Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:09:27.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of Salmonella enterica in Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) of Chilean Patagonia: evidences of inter-species transmission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2014

C. DOUGNAC
Affiliation:
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Silvoagropecuarias y Veterinarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
C. PARDO
Affiliation:
Programa de Magister en Ciencias Animales y Veterinarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
K. MEZA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, FAVET, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
C. ARREDONDO
Affiliation:
Programa de Magister en Ciencias Animales y Veterinarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
O. BLANK
Affiliation:
Centro de rehabilitación de aves Leñadura, Punta Arenas, Chile
P. ABALOS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, FAVET, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Emerging and Re-emerging Zoonoses Research Network, Santiago, Chile
R. VIDAL
Affiliation:
Emerging and Re-emerging Zoonoses Research Network, Santiago, Chile Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
A. FERNANDEZ
Affiliation:
Instituto de Salud Pública, Ministerio de Salud, Santiago, Chile
F. FREDES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, FAVET, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Emerging and Re-emerging Zoonoses Research Network, Santiago, Chile
P. RETAMAL*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, FAVET, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Emerging and Re-emerging Zoonoses Research Network, Santiago, Chile
*
* Author for correspondence: Dr P. Retamal, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva Animal, FAVET, Universidad de Chile, Av. Sta Rosa 11735, Santiago, 8820808Chile. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Patagonia in southern South America is among the few world regions where direct human impact is still limited but progressively increasing, mainly represented by tourism, farming, fishing and mining activities. The sanitary condition of Patagonian wildlife is unknown, in spite of being critical for the assessment of anthropogenic effects there. The aim of this study was the characterization of Salmonella enterica strains isolated from wild colonies of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) located in Magdalena Island and Otway Sound, in Chilean Patagonia. Eight isolates of Salmonella were found, belonging to Agona and Enteritidis serotypes, with an infection rate of 0·38%. Resistance to ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftiofur and tetracycline antimicrobials were detected, and some of these strains showed genotypic similarity with Salmonella strains isolated from humans and gulls, suggesting inter-species transmission cycles and strengthening the role of penguins as sanitary sentinels in the Patagonian ecosystem.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

INTRODUCTION

Penguins are long-lived aquatic birds exclusively distributed in the Southern hemisphere and are catalogued as marine sentinels of the ocean's health. This condition has been established, among other reasons, due to their large land breeding colonies [Reference Boersma1], and being totally dependent on marine resources [Reference Trivelpiece2]. Therefore their population alterations reflect the regional oceanic variations more accurately and faster than any other aquatic bird [Reference Boersma1].

The Spheniscus genus includes four species which inhabit the coastal areas from the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) is distributed in southern South America, including Chile and Argentina. It is the most abundant temperate penguin in the world [Reference Boersma1], although with a declining population that has caused its ‘Near Threatened’ classification by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature [3]. During the reproductive season (spring and summer) it is possible to observe colonies from 30° S in the Pacific and 42° S in the Atlantic coasts. In winter, birds migrate to Brazil, South Atlantic Islands, New Zealand and Australia [Reference Miranda4].

It has been assumed that emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) constitute an unpredictable phenomenon associated with global changes largely influenced by anthropogenic effects on the environment, hosts and pathogens [Reference Rhyan and Spraker5]. In this scenario, penguins are seriously exposed due to resource competition with commercial fisheries and the progressive human invasion of their habitats through population growth and development, including livestock, mining and touristic activities. In addition, the contamination of rivers and oceans with sewage and fishery processing waste predisposes contact with biological agents, threatening the sanitary condition and conservation status of penguins [Reference Boersma1]. This situation is particularly important for temperate penguins like S. magellanicus in Chilean Patagonia, which are a tourist attraction, increasing the direct and indirect interaction with visitors, domestic animals and their transmissible pathogens.

