Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:51:26.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trophic niche overlap among scavengers in Patagonia supports the condor-vulture competition hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

FERNANDO BALLEJO*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Biología de la Conservación, Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA (CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Comahue), Bariloche, Argentina.
SERGIO A. LAMBERTUCCI
Affiliation:
Grupo de Biología de la Conservación, Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA (CONICET, Universidad Nacional del Comahue), Bariloche, Argentina.
ANA TREJO
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Argentina.
LUCIANO J. M. DE SANTIS
Affiliation:
Cátedra de Anatomía Comparada, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Animals that share resources tend to use different foraging strategies in order to decrease potential competition. Scavenging birds using the same nutritional resources can segregate into different space and time scales. However, it has been suggested that when the species do not co-evolve to achieve such segregation competition may result. Our aim was to study the trophic niche overlap between three species of obligate scavengers, the Andean Condor Vultur gryphus, Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura and American Black Vulture Coragyps atratus, which are the main avian consumers of carcasses in north-western Patagonia. Black Vultures arrived in the area relatively recently, have expanded their distribution following human activities, and have been suggested to compete with the threatened condor. We collected pellets in communal roosts of the three species to determine their diet, and to estimate the diversity (Shannon Index) and diet similarity (Pianka overlap index). We found that the Turkey Vulture has greater niche breadth and, apart from domestic livestock, it incorporates smaller items such as fish, reptiles and a great number of birds, carnivores and mice. Although the Black Vulture diet includes arthropods, they feed primarily on introduced ungulates, overlapping more with condor diet when roosting far from urban centres. As these latter two species share the same food resource, human activities that positively affect the abundance of the Black Vulture could increase competition among them, with possible implications for the conservation of the Andean Condor.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © BirdLife International 2017 

Introduction

One of the most important daily challenges that birds must face is the discovery, consumption and use of energy sources. To do so, they must keep a balance between the costs generated to obtain energy and the energy gain (Pianka Reference Pianka1985, Gutiérrez Reference Gutiérrez, Ardila, López, Pérez, Quiñones and Reyes1998). One of the strategies used by animals to reduce the costs of competition is to occupy different ecological niches. In this respect, using different strategies to avoid competition, they differ in what to eat, where to get food and when to seek food. If these strategies overlap, resource competition may occur; this is detrimental for both parties and can eventually trigger the extinction of one of them (Pianka Reference Pianka1985).

Traditionally, food web studies have not considered scavengers (Wilson and Wolkovich Reference Wilson and Wolkovich2011). Carrion is available episodically, as a pulsating resource that can vary seasonally and spatially, playing a dynamic role in the stability of food webs, and the movements and distribution of species that feed on it (Wilson and Wolkovich Reference Wilson and Wolkovich2011, Barton et al. Reference Barton, Cunningham, Lindenmayer and Manning2013). The stable coexistence of different scavengers on the same carcass is only possible if there is a partition of the resource, allowing the different species to be segregated in space and time when they feed from the same source. To maintain coexistence in equilibrium the intervening species may need to adapt anatomically and behaviourally to reduce food-niche overlap (Houston Reference Houston1988, Arjo and Pletscher Reference Arjo and Pletscher1999, Prior and Weatherhead Reference Prior and Weatherhead2004, Blázquez et al. Reference Blázquez, Sánchez-Zapata, Botella, Carrete and Eguía2009, Moreno-Opo et al. Reference Moreno-Opo, Trujillano and Margalida2016). Even so, if the resource is scarce, competition can allow more aggressive species to monopolise food and possibly to increase, displacing the other species (Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Blanco and Bustamante1991a, Stolen Reference Stolen1996).

In north-western Patagonia, carrion is used by several avian scavengers of different sizes (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994). The three most important scavengers in the area are representatives of the Cathartidae family (Order Cathartiformes): the Andean Condor Vultur gryphus, Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura and American Black Vulture Coragyps atratus. Other birds which also use this type of food belong to the family Falconidae (Order Falconiformes, e.g. Milvago chimango and Caracara plancus), but the latter only do so facultatively (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994). Therefore, at least among obligate scavengers, there could be competition for such a fleeting and random resource as carrion, especially if an imbalance in abundance occurs which favours one species over others (Cortés-Avizanda Reference Cortés-Avizanda2010, Cortés-Avizanda et al. Reference Cortés-Avizanda, Jovani, Carrete and Donázar2012). The variables that could have an impact on this balance are: the location of the roosts (Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Blanco and Bustamante1991a, Ballejo and De Santis Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013, Novaes and Cintra Reference Novaes and Cintra2013), topography (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Lambertucci, Speziale, Ceballos, Travaini, Delibes, Hiraldo and Donázar2010), proximity to human structures (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Speziale, Rogers and Morales2009a, Novaes and Cintra Reference Novaes and Cintra2013), weather conditions that facilitate access to carrion (Shepard and Lambertucci Reference Shepard and Lambertucci2013) and hierarchy (Houston Reference Houston1988). As there is a hierarchy in access to the carrion by size, the largest avian scavenger Andean Condor (c.12 kg) displaces smaller scavenging birds (Wallace and Temple Reference Wallace and Temple1987). However, it has been documented that the number of condors feeding on a carcass decreases relative to the abundance of Black Vultures (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Lambertucci, Speziale, Ceballos, Travaini, Delibes, Hiraldo and Donázar2010).

