Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:02:53.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does vitamin D during pregnancy impact offspring growth and bone?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2011

Bonny L. Specker*
Affiliation:
EA Martin Program in Human Nutrition, SWC, Box 506, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
*
Corresponding author: Professor Bonny Specker, fax +1 605 688 4220, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During pregnancy, maternal and fetal Ca demands are met through increased intestinal Ca absorption. Increased Ca absorption may be more dependent on oestrogen's up-regulation of Ca transport genes than on vitamin D status. Numerous studies, however, have found that severe vitamin D deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy leads to abnormal Ca homoeostasis in the neonate. Some, but not all, studies of maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy find a greater birth weight among infants of mothers with adequate vitamin D status. Observational studies find a higher incidence of small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants among mothers who are vitamin D deficient, but this effect may be modified by genetics. In addition, the effect of vitamin D status on SGA may not be linear, with increased occurrence of SGA at high maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations. Some studies, but not all, also have found that maternal vitamin D status is associated with growth trajectory during the first year of life, although the findings are contradictory. There are recent studies that suggest maternal 25-OHD, or surrogates of vitamin D status, are associated with growth and bone mass later in childhood. These results are not consistent, and blinded randomised trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the benefits, and possible risks, of maternal vitamin D status on offspring growth and bone development. The possibility of adverse outcomes with higher maternal 25-OHD concentrations should be considered and investigated in all ongoing and future studies.

Type
70th Anniversary Conference on ‘Vitamins in early development and healthy aging: impact on infectious and chronic disease’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2011

Abbreviations:
BMC

bone mineral content

CSA

cross-sectional area

1,25-(OH)2D

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

25-OHD

25-hydroxyvitamin D

SGA

small-for-gestational age

UVB

ultraviolet B

Fetal Ca demands during pregnancy

In order to support fetal bone development, approximately 250 mg Ca/d is transferred to the fetus during the third trimester( Reference Widdowson, Davis and Dobbings 1 ). 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH)2D) concentrations are increased during pregnancy with concentrations 150–200% of pre-pregnant values during the second and third trimesters. The signal to increase synthesis of the biologically active form of vitamin D, 1,25-(OH)2D, during pregnancy is not clear since the usual pathway through elevated parathyroid hormone concentrations does not appear to occur. Most of the circulating 1,25-(OH)2D is thought to be of maternal renal origin, but some may originate in placenta and decidua that have been shown to synthesise 1,25-(OH)2D( Reference Delvin, Arabian and Glorieux 2 ). The increase in 1,25-(OH)2D concentrations is accompanied by an increase in intestinal Ca absorption, and fractional Ca absorption is approximately 50–60% greater than pre-pregnant levels during the second and third trimesters( Reference Ritchie, Fung and Halloran 3 , Reference Cross, Hillman and Allen 4 ). The increased Ca absorption is thought to be the reason for the hypercalciuria that is observed during pregnancy. Some investigators have suggested that Ca absorption during pregnancy is not dependent on vitamin D, since intestinal Ca transport genes are up regulated by oestrogens, which are increased during pregnancy( Reference Van Cromphaut, Rummens and Stockmans 5 ). However, severe vitamin D deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy has been shown to lead to abnormal neonatal Ca homoeostasis.

Effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency on the neonatal Ca

Maternal vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy affects neonatal Ca metabolism. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteomalacia in the mother, and may lead to neonatal hypocalcaemia or tetany( Reference Daaboul, Sanderson and Kristensen 6 , Reference Okonofua, Menon and Houlder 7 ). In the early 1970s, Purvis et al. ( Reference Purvis, MacKay and Cockburn 8 ) noted that the occurrence of neonatal tetany among 112 infants was inversely related to the amount of sunlight exposure the mothers had during the last trimester of pregnancy. The authors speculated that the mothers developed hyperparathyroidism secondary to vitamin D deficiency leading to a transitory neonatal hypoparathyroidism and hypocalcaemia. This finding was reinforced by subsequent studies that reported that infants of mothers with low vitamin D intake during pregnancy had low serum Ca concentrations in cord blood or during the first week of life( Reference Paunier, Lacourt and Pilloud 9 Reference Datta, Alfaham and Davies 11 ).

