Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:19:23.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2024

Andrea Falcon
Andrea Falcon
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Architecture of the Science of Living Beings
Aristotle and Theophrastus on Animals and Plants
 , pp. 230 - 246
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Althoff 2005 Althoff, J, “zȏion/Tier.” In Höffe 2005: 616–620.Google Scholar
Althoff et al. 2016 Althoff, J., Föllinger, S., and Wöhrle, G. (eds.), Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption. WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, Trier, 2016.Google Scholar
Amigues 1988Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes I–II. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Amigues 1989 Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes III–IV. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1989.Google Scholar
Amigues 1993 Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes V–VI. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1993.Google Scholar
Amigues 1994 Amigues, S., “À l’origine de la botanique, les Recherches sur les plantes de Théophraste.” In Bulletin de l’academie des sciences et des lettres de Montpellier 1994; 25: 167–178 (reprinted in Amigues 2002: 3–10).Google Scholar
Amigues 1998Amigues, S., “Problèmes de composition et de classification dans l’Historia plantarum de Théophraste.” In van Ophuijsen-van Raalte 1998: 191–202 (reprinted in Amigues 2002: 45–54).Google Scholar
amigues 1999 Amigues, S., “Les traités botaniques de Théophraste.” In Wöhrle 1999: 124–154 (reprinted in Amigues 2002: 11–43).Google Scholar
Amigues 2002Amigues, S., Études de botanique. Éditions De Boccard, Paris, 2002.Google Scholar
Amigues 2003 Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes VII–VIII. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2003.Google Scholar
Amigues 2006 Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes IX. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2006.Google Scholar
Amigues 2010a Amigues, S., “D’Aristote à Théophraste: le progrès dans la continuité.” In Lehmann 2010: 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amigues 2010b Amigues, S., Théophraste. Recherches sur les plantes: à l’origine de la botanique. Belin, Paris, 2010.Google Scholar
Amigues 2012 Amigues, S., Les causes des phénomènes végétaux I–II. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2012.Google Scholar
Amigues 2015 Amigues, S., Les causes des phénomènes végétaux III–IV. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2015.Google Scholar
Amigues 2017 Amigues, S, Les causes des phénomènes végétaux V–VI. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2017.Google Scholar
Angioni 2019 Angioni, L., “What Really Characterizes Explananda: Prior Analytics I 30.” In Eirene: Studia Graeca et Latina 2019; 55: 147–177.Google Scholar
Baldassarri-Blank 2021 Baldassarri, F. and Blank, A. (eds.), Vegetative Powers: The Roots of Life in Ancient, Medieval, Early Modern Natural Philosophy. Springer, Cham, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme 1961 Balme, D. M., “Aristotle’s Use of Differentiae in Aristotle’s Zoology.” In Mansion 1961: 911–104 (reprinted in Gotthelf-Lennox 1987: 69–89).Google Scholar
Balme 1985 Balme, D. M., “Historia animalium Book 10.” In Wiesner 1985: 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme 1987 Balme, D. M., “The Place of Biology in Aristotle’s Philosophy.” In Gotthelf-Lennox 1987: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme 1991 Balme, D. M. (ed. and trans.), Aristotle’s Historia animalium: Books VII–X. Prepared for publication by A. Gotthelf. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.Google Scholar
Balme 1992 Aristotle, , De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I (with passages from De generatione animalium II 1–3). Translated with running commentary by D. M. Balme. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Balme 2002 Aristotle, , Historia animalium I: Books I–X. Text edited by Balme, D. M.. Prepared for publication by A. Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar
Barnes 19942 Aristotle, , Posterior Analytics. Translated with a commentary by Jonathan Barnes. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
Bartoš-King 2020 Bartoš, H. and King, C. G. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker 1831 Bekker, I. (ed.), Aristoteles graece. 2 vols. Academia Regia Borussica, Berlin, Reimer, 1831.Google Scholar
Bemer 2014 Bemer, K., A Philosophical Examination of Aristotle’s Historia animalium. PhD dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2014.Google Scholar
Berti 1981 Berti, E. (ed.), “Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics.” In Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum. Antenore, Padua, 1981.Google Scholar
Beullens-Gotthelf 2007 Beullens-Gotthelf, P., “Theodore Gaza’s Translation of Aristotle’s De animalibus. Content, Influence and Date.” In Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 2007; 47: 469–513.Google Scholar
Bodnár-Fortenbaugh 2002 Bodnár, I. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2002.Google Scholar
Bollansée 1999 Bollansée, J., Hermippos of Smyrna and His Biographical Writings: A Reappraisal. Peeters, Leuven, 1999.Google Scholar
Bolotin 2021 Aristotle, , Parva naturalia with On the Motion of Animals (trans. D. Bolotin). Mercer University Press, Macon, GA, 2021.Google Scholar
Bolton 1976 Bolton, R., “Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II 7–10.” In The Philosophical Review 1976; 196 (85): 514–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton 1978 Bolton, R., “Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul in De anima II 1–3.” In Phronesis 1978; 23: 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton 1987 Bolton, R., “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation and Animals.” In Gotthelf-Lennox 1987: 120–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton 2017 Bolton, R., “The Search for the Principles in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II and Generation of Animals I.” In Falcon-Lefebvre 2017: 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonelli 2012 Bonelli, M. (ed.), Physique et métaphysique chez Aristote. Vrin, Paris, 2012.Google Scholar
Bonitz 1870 Bonitz, H., Index Aristotelicus. Reimer, Berlin, 1870.Google Scholar
