical $p_2$ is an isomorphism because $P \to \check{\text{C}}(P)$ is an isomoprhism in $\mathrm {D}^{\mathrm {co}}\mathrm {QCoh}$ . The bottom horizontal q becomes

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{MF}(V, w\vert_V)}(j^*P,j^*Q) \to {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{co}}\mathrm{QCoh}(V, w\vert_V)}(j^*P,j^*Q).\end{align*}$$

This is known to be an isomorphism for all affine V. To show that the left vertical $p_1$ is an isomorphism, it is enough to show that

$$\begin{align*}\left( {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{QCoh}(V)}(\check{\text{C}}^{\bullet} (j^* P^m), j^*Q^n), \delta_{Cech} \right) \to {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathrm{QCoh}(V)}(j^* P^m, j^*Q^n) \end{align*}$$

for all $m, n \in \mathbb Z/2.$ This is nothing but an (unordered) Cech resolution of ${\mathrm {Hom}}_{\mathrm {QCoh}(V)}(j^* P^m, j^*Q^n)$ associated to the open cover $\mathfrak {U} \times _{\mathcal {X}} V$ on V, which is an isomorphism because V is affine. The claim follows.

Lemma 4.9 is an analogue of the Čech enhancement of [Reference Lunts and Schnürer30, § 4.1] for Deligne–Mumford stacks. It follows from the proof of the lemma that the dg-quotient enhancement and the Čech model dg-enhancement of Definition 4.8 coincide (see [Reference Lunts and Orlov29, § 2]).

Remark 4.10. We view ${\mathrm {Hom}}_{\mathrm {MF}_{dg}}(P, Q)$ as a $\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/2$ -graded bicomplex. This complex is not bounded above in $\mathbb Z$ -direction because a Čech cover $\mathfrak {U}$ of a stack is genuinely unordered. One can go around the subtleties by taking a suitable truncation. Suppose $(E, \delta _E)$ is a matrix factorization. Define

$$\begin{align*}\tau\check{\text{C}}(E) := \tau _{ \le \dim {\mathcal{X}}} \left( \bigoplus _{r \ge 1} \check{\text{C}} ^r (E), d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} \right),\end{align*}$$

where $\tau _{r \le \dim {\mathcal {X}}}$ denotes the truncation. Note that under the assumptions in this text all stacks have finite cohomological dimension, hence the truncated one does compute the sheaf cohomology of the quasi-coherent sheaf E since the map to the coarse moduli ${\mathcal {X}} \to \underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ is cohomologically affine. Therefore, the induced map between the spectral sequences associated to Čech filtrations

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Hom}}(\check{\text{C}}(P), \check{\text{C}}(Q)) \to {\mathrm{Hom}}(\tau \check{\text{C}}(P), \check{\text{C}}(Q)) \leftarrow {\mathrm{Hom}}(\tau\check{\text{C}}(P), \tau\check{\text{C}}(Q))\end{align*}$$

are isomorphisms on the first page and, hence, are quasi-isomorphisms themselves. Also, notice that $\tau \check{\text{C}}(E) \to \check{\text{C}}(E)$ is a quasi-isomorphism in $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Remark 4.11. In literature, $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is defined as a dg-quotient of $\mathrm {DCoh}$ by locally contractible; see [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob34] or [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano18]. Here, P is called locally contractible if there is an open covering $\mathfrak {V}$ in smooth topology of ${\mathcal {X}}$ such that $P|_{\mathfrak {V}}$ is contractible. We note that

  1. 1. P is coacyclic if and only if $P|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ is coacyclic since the natural morphism $P \to \check{\text{C}} (P)$ is termwise exact. See [Reference Ciocan-Fontanine, Favero, Guéré, Kim and Shoemaker9, Proposition 2.2.6].

  2. 2. TFAE: $P|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ is coacyclic, $P|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ is absolutely acyclic and $P|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ is contractible by [Reference Positselski37, § 3.6];

  3. 3. TFAE: $P|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ is coacyclic, P is locally contractible by [Reference Ciocan-Fontanine, Favero, Guéré, Kim and Shoemaker9, Proposition 2.2.6] and (1).

Therefore, if $P \in \mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ represents a coacyclic object in $\mathrm {D}\mathrm {MF}({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ if and only if P is locally contractible.

Remark 4.12. Consider another affine covering $\mathfrak {U}' \to {\mathcal {X}}$ . Let $\mathfrak {U} " = \mathfrak {U} ' \times _{{\mathcal {X}}} \mathfrak {U}$ . Then there is a natural dg functor $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w, \mathfrak {U}') \to \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w, \mathfrak {U} ")$ , which is a quasi-equivalence. The induced chain map $\mathrm {MC} ' (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w, \mathfrak {U})) \to \mathrm {MC} '( \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w, \mathfrak {U} "))$ between mixed complexes are quasi-isomorphism. For the mixed complex of the first kind, it follows from Morita invariance. For that of either kind, consider the Hochschild complex $C ' (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ filtered by Čech degree. Since the filtration is bounded (see 4.10), we may apply the Eilenberg–Moore comparison theorem ([Reference Weibel46, Theorem 5.5.11]) to check that the induced chain map is a quasi-isomorphism. A similar argument shows that the natural chain map

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{MC} ' (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w, \mathfrak{U})) \to \mathrm{MC} '( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w, \mathfrak{U} ")) \end{align*}$$

is also a quasi-isomorphism.

4.3 Twisting

For a morphism from a scheme U to ${\mathcal {X}}$ , write $IU$ for the fiber product $U \times _{{\mathcal {X}}} I{\mathcal {X}}$ . Following Toën, Halpern–Leistner and Pomerleano [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano18], we consider the assignments

$$\begin{align*}U \mapsto C ' ( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (IU, w|_{IU}, \mathfrak{U} \times _{{\mathcal{X}}} IU )) \end{align*}$$

for all étale morphisms $U\to {\mathcal {X}}$ . They form a presheaf of mixed complexes on the small étale site ${\mathcal {X}}$ , which we denote by

$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{MC} ' (q\mathrm{MF}_{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-)). \end{align*} $$

Denote the associated cochain complex by $C ' (q\mathrm {MF}_{I{\mathcal {X}}, w} (-))$ . There is a natural morphism of mixed complexes

$$\begin{align*}nat: \mathrm{MC} ' (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal{X}}, w)) \to (\Gamma ({\mathcal{X}}, \mathrm{MC} ' (q\mathrm{MF}_{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-))), \end{align*}$$

where the Čech model $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ uses the affine cover $\mathfrak {U} \times _{{\mathcal {X}}} I{\mathcal {X}} \to I{\mathcal {X}}$ .

In Section 3.2, we defined a canonical twist for every coherent sheaf on $I{\mathcal {X}}$ . In turn, this gives an automorphism $\mathfrak {can} _P$ of P for every object P of $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . It is a morphism in the category $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Note that

(4.4) $$ \begin{align} \mathfrak{can} _{P'} \circ a = a \circ \mathfrak{can} _{P} \quad \forall a \in {\mathrm{Hom}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}}(P, P'). \end{align} $$

Hence, the assignments $P\mapsto \mathfrak {can} _P$ yield a natural transformation $\mathfrak {can}$ between the identity functor $\mathrm {id} : \mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w) \to \mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . We will often drop the subscript P in $\mathfrak {can} _P$ for simplicity.

Define a k-linear map $\mathfrak {tw}: C ' (q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w)) \to C ' (q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w))$ associated to $\mathfrak {can}$ by

$$\begin{align*}a_0 [a_1 | \cdots | a_n ] \mapsto a_0 [ a_1 | \cdots | \mathfrak{can} \circ a_n ]. \end{align*}$$

Note that by equation (4.4) $b \circ \mathfrak {tw} = \mathfrak {tw} \circ b$ , that is, $\mathfrak {tw}$ is a chain automorphism of the Hochschild complex $C' (q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w))$ .

Consider the composition $\tau ' $ of a sequence of chain maps

(4.5) $$ \begin{align} C' (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w)) \xrightarrow{pullback} C' &(q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal{X}}, w)) \nonumber \\ &\qquad \xrightarrow{\mathfrak{tw}} C' (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal{X}}, w)) \xrightarrow{nat} \Gamma ({\mathcal{X}}, C' (q\mathrm{MF}_{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-) )). \end{align} $$

Proposition 4.13. The chain map $ \overline {\tau } ^{II}$ is a quasi-isomorphism when ${\mathcal {X}}$ is of form $[{\mathrm {Spec}} A / G]$ for some commutative k-algebra A with a finite group G action.

A proof of the above proposition will be given § 4.4 and § 4.5. For simplicity, we will often write $\tau $ for $\tau '$ when there is no risk of confusion.

4.4 Local case

Let ${\mathcal {X}} = [{\mathrm {Spec}} A / G]$ , and let $w \in A^G$ a G-invariant element of A as in Proposition 4.13. Let $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^G (A, w)$ denote the dg category of G-equivariant factorizations P for $(A, w)$ which are projective as A-modules. The Hom space from P to Q is the G-invariant part of ${\mathrm {Hom}} _A (P, Q)$ of ${\mathbb G}$ -graded A-module homomorphisms. Likewise, we have the CDG category $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^G (A, w)$ of G-equivariant quasi-modules for $(A, w)$ which are projective as A-modules. In fact, these coincide with the Čech models $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ with respect to the natural choice of an affine cover: ${\mathrm {Spec}} A \to {\mathcal {X}}$ .