Cockburn et al.( Reference Cockburn, Belton and Purvis 12 ) reported higher maternal, cord and infant 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations among 506 women who attended a clinic where supplemental vitamin D (10 μg (400 IU)/d from the 12th week of gestation) was provided compared with 633 women who attended a clinic where vitamin D was not provided. They also found the incidence of neonatal hypocalcaemia to be less with vitamin D supplementation, although this was modified by the infant's feeding: the incidence of hypocalcaemia with maternal vitamin D supplementation was 3·1 and 6·5% among breast-fed and formula-fed infants compared with 5·5 and 16·5% among breast-fed and formula-fed infants of mothers who did not receive vitamin D supplements. These observational studies were followed by several randomised trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy( Reference Cockburn, Belton and Purvis 12 Reference Sahu, Das and Aggarwal 18 ).

Several randomised trials of vitamin D supplementation (25 μg (1000 IU)/d) during pregnancy found that infants of mothers receiving vitamin D had higher serum Ca concentrations within the first week of life than infants of mothers receiving placebo( Reference Cockburn, Belton and Purvis 12 Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 ) (Fig. 1). It should be noted, however, that these studies were completed in populations at increased risk for vitamin D deficiency. The studies show the importance of maternal vitamin D status on neonatal Ca homoeostasis.

Fig. 1. Serum Ca concentrations in neonates of mothers with and without vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Lines connect means from the same supplementation trial. Populations were at high risk of vitamin D deficiency and supplemented groups received 25 μg (1000 IU) vitamin D/d during the third trimester unless noted otherwise. Dashed line is an observational study that provided 12·5–37·5 μg (500–1500 IU)/d among mothers in the vitamin D group. The dotted line is a trial that provided 10 μg (400 IU) vitamin D/d during the second and third trimesters. Data from references( Reference Cockburn, Belton and Purvis 12 Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 ).

Effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency on fetal growth and neonatal bone development

Maternal vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy may lead to impaired fetal growth and bone development. The majority of the reported studies were completed in populations at high risk of vitamin D deficiency (e.g., Asians from the Indian subcontinent living in Great Britain). Some investigators( Reference Marya, Rathee and Lata 13 , Reference Marya, Rathee and Dua 16 ), but not all( Reference Mallet, Gugi and Brunelle 15 , Reference Brooke, Butters and Wood 19 ), have reported lower birth weights among infants born to mothers with low v. adequate vitamin D status. A trial conducted in London of vitamin D supplementation (25 μg (1000 IU)/d during third trimester) among pregnant Asian women found a trend for a higher percentage of infants randomised to the placebo group being small-for-gestational age (SGA) compared with infants in the supplemented group (29 v. 15%); however, this difference in percent SGA was not statistically significant( Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 ).

Results from community-based studies that were not limited to women at high risk of vitamin D deficiency are conflicting with regard to the effect of maternal vitamin D on birth weight and length. A recent community-based longitudinal study (multi-ethnic cohort of 3730 women) in the Netherlands reported a higher SGA risk and lower birth weight in women with 25-OHD concentrations <30 nmol/l during early pregnancy (median 13 weeks gestation)( Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 ), supporting findings from studies among high risk women. A nested case–control study of seventy seven mothers who had their serum 25-OHD concentrations determined at 22 weeks gestation reported a significant association with both low (<37·5 nmol/l) and high (>75 nmol/l) maternal 25-OHD concentrations and the incidence of SGA( Reference Bodnar, Catov and Zmuda 21 ) (Fig. 2). This relationship remained significant when significant covariates were included in the analyses. This study also found an association between the vitamin D receptor genotype and SGA risk, and both maternal vitamin D status and vitamin D receptor genotype were independent risk factors for SGA. Morley et al. ( Reference Morley, Carlin and Pasco 22 ) also found an association of the vitamin D receptor FokI genotype and birth size: infants with the FF or Ff polymorphism had lower mean birth weight if their mother was vitamin D deficient compared with infants with the ff polymorphism. The FokI polymorphism did not influence birth size if the mother had adequate vitamin D status. Both the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and the Southampton Women's Study include data on serum 25-OHD concentrations during pregnancy (see more detailed description later). Neither of these studies found associations between maternal 25-OHD concentrations and birth weight or length( Reference Gale, Robinson and Harvey 23 Reference Sayers and Tobias 25 ).