Bowen 1991 Bowen, A. C., Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece. Garland, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Bowen-Wildberg 2015 Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, Ch (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De caelo. Brill, Leiden, 2015.Google Scholar
Boyle 2016 Boyle, M., “Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique.” In European Journal of Philosophy 2016; 24: 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie 1996 Broadie, S., “Noῦs and Nature in De anima III.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 1996; 12: 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronstein 2016 Bronstein, D., Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig 1991 Brunschwig, J., “Qu’est-ce que ‘la physique’ d’Aristote.” In De Gand-Souffrin 1991: 11–40.Google Scholar
Bubb 2022Bubb, C., Dissection in Classical Antiquity: A Social and Medical History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat 2001 Burnyeat, M. F., “Aristotle on the Foundations of Sublunary Physics.” In de Haas-Mansfeld 2001: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell 2014Campbell, G. L., “Origins of Life and Origins of Species.” In Campbell, G. L. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014: 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capelle 1912 Capelle, W., “μετέωρος – μετεωρολογία.” In Philologus 1912; 71: 414–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter 2010 Carpenter, A, “Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus.” In Phronesis 2010; 55: 281–303 (reprinted with minor changes in Baldassarri-Blank 2021: 35–53).Google Scholar
Cerami 2017 Cerami, C., “Function and Instrument: Toward a New Criterion of the Scale of Being in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” In Falcon-Lefebvre 2017: 130–150.Google Scholar
Charles 2000 Charles, D., Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.Google Scholar
Coates-Lennox 2020 Coates, C. F. and Lennox, J. G., “Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Functions.” In Phronesis 2020; 65: 414–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code 1997 Code, A., “The Priority of the Final over the Efficient Cause in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals.” In Kullmann-Föllinger 1997: 127–143.Google Scholar
Cohoe 2022 Cohoe, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s On the Soul: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell 2016 Connell, S., Aristotle on Female Animals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell 2021 Connell, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius 2008 Corcilius, K., Streben und Bewegen: Aristoteles’ Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewegung. Walter de Gruyter, New York, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius 2011 Corcilius, K., “Aristotle’s Definition of Non-Rational Pleasure and Pain and Desire.” In Miller, J. (ed.), Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011: 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius 2015 Corcilius, K., “Faculties in Ancient Philosophy.” In Perler 2015: 19–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius 2017 Aristoteles, , Über die Seele/De anima. Griechisch-Deutsch. Herausgegeben von Klaus Corcilius. Felix Meiner, Hamburg, 2017.Google Scholar
Corcilius 2018Corcilius, K., “Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37 A 2–C 5.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2018; 54: 52–105.Google Scholar
Corcilius 2021a Corcilius, K., “De incessu animalium 5–6: The Architecture of Locomotive Bodies.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 141–164.Google Scholar
Corcilius 2021b Corcilius, K., “Soul, Parts of the Soul, and the Definition of the Vegetative Capacity in the De anima.” In Baldassarri-Blank 2021: 13–34.Google Scholar
Corcilius 2022 Corcilius, K., “Aristotle’s Generation of Animals V as a Coda.” In Föllinger 2022: 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius-Gregoric 2010Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, P., “Separability vs Difference: Parts and Capacity of the Soul in Aristotle.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2010; 39: 81–119.Google Scholar
Corcilius-Gregoric 2013Corcilius, K and Gregoric, P, “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion.” In Phronesis 2013; 58: 52–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius-Primavesi 2018 Corcilius, K. and Primavesi, O., Aristoteles, De motu animalium. Historisch-kritische Edition des griechischen Textes und philologische Einleitung von O. Primavesi; deutsche Übersetzung, philosophische Einleitung und Kommentar von K. Corcilius. Meiner, Hamburg, 2018.Google Scholar
Coren 2019 Coren, D., “Aristotle on Self-Change in Plants.” In Rhizomata 2019; 7: 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik 2009 Craik, E. (ed.), The Hippocratic Treatise on Glands. Edited and Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Brill, Leiden, 2009.Google Scholar
Craik 2015 Craik, E. M., The Hippocratic Corpus: Content and Context. Routledge, London, 2015.Google Scholar
Cunningham 1988 Cunningham, A., “Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science.” In Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1988; 19: 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gand-Souffrin 1991 Gand, F. De and Souffrin, P. (eds.), La Physique d’Aristote et les conditions d’une science de la nature. Vrin, Paris, 1991.Google Scholar
De Haas-Mansfeld 2001 de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar
Demoss and Devereux 1988 Demoss, D. and Devereux, D., “Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics II 8–10.” In Phronesis 1988; 35: 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ribeira 2019 De Ribeira Martín, I., “Seed (sperma) and kuêma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” In Journal of the History of Biology 2019; 52: 87–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi-White 2022 Doranti, T. and White, S., “Clearchus of Soli: The Sources, Text, and Translation.” In Mayhew-Mirhady 2022: 1–309.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs 1957 Drossaart Lulofs, H. J., “Aristotle’s Peri Phyton.” In The Journal of Hellenic Studies 1957; 77: 75–80.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs 1965 Damascenus, Nicolaus, On the Philosophy of Aristotle: Fragments of the First Five Books. Translated from the Syriac with an introduction and commentary by H. J. Drossaart Lulofs. Brill, Leiden, 1965.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs 1987Drossaart Lulofs, H. J., “Das Prooimion von Peri phytȏn.” In Wiesner 1987: 1–10.Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs-Poortman 1989Drossaart Lulofs, H. J and Poortman, E. L. J, Nicolaus Damascenus, De plantis. Five Translations. North-Holland Publishing Press, Amsterdam, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring 1956Düring, I., “Ariston or Hermippus? A Note on the Catalogue of Diogenes Laertius.” In Classica et Mediaevalia 1956; 17: 11–21.Google Scholar
