Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:21:52.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In vitro effect of leptin on human cardiac contractility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2019

Ryan Chaban*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Katja Buschmann
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Ahmed Ghazy
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Alicia Poplawski
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Nadja Wittmann
Affiliation:
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany
Andres Beiras-Fernandez
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
Christian-Friedrich Vahl
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Ryan Chaban, fax +49 6131 17 3941, email [email protected]

Abstract

Leptin, a hormone produced by adipose tissue, has been linked to many regulatory pathways. Its role in the complex relationship between obesity and CVD is not yet clear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether leptin interferes directly with cardiac function regulation, altering its contractile force character, and hence contributing to different pathological processes. Muscle samples were obtained from human atrial myocardium. Each trial included two samples from the same patient. They were simultaneously electrically stimulated under sustained perfusion to perform isometric contractions. One sample was treated with a high concentration of human recombinant leptin (1 µg/ml). The other was treated with placebo and served as a control. The exhibited contraction forces (CF) and the contraction duration (CD) after 20 min of treatment were normalised by dividing them by the values before the treatment and reported as a percentage. A total of ten successful trials were conducted. Exposure to leptin did not yield a statistically significant variation in both CF and CF. In the treatment group, CF% measured 108 (95 % CI 91, 125) % and CD% measured 95 (95 % CI 90, 101) % after 20 min. In the control group, CF% measured 105 (90 % CI 84, 126) % and CD% measured 92 (95 % CI 80, 105) % after 20 min. We concluded that leptin does not alter the contractile character of human atrial tissues, even in supraphysiological dosage. These results suggest that leptin does not play a role in short-term cardiac regulation.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Over the last four decades, the prevalence of obesity has been growing continually, afflicting more people than ever(Reference Seidell and Halberstadt1, Reference Finucane, Stevens and Cowan2). According to the WHO, obesity has nearly tripled worldwide since 1975, with almost 39 % of adults being overweight (BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2) and 13 % being obese (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) in 2016(3). At least 2·8 million people die each year as a result of being overweight or obese, according the Global Health Observatory(4), which also states that overweight and obesity correlate with adverse metabolic effects on blood pressure, cholesterol, TAG and insulin resistance, increased risks of CHD, ischaemic stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus and higher incidence of cancer of breast, colon, prostate, endometrium, kidney and gall bladder(4).

The relationship between obesity and CVD is one of the most studied and complex medical topics due to a wide range of pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic mechanisms(Reference Litwin5) and it seems there is a consent in the medical world about the cumulative negative effect of obesity on the cardiovascular system(6, Reference Cronin, Morris and Walker7). Obesity has been reported to increase the risk of atrial fibrillation(Reference Miller, Aronis and Chrispin8) and be an independent risk factor for heart failure(Reference He, Ogden and Bazzano9, Reference Hubert, Feinleib and McNamara10) and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality(Reference Masters, Reither and Powers11). It is worth mentioning here that some studies describe higher survival rates in critical ill obese patients against critical ill individuals of normal weight, giving this hard-to-explain paradox the name ‘obesity paradox’(Reference Chase, Davis and Bensimhon12, Reference Brzecka and Ejma13).

In a previous study of ours, we were able to verify the correlation between BMI and reduced cardiac function in vitro. Using cardiac atrial tissues, obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we found that active contraction forces and passive resting tension decline significantly with increasing body weight. The ratio between passive resting tension/active contraction forces correlated significantly with body weight. The negative association between body weight and active tension amplitude was more pronounced in women(Reference Denk, Albers and Kayhan14). This correlation was also reported by Broussard et al.(Reference Broussard, Nelson and Kolka15), who found in an experimental model that high-fat feeding canines significantly increased body weight and reduced left ventricular function.

The role of leptin, the ‘appetite’ hormone produced by fat tissues, in the relationship between obesity and CVD has been suggested in many studies(Reference Fujimaki, Kanda and Fujita16Reference Barouch, Berkowitz and Harrison18), as it is usually found in higher levels in obese individuals, signifying the presence of so-called leptin resistance(Reference Myers, Cowley and Münzberg19, Reference Crujeiras, Carreira and Cabia20). Leptin has been linked to pro-inflammatory activity in other studies(Reference Santos-Alvarez, Goberna and Sánchez-Margalet21Reference Nakamura, Fuster and Walsh23) and to a direct effect on cardiomyocyte contraction, possibly through an increased NO production, in an experimental model using rat myocytes(Reference Nickola, Wold and Colligan24).