Let $I_g$ be the ideal of A generated by $a - g a $ for all $a \in A$ . Denote $A_g := A / I_g$ and $w_g := w |_{A_g} \in A_g$ . We regard the pair $(A, w)$ (resp. $(A_g, w_g)$ ) as a CDG algebra A (resp. $A_g$ ) with zero differential and curvature w (resp. $w_g$ ).

The algebra A has the induced left G-action. Note that for $a, b \in A$ and $g, h \in G$ ,

$$\begin{align*}g (a \ h (b)) = g (a) \ gh (b) .\end{align*}$$

The cross product algebra $A\rtimes G := A \otimes k[G]$ has the multiplication defined by $(a\otimes g) \cdot (b \otimes h) = a g (b) \otimes g h$ . We also view $A\rtimes G$ as a right A-module with a left G-action by

$$\begin{align*}(a \otimes g ) \cdot b = a g (b) \otimes g \text{ and } h\cdot (a \otimes g) = a \otimes g h^{-1}. \end{align*}$$

Equivalently, $A\rtimes G$ is a right $A \rtimes G$ -module by the multiplication

$$\begin{align*}(a \otimes g) \cdot (b \otimes h') = a g(b) \otimes g h'. \end{align*}$$

Note that the curvature of $A\rtimes G$ with zero differential as a right quasi-module over $(A \rtimes G, w \otimes 1)$ is $-w\otimes 1$ .

Denote by $\{ (A\rtimes G, -w\otimes 1) \}$ the full subcategory of $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (A\rtimes G, w\otimes 1)$ consisting of the indicated object $A\rtimes G$ with zero differential and curvature $-w\otimes 1$ . The embedding $\{ (A\rtimes G, -w) \} \hookrightarrow q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (A\rtimes G, w\otimes 1) $ is called a quasi-Yoneda embedding. It is a pseudo-equivalence; see [Reference Polishchuk and Positselski36]. Consider the embedding $ q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (A\rtimes G, w\otimes 1) \hookrightarrow q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^G (A, w)$ , which is also a pseudo-equivalence; see [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10]. Hence, by the quasi-Morita invariance the induced morphism of mixed complexes

$$\begin{align*}\overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (A\rtimes G, -w) \to \overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} ( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^G (A, w) ) \end{align*}$$

is a quasi-isomorphism.

Consider an embedding $ \{ (A_g \rtimes G, -w_g \otimes 1)\} \hookrightarrow q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (A_g, w_g)$ . This is a pseudo-equivalence since $(A_g, -w_g)$ is a direct summand of $(A_g \rtimes G, -w_g \otimes 1)$ as a right quasi-module over $(A_g, -w_g)$ . Hence, by the quasi-Morita invariance the induced morphism of mixed complexes

$$\begin{align*}\overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (\mathrm{End} _{A_g} (A_g \rtimes G) , -w_g \otimes 1) \to \overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (A_g, w_g)) \end{align*}$$

is a quasi-isomorphism.

We have a diagram of chain maps

(4.6)

where:

  • two vertical chain maps are quasi-isomorphisms as explained already;

  • the middle horizontal map $\tau |_{A\rtimes G}$ is induced from the composition $natural \circ \tau $ ;

  • $\psi _A$ is the quasi-isomorphic chain map defined by Baranovsky [Reference Baranovsky4, page 799], Segal[Reference Segal40], and Căldăraru and Tu [Reference Căldăraru and Tu8, Proof of 6.3];

  • $\mathrm {Tr}$ is the generalized trace map.

Lemma 4.14. The triangle in equation (4.6) is commutative. Hence, $\tau |_{A\rtimes G} $ is a quasi-isomorphism.

Proof. This will be clear since g acts on $A_g$ trivially. Note that the following diagram commutes

(4.7)

where $\overline {a}$ denotes the element in $A_g$ associated to a. Here, the right-bottom corner is meant to have the g-th component

$$\begin{align*}\left\{\begin{array}{cl} |G| \cdot \overline{a}_0 [ g_0 \overline{a}_1 | \cdots | g_0 \cdots g_{n-1} g^{-1} \overline{a}_n ] & \text{ if } g = g_0 \cdots g_n \\ 0 & \text { otherwise. } \end{array} \right. \end{align*}$$

Remark 4.15. Note that for for example, when $A = k$ with a nontrivial G, diagram (4.7) is not commutative without the twisting $\mathfrak {tw}$ insertion in the definition of $\tau $ .

4.5 Proof of Proposition 4.13

Due to Remark 4.12 and the compatibility of the map $\tau $ with Čech differentials, the proof follows from Lemma 4.14.

4.6 The role of $\mathfrak {can}$ at the level of category

As we have already remarked, the insertion of central automorphism $\mathfrak {tw}$ was essential. We would like to sketch how it appears naturally in the computation of Hochschild invariants to clarify its role. The proof of Proposition 4.13 can be interpreted as a two-step process.

The first step is purely categorical. Suppose a k-linear category $\mathcal C$ carries a strict G-action of a finite group G. We still denote corresponding endofunctors by $g:\mathcal C \to \mathcal C, \hskip 0.2cm g\in G$ . We also denote its category of G-equivariant objects by $\mathcal C_G$ . Its object consists of a pair $(E, \phi _g^E)$ , where E is an object of $\mathcal C$ and $\phi _g^E$ is an isomorphism $\phi _g^E : E \simeq gE$ satisfying a cocycle condition. The morphism is defined as usual.

There is a natural functor

$$\begin{align*}\widetilde{\phantom{a}} : \mathcal C \to \mathcal C_G\end{align*}$$

called linearization which is defined on objects as

$$\begin{align*}\widetilde E = \left(\bigoplus_{h\in G}hE, \phi_g^{\widetilde E}\right), \hskip 0.2cm \phi_g^{\widetilde E} : \bigoplus_{h\in G} hE = \bigoplus_{h\in G}g(hE) \simeq \bigoplus_{h \in G} (gh)E.\end{align*}$$

It is not hard to see that the linearization is a both left and right adjoint to the forgetful functor. Its essential image generates $\mathcal C_G$ and

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal C_G}(\widetilde E_1, \widetilde E_2) \simeq {\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal C}(\widetilde E_1, \widetilde E_2)^G.\end{align*}$$

This fact leads to the following simple description of Hochschild homology of $\mathcal C_G$ . (See [Reference Perry33].)

(4.8) $$ \begin{align} HH_*(\mathcal C_G) \simeq (\bigoplus_{g\in G} HH_*(\mathcal C, g))^G \simeq \bigoplus_{g \in \mathrm{Conj}(G)}HH_*(\mathcal C_{C(g)}, g). \end{align} $$

Here, $HH_*(\mathcal C , g)$ denotes Hochschild homology with coefficient g, where the endofunctor g is considered as a bimodule.

The second observation is geometric. For simplicity, let $\mathcal C = D(X)$ be a dg category of coherent sheaves on a smooth affine scheme $X={\mathrm {Spec}}(A)$ acted on by a finite group G. One can easily extend the discussion to the case of matrix factorizations. Each component of equation (4.8) has a simpler description:

(4.9) $$ \begin{align} HH_*(D_{C(g)}(X), g) \xrightarrow[\mathrm{res}]{\sim} HH_*(D_{C(g)}(X^g), g). \end{align} $$

Notice that the action of g on $X^g$ is trivial. If $(E, \{\phi _h^E\}_{h\in G})$ is a G-equivariant sheaves on X, then $\varphi ^E_g = \left (\phi _g^E\right )^{-1}$ restricts to the central automorphism $\mathfrak {can} _{E\vert _{X_g}}$ of $E\vert _{X^g}$ . In fact, any $C(g)$ -equivariant object $(F, \{\phi ^F_h\}_{h\in C(g)})$ on $X^g$ carries a distinguished automophism $\mathfrak {can}_F = \left (\phi ^F_g\right )^{-1}$ . This assignment is viewed as a natural transformation between identity functors or an element of zeroth Hochschild cohomology;

$$\begin{align*}[\mathfrak{can}] \in HH^0(D_{C(g)}(X^g)).\end{align*}$$

The map $\mathfrak {tw}$ on Hochschild chains is a cap product with $[\mathfrak {can}]$ .

Lastly, observe that $D_{C(g)}(X^g)$ is generated by $\mathcal O_{X^g}$ . Notice that g-action on $\mathcal O_{X^g}$ is trivial, so $\mathfrak {can}$ could be ignored. This implies

(4.10) $$ \begin{align} HH_*(A_g)^{C(g)} \xrightarrow[\mathrm{inc}]{\sim}HH_*(D_{C(g)}(X^g), g). \end{align} $$

4.7 Mixed complex case

In general, the map $\tau $ is not a morphism of mixed complexes. In this subsection, we modify $\tau $ to get a morphism of mixed complexes.

For $\chi \in \hat {\mu _r}$ , let $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^{\chi } (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ be the full subcategory of $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ consisting $\chi $ -eigenobjects of $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w)$ . The map $\mathfrak {tw}$ restricted to the subcomplex $C ( q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^{\chi } (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w) )$ , denoted by $\mathfrak {tw} _{\chi }$ , is nothing but the multiplication by $\chi (e^{2\pi i/r})$ . Hence,

$$\begin{align*}\mathfrak{tw}_{\chi} : \mathrm{MC} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^{\chi} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}) ) \to \mathrm{MC} ( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^{\chi} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}) ) \end{align*}$$

is an automorphism of the mixed Hochschild complex.

