Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:40:20.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of parasites in three latrines from Medieval and Renaissance Brussels, Belgium (14th–17th centuries)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Anna Graff
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Emma Bennion-Pedley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Ariadin K. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Marissa L. Ledger
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Koen Deforce
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000Brussels, Belgium
Ann Degraeve
Affiliation:
Brussel Stedenbouw en Erfgoed, Kunstberg 10-13, 1000Brussels, Belgium
Sylvie Byl
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherches en Archéologie et Patrimoine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050Brussels, Belgium
Piers D. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Piers D. Mitchell, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the species of parasite that infected the population of Brussels during the Medieval and Renaissance periods, and determine if there was notable variation between different households within the city. We compared multiple sediment layers from cesspits beneath three different latrines dating from the 14th–17th centuries. Helminths and protozoa were detected using microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We identified Ascaris sp., Capillaria sp., Dicrocoelium dendriticum, Entamoeba histolytica, Fasciola hepatica, Giardia duodenalis, Taenia sp. and Trichuris sp. in Medieval samples, and continuing presence of Ascaris sp., D. dendriticum, F. hepatica, G. duodenalis and Trichuris sp. into the Renaissance. While some variation existed between households, there was a broadly consistent pattern with the domination of species spread by fecal contamination of food and drink (whipworm, roundworm and protozoa that cause dysentery). These data allow us to explore diet and hygiene, together with routes for the spread of fecal–oral parasites. Key factors explaining our findings are manuring practices with human excrement in market gardens, and flooding of the polluted River Senne during the 14th–17th centuries.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

In the late Medieval and Renaissance periods, the Low Countries (now Belgium and the Netherlands) were a key European power for maritime trade, banking and business. Cities such as Bruges, Ghent and Brussels facilitated the movement of goods between Britain, Scandinavia and the Baltic regions in the north to the Mediterranean cultures and Arab world in the south. With trade and migration comes the potential for infectious disease spread, and as population centres increase in size and density, so does the ease of spread of parasites.

Brussels at this time had established itself as a political and economic centre of the region (Charruadas and Dessouroux, Reference Charruadas, Dessouroux, Dumont and Vander Brugghen2005). It counted 20 000 inhabitants in 1300 and 26 000 in 1400, with population density increasing in the decades to come (Charruadas et al., Reference Charruadas, Devos, Speleers, Boffin, Vrydaghs, Goffette, Nicosia and Larioux2017). From the 14th century onward, substantial urbanization took place, with considerable artisan activities and the emergence of brick and stone buildings (Vannieuwenhuyze et al., Reference Vannieuwenhuyze, Charruadas, Devos, Vrydaghs, Kluiving and Guttmann-Bond2015). In recent decades, there have been a number of excavations of cesspits in northern Belgium (De Clercq et al., Reference De Clercq, Caluwé, Cooremans, De Buyser, De Groote, Deforce, Ervynck, Lentacker, Mortier, Pype and Vandenberghe2007; Troubleyn et al., Reference Troubleyn, Kinnaer, Ervynck, Beeckmans, Caluwé, Cooremans, De Buyser, Deforce, Desender, Lentacker and Moens2009). The main focus of this work so far has been on dietary reconstruction based on the analysis of macro and micro botanical remains (such as seeds and pollen) and animal bones found in the cesspits, site structure and pottery analyses. Diversification of plant and animal remains found in archaeological sediments from the late Medieval period compared to earlier time periods suggest increasing trade relations with distant regions with warmer climates (Charruadas et al., Reference Charruadas, Devos, Speleers, Boffin, Vrydaghs, Goffette, Nicosia and Larioux2017). From the late Renaissance to the Early Modern Period (16th–17th century CE), the Low Countries entered into an era marked by robust trends towards political, economic and urban development, as embodied by the city of Brussels (Fernandes et al., Reference Fernandes, Ferreira, Gonçalves, Bouchet, Klein, Iguchi, Sianto and Araújo2005; Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, Harter-Lailheugue, Le Bailly, Araújo, Ferreira, Serra-Freire and Bouchet2006; Speleers and van der Valk, Reference Speleers and Van Der Valk2017).

The aim of this study is to determine the species of parasite that infected the population of Brussels during the late Medieval and Renaissance periods, in order to help us understand the health consequences of this period of mercantile expansion. While some promising parasite research has been undertaken at archaeological sites in Belgium before, these have typically focussed on individual locations. Some analyse sediment from cesspits that contain the comingled feces of different people, while others study coprolites, which are the preserved remains of a defecation event from a single person (Gonçalves et al., Reference Gonçalves, da Silva, de Andrade, Reinhard, Da Rocha, Le Bailly, Bouchet, Ferreira and Araújo2004; Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, Harter-Lailheugue, Le Bailly, Araújo, Ferreira, Serra-Freire and Bouchet2006; Rocha and Serra-Freire, Reference Rocha and Serra-Freire2009; Appelt et al., Reference Appelt, Armougom, Le Bailly, Robert and Drancourt2014), or the intestinal content residues associated with burials (Deforce et al., Reference Deforce, Van Hove and Willems2015; Rácz et al., Reference Rácz, De Ara, Jensen, Mostek, Morrow, Van Hove, Bianucci, Willems, Heller, Ara and Reinhard2015). While a number focussed their attention on the parasite remains, others primarily focussed on pollen and other plant remains, noting the parasites eggs as an incidental finding (Troubleyn et al., Reference Troubleyn, Kinnaer, Ervynck, Beeckmans, Caluwé, Cooremans, De Buyser, Deforce, Desender, Lentacker and Moens2009; Deforce, Reference Deforce2010). It is not always easy to fully compare the results found if they use different source material, varying methods of analysis and present their data in different ways. If we are able to study a number of different latrines from the same city, using the same techniques of analysis, we can interrogate the data in a more nuanced way. Hence, we have employed a comparative analysis that allows us to assess for the first time how much variation there may have been in parasite species and egg densities in different households in this part of the Low Countries, and also look for any change in infection between the Medieval period and the Renaissance.