Food availability resulting from human activities such as garbage dumps, slaughterhouses and fishing discards are a source of predictable resources in space and time that Black Vultures take advantage of, leading to increases in population size (Houston Reference Houston1988, Campbell Reference Campbell2014, Barbar et al. Reference Barbar, Werenkraut, Morales and Lambertucci2015). Previous work with Old World vultures has shown that, in areas where human activities generate a temporal and spatial predictability of carcass disposal, there is a decrease in the diversity of scavengers, as opposed to areas where carrion remains unpredictable. In these scenarios species richness remains constant, but not taxonomic diversity, so individuals of dominant species are present in greater numbers. (Wilmers et al. Reference Wilmers, Stahler, Crabtree, Smith and Getz2003, Cortés-Avizanda et al. Reference Cortés-Avizanda, Jovani, Carrete and Donázar2012, Oro et al. Reference Oro, Genovart, Taveccia, Fowler and Martínez Abraín2013).

The Black Vulture and the Andean Condor feed mainly on domestic livestock (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b, Ballejo and De Santis, Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013), whereas the Turkey Vulture has a wider diet (Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Delibes, Bustamante and Estrella1991b). However, there have been no comparative studies on their diet overlap in the same area. Therefore, our aim is to analyse and compare the diet of three obligate scavenger species from north-western Patagonia, by analysing the overlap of trophic niche from their pellets. We expect a greater degree of trophic niche overlap between Black Vulture and Andean Condor, compared with the Turkey Vulture, mainly in places far from the urban development, which will be further support for the scenario of competition between those species.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area lies in north-western Argentine Patagonia, southern tip of South America (36°–41°S and 71°–68°W) (Figure 1). The climate is cold-temperate, with frequent snowfall in winter and with summer being the driest season (Paruelo et al. Reference Paruelo, Beltran, Jobbagy, Sala and Golluscio1998). The study area encompasses almost 100,000 km2 and includes a mosaic of woodlands and steppes that forms a heterogeneous landscape. The geological and climatic history, along with more recent erosive processes, have created a large number of cliffs that are used as communal roosts by condors. Cliffs and forests are used by vultures as communal roosts (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994). The area has been used for extensive livestock ranching since the last century, and is also one of the regions in Argentina that received the greatest amount of exotic mammal introductions, including Red Deer Cervus elaphus, Wild Boar Sus scrofa, European Hare Lepus europaeus, and Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus (Novillo and Ojeda Reference Novillo and Ojeda2008, Speziale et al. Reference Speziale, Lambertucci, Carrete and Tella2012). Those species have been reported as part of the scavengers’ diet (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b, Ballejo and De Santis Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013).

Figure 1. Diagram of the study area and location of each species roost found. 1. Estacas, 2. Victoria, 3. Coihues, 4. Jones, 5. Dina Huapi, 6. Cóndor II, 7. Cóndor I, 8. Chacabuco I, 9. Buitrera, 10. Fg. Chica, 11. Fg. Grande, 12. Condorerita, 13. Pipilcurá, 14. Pichileufú, 15. Chaqueñita, 16. Huechaue, 17. Remolinos, 18. Guanaco, 19. Covunco, 20 Chacabuco II, 21. Chocón.

Study species

We studied three species of obligate scavengers. The Andean Condor (female: 8–11 kg; male: 11–15 kg) feeds in Patagonia, southern South America, mainly on domestic ungulates (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b) Roosting and nesting occur in mountains (on cliffs, and rock shelters) and foraging occurs in open areas - steppes, grasslands, and beaches along the coast (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994, Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Alarcón, Hiraldo, Sanchez-Zapata, Blanco and Donázar2014). It is a species of large dimensions, which displaces smaller species from access to carrion. Due to its large and efficient bill it can open the abdominal cavity of large ungulates, providing access to the viscera for other birds of lower rank (Wallace and Temple Reference Wallace and Temple1987, Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994). The study area has one of the best condor populations known (more than 250 individuals; Lambertucci Reference Lambertucci2010). The Turkey Vulture (0.85–2.0 kg) roosts socially on cliffs, rock shelters, and trees. They feed on carcasses of different sizes, soaring at low altitudes in small groups and mainly using their sense of smell, allowing them to locate small carcasses, which are consumed quickly, before other members of the guild arrive (Houston Reference Houston1988, Thomaides et al. Reference Thomaides, Valdez, Reid and Raitt1989, Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Delibes, Bustamante and Estrella1991b, Buckley Reference Buckley1997). There are no current estimations of the population size or trends of this species in the area. The Black Vulture (1.1–1.9 kg) inhabits open areas and roosts on cliffs, rock shelters, or trees. It forages and feeds socially in large groups, and searches for food using the sense of sight (Houston Reference Houston1988, Stolen Reference Stolen1996). It feeds on carcasses of different sizes (Coleman and Fraser Reference Coleman and Fraser1989) and is favoured by human activities that gather organic matter in places like garbage dumps and slaughterhouses (Iñigo Elías 1987, Ballejo and De Santis Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013). Black Vulture arrived in the area relatively recently and has expanded its distribution following human activities. Houston (Reference Houston, Buckley, Foster, Morton, Ridgley and Buckley1985, Reference Houston1988) notes that Black Vulture is more abundant in open habitats near human settlements of at least 3,000 people. He also suggests that before the human settlement of South America, Black Vultures were probably restricted to open savannas, swamplands and large river banks, feeding on large mammals, stranded fish, and smaller food items. This range expansion is evidenced in the literature (Darwin Reference Darwin1839, Houston Reference Houston, Buckley, Foster, Morton, Ridgley and Buckley1985, Reference Houston1988, Tonni and Noriega Reference Tonni and Noriega1988, Buckley Reference Buckley1997). Current studies show the greatest abundance of Black Vultures in urban and semi-urban areas (Bellati Reference Bellati2000, Campbell Reference Campbell2014, Barbar et al. Reference Barbar, Werenkraut, Morales and Lambertucci2015). There is no study analysing the expansion of the population in the study area, however, these populations have probably increased in parallel with urbanisation processes as in other regions (Del Hoyo et al. Reference Del Hoyo, Elliott and Sargatal1994, Campbell Reference Campbell2014).