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of leptin as a possible mediator for the correlation between obesity and cardiovascular dysfunction by investigation of its direct influence upon the functioning human myocardium. We used samples obtained from the right atrium, which usually remains well protected against systematic CVD such as coronary artery diseases and arterial hypertension, and treated them in an in vitro model with a supraphysiological dosage of leptin.

Methods

The study was conducted with permission of the Ethics Board of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, and after obtaining individual written consent from the patients for using their disposed tissues, without collecting individual data. No human subjects were involved.

Obtaining of tissue

We collected in this study tissue samples from the right atrial appendages, which were routinely removed and discarded in the course of cannulation of the right atrium for cardiopulmonary bypass, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at our hospital. Donors with medical situations that exert a relevant influence on the contractile behaviour of the right atrium were excluded. Potential contra-indications included cardiomyopathy, inflammatory or infective cardiac disease, tricuspid valve incompetence, pulmonary hypertension, severe obesity, age >80 years, preoperative administration of amiodarone, chronic dialysis or similar conditions. We also excluded patients with BMI above 30 kg/m2, as those patients have a higher ratio of leptin resistance, which would render the experiments insufficient.

Standard cardiovascular anaesthesia was applied using total intravenous anaesthesia protocols, including propofol and remifentanil. A sufficient circulation was maintained using physiological solutions, noradrenalin and atropine.

Sample preparation

The tips of the right appendages were removed prior to the cannulation of the right atrium using surgical scissors. Immediately after removal they were transferred to our laboratory in cold (4°C) histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) solution (prepared by the pharmacy of the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany), which contained 15 mm-NaCl, 10 mm-KCl, 4 mm-MgCl.(H2O)6, 18 mm-histidine.HCl.H2O, 180 mm-histidine, 2 mm-tryptophan, 30 mm-mannitol, 0·015 mm-CaCl2.(H2O)2 and 1 mm-ketoglutaric acid. Following this, each sample was manually prepared under the microscope in cold HTK solution to yield muscle specimens measuring 3 × 0·5 × 0·5 mm (see Fig. 1). These muscle specimens were then stored in the dark in cold oxygenated (4°C) HTK solution for 1–48 h. We used this protocol previously in another of our studies(Reference Chaban, Kornberger and Branski25).

Fig. 1. Preparing the samples from the tips of the right atrial appendages.

Mechanical measurements

Immediately before the test the tissues were washed with warm Krebs–Henseleit (KH) solution containing (in mm): NaCl, 119·0; NaHCO3, 25·0; KCl, 4·6; KH2PO4, 1·2; MgSO4, 1·2; CaCl2, 1·3; glucose, 11·0. Thereafter they were mounted horizontally between the tweezers of two identical muscle investigation apparatuses (modified ‘Standard System for Muscle Investigation’; SH Heidelberg) and exposed to a continuous flow of warm (34°C) KH solution steamed with a mix of 95 % O2 and 5 % CO2 at a rate of 0·5 ml/min each (see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. A prepared human atrial sample is fixed between the tweezers of muscle investigation apparatus. This sample measured almost 3 mm long and 0.6 mm wide. It is shown shortly before being immersed in warm Krebs–Henseleit solution and electrically stimulated.

Following accurate baseline length measuring (slack length), each specimen was stretched to 110 % of its slack length. Then, electrical impulses of 1 ms were applied at a frequency of 75 bpm, using a Stimulator I (Hugo Sachs Elektronik). The voltage was gradually increased until the maximum isometric force of the specimen was reached. Afterwards, the specimens were left to rest for 10 to 30 min to allow them to reach a steady state before we proceeded with the trial.

Trial design

Two variables were measured in this study: the active isometric contraction forces (CF) and contraction duration (CD) (see Fig. 3). The measurement was done twice, directly before applying the treatment (CF1 and CD1) and 20 min afterwards (CF2 and CD2). Each measurement lasted 10 min and the average values were recorded in mN.