Materials and methods

Materials

We tested for the presence of intestinal parasites in eight sediment samples dated between the 14th and 17th centuries. These samples came from three different latrines identified at excavation sites located about 500 m apart in the city centre of Brussels (Fig. 1). These sites are in Eénmanstraat (BR0166-03) and Kartuizerstraat (BR111). Samples from four layers of one brick-lined cesspit (14th–15th c.) were collected from Eénmanstraat. From Kartuizerstraat samples from two different cesspits were collected. One cesspit was unlined (14th–15th c.) and two were brick-lined (14th–15th and 15th–17th c.).

Fig. 1. Map of Brussels showing the two excavation sites in red where the analysed latrines were found, marked by red dots in the inset. The larger site to the east is where excavation BR166-03 was conducted, in which Cesspit 1 was excavated. The site to the west represents excavation site BR-111, giving rise to Cesspits 2 and 3.

The first latrine considered was a brick-lined cesspit from Eénmanstraat/rue d'Une Personne (latrine US 4067; henceforth: Cesspit 1) showing clearly identifiable stratigraphic layers (unités stratigraphiques, US). It was excavated in 2014 by the CReA-Patrimoine (Université libre de Bruxelles) and the Société royale d'Archéologie de Bruxelles in Brussels. The site is known to have represented a bustling artisan and commercial centre in the 14th–15th centuries with opulent butcheries, breweries and bakeries (Billen, Reference Billen and Diekmann1997). Excavation reports detail that Cesspit 1 was abandoned and partially demolished to enable the construction of a cellar in the 16th century, so must predate this. Two samples were collected and studied from each of two different layers; the lower layer US4139 and subsequent, marginally younger layer US4138. Both layers were composed of organic material and dated to the 14th–15th c. CE based on pottery and sandstone material recovered from the later layer.

The second latrine studied was a 14th–15th century unlined cesspit from Kartuizerstraat (henceforth: Cesspit 2), which also showed defined stratigraphic layers. It was excavated in 2010 by the archaeological team of the Brussels-Capital Region (Departement Archeologisch Erfgoed, Gewestelijke Overheidsdienst Brussel) from the foundations of the art nouveau building, the Café Greenwich, in Brussels Kartuizerstraat (excavation code BR111). There were six layers in total, containing very few archaeological artefacts, other than a few ceramic sherds dating from between the end of the 14th c. and the beginning of the 15th c. AD. Radiocarbon dating (calibrated with Oxcal v 4.3.2. Bronk Ramsey 2017) also produced dates spanning this time period. Parasitological analysis was carried out on three separate layers: US20-134, US23-45 and US24-122.

The third latrine considered was another brick-lined cesspit (henceforth: Cesspit 3), which was also excavated as a part of the project in the Kartuizerstraat (BR111). Similar to the other cesspit from this site, the initial excavation yielded few artefacts within the fill of the cesspit, with the exception of three stoneware vessels from the US39 layer. Parasitological analysis was carried out on one layer from this cesspit US 33-15, dating between the middle of the 15th c. – the first half of the 17th c. Both of the cesspits from BR111 were considerably waterlogged, which preserved the organic macrobotanical remains well enough to be used for radiocarbon dating.

Microscopy

The samples for this study were processed at the Ancient Parasites Laboratory at the University of Cambridge following our published procedures and methodologies (Anastasiou and Mitchell, Reference Anastasiou and Mitchell2013a). From each of the eight samples, a 0.2 g subsample was disaggregated in 0.5% trisodium phosphate to form an aqueous suspension for a minimum of 2 h. This suspension was then filtered through 300, 160 and 20 μm microsieves stacked with descending mesh size. Thus far, recovered helminth eggs from northern Europe have ranged from 30 to 150 μm. In consequence, the material recovered from the 20 μm sieve would contain all relevant helminth eggs. Once the sample was centrifuged, the remaining liquid was removed and the pellet mixed with glycerol to view with microscopy at 400 ×  magnification. Helminth eggs were identified by size and morphological features outlined in reference texts (Gunn and Pitt, Reference Gunn and Pitt2012; Ash and Orihel, Reference Ash and Orihel2015; Garcia, Reference Garcia2016; Mehlhorn, Reference Mehlhorn2016; World Health Organization, 2019) and previous published paleoparasitological literature. Limitations to the microscopic examination of intestinal parasites include where more than one parasite produces morphologically similar eggs (e.g. beef and pork tapeworm, human and pig whipworm), and where species produce fragile eggs so if damaged or distorted over archaeological time they may not be identifiable (e.g. pinworm and hookworm).

ELISA

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing employed commercially available kits produced by TECHLAB®. The ELISA kits which were designed to detect antigens from Cryptosporidum spp., E. histolytica and G. duodenalis have been successfully used on archaeological material for many years (Gonçalves et al., Reference Gonçalves, Araújo, Duarte, da Silva, Reinhard, Bouchet and Ferreira2002; Le Bailly and Bouchet, Reference Le Bailly and Bouchet2006, Reference Le Bailly, Bouchet and Mitchell2015; Mitchell et al., Reference Mitchell, Stern and Tepper2008). These test kits have been found to have 98–100% sensitivity and specificity in modern clinical trials of fresh feces (Sharp et al., Reference Sharp, Suarez, Duran and Poppiti2001; Verkerke et al., Reference Verkerke, Hanbury, Siddique, Samie, Haque, Herbein and Petri2015). For sample preparation, subsamples of 1 g were taken from each sample. They were once again disaggregated with 0.5% trisodium phosphate and sieved using 300, 160 and 20 μm microsieves. The material used for these tests was collected from the liquid that passed through all the sieves, hence containing material smaller than 20 μm. This is because the cysts and oocysts of these three species of protozoa are all smaller than 20 μm. Each sample was tested in eight wells on the ELISA plates, thereby having an entire column dedicated to each sample. Each plate also had a negative and positive control. Positive controls were provided with the kits. Furthermore, each sample underwent two rounds of testing on separate subsamples on two separate days in order to ensure the replicability of the results. Congruent with previous studies administered in our laboratory, the subsequent absorbance values used to determine if a well is positive or negative were measured using a BioTek Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. Limitations to the use of ELISA in excavated cesspit samples are that over archaeological time many of the fragile cysts originally present may be destroyed by soil fungi and insects, so insufficient numbers may be present in any one ELISA well to trigger a positive result in the test, and also that the antigen proteins detected in the test could change their structure due to the soil environment, again leading to a false-negative test. Therefore, the sensitivity of each test is likely to be lower than in modern clinical studies.