Consider the composition $\tau _m$ of a sequence of morphisms of mixed complexes

$$ \begin{align*} \tau _m: &\overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w)) \xrightarrow{pullback} \oplus _{r, \chi} \overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^{\chi} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, w)) \\ &\qquad \hspace{1cm} \xrightarrow{\oplus \mathfrak{tw}_{\chi} } \oplus _{r, \chi} \overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^{\chi} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, w))\xrightarrow{nat} \oplus _{r} \Gamma (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, \overline{\mathrm{MC}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-) ) ) , \end{align*} $$

where the natural map $nat$ is defined by setting

$$\begin{align*}nat \left(\sum _{\chi} a^{\chi}_0 [\overline{a}^{\chi}_1 | \ldots | \overline{a}^{\chi}_n ] ) = (U\mapsto \sum_{\chi} a^{\chi}_{0|_{IU}} [\overline{a}^{\chi}_{1|_{IU}} | \ldots | \overline{a}^{\chi}_{n|_{IU}}] \right). \end{align*}$$

Remark 4.16. While the cochain map

$$\begin{align*}C ^{II} ( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, w) ) \xrightarrow{\mathrm{Tr}} \oplus _{\chi} C ^{II} ( q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ^{\chi} (I_{\mu_r}{\mathcal{X}}, w) ) \end{align*}$$

is an isomorphism, $ \overline {C} ^{II} ( q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w) ) \xrightarrow {\overline {\mathrm {Tr}}} \oplus _{\chi } \overline {C} ^{II} ( q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ^{\chi } (I_{\mu _r}{\mathcal {X}}, w) ) $ is not an isomorphism in general but a quasi-isomorphism from the facts that $C ^{II}\to \overline {C}^{II}$ is a quasi-isomorphism and the above $\mathrm {Tr}$ is an isomorphism.

Proposition 4.17. Suppose that ${\mathcal {X}}$ is of form $[{\mathrm {Spec}} A/ G]$ as in Proposition 4.13. The morphism $\tau _m$ in the category of mixed complexes is a quasi-isomorphism.

Proof. By the definition, we need to show that $\tau _m$ is a quasi-isomorphism between Hochschild-type chain complexes. Replacing $\tau $ by $\tau _m$ and $\overline {C} ^{II}$ by $\overline {\mathrm {MC}} ^{II}$ in diagram (4.6) we conclude the proof.

4.8 Global case

Let $\underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ denote the coarse moduli space of ${\mathcal {X}}$ . For an étale map $V\to \underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ , let ${\mathcal {X}}_V := V \times _{ \underline {{\mathcal {X}}} } {\mathcal {X}}$ . We take the sheafification $\underline {\overline {\mathrm {MC}}} ^{II} (q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w))$ (resp. $\underline {\overline {\mathrm {MC}}} ^{II} (q\mathrm {MF} _{I{\mathcal {X}}, w})$ ) of the presheaf

$$\begin{align*}V\mapsto \overline{\mathrm{MC}} ^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} _V, w)) \text{ resp. } (V\mapsto \Gamma (I{\mathcal{X}} _V, \overline{\mathrm{MC}} ^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-))) \end{align*}$$

both on the étale site of $\underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ . We take the sheaf homomorphism $\underline {\tau }_m$ induced from $\tau _m$

$$\begin{align*}\underline{\tau}_m : \underline{\overline{\mathrm{MC}}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} ,w ) ) \to \underline{\overline{\mathrm{MC}}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF} _{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} (-)). \end{align*}$$

Lemma 4.18. Suppose that ${\mathcal {X}}$ is smooth over k. Then the induced morphism ${\mathbb R}\Gamma (\underline {\tau }_m)$ fits into a diagram of isomorphisms in the derived category of mixed complexes:

(4.11)

Proof. The right vertical map is a quasi-isomorphism by the quasi-Morita invariance and the fact that for each étale morphism $U\to I{\mathcal {X}}$ the Yoneda embedding $({\mathcal {O}} _{I{\mathcal {X}}} (U) , -w) \to q\mathrm {MF} _{I{\mathcal {X}}, w} (U)$ is a pseudo-equivalence; see [Reference Brown and Walker5, Proposition 3.25] and [Reference Polishchuk and Positselski36]. It remains to show that the left vertical map is a quasi-isomorphism. Let $\pi : {\mathcal {X}} \to \underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ be the coarse moduli space. By [Reference Halpern-Leistner and Pomerleano17, Corollary 4.6], the presheaf $(V\mapsto \overline {C} (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ( V \times _{\underline {{\mathcal {X}}}} {\mathcal {X}} , w))$ is a sheaf on the étale site of $\underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ . It is thus enough to show that the left vertical map is a quasi-isomorphism when ${\mathcal {X}} = [X/G]$ for a smooth variety X and a finite group G which follows from [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10, Theorem 6.9].

Theorem 4.19. Suppose that ${\mathcal {X}}$ is smooth over k. Then the isomorphism

(4.12) $$ \begin{align} \overline{\mathrm{MC}} (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} , w)) \cong {\mathbb R}\Gamma ( \underline{\overline{\mathrm{MC}}}^{II} ( {\mathcal{O}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}} , -w|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \end{align} $$

in the derived category of mixed complexes induces an isomorphism

$$\begin{align*}\overline{\mathrm{MC}} (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} , w)) \cong {\mathbb R}\Gamma (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, ud) .\end{align*}$$

Proof. The proof follows from Lemma 4.18 and the HKR-type isomorphism ([Reference Căldăraru and Tu8, Reference Segal40]) for affine orbifolds.

5 Chern character formulae

Let ${\mathcal {X}}$ be a smooth separated finite-type DM stack over k, and let $w : {\mathcal {X}} \to \mathbb {A}^1_k$ be an algebraic function on ${\mathcal {X}}$ with only critical value $0$ .

5.1 A formula via Čech model and Chern–Weil theory

We fix an affine étale surjective morphism $\mathfrak {p} : \mathfrak {U} \to {\mathcal {X}}$ from a k-scheme $\mathfrak {U}$ as in § 4.2. Since $\mathfrak {U}$ is an affine scheme over k, every $E|_{\mathfrak {U}}$ has a connection

$$\begin{align*}\nabla _{E|_{\mathfrak{U}}} : E|_{\mathfrak{U}} \to E|_{\mathfrak{U}} \otimes \Omega _{\mathfrak{U}}^1. \end{align*}$$

Define a connection

$$\begin{align*}\nabla _{E |_{\mathfrak{U}^r}} : E|_{\mathfrak{U}^r} \to E|_{\mathfrak{U}^r} \otimes \Omega _{\mathfrak{U}^r}^1 \end{align*}$$

by letting $\nabla _{E |_{\mathfrak {U}^r}} = p_1^* \nabla _{E |_{\mathfrak {U}}}$ , where $p_1$ is the first projection $\mathfrak {U}^r \to \mathfrak {U}$ . This gives rise to a connection

$$\begin{align*}\nabla _E : \check{\text{C}} (E) \to \Omega ^1_{{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes \check{\text{C}} (E), \end{align*}$$

where $\check{\text{C}} (E) := ( \bigoplus _{r \ge 0} \check{\text{C}} ^r (E), d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} )$ and $\check{\text{C}} ^r (E)= \mathfrak {p}_{r*} \mathfrak {p}_{r}^{*} E $ . For every E, fix such a connection once and for all.

Let $I\mathfrak {U}$ denote the affine scheme $\mathfrak {U} \times _{{\mathcal {X}}} I{\mathcal {X}}$ . Using this affine covering of $I{\mathcal {X}}$ , we have the Čech resolution $\check{\text{C}} (E|_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ and the connection

$$\begin{align*}\nabla _{ E|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} : \check{\text{C}} (E|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) \to \Omega ^1_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes \check{\text{C}} (E|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) .\end{align*}$$

In general, for every vector bundle F on $I{\mathcal {X}}$ , we can choose a connection $\nabla _F : \check{\text{C}} (F ) \to \Omega ^1_{I{\mathcal {X}}} \otimes \check{\text{C}} (F) $ .

For each $P\in q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w) )$ , choose a connection $\nabla _{P}$ as above once and for all. Let $R = u \nabla _{\nabla }^2 + [\nabla _{P} , \delta _{\check{\text{C}} (P)} ]$ a kind of the total curvature of $\nabla _P$ . By a straightforward generalization of the definition of a chain map ${\mathrm {tr}} _{\nabla }$ in [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10] to the stacky case, we obtain a $k[[u]]$ -linear map

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}} _{\nabla, I{\mathcal{X}}} : C (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal{X}}, w) ) [[u]] \to \Gamma ( \check{\text{C}} (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) ) [[u]] \end{align*}$$

mapping $a_0[a_1| \cdots | a_n]$ for $a_i \in \mathrm {End} _{\check{\text{C}} (P)} (P)$ , $P\in q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w) )$ to

$$\begin{align*}\sum _{(j_0, \ldots , j_n) : j_i \in {\mathbb Z} _{\ge 0}} \frac{(-1)^{|j_0 + \cdots + j_n| }{\mathrm{tr}} (a_0 R^{j_0} [\nabla _{P}, a_1] R^{j_1} [\nabla _{P}, a_2] \cdots [\nabla _{P}, a_n] R^{j_n} ) } {(n+|j_0 + \cdots + j_n|)!}. \end{align*}$$

It is clear how to map an arbitrary element of $C (q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} (I{\mathcal {X}}, w) ) [[u]]$ . By the same proof in [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10, Appendix B], the map ${\mathrm {tr}} _{\nabla , I{\mathcal {X}}} $ is a chain map. Likewise, we have a chain map

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}}_{\nabla} : \underline{\overline{C}}^{II} (q\mathrm{MF}_{I{\mathcal{X}}, w} ) [[u]] \to p_*\check{\text{C}} (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) [[u]] , \end{align*}$$

where $p : I{\mathcal {X}} \to \underline {{\mathcal {X}}}$ is the natural morphism.