Worldwide, the need for active surveillance of wildlife-borne pathogens has been recognized, focusing these efforts on prioritized agents. Salmonella enterica has been considered within this group, being associated with both water and wildlife [Reference Humblet6, Reference Tavernier7]. Within the World Health Organization (WHO) Event Management System, salmonellosis is classified as a communicable disease common to humans and animals related to food safety, with transmission through the food chain and water supply [Reference Schneider8]. In developed and developing countries, Salmonella constitutes an endemic foodborne infection that generates periodic outbreaks in the human population and is considered of great concern for animal health [Reference Tavernier7, Reference Cardoen9, Reference Hendriksen10]. The most frequent Salmonella serovars isolated from wild birds (mainly aquatic birds) are S. enterica Typhimurium and S. enterica Enteritidis [Reference Hubalek11Reference Pennycott, Park and Mather13]. Although in most cases the infection is asymptomatic, these serovars have been associated with disease outbreaks and high mortality [Reference Hubalek11, Reference Hall and Saito14Reference Reed16], with reports evidencing a direct transmission of Salmonella from wild birds to humans and other animals [Reference Dhama, Mahendran and Tomar17Reference Reche19].

The aim of this work was to detect S. enterica serovars in faecal samples of free-ranging Magellanic penguins from two colonies in Chilean Patagonia. The isolates were characterized by serotyping, antimicrobial susceptibility and genotyping.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study area

During January and February in 2012 and 2013, samples from S. magellanicus located in Magdalena Island (52° 55′ S, 70° 34′ W) and Otway Sound (52° 58′ S, 71° 13′ W), in southern Chilean Patagonia were collected. For this work, authorization for sampling activities were obtained from the official authority in Magdalena Island and from farm owners in Otway Sound. Additionally, authorizations from Bioethics and Biosecurity Committees of the University of Chile were also obtained.

Sampling

A total of 2114 faecal samples (Table 1) were collected through both environmental and cloacal swabbing. Swabs were placed into Cary–Blair transport medium (Copan, USA) and stored under refrigeration for up to 4 weeks until arrival at the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, University of Chile, Santiago.

Table 1. Salmonella strains isolated from Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus)

AMP, Ampicillin; CTX, cefotaxime; EFT, ceftiofur; TE, tetracycline.

Penguins were captured using a net, following recommendations of Chilean authorities and the Global Penguin Society. In order to avoid breeding interference, only adult animals ranging outside nests were manipulated. Once cloacal swabbing and morphological data collection was completed, the animals were identified by a web tag (National Band and Tag Co. model no. 1005–1) as described previously [Reference Boersma and Rebstock20], and then released in the same place as captured.

Bacterial isolates

To isolate bacteria, swabs were placed into 5 ml buffered peptone water (Difco APT broth, Beckton Dickinson, USA) supplemented with 20 μg/ml novobiocin (Sigma, USA) [ Reference Jensen 21 ], and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Then, 100 μl of the suspension was inoculated into modified semi-solid Rappaport–Vassiliadis basal medium (Oxoid, Brazil) supplemented with 20 μg/ml novobiocin and incubated for 24 h or 48 h at 41·5 °C. Cultures with growth were plated onto xylose lysine deoxycholate agar (Difco XLD, Beckton Dickinson) and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Suspicious colonies were identified by biochemichal tests and invA gene detection by PCR [Reference Malorny22]. Next, S. enterica strains were serotyped according to the Kauffman–White scheme [Reference Grimont23].

For genotypic comparison, a set of S. enterica strains isolated from poultry and humans in Chile during 2011 and 2012 were also included in the analysis (Fig. 1). Strains from poultry were provided by the Agriculture and Livestock Service (SAG) and strains from humans by the Institute of Public Health (ISP). A S. enterica Agona strain previously isolated from a Kelp gull (Larus dominicanus) [Reference Fresno24] was also included.

Genotyping

Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE was performed according to the standard protocol recommended by PulseNet (http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/index.html). Briefly, the digestion was made using XbaI (Invitrogen, USA). Electrophoresis was performed using the CHEF DRIII PFGE system (Bio-Rad, USA). The conditions used were 6 V/cm for 21 h at 14 °C with pulse time ranging from 3 to 63 s. As control, S. Braenderup H9812 strain was used. The gels were analysed with GEL COMPAR II® software (Applied Maths, Belgium).