Results

Microscopy

Across samples and cesspits, large numbers of well-preserved parasite eggs were found. In total, six genera of helminths were identified: Ascaris, Capillaria, Dicrocoelium, Fasciola, Taenia and Trichuris (Table 1, Fig. 2). High concentrations of the fecal-orally transmitted parasites roundworm (Ascaris sp.) and whipworm (Trichuris sp.) were found in all cesspits (up to 14 555 eggs g−1 for Ascaris and 39 640 eggs g−1 for Trichuris). Zoonotic flukes of the genera Dicrocoelium and Fasciola were additionally recovered from Cesspits 1 and 3 in lower concentrations. Cesspit 1 also contained tapeworm eggs of the genus Taenia; and eggs from the nematode Capillaria sp. was found in Cesspit 2.

Fig. 2. (A) unfertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 81 μm × 41 μm). (B) Fertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 64 μm × 45 μm). (C) Fasciola hepatica egg with intact operculum, originating from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 141 μm × 71μm). (D) Taenia sp. egg from Cesspit 1 with dimensions 36 μm × 34 μm. (E) Taenia sp. egg with visible hooks in the oncosphere (dimensions: 38 μm × 34 μm). (F) Dicrocoelium dendriticum egg from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 44 μm × 26 μm) without operculum, from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 36 μm × 23 μm). (G) Capillaria sp. egg from Cesspit 2 showing the characteristic punctuated surface coat (dimensions 44 μm × 25 μm). (F) Capillaria sp. egg showing the thick wall and elongated shape (dimension 62 μm × 28 μm). (I) Trichuris trichiura egg from Cesspit 2 (dimensions 55 μm × 25 μm). Black bars indicate 20 μm.

Table 1. Summary of helminth eggs and pathogenic protozoa found in each sample analysed from the three cesspits

Notes: For each cesspit sample, the concentration of eggs is given in eggs g−1. Presence of protozoa is recorded as positive (+) or negative (-). The parasite eggs present are indicated with an X as a summary for each sample.

Whipworm eggs (Trichuris sp.) were the most common helminth found in Cesspits 1 and 2 and the second most common in Cesspit 3. Human and pig whipworm eggs have overlapping size ranges, with human whipworm being smaller than pig whipworm (Beer, Reference Beer1976). The mean length of whipworm eggs with preserved polar plugs in each of the three cesspits was 56.4 μm (s.d. 2.5), 53.6 μm (s.d. 2.7) and 56.9 μm (s.d. 2.2), respectively. The mean widths were 27.0 μm (s.d. 1.2), 26.4 μm (s.d. 1.4) and 27.5 μm (s.d. 1.3). Figure 3 shows how these measurements mostly fall within the size ranges for human whipworm (T. trichiura) or the pig whipworm (T. suis), although some outliers may potentially represent instances of the longer dog or sheep whipworm (T. vulpis or T. ovis) (Mehlhorn, Reference Mehlhorn2016). Given that all eggs were retrieved from human cesspits, the vast majority of eggs likely represent T. trichiura.

Fig. 3. Scatter plot of the measured Trichuris spp. egg dimensions across samples including the size ranges for T. trichiura and T. suis reported by Beer (Reference Beer1976). Eggs with and without preserved polar plugs are included. The cesspit of origin is specified by colour for each egg.

Roundworm (Ascaris sp.) eggs were the most numerous eggs found in Cesspit 3, and second most common in Cesspits 1 and 2. They were found in both their fertilized and unfertilized forms. Similarly, to Trichuris sp., the dimensions of Ascaris sp. vary according to the species: 45–75 × 35–50 μm for human roundworm (A. lumbricoides) and 50–70 × 40–60 μm for pig roundworm (A. suum). There is considerable overlap in these dimensions, making it difficult to reliably distinguish between the two species. As the two species of roundworm are almost morphologically identical and they are so genetically similar that each species can infect both humans and pigs (Betson et al., Reference Betson, Nejsum, Bendall, Deb and Stothard2014), we did not attempt to identify them to the species level. However, again, due to their presence in human cesspits, it is likely that they represent human infections.

Two taxa of liver flukes were also found in the cesspits. Both of these liver flukes, Dicrocoelium sp. and Fasciola sp., were identified in Cesspits 1 and 3. While F. hepatica and F. gigantica appear very similar on microscopy, the eggs recovered are most likely from F. hepatica, as it is endemic to Europe and F. gigantica is not. For the specific dimensions of eggs recovered from the cesspits, see Table 2.

Table 2. Dimensions (mean, standard deviation and range) in μm for the length and width of the species of parasite eggs identified in Cesspit 1, Cesspit 2 and Cesspit 3

Notes: The dimensions were calculated across samples per cesspit. For Ascaris sp., fertilised and unfertilised eggs were distinguished. For Ascaris sp. and Trichuris sp., measurements were from the first 100 eggs viewed. For Capillaria sp., Dicrocoelium sp., Fasciola sp. and Taenia sp., all measurable eggs were included to calculate dimensions.

Cesspit 1 yielded three eggs of the genus Taenia in two different samples. Morphologically, the Asian tapeworm (T. asiatica), the beef tapeworm (T. saginata) and the pork tapeworm (T. solium) are not distinguishable (Garcia, Reference Garcia2016). However, as T. asiatica is endemic to Asia, it is more likely these eggs with their characteristic radially striated shell and six-hooked oncosphere represent either beef or pork tapeworm. The dimensions of all three eggs were well within the modern size range of 30–47 μm (Garcia, Reference Garcia2016; Mehlhorn, Reference Mehlhorn2016; Pümpin et al., Reference Pümpin, Le Bailly, Pichler, Nicosia and Stoops2017). The mean length of eggs in Cesspit 1 was 36.2 μm and mean width was 34.1 μm.

Two Capillaria sp. eggs were found in Cesspit 2, within layer US20-134. These eggs are barrel-shaped with polar plugs, and striations or pores on the outer shell. The shape resembles that of T. trichiura but the striated surface is what allowed for distinction. Furthermore, they differ in size at 40–67 μm in length and 27–35 μm in width. The species of Capillaria could not be determined from microscopy alone. However, the pores were irregularly dispersed and rounded, which would fit with the ‘punctuated’ morphotype described by other authors (Maicher et al., Reference Maicher, Hoffmann, Côté, Palomo Pérez, Saña Segui and Le Bailly2017).