Diet survey

During the summer of 2012, we collected vulture pellets from communal roosts to analyse the composition of the diet. The analysis of pellets is one of the most used methods to study bird of prey diet; however, this method overestimates the bone remains of smaller prey. In contrast, skeletal remains found in the nest overestimate the larger prey. Vulture pellets mainly have hair. Therefore this method is reliable with an adequate knowledge of the fauna in the area, good comparison collections, and the application of microscopy techniques (Real Reference Real1996).

Pellets were collected from: a) Eight Black Vulture roosts; four of them characterised by being on trees in Patagonian steppe, near livestock farms in an area that has been used for extensive livestock of sheep, and away from urban centres (Chacabuco I, Condor I, Condor II and Jones); and the last four characterised by being near or within urban areas: the Estacas roost is less than 2 km from a garbage dump; the Victoria roost is on abandoned buildings; and the Coihues and Dina Huapi roosts are on trees within villages with these names; b) two Turkey Vulture roosts, one of them is on trees in rural context near a trout farm (Chacabuco II), and the other is on trees inside a town (Chocón); and c) 11 Andean Condor roosts; which are on cliffs in a natural environment in the Patagonian steppe. Location of roosts is shown in Figure 1. Roosts were classified as rural context (rural and natural environments located more than 15 km from an urban area) and urban context (located within or less than 2 km from an urban area).

Bone and teeth were separated and studied under a stereoscopic microscope (10–40 x). Bone remains were identified using reference materials from the collection at the Museum of Natural Science of La Plata (Buenos Aires Province). Moreover, hair remains were identified using cuticular and medullary patterns with optical microscopy, and using reference materials from the collection at the Museum of La Plata, and the collection of “Patagonia Vertebrate inventory” from the National Parks Administration (Administración de Parques Nacionales, Argentina), as well as with bibliographic sources (Chehébar and Martín Reference Chehébar and Martín1989, De Marinis and Asprea Reference De Marinis and Asprea2006). Feathers and arthropod heads were identified by comparison with a reference collection from the Museum of La Plata, Buenos Aires (Argentina).

In the case of the Andean Condor roosts, samples collected in 2007 and in this study in 2009 were pooled. The 2007 data was published in a previous work, corresponding to the same study area (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b). To confirm that there has been no change in diet over the years regarding the pellets collected for this work, we applied the Pianka index of trophic niche overlap (O j, k = Σpij applied. Pik / √ (Σpij2. Σpik2) (Pianka Reference Pianka1973), where pij and pik are the proportion of the prey type “i” in the diet of the “j” and “k” species respectively. This index yields values from 0 (no overlap) to 1 (complete overlap) and we did not find any differences (O j, k = 0.985).

We used the minimum number of individuals (MNI) based on the bone elements found in pellets (Grayson Reference Grayson1978). In the cases in which they were not found, hair, feathers and / or scales were counted, considering one individual per pellet; arthropods were quantified based on their heads. In all cases species found were identified at the lowest possible taxonomic level.

Data analysis

We expressed our results on diet composition as a percentage of the total prey (representing the number of times each item was encountered in relation to the overall number of items in all pellets), and percentage occurrence of each item in relation to the overall number of pellets. Diet diversity was calculated using the Shannon index, H ’= -Σpilog2pi, and we used Pianka’s index (Pianka Reference Pianka1973) to compare dietary overlap. From the results of this last index, we created a dendrogram using the statistical software PAST (Paleontological Statistics) version 3.02. The graphic display of this analysis shows clusters in relation to the similarities in the taxa ingested by individuals of each roost. Finally, we carried out a correspondence analysis to examine the relationship between the environment where the roosts were located and the taxa consumed. This type of analysis aims to represent each of the possible values for each variable, where the relative position of the points reflects the degree of association between each of the concepts represented. To perform this analysis a contingency table was drawn up where taxa ingested were placed in rows, and scavenger species in columns, and separated in relation to the environment where their roosts are located (rural or urban context). We used RStudio program (pgirmess package) for this statistical analysis (Giraudoux and Giraudoux Reference Giraudoux and Giraudoux2015).