Fig. 3. Recording of the forces occurring during one contraction following electrical stimulation of a myocardial sample. Maximum isometric contraction force and the contraction duration were recorded.

Each trial included two samples from the same patient. They were simultaneously electrically stimulated under sustained perfusion to perform isometric contractions. During the stimulation, one sample was tested by treating it with leptin and the other served as a control by treating it with placebo. Fig. 4 illustrates the trial design.

Fig. 4. Illustration of the experimental design. The blue line represents the treated sample and the red line represents the control one. Both are harvested from the same patient. In this trial, the treated sample exhibit did not show considerable variation in comparison with the control one. CD, contraction duration; CF, maximal isometric contraction force; KH, Krebs–Henseleit.

Leptin application

Human recombinant leptin, expressed in Escherichia coli, was obtained as lyophilised powder from Sigma-Aldrich with a purity of >97 %. This was then reconstituted according to the manufacturer's instructions using TRIS-HCl buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) to prepare vials of 1 mg/ml each, which were then stored at 4°C for no more than 3 weeks. On the trial day, leptin was added to the warm Krebs–Henseleit solution by supplanting 100 ml of the KH solution with 0·1 ml of TRIS-HCl buffer containing 100 µg leptin. This yielded a concentration of 1 µg/ml of leptin in KH solution.

The control group was treated with 0·1 ml of TRIS-HCl buffer without leptin as placebo.

Data acquisition and statistical analysis

We relied on a PicoScope 2204A (Pico Technology), using PicoLog Software for data acquisition. Results were recorded as plain .txt files. The data was then gathered and stored in Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corp.). The CF and CD were calculated using self-developed Excel-VBA-Macros (see Supplementary material).

Statistical analysis was done using IBM-SPSS Statistics (version 23.0.0.0). Categorical variables were described by frequencies and quantitative variables by means and standard deviations.

To lay the foundation for our research, we conducted primary trials using the same model described here to detect the sample size needed in this work. By setting the statistical power to 0·8, ten trials were needed. This decision was also augmented by our experience with this model in previous research(Reference Chaban, Kornberger and Branski25).

To adjust for the diversity of the muscle specimens, we divided the values for CF and CD after treatment by the values before the treatment. The results are presented as percentage and the corresponding 95 % CI. Each trial included two samples from the same patient, one in the treatment group and another in the control group. Therefore, we utilised the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to test for differences between the treatment and the control group in the normalised CF and CD data. Two-tailed significance testing was computed as either positive or negative effects of leptin which was to be expected. An α-value of 0·05 was chosen for the significance level.

Results

A total of ten trials obtained from ten different patients were conducted successfully. The mean age of the patients was 67·2 (sd 7·8) years, including four females and six males. Table 1 illustrates their patient profile.

Table 1. Summary of the medical profiles and medications of the patients

Table 2 lists the results of all the trials. We did not observe any variation in the contractile behaviour in the human atrial cardiac tissues after 20 min of treating with high-dosage (1 µg/ml) leptin. CF and the CD remained unchanged in comparison with the control group throughout the experiments. In the treatment group, CF% after 20 min of the treatment with leptin measured 108 (95 % CI 91, 125) % and CD% was 95 (95 % CI 90, 101) %. In the control group, CF% after 20 min of exposure to the placebo measured 105 (90 % CI 84, 126) % and CD was 92 (95 % CI 80, 105) %.

Table 2. Results of all trials in absolute values and the value after the treatment divided by the value before treatment (%)

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test did not show a significant difference between the treatment and control groups neither for CF (P = 0·878) nor for CD (P = 0·169). Fig. 5 illustrates this.

Fig. 5. (a) Relative isometric contraction forces of all trials. (b) Relative contraction durations of all trials. No significant variation between the group treated with leptin and the control group was noticed.

Discussion

Our in vitro work shows no effect of high dosage of leptin on the mechanical character of the contraction of human atrial cardiac tissues in our in vitro model. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the direct effect of leptin upon myocardial contractility, using human tissues. This should help putting together the big picture of how obesity afflicts the cardiovascular system by excluding a direct effect of leptin in this process.