Fig. 2. Unadjusted association between the probability of small-for-gestational age (SGA) births and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations among white women (A; n 273) and white women with a 25-OHD ⩽100 nmol/l (B; n 217) at <22 week. The point estimates were derived from logistic regression models with serum 25-OHD concentrations specified as a quadratic spline with knot at 70 nmol/l (P=0·006; A) or quadratic term (P<0·0001; B). The solid line represents the point estimate and the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence bands. Taken from( Reference Bodnar, Catov and Zmuda 21 ).

Fetal or congenital rickets of the newborn is rare. There are, however, case reports of congenital rickets in newborn infants of mothers with severe nutritional osteomalacia associated with vitamin D or Ca deficiency( Reference Zhou and Glorieux 26 Reference Moncrief and Fadahunsi 28 ). A case–control study by Reif et al. ( Reference Reif, Katzir and Eisenberg 29 ) reported an association between craniotabes, or delayed ossification of the cranial vertex, and maternal and neonatal 25-OHD concentrations. However, these findings have not been replicated in other observational studies or trials( Reference Congdon, Horsman and Kirby 10 , Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 ). Although Brooke et al. ( Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 ) did not find an association between craniotabes and vitamin D status, they found that infants of mothers’ who received placebo (n 67) had larger fontanelles than infants of mothers supplemented with vitamin D (n 59) that is consistent with impaired skull ossification. A study of 256 breast-fed infants conducted in China also found possible evidence of a relationship between maternal vitamin D deficiency and impaired fetal bone ossification( Reference Specker, Ho and Oestreich 30 ). The presence of wrist ossification centres in neonates was associated with cord serum 25-OHD concentrations: a higher rate of ossification centres in neonates of mothers with adequate vitamin D status (14%) was observed compared with neonates of mothers with low vitamin D status (4%)( Reference Specker, Ho and Oestreich 30 ).

There are few studies on the association between maternal vitamin D status and infant bone mineralisation( Reference Congdon, Horsman and Kirby 10 , Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 , Reference Viljakainen, Saarnio and Hytinantti 31 Reference Weiler, Fitzpatrick-Wong and Veitch 33 ). One of the original studies investigating this relationship measured forearm bone mineral content (BMC) using single-photon absorptiometry in infants of forty-five Asian and twelve Caucasian women and found that neonatal BMC did not differ by history of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and was not correlated with cord serum 25-OHD concentrations( Reference Congdon, Horsman and Kirby 10 ). Weiler et al. ( Reference Weiler, Fitzpatrick-Wong and Veitch 33 ) conducted a similar study among fifty Canadian infants and found that birth weight and length were both greater in infants with lower cord 25-OHD (with infant 25-OHD defined as inadequate at level <27·5 nmol/l) concentrations compared with adequate cord 25-OHD concentrations (defined as 25-OHD >27·5 nmol/l), findings opposite to those reported by others( Reference Brooke, Brown and Bone 17 , Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 , Reference Gale, Robinson and Harvey 23 , Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey 24 ). Total body BMC was similar between these two groups of infants, but when expressed as BMC per kilogram body weight, infants with low cord 25-OHD concentrations had lower BMC than infants with higher cord concentrations.

Mahon et al. ( Reference Mahon, Harvey and Crozier 32 ) measured femur length and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the distal femur at 19 and 34 weeks of gestation using three-dimensional fetal ultrasound in 395 women participating in the Southampton Women's Survey. They found that the maternal serum 25-OHD concentrations at 34 weeks gestation were inversely correlated to the distal CSA and a femur splaying index (CSA/femur length), with no linear relationship to femur length. These results suggest that infants of mother's with low vitamin D status have larger distal femur CSA than infants of mother's with higher vitamin D concentrations. The authors speculated based on the increased splaying index that fetal bone changes with low maternal 25-OHD concentrations were similar to what is observed in rickets. Viljakainen et al. ( Reference Viljakainen, Saarnio and Hytinantti 31 ) measured 25-OHD concentrations in ninety-eight Finnish mothers during their first trimester and postpartum period, as well as newborn bone parameters by peripheral quantitative computed tomography( Reference Viljakainen, Saarnio and Hytinantti 31 ). They found that mothers with mean 25-OHD concentrations below 43 nmol/l had newborn infants with lower tibia bone mass and smaller CSA in the midshaft of the tibia than infants of mothers with mean 25-OHD concentrations greater than 43 nmol/l. In summary, some studies, but not all, find maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy to be associated with fetal growth; this effect may be modified by genetic factors. Results from studies suggest a relationship between maternal vitamin D status and fetal or neonatal bone.

Effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency on growth and bone later in life

Longitudinal studies on the influence of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy on growth later in life are varied. The study by Brooke et al., which did not find differences in birth weight or length in a vitamin D supplementation trial (25 μg (1000 IU)/d) among pregnant Asian Indians in Great Britain, reported greater weight and length during the first year of life among infants of vitamin D supplemented mothers( Reference Brooke, Butters and Wood 19 ). Weight was greater at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of age, while length was greater at 9 and 12 months in infants of mothers who received the vitamin D supplement compared with infants of mothers without vitamin D supplements. The recent study of the Netherlands Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort found the opposite results in 2715 infants whose mothers had 25-OHD concentrations determined early in pregnancy: mean infant birth weight was lower in mothers who were vitamin D deficient, but these infants showed accelerated growth in both weight and length during the first year of life( Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 ) (Fig. 3). At 12 months of age, there was a length difference in infants whose mothers had serum 25-OHD concentrations <30 nmol/l (standard deviation score (SDS)=+0·12) compared with infants whose mothers had concentrations >50 nmol/l (SDS=−0·13). Whether this is a result of accelerated growth among the deficient group, or decelerated growth among the high-vitamin D group, or a combination of both, was not discussed. These differences in height and weight persisted even after controlling for potential covariates (gestational age, season, infant sex, maternal height, parity, maternal age, smoking, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level and duration of exclusive breastfeeding).

Fig. 3. The Netherlands Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort (n 2715) reported accelerated linear growth during the first year of life in infants whose mothers were deficient in vitamin D early in pregnancy. Differences in height and weight persisted even after controlling for potential covariates (gestational age, season, infant sex, maternal height, parity, maternal age, smoking, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level, and duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Data from( Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 ).

Two studies from England, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and the Southampton Women's Survey, were briefly mentioned earlier. Both of these studies followed cohorts of mothers and their children and obtained growth and bone measures up to 9 years of age. They also obtained measures of maternal vitamin D status, either serum 25-OHD concentrations or surrogates of ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure. These studies are described in greater detail below and are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of studies investigating effect of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy on growth and bone later in life

BMC=bone mineral content; BA=bone area; 25-OHD=25-hydroxyvitamin D; UVB=ultraviolet B radiation; ND=not done.

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children is a longitudinal study of approximately 14 000 children who are being followed from early pregnancy; analyses of growth and bone data up to 9 years of age on 6995 of these children have been reported( Reference Sayers and Tobias 25 , Reference Tobias, Steer and Emmett 34 ). Some of the mothers (n 355) had 25-OHD concentrations measured in the third trimester of pregnancy( Reference Sayers and Tobias 25 ). Sayers and Tobias estimated UVB exposure of the mothers during the third trimester from local meteorological records and these UVB estimates were found to correlate with the mothers’ third trimester 25-OHD concentrations( Reference Sayers and Tobias 25 ). They found a positive association between estimated UVB exposure and birth length, and both weight and height at 9 years of age. Estimated maternal UVB exposure during the third trimester also was associated with the child's total body lean mass, BMC and bone area at 9 years of age. However, when they examined the relationship between maternal 25-OHD concentrations and these growth and bone outcomes in 355 mother–child pairs, there was no evidence of an association with any of the outcomes. In addition, these investigators previously reported no relationship between maternal vitamin D intake during the last trimester of pregnancy and total body BMC at 9 years of age among the offspring, although they did find an associations between maternal Mg and K intakes and total body BMC( Reference Tobias, Steer and Emmett 34 ) The authors speculated that UVB was a more important determinant of maternal 25-OHD concentrations than maternal vitamin D intake. Mg content is high in vegetables, and vegetables may be consumed more often during summer months than winter months. It is possible that the association between BMC at 9 years of age and maternal UVB exposure during pregnancy is confounded by seasonal differences in Mg and K intakes, or other factors that might vary by season. In addition, the authors noted that based on these findings and previous observations that tall individuals are at increased risk of hip fracture, high UVB exposure, and thus high vitamin D concentrations, during pregnancy may increase the child's later risk for hip fracture since these offspring are taller.