Results

The three species studied consume carrion of large ungulates (mainly sheep) and hares. In turn, vultures also eat other mammals such as canines, where the genus Lycalopex was the most represented in the pellets in addition to weasels (Mustelidae), felines and cricetid rodents (Table 1). However, vultures also prey on arthropods. The most representative arthropods in the samples were Coleoptera (Tenebrionidae), Hymenoptera and the Orthoptera (Formicidae). But among Coleoptera, the fmailies Scarabaeidae, Carabidae, Elateridae and Curculionidae were also found, in addition to representatives of the order Blattodea and the Chelicerata (family Bothriuridae). In turn, synthetic materials such as polyethylene bags, rubber bands and rubber were also found in vulture pellets. Turkey Vulture has the highest diet diversity, as their sample includes both large ungulates and reptiles as well as teleost fishes and a large number of birds and carnivores. The lowest diversity value is found in the samples of Andean condor, which feeds mainly on domestic ungulates and hares (Table 2).

Table 1. Diet composition of three scavenger species in northwestern Patagonian. We present the number of prey items (n) Frequency percentage (F%) corresponds to the percentage of the total number of taxa. Percentage of occurrence (O%) is the percentage of the total number of pellets.

Table 2. Shannon diversity index calculated on the basis of the diet in different communal roosts for three species of scavengers (Cathartidae family)

The dendrogram shows the similarity between prey type consumed among each roost (Figure 2). Three main groups were found, one of which contains only the Andean Condor roosts; the second contains Black Vulture roosts, characterised by being located away from urban centres and near livestock farms; the last group contains the remaining roosts belonging to both species of vultures, most of which are near or within urban centres. However, in this last group there is a clear segregation between both species of vultures. Moreover, the first two groups share a higher degree of similarity to each other (0.4–0.5) than with the third (0.2–0.3).

Figure 2. Dendrogram based on the Pianka index of trophic niche overlap of the diet of three species of scavengers surveyed in their communal roosts. Roosts were located in Rural context (RC) or Urban context (UC).

Associations between variables considering the closeness that each of the points in the correspondence analysis (Figure 3) were in agreement with the dendrogram (Figure 2). Black Vultures in a rural context have a similar diet to the Andean Condor, with Lepus europaeus, Ovis aries and Cervus elaphus the taxa with the highest incidences. Black Vultures in urban areas differ from the previous group, with Bos taurus and Sus scrofa being the most frequent prey items. On the other hand, Turkey Vulture roosts are found in both kinds of habitat (rural and urban) and they showed the highest diversity. This is mainly because they are the only species in which reptiles and fish occur in their pellets, and they feed on a higher proportion of felines, canines and cricetid rodents than the other two species (see Table 1).

Figure 3. Correspondence analysis showing the ingested taxa (points) and scavenger species (geometric figures) separated by the environment where their roosts are located. The “other” category includes felids, canids and cricetid rodents.

Discussion

To maintain a demographic balance between populations in a community, species occupy certain trophic niches and have specific foraging strategies. When they move away from this balance, an increase in the trophic niche overlap might take place, increasing competition for resources (Pianka Reference Pianka1985). Our results indicate that such overlaps exists to a significant degree between the Black Vulture and the Andean Condor in rural areas, but not with the Turkey Vulture. The Andean Condor and the Black Vulture feed primarily on domestic livestock carrion (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b, Ballejo and De Santis Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013, this study). Moreover, they showed higher trophic niche overlap when roosting in a similar context (i.e. they feed on similar food sources when they are far from cities, in a rural context). The Turkey Vulture feeds on the widest range of carrion, regardless of where the roosts are sited, incorporating fish, reptiles and a larger number of birds, carnivores and mice in their diet. As a result, the trophic niche overlap with the other two species is reduced. The difference in selection of carrion might be due to the developed sense of smell which is characteristic of this bird, and which allows them to find carcases of a size that would go unnoticed by the other two species, that mainly use the sense of sight for this purpose (Houston Reference Houston1988). Moreover, their ability to fly at low altitudes allows them to seek alternative sources of food (Coleman and Fraser Reference Coleman and Fraser1989, Stolen Reference Stolen2000).

Black Vulture roosts located in rural areas showed a greater diversity than those in urban areas. An exception is the Estacas roost, which is located near a rubbish dump. The use of garbage as food is well documented in scavengers (Plaza and Lambertucci Reference Plaza and Lambertucci2017). In those places the diversity of food sources and its availability have a positive effect on the development of their populations (Plaza and Lambertucci Reference Plaza and Lambertucci2017, Steigerwald et al. Reference Steigerwald, Igual, Payo-Payo and Tavecchia2015). Differences in diversity of taxa consumed in rural and urban roosts of Black Vulture have been previously documented, with cows and sheep as the main prey consumed, whereas in rural roosts, hares and a large number of arthropods replace that domestic food source (Ballejo and De Santis, Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013). Furthermore, we can assert that the Turkey Vulture has a higher prey diversity in both roosts studied, as found by other authors (Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Delibes, Bustamante and Estrella1991b). The Andean Condor tends to occur far from human-occupied areas (Speziale et al. Reference Speziale, Lambertucci and Olsson2008). It has the lowest value in food diversity since they feed almost exclusively on domestic and wild exotic species in rural environments (Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Trejo, Di Martino, Sánchez-Zapata, Donázar and Hiraldo2009b).