ELISA

Using ELISA analysis, G. duodenalis was present in all three cesspits, E. histolytica was found in Cesspits 1 and 2, while Cryptosporidium was absent in all cesspits (Table 1). On the first ELISA test, multiple wells tested positive for G. duodenalis for all samples from Cesspit 1 except for sample US4139(457) which had no positive wells. Similarly, multiple wells tested positive for G. duodenalis from both samples from Cesspit 2 and from the sample from Cesspit 3. Similar results were obtained on the retest using a different subsample of sediment from the cesspits on a later date.

For E. histolytica, two of the four samples from Cesspit 1 had positive wells on the first and second ELISA tests. One of the two samples from Cesspit 2 had positive wells on both tests and no wells were positive for the sample from Cesspit 3.

Discussion

This study has identified eight species of intestinal parasite as being present in Brussels during the late Medieval and Renaissance periods. Some would have been pathogenic to a significant proportion of the inhabitants (in particular dysentery), others may have caused problems in susceptible groups such as children (especially roundworm and whipworm), while the remainder may indicate false parasitism from the consumption of animal organs. We will now consider how these new data improve our understanding of health and disease in the population, whether there was a notable variation in parasitism between different family groups, and if we can identify change between the Medieval period and the Renaissance.

Which parasites dominated?

Whipworm and roundworm, together with the protozoa E. histolytica and G. duodenalis, were found throughout the population. Our identification of Medieval G. duodenalis is of note, as the previous earliest published evidence for Belgium is at 18th-century Namur (Gonçalves et al., Reference Gonçalves, Araújo, Duarte, da Silva, Reinhard, Bouchet and Ferreira2002). Whipworm, roundworm and protozoa that cause dysentery have been infecting humans throughout our evolution, but became more common as population densities increased with urbanization (Mitchell, Reference Mitchell2013, Reference Mitchell2017). The egg concentrations for Trichuris sp. and Ascaris sp. were many orders of magnitude higher than was the case for the zoonotic parasites such as Taenia sp. and Fasciola sp. Egg counts of 40 000 eggs g−1 are rare in archaeological contexts, and indicate both excellent preservation conditions and also a high intensity of infection in the original population. To put this in a clinical context, an egg concentration of >9999 eggs g−1 in a fresh fecal sample is categorized by the WHO as representing a high whipworm burden (World Health Organization, 1991). In contrast, the highest concentration of roundworm eggs recorded was 14 555 (US33-15, Cesspit 3), which falls at the lower end of the medium infection burden range: 5000–49 999 eggs g−1 (World Health Organization, 1991). Palaeoparasitological latrine soil analyses for Medieval samples from northern Europe have frequently found higher concentrations of Trichuris sp. eggs than of Ascaris sp. (Yeh et al., Reference Yeh, Pluskowski, Kalējs and Mitchell2014; Rácz et al., Reference Rácz, De Ara, Jensen, Mostek, Morrow, Van Hove, Bianucci, Willems, Heller, Ara and Reinhard2015). It is important to remember that cesspit samples contain feces from multiple individuals deposited over time, and many of the original eggs may have been destroyed by fungi and insects, so archaeological egg counts are not directly equivalent to egg count data from modern fresh fecal samples. Nevertheless, these findings would suggest that parasites spread by the fecal contamination of food and drink were the dominant group in this population.

When we compare the species of parasite present in Medieval and Renaissance Belgium with other regions, we can see that there are similarities with other towns in northern Europe, but clear contrasts with southern Europe during the same period (Mitchell, Reference Mitchell2015). In southern Europe, whipworm and roundworm were fairly common in the Medieval period, but zoonotic parasites were rare (Knorr et al., Reference Knorr, Smith, Ledger, Peña-Chocarro, Pérez-Jordà, Clapés, de Fátima Palma and Mitchell2019). It is likely that a combination of the contrasts in both climate and the dietary habits of northern and southern Europeans was responsible for this contrast. The hot weather in the south meant Mediterranean populations found fresh meat and fish went rotten quicker than was the case in northern Europe, so dishes of raw and pickled meat and fish were less common in the south than the north.

Differentiating true infection from false parasitism

Liver flukes such as D. dendriticum and F. hepatica tend to reside in the bile ducts of herbivores, including those regularly consumed by humans such as cattle, sheep, goat and deer (Garcia, Reference Garcia2016). Human infection with Fasciola commonly occurs when aquatic vegetation with encysted metacercariae is consumed without sufficient cleaning or cooking (Mas-Coma et al., Reference Mas-Coma, Bargues and Valero2018). True infections of D. dendriticum occur when its secondary intermediate host, the ant, is ingested accidentally, as they can be found on a variety of edible plants and herbs. Eggs from these two parasites can also be found in human feces in cases of spurious infection (false parasitism), after eating the uncooked liver of animals infected by the parasite (Garcia, Reference Garcia2016). Low concentrations of eggs from both species were identified in our samples, suggesting that active infections amongst multiple individuals using the cesspits were unlikely, and either a few individuals were lightly infected or false parasitism was present from eating the undercooked organs of infected animals.

The main hosts of Capillaria sp. are rodents and other carnivores. Infected animals have eggs in their feces that embryonate in the environment after approximately 5–8 weeks under damp conditions (Fuehrer, Reference Fuehrer2011). In the most common species known to infect humans (C. hepatica), the presence of eggs in human feces represents false parasitism, since in a true infection the worms deposit eggs in the liver that are not released in the feces (Govil and Desai, Reference Govil and Desai1996). This suggests that either humans using the cesspit were eating infected animal liver, or that the eggs may be present as a consequence of rodent feces ending up in the cesspit.

Variation between households

Our results show that whipworm and roundworm were consistently found in the three cesspits. Egg counts were also high in each cesspit. Some layers had higher or lower levels than others (see e.g. US24-122), and this may well result from the sampling levels including non-fecal layers rather than indicating a period of use by people not infected by parasites. For protozoa, again all three cesspits were positive for G. duodenalis, and two positive for E. histolytica. The negative E. histolytica result for Cesspit 3 may genuinely indicate its absence from those using that latrine, or result from the fact that only one sample was available for us to analyse, in contrast to the multiple layers tested in the other cesspits.