Ebrey 2015 Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarson-Link 1976 Einarson, R. and Link, G. K. K (eds.), Theophrastus, The Causes of Plants. Volume 1: The Causes of Plants I–II. Loeb Classical Texts, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1976.Google Scholar
Epstein 2019 Epstein, K. (trans.), Aristoteles, Historia animalium Buch, V. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2019.Google Scholar
Falcon 1997 Falcon, A., “Aristotle’s Theory of Division.” In Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle and After. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 1997; Supplement 68: 127–146.Google Scholar
Falcon 2005 Falcon, A., Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon 2009 “Aristotle on the Scope and Unity of the De anima.” In van Riel-Destrée 2009: 167–181.Google Scholar
Falcon 2015 Falcon, A., “Aristotle on the Study of Animals and Plants.” In Fischer-Holmes 2015: 75–91.Google Scholar
Falcon 2017 Falcon, A, “Aristotle’s Physics I 1.” In Quarantotto 2017: 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon 2018 Falcon, A., “Aristotle: An Overview.” In Jones-Taub 2018: 181–195.Google Scholar
Falcon 2019 Falcon, A., “Definition, Explanation, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s De somno.” In Manuscrito 2019; 42: 516–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon 2020 Falcon, A., “Aristotle’s Study of Animals in Context: The Peripatetic Study of Life Reconsidered.” In König-Lindén 2020: 185–202.Google Scholar
Falcon 2021a Falcon, A., “Explanatory Strategies in the De incessu animalium.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 3–18.Google Scholar
Falcon 2021b Falcon, A., “De incessu animalium 1–3: Theoretical Framework and Beginning of the Actual Investigation.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 19–31.Google Scholar
Falcon 2021c Falcon, A., “The Reception of Aristotle’s Biology in Late Antiquity and Beyond.” In Connell 2021: 246–260.Google Scholar
Falcon 2021d Falcon, A., “La longévité comparée des plantes et des animaux selon Aristote.” In Archives de philosophie 2021; 84: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon 2022a Falcon, A., “Eternalism in Aristotle and After.” In Verheyden et al. 2022: 7–22.Google Scholar
Falcon 2022b Falcon, A., “Aristophanes of Byzantium and Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” In Föllinger 2022: 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon 2022c Falcon, A., “Aristotle, Causality.” In Zalta, E. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/aristotle-causality.Google Scholar
Falcon-Lefebvre 2017 Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon-Leunissen 2015 Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M., “Eulogos in Natural Scientific Inquiry.” In Ebrey 2015: 217–240.Google Scholar
Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021 Falcon, A. and Stavrianeas, S. (eds.), Aristotle on How Animals Move. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazzo 2008 Fazzo, S., “Nicolas l’auteur du Sommaire de la philosophie d’Aristote. Doutes sur son identité, sa datation, son origine.” In Revue d’études grecques 2008; 121: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazzo-Zonta 2008 Fazzo, S. and Zonta, M., “Aristotle’s Theory of Causes and the Holy Trinity: A New Evidence about Nicolaus ‘of Damascus’ Chronology and His Religion.” In Laval Théologique et Philosophique 2008; 64: 681–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferella 2019 Ferella, C., “Empedocles and the Birth of Trees: Reconstructing P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1565–6, Ens. D–F 10B–18.” In Classical Quarterly 2019; 69: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferella 2021 Ferella, C., “The Zoogonies of Empedocles Reconsidered.” In Rhizomata 2021; 9: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini 2012 [Aristotele, ], Le piante, edited by Ferrini, M. F.. Bompiani, Milan, 2012.Google Scholar
Fisher-Holmes 2015 Fischer, K.-D. and Holmes, B. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden. Walter De Gruyter, Berlin, 2015.Google Scholar
Föllinger 2010 Föllinger, S. (ed.), Was ist “Leben?” Aristoteles’ Anschauungen zur Entstehung und Funktionsweise des Lebens. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner, 2010.Google Scholar
Föllinger 2022 Föllinger, S. (ed.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Comprehensive Approach. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh-Gutas 1992Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 1992.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh-Sharples 1998 Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.), Theophrastean Studies: On Natural Science, Physics and Metaphysics, Ethics, Religion and Rhetoric. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 1998.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh-White 2006 Fortenbaugh, W. W. and , S. White (eds.), Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2006.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh-Wöhrle 2002 Fortenbaugh, W.W. and Wöhrle, G. (eds.), On the Opuscula of Theophrastus. Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 2002.Google Scholar
Frede 2022 Frede, M., The Historiography of Philosophy, edited by Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey 2018 Frey, Ch, “Aristotle on the Intellect and Limits of Natural Science.” In Sisko 2018: 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser-Wingate 2021 Gasser-Wingate, M., Aristotle’s Empiricism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier 1985Gauthier, R. A (ed.), Sancti Thomae de Aquino. Sentencia libri “de sensu et sensato” cuius secundus tractatus est “de memoria et reminsescentia” (Opera omnia XLV.1). Librairie Philosophique. Vrin, Paris, 1985.Google Scholar
Gelber 2015 Gelber, J., “Aristotle on Essence and Habitat.” In Oxford Studies on Ancient Philosophy 2015; 48: 267–293.Google Scholar
Gelber 2022 Gelber, J., “Aristotle on Seed.” In Cohoe 2022: 104–121.Google Scholar
Giorgianni 2006 Giorgianni, F., Hippokrates, Über die Natur des Kindes (De genitura und De natura pueri). Serta graeca. Reichert, Wiesbaden, 2006.Google Scholar