The Old World scavengers are temporally and spatially segregated in the use of carrion (Kruuk Reference Kruuk1967, Blázquez et al. Reference Blázquez, Sánchez-Zapata, Botella, Carrete and Eguía2009, Cortés-Avizanda Reference Cortés-Avizanda2010, Kendall et al. Reference Kendall, Virani, Kirui, Thomsett and Githiru2012, Moreno-Opo et al. Reference Moreno-Opo, Trujillano and Margalida2016). Once they find a carcase, they can dominate birds of lower rank. However, smaller birds can sometimes benefit from their presence as they dismember large corpses (Kruuk Reference Kruuk1967, Moreno-Opo et al. Reference Moreno-Opo, Trujillano, Arredondo, González and Margalida2015). The random distribution of carcases plays a key role, because where carcases are concentrated in small areas, the diversity of scavengers is affected, leaving the resource to be monopolised by the largest and most abundant species (Cortés-Avizanda et al. Reference Cortés-Avizanda, Jovani, Carrete and Donázar2012). On the other hand, they show differences in bill morphology and pecking activity (number of pecks through time), allowing them to specialise in the exploitation of different body parts (Kruuk Reference Kruuk1967, Moreno-Opo et al. Reference Moreno-Opo, Trujillano and Margalida2016). This facilitates coexistence between species. Similarly, New World vultures (Cathartidae) have a clear size hierarchy, in which the larger birds typically displace the smaller (Wallace and Temple Reference Wallace and Temple1987, Houston Reference Houston1988, Hertel Reference Hertel1994). However, when the number of individuals is unbalanced, these hierarchies can be lost (Buckley Reference Buckley1996, Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Lambertucci, Speziale, Ceballos, Travaini, Delibes, Hiraldo and Donázar2010). In this sense, Turkey Vultures and Andean Condors could be displaced from carcasses when Black Vultures appear in large numbers. Despite this, Turkey Vultures can diversify their diet to incorporate bodies of smaller animals (Hiraldo et al. Reference Hiraldo, Delibes and Donazar1991c). This does not happen with the Andean Condor, probably because small animals hardly cover their nutritional needs (Donázar et al. Reference Donázar, Cortés-Avizanda and Carrete2010). This would be less likely to affect Andean Condor populations if both species consumed different taxa or had extensive dietary diversity. However, our results indicate that both species consume similar taxa in areas of sympatry, which supports the idea that Andean Condor populations could be adversely affected if the number of Black Vultures increased (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Lambertucci, Speziale, Ceballos, Travaini, Delibes, Hiraldo and Donázar2010).

The ability to feed on anthropogenic waste is evidenced by the presence of synthetic materials found in the pellets of Black Vultures in this study, as well as in previous works (Iñigo Elías 1987, Sazima Reference Sazima2007, Ballejo and De Santis Reference Ballejo and De Santis2013). Therefore, a scenario of asymmetric competition may arise, with Black Vultures benefiting from the presence of alternative and predictable food resources generated by human activities (Novaes and Cintra Reference Novaes and Cintra2013). This could be the reason why this species has become increasingly common in urban environments (Novaes and Cintra Reference Novaes and Cintra2013, Campbell Reference Campbell2014), extending its distribution and abundance to areas occupied by the Andean Condor (Bellati Reference Bellati2000, Barbar et al. Reference Barbar, Werenkraut, Morales and Lambertucci2015). This type of anthropogenic resource is not used by the Andean Condor in the area, as it is very sensitive to urbanisation (Speziale et al. Reference Speziale, Lambertucci and Olsson2008, Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Speziale, Rogers and Morales2009a), nor in most of its distribution range (except in one place in Central Chile). Condor populations have been affected to a different extent in different countries, becoming in danger of extinction in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela (Lambertucci Reference Lambertucci2007). In Argentina their populations are more numerous (Lambertucci Reference Lambertucci2010), but face a series of threats, including persecution, ingestion of toxic baits and pesticides, poisoning by ingestion of lead ammunition, and collision with power lines (Lambertucci Reference Lambertucci2007, Lambertucci et al. Reference Lambertucci, Donazar, Huertas, Jiménez, Sáez, Sanchez-Zapata and Hiraldo2011). This situation places the Andean Condor in a vulnerable position which could worsen in the presence of numerous populations of Black Vultures (Carrete et al. Reference Carrete, Lambertucci, Speziale, Ceballos, Travaini, Delibes, Hiraldo and Donázar2010).