Evidence of leptin production by the heart(Reference Purdham, Zou and Rajapurohitam26) and the presence of its receptors there(Reference Martinez-Abundis, Rajapurohitam and Gertler27) implicate some regulatory function upon cardiac function. Leptin also influences cardiac metabolism by increasing fatty acid oxidation as shown in isolated working rat hearts(Reference Martínez-Martínez, Jurado-López and Cervantes-Escalera28, Reference Atkinson, Fischer and Lopaschuk29). Leptin has been found to increase glucose metabolism as well(Reference Kamohara, Burcelin and Halaas30). In vitro administration of leptin to primary cardiac fibroblasts resulted in significant stimulation of pro-collagen Iα, suggesting a role in the remodelling of the cardiac extracellular matrix(Reference Zibadi, Cordova and Slack31). Further, it was proven that leptin induced cardiac remodelling associated with hypertrophy(Reference Martínez-Martínez, Jurado-López and Cervantes-Escalera28). This leptin-associated hypertrophy and a successive diastolic dysfunction were also found in a population-based study (EPIPorto) involving 556 individuals, where higher leptin levels were independently associated with hypertrophy and successive diastolic dysfunction, especially in women(Reference Fontes-Carvalho, Pimenta and Bettencourt32). Samuelsson et al.(Reference Samuelsson, Clark and Rudyk33) have shown that treating pups from lean Sprague–Dawley rats with a high dosage of leptin led to elevated heart weights and higher night-time (active period) systolic blood pressure. Echocardiography showed an altered left ventricular structure and systolic function in rats treated for 30 d with leptin v. the control group and the contractile function was still impaired even 5 months after the treatment with leptin(Reference Samuelsson, Clark and Rudyk33). Larson et al.(Reference Larson, Rainer and Watts34) found that β−3-adrenoreceptors, which usually down-regulate β-adrenergic stimulation, are dependent on leptin and propose this as a possible explanation for the effect of leptin on the myocardium. Further, Breslow et al.(Reference Breslow, An and Berkowitz35) found that treating OB/OB mice (mutation in the OB gene which results in the lack of leptin) with leptin restores β−3 adrenoreceptor expression. Lin et al.(Reference Lin, Huang and Hileman36) have proven the presence of leptin receptors on the cell surface of cardiomyocytes obtained from sinus nodes and atrial rat hearts. Further, they found that high-dose leptin reduces heart rate and sometimes causes sinus pauses and ventricular tachycardia. This was present even after treating the tissues with high-dose propranolol, which indicates that this effect is independent of β-adrenoreceptor stimulation. In a meta-analysis of a total of eight case-controlled studies including 1980 patients and 11 567 controls, a significant association of leptin levels with the incidence of CHD and stroke was identified(Reference Zeng, Xu and Xu37).

Our results do not contradict these studies, as we investigated the direct effect of leptin on the myocardial contractility in the short term, so that negative results do not exclude a potential long-term mechanism. Our setup enabled us also to exclude all other interferences and to isolate the effect of leptin alone, which can also help explaining the lack of effect in our experiments. Besides, leptin is just one possibility for interaction between adipose tissues and the cardiovascular system.

The way that obesity interferes with cardiovascular function is complicated and involves numerous factors, hormonal signalling being just one of them. Another possible explanation is a direct lipid accumulation in the cardiomyocyte and an associated histological damage, leading to cardiomyocyte dysfunction and even apoptosis(Reference Zhou, Grayburn and Karim38). There is also the effect of the classical obesity co-morbidity, like arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus, both of them being considered as risk factors for CVD. Obesity has been found to negatively influence cardiovascular function even in the absence of these co-morbidities(Reference Lauer, Anderson and Kannel39).