The Southampton Women's Study enrolled 596 women during pregnancy and measured serum 25-OHD concentrations in 160 of these women during the last trimester( Reference Javaid, Crozier and Harvey 24 ). They found no association between maternal 25-OHD and birth weight, birth length or childhood height and lean mass (9 years of age). They did, however, report an association between maternal 25-OHD and length at 9 months of age, but a later study by this same group that included 440 mother–child pairs reported no relationship between maternal 25-OHD concentrations and length or weight at 9 months of age( Reference Gale, Robinson and Harvey 23 ). Maternal 25-OHD concentrations during the third trimester were associated with the child's total body BMC and bone area at 9 years of age and the relationship with total body BMC remained significant when height was included in the analysis. It was not clear whether other potential covariates that could influence bone, such as lean and fat mass, were included in the analysis. The authors did note that the child's activity level and Ca intake were insignificant predictors of the child's BMC at 9 years.

In summary, some studies, but not all, have found an association between maternal vitamin D status and growth trajectories during the first year of life. In addition, the studies that have found associations are not consistent. Two observational studies reported accelerated growth during the first year of life among infants of vitamin D deficient mothers, while one supplementation trial among women at risk of vitamin D deficiency found decelerated growth among infants of mother's who received placebo. Results on the influence of maternal 25-OHD or surrogates of vitamin D status, and growth and bone mass later in childhood also are not consistent.

Potential risks of high maternal vitamin D

There are several reports indicating that the relationship between mortality and serum 25-OHD concentrations is not linear, but is elevated at both low and high concentrations that have been described as a U-shaped curve( 35 ). Similar non-linear relationships have been reported for pregnancy outcomes and maternal 25-OHD concentrations. As described earlier, Bodnar et al. ( Reference Bodnar, Catov and Zmuda 21 ) found this type of relationship between SGA probability and maternal serum 25-OHD concentrations, with increased probabilities occurring at about 70 nmol/l. Potential adverse effects of high maternal 25-OHD concentrations on growth later in life also have been recently documented. Leffelaar et al.( Reference Leffelaar, Vrijkotte and van Eijsden 20 ) reported that length at 1 year of age was greater in infants of mothers with low vitamin D during pregnancy (<30 nmol/l; standardised Z score of +0·12) compared with infants of mothers with high vitamin D (>50 nmol/l; standardised Z score of −0·13). These results also could be interpreted as a decreased linear growth among the infants of mothers with high serum 25-OHD concentrations during pregnancy.

With regard to bone outcomes, Mahon et al. ( Reference Mahon, Harvey and Crozier 32 ) reported what appeared to be a U-shaped relationship between fetal femur length at 34 weeks and maternal 25-OHD concentrations, although they reported no significant association when analysed using linear regression analysis (Fig. 4)( Reference Mahon, Harvey and Crozier 32 ). Preliminary results from the Southampton Women's Study that were presented in abstract form showed a non-linear relationship between total body BMC in 211 children aged 9 years whose mothers had 25-OHD concentrations determined during pregnancy( Reference Javaid, Shore and Taylor 36 ). This study found lower total body BMC of the child at maternal 25-OHD concentrations <35 nmol/l (1·06 kg) during the third trimester compared with 25-OHD concentrations <35 nmol/l (about 1·06 kg v. 1·18 kg, respectively), but total BMC appeared to decrease at the higher levels of 25-OHD (about 1·10 kg at 25-OHD >77 nmol/l). Since it was analysed by linear correlation it was not possible to determine whether this was a significant non-linear relationship. These results indicate that low bone mass may be observed in offspring of mothers with high 25-OHD concentrations, as well as low 25-OHD concentrations.

Fig. 4. Mean femur length, geometric mean distal femoral metaphyseal cross-sectional area (CSA), and geometric mean femoral splaying index according to maternal 25-OHD concentrations in 424 mother–offspring pairs at 34 weeks’ gestation. Error bars indicate 95% CI. Taken from( Reference Mahon, Harvey and Crozier 32 ).