Zoonotic parasites were present with much lower egg counts. None were found in every sample, or even in every latrine. The low egg counts across the three cesspits would again indicate similarities in all users, in that zoonotic parasites were present but rare, and false parasitism from Capillaria sp. and Dicrocoelium sp. eggs was present but rare.

The patterns seen would fail to suggest evidence for notable variation in the parasite infection in different households within the city. Similarly, there was no clear evidence for change over time, with a similar pattern in the 14th–15th century and the 15th–17th century latrines. It may well be that fecal–oral parasites were common in the whole population, and zoonotic parasites present but uncommon in the whole population.

Way of life in Brussels revealed by intestinal pathogens

The health consequences of parasites in Medieval and Renaissance Brussels would vary considerably with the parasite involved. Entamoeba histolytica and G. duodenalis will cause dysentery in a proportion of those infected, and some of those would have died, especially children (Marie and Petri, Reference Marie and Petri2013). Roundworm and whipworm contribute to chronic morbidity, leading to malnutrition, stunting of growth and impaired cognitive development in some children (Dold and Holland, Reference Dold and Holland2011; Else et al., Reference Else, Keiser, Holland, Grencis, Sattelle, Fujiward, Bueno, Asaolu, Sowemimo and Cooper2020). Children would have likely been particularly badly affected as they tend to be less able to tolerate intestinal parasites, and can develop vitamin deficiencies and impaired growth (World Health Organisation, 2002). At times when food supply was low, these problems would have been more severe, possibly leading to nutrient deficiencies in those with the greatest parasite loads. Polyparasitic infections would increase this risk (Sanchez et al., Reference Sanchez, Gabrie, Usuanlele, Rueda, Canales and Gyorkos2013; Al-Delaimy et al., Reference Al-Delaimy, Al-Mekhlafi, Nasr, Sady, Atroosh, Nashiry, Anuar, Moktar, Lim and Mahmud2014).

The presence of fecal-orally spread helminths and dysentery cysts increases the likelihood that other infectious disease agents (which would not have been preserved) with the same manner of spread could have been present. Enteroviruses, hepatitis A, rotavirus, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella have all been identified as non-parasite pathogens that can be spread by fertilizing with human fecal material (Blum and Feachem, Reference Blum and Feachem1985: 5). It is likely that inhabitants of Brussels in the late Medieval and Renaissance periods may have also suffered from the effects of some of these infections.

Brussels was long notorious for its slow-flowing, putrid city river, the Senne (Deligne, Reference Deligne2015). The high concentration of fecal-orally transmitted parasites found in all three cesspits is likely linked to this. Prior to the beginnings of the city's sewage system in the 17th century, waste (including that from cesspits) was generally dumped into the Senne directly or onto the streets, where it would eventually discharge into the river. Sewage was routinely deposited into the Senne well into the 18th century (Deligne, Reference Deligne2003, Reference Deligne2016). Plans for broad irrigation with wastewater in peri-urban agricultural areas existed in the early 19th century, but were abandoned by the second half of the 19th century (Kohlbrenner, Reference Kohlbrenner2014). The Senne again came to represent the sewer of the Belgian capital, with wastewater purification only introduced in the 20th century. The heavily contaminated river, which routinely flooded surrounding neighbourhoods including that of Cesspit 1 as indicated by excavation reports, also represented a source of water that could be used by poor households. Indeed, the wells, water points and fountains on public streets implemented by the city as sources of water supply by the late 13th century (Petit, Reference Petit2016) represented a more symbolic than functional system until the 17th century (Deligne, Reference Deligne2015).

The use of human feces as fertilizer for agriculture in the vicinity of Brussels after the 13th century was also likely to have been an important source of fecal contamination of food consumed in the city (Devos et al., Reference Devos, Vrydaghs, Degraeve and Fechner2009, Reference Devos, Nicosia, Vrydaghs and Modrie2013; Vannieuwenhuyze et al., Reference Vannieuwenhuyze, Charruadas, Devos, Vrydaghs, Kluiving and Guttmann-Bond2015). This form of manuring was a common practice in Medieval Europe (Magnusson, Reference Magnusson2013). Abattoir waste was also used, creating a possible avenue for transmission of zoonotic parasite species (Ledger and Mitchell, Reference Ledger and Mitchell2019). It is likely that the fecal waste would be directly applied to fields rather than first composted for many months. This period of composting is necessary to significantly decrease transmission of whipworm and roundworm (Ziegelbauer et al., Reference Ziegelbauer, Speich, Mäusezahl, Bos, Keiser and Utzinger2012; Strunz et al., Reference Strunz, Addiss, Stocks, Ogden, Utzinger and Freeman2014). The use of human fecal material that is not correctly composted still poses a major health threat today in rural areas of developing countries due to soil-transmitted helminths including roundworm and whipworm (Blum and Feachem, Reference Blum and Feachem1985; Phuc et al., Reference Phuc, Konradsen, Phuong, Cam and Dalsgaard2006).

Taenia sp. eggs were recovered in 14th–15th century Brussels, and were present in 11th–13th as well as 15th–17th century Namur (Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, Harter-Lailheugue, Le Bailly, Araújo, Ferreira, Serra-Freire and Bouchet2006). We were not able to distinguish between the two species of Taenia tapeworm based on the morphology of identified eggs, as ancient DNA analysis of these materials would be required to identify which species of tapeworm was present at the site (Anastasiou and Mitchell, Reference Anastasiou and Mitchell2013b; Søe et al., Reference Søe, Nejsum, Seersholm, Fredensborg, Habraken, Haase, Hald, Simonsen, Højlund, Blanke, Merkyte, Willerslev and Kapel2018). The finding suggests at least partial dietary consistency in the broader region, with raw or undercooked beef and/or pork having been consumed in the city. While Cesspit 1 was close to a cattle abattoir (Billen, Reference Billen and Diekmann1997; Charruadas et al., Reference Charruadas, Devos, Speleers, Boffin, Vrydaghs, Goffette, Nicosia and Larioux2017), we know that both pork and sheep were more commonly eaten meats in Late Medieval Europe (Doehaerd, Reference Doehaerd1982; Polet and Katzenberg, Reference Polet and Katzenberg2002; Ervynck and Neer, Reference Ervynck and Neer2017).