Virulotyping

This procedure was made by PCR amplification of pefA, spvC, sirA, gipA, SEN1417, trhH and prot6e virulence genes, using primers pefA_F (5′-cctgtgacctgaccacttctg-3′), pefA_R (5′-gtaagccactgcgaaagatg-3′), spvC_F (5′-ctccttgcacaaccaaatgcg-3′), spvC_R (5′-tgtctctgcatttcaccaccatc-3′), sirA_F (5′-tgcgcctggtgacaaaactg-3′), sirA_R (5′-actgacttcccaggctacagca-3′), gipA_F (5′-acgactgagcaggctgag-3′), gipA_R (5′-ttggaaatggtgacggtagac-3′), sen1417_F (5′-gatcgctggctggtc-3′), sen1417_R (5′-ctgaccgtaatggcga-3′), trhH_F(5′-aactggtgccgttgtcattg-3′), trhH_R (5′-gatggtctgtgcttgctgag-3′), prot6e_F (5′-gcctaaggttagtgtgactctc-3′) and prot6e_R (5′-ctagcagccgttggtatcc-3′). The DNA extraction, reaction mixtures and PCR conditions were developed as described previously [Reference Fresno24]. The S. enterica Typhimurium ATCC 14028 and S. enterica Agona SARB1 strains were used as positive controls.

Antimicrobial resistance phenotypes

Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by the disc diffusion method following CLSI criteria [25]. Antimicrobials tested were (μg/disk) ampicillin (10), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (20/10), cefotaxime (30), gentamicin (10), trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (1·25/23·75), tetracycline (30), ciprofloxacin (5), cefradine (30), ceftiofur (30) and enrofloxacin (10) (Oxoid). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control strain.

Statistical analyses

Categorical data analyses were made through contingency tables with Infostat (2010v) software (http://www.infostat.com.ar/) using Pearson's correlation coefficient to determine differences (P < 0·05).

Results from PFGE and PCR were merged by transforming data in a binary code, using 1 when the character was present (PFGE fragment or PCR gene detection) or 0 when it was absent. The similarity of the strains was calculated according to the Dice coefficient with a 1% tolerance in band position, and the dendogram was constructed using the UPGMA method with TREECON software [Reference Van de Peer and De Wachter26].

RESULTS

Three S. enterica Agona and five S. enterica Enteritidis strains were isolated, with an overall infection rate of 0·38%. The detection of these serotypes suggest differences according to sampling region and year (Table 1), because Enteritidis strains were only detected in Otway Sound, and Agona strains only in 2012. In addition, phenotypes of resistance against ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftiofur and tetracycline were detected (Table 1). Resistances to ceftiofur and tetracycline were associated (P < 0·05) with Agona and Enteritidis strains, respectively.

The PFGE assay classified the strains in two main clusters, in accordance with their serotypes, with less than 60% similarity between them (Fig. 1). When the PFGE and PCR results were merged (Fig. 2), these major groups were maintained and discrimination improved marginally, with some strains changing from identical patterns to having minor differences (less than 10%) within sub-clusters. Within the two sub-clusters of the S. enterica Enteritidis group, all penguin isolates were distinguishable from strains belonging to other hosts. However, similarities were ⩾95%, suggesting genetically close Salmonella strains. Within the S. enterica Agona group, strains from humans were clearly differentiated from the others, and one penguin's isolate (S. enterica Agona 6) had an identical pattern with a gull's strain (S. enterica Agona 2). When comparing serotypes, a higher genotypic variability in S. enterica Agona strains was found (Figs 1 and 2) compared to the S. enterica Enteritidis group.

Fig. 1. Dendogram showing genetic similarities (%) between Salmonella enterica strains resulting from PFGE assay after digestion with XbaI. The tree was constructed using the Dice coefficient and UPGMA algorithm with Gel Compar software (Applied Maths, Belgium).