Finally, the following limitations have to be considered, when comparing our work with other similar studies. The myocardial samples we used were obtained from a typical cardiac surgery population consisting of elderly individuals with a variety of cardiac pathologies. There are known differences between atrial and ventricular myocardium: approximately 15 % smaller atrial cell volume yielding higher surface area:volume ratio; smaller amplitude of systolic Ca2+ transients; accelerated rates of decline of systolic Ca2+; more sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)-mediated Ca2+ uptake and higher SR Ca2+ content(Reference Walden, Dibb and Trafford40). In addition, a higher density of mitochondria is usually found in ventricles(Reference Tanaami, Ishida and Seguchi41). However, regarding the contractile apparatus itself, it was found that the Ca sensitivity of the myofilaments is similar in atrial and ventricular cells(Reference Vannier, Veksler and Mekhfi42, Reference Palmer and Kentish43). Despite these differences, it seems acceptable to use the atrial tissues in our investigation, especially when the target is merely to identify any possible immediate effect and not to quantify it.

We excluded patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m2, as those patients are prone to leptin resistance and therefore a possible leptin effect on the myocardium would be less obvious in this group.

Last, the used concentration of 1 µg/ml (equivalent to 62 nmol/l) is considered supraphysiological as the normal plasma leptin concentration is about 3 to 16 ng/ml and usually less than 100 ng/ml(Reference Jensen, Hensrud and O'Brien44). We chose this concentration to compensate for a range of non-physiological conditions, such as the lack of the carrying proteins in the test medium and the oxidative damage associated with the electrolysis created by the electrical field stimulation. Furthermore, we wanted to discover any possible effect rather than to quantify it, which encouraged us to use this concentration.

Conclusion

This study shows no effect of high-dosage leptin on the mechanical character of the contractions of human atrial cardiac tissues in vitro.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2019.6

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the effort of Ms N. Stumpf in conducting this study.

This study was completely and exclusively funded by the Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. The university provided all the instruments and equipment needed as well as the human resources.

Contributions of the authors are as follows: conception and design, K. B. and R. C.; implementation of experiments, R. C. and N. W.; acquisition of data: R. C. and N. W.; statistical evaluation, A. P.; drafting of manuscript, R. C., A. G. and K. B.; critical revision, A. B.-F. and C.-F. V. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to be considered in this article. The data used in this work are part of the medical thesis work of the co-author N. W.