The presence of resources resulting from human activities, which are predictable in space and time (e.g. landfill), has direct effects on individuals, but also generates cascade effects on populations and communities worldwide (Oro et al. Reference Oro, Genovart, Taveccia, Fowler and Martínez Abraín2013, Plaza and Lambertucci Reference Plaza and Lambertucci2017). The effects on birds are diverse, for example by generating changes in their home-ranges, since they are limited to areas where food is located (Monsarrat et al. Reference Monsarrat, Benhamou, Sarrazin, Bessa-Gomes, Bouten and Duriez2013); and altering nesting and roosting areas, since these are selected for proximity to sources of food (Kristan and Boarman Reference Kristan and Boarman2007, Selva and Fortuna Reference Selva and Fortuna2007). They can generate a dependency on the resource, so a lack of can trigger sharp declines in the populations that profit from it (Oro et al. Reference Oro, Margalida, Carrete, Heredia and Donázar2008) and they can diminish the diversity of communities, since the resource can be monopolised by more aggressive species (Cortés-Avizanda et al. Reference Cortés-Avizanda, Jovani, Carrete and Donázar2012, Plaza and Lambertucci Reference Plaza and Lambertucci2017). But one of the main consequences is that these resources can facilitate the emergence of native invader species, since the availability of readily available food can increase the population of species that can best take advantage of this resource in comparison to others (Carey et al. Reference Carey, Sanderson, Barnas and Olden2012; Oro et al. Reference Oro, Genovart, Taveccia, Fowler and Martínez Abraín2013, Plaza and Lambertucci Reference Plaza and Lambertucci2017). These species might have a similar impact to that caused by alien invader species, which through various mechanisms such as competition, can alter the structure of a community and in severe cases reduce or eliminate populations of native species (Carey et al. Reference Carey, Sanderson, Barnas and Olden2012). Black Vultures show the typical characteristics of a native invader species, with environmental changes generated by human activities facilitating population growth, increasing their survival and reproduction. Therefore, they can take advantage of the vacancies left by other native species that suffer a loss or decline of their populations because of these activities (Carey et al. Reference Carey, Sanderson, Barnas and Olden2012). This kind of competition favoured by human activities should to be incorporated in conservation strategies, particularly those aiming to conserve the most vulnerable and less flexible species to anthropogenic advance.

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Contaldi who helped in the field and F Doyharzabal for revising the English. Managers and owners of La Buitrera, San Ramón, El Cóndor, Chacabuco farms, as well as E Bendstrup and the Administración de Parques Nacionales gave permission to study the roosts. This work has been funded by Project 11/N769 of the Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, UNLP. We also thank the support of CONICET, and PICT-BID (2014-0725). We thank K. Bildstein, A. Margalida, and an anonymous reviewer for the comments that helped to improve a previous version of this manuscript.