In addition to potential adverse effects of high maternal serum 25-OHD concentrations on growth and bone of their offspring, Gale et al. ( Reference Gale, Robinson and Harvey 23 ) also found increased risk of reported pneumonia and diarrhoea in offspring at 9 months of age, and visible eczema and asthma in children at 9 years of age. These results remained significant (P<0·05) after controlling for potential confounders.

Conclusion

Several areas of research have recently suggested a role of maternal vitamin D during pregnancy on growth and bone mass of the offspring later in life. The majority of these results are based on observational studies and require confirmation with results from well-designed randomised vitamin D supplementation trials during pregnancy. The possibility of adverse outcomes with higher maternal 25-OHD concentrations should be considered and investigated in all ongoing and future studies.

Acknowledgements

The author declares no conflict. The author was supported in part by the Ethel Austin Martin Endowment in Human Nutrition, South Dakota State University.

References

1. Widdowson, EM (1981) Changes in body composition during growth. In Scientific Foundations of Pediatrics, pp. 330342 [Davis, JA and Dobbings, J]. London: WM Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.Google Scholar
2. Delvin, EE, Arabian, A, Glorieux, FH et al. (1985) In vitro metabolism of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol by isolated cells from human decidua. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60, 880885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Ritchie, LD, Fung, EB, Halloran, BP et al. (1998) A longitudinal study of calcium homeostasis during human pregnancy and lactation and after resumption of menses. Am J Clin Nutr 67, 693701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cross, NA, Hillman, LS, Allen, SH et al. (1995) Calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning: a longitudinal study. Am J Clin Nutr 61, 514523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Van Cromphaut, SJ, Rummens, K, Stockmans, I et al. (2003) Intestinal calcium transporter genes are upregulated by estrogens and the reproductive cycle through vitamin D receptor-independent mechanisms. J Bone Miner Res 18, 17251736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Daaboul, J, Sanderson, S, Kristensen, K et al. (1997) Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant and breast-feeding women and their infants. J Perinatol 17, 1014.Google ScholarPubMed
7. Okonofua, F, Menon, RK, Houlder, S et al. (1986) Parathyroid hormone and neonatal calcium homeostasis: evidence for secondary hyperparathyroidism in the Asian neonate. Metabolism 35, 803806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Purvis, RJ, MacKay, GS, Cockburn, F et al. (1973) Enamel hypoplasia of the teeth associated with neonatal tetany: a manifestation of maternal vitamin D deficiency. Lancet ii, 811814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Paunier, L, Lacourt, G, Pilloud, P et al. (1978) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and calcium levels in maternal, cord and infant serum in relation to maternal vitamin D intake. Helv Paediatr Acta 33, 95–103.Google Scholar
10. Congdon, P, Horsman, A, Kirby, PA et al. (1983) Mineral content of the forearms of babies born to Asian and white mothers. BMJ 286, 12341235.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Datta, S, Alfaham, M, Davies, DP et al. (2002) Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women from a non-European ethnic minority population – an interventional study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 109, 905908.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Cockburn, F, Belton, NR, Purvis, RJ et al. (1980) Maternal vitamin D intake and mineral metabolism in mothers and their newborn infants. Br Med J 231, 110.Google Scholar
13. Marya, RK, Rathee, S, Lata, V et al. (1981) Effects of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 12, 155161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Delvin, EE, Salle, BL, Glorieux, FH et al. (1986) Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: effect on neonatal calcium homeostasis. J Pediatr 109, 328334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Mallet, E, Gugi, B, Brunelle, P et al. (1986) Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a controlled trial of two methods. Obstet Gynecol 68, 300304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Marya, RK, Rathee, S, Dua, V et al. (1988) Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on foetal growth. Indian J Med Res 88, 488492.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Brooke, DG, Brown, IRF, Bone, CDM et al. (1980) Vitamin D supplements in pregnant Asian women: effects on calcium status and fetal growth. Br Med J 280, 751754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Sahu, M, Das, V, Aggarwal, A et al. (2009) Vitamin D replacement in pregnant women in rural north India: a pilot study. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 11571159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Brooke, OG, Butters, F & Wood, C (1981) Intrauterine vitamin D nutrition and postnatal growth in Asian infants. BMJ 283, 1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Leffelaar, ER, Vrijkotte, TG & van Eijsden, M (2010) Maternal early pregnancy vitamin D status in relation to fetal and neonatal growth: results of the multi-ethnic Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort. Br J Nutr 104, 108117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Bodnar, LM, Catov, JM, Zmuda, JM et al. (2010) Maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations are associated with small-for-gestational age births in white women. J Nutr 140(5), 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Morley, R, Carlin, JB, Pasco, JA et al. (2009) Maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and offspring birth size: effect modification by infant VDR genotype. Euro J Clin Nutr 63, 802804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Gale, CR, Robinson, SM, Harvey, NC et al. (2008) Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and child outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 6877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Javaid, MK, Crozier, SR, Harvey, NC et al. (2006) Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: a longitudinal study. Lancet 367, 3643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Sayers, AA & Tobias, JH (2009) Estimated maternal ultraviolet B exposure levels in pregnancy influence skeletal development of the child. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 94, 765771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Zhou, H (1991) Rickets in China. In Rickets. pp. 253 [ Glorieux, FH ]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
27. Russell, JGB & Hill, LF (1974) True fetal rickets. Br Radiol 47, 732734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Moncrief, M & Fadahunsi, TO (1974) Congenital rickets due to maternal vitamin D deficiency. Arch Dis Child 49, 810811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Reif, S, Katzir, Y, Eisenberg, Z et al. (1988) Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in congenital craniotabes. Acta Paediatr Scand 77, 167168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Specker, B, Ho, M, Oestreich, A et al. (1992) Prospective study of vitamin D supplementation and rickets in China. J Pediatr 120, 733739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Viljakainen, HT, Saarnio, E, Hytinantti, T et al. (2010) Maternal vitamin D status determines bone variables in the newborn. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 95, 17491757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Mahon, P, Harvey, N, Crozier, S et al. (2010) Low maternal vitamin D status and fetal bone development: cohort study. J Bone Miner Res 25, 1419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Weiler, H, Fitzpatrick-Wong, S, Veitch, R et al. (2005) Vitamin D deficiency and whole-body and femur bone mass relative to weight in healthy newborns. CMAJ 172, 757761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Tobias, JH, Steer, CD, Emmett, PM et al. (2005) Bone mass in childhood is related to maternal diet in pregnancy. Osteoporos Int 16, 17311741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium (2011) Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
36. Javaid, MK, Shore, SR, Taylor, P et al. (2003) Maternal vitamin D status during late pregnancy and accrual of childhood bone mineral. American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Annual Meeting, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Serum Ca concentrations in neonates of mothers with and without vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Lines connect means from the same supplementation trial. Populations were at high risk of vitamin D deficiency and supplemented groups received 25 μg (1000 IU) vitamin D/d during the third trimester unless noted otherwise. Dashed line is an observational study that provided 12·5–37·5 μg (500–1500 IU)/d among mothers in the vitamin D group. The dotted line is a trial that provided 10 μg (400 IU) vitamin D/d during the second and third trimesters. Data from references(1217).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Unadjusted association between the probability of small-for-gestational age (SGA) births and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations among white women (A; n 273) and white women with a 25-OHD ⩽100 nmol/l (B; n 217) at <22 week. The point estimates were derived from logistic regression models with serum 25-OHD concentrations specified as a quadratic spline with knot at 70 nmol/l (P=0·006; A) or quadratic term (P<0·0001; B). The solid line represents the point estimate and the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence bands. Taken from(21).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. The Netherlands Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort (n 2715) reported accelerated linear growth during the first year of life in infants whose mothers were deficient in vitamin D early in pregnancy. Differences in height and weight persisted even after controlling for potential covariates (gestational age, season, infant sex, maternal height, parity, maternal age, smoking, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level, and duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Data from(20).

Figure 3

Table 1. Summary of studies investigating effect of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy on growth and bone later in life

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean femur length, geometric mean distal femoral metaphyseal cross-sectional area (CSA), and geometric mean femoral splaying index according to maternal 25-OHD concentrations in 424 mother–offspring pairs at 34 weeks’ gestation. Error bars indicate 95% CI. Taken from(32).