Consider a diagram of chain maps in negative cyclic type complexes

(5.1)

Note that the diagram is commutative, and all arrows may possibly be quasi-isomorphisms but the two top horizontal arrows are quasi-isomorphisms. Hence, we have the following corollaries.

Corollary 5.1. The chain map

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}}_{\nabla, I{\mathcal{X}}} \circ \mathfrak{tw} \circ \rho _{{\mathcal{X}}}^*: C (q\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w) ) [[u]] \to \Gamma ( \check{\text{C}} (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) ) [[u]] \end{align*}$$

is a quasi-isomorphism.

Corollary 5.2. Under the isomorphism in equation (4.11), the Chern character $\mathrm {ch} _{HN} (P)$ of $P \in \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is the class represented by Čech cocycle

$$ \begin{align*} {\mathrm{tr}} \left( \mathfrak{can} _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \circ \exp ( - u \nabla _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}}^2 - [\nabla_{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} , \delta _{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] ) \right) \end{align*} $$

in $\check {H} (I\mathfrak {U}, (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}})) $ .

Example 5.3. Consider a DM stack ${\mathcal {X}}$ of the form $[X/G]$ with X quasi-projective and G a linearly reductive group. Then there is a finite collection $\mathfrak {U}=\{ U_i \}_{i \in I}$ of G-invariant affine open subset $U_i$ of X such that $\bigcup _i U_i = X$ . On the other hand, there is a finite subset S of G such that

$$\begin{align*}I{\mathcal{X}} = \sqcup _{g \in S} [ X^g / \mathrm{C} _G (g ) ]. \end{align*}$$

Note that $I\mathfrak {U} = \{ U_i ^g : i \in I, g \in S \} $ . Instead of affine étale covering, we may use the affine smooth covering $\mathfrak {U}$ for a Čech model of $q\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and the chain map ${\mathrm {tr}} _{\nabla , I{\mathcal {X}}}$ . Since G is linearly reductive, each $P|_{U_i}$ has a G-equivariant connection, which in turn gives a $\mathrm {C} _{G}(g)$ -equivariant connection $\nabla _{i, g}$ on $P|_{U^g_i}$ . This is because of the surjection of the canonical map ${\mathrm {Hom}} ^G_{{\mathcal {O}} _{X}} (E, J(E)) \to {\mathrm {Hom}} ^G_{{\mathcal {O}} _{X}} (E, E)$ induced from the jet sequence

$$\begin{align*}0 \to \Omega ^1_X \otimes_{{\mathcal{O}}_X} E \to J(E) \to E \to 0. \end{align*}$$

We have

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch}_{HN} (P) = \oplus _{g\in S} {\mathrm{tr}} \left( g \circ \exp ( - u \Pi _{i \in I} \nabla _{i, g}^2 - [\Pi _{i\in I} \nabla_{i, g}, \delta _{P|_{U^g}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] ) \right). \end{align*}$$

When X itself is affine, then the formula simplifies to

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch}_{HN} (P) = \oplus _{g\in S} {\mathrm{tr}} \left( g \circ \exp ( - u \nabla _{g}^2 - [ \nabla_{ g}, \delta _{P|_{U^g}} ] ) \right) , \end{align*}$$

taking into account the fact that $[\nabla _{g}, d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] = 0$ .

Let $a \in \oplus _i {\mathbb R} ^i\mathrm {End} (P)$ , then it determines a class in $H^* (I{\mathcal {X}} , (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}} ))$ under the HKR isomorphism. Denote the class by $\tau (a)$ . The assignment $a \mapsto \tau (a)$ is called the boundary-bulk map.

Corollary 5.4 (The boundary-bulk map formula)

$$\begin{align*}\tau (a) = {\mathrm{tr}} \left( a \circ \mathfrak{can} _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \circ \exp ( - [\nabla_{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} , \delta _{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] ) \right). \end{align*}$$

5.2 A formula via Atiyah class

Let $P \in \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ , and let

be the matrix factorization for $({\mathcal {X}}, 0)$ located at amplitude $[-1, 0 ]$ . The Atiyah class $\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P)$ defined in [Reference Favero and Kim16, Appendix B] is a suitable element of

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P, P \otimes \Omega ^{-dw} _{{\mathcal{X}}} ). \end{align*}$$

When $w=0$ , we have the decomposition

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P, P \otimes \Omega ^{-dw} _{{\mathcal{X}}} ) = {\mathrm{Ext}} ^0 (P, P) \oplus {\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P, P\otimes \Omega ^1_{{\mathcal{X}}}) \end{align*}$$

and let

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{at} (P) = proj \circ \hat{\mathrm{at}} (P) \in {\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P, P\otimes \Omega ^1_{{\mathcal{X}}}) ,\end{align*}$$

where $proj$ is the projection. For example, when P is a vector bundle F and ${\mathcal {X}}$ is nonstacky, then $\mathrm {at} (F)$ is the usual Atiyah class [Reference Atiyah2]. In this case $\hat {\mathrm {at}} (F) = 1_F + \mathrm {at} (F)$ .

Definition 5.5. Taking into account the convention of the exponential $\underline {\exp }$ of $\hat {P}$ as explained in [Reference Favero and Kim16, Reference Kim and Polishchuk24], we define a naive Chern character of P by

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch} (P) := {\mathrm{tr}} \big( \underline{\exp} (\hat{\mathrm{at}} (P)) \big) \in H^* ({\mathcal{X}}, ( \Omega ^{\bullet}_{{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw)). \end{align*}$$

For simplicity, we abuse notation writing $\exp (\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P))$ for $\underline {\exp } (\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P))$ .

The correct formula for $\mathrm {ch} _{HH} (P)$ in [Reference Kim and Polishchuk25] is

(5.2) $$ \begin{align} \mathrm{ch} _{HH} (P) & = {\mathrm{tr}} \left( \mathfrak{can}_{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \circ \exp (\hat{\mathrm{at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) ) \right) \\ \nonumber & = \mathrm{ch} (P) + \text{ twisted part }. \end{align} $$

We note that this formula agrees with the formula in Corollary 5.2 since Atiyah class $\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ is representable as

$$\begin{align*}(\mathrm{id}_P, - [\nabla_{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} , \delta _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] ) \in \Gamma (I{\mathcal{X}}, \mathrm{End} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \otimes \Omega ^{-dw} _{{\mathcal{X}}}\otimes \check{\text{C}} ({\mathcal{O}} _{IX})) \end{align*}$$

in Čech cohomology $\check {H} (I\mathfrak {U}, \Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}) $ (see [Reference Kim and Polishchuk24, Proposition 1.3]) and

$$\begin{align*}\underline{\exp} (\mathrm{id}_P, - [\nabla_{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} , \delta _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ] ) = \exp (- [\nabla_{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} , \delta _{P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} + d_{\scriptscriptstyle \check{\text{C}}\text{ech}} ]). \end{align*}$$

The boundary bulk map formula can also be written in terms of the Atiyah class:

$$\begin{align*}\tau (a) = {\mathrm{tr}} \left( a \circ \mathfrak{can}_{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \circ \exp (\hat{\mathrm{at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) ) \right). \end{align*}$$

Definition 5.6. For a vector bundle E on $I{\mathcal {X}}$ , we define

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch} _{tw} (E) := {\mathrm{tr}} (\mathfrak{can} _E \exp (\mathrm{at} (E)) \end{align*}$$

and Todd class $\mathrm {td} _{tw} (E)$ of E by the expression of Todd class in terms of the Chern character $\mathrm {ch} _{tw} (E)$ . For example, $\mathrm {td} _{tw} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ is defined. Since $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ is fixed under the canonical automorphism, we simply write $\mathrm {td} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ for $\mathrm {td} _{tw} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ .

5.3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

The first statement of Theorem 1.1 is Theorem 4.19. The second statement follows from equation (5.2).

5.4 Compactly supported case

Let Z be a closed substack of ${\mathcal {X}}$ proper over k. Let P be a matrix factorization for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ which is coacyclic over ${\mathcal {X}} - Z$ . Note that

$$\begin{align*}\hat{\mathrm{at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \in {\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes \Omega ^{-dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) = {\mathrm{Ext}} ^1 _{IZ} (P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \otimes \Omega ^{-dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} _{I{\mathcal{X}}} ). \end{align*}$$

To emphasize that $\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}) $ can be considered as an $IZ$ -supported extension class, write $\hat {\mathrm {at}}_Z (P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}) $ for $\hat {\mathrm {at}} (P|_{I{\mathcal {X}}}) $ . Let $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w))_Z$ be the full subcategory of $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ consisting of all matrix factorization for $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ that are coacyclic over ${\mathcal {X}} - Z$ .