References

Arjo, W. M. and Pletscher, D. H. (1999) Behavioral responses of coyotes to wolf recolonization in northwestern Montana. Can. J. Zool. 1927: 19191927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballejo, F. and De Santis, L. J. M. (2013) Dieta estacional del jote cabeza negra (Coragyps atratus) en un área rural y una urbana. Hornero 28: 714.Google Scholar
Barbar, F., Werenkraut, V., Morales, J. M. and Lambertucci, S. A. (2015) Emerging ecosystems change the spatial distribution of top carnivores even in poorly populated areas. PLoS One 10: 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, P. S., Cunningham, S. A, Lindenmayer, D. B. and Manning, A. D. (2013) The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia 171: 761–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellati, J. (2000) Comportamiento y abundancia relativa de rapaces de la Patagonia Extrandina Argentina. Ornitol. Neotrop. 11: 207222.Google Scholar
Blázquez, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Botella, F., Carrete, M. and Eguía, S. (2009) Spatio-temporal segregation of facultative avian scavengers at ungulate carcasses. Acta Oecologica 35: 645650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, N. J. (1996) Food finding and the influence of information, local enhancement, and communal roosting on foraging success of North American vultures. Auk 113: 473488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, N. J. (1997) Experimental tests of the information-center hypothesis with black vultures (Coragyps atratus) and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 267279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M. O. N. (2014) The impact of urbanization and agricultural development on vultures in El Salvador. Vulture News 66: 1628.Google Scholar
Carey, M. P., Sanderson, B. L., Barnas, K. A and Olden, J. D. (2012) Native invaders – challenges for science, management, policy, and society. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10: 373381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrete, M., Lambertucci, S. A., Speziale, K., Ceballos, O., Travaini, A., Delibes, M., Hiraldo, F. and Donázar, J. A. (2010) Winners and losers in human-made habitats: interspecific competition outcomes in two Neotropical vultures. Anim. Conserv. 13: 390398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehébar, C. and Martín, S. (1989) Guía para el reconocimiento microscópico de los pelos de los mamíferos de la Patagonia. Acta Vertebr. 16: 247291.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. and Fraser, J. D. (1989) Habitat use and home ranges of black and turkey vultures. J. Wildl. Manage. 53: 782792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortés-Avizanda, A. (2010) Efectos ecológicos de la heterogeneidad espacial y predecibilidad en la distribución de los recursos: carroñas y gremios de carroñeros. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Cortés-Avizanda, A., Jovani, R., Carrete, M. and Donázar, J. A. (2012) Resource unpredictability promotes species diversity and coexistence in an avian scavenger guild: A field experiment. Ecology 93: 25702579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1839) Narrative of the surveying voyages of His Majesty’s ships Adventurer and Beagle, between the years 1826 and 1836. London, UK: Coribun.Google Scholar
De Marinis, A. M. and Asprea, A. (2006) Hair identification key of wild and domestic ungulates from southern Europe. Wildlife Biol. 12: 305320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (1994) Handbook of the birds of the world. New World Vultures to Guineafowl, Lymx Editions, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Donázar, J. A., Cortés-Avizanda, A. and Carrete, M. (2010) Dietary shifts in two vultures after the demise of supplementary feeding stations: consequences of the EU sanitary legislation. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56: 613621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudoux, P. and Giraudoux, M. P. (2015) Package ‘pgirmess’. See https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess/.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. K. (1978) Minimum numbers and sample size in vertebrate faunal analysis. Am. Antiq. 43: 5365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, G. (1998) Estrategias de forrajeo. Pp. 359–381 in Ardila, R., López, W., Pérez, A. M., Quiñones, R. and Reyes, F, eds. Manual de análisis experimental del comportamiento. Madrid, Spain: Librería Nueva.Google Scholar
Hertel, F. (1994) Diversity in body size and feeding morphology within past and present vulture assemblages. Ecology 75: 10741084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraldo, F., Blanco, J. C. and Bustamante, J. (1991a) Unspecialized exploitation of small carcasses by birds. Bird Study. 38: 200207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraldo, F., Delibes, M., Bustamante, J. and Estrella, R. R. (1991b) Overlap in the diets of diurnal raptors breeding at the Michilia Biosphere Reserve, Durango, Mexico. J. Raptor Res. 25: 2529.Google Scholar
Hiraldo, F., Delibes, M. and Donazar, J. A. (1991c) Comparison of diets of Turkey Vultures in three regions of Northern Mexico. J. Field Ornithol. 62: 319324.Google Scholar
Houston, D. C. (1985) Evolutionary ecology of Afrotropical and neotropical vultures in forests. In Buckley, P., Foster, M., Morton, E., Ridgley, R. and Buckley, F., eds. Neotropical ornithology, American Ornithologists Union. Washington D.C. pp. 6864.Google Scholar
Houston, D. C. (1988) Competition for food between Neotropical vultures in forest. Ibis 130: 402417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iñigo Elías, E. E. (1987) Feeding habits and ingestion of synthetic products in a black vulture population from Chiapas, Mexico. Acta Zool. Mex. 22: 115.Google Scholar
Kendall, C. O. K., Virani, M. Z., Kirui, P., Thomsett, S. and Githiru, M. (2012) Mechanisms of Coexistence in Vultures: Understanding the Patterns of Vulture Abundance at Carcasses in Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya. Condor 114: 523531.Google Scholar
Kristan, W. B. and Boarman, W. I. (2007) Effects of anthropogenic developments on common Raven nesting biology in the west Mojave Desert. Ecol. Appl. 17: 17031713.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruuk, H. (1967) Competition for food between vultures in East Africa. Ardea 55: 171193.Google Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A. (2007) Biología y conservación del Cóndor Andino. Hornero 22: 149158.Google Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A. (2010) Size and spatio-temporal variations of the Andean condor Vultur gryphus population in north-west Patagonia, Argentina: communal roosts and conservation. Oryx 44: 441447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A., Alarcón, P., Hiraldo, F., Sanchez-Zapata, J. A., Blanco, G., Donázar, J. A. (2014) Apex scavenger movements call for transboundary conservation policies. Biol. Conserv. 170: 145150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A., Donazar, J. A., Huertas, A. D., Jiménez, B., Sáez, M., Sanchez-Zapata, J. A. and Hiraldo, F. (2011) Widening the problem of lead poisoning to a South-American top scavenger: Lead concentrations in feathers of wild Andean condors. Biol. Conserv. 