References

1.Seidell, JC & Halberstadt, J (2015) The global burden of obesity and the challenges of prevention. Ann Nutr Metab 66, Suppl. 2, 712.10.1159/000375143Google Scholar
2.Finucane, MM, Stevens, GA, Cowan, MJ, et al. (2011) National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants. Lancet 377, 557567.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62037-5Google Scholar
3.World Health Organization (2018) Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed February 2019).Google Scholar
4.World Health Organization (2019) Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/obesity_text/en/ (accessed February 2019).Google Scholar
5.Litwin, SE (2013) Good fat, bad fat: the increasingly complex interplay of adipose tissue and the cardiovascular system. J Am Coll Cardiol 62, 136137.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.028Google Scholar
6.Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration (2011) Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies. Lancet 377, 10851095.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60105-0Google Scholar
7.Cronin, O, Morris, DR, Walker, PJ, et al. (2013) The association of obesity with cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerosis 228, 316323.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.002Google Scholar
8.Miller, JD, Aronis, KN, Chrispin, J, et al. (2015) Obesity, exercise, obstructive sleep apnea, and modifiable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 66, 28992906.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.047Google Scholar
9.He, J, Ogden, LG, Bazzano, LA, et al. (2001) Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Arch Intern Med 161, 9961002.10.1001/archinte.161.7.996Google Scholar
10.Hubert, HB, Feinleib, M, McNamara, PM, et al. (1983) Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 67, 968977.10.1161/01.CIR.67.5.968Google Scholar
11.Masters, RK, Reither, EN, Powers, DA, et al. (2013) The impact of obesity on US mortality levels: the importance of age and cohort factors in population estimates. Am J Public Health 103, 18951901.10.2105/AJPH.2013.301379Google Scholar
12.Chase, PJ, Davis, PG & Bensimhon, DR (2014) The obesity paradox in chronic heart failure: what does it mean? Curr Heart Fail Rep 11, 111117.10.1007/s11897-013-0184-2Google Scholar
13.Brzecka, A & Ejma, M (2015) Obesity paradox in the course of cerebrovascular diseases. Adv Clin Exp Med 24, 379383.10.17219/acem/22287Google Scholar
14.Denk, K, Albers, J, Kayhan, N, et al. (2009) Evidence for a negative inotropic effect of obesity in human myocardium? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 36, 300305.10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.004Google Scholar
15.Broussard, JL, Nelson, MD, Kolka, CM, et al. (2016) Rapid development of cardiac dysfunction in a canine model of insulin resistance and moderate obesity. Diabetologia 59, 197207.10.1007/s00125-015-3767-5Google Scholar
16.Fujimaki, S, Kanda, T, Fujita, K, et al. (2001) The significance of measuring plasma leptin in acute myocardial infarction. J Int Med Res 29, 108113.10.1177/147323000102900207Google Scholar
17.McGaffin, KR, Moravec, CS, McTiernan, CF, et al. (2009) Leptin signaling in the failing and mechanically unloaded human heart. Circ Heart Fail 2, 676683.10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.869909Google Scholar
18.Barouch, LA, Berkowitz, DE, Harrison, RW, et al. (2003) Disruption of leptin signaling contributes to cardiac hypertrophy independently of body weight in mice. Circulation 108, 754759.10.1161/01.CIR.0000083716.82622.FDGoogle Scholar
19.Myers, MG, Cowley, MA & Münzberg, H (2008) Mechanisms of leptin action and leptin resistance. Annu Rev Physiol 70, 537556.10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.113006.100707Google Scholar
20.Crujeiras, AB, Carreira, MC, Cabia, B, et al. (2015) Leptin resistance in obesity: an epigenetic landscape. Life Sci 140, 5763.10.1016/j.lfs.2015.05.003Google Scholar
21.Santos-Alvarez, J, Goberna, R & Sánchez-Margalet, V (1999) Human leptin stimulates proliferation and activation of human circulating monocytes. Cell Immunol 194, 611.10.1006/cimm.1999.1490Google Scholar
22.Zarkesh-Esfahani, H, Pockley, AG, Wu, Z, et al. (2004) Leptin indirectly activates human neutrophils via induction of TNF-α. J Immunol 172, 18091814.10.4049/jimmunol.172.3.1809Google Scholar
23.Nakamura, K, Fuster, JJ & Walsh, K (2014) Adipokines: a link between obesity and cardiovascular disease. J Cardiol 63, 250259.10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.11.006Google Scholar
24.Nickola, MW, Wold, LE, Colligan, PB, et al. (2000) Leptin attenuates cardiac contraction in rat ventricular myocytes. Role of NO. Hypertension 36, 501505.10.1161/01.HYP.36.4.501Google Scholar
25.Chaban, R, Kornberger, A, Branski, N, et al. (2017) In-vitro examination of the positive inotropic effect of caffeine and taurine, the two most frequent active ingredients of energy drinks. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17, 220.10.1186/s12872-017-0625-zGoogle Scholar
26.Purdham, DM, Zou, MX, Rajapurohitam, V, et al. (2004) Rat heart is a site of leptin production and action. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287, 28772884.10.1152/ajpheart.00499.2004Google Scholar
27.Martinez-Abundis, E, Rajapurohitam, V, Gertler, A, et al. (2015) Identification of functional leptin receptors expressed in ventricular mitochondria. Mol Cell Biochem 408, 155162.10.1007/s11010-015-2491-2Google Scholar