Corollary 5.7. There is an isomorphism

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{MC} (\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w))_Z \cong {\mathbb R}\Gamma _Z (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}} , d) \end{align*}$$

in the derived category of mixed complexes. Under the isomorphism $\mathrm {ch} ^Z_{HH}, (P)$ is equal to

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}} \big( \mathfrak{can} _{P|_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \exp ( \hat{\mathrm{at}}_Z (P |_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )) \big) \end{align*}$$

in ${\mathbb H} ^*_{IZ} ( I{\mathcal {X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal {X}}} ) )$ .

Proof. The first statement immediately follows from Theorem 1.1. The second statement follows from a concrete chain map for the Hochschild-type chain complexes; see [Reference Chung, Kim and Kim10, § 6.2] for some details.

6 Riemann–Roch for stacky matrix factorizations

6.1 The categorical HRR

The results in this subsection are taken from [Reference Polishchuk and Vaintrob35, Reference Shklyarov41] with a weaker condition on a dg category ${\mathcal {A}}$ . Instead of assuming that ${\mathcal {A}}$ is saturated, we assume that ${\mathcal {A}}$ is locally proper and smooth.

Definition 6.1. Let ${\mathcal {A}}$ be a locally proper dg category: That is, for every $x, y\in {\mathcal {A}}$ , the dimension $\sum _{i\in {\mathbb G}} \dim H^i {\mathrm {Hom}} _{{\mathcal {A}}} (x, y)$ of total cohomology of ${\mathrm {Hom}} _{{\mathcal {A}}} (x, y)$ is finite. Let

$$\begin{align*}\langle , \rangle _{can} : HH _* ({\mathcal{A}}) \times HH_* ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op}) \to k \end{align*}$$

be the canonical pairing of ${\mathcal {A}}$ defined by Shklyarov. It is a k-linear pairing.

6.1.1 Transformations by bimodules

Definition 6.2. For a dg category ${\mathcal {C}}$ , we take the projective model structure on the category $\mathrm {Mod} ({\mathcal {C}})$ of right ${\mathcal {C}}$ -modules. The cofibrant objects are exactly the summands of semifree dg-modules. A right ${\mathcal {C}}$ -module N is called perfect if N is a cofibrant object which is compact in the derived category $D({\mathcal {C}} )$ of right ${\mathcal {C}}$ -modules. Let $\mathrm {Mod} _{dg}({\mathcal {C}})$ be the dg category of right ${\mathcal {C}}$ -modules. Let $\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {C}})$ be the full subcategory of $\mathrm {Mod} _{dg}({\mathcal {C}})$ consisting of all perfect ${\mathcal {C}}$ -modules. We call a dg category ${\mathcal {C}}$ is smooth if the diagonal bimodule $\Delta _{{\mathcal {A}}}$ is a perfect bimodule.

From now on, let ${\mathcal {A}}$ and $\mathcal {B}$ be locally perfect and smooth dg categories unless otherwise stated.

Lemma 6.3. The total dimension of Hochschild homology $HH_*({\mathcal {A}})$ of ${\mathcal {A}}$ is finite. The dg category $\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}} \otimes \mathcal {B})$ is locally perfect and smooth.

Proof. The first claim amounts $ \Delta _{{\mathcal {A}}} \otimes _{{\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes {\mathcal {A}}}^{\mathbb {L}} \Delta _{{\mathcal {A}}} $ is a perfect dg k-module, which follows from tensor-hom adjunction and the conditions on ${\mathcal {A}}$ . The second claim follows from [Reference Lunts and Schnürer30, Lemma 2.13, 2.14, 2.15] since k is a field.

For a right ${\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal {B}$ -module M, there is a dg functor $T_M : \mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}}) \to \mathrm {Mod}_{dg} (\mathcal {B}) $ sending N to $N\otimes _{{\mathcal {A}}} M$ . If M is representable, then $T_M$ factors though $\mathrm {Perf} (\mathcal {B})$ since ${\mathcal {A}}$ is locally proper. Hence, this is the case for every perfect ${\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal {B}$ -module M.

Let $M \in \mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal {B})$ , and let $\mathrm {Ch} (M) = \sum _i \gamma _i \otimes \gamma ^i $ under the Künneth isomorphism $ HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal {B}) ) \cong HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}} ^{op})) \otimes HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} (\mathcal {B}) ) .$ Let $HH (T_M) : HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}})) \to HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} (\mathcal {B}))$ be the homomorphism induced by $T_M : \mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}}) \to \mathrm {Perf} (\mathcal {B})$ .

Proposition 6.4. If $\langle , \rangle _{can}$ denotes the canonical pairing of $\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal {B})$ , then for every $\sigma \in HH_* (\mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}}))$ we have

$$\begin{align*}HH (T_M) (\sigma ) = \sum _i \langle \sigma, \gamma _i \rangle _{can} \gamma ^i. \end{align*}$$

6.1.2 The characteristic property

There are natural isomorphisms

$$\begin{align*}HH_* (\mathrm{Perf} ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op} \otimes {\mathcal{A}} )) \cong HH_* ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op} \otimes {\mathcal{A}}) \cong HH_* ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op}) \otimes HH_*( {\mathcal{A}} ) \end{align*}$$

by the Morita invariance and the Künneth isomorphism. Write

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{Ch} _{HH}(\Delta _{{\mathcal{A}}}) = \sum _i T^i \otimes T_i \in HH_*({\mathcal{A}} ^{op}) \otimes HH_* ({\mathcal{A}} ). \end{align*}$$

Then by Proposition 6.4 we obtain this.

Corollary 6.5. The canonical pairing $\langle , \rangle _{can}$ is characterized by two conditions: (1) it is nondegenerate and (2) it satisfies the ‘diagonal decomposition’ property:

$$\begin{align*}\sum _i \langle \gamma , T^i \rangle \langle T_i , \gamma ' \rangle = \langle \gamma, \gamma ' \rangle \end{align*}$$

for every $\gamma \in HH_*({\mathcal {A}}), \gamma ' \in HH_*({\mathcal {A}} ^{op})$ .

6.1.3 The Cardy condition

Consider objects $x, y \in {\mathcal {A}}$ . Let a and b be closed endomorphisms of x and y, respectively. Let

$$\begin{align*}L_b \circ R_a : {\mathrm{Hom}} _{{\mathcal{A}}} (x, y) \to {\mathrm{Hom}} _{{\mathcal{A}}} (x, y) , \ (-1)^{|a||c|} \mapsto b \circ c \circ a. \end{align*}$$

Theorem 6.6. We have

$$\begin{align*}{\mathrm{tr}} (L_b \circ R_a) = \langle [b], [a] \rangle _{can}. \end{align*}$$

For the identities $a=1_x$ , $b=1_y$ , it is specialized to

$$\begin{align*}\chi (x, y) = \langle \mathrm{Ch}_{HH} (y), \mathrm{Ch}_{HH} (x) \rangle _{can}. \end{align*}$$

6.2 On $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$

Consider two proper LG models $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ and $({\mathcal {Y}}, v)$ . We want to show that $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is locally proper, smooth; and the following $(\dagger )$ and $(\star )$ hold:

$(\dagger )$ There is a natural dg functor

$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} \times {\mathcal{Y}}, w \boxplus v) & \to \mathrm{Perf} (\mathrm{MF}_{dg}({\mathcal{X}}, w) \otimes \mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{Y}}, v)) \quad \text{ defined by } \\ E & \mapsto \Psi (E) : x \otimes y \mapsto {\mathrm{Hom}} _{\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} \times {\mathcal{Y}}, w \boxplus v) } (x\boxtimes y, E). \end{align*} $$

Here, $w \boxplus v$ denotes $w \otimes 1 + 1 \otimes v$ .

$(\star )$ The triangulated category $[\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}, w \boxplus v)]$ is the smallest full triangulated subcategory containing all exterior products closed under finite coproducts and summands. Here, an object of $[\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}, w \boxplus v)]$ is called an exterior product if it is isomorphic to $x\boxtimes y$ for some $x \in \mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {X}}, w) , y \in \mathrm {MF}_{dg}({\mathcal {Y}}, v) $ .

Lemma 6.7.

  1. 1. $(\star )$ implies $(\dagger )$ .

  2. 2. $(\dagger )$ implies that the smoothness of $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ .

Proof. (1) is clear. Let $\Delta : {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {X}} ^2$ be the diagonal morphism. Then (2) follows from the fact that $\Psi (\Delta {\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}})$ is quasi-isomorphic to the diagonal bimodule.

Since $\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ is clearly locally proper, it is enough to show $(\star )$ . We check this when ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a stack quotient $[X/G]$ of a smooth variety by an action of an affine algebraic group G. When ${\mathbb G} = {\mathbb Z}$ , then $w=0$ . Note that $(\star )$ holds by Theorem 2.29 and Corollary 4.21 of [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3]. When ${\mathbb G}={\mathbb Z}/2$ , then w is a G-invariant function on X, not identically zero on any component of X. Note that $(\star )$ holds by Theorem 2.29 and Lemma 4.23 of [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3].