144: 14641471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A., Speziale, K. L., Rogers, T. E. and Morales, J. M. (2009a) How do roads affect the habitat use of an assemblage of scavenging raptors? Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 20632074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertucci, S. A., Trejo, A., Di Martino, S., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Donázar, J. A. and Hiraldo, F. (2009b) Spatial and temporal patterns in the diet of the Andean condor: ecological replacement of native fauna by exotic species. Anim. Conserv. 12: 338345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsarrat, S., Benhamou, S., Sarrazin, F., Bessa-Gomes, C., Bouten, W. and Duriez, O. (2013) How predictability of feeding patches affects home range and foraging habitat selection in avian social scavengers? PLoS One 8: 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno-Opo, R., Trujillano, A. and Margalida, A. (2016) Behavioural coexistence and feeding efficiency drive niche partitioning at carcasses within the guild of European avian scavengers. Behavioral Ecology 27: 10411052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno-Opo, R., Trujillano, A., Arredondo, A., González, L. M. and Margalida, A. (2015) Manipulating size, amount and appearance of food inputs to optimize supplementary feeding programs for European vultures. Biol. Conserv. 181: 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, W. G. and Cintra, R. (2013) Factors influencing the selection of communal roost sites by the black vulture Coragyps atratus (Aves: Cathartidae) in an urban area in central amazon. Zoologia 30: 607614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novillo, A. and Ojeda, R. A. (2008) The exotic mammals of Argentina. Biol. Invasions 10: 13331344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oro, D., Genovart, M., Taveccia, G., Fowler, M. S. and Martínez Abraín, A. (2013) Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecol. Lett. 16: 15011514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oro, D., Margalida, A., Carrete, M., Heredia, R. and Donázar, J. A. (2008) Testing the goodness of supplementary feeding to enhance population viability in an endangered vulture. PLoS One 3: e4084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paruelo, J. M., Beltran, A., Jobbagy, E., Sala, O. E. and Golluscio, R. A. (1998) The climate of Patagonia: General patterns and controls on biotic processes. Ecol. Austral 8: 85101.Google Scholar
Pianka, E. R. (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 4: 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianka, E. R. (1985) Ecología evolutiva. Barcelona, Spain: Omega.Google Scholar
Plaza, P. I. and Lambertucci, S. A. (2017) How are garbage dumps impacting vertebrate demography, heath, and conservation? Global Ecology and Conservation 12: 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, K. A. and Weatherhead, P. J. (2004) Turkey vultures foraging at experimental food patches: a test of information transfer at communal roosts. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 385390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Real, J. (1996) Biases in diet study methods in the Bonelli´s Eagle. J. Wildl. Manage. 60: 632638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, R., Margalida, A., González, L. M. and Oria, J. (2008) Biases in diet sampling methods in the Spanish Imperial Eagle Aquila adalberti. Ornis Fennica 85: 8289.Google Scholar
Sazima, I. (2007) Unexpected cleaners: Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus) remove debris, ticks, and peck at sores of capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris), with an overview of tick-removing birds in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 15: 417426.Google Scholar
Selva, N. and Fortuna, M. a (2007) The nested structure of a scavenger community. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274: 11011108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepard, E. L. C. and Lambertucci, S. A. (2013) From daily movements to population distributions: weather affects competitive ability in a guild of soaring birds. J. R. Soc. Interface 10: 20130612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speziale, K. L., Lambertucci, S. A., Carrete, M. and Tella, J. L. (2012) Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? Biol. Invasions 14: 16091621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speziale, K. L., Lambertucci, S. A. and Olsson, O. (2008) Disturbance from roads negatively affects Andean condor habitat use. Biol. Conserv. 141: 17651772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steigerwald, E. C., Igual, J.-M., Payo-Payo, A. and Tavecchia, G. (2015) Effects of decreased anthropogenic food availability on an opportunistic gull: evidence for a size-mediated response in breeding females. Ibis 157: 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolen, E. D. (1996) Black and turkey vulture interactions with bald eagles in florida. Florida Field Nat. 24: 4345.Google Scholar
Stolen, E. D. (2000) Foraging behavior of vultures in central Florida. Florida Field Nat. 28: 173181.Google Scholar
Thomaides, C., Valdez, R., Reid, W. H. and Raitt, R. J. (1989) Food habits of turkey vultures in West Texas. J. Raptor Res. 23: 4244.Google Scholar
Tonni, E. P. and Noriega, J. I. (1988) Los cóndores (Ciconiiformes, Vulturidae) de la Región Pampeana de la Argentina durante el cenozoico tardío: distribución, interacciones y extinciones. Ameghiniana 35: 141150.Google Scholar
Wallace, M. P. and Temple, S. A. (1987) Competitive interactions within and between species in a guild of avian scavengers. Auk 104: 290295.Google Scholar
Wilmers, C. C., Stahler, D. R., Crabtree, R. L., Smith, D. W. and Getz, W. M. (2003) Resource dispersion and consumer dominance: scavenging at wolf- and hunter-killed carcasses in Greater Yellowstone, USA. Ecol. Lett. 6: 9961003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. E. and Wolkovich, E. M. (2011) Scavenging: how carnivores and carrion structure communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26: 129135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Diagram of the study area and location of each species roost found. 1. Estacas, 2. Victoria, 3. Coihues, 4. Jones, 5. Dina Huapi, 6. Cóndor II, 7. Cóndor I, 8. Chacabuco I, 9. Buitrera, 10. Fg. Chica, 11. Fg. Grande, 12. Condorerita, 13. Pipilcurá, 14. Pichileufú, 15. Chaqueñita, 16. Huechaue, 17. Remolinos, 18. Guanaco, 19. Covunco, 20 Chacabuco II, 21. Chocón.

Figure 1

Table 1. Diet composition of three scavenger species in northwestern Patagonian. We present the number of prey items (n) Frequency percentage (F%) corresponds to the percentage of the total number of taxa. Percentage of occurrence (O%) is the percentage of the total number of pellets.

Figure 2

Table 2. Shannon diversity index calculated on the basis of the diet in different communal roosts for three species of scavengers (Cathartidae family)

Figure 3

Figure 2. Dendrogram based on the Pianka index of trophic niche overlap of the diet of three species of scavengers surveyed in their communal roosts. Roosts were located in Rural context (RC) or Urban context (UC).

Figure 4

Figure 3. Correspondence analysis showing the ingested taxa (points) and scavenger species (geometric figures) separated by the environment where their roosts are located. The “other” category includes felids, canids and cricetid rodents.