Given the importance of the river Senne not just for Brussels itself, but also for peri-urban agricultural and piscicultural areas (Deligne, Reference Deligne2015), the absence of fish tapeworm (Dibothriocephalus sp.) in the analysed subsamples from all three latrines is notable. Dibothriocephalus sp. is a parasite frequently found in palaeoparasitological contexts where freshwater fish, an intermediate host for the parasite, figures as an important dietary component (Garcia, Reference Garcia2016). Given records for intense pisciculture of carp in 14th century Brussels (Deligne, Reference Deligne2003), and abundant archaeological evidence for fish remains, both marine, anadromous and freshwater, from late Medieval Brussels, including the Kartuizerstraat cesspits (Van Neer, Reference Van Neer, Blanquart, Demeter, De Poorter, Massart, Modrie, Nachtergael and Siebrand2001; Charruadas et al., Reference Charruadas, Devos, Speleers, Boffin, Vrydaghs, Goffette, Nicosia and Larioux2017; De Cupere et al., Reference De Cupere, Speleers, Deforce and Degraeve2018), thorough cooking of fresh fish seems the most likely interpretation.

Conclusion

This study analyses multiple latrines from the same city in order to assess diversity in parasitism between households, and to place this knowledge in the context of the lives of those who lived in Brussels during the late Medieval and Renaissance periods. High concentrations and diversity of fecal-orally transmitted parasites highlight the sanitation conditions in the city, enabling the spread of roundworm, whipworm and pathogenic protozoa that cause diarrhoea and dysentery (E. histolytica and G. duodenalis). Drinking water from the river Senne, river flooding and manuring of market gardens with human feces are all likely to have contributed to the spread of these parasite species. Eating raw or undercooked liver may have resulted in the presence of Capillaria sp., Fasciola liver fluke and Lancet liver fluke. While any consumed fish was likely thoroughly cooked as reflected in the absence of the fish tapeworm, pork and/or beef was not always adequately cooked, resulting in pork and/or beef tapeworm infections. Our study also represents the earliest paleoparasitological finding of Lancet liver fluke as well as of G. duodenalis in the area corresponding to modern-day Belgium. We found little evidence for notable diversity in parasite species between households, or between the late Medieval and Renaissance periods. This suggests a stable pattern of infection among the population of the city, dominated by poor sanitation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank TechLab©, Blacksburg, USA for donation of ELISA kits for this research.