6.3 A geometric realization of the diagonal module

Consider two proper LG models $({\mathcal {X}}, w), ({\mathcal {Y}}, v)$ . Suppose that ${\mathcal {X}}$ , ${\mathcal {Y}}$ are stack quotients of smooth varieties by actions of affine algebraic groups. Let $f: {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ be a proper morphism with $f^* v = w$ . We call $f : ({\mathcal {X}}, w) \to ({\mathcal {Y}}, v)$ an proper LG morphism. Choose an affine étale cover $\mathfrak {U} \to {\mathcal {X}}$ and $\mathfrak {U} ' \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ . Denote

$$\begin{align*}{\mathcal{A}} := \mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}}, w) , \ \mathcal{B} := \mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{Y}} , v ). \end{align*}$$

They are locally proper and smooth as seen in § 6.2.

Let $-w\boxplus v := - w\otimes 1 + 1\otimes v$ , and let $ \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}} , -w\boxplus v )$ be the Čech dg model of the matrix factorizations for $({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}} , -w\boxplus v )$ with respect to the affine cover $\mathfrak {U} \times \mathfrak {U} ' \to {\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}$ . Then by $(\dagger )$ we have a natural dg functor

$$\begin{align*}\Psi : \mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} \times {\mathcal{Y}} , -w\boxplus v ) \to \mathrm{Perf} ({\mathcal{A}} ^{op} \otimes \mathcal{B}). \end{align*}$$

Let $D: {\mathcal {A}} ^{op} \to \mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, -w)$ be the duality functor. Then we have a commuting diagram of isomorphisms

(6.1)

where HKR and Künneth are the HKR-type isomorphisms in § 4.8 and the Künneth isomorphisms, respectively.

Consider a matrix factorization K for $({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}, -w\boxplus v)$ . For example, we have a coherent factorization

$$\begin{align*}{\mathcal{O}} _{\Gamma _f} := (\Gamma _f )_* {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}} \text{ for } ({\mathcal{X}} \times {\mathcal{Y}}, -w\boxplus v). \end{align*}$$

Since ${\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}$ satisfies the resolution property by [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3, Theorem 2.29], ${\mathcal {O}} _{\Gamma _f}$ is quasi-isomorphic to a matrix factorization.

For all $x \in {\mathcal {A}}, y\in \mathcal {B}$ , there is a natural quasi-isomorphism

$$\begin{align*}{\mathbb R}{\mathrm{Hom}} ( y, q_* ( K \otimes p^*x )) \sim_{qiso} {\mathrm{Hom}} _{\mathrm{MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal{X}} \times {\mathcal{Y}} , -w\boxplus v)} ( x^{\vee} \boxtimes y, K ) \end{align*}$$

functorial under the morphisms in the categories $\mathcal {B}$ and ${\mathcal {A}}$ . This shows the following, which will be used later.

Lemma 6.8. For easy notation, write $T_{K}$ for $T_{\Psi (K)}$ . Then:

  1. 1. The transformation $T_{K}: \mathrm {Perf} ({\mathcal {A}}) \to \mathrm {Perf} (\mathcal {B})$ is a dg enhancement of the Fourier–Mukai transform $[{\mathcal {A}}] \to [\mathcal {B}]$ attached to the kernel K. In particular, $T_{{\mathcal {O}}_{\Gamma _f}}$ represents ${\mathbb R} f_*: [{\mathcal {A}}] \to [\mathcal {B}]$ .

  2. 2. The bimodule $\Psi ({\mathcal {O}} _{\Gamma _{\mathrm {id}}})$ and the diagonal bimodule $\Delta _{{\mathcal {A}}}$ are quasi-isomorphic.

The second statement in the above lemma is also in Lemma 5.24 of [Reference Ballard, Favero and Katzarkov3].

6.4 An explicit realization of the canonical pairing

Theorem 6.9. Let $({\mathcal {X}}, w)$ be a proper LG model. Assume that ${\mathcal {X}}$ is a smooth quotient DM stack which satisfies the resolution property. Then the canonical pairing coincides with the pairing defined by

(6.2) $$ \begin{align} \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \cdot \wedge \cdot \wedge \frac{\mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\lambda _{-1} ( N^{\vee}_{I{\mathcal{X}} / {\mathcal{X}}}))} , \end{align} $$

where $\dim _{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ is the locally constant dimension function of $I{\mathcal {X}}$ .

Proof. We prove the characteristic property in Corollary 6.5 for the pair (6.2). The nondegeneracy follows from Serre duality [Reference Nironi32] as argued in [Reference Favero and Kim16, § 4.1]. By Lemma 6.8 the ‘diagonal decomposition’ is

(6.3) $$ \begin{align} \sum _i \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} \gamma \cdot t^i \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} t^i \cdot \gamma ' \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) = \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \gamma " \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}), \end{align} $$

where

(6.4) $$ \begin{align} \sum_i t^i \otimes t_i & = \mathrm{ch} _{HH} (\Delta _* {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}}) \in {\mathbb H} ^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \otimes {\mathbb H}^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \nonumber \\ \gamma & \in {\mathbb H} ^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})), \gamma ' \in {\mathbb H}^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, -dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \nonumber \\ & \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) := \frac{\mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\lambda _{-1} ( N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/{\mathcal{X}}}^{\vee}))}. \end{align} $$

To show equation (6.3), we use the deformation to the normal cone.

Over ${\mathbb P}^1$ , there is a deformation stack ${\mathcal {M}}^{\circ }$ to the normal cone $N_{{\mathcal {X}} / {\mathcal {X}} ^2}$ : The general fiber is ${\mathcal {X}} ^2$ and the special fiber, say over $\infty $ , is the vector bundle stack $N_{{\mathcal {X}} / {\mathcal {X}} ^2} \cong T_{{\mathcal {X}}}$ . It comes with a natural morphism $h: {\mathcal {M}} ^{\circ } \to {\mathcal {X}} ^2$ , a flat morphism $pr: {\mathcal {M}} ^{\circ } \to {\mathbb P} ^1$ , and a morphism $\widetilde {\Delta } : {\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathbb P} ^1 \to {\mathcal {M}}^{\circ }$ such that $(h, pr) \circ \widetilde {\Delta } = \Delta \times \mathrm {id}_{{\mathbb P} ^1}$ . Consider the fiber square diagram

Here, we use facts that $I{\mathcal {X}} ^2 \cong I {\mathcal {X}} \times I {\mathcal {X}}$ and $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}} \overset {}{\cong } IT_{{\mathcal {X}}}$ by Lemma 3.1.

Let

$$\begin{align*}\pi _{{\mathcal{X}}} : T_{{\mathcal{X}}} \to {\mathcal{X}} \text{ and } \pi _{I{\mathcal{X}}} : T_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \to I{\mathcal{X}} \end{align*}$$

be the projections from vector bundles. Then left-hand side of equation (6.3) becomes

(6.5) $$ \begin{align} \int _{N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/ I{\mathcal{X}} ^2 }} \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* (\gamma ") (\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (\mathbb{L} \rho ^*_{T_{\mathcal{X}}} \delta_* {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}})) \cdot \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* (\widetilde{\mathrm{td}}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} )^2 \end{align} $$

by the Tor independence of the pair $({\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathbb P} ^1, {\mathcal {M}} ^{\circ } \times _{{\mathbb P} ^1} p)$ over ${\mathcal {M}} ^{\circ }$ for $p=0, \infty $ and the base change II in § 7.0.1; for details, see the proof of [Reference Kim23, § 3.3]. Let $\sigma $ be the diagonal section of the vector bundle $\pi _{{\mathcal {X}}}^* T_{\mathcal {X}}$ on $T_{{\mathcal {X}}}$ , and let $\mathrm {Kos} (\sigma )$ denote the Koszul complex associated to the section $\sigma $ . Then equation (6.5) becomes

$$ \begin{align*} \int _{N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/ I{\mathcal{X}} ^2 }} \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* (\gamma ") (\mathrm{ch}_{tw} ( \rho ^* _{T_{{\mathcal{X}}}}\mathrm{Kos} (\sigma))) \cdot \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* (\widetilde{\mathrm{td}}_{I{\mathcal{X}}})^2, \end{align*} $$

which equals, by the functoriality and the projection formula § 7.0.1,

(6.6) $$ \begin{align} \int _{I{\mathcal{X}} } \left( ( \gamma " \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \int _{\pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} (\mathrm{ch}_{tw} ( \rho ^*_{T_{{\mathcal{X}}}} \mathrm{Kos} (\sigma))) \cdot \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* (\widetilde{\mathrm{td}}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ) \right). \end{align} $$

Let $I\sigma $ be the diagonal section of the vector bundle $\pi _{I{\mathcal {X}}} ^* T_{I{\mathcal {X}}} $ on $T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ . From the short exact sequence in § 3.4.2, we have a short exact sequence

(6.7) $$ \begin{align} 0 \to \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ^* T_{I{\mathcal{X}}} \xrightarrow{\iota} \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ^*( T_{{\mathcal{X}}} |_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \to \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ^* N_{I{\mathcal{X}} / {\mathcal{X}}} \to 0; \\ \nonumber \text{ with } \iota (I\sigma) = \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* \sigma \end{align} $$

and an equality

(6.8) $$ \begin{align} T_{{\mathcal{X}}} |_{I{\mathcal{X}}} ^{\mathrm{{fixed}}} = T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}. \end{align} $$

Then equation (6.6) becomes, by equations (6.7) and (6.8),

$$ \begin{align*} \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} \left( ( \gamma " \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) ) \int _{\pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}} \mathrm{ch} (\mathrm{Kos} (I\sigma) ) \pi_{I{\mathcal{X}}}^* \mathrm{td} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \right) \end{align*} $$

which becomes, by § 7.0.2,

$$ \begin{align*} \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \gamma " \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}). \end{align*} $$

This completes the proof.