Fig. 2. Dendogram showing genetic similarities (%) between Salmonella enterica strains resulting from merged PFGE and PCR data. Detection of virulence-associated genes is depicted as grey squares when present. Virulotypes are indicated by letters according to their frequencies (A:8, B:4, C to E:2, F to H:1). Results from PFGE and PCR were transformed into a binary code, using 1 when the character was present (PFGE fragment or PCR gene detection) and 0 when absent. The tree was constructed using the UPGMA method with TREECON software.

DISCUSSION

It is now estimated that 70–80% of emerging infectious diseases (EID) in humans have an animal component in their transmission, and more than half of these have been elicited from wildlife [Reference Jones27]. Moreover, the most common cause of EID in wildlife is the human introduction of pathogens in wild environments [Reference Gilbert, Slingenbergh and Xiao28, Reference Greger29], among which S. enterica is within the group of pathogens that deserve more attention for surveillance [Reference Tavernier7].

The presence of Salmonella in penguins has been reported in Pygoscelis adeliae from the Antarctic continent, including serotypes Blockley, Panama and Infantis with an overall infection rate of 13%. Other studies have reported Salmonella infection in P. papua, with serotypes Enteritidis, Havana and Typhimurium, with isolation rates ranging between 3% and 44% [Reference Dimitrov, Metcheva and Kenarova30, Reference Olsen31]. These works, with an overall 108 positive samples, suggest that P. papua could be a major reservoir of the bacterium in Antarctica, contrasting with penguin species Aptenodytes forsteri and Eudyptes chrysolophus that were also sampled without any detection [Reference Palmgren32, Reference Oelke and Steiniger33]. In this study we detected a very low occurrence of Salmonella infection in S. magellanicus (0·38%), with technical, geographical and host-related factors that could explain this contrasting result. Nonetheless, reports made from one penguin species cannot be extrapolated to others, which is also supported by a recent description of large variation within the faecal microbiota of different penguin species, a finding that includes bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and several known human pathogens [Reference Dewar34].

This is the first report of Salmonella infection in free-ranging penguins from South America, and the first description of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes among these isolates. However, a previous work has already shown tetracycline and ampicillin antibiotic resistance in enteric non-pathogenic microorganisms isolated from penguin faecal samples collected near human settlements in Antarctica [Reference Miller, Gammon and Day35]. This finding, and the fact that tetracycline and ampicillin correspond to widely used antimicrobials in humans, livestock and poultry [Reference Benacer36], suggest that these bacterial phenotypes in penguins, which inhabit pristine environments, could be a measure of the anthropogenic effect. However, whether penguins are directly or indirectly being affected by these human footprints is unknown, since other seabirds in Chile have also been reported to harbour Salmonella strains with these and other antimicrobial resistance phenotypes [Reference Fresno24]. This hypothetical inter-species transmission gains support with our genotypic results, in which one S. enterica Agona strain isolated from a Kelp gull on the Chilean coast, had the same pattern as a penguin isolate (Figs 1 and 2). Furthermore, all S. enterica Enteritidis strains isolated from penguins showed high genetic similarity with other human and poultry isolates (Fig. 2), representing additional evidences of close bacterial transmission cycles among hosts.

The analysis based on merged PFGE and PCR results has clearly discriminated bacteria according to their serotypes. The contrasting strains' diversity at the sub-cluster level is in agreement with the relative higher clonality that has been reported for S. enterica Enteritidis strains compared to other serotypes [Reference Thong37, Reference Zheng38].

On the other hand, the SEN1417 factor has been identified as a putative ABC transporter protein, which gene is inserted within an unstable chromosomal segment that has been exclusively detected in prevalent phage types isolated from humans and animals [Reference Pan39]. In this study, this sequence was detected in all S. enterica strains isolated during 2012 and none from 2013. Whether this is by coincidence or bacterial evolution remains unknown and should be elucidated in the future.

