Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T16:32:10.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The possible role of selenium status in adverse pregnancy outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Aline B. Mariath
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Denise P. Bergamaschi*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Patrícia H. C. Rondó
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Ana C. D'A. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal-Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Patrícia de Fragas Hinnig
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Joélcio F. Abbade
Affiliation:
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Simone G. Diniz
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal-Child Health, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: D. P. Bergamaschi, fax +55 11 30812108, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study reviews the possible role of Se status during pregnancy regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, with emphasis on those related to diminished antioxidant activity and increased oxidative stress. Studies have reported that Se could play an important role in adverse outcomes such as miscarriages, neural tube defects, diaphragmatic hernia, premature birth, low birth weight, pre-eclampsia, glucose intolerance and gestational diabetes. Also, low Se status has been associated with adverse outcomes among HIV-infected pregnant women and their offspring. Nevertheless, the function of Se in the aetiology of pregnancy complications is yet to be elucidated. Available evidence presents the following limitations: most study designs do not allow conclusions about causal relationships; study populations, selection of subjects, research setting, procedures for defining sample size and analytical methods are often poorly described; many studies fail to adjust for important confounding variables. In addition, population studies assessing the relationship between Se intake during pregnancy and health outcomes are scarce. Further research is still needed to clarify the role of Se status in adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially those related to augmented oxidative stress.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

It is well recognised that maternal nutritional conditions during pregnancy can have a profound and long-lasting effect not only on women's health status but also on fetal, newborn and infant health, development and well-being(Reference Rondó, Abbott and Rodrigues1Reference Hong, Park and Kim3).

During pregnancy, there can be a reduction in maternal Se concentrations, regardless of whether there are any gestational complications(Reference Perona, Guidi and Piga4Reference Pinheiro, Müller and Sarkis9). Such reduction could be explained by haemodilution caused by maternal plasma expansion(Reference Ferrer, Alegría and Barberá10, Reference Kantola, Purkunen and Kroger11), or it could reflect transport of Se to the fetus(Reference Kantola, Purkunen and Kroger11). It has also been hypothesised that during this period, higher amounts of Se are used for producing antioxidant compounds such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and selenoprotein P(Reference Mihailović, Cvetković and Ljubić12).

Se, a mineral with well-known antioxidant activity that participates in the synthesis of selenoproteins, such as GPx, selenoprotein P and thioredoxin reductase, could have an important role in pregnancy, especially because oxidative stress might be increased during this period(Reference Tapiero, Townsend and Tew13Reference Fialová, Malbohan and Kalousová17). Consequently, antioxidant defences have a central role in modulating events mediated by oxidative stress and could be related to perinatal morbidity and mortality(Reference Orhan, Önderoglu and Yücel18Reference Chen, Scholl and Leskiw22).

In addition, an extensive body of literature has suggested that exacerbated oxidative stress during pregnancy plays an important role in many diseases and adverse pregnancy outcomes, which include miscarriages, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, premature rupture of membranes and intra-uterine growth restriction(Reference Holmes and McCance16, Reference Chen, Scholl and Leskiw22Reference Longini, Perrone and Vezzosi31).

Thus, the objective of the present review is to discuss the possible role of Se status during pregnancy regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, with emphasis on those related to diminished antioxidant activity and increased oxidative stress.

Selenium status and adverse fetal and perinatal outcomes

Barrington et al. (Reference Barrington, Lindsay and James32) observed significantly lower serum Se levels among women who had had a miscarriage in the first trimester of pregnancy than in either pregnant women or non-pregnant healthy volunteers. The authors referred that haemodilution cannot explain the difference in Se levels between these groups, considering that serum albumin and total protein concentrations of the pregnant and miscarried groups were not different. They suggested that low Se status in women with miscarriage could be related to membrane and cell DNA damage caused by loss of the antioxidant activity performed by Se.

Similar results were found by Al-Kunani et al. (Reference Al-Kunani, Knight and Haswell33), who described significantly lower hair Se concentrations in women with recurrent miscarriages when compared with non-pregnant women who had had successful pregnancies. In disagreement is the study carried out by Zachara et al. (Reference Zachara, Dobrzynski and Trafikowska34), who observed no significant differences in whole-blood and plasma Se levels when comparing women with miscarriage against women with normal pregnancies. Nevertheless, these authors found that women with miscarriage had significantly lower erythrocyte and plasma GPx activities than women with normal pregnancies and non-pregnant women.