Giorgianni 2012 Giorgianni, F., Ippocrate, La natura del bambino dal seme alla nascita. Sellerio, Palermo, 2012.Google Scholar
Giorgianni 2020 Giorgianni, F., “The Hallmark of Anonymity: Questions of Authorship in the Corpus Hippocraticum, Specifically Regarding the So-Called ‘Author C’.” In Technai 2020; 11: 49–76.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith 2017 Godfrey-Smith, P., Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origin of Consciousness. Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York, 2017.Google Scholar
Gotthelf 1985 Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Mathesis Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985.Google Scholar
Gotthelf 1987 Gotthelf, A., “First Principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals.” In Gotthelf-Lennox 1987: 167–198 (reprinted as chapter 7 in Gotthelf 2012a: 154–185).Google Scholar
Gotthelf 1988 Gotthelf, A., “Historiae I: plantarum et animalium.” In Fortenbaugh-Sharples: 100–133 (reprinted as chapter 14 in Gotthelf 2012a: 390–314).Google Scholar
Gotthelf 1989 Gotthelf, A., “Teleology and Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle: A Discussion.” In Penner-Kraut 1989: 181–193 (reprinted as chapter 6 in Gotthelf 2012a: 142–150).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf 2012a Gotthelf, A., Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf 2012b Gotthelf, A., “Data-Organization, Classification, and Kinds: The Place of the History of Animals in Aristotle’s Biological Enterprise.” In A. Gotthelf 2012a: 261–292.Google Scholar
Gotthelf 2012c Gotthelf, A., “Aristotle As a Scientist: A Proper Verdict.” In Gotthelf 2012a: 371–398.Google Scholar
Gotthelf 2012d Gotthelf, A., “History of Animals I.6, 490b7–491a6: Aristotle’s megista genê.” In Gotthelf 2012a: 293–306.Google Scholar
Gotthelf-Falcon 2017 Gotthelf, A. and Falcon, A., “‘One Long Argument?’: The Unity of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” In Falcon-Lefevbre 2017: 15–35.Google Scholar
Gotthelf-Lennox 1987 Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb-Sober 2017 Gottlieb, P. and Sober, E., “Aristotle on ‘Nature Does Nothing in Vain’.” In HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of the Philosophy of Science 2017; 7: 246–271.Google Scholar
Gregoric 2005 Gregoric, P., “Plato’s and Aristotle’s Explanation of Human Posture.” In Rhizai 2005; 2: 183–196.Google Scholar
Grene 2000 Grene, M., “Recent Work on Aristotle’s Biology.” In Perspectives on Science 2000; 8: 444–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grensemann 1982 Grensemann, H., Hippokratische Gynäkologie: Die gynäkologischen Texte des Autors C nach den pseudohippokratischen Schriften De mulieribus I, II, und De sterilibus. Franz Steiner Verlag. Wiesbaden, 1982.Google Scholar
Günther-Rengakos 1997 Günther, H.-C. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Beiträge zur antiken Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann. Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1997.Google Scholar
Güremans 2015 Güremans, R., “Merely Living Animals in Aristotle.” In Journal of Ancient Philosophy 2015; 9: 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn 19932 Hamlyn, D. W., Aristotle: De Anima, Books II and III, 2nd ed. (with passages from Book I). Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar
Hardy-Totelin 2016 Hardy, G. and Totelin, L., Ancient Botany. Routledge, London, 2016.Google Scholar
Hasper 2006 Hasper, P. S., “Sources of Delusions in Analytica Posteriora I 5.” In Phronesis 2006; 51: 252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzimichali 2021 Hatzimichali, M., “The Early Reception of Aristotle’s Biology.” In Connell 2021: 228–245.Google Scholar
Hellmann 2006 “Peripatetic Biology and the Epitomê of Aristophanes of Byzantium.” In Fortenbaugh-White 2006: 329–359.Google Scholar
Hellmann 2022 Hellmann, O., “Clearchus and Peripatetic Research on Aquatic Animals.” In Mayhew-Mirhady 2022: 553–580.Google Scholar
Hellmann-Mirhady 2015Hellmann, O. and Mirhady, D. (eds.), Phaenias of Eresus: Text, Translation, and Discussion. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2015.Google Scholar
Henry 2006Henry, D., “Understanding Aristotle’s Hylomorphism.” In Apeiron 2006; 39: 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry 2013 Henry, D., “Optimality Reasoning in Aristotle’s Natural Teleology.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2013; 45: 225–263.Google Scholar
Henry 2014 Henry, D., “The Birds and the Bees: Aristotle on the Biological Concept of ἀνάλογον.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2014; 29: 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzhoff 2016Herzoff, B., “Wer war der Peripatetiker Nikolaos, der Verfasser des Kompendiums der Philosophie des Aristoteles und Bearbeiter seiner Schrift über die Pflanzen?” In Althoff et al. 2016: 135–187.Google Scholar
Hicks 1907 Hicks, R. D., Aristotle’s De anima. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1907.Google Scholar
Hine 2016Hine, H., “Philosophy and philosophi.” In Williams-Volks 2016: 13–31.Google Scholar
Höffe 2005Höffe, O (ed.), Aristoteles-Lexikon. Alfred Kröner Verlag, Stuttgart, 2005.Google Scholar
Hughes 1985 Hughes, J. D., “Theophrastus As Ecologist.” In Environmental Review 1985; 9: 296–306 (reprinted in Fortenbaugh-Sharples 1998: 67–75).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse et al. 1995Hursthouse, R., Gavin, L, and Quinn, W. (eds.), Virtues and Reasons. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husson 2012 Husson, S., “L’aporie d’une physique universelle: commentaire du Parties des animaux I 1, 641a32–b10.” In Bonelli 2012: 207–237.Google Scholar
Huxley 1877 Huxley, T. H., “On the Study of Biology.” In Nature 15: 219–224 (reprinted in T. H. Huxley, Collected Essays III: Science and Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou 2020a Ierodiakonou, K., “Theophrastus on Non-Human Animals That Change Color.” In Ierodiakonou 2020: 81–119.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou 2020b Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Psycologie de la couleur dans le monde gréco-romain. Fondation Hardt, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique, Geneva, 2020.Google Scholar
Jansen 2021 Jansen, S. R., “De incessu animalium 14–15: Teleology across Kinds.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 266–281.Google Scholar
Johansen 2006Johansen, Th. K., “What Is New in the De sensu? The Place of the De sensu in Aristotle’s Psychology.” In King 2016: 140–164.Google Scholar