In Chilean Patagonia, there are wild colonies of S. magellanicus neighbouring urban zones with high tourist activity, which increases in the summer during the reproductive period of the animals. It has been calculated that almost 3 00 000 people per year, from all over the world, visit the studied region. However, other activities such as mining, animal husbandry and maritime traffic have been developed near penguins' habitats. The fact that reported Enteritidis and Agona serotypes are among the top five most common zoonotic serotypes isolated from humans in the South American region [Reference Hendriksen10], along with the antimicrobial resistance phenotypes (Table 1) and genotypic similarities detected (Figs 1 and 2), constitute suggestive evidence that penguins have been exposed to human influence in Patagonia. Further efforts are required to characterize the real magnitude of this phenomenon, the temporal and geographical fluctuations of Salmonella in penguin colonies, the sanitary effects on these animals, the involvement of other wildlife and the potential for the emergence of new Salmonella strains. This knowledge will support decisions to preserve the environment and its wildlife in a globally changing scenario.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Claudia Godoy, Rigofredo Veneros and Marcela Fresno for their help during field and laboratory work. We also thank Mary Kalb, for critical review of this paper, and Alda Fernández (Instituto de Salud Pública) for providing Salmonella strains isolated from humans. This work was supported by Fondecyt project 1 110 255 and predoctoral fellowships from CONICYT.