Reduced Se concentrations also seem to be related to neural tube defects, as reported in some studies. Güvenç et al. (Reference Güvenç, Karatas and Güvenç35) observed low Se status in both mothers and their infants with neural tube defects and suggested that the occurrence of such defects could be related not only to a deficiency of the mineral, but also to inadequate intakes.

Although mechanisms implicated in the prevention of neural tube defects are still unknown, Martin et al. (Reference Martin, Gibert and Pintos36) suggested that in women with low Se status, low levels of folate could worsen oxidative stress, and thus purine and pyrimidine synthesis could be jeopardised.

Cengiz et al. (Reference Cengiz, Soylemez and Ozturk37) and Zeyrek et al. (Reference Zeyrek, Soran and Cakmak38) assessed multiple micronutrients in mothers and their newborns with neural tube defects and found conflicting results regarding Se status. The first study found statistically significant lower maternal Se levels among cases. The second study, on the other hand, found that Se concentrations did not differ between cases and controls. It has also been reported in the literature that low Se intake could be associated with the occurrence of diaphragmatic hernia. Although this finding is supported by a large population-based case–control study(Reference Yang, Shaw and Carmichael39), the authors highlight limitations which include the use of a FFQ for the assessment of nutrient adequacy and the fact that maternal levels of nutrients were not measured. In addition, associations might have been exclusive to a particular nutrient or a consequence of highly correlated nutrients, and because of the elevated number of nutrients investigated, some might have shown statistically significant differences by chance. It is also possible that lack of information from non-participants might have biased the results.

Low Se status could also be related to adverse perinatal outcomes. It has been suggested that newborn Se concentrations may be related to the Se status of their mothers(Reference Dobrzynski, Trafikowska and Trafikowska30, Reference Micetic-Turk, Rossipal and Krachler40, Reference Iranpour, Zandian and Mohammadizadeh41), and that pre-term infants born to healthy women have lower Se concentrations than do term newborns(Reference Iranpour, Zandian and Mohammadizadeh41Reference Nassi, Ponziani and Becatti44). Such findings are not surprising since shortened gestations hinder appropriate transport of Se from the mother to the fetus. In fact, Al-Saleh et al. (Reference Al-Saleh, Al-Doush and Ibrahim42) emphasised that pre-term newborns can be at risk of Se deficiency, especially if total parenteral nutrition is needed. Moreover, as a consequence of their lower Se status, pre-term infants might have their antioxidant defences impaired, especially with respect to GPx activity, a Se-dependent enzyme, which may be related to higher incidence of oxygen dependence at 28 d of life(Reference Nassi, Ponziani and Becatti44, Reference Mentro, Smith and Moyer-Mileur45). There are conflicting results, however, regarding the influence of gestational age on Se concentrations and erythrocyte GPx activity(Reference Dobrzynski, Trafikowska and Trafikowska30, Reference Makhoul, Sammour and Diamond46, Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47).

Dobrzynski et al. (Reference Dobrzynski, Trafikowska and Trafikowska30) have considered a possible relationship between low Se status and premature birth, since pre-term parturient women in their study had lower plasma and blood Se concentrations than did term parturient women and healthy non-pregnant women. In their study, no significant correlations between gestational age and Se status measures were found. The authors also reported that pre-term parturient women had significantly lower antioxidant status when compared with their controls, as indicated by their erythrocyte GPx activity. Nonetheless, this relationship is not supported by other studies(Reference Iranpour, Zandian and Mohammadizadeh41, Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47).