Financial support

This work was funded in part by a Swiss Study Foundation Scholarship to AG (Jahresstipendium 2019 der Schweizerischen Studienstiftung).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Al-Delaimy, AK, Al-Mekhlafi, HM, Nasr, NA, Sady, H, Atroosh, WM, Nashiry, M, Anuar, TS, Moktar, N, Lim, YA and Mahmud, R (2014) Epidemiology of intestinal polyparasitism among Orang Asli school children in rural Malaysia. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003074.Google ScholarPubMed
Anastasiou, E and Mitchell, PD (2013 a) Simplifying the process of extracting intestinal parasite eggs from archaeological sediment samples: a comparative study of the efficacy of widely-used disaggregation techniques. International Journal of Paleopathology 3, 204207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anastasiou, E and Mitchell, PD (2013 b) Paleopathology and genes: investigating the genetics of infectious diseases in excavated human skeletal remains and mummies from past populations. Gene 528, 3340.Google ScholarPubMed
Appelt, S, Armougom, F, Le Bailly, M, Robert, C and Drancourt, M (2014) Polyphasic analysis of a middle ages coprolite microbiota, Belgium. PloS ONE 9, e88376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, LR and Orihel, TC (2015) Atlas of Human Parasitology, 5th Edn. Chicago, USA: American Society for Clinical Pathology Press.Google Scholar
Beer, RJ (1976) The relationship between Trichuris trichiura (Linnaeus 1758) of man and Trichuris suis (Schrank 1788) of the pig. Research in Veterinary Science 20, 4754.Google ScholarPubMed
Betson, M, Nejsum, P, Bendall, RP, Deb, RM and Stothard, JR (2014) Molecular epidemiology of ascariasis: a global perspective on the transmission dynamics of Ascaris in people and pigs. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 210, 932941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billen, C (1997) Enquête historique sur le quartier de la rue d'Une Personne. In Diekmann, A (ed.), Artisanat Médiéval et Habitat Urbain, Rue d'Une Personne et Place de la Vieeille Halle aux Blés. Brussels, Belgium: Archéologie à Bruxelles, pp. 1116.Google Scholar
Blum, D and Feachem, RG (1985) Health Aspects of Nightsoil and Sludge Use in Agriculture and Aquaculture: An Epidemiological Perspective. Duebendorf, Switzerland: IRCWD-International Reference Centre for Waste Disposal.Google Scholar
Charruadas, P and Dessouroux, C (2005) Histoire d'une capitale: Bruxelles des origines à 1958. In Dumont, P and Vander Brugghen, B (eds), Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Bruxelles, 175 ans D'une Capitale. Mardaga, pp. 1127.Google Scholar
Charruadas, P, Devos, Y, Speleers, L, Boffin, C, Vrydaghs, L, Goffette, Q and Nicosia, C (2017) Des champs et des bêtes à Bruxelles (Xe – XVe siècles): approche interdisciplinaire des pratiques agricoles, Et alimentaires. In Larioux, B (ed.), De la Nature à la Table au Moyen Âge: l'Acquisition des Aliments. Paris, France: CTHS, pp. 1127.Google Scholar
De Clercq, W, Caluwé, D, Cooremans, B, De Buyser, F, De Groote, K, Deforce, K, Ervynck, A, Lentacker, A, Mortier, S, Pype, P and Vandenberghe, S (2007) Living in times of war: waste of c. 1600 from two garderobe chutes in the castle of Middelburg-in-Flanders (Belgium). Post-Medieval Archaeology 41, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cupere, B, Speleers, L, Deforce, K and Degraeve, A (2018) Archeozoölogisch, carpologisch en palynologisch onderzoek van beerputvullingen op de site Greenwich, Kartuizerstraat-rue des Chartreux (BR111): voorlopige resultaten. Archaeologia Mediaevalis 41, 7377.Google Scholar
Deforce, K (2010) Pollen analysis of 15th century cesspits from the palace of the dukes of Burgundy in Bruges (Belgium): evidence for the use of honey from the western Mediterranean. Journal of Archaeological Science 37, 337342.Google Scholar
Deforce, K, Van Hove, ML and Willems, D (2015) Analysis of pollen and intestinal parasite eggs from medieval graves from Nivelles, Belgium: taphonomy of the burial ritual. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4, 596604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligne, C (2003) Bruxelles et sa Rivière: Genèse d'un Territoire Urbain (12e-18e siècle). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligne, C (2015) Bruxelles à l’épreuve de ses eaux. Inventivité hydrique en milieu urbain aux époques médiévale et moderne. Archéologie du Midi Médiéval 33, 101109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deligne, C (2016) Industrialisation, manure and water quality in the 19th century: the Senne River in Brussels as a case study. Water History 8, 235255.Google Scholar
Devos, Y, Vrydaghs, L, Degraeve, A and Fechner, K (2009) An archaeopedological and phytolitarian study of the ‘Dark Earth’ on the site of Rue de Dinant (Brussels, Belgium). Catena 78, 270284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devos, Y, Nicosia, C, Vrydaghs, L and Modrie, S (2013) Studying urban stratigraphy: dark Earth and a microstratified sequence on the site of the Court of Hoogstraeten (Brussels, Belgium). Integrating archaeopedology and phytolith analysis. Quaternary International 315, 147166.Google Scholar
Doehaerd, R (1982) Le Haut Moyen Age Occidental: Economies et Sociétés. Paris, France: Presses Universales de France.Google Scholar
Dold, C and Holland, CV (2011) Ascaris and ascariasis. Microbes and Infection 13, 632637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Else, KJ, Keiser, J, Holland, CV, Grencis, RK, Sattelle, DB, Fujiward, RT, Bueno, LL, Asaolu, SO, Sowemimo, OA and Cooper, PJ (2020) Whipworm and roundworm infections. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 6, 44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ervynck, A and Neer, WV (2017) Beef, pork and mutton: an archaeological survey of meat consumption in medieval and postmedieval towns in the southern Low Countries (Flanders and Brussels, Belgium). Quaternary International 460, 6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, A, Ferreira, LF, Gonçalves, ML, Bouchet, F, Klein, CH, Iguchi, T, Sianto, L and Araújo, A (2005) Intestinal parasite analysis in organic sediments collected from a 16th-Century Belgian archeological site. Cadernos De Saúde Pública 21, 329332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuehrer, HP (2014) An overview of the host spectrum and distribution of Calodium hepaticum (Syn. Capillaria hepatica): part 1 – Muroidea. Parasitology Research 113, 619640.Google ScholarPubMed
Garcia, LS (2016) Diagnostic Medical Parasitology, 6th Edn. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, MLC, Araújo, A, Duarte, R, da Silva, JP, Reinhard, K, Bouchet, F and Ferreira, LF (2002) Detection of Giardia duodenalis antigen in coprolites using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 96, 640643.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, ML, da Silva, VL, de Andrade, CM, Reinhard, K, Da Rocha, GC, Le Bailly, M, Bouchet, F, Ferreira, LF and Araújo, A (2004) Amoebiasis distribution in the past: first steps using an immunoassay technique. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 98, 8891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govil, H and Desai, M (1996) Capillaria hepatica parasitism. The Indian Journal of Paediatrics 63, 698700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunn, A and Pitt, SJ (2012) Parasitology: An Integrated Approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, DA, Smith, WPW, Ledger, ML, Peña-Chocarro, L, Pérez-Jordà, G, Clapés, R, de Fátima Palma, M and Mitchell, PD (2019) Intestinal parasites in six Islamic medieval period latrines from 10th-11th century Córdoba (Spain) and 12th-13th century Mértola (Portugal). International Journal of Paleopathology 26, 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlbrenner, A (2014) De l'engrais au déchet, des campagnes à la rivière: une histoire de Bruxelles et de ses excréments. Brussels Studies: La Revue Scientifique Electronique pour les Recherches sur Bruxelles 78, 113. doi: 10.4000/brussels.1224Google Scholar
Le Bailly, M and Bouchet, F (2006) Paléoparasitologie et immunologie. L'exemple d’Entamoeba histolytica. ArcheoSciences: Revue d'Archéométrie 30, 129135.Google Scholar
Le Bailly, M and Bouchet, F (2015) A first attempt to retrace the history of dysentery caused by Entamoeba histolytica. In Mitchell, PD (ed.), Sanitation, Latrines and Intestinal Parasites in Past Populations. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 219228.Google Scholar
Ledger, ML and Mitchell, PD (2019) Tracing zoonotic parasite infections throughout human evolution. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2019. doi: 10.1002/oa.2786Google Scholar
Magnusson, RJ (2013) Medieval urban environmental history. History Compass 11, 189200.Google Scholar