References

REFERENCES

1. Boersma, P. Penguins as marine sentinels. Bioscience 2008; 58: 597607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Trivelpiece, WZ, et al. Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2011; 108: 76257628.Google Scholar
3. IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2013.2 (www.iucnredlist.org). Accessed 22 January 2014.Google Scholar
4. Miranda, M, et al. Breedeing habitat and estimation of population size of the Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus) on rupert island, Francisco Coloane Marine Park, Straits of Magellan. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 2009; 37: 103111.Google Scholar
5. Rhyan, JC, Spraker, TR. Emergence of diseases from wildlife reservoirs. Veterinary Pathology 2010; 47: 3439.Google Scholar
6. Humblet, MF, et al. Multidisciplinary and evidence-based method for prioritizing diseases of food-producing animals and zoonoses. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2012; 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Tavernier, P, et al. Wildtool, a flexible, first-line risk assesment system for wildlife-borne pathogens. Eurpean Journal of Wildlife Research 2011; 57: 10651075.Google Scholar
8. Schneider, MC, et al. Importance of animal/human health interface in potential Public Health Emergencies of International Concern in the Americas. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 2011; 29: 371379.Google Scholar
9. Cardoen, S, et al. Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2009; 6: 10831096.Google Scholar
10. Hendriksen, RS, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2011; 8: 887900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Hubalek, Z. An annotated checklist of pathogenic microorganisms associated with migratory birds. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2004; 40: 639659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Kobayashi, H, et al. Salmonella isolates from cloacal swabs and footpads of wild birds in the immediate environment of Tokyo Bay. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2007; 69: 309311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Pennycott, TW, Park, A, Mather, HA. Isolation of different serovars of Salmonella enterica from wild birds in Great Britain between 1995 and 2003. Veterinary Record 2006; 158: 817820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Hall, AJ, Saito, EK. Avian wildlife mortality events due to salmonellosis in the United States, 1985–2004. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2008; 44: 585593.Google Scholar
15. Hughes, LA, et al. Characterisation of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates from wild birds in northern England from 2005–2006. BMC Veterinary Research 2008; 4: 4.Google Scholar
16. Reed, KD, et al. Birds, migration and emerging zoonoses: West Nile virus, lyme disease, influenza A and enteropathogens. Clinical Medicine & Research 2003; 1: 512.Google Scholar
17. Dhama, K, Mahendran, M, Tomar, S. Pathogens transmitted by migratory birds: threat perceptions to poultry health and production. International Journal of Poultry Science 2008; 7: 516525.Google Scholar
18. Millan, J, et al. Salmonella isolates from wild birds and mammals in the Basque Country (Spain). Scientific and Technical Review 2004; 23: 905911.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Reche, MP, et al. Incidence of salmonellae in captive and wild free-living raptorial birds in central Spain. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. B, Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 2003; 50: 4244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Boersma, P, Rebstock, G. Effects of double bands on Magellanic penguins. Journal of Field Ornithology 2010; 81: 195205.Google Scholar
21. Jensen, AN, et al. Addition of Novobiocin in pre-enrichment step can improve Salmonella culture protocol of modified semisolid Rappaport–Vassiliadis. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2003; 55: 249255 Google Scholar
22. Malorny, B, et al. Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2003; 69: 290296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Grimont, PA, Weill FX. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars, 9th edn. WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella, Institut Pasteur, Paris. (http://www.pasteur.fr/ip/portal/action/WebdriveActionEvent/oid/01-s-000036-089). 2007.Google Scholar
24. Fresno, M, et al. Identification of diverse Salmonella serotypes, virulotypes, and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes in waterfowl From Chile. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 2013; 13: 884887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twentieth informational supplement . M100-S20, 2010; 30: 110.Google Scholar
26. Van de Peer, Y, De Wachter, R. TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 1994; 10: 569570.Google Scholar
27. Jones, KE, et al. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008; 451: 990993.Google Scholar
28. Gilbert, M, Slingenbergh, J, Xiao, X. Climate change and avian influenza. Scientific and Technical Review 2008; 27: 459466.Google ScholarPubMed
29. Greger, M. The human/animal interface: emergence and resurgence of zoonotic infectious diseases. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 2007; 33: 243299.Google Scholar
30. Dimitrov, K, Metcheva, R, Kenarova, A. Salmonella presence- an indicator of direct and indirect human impact on gentoo in Antarctica. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2009; 23: 246249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Olsen, B, et al. Salmonella Enteritidis in Antarctica: zoonosis in man or humanosis in penguins? Lancet 1996; 348: 13191320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Palmgren, H, et al. Salmonella in sub-Antarctica: low heterogeneity in Salmonella serotypes in South Georgian seals and birds. Epidemiology and Infection 2000; 125: 257262.Google Scholar
33. Oelke, H, Steiniger, F. Salmonella in Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) and South Polar Skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) on Ross Island, Antarctica. Avian Diseases 1973; 17: 568573.Google Scholar
34. Dewar, ML, et al. Interspecific variations in the gastrointestinal microbiota in penguins. Microbiology Open 2013; 2: 195204.Google Scholar
35. Miller, RV, Gammon, K, Day, MJ. Antibiotic resistance among bacteria isolated from seawater and penguin fecal samples collected near Palmer Station, Antarctica. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2009; 55: 3745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Benacer, D, et al. Characterization of drug resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium by antibiograms, plasmids, integrons, resistance genes and PFGE. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010; 20: 10421052.Google Scholar
37. Thong, KL, et al. Molecular analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33: 10701074.Google Scholar
38. Zheng, J, et al. Enhanced subtyping scheme for Salmonella Enteritidis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2007; 13: 19321935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Pan, Z, et al. Identification of genetic and phenotypic differences associated with prevalent and non-prevalent Salmonella Enteritidis phage types: analysis of variation in amino acid transport. Microbiology 2009; 155: 32003213.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Salmonella strains isolated from Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Dendogram showing genetic similarities (%) between Salmonella enterica strains resulting from PFGE assay after digestion with XbaI. The tree was constructed using the Dice coefficient and UPGMA algorithm with Gel Compar software (Applied Maths, Belgium).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Dendogram showing genetic similarities (%) between Salmonella enterica strains resulting from merged PFGE and PCR data. Detection of virulence-associated genes is depicted as grey squares when present. Virulotypes are indicated by letters according to their frequencies (A:8, B:4, C to E:2, F to H:1). Results from PFGE and PCR were transformed into a binary code, using 1 when the character was present (PFGE fragment or PCR gene detection) and 0 when absent. The tree was constructed using the UPGMA method with TREECON software.