Johansen 2012Johansen, Th. K., The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson 2021 Johnson, M. R., “Biology and Theology in Aristotle’s Theoretical and Practical Sciences.” In Connell 2021: 12–29.Google Scholar
Joly 1970Hippocrate, Tome XI: De la génération; De la nature de l’enfant; Des maladies IV; Du foetus de huit mois. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1970.Google Scholar
Jones-Taub 2018Jones, A. and Taub, L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science. Volume 1: Ancient Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanna 1999 Jouanna, J., Hippocrates. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1999.Google Scholar
Ju 2007 Ju, A. E., “Chrysippus on Nature and Soul in Animals.” In Classical Quarterly 2007; 57: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keaney 1968 Keaney, J. J., “The Early Tradition of Theophrastus’ Historia Plantarum.” In Hermes 1968; 96: 293–298.Google Scholar
Keil-Kreft 2019Keil, G. and Kreft, N. (eds.), Aristotle’s Anthropology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King 2001King, R. A. H., Aristotle on Life and Death. Duckworth, London, 2001.Google Scholar
King 2009King, R. A. H., “The Concept of Life and Life-Cycle in De juventute.” In Föllinger 2009: 171–187.Google Scholar
King 2016King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to the Body and the Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behavior in the Greco-Roman World. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2016.Google Scholar
King 2021a King, R. A. H., “Life-Cycles and the Actions of Nutritive Soul in Aristotle.” In Connell 2021: 127–141.Google Scholar
King 2021b King, R. A. H., “Nutrition and Hylomorphism in Aristotle.” In Korobili-Lo Presti 2021: 43–61.Google Scholar
König-Lindén 2020 König, P. and Lindén, J. I. (eds.), Aristoteles, Antike Kontexte, Gegenwärtige Perspektiven. Winter Verlag, Heidelberg, 2020.Google Scholar
Korobili 2021Korobili, G., “Aristotle on the Role of Heat in Plants.” In Korobili-Lo Presti 2021: 153–167.Google Scholar
Korobili 2022Korobili, G., Aristotle, On Youth and Old Age, Life and Death, and Respiration. With Translation, Introduction, and Interpretation. Springer, Cham, 2022.Google Scholar
Korobili-Lo Presti 2021 Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2021.Google Scholar
Kosman 2013 Kosman, A., The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann 1974Kullmann, W., Wissenschaft und Methode: Interpretationen zur aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann 1998Kullmann, W., “Zoologische Sammelwerke in der Antike.” In Kullmann et al. 1998: 121–140.Google Scholar
Kullmann 2007Kullmann, W. (trans.), Aristoteles, Über die Teile der Lebewesen. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, 2007.Google Scholar
Kullmann 2014a Kullmann, W., Aristoteles als Naturwissenschaftler. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann 2014b Kullmann, W., “Die Reihenfolge der Bücher in Aristoteles’ Historia animalium.” In Kullmann 2014a: 291–294.Google Scholar
Kullmann 2014c Kullmann, W., “Aristoteles’ Forschungsreise.” In Kullmann 2014a: 78–112.Google Scholar
Kullmann 20212 Kullmann, W., “Biologie, Zoologie.” In Rapp-Corcilius 2021 2: 118–127.Google Scholar
Kullmann et al. 1998 Kullmann, W, Althoff, J, and Asper, M (eds.), Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike. Gunter Narr, Tübingen, 1998.Google Scholar
Kullmann- Föllinger 1997 Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Akten des Symposions über Aristoteles’ Biologie. Stuttgart, Steiner Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Labowsky 1961 Labowsky, L., “Aristoteles De Plantis and Bessarion.” In Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies 1961; 5: 132–154.Google Scholar
Laks-Rashed 2004Laks, A. and Rashed, M. (eds.), Aristote et le mouvement des animaux. Dix études sur le De motu animalium. Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, Villeneuve d’Ascq Cédex, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lami 2007 Lami, A., “[Ippocrate], Sui disturbi virginali. Testo, traduzione e commento.” In Galenos 2007; 1: 15–59.Google Scholar
Lee 1948 Lee, H. D. P, “Place Names and the Date of Aristotle’s Biological Works.” In Classical Quarterly 1948; 42: 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee 1985Lee, H. D. P., “The Fishes of Lesbos Again.” In Gotthelf 1985: 4–13.Google Scholar
Lefebvre 2002Lefebvre, D., “L’argument du sectionnement des vivants dans les Parva naturalia: le cas des insectes.” In Revue de philosophie ancienne 2002; 20: 5–34.Google Scholar
Lefebvre 2016aLefebvre, D., “Le sperma: forme, matière, ou les deux? Aristote critique de la double semence.” In Philosophie antique 2016; 16: 31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre 2016b Lefebvre, D., “Aristotle and the Hellenistic Peripatos: From Theophrastus to Critolaus.” In Falcon 2016b: 13–34.Google Scholar
Lefebvre 2017Lefebvre, D., “Parts and Generation: The Prologue to the Generation of Animals and the Structure of the Treatise.” In Falcon-Lefevbre 2017: 35–55.Google Scholar
Lehmann 2010 Lehmann, Y. (ed.), Aristoteles Romanus: La réception de la science aristotélicienne dans l’Empire gréco-romain. Brepols, Brussels, 2010.Google Scholar
Lennox 1987 Lennox, J. G., “Divide and Explain: The Posterior Analytics in Practice.” In Gotthelf-Lennox 1987: 90–119 (reprinted as chapter 1 in Lennox 2001: 280–302).Google Scholar
Lennox 1991 Lennox, J. G., “Between Data and Demonstration: The Analytics and the Historia animalium.” In Bowen 1991: 269–294 (reprinted as chapter 2 in Lennox 2001a: 39–71).Google Scholar
Lennox 1996 Lennox, J. G., “Aristotle’s Biological Development.” In Wians 1996: 229–248.Google Scholar
Lennox 1997 Lennox, J. G., “Nature Does Nothing in Vain.” In Günther-Rengakos 1997: 199–214 (reprinted as chapter 9 in Lennox 2001a: 205–223).Google Scholar
Lennox 2001a Lennox, J. G., Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology. Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar
Lennox 2001b Aristotle, , On the Parts of Animals. Translated with a commentary by Lennox, J. G.. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001.Google Scholar
Lennox 2009 Lennox, J. G., “Aristotle on the Mind and the Science of Nature.” In Rossetto et al. 2009: 1–18.Google Scholar
Lennox 2010a Lennox, J. G., “Bios, Praxis, and the Unity of Life.” In Föllinger 2010: 239–258.Google Scholar