With regard to the relationship between Se status and birth weight, there is still much disagreement in the literature. Although many studies have pointed to a possible association(Reference Kantola, Purkunen and Kroger11, Reference Iranpour, Zandian and Mohammadizadeh41, Reference Al-Saleh, Al-Doush and Ibrahim42, Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47, Reference Kaplec, Cavar and Kasac48), significant results varied according to the groups included or excluded from the analyses or the type of statistical tests applied. For instance, Iranpour et al. (Reference Iranpour, Zandian and Mohammadizadeh41) observed only significant correlations between cord blood Se levels and birth weight when pre-term and term infants were considered together in the analysis; Al-Saleh et al. (Reference Al-Saleh, Al-Doush and Ibrahim42) found only a significant correlation between newborn Se concentrations and birth weight when low-birth-weight infants were included in the analysis; Kaplec et al. (Reference Kaplec, Cavar and Kasac48) found a significant correlation between placental Se concentrations and birth weight among newborns whose birth weight was appropriate for gestational age, but not among intra-uterine growth-restricted newborns; Bogden et al. (Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47) found no significant correlation between birth weight and serum Se as continuous variables, but a significant association was observed when the lowest decile of Se level was compared with the nine highest. In addition, many authors have failed to establish any kind of relationship between Se status and birth weight(Reference Dobrzynski, Trafikowska and Trafikowska30, Reference Makhoul, Sammour and Diamond46, Reference Odland, Nieboer and Romanova49). Bogden et al. (Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47) suggested that conflicting findings could be partly attributed to different timing in blood collection (i.e. early in pregnancy or at delivery), and that the effect of prematurity on birth weight could mask the association between Se levels and birth weight.

Concerning intra-uterine growth restriction, Zadrozna et al. (Reference Zadrozna, Gawlik and Nowak50) found increased Se concentrations in complicated placentas, suggesting a physiological response to maintain GPx activity due to augmented oxidative stress. On the other hand, Kaplec et al. (Reference Kaplec, Cavar and Kasac48) observed that Se levels were not predictors of intra-uterine growth restriction. Their findings are consistent with those of Llanos & Ronco(Reference Llanos and Ronco51), who did not report statistically significant differences between normal-weight neonates and neonates with fetal growth restriction.

The occurrence of adverse outcomes among infants born to HIV-infected mothers might be influenced by maternal Se status: low status has been associated with increased risks of fetal and child deaths, as well as intra-partum and breast-feeding transmission of HIV and lower risk of small-for-gestational age infants. Kupka et al. (Reference Kupka, Garland and Msamanga52) have cited the role of Se in antioxidant defences as one of the factors that might be implicated in fetal deaths. Later, the same group conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Se supplementation to HIV-infected pregnant women and found that the intervention reduced the risk of infant death after 6 weeks, although no significant effects were found regarding the risks of low birth weight, pre-term birth and small-for-gestational age(Reference Kupka, Mugusi and Aboud53).

The main characteristics of studies assessing the relationship between Se status and the occurrence of adverse fetal outcomes are shown in Table 1, whereas Table 2 summarises the characteristics of studies which investigated the relationship between Se status and adverse perinatal outcomes.

Table 1 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse fetal outcomes

CS, cross-sectional; CC, case–control; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; NTD, neural tube defect.

Table 2 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse perinatal outcomes

CS, cross-sectional; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; TPW, term parturient women; PPW, pre-term parturient women; NPW, non-pregnant women; TB, term babies; PB, pre-term babies; L*, longitudinal (including cohort and follow-up studies); ELBW, extremely low birth weight; NCC, nested case–control; IUGR, intra-uterine growth restriction.

Selenium status and adverse maternal outcomes

There is evidence that maternal plasma Se concentrations are reduced in the presence of pre-eclampsia(Reference Atamer, Koçyigit and Yokus54, Reference Mistry, Wilson and Ramsay55). Lower Se levels have been reported in the amniotic fluid of pre-eclamptic pregnant women compared with their normotensive controls(Reference Dawson, Evans and Nosovitch56) and infants born to pre-eclamptic women have shown lower umbilical cord blood Se levels than infants born to normotensive pregnant women(Reference Mistry, Wilson and Ramsay55). Decreased GPx activity has also been observed in pre-eclamptic pregnancies(Reference Mistry, Wilson and Ramsay55). Rayman et al. (Reference Rayman, Bode and Redman57) suggested that Se deficiency before the onset of pre-eclampsia might be related to the incidence of the disease, although they speculated that the same association might not be found in populations with adequate Se status. Despite the body of evidence pointing to an association between Se status and pre-eclampsia, some studies have failed to find the same results(Reference Roy, Ratnam and Karunanithy58Reference Mahomed, Williams and Woelk60).