6.5 Proof of Theorem 1.2

This follows from Theorems 6.6 and 6.9.

6.6 GRR

Consider a proper morphism $f: {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ with $f^* v = w$ as in § 6.3. Let $K_0 ({\mathcal {A}})$ be the Grothendieck group of the homotopy category of a pretriangulated dg category ${\mathcal {A}}$ . Denote $f_! : K_0 (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w) ) \to K_0 (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {Y}} , v) ) $ be the homomorphism in the Grothendieck groups induced from ${\mathbb R} f_*$ .

Theorem 6.10 (=Theorem 1.3)

The diagram

is commutative. Here, $\widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{If}) : = \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}) / If^* \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{I{\mathcal {Y}}})$ and $\dim _{If} = \dim _{I{\mathcal {X}}} - \dim _{I{\mathcal {Y}}} $ , where $\widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{?})$ is $\widetilde {\mathrm {td}}$ for $T_?$ in equation (6.4).

Proof. The proof is parallel to that of Theorem 3.6 of [Reference Kim23]. The upper rectangle is clearly commutative. We show the commutativity of the lower rectangle. For $\gamma \in HH_* (\mathrm {MF}_{dg} ({\mathcal {X}}, w)) $ , let ${\alpha } := I_{HKR} (\gamma )$ , ${\alpha } ' := I_{HKR} (HH ({\mathbb R} f_* ) (\gamma )) $ , and let

$$\begin{align*}\mathrm{ch} (\Psi ( {\mathcal{O}} _{\Gamma _f})) = \sum_i T^i \otimes T_i \in {\mathbb H} ^{*} (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}}, dw|_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \otimes {\mathbb H} ^{*} (I{\mathcal{Y}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{Y}}}, -dv|_{I{\mathcal{Y}}})) , \end{align*}$$

then by Proposition 6.4 and Theorem 6.9 we have for $\beta \in {\mathbb H} ^{-*} (I{\mathcal {Y}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet }_{I{\mathcal {Y}}}, dv|_{I{\mathcal {Y}}}))$

(6.9) $$ \begin{align} \int _{I{\mathcal{Y}}} {\alpha} ' \wedge \beta \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{Y}}}) = \sum _i \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}\choose{2}} {\alpha} \wedge T^i \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \int _{I{\mathcal{Y}}} T_i \wedge \beta \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{Y}}}). \end{align} $$

Let $\pi $ denote the projection $If^*T_{I{\mathcal {Y}}} \to I{\mathcal {X}}$ , and let s be the diagonal section of $\pi ^*If^*T_{I{\mathcal {Y}}}$ on $If^*T_{I{\mathcal {Y}}} $ . Then the deformation argument for $\Gamma _f : {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {X}} \times {\mathcal {Y}}$ as in the proof of Theorem 6.9 shows that

$$ \begin{align*} & \text{right-hand side of equation (6.9)} \\ & = \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}\times I{\mathcal{Y}} } (-1)^{{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}\choose{2}} ({\alpha} \otimes \beta) \wedge \mathrm{ch} ({\mathcal{O}} ^{w\boxminus v}_{\Gamma _f }) \wedge ( \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) \otimes \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{Y}}})) \\ & = \int _{f^*T_{I{\mathcal{Y}}}}(-1)^{{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}\choose{2}} \pi ^* ({\alpha} \wedge If^* \beta \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (If^* T_{I{\mathcal{Y}}}) \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) ) \wedge \mathrm{ch} (\mathrm{Kos} (s)) \\ & = \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{{\dim _{If}+1}\choose{2}} {\alpha} \wedge f^* \beta \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}) = \int _{I{\mathcal{Y}}} (\int _{If} (-1)^{{\dim _{If}+1}\choose{2}} {\alpha} \wedge \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}})) \wedge \beta .\end{align*} $$

This completes the proof.

Remark 6.11. We briefly discuss how the GRR for $\Delta $ would compute the canonical pairing, which shows some relationship between GRR and the canonical pairing.

Consider the Riemann–Roch map

$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{ch} ^{\tau}: K_0 ({\mathcal{X}} , w) & \to {\mathbb H} ^* (I{\mathcal{X}}, (\Omega ^{\bullet}_{I{\mathcal{X}}} , -dw)) \\ E &\mapsto \mathrm{ch} _{HH} (E) \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} (T_{I{\mathcal{X}}}). \end{align*} $$

Suppose that we have a GRR type theorem for the diagonal map $\Delta : {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {X}} ^2$ :

(6.10) $$ \begin{align} \Delta _* \mathrm{ch} ^{\tau} ({\mathcal{O}} _X) = \mathrm{ch} ^{\tau} (\Delta _* {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}}) = \frac{\mathrm{td} (I{\mathcal{X}} ^2) \mathrm{ch}_{HH} (\Delta _* {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}})}{\mathrm{ch}_{tw} (N_{I{\mathcal{X}} ^2/{\mathcal{X}} ^2})}. \end{align} $$

This yields a formula

$$ \begin{align*} \mathrm{ch}_{HH}(\Delta _* ( {\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}})) = \Delta _* \left( \frac{ \mathrm{ch}_w(N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/ {\mathcal{X}}}) }{ \mathrm{td} (I{\mathcal{X}}) } \mathrm{ch} _{HH} ({\mathcal{O}} _{{\mathcal{X}}} )\right) = \Delta _* \frac{ \mathrm{ch}_w(N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/ {\mathcal{X}}}) }{ \mathrm{td} (I{\mathcal{X}}) } \end{align*} $$

since $\mathrm {ch} _{HH} ({\mathcal {O}} _{{\mathcal {X}}} ) = 1.$ Denote $ \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} = \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} {T_{I{\mathcal {X}}}} $ . Then

$$ \begin{align*} \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \gamma \cdot t^i \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} \ &\int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} t_i \cdot \gamma' \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} \\ &= \int _{I{\mathcal{X}} ^2} \gamma \otimes \gamma ' \cdot \Delta _* \frac{ \mathrm{ch}_w(N_{I{\mathcal{X}}/ {\mathcal{X}}}) }{ \mathrm{td} (I{\mathcal{X}}) } \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} \otimes \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} = \int _{I{\mathcal{X}}} (-1)^{\binom{\dim _{I{\mathcal{X}}}+1}{2}} \gamma \cdot \gamma ' \cdot \widetilde{\mathrm{td}} , \end{align*} $$

which is the characteristic property of the canonical pairing. Thus, equation (6.10) implies that the canonical pairing is $\int _{I{\mathcal {X}}} (-1)^{\binom {\dim _{I{\mathcal {X}}}+1}{2}} \cdot \wedge \cdot \wedge \widetilde {\mathrm {td}} (T_{I{\mathcal {X}}})$ .

7 Pushforward in Hodge cohomology

We introduced an operation $\int _{I{\mathcal {X}}}$ to formulate Theorem 6.9. In this subsection, we recall its definition and the basic properties we used.

7.0.1 Basic properties

In this section, all stacks are assumed to be smooth separated DM stacks of finite type over k. Let $f: {\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ be a morphism. Assume that they are pure dimensional, and let d be $\dim {\mathcal {X}} - \dim {\mathcal {Y}}$ .

Definition 7.1. Once we have the right adjoint functor $f^!$ of ${\mathbb R} f_*$ , as in [Reference Kim23] we can define

$$\begin{align*}\int _f: H ^{q}_{\sharp _1} ({\mathcal{X}}, \Omega ^p_{{\mathcal{X}}}) \to H^{q-d}_{\sharp _2} ({\mathcal{Y}}, \Omega _{{\mathcal{Y}}}^{p-d}), \end{align*}$$

where $(\sharp _1, \sharp _2)$ is either $(c, c)$ or $(cf, \emptyset )$ . When ${\mathcal {Y}}$ is ${\mathrm {Spec}}\,k$ , write $\int _{{\mathcal {X}}}$ for $\int _f$ .

The following can be straightforwardly proven as in [Reference Kim23, § 3.6].

  1. 1. (Base change I) Consider a Cartesian diagram (7.1) below. Assume that f is a flat, proper and locally complete intersection morphism. Then

    $$ \begin{align*} \int _{{\mathcal{X}} '} v^* (\gamma ) = u^* \left(\int _f \gamma \right). \end{align*} $$
  2. 2. (Base change II) Consider a Cartesian diagram (7.1) below. Assume that f is a flat morphism, ${\mathcal {Y}}$ is a connected one-dimensional smooth scheme, and u is the embedding of a closed point ${\mathcal {Y}}'$ of ${\mathcal {Y}}$ . Then

    $$ \begin{align*} \int _{{\mathcal{X}} '} v^* (\gamma ) = u^* \left(\int _f \gamma \right) \in k. \end{align*} $$
  3. 3. (Functoriality) Let ${\mathcal {X}} \xrightarrow {f} {\mathcal {Y}} \xrightarrow {g} {\mathcal {Z}}$ be morphisms. Then

    $$\begin{align*}\int _{g \circ f} = \int _g \circ \int _f. \end{align*}$$
  4. 4. (Projection formula) Let ${\mathcal {X}} \xrightarrow {f} {\mathcal {Y}}$ be a morphisms. Then

    $$\begin{align*}\int _f (f^* \sigma \wedge \gamma) = \sigma \wedge \int _f \gamma \end{align*}$$

    for $\gamma \in H^d_{cf} ({\mathcal {X}}, \Omega ^d_{{\mathcal {X}}})$ and $\sigma \in H^q ({\mathcal {Y}}, \Omega _{{\mathcal {Y}}}^p)$ .