28.Martínez-Martínez, E, Jurado-López, R, Cervantes-Escalera, P, et al. (2014) Leptin, a mediator of cardiac damage associated with obesity. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 18, 314.Google Scholar
29.Atkinson, LL, Fischer, MA & Lopaschuk, GD (2002) Leptin activates cardiac fatty acid oxidation independent of changes in the AMP-activated protein kinase-acetyl-CoA carboxylase-malonyl-CoA axis. J Biol Chem 277, 2942429430.10.1074/jbc.M203813200Google Scholar
30.Kamohara, S, Burcelin, R, Halaas, JL, et al. (1997) Acute stimulation of glucose metabolism in mice by leptin treatment. Nature 389, 374377.10.1038/38717Google Scholar
31.Zibadi, S, Cordova, F, Slack, EH, et al. (2011) Leptin's regulation of obesity-induced cardiac extracellular matrix remodeling. Cardiovasc Toxicol 11, 325333.10.1007/s12012-011-9124-0Google Scholar
32.Fontes-Carvalho, R, Pimenta, J, Bettencourt, P, et al. (2015) Association between plasma leptin and adiponectin levels and diastolic function in the general population. Expert Opin Ther Targets 19, 12831291.10.1517/14728222.2015.1019468Google Scholar
33.Samuelsson, AM, Clark, J, Rudyk, O, et al. (2013) Experimental hyperleptinemia in neonatal rats leads to selective leptin responsiveness, hypertension, and altered myocardial function. Hypertension 62, 627633.10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00691Google Scholar
34.Larson, JE, Rainer, PP, Watts, VL, et al. (2012) Dependence of β3-adrenergic signaling on the adipokine leptin in cardiac myocytes. Int J Obes (Lond) 36, 876879.10.1038/ijo.2011.137Google Scholar
35.Breslow, MJ, An, Y & Berkowitz, DE (1997) β-3 Adrenoceptor (β−3AR) expression in leptin treated OB/OB mice. Life Sci 61, 5964.10.1016/S0024-3205(97)00358-5Google Scholar
36.Lin, YC, Huang, J, Hileman, S, et al. (2015) Leptin decreases heart rate associated with increased ventricular repolarization via its receptor. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 309, 17311739.10.1152/ajpheart.00623.2015Google Scholar
37.Zeng, R, Xu, CH, Xu, YN, et al. (2014) Association of leptin levels with pathogenetic risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a meta-analysis. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 58, 817823.10.1590/0004-2730000003390Google Scholar
38.Zhou, YT, Grayburn, P, Karim, A, et al. (2000) Lipotoxic heart disease in obese rats: implications for human obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 17841789.10.1073/pnas.97.4.1784Google Scholar
39.Lauer, MS, Anderson, KM, Kannel, WB, et al. (1991) The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry. JAMA 266, 231236.10.1001/jama.1991.03470020057032Google Scholar
40.Walden, AP, Dibb, KM & Trafford, AW (2009) Differences in intracellular calcium homeostasis between atrial and ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 49, 463473.10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.11.003Google Scholar
41.Tanaami, T, Ishida, H, Seguchi, H, et al. (2005) Difference in propagation of Ca2+ release in atrial and ventricular myocytes. Jpn J Physiol 55, 8191.10.2170/jjphysiol.R2077Google Scholar
42.Vannier, C, Veksler, V, Mekhfi, H, et al. (1996) Functional tissue and developmental specificities of myofibrils and mitochondria in cardiac muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 74, 2331.10.1139/y95-223Google Scholar
43.Palmer, S & Kentish, JC (1996) Developmental differences and regional similarities in the responses of rat cardiac skinned muscles to acidosis, inorganic phosphate and caffeine. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28, 797805.10.1006/jmcc.1996.0074Google Scholar
44.Jensen, MD, Hensrud, D, O'Brien, PC, et al. (1999) Collection and interpretation of plasma leptin concentration data in humans. Obes Res 7, 241245.10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00402.xGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Preparing the samples from the tips of the right atrial appendages.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. A prepared human atrial sample is fixed between the tweezers of muscle investigation apparatus. This sample measured almost 3 mm long and 0.6 mm wide. It is shown shortly before being immersed in warm Krebs–Henseleit solution and electrically stimulated.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Recording of the forces occurring during one contraction following electrical stimulation of a myocardial sample. Maximum isometric contraction force and the contraction duration were recorded.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Illustration of the experimental design. The blue line represents the treated sample and the red line represents the control one. Both are harvested from the same patient. In this trial, the treated sample exhibit did not show considerable variation in comparison with the control one. CD, contraction duration; CF, maximal isometric contraction force; KH, Krebs–Henseleit.

Figure 4

Table 1. Summary of the medical profiles and medications of the patients

Figure 5

Table 2. Results of all trials in absolute values and the value after the treatment divided by the value before treatment (%)

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) Relative isometric contraction forces of all trials. (b) Relative contraction durations of all trials. No significant variation between the group treated with leptin and the control group was noticed.

Supplementary material: File

Chaban et al. supplementary material

Chaban et al. supplementary material 1

Download Chaban et al. supplementary material(File)
File 160.3 KB