Not only can serum Se levels be reduced in the presence of abnormal glucose metabolism and gestational diabetes(Reference Tan, Sheng and Qian6, Reference Bo, Lezo and Menato61, Reference Kilinc, Guven and Ezer62), but inadequate dietary Se intake has also been related to these conditions. Bo et al. (Reference Bo, Lezo and Menato61) reported significantly lower Se intake in hyperglycaemic pregnant women, even after adjustment for confounders such as age, gestational age, familial diabetes, pre-pregnancy BMI and total energy intake. However, associations between maternal Se levels and outcomes such as the percentages of caesarean sections, small- or large-for-gestational age newborns, pre-term births and neonatal morbidities have not been found. Taking these results into account, Kilinc et al. (Reference Kilinc, Guven and Ezer62) suggested that Se status is important to glucose-intolerant individuals, and that its deficiency could aggravate diabetes and be related to complications in the gestational period. In addition, Bo et al. (Reference Bo, Lezo and Menato61) proposed that dietary counselling and antioxidant supplementation might be useful if further research confirms the relationship between micronutrient status and hyperglycaemia.

Finally, low Se status of HIV-infected pregnant women has been related to increased risk of mortality, whereas high Se status has been associated with higher CD4 cell count in the first years of follow-up in the cohort study by Kupka et al. (Reference Kupka, Msamanga and Spiegelman63). However, in the Se supplementation study conducted by the same group and previously cited in the present paper, the intervention had no statistically significant effects on CD4, CD8 and CD3 cell counts, viral load or maternal mortality(Reference Kupka, Mugusi and Aboud53).

The main characteristics of studies assessing the relationship between low Se status and adverse maternal outcomes are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse maternal outcomes

CS, cross-sectional; CC, case–control; GD, gestational diabetes; GI, glucose intolerance; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; HPW, healthy pregnant women; L*, longitudinal (including cohort and follow-up studies); NPW, non-pregnant women.

Limitations of available evidence

It must be emphasised that the role of Se status in the aetiology of pregnancy complications is yet to be established. Although a connection between low Se status and the occurrence of adverse fetal outcomes has been suggested, because most available studies are cross-sectional or case–control, their results are not appropriate to the assessment of causal relationships. Thus, low Se status could either be implicated in the causal process of such adverse outcomes or simply indicate a maternal physiological response to increased oxidative stress states. Ideally, high-quality prospective studies assessing the Se status of women through the periconceptional period to pregnancy loss or detection of any adverse outcome should be carried out, but such type of design is not always feasible.

Additionally, some studies have limitations that should be noted and addressed in future research, which comprise a comprehensive description of study populations (including their Se status), selection of subjects, research setting and analytical methods poorly described. The lack of such type of information limits generalisation of study results. Also, most studies fail to present the procedures for defining sample sizes, thus making it difficult to judge their statistical power, especially because many studies have small sample sizes.

Among important confounding variables, which should be taken into account but are not frequently assessed, are maternal Se intake, parity and smoking habits. Maternal nutrient intake assessment as a whole is essential since it can also be hypothesised that Se-deficient women lack other micronutrients, and thus Se deficiency itself might not explain adverse fetal outcomes. Indeed, Bogden et al. (Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47) suggested that the association between serum Se and birth weight in neonates could simply reflect good maternal nutritional status. Parity could contribute not only to low Se status but also to other micronutrient deficiencies, which could also influence pregnancy outcomes. Smoking should also be included in the analyses since it induces oxidative stress and consequently activates antioxidant defence mechanisms(Reference Kantola, Purkunen and Kroger11, Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47). In addition, cigarettes might contain Se, which could also interfere in maternal Se status. Bogden et al. (Reference Bogden, Kemp and Chen47) highlighted the fact that most studies do not control for this variable, which can hinder possible associations between Se measurements and pregnancy outcomes.

Finally, even though there is evidence suggesting that Se status might be important in relation to the occurrence of gestational morbidities, large representative population studies assessing the relationship between Se intake during pregnancy and maternal and newborn health outcomes are still scarce.

Conclusion

Although Se status might play an important role in adverse pregnancy outcomes, probably because of its participation in the antioxidant defence system as GPx, not enough evidence has been produced so far to form a comprehensive understanding of the role of Se. Further research with bigger sample sizes, prospective designs and well-documented reports are still needed, allowing greater statistical power and more robust analyses. Ideally, maternal Se and antioxidant status should be assessed from periconceptional through postnatal periods, and a large array of maternal and newborn outcomes should be addressed. Moreover, studies evaluating the relationship between dietary and supplementary Se intake before and during pregnancy in relation to adverse outcomes would be of great importance.