Lennox 2010b Lennox, J. G., “Bios and Explanatory Unity in Aristotle’s Biology.” In Charles 2010: 329–355.Google Scholar
Lennox 2017 Lennox, J. G., “Aristotle, Dissection, and Generation. Experience, Expertise, and the Practice of Knowledge.” In Falcon-Lefebvre 2017: 249–272.Google Scholar
Lennox 2019a Lennox, J. G., “Is Reason Natural? Aristotle’s Zoology of Rational Animals.” In Keil-Kreft 2019: 99–117.Google Scholar
Lennox 2019b Lennox, J. G., “Aristotle’s Biology.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2019 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/aristotle-biology.Google Scholar
Lennox 2020 Lennox, J. G., “Why Animals Must Keep Their Cool: Aristotle on Respiration.” In Bartoš-King 2020: 217–242.Google Scholar
Lennox 2021a Lennox, J. G., Aristotle on Inquiry: Erotetic Frameworks and Domain-Specific Norms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox 2021b Lennox, J. G., “Most Natural among the Functions of Living Things.” In Korobili-Lo Presti 2021: 3–19.Google Scholar
Leroi 2014 Leroi, A. M., The Lagoon: How Aristotle Invented Science. Penguin, New York, 2014.Google Scholar
Lesher 2010 Lesher, J. H. (ed.), From Inquiry to Demonstrative Knowledge. New Essays on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. Special issue of Apeiron 2010; 43.Google Scholar
Leunissen 2010 Leunissen, M., Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen 2014Leunissen, M., “Commentary on Henry.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2014; 29: 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen 2015 Leunissen, M, “Why Stars Have No Feet: Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Cosmology.” In Bowen-Wildberg 2015: 215–238.Google Scholar
Leunissen 2017 Leunissen, M., “Order and Method in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals 2.” In Falcon-Lefebvre 2017: 56–74.Google Scholar
Leunissen-Gotthelf 2010Leunissen, M. and Gotthelf, A., “What’s Teleology Got to Do with It? A Reinterpretation of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals V.” In Phronesis 2010; 55: 325–356 (reprinted as chapter 5 in Gotthelf 2012a: 117–141).Google Scholar
Littré 1851 Œuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, translated and edited by Littré, É. Volume 7. Paris, J. P. Baillière, 1851.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1966 Lloyd, G. E. R., Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1973 Lloyd, G. E. R., Greek Science after Aristotle. Chatto and Windus, London, 1973.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1983 Lloyd, G. E. R., Science, Folklore, Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1990Lloyd, G. E. R., “The Theories and Practices of Demonstration.” In Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 1990; 6: 371–401 (reprinted in Lloyd 1996a: 7–37).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd 1992 Lloyd, G. E. R., “Aspects of the Relationship between Psychology and Zoology.” In Nussbaum-Rorty 1992: 146–167 (reprinted in Lloyd 1996a: 38–66).Google Scholar
Lloyd 1996a Lloyd, G. E. R., Aristotelian Explorations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1996b Lloyd, G. E. R., “Fuzzy Natures?” In Lloyd 1996a: 67–82.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1996c Lloyd, G. E. R., “The Unity of Analogy.” In Lloyd 1996a: 248–259.Google Scholar
Lloyd 1996d Lloyd, G. E. R., “Spontaneous Generation and Metamorphosis.” In Lloyd 1996a: 104–125.Google Scholar
Lonie 1981 Lonie, I. M., The Hippocratic Treatises On Generation, On the Nature of Child, Disease IV. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancuso 2017Mancuso, S., The Revolutionary Genius of Plants: A New Understanding of Plant Intelligence and Behavior. Simon & Schuster, New York, 2017.Google Scholar
Mancuso-Viola 2015Mancuso, S. and Viola, A., Brilliant Green: The Surprising History and Science of Plant Intelligence. Island Press, Washington, DC, 2015 (originally published in Italian as Verde Brillante: sensibilità e intelligenza del mondo vegetale. Giunti, Milan, 2013).Google Scholar
Mansfeld-Runia 2020 Mansfeld, J and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Aëtiana. An Edition of the Reconstructed Text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. Brill, Leiden, 2020.Google Scholar
Mansion 1961 Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode. Éditions Beatrice-Nauwelaerts, Louvain, 1961.Google Scholar
Matthews 1992Matthews, G. B., “De anima II 2–4 and the Meaning of Life.” In Nussbaum-Rorty 1992: 185–193.Google Scholar
Mayhew 2021 Mayhew, R., “Theophrastus on the Mistletoe in De causis plantarum II 17, and What It Tells Us about Aristotle’s Historia plantarum VIII (IX).” In Ancient Philosophy 2021; 41: 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew-Mirhady 2022 Mayhew, R. and Mirhady, D. C. (eds.), Clearchus of Soli, Text, Translation, and Discussion. Routledge, Abingdon, 2022.Google Scholar
Mayr 1982Mayr, E., The Growth of Biological Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.Google Scholar
Menn 2002 Menn, S., “Aristotle’s Definition of the Soul and the Programme of the De anima.” In Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2002; 22: 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer 2015 Meyer, M. F., Aristoteles und die Geburt der biologischen Wissenschaft. Springer, Wiesbaden, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller 2018 Aristotle, , On the Soul and Other Psychological Works. A new translation by F. D. Miller Jr. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.Google Scholar
Moraux 1951 Moraux, P., Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote. Éditions universitaires de Louvain, Louvain, 1951.Google Scholar
Moraux 1973 Moraux, P., Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Volume 1: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I. Jh. V. Chr. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar
Morel 2000 Aristote, , Petits traités d’histoire naturelle. Translated and presented by Morel, P.-M.. Flammarion, Paris, 2000.Google Scholar
Morel 2006 Morel, P.-M., “Common to the Body and the Soul in the Parva naturalia.” In King 2016: 121–139.Google Scholar
Morel 2016Morel, P.-M., “La nature ne fait rien en vain: sur la causalité finale dans la Locomotion des animaux d’Aristote.” In Philosophie antique 2016; 16: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naas 2018Naas, M., Plato and the Invention of Life. Fordham University Press, New York, 2018.Google Scholar
Nussbaum-Rorty 1992Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. Oksenberg (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De anima. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar
Parmentier-Barone 2011Parmentier, E., Barone, F. P. (eds.), Nicolas de Damas: Histoires, Recueil de coutumes, Vie d’Auguste, Autobiographie. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2011.Google Scholar
Peck 1942Aristotle, , The Generation of Animals. Edited and translated by Peck, A. L.. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrin 1982 Pellegrin, P., La classification des animaux chez Aristote. Statut de la biologie et unité de l’aristotélisme. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1982 (translated into English as Aristotle’s Classification of Animals: Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1985).Google Scholar
Pellegrin 1995 Aristote, , Parties des animaux. Volume 1. Translated by Le Blond, J.-M.. Introduction by P. Pellegrin. Flammarion, Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
Pellegrin 1996 Pellegrin, P., “Le De anima et la vie animale.” In Viano 1996: 465–492.Google Scholar
Pellegrin 2011 Aristote, , Parties des animaux. Translated by Pellegrin, P.. Flammarion, Paris, 2011.Google Scholar
Pellegrin 2017 Aristote. Histoire des animaux. Translated and presented by Pellegrin, P.. Flammarion, Paris, 2017.Google Scholar
Penner-Kraut 1989Penner, T. and Kraut, R. (eds.), Nature, Knowledge, and Virtue: Essays in Memory of Joan Kung. Special issue of Apeiron 1989; 22.Google Scholar
Perler 2015 Perler, D., The Faculties: A History. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter 2012 Potter, P., Hippocrates, Volume 10: Generation; Nature of the Child; Diseases IV; Nature of Women; Barrenness. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.Google Scholar
Primavesi 1992Primavesi, O., “Dionysos der Dialektiker und Aristoteles über die Definition des Lebens.” In Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 1992; 135: 246–261.Google Scholar
Primavesi 2008 Primavesi, O., Empedokles Physika I. Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarantotto 2017 Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics I: A Systematic Investigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.Google Scholar
Rangos 2021 Rangos, S., “Limb-Bending and Natural Teleology.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 233–265.Google Scholar
Rapp 2019Rapp, Ch, “The Planetary Nature of Mankind: A Cosmological Perspective on Aristotle’s Anthropology.” In Keil-Kreft 2019: 77–96.Google Scholar
Rapp 2021 Rapp, Ch, “Spotting Similarities between Disparate Items: Observation on the Use of Analogy in Aristotle’s Metaphysical Thinking.” In Analogia 2021; 1: 9–37.Google Scholar
Rapp-Corcilius 20212Ch. Rapp, K. Corcilius, Aristoteles-Handbuch: Leben–Werk–Wirkung, second, augmented edition. Verlag, J. B. Melzer, Stuttgart, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed 2004 Rashed, M., “Agrégat de parties ou vinculum substantiale? Sur une hésitation conceptuelle et textuelle du corpus aristotélicien.” In Laks-Rashed 2004: 185–202.Google Scholar
Rashed 2005 Rashed, M. (ed.), Aristote: De la génération et la corruption. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2005.Google Scholar
Rashed 2011 Rashed, M., “Aristote à Rome au IIe siècle: Galien, De indolentia §§ 15–18.” In Elenchos 2011; 32: 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed 2021 Rashed, M. (ed.), Ptolémée “al-Gharîb,” Épître à Gallus: sur la vie, le testament et les écrits d’Aristote. Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 2021.Google Scholar
Regenbogen 1937 Regenbogen, O., “Eine Polemik Theophrasts gegen Aristoteles.” In Hermes 1937; 72: 469–475.Google Scholar
Regenbogen 1950 Regenbogen, O., Theophrastos von Eresos. In Pauly-Wissowa, Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplementary volume 7. J. B. Metzler, Stuttgart, 1950: 1354–1562.Google Scholar
Repici 2000 Repici, L., Uomini capovolti. Le piante nel pensiero antico. Laterza, Bari, 2000.Google Scholar
Ross 1955Aristotle, , Parva naturalia. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by D. Ross. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1955.Google Scholar
Rossetto et al. 2009 Rossetto, M. et al., Greek Research in Australia. Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies. Flinders University Department of Languages, Adelaide, 2009: 1–18.Google Scholar
Schnieders 2019 Schnieders, S. (trans.), Aristoteles, Historia animalium Buch VII und VIII. Akademischer Verlag, Berlin, 2019.Google Scholar
Segev 2017Segev, M., “Aristotle on Nature, Human Nature, and Human Understanding.” In Rhizomata 2017; 5: 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senn 1930 Senn, G., “Hat Aristoteles eine selbständige Schrift über Pflanzen verfasst?” In Philologus 1930; 85: 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples 1992Sharples, R. W., “Theophrastus on Fish.” In Fortenbaugh-Gutas 1992: 347–385.Google Scholar
Sharples 1995Sharples, R. W., Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. Commentary volume 5: Sources on Biology. Brill, Leiden, 1995.Google Scholar
Sharples 1998Sharples, R. W., “Theophrastus As Philosopher and Aristotelian.” In J. M. van Ophuijssen-van Raalte 1998: 267–280.Google Scholar
Shields 1999 Shields, Ch, Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in Aristotle’s Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar
Shields 2016 Aristotle, , De anima. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Christopher Shields. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.Google Scholar
Sier 2022Sier, K., “Analogy in De generatione animalium: Its Place in Explanation.” In Föllinger 2022: 147–178.Google Scholar
Sisko 2018 Sisko, J. (ed.), Philosophy of Mind in Antiquity. Routledge, London, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth 1920 Smyth, H. W., Greek Grammar. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1920.Google Scholar
Solmsen 1978 Solmsen, F., “The Fishes of Lesbos and Their Alleged Significance for the Development of Aristotle.” In Hermes 1978; 106: 467–484.Google Scholar
Sorabji 1981 Sorabji, R. R. K., “Definitions: Why Necessary and in What Way?” In Berti 1981: 205–244.Google Scholar
Sorabji 1998 Sorabji, R. R. K., “Is Theophrastus a Significant Philosopher?” In van Ophuijssen-van Raalte 1998: 203–222.Google Scholar
Stavrianeas 2008 Stavrianeas, S., “Spontaneous Generation in Aristotle’s Biology.” In Rhizai 2008; 5: 303–338.Google Scholar
Stavrianeas 2021 Stavrianeas, S., “Number and Distribution of Feet in Animal Progression.” In Falcon-Stavrianeas 2021: 165–193.Google Scholar