Maicher, C, Hoffmann, A, Côté, NML, Palomo Pérez, A, Saña Segui, M and Le Bailly, M (2017) Paleoparasitological investigations on the Neolithic lakeside settlement of La Draga (Lake Banyoles, Spain). The Holocene 27, 16591668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marie, C and Petri, WA (2013) Amoebic dysentery. BMJ Clinical Evidence 2013, 0918.Google ScholarPubMed
Mas-Coma, S, Bargues, MD and Valero, MA (2018) Human fascioliasis infection sources, their diversity, incidence factors, analytical methods and prevention measures. Parasitology 145, 16651699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehlhorn, H (2016) Animal Parasites: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, PD (2013) The origins of human parasites: exploring the evidence for endoparasitism throughout human evolution. International Journal of Paleopathology 3, 191198.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, PD (2015) Human parasites in medieval Europe: lifestyle, sanitation and medical treatment. Advances in Parasitology 90, 389420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, PD (2017) Human parasites in the Roman world: health consequences of conquering an empire. Parasitology 144, 4858.Google ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, PD, Stern, E and Tepper, Y (2008) Dysentery in the crusader kingdom of Jerusalem: an ELISA analysis of two medieval latrines in the city of Acre (Israel). Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 18491853.Google Scholar
Petit, J-L (2016) Brussels in the Middle Ages: The Brussels Files. Brussels, Belgium: Brussels City Museum.Google Scholar
Phuc, PD, Konradsen, F, Phuong, PT, Cam, PD and Dalsgaard, A (2006) Practice of using human excreta as fertilizer and implications for health in Nghean Province, Vietnam. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health 37, 222229.Google ScholarPubMed
Polet, C and Katzenberg, MA (2002) Comportements alimentaires de trois populations médiévales belges: apports de la biogéochimie isotopique. Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire 80, 13711390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pümpin, C, Le Bailly, M and Pichler, S (2017) Ova of intestinal parasites. In Nicosia, C and Stoops, G (eds), Archaeological Soil and Sediment Micromorphology. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 9198.Google Scholar
Rácz, SE, De Ara, EP, Jensen, E, Mostek, C, Morrow, JJ, Van Hove, ML, Bianucci, R, Willems, D, Heller, F, Ara, A and Reinhard, KJ (2015) Parasitology in an archaeological context: analysis of medieval burials in Nivelles, Belgium. Journal of Archaeological Science 53, 304315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, GCD and Serra-Freire, NM (2009) Paleoparasitology at ‘Place d'Armes’, Namur, Belgium: a biostatistics analysis of trichurid eggs between the Old and New World. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 18, 7074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, GCD, Harter-Lailheugue, S, Le Bailly, M, Araújo, A, Ferreira, LF, Serra-Freire, NM and Bouchet, F (2006) Paleoparasitological remains revealed by seven historic contexts from ‘Place d'Armes’, Namur, Belgium. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 101, 4352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, AL, Gabrie, JA, Usuanlele, MT, Rueda, MM, Canales, M and Gyorkos, TW (2013) Soil-transmitted helminth infections and nutritional status in school-age children from rural communities in Honduras. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, SE, Suarez, CA, Duran, Y and Poppiti, RJ (2001) Evaluation of the Triage Micro Parasite Panel for detection of Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica/Entamoeba dispar, and Cryptosporidium parvum in patient stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39, 332334.Google ScholarPubMed
Søe, MJ, Nejsum, P, Seersholm, FV, Fredensborg, BL, Habraken, R, Haase, K, Hald, MM, Simonsen, R, Højlund, F, Blanke, L, Merkyte, I, Willerslev, E and Kapel, CMO (2018) Ancient DNA from latrines in Northern Europe and the Middle East (500 BC-1700 AD) reveals past parasites and diet. PLoS ONE 13, e0195481.Google ScholarPubMed
Speleers, L and Van Der Valk, JMA (2017) Economic plants from Medieval and Post-Medieval Brussels (Belgium), an overview of the archaeobotanical records. Quaternary International 436, 96109.Google Scholar
Strunz, EC, Addiss, DG, Stocks, ME, Ogden, S, Utzinger, J and Freeman, MC (2014) Water, sanitation, hygiene, and soil-transmitted helminth infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 11, e111620.Google ScholarPubMed
Troubleyn, L, Kinnaer, F, Ervynck, A, Beeckmans, L, Caluwé, D, Cooremans, B, De Buyser, F, Deforce, K, Desender, K, Lentacker, A and Moens, J (2009) Consumption patterns and living conditions inside Het Steen, the late medieval prison of Malines (Mechelen. Belgium). Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 1, 547.Google Scholar
Van Neer, W (2001) Restes de poissons provenant de contextes médiévaux et postmédiévaux dans l’îlot Villers-Dinant. In Blanquart, P, Demeter, S, De Poorter, A, Massart, C, Modrie, S, Nachtergael, I and Siebrand, M (eds), Autour de la Première Enceinte, Bruxelles (Archéologie à Bruxelles 4). Brussels, Belgium: La Direction des Monuments et Sites de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, pp. 316325.Google Scholar
Vannieuwenhuyze, B, Charruadas, P, Devos, Y and Vrydaghs, L (2015) The medieval territory of Brussels: a dynamic landscape of urbanisation. In Kluiving, SJ and Guttmann-Bond, EB (eds), Landscape Archaeology Between Art and Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Landscape and Heritage Series Amsterdam University Press, pp. 223238.Google Scholar
Verkerke, HP, Hanbury, B, Siddique, A, Samie, A, Haque, R, Herbein, J and Petri, WA (2015) Multisite clinical evaluation of a rapid test for Entamoeba histolytica in stool. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 53, 493497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1991) Basic Laboratory Methods in Medical Parasitology. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2002) The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2019) Bench Aids for the Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasites, 2nd Edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Yeh, HY, Pluskowski, A, Kalējs, U and Mitchell, PD (2014) Intestinal parasites in a mid-14th century latrine from Riga, Latvia: fish tapeworm and the consumption of uncooked fish in the medieval eastern Baltic region. Journal of Archaeological Science 49, 8389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegelbauer, K, Speich, B, Mäusezahl, D, Bos, R, Keiser, J and Utzinger, J (2012) Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 9, e1001162.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Brussels showing the two excavation sites in red where the analysed latrines were found, marked by red dots in the inset. The larger site to the east is where excavation BR166-03 was conducted, in which Cesspit 1 was excavated. The site to the west represents excavation site BR-111, giving rise to Cesspits 2 and 3.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) unfertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 81 μm × 41 μm). (B) Fertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 64 μm × 45 μm). (C) Fasciola hepatica egg with intact operculum, originating from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 141 μm × 71μm). (D) Taenia sp. egg from Cesspit 1 with dimensions 36 μm × 34 μm. (E) Taenia sp. egg with visible hooks in the oncosphere (dimensions: 38 μm × 34 μm). (F) Dicrocoelium dendriticum egg from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 44 μm × 26 μm) without operculum, from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 36 μm × 23 μm). (G) Capillaria sp. egg from Cesspit 2 showing the characteristic punctuated surface coat (dimensions 44 μm × 25 μm). (F) Capillaria sp. egg showing the thick wall and elongated shape (dimension 62 μm × 28 μm). (I) Trichuris trichiura egg from Cesspit 2 (dimensions 55 μm × 25 μm). Black bars indicate 20 μm.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of helminth eggs and pathogenic protozoa found in each sample analysed from the three cesspits

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Scatter plot of the measured Trichuris spp. egg dimensions across samples including the size ranges for T. trichiura and T. suis reported by Beer (1976). Eggs with and without preserved polar plugs are included. The cesspit of origin is specified by colour for each egg.

Figure 4

Table 2. Dimensions (mean, standard deviation and range) in μm for the length and width of the species of parasite eggs identified in Cesspit 1, Cesspit 2 and Cesspit 3