Acknowledgements

All authors have seen and approved the content of the manuscript. A. B. M. developed the initial idea and wrote the manuscript. D. P. B. developed the initial idea, provided academic advice and consultation, and helped writing the manuscript. P. H. C. R., A. C. D'A. T., J. F. A. and S. G. D. provided academic advice and consultation, and participated in the elaboration of the manuscript. P. F. H. participated in the elaboration of the manuscript. A. B. M. and P. F. H. received studentships from the Brazilian Government (CAPES – Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior). The authors have no financial or personal conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

1 Rondó, PH, Abbott, R, Rodrigues, LC, et al. (1997) The influence of maternal nutritional factors on intrauterine growth retardation in Brazil. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 11, 152166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Allen, LH (2005) Multiple micronutrients in pregnancy and lactation: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 1206S1212S.Google Scholar
3 Hong, J, Park, EA, Kim, YJ, et al. (2007) Association of antioxidant vitamins and oxidative stress levels in pregnancy with infant growth during the first year of life. Public Health Nutr 11, 9981005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Perona, G, Guidi, GC, Piga, A, et al. (1979) Neonatal erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase deficiency as a consequence of selenium imbalance during pregnancy. Br J Haematol 42, 567574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Gromadzinska, J, Wasovicz, W, Krasomski, G, et al. (1998) Selenium levels, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance concentrations and glutathione peroxidase activity in the blood of women with gestosis and imminent premature labour. Analyst 123, 3540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Tan, M, Sheng, L, Qian, Y, et al. (2001) Changes of serum selenium in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Biol Trace Elem Res 83, 231237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Wasowicz, W, Gromadzinska, J, Rydzynski, K, et al. (2003) Selenium status of low-selenium area residents: Polish experience. Toxicol Lett 137, 95101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 McLachlan, SK, Thomson, CD, Ferguson, EL, et al. (2004) Dietary and biochemical selenium status of urban 6- to 24-month-old South Island New Zealand children and their postpartum mothers. J Nutr 134, 32903295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Pinheiro, MC, Müller, RC, Sarkis, JE, et al. (2005) Mercury and selenium concentrations in hair samples of women in fertile age from Amazon riverside communities. Sci Total Environ 349, 284288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Ferrer, E, Alegría, A, Barberá, R, et al. (1999) Whole blood selenium content in pregnant women. Sci Total Environ 227, 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Kantola, M, Purkunen, R, Kroger, P, et al. (2004) Selenium in pregnancy: is selenium an active defective ion against environmental chemical stress? Environ Res 96, 5161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Mihailović, M, Cvetković, M, Ljubić, A, et al. (2000) Selenium and malondialdehyde content and glutathione peroxidase activity in maternal and umbilical cord blood and amniotic fluid. Biol Trace Elem Res 73, 4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Tapiero, H, Townsend, DM & Tew, KD (2003) The antioxidant role of selenium and seleno-compounds. Biomed Pharmacother 57, 134144.Google Scholar
14 Lei, XG, Cheng, WH & McClung, JP (2007) Metabolic regulation and function of glutathione peroxidase-1. Annu Rev Nutr 27, 4161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Navarro-Alarcon, M & Cabrera-Vique, C (2008) Selenium in food and the human body: a review. Sci Total Environ 400, 115141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Holmes, VA & McCance, DR (2005) Could antioxidant supplementation prevent pre-eclampsia? Proc Nutr Soc 64, 491501.Google Scholar
17 Fialová, L, Malbohan, I, Kalousová, M, et al. (2006) Oxidative stress and inflammation in pregnancy. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 66, 121127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Orhan, H, Önderoglu, L, Yücel, A, et al. (2003) Circulating biomarkers of oxidative stress in complicated pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267, 189195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Dennery, PA (2007) Effects of oxidative stress on embryonic development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 81, 155162.Google Scholar
20 Karowicz-Bilinska, A, Kedziora-Kornattowska, K & Barstosz, G (2007) Indices of oxidative stress in pregnancy with fetal growth restriction. Free Radic Res 41, 870873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Hracsko, Z, Orvos, H, Novak, Z, et al. (2008) Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in neonates with intra-uterine growth retardation. Redox Rep 13, 1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Chen, X, Scholl, TO, Leskiw, MJ, et al. (2008) Association of glutathione peroxidase activity with insulin resistance and dietary fat intake during normal pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88, 59635968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Tastekin, A, Ors, R, Demircan, B, et al. (2005) Oxidative stress in infants born to preeclamptic mothers. Pediatr Int 47, 658662.Google Scholar
24 Janiaux, E, Poston, L & Burton, GJ (2006) Placental-related diseases of pregnancy: involvement of oxidative stress and implications in human evolution. Hum Reprod Update 12, 747755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Mehendale, S, Kilari, A, Dangat, K, et al. (2008) Fatty acids, antioxidants, and oxidative stress in pre-eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100, 234238.Google Scholar
26 Chamy, VM, Lepe, J, Catalán, A, et al. (2006) Oxidative stress is closely related to clinical severity of pre-eclampsia. Biol Res 39, 229236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Grissa, O, Atègbo, JM, Yessoufou, A, et al. (2007) Antioxidant status and circulating lipids are altered in human gestational diabetes and macrosomia. Transl Res 150, 164171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Biri, A, Onan, A, Devrim, E, et al. (2006) Oxidant status in maternal and cord plasma and placental tissue in gestational diabetes. Placenta 27, 327332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Surapaneni, KM (2007) Oxidant–antioxidant status in gestational diabetes patients. J Clin Diag Res 1, 235238.Google Scholar
30 Dobrzynski, W, Trafikowska, U, Trafikowska, A, et al. (1998) Decreased selenium concentration in maternal and cord blood in preterm compared with term delivery. Analyst 123, 9397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Longini, M, Perrone, S, Vezzosi, P, et al. (2007) Association between oxidative stress in pregnancy and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Clin Biochem 40, 793797.Google Scholar
32 Barrington, JW, Lindsay, P, James, D, et al. (1996) Selenium deficiency and miscarriage: a possible link? Br J Obst Gynecol 103, 130132.Google Scholar
33 Al-Kunani, AS, Knight, R, Haswell, SJ, et al. (2001) The selenium status of women with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Br J Obst Gynecol 108, 10941097.Google Scholar
34 Zachara, BA, Dobrzynski, W, Trafikowska, U, et al. (2001) Blood selenium and glutathione peroxidase in miscarriage. Br J Obst Gynecol 108, 244247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Güvenç, H, Karatas, F, Güvenç, M, et al. (1995) Low levels of selenium in mothers and their newborns in pregnancies with a neural tube defect. Pediatrics 95, 879882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Martin, I, Gibert, MJ, Pintos, C, et al. (2004) Oxidative stress in mothers who have conceived fetus with neural tube defects: the role of aminothiols and selenium. Clin Nutr 23, 507514.Google Scholar
37 Cengiz, B, Soylemez, F, Ozturk, E, et al. (2004) Serum zinc, selenium, copper, and lead levels in women with second-trimester induced abortion resulting from neural tube defects. Biol Trace Elem Res 97, 225235.Google Scholar
38 Zeyrek, D, Soran, M, Cakmak, A, et al. (2009) Serum copper and zinc levels in mothers and cord blood of their newborn infants with neural tube defects: a case–control study. Indian Pediatr 46, 665667.Google ScholarPubMed
39 Yang, W, Shaw, GM, Carmichael, SL, et al. (2008) Nutrient intakes in women and congenital diaphragmatic hernia in their offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82, 131138.Google Scholar
40 Micetic-Turk, D, Rossipal, E, Krachler, M, et al. (2000) Maternal selenium status in Slovenia and its impact on the selenium concentration of umbilical cord serum and colostrum. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 522524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Iranpour, R, Zandian, A, Mohammadizadeh, M, et al. (2009) Comparison of maternal and umbilical cord blood selenium levels in term and preterm infants. Clin J Contemp Pediatr 11, 513516.Google Scholar
42 Al-Saleh, I, Al-Doush, I, Ibrahim, M, et al. (1998) Serum selenium levels in Saudi newborns. Int J Environ Health Res 8, 269275.Google Scholar
43 Galinier, A, Périquet, B, Lambert, W, et al. (2005) Reference range for micronutrients and nutritional marker proteins in cord blood of neonates appropriated for gestational ages. Early Hum Dev 81, 583593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44 Nassi, N, Ponziani, V, Becatti, M, et al. (2009) Anti-oxidant enzymes and related elements in term and preterm newborns. Pediatr Int 51, 183187.Google Scholar
45 Mentro, AM, Smith, A & Moyer-Mileur, L (2005) Plasma and erythrocyte selenium and glutathione peroxidase activity in preterm infants at risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Biol Trace Elem Res 106, 97106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Makhoul, IR, Sammour, RN, Diamond, E, et al. (2004) Selenium concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood at 24–42 weeks of gestation: basis for optimization of selenium supplementation to premature infants. Clin Nutr 23, 373381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Bogden, JD, Kemp, FW, Chen, X, et al. (2006) Low-normal serum selenium early in human pregnancy predicts lower birth weight. Nutr Res 26, 497502.Google Scholar
48 Kaplec, T, Cavar, S, Kasac, Z, et al. (2008) Selenium in placenta predicts birth weight in normal but not intrauterine growth restriction pregnancy. J Trace Elem Med Biol 22, 5458.Google Scholar
49 Odland, JO, Nieboer, E, Romanova, N, et al. (1999) Concentrations of essential trace elements in maternal serum and the effect on birth weight and newborn body mass index in sub-arctic and arctic populations of Norway and Russia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78, 605614.Google ScholarPubMed
50 Zadrozna, M, Gawlik, M, Nowak, B, et al. (2009) Antioxidants activities and concentration of selenium, zinc and copper in preterm and IUGR placentas. J Trace Elem Med Biol 23, 144148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51 Llanos, MN & Ronco, AM (2009) Fetal growth restriction is related to placental levels of cadmium, lead and arsenic but not with antioxidant activities. Reprod Toxicol 27, 8892.Google Scholar
52 Kupka, R, Garland, M, Msamanga, G, et al. (2005) Selenium status, pregnancy outcomes, and mother-to-child trasmission of HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 39, 203210.Google Scholar
53 Kupka, R, Mugusi, F, Aboud, S, et al. (2008) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of selenium supplements among HIV-infected pregnant women in Tanzania: effects on maternal and child outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 18021808.Google Scholar
54 Atamer, Y, Koçyigit, Y, Yokus, B, et al. (2005) Lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense, status of trace metals and leptin levels in preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 119, 6066.Google Scholar
55 Mistry, HD, Wilson, V, Ramsay, M, et al. (2008) Reduced selenium concentrations and glutathione peroxidase activity in preeclamptic pregnancies. Hypertension 52, 881888.Google Scholar
56 Dawson, EB, Evans, DR & Nosovitch, J (1999) Third-trimester amniotic fluid metal levels associated with preeclampsia. Arch Environ Health 54, 412415.Google Scholar
57 Rayman, MP, Bode, P & Redman, CWG (2003) Low selenium status is associated with the occurrence of the pregnancy disease preeclampsia in women in the United Kingdom. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189, 13431349.Google Scholar
58 Roy, AC, Ratnam, SS & Karunanithy, R (1989) Amniotic fluid selenium status in pre-eclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 28, 161162.Google Scholar
59 Poranen, AK, Ekblad, U, Uotila, P, et al. (1996) Lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in normal and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Placenta 17, 401405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 Mahomed, K, Williams, MA, Woelk, GB, et al. (2000) Leukocyte selenium, zinc, and copper concentrations in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. Biol Trace Elem Res 75, 107118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61 Bo, S, Lezo, A, Menato, G, et al. (2005) Gestational hyperglycemia, zinc, selenium, and antioxidant vitamins. Nutrition 21, 186191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62 Kilinc, M, Guven, MA, Ezer, M, et al. (2008) Evaluation of serum selenium levels in Turkish women with gestational diabetes mellitus, glucose intolerants, and normal controls. Biol Trace Elem Res 123, 3540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
63 Kupka, R, Msamanga, G, Spiegelman, D, et al. (2004) Selenium status is associated with accelerated HIV disease progression among HIV-1-infected pregnant women in Tanzania. J Nutr 134, 25562560.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse fetal outcomes

Figure 1

Table 2 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse perinatal outcomes

Figure 2

Table 3 Main characteristics and results of studies assessing the relationship between selenium status and adverse maternal outcomes