Strömberg 1937Strömberg, R., Theophrastea: Studien zur botanischen Begriffsbildung. Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, Gothenburg, 1937.Google Scholar
Takahashi 2002 Takahashi, H., “Syriac Fragments of Theophrastean Meteorology and Mineralogy.” In Fortenbaugh-Wöhrle 2002: 189–224.Google Scholar
Thompson 1910The Works of Aristotle translated into English. Volume 4: Historia animalium. Translated by Thompson, D. W.. Oxford, Clarendon, 1910.Google Scholar
Thompson 1941Thompson, G. R., Theophrastus on Plant Flavors and Odors. Studies on the Philosophical and Scientific Significance of De causis plantarum VI Accompanied by Translation and Notes. PhD dissertation. Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1941.Google Scholar
Thompson 1995Thompson, M., “Representation of Life.” In Hursthouse et al. 1995: 247–296.Google Scholar
Thompson 2008Thompson, M., Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipton 2012 Tipton, J. A., Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.Google Scholar
Towey 2000 of Aphrodisias, Alexander, On Aristotle’s “On Sense Perception,” translated by Alan, Towey. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2000.Google Scholar
Tsouni 2019 Tsouni, G., Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Eijk 2017Ph. Van der Eijk, “Arrangement and Exploratory Discourse in the Parva naturalia.” In Wians-Polanksy 2017: 179–214.Google Scholar
van Ophuijssen-van Raalte 1998van Ophuijssen, J. M. and van Raalte, M. (eds.), Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 1998.Google Scholar
van Riel-Destrée 2009 Van Riel, G. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima. Leuven University Press, Leuven, 2009.Google Scholar
verheyden et al. 2022Verheyden, J., Roskam, G, and van Riel, G (eds.), From Protology to Eschatology: Competing Views on the Origin and the End of the Cosmos in Platonism and Christian Thought. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2022.Google Scholar
viano 1995 Viano, C., Corps et âme. Sur le De anima d’Aristote. Vrin, Paris, 1995.Google Scholar
von Staden 1992 von Staden, H, “The Discovery of the Body: Human Dissection and Its Cultural Contexts in Ancient Greece.” In The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1992; 65: 223–241.Google ScholarPubMed
Ward 1998 Ward, J. K, “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in the DA II 3.” In Ancient Philosophy 1998; 8: 113–128.Google Scholar
Wehrli 19692Wehrli, F., Die Schule des Aristoteles: Heft 8: Eudemos von Rhodos, 2nd edition. Schwabe Verlag, Basel, 1969.Google Scholar
Wellmann 2020Wellmann, T., Die Entstehung der Welt. Studien zum Straßburger Empledokles-Papyrus. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White 2002 White, S., “Eudemus the Naturalist.” In Bodnár-Fortenbaugh 2002: 207–241.Google Scholar
Wians 1996 Wians, W. W. (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development. Rowman and Littlefield, London, 1996.Google Scholar
Wians-Polanksy 2017Wians, W. W and Polansky, R (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition. Brill, Leiden, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner 1985 Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet. Volume 1: Aristoteles und seine Schule. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar
Wiesner 1987Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung. Paul Moraux gewidmet. Volume 2: Kommentierung, Überlieferung, Nachleben. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
Wilberding 2022 Wilberding, J., “Spontaneous Generation, Plant and Environmental Digestion.” In Föllinger 2022: 367–390.Google Scholar
Williams-Volks 2016Williams, G. D. and Volks, K., Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2016.Google Scholar
Wilson 2000 Wilson, M., Aristotle’s Theory of the Unity of Science. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson 2013 Wilson, M. W, Structure and Method in Aristotle’s Meteorologica: A More Disorderly Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer 1838 Wimmer, F. (ed.), Phytologiae aristotelicae fragmenta. Grass, Barth, and Comp, Breslau, 1838.Google Scholar
Wöhrle 1985 Wöhrle, G., Theophrasts Methode in seinen botanischen Schriften. Grünen Verlag, Amsterdam, 1985.Google Scholar
Wöhrle 1997 Wöhrle, G., “Aristoteles als Botaniker.” In Kullmann-Föllinger 1997: 387–396.Google Scholar
Wöhrle 1998 Wöhrle, G., “The Structure and Function of Theophrastus’ Treatise De odoribus.” In Fortenbaugh-Sharples 1998: 3–13.Google Scholar
Wöhrle 1999 Wöhrle, G. (ed.), Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaft in der Antike. Volume 1: Biologie. Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 1999.Google Scholar
Woodcox 2018 Woodcox, A., “Aristotle’s Theory of Aging.” In Cahiers des études anciennes 2018; 55: 65–78.Google Scholar
Zatta 2017 Zatta, C., Interconnectedness: The Living World of the Early Greek Philosophers. Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin, 2017.Google Scholar
Zatta 2022 Zatta, C., Aristotle and the Animals: The Logos of Life Itself. Routledge, London, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zatta 2023a Zatta, C., “Early Greek Philosophy on the Question of Life: Plants’ Physiology and Life from the Presocratics to Aristotle.” In Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 2023; 73: 260–302.Google Scholar
Zatta 2023b Zatta, C., “Plants’ Bodies and the Question of Vegetal Respiration in Early Greek Philosophy.” In Ancient Philosophy 2023; 43: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zierlein 2013Zierlein, S. (trans.), Aristoteles, Historia animalium Buch I und II. Akademischer Verlag, Berlin, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker 2015 Zucker, A., “Phainias and the Naturalistic Legacy of the Peripatos.” In Hellmann-Mirhady 2015: 377–405.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Andrea Falcon, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Architecture of the Science of Living Beings
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009426374.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Andrea Falcon, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Architecture of the Science of Living Beings
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009426374.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Andrea Falcon, Concordia University, Montréal
  • Book: The Architecture of the Science of Living Beings
  • Online publication: 30 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009426374.011
Available formats
×