Remark 7.2. In the construction of $\int _f$ , Nagata’s compactification and the resolution of singularities were used. In our separated DM stack setup, both are known by [Reference Rydh39] and [Reference Temkin42], respectively. Also, the existence of $f^!$ is also proven for proper morphism $f:{\mathcal {X}} \to {\mathcal {Y}}$ between Deligne–Mumford stacks in [Reference Nironi32].

Remark 7.3. The base change formula I and II relies on the following form of a base change formula; suppose that we have a tor-independent Cartesian diagram of DM stack

(7.1)

such that f is proper. One can ask whether the canonical base change map

$$\begin{align*}\beta: v^*f^! \to g^!u^*. \end{align*}$$

is an isomorphism. It is known to be true in scheme cases and generalized to stacks when u is representable affine. (See [Reference Huybrechts19, § 2, § 3] [Reference Lipman and Hashimoto28]).

7.0.2 Computation

Let E be a vector bundle on ${\mathcal {X}}$ of rank n, let $\pi : E \to {\mathcal {X}}$ be the projection and let s be the diagonal section of $\pi ^*E$ . Since $\pi $ is representable, we have

$$\begin{align*}\int _{\pi} \mathrm{ch} (\mathrm{Kos} (s)) \mathrm{td} (\pi ^* E) = (-1)^{{n+1}\choose{2}} \end{align*}$$

by the base change I in § 7.0.1 and the computation of [Reference Kim23, § 3.6.6].

Acknowledgements

We thank David Favero and Daniel Pomerleano for answering some questions that we had during the preparation of this manuscript. We thank Jeongseok Oh for comments on an initial draft. The third author thanks Charanya Ravi for discussions. We thank the anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions that helped improve the paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Financial support

B. Kim is supported by KIAS individual grant MG016404 at Korea Institute for Advanced Study. D. Choa is supported by KIAS individual grant MG079401 at Korea Institute for Advanced Study. B. Sreedhar was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R003-D1).

Footnotes

*:

The second author, Professor Bumsig Kim (1968–2021), sadly passed away during the final stages of the preparation of this manuscript. The first and third authors were both postdocs under his mentorship at Korea institute for advanced study when this project started. We thank Prof. Bumsig Kim for his mathematical generosity and kindness. We shall eternally be grateful for the opportunity to have known him not only as a great mathematician but also as a wonderful human being.

References

Abramovich, D. Graber, T. and Vistoli, A., ‘Gromov-Witten theory of Deligne–Mumford stacks’, American Journal of Mathematics 130(5) (2008), 13371398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M., ‘Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles’, Trans. AMS 85(1957), 181207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, M., Favero, D. and Katzarkov, L., ‘A category of kernels for equivariant factorizations and its implications for Hodge theory’, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 120 (2014), 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranovsky, V., ‘Orbifold cohomology as periodic cyclic homology’, Internat. J. Math. 14(8) (2003), 791812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Walker, M., ‘A Chern–Weil formula for the Chern character of a perfect curved module’, J. Noncommut. Geom. 14(2) (2020), 709772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. and Walker, M., ‘A proof of a conjecture of Shklyarov’, Journal of Noncommutative Geometry (2021).Google Scholar
Căldăraru, A., ‘Mukai pairing, The II The Hochschild-Kostant-Rosenberg isomorphism’, Adv. Math. 194(1) (2005), 3466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Căldăraru, A. and Tu, J., ‘Curved ${A}_{\infty }$ algebras and Landau-Ginzburg models’, New York J. Math. 19 (2013), 305342.Google Scholar
Ciocan-Fontanine, I., Favero, D., Guéré, J., Kim, B. and Shoemaker, M., ‘Fundamental factorization of a GLSM, part I: Construction’, in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. arXiv:1802.05247v3. To appear.Google Scholar
Chung, K., Kim, B. and Kim, T., ‘A chain-level HKR-type map and a Chern character formula’, Preprint, 2021, arXiv:2109.14372.Google Scholar
Edidin, D. and Graham, W., ‘Riemann–Roch for equivariant Chow groups’, Duke Math. J. 102(3) (2000), 567594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edidin, D. and Graham, W., ‘Riemann–Roch for quotients and Todd classes of simplicial toric varieties’, Comm. in Alg. 31 (2003), 37353752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edidin, D. and Graham, W., ‘Nonabelian localization in equivariant K-theory and Riemann–Roch for quotients’, Adv. Math. 198(2) (2005), 547582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efimov, A., ‘Cyclic homology of categories of matrix factorizations’, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 12 (2018), 38343869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efimov, A. and Positselski, L., ‘Coherent analogues of matrix factorizations and relative singularity categories’, Algebra Number Theory 9(5) (2015), 11591292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favero, D. and Kim, B., ‘General GLSM invariants and their cohomological field theories’, Preprint, 2020, arXiv:2006.12182.Google Scholar
Halpern-Leistner, D. and Pomerleano, D., ‘Equivariant Hodge theory and noncommutative geometry’, Preprint, 2015, arXiv:1507.01924v2.Google Scholar
Halpern-Leistner, D. and Pomerleano, D., ‘Equivariant Hodge theory and noncommutative geometry’, Geometry & Topology 24 (2020), 23612433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huybrechts, D., Fourier–Mukai Transforms in Algebraic Geometry, online edn. (Oxford Academic, Oxford, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawasaki, T., ‘The Riemann–Roch for complex V-manifolds’, Osaka J. Math. 16 (1979), 151159.Google Scholar
Keller, B., ‘Invariance and Localization for cyclic homology of DG algebras’, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 123 (1998), 223273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, B., ‘On the cyclic homology of ringed spaces and schemes’, Doc. Math. 3 (1998), 231259.Google Scholar
Kim, B., ‘Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch for global matrix factorizations’, Preprint, 2021, arXiv:2106.00435.Google Scholar
Kim, B. and Polishchuk, A., ‘Atiyah class and Chern character for global matrix facorizations’, Preprint, arXiv:1907.11441v3. To appear J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 21(4) (2022), 14451470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B. and Polishchuk, A., In preparation.Google Scholar
Kresch, A., ‘Cycle groups for Artin stacks’, Invent. Math. 138(3) (1999), 495536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, K. and Pomerleano, D., ‘Global matrix factorizations’, Math. Res. Lett. 20(1) (2013), 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, J. and Hashimoto, M., ‘Foundations of Grothendieck Duality for Diagrams of Schemes’, in Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1960 (Springer, Berlin, 2009).Google Scholar
Lunts, V. and Orlov, D., ‘Uniqueness of enhancement for triangulated categories’, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 23(3) (2010), 853908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunts, V. and Schnürer, O., ‘Matrix factorizations and motivic measures’, J. Noncommut. Geom. 10(3) (2016), 9811042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markarian, N., ‘The Atiyah class, Hochschild cohomology and the Riemann–Roch theorem’, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 79(1) (2009), 129143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nironi, F., ‘Grothendieck duality for Deligne-Mumford stacks’, Preprint, 2009, arXiv:0811.1955.Google Scholar
Perry, A., ‘Hochschild cohomology and group actions’, Mathematische Zeitschrift 297(3) (2021), 1273-1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., ‘Matrix factorizations and singularity categories for stacks’, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61(7) (2011), 26092642.Google Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Vaintrob, A., ‘Chern characters and Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch formula for matrix factorizations’, Duke Math. J. 161(10) (2012), 18631926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polishchuk, A. and Positselski, L., ‘Hochschild (co)homology of the second kind I’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364(10) (2012), 53115368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Positselski, L., ‘Two kinds of derived categories, Koszul duality, and comodule-contramodule correspondence’, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 212(996) (2011), vi+133 pp.Google Scholar
Ramadoss, A., ‘The relative Riemann–Roch theorem from Hochschild homology’, New York Journal of Mathematics 14 (2008), 643717.Google Scholar
Rydh, D., ‘Compactification of tame Deligne–Mumford stacks’, 2011, https://people.kth.se/~dary/tamecompactification20110517.pdf.Google Scholar
Segal, E., ‘The closed state space of affine Landau–Ginzburg B-models’, J. Noncommut. Geom. 7(3) (2013), 857883.Google Scholar
Shklyarov, D., ‘Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch-type formula for DG algebras’, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 106(1) (2013), 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, M., ‘Functorial desingularization of quasi-excellent schemes in characteristic zero: the nonembedded case’, Duke Math. J. 161(11) (2012), 22072254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toën, B., ‘Théorémes de Riemann–Roch pour les champs de Deligne-Mumford’, K-Theory, 18(1) (1999), 3376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totaro, B., ‘The resolution property for schemes and stacks’, J. Reine Angew. Math. 577 (2004), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vistoli, A., ‘Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and on their moduli spaces’, Invent. Math. 97(3) (1989), 613670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, C., ‘An Introduction to Homological Algebra’, No. 38 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar