Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:22:43.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Pedagogical Turn in French Teacher Training The Case of the History and Geography CAPES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Christian Delacroix
Christian Delacroix*
Affiliation:
Université de ParisEst/Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM) Laboratoire EA 3350 Analyse comparée des pouvoirs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The “scientific” and “educational” questions raised by the relationship between research and the teaching of history have returned to the spotlight with the current reform of teacher training in France. Undertaken as part of the “Refounding the School System” project initiated in 2012 by minister of education Vincent Peillon, this reform accords a central place to pedagogical approaches and “professionalization.” This article analyzes some of the issues at stake in this “pedagogical turn” for the training of history and geography teachers, particularly with regard to renewed questions about the social function of history and the recurrent challenges and reservations on the part of academic historians about binding the notions of “scientific” and “educational” together.

Type
Historical Research and History Teaching in Secondary Schools
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 185 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Les Éditions de l’EHESS 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Leduc, Jean, “L’épreuve sur dossier du CAPES de 1994 à 2009,” Cahiers d’histoire immédiate 37–38 (2010): 319–36 Google Scholar, http://crheh.hypotheses.org/110.

2. Bloch, Marc and Febvre, Lucien, “Pour le renouveau de l’enseignement historique,” Annales d’histoire économique et sociale 9, no. 2 (1937): 113–29 Google Scholar.

3. On the topic of the Annales and the teaching of history, see Dumoulin, Olivier, “Les Annales d’histoire économique et sociale face au problème de l’enseignement de l’histoire,” special issue, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine (1984): 19–30 Google Scholar.

4. Bloch and Febvre, “Pour le renouveau de l’enseignement historique,” 121–22.

5. Present author’s archives.

6. Delacroix, Christian and Garcia, Patrick, “L’inflexion patrimoniale: l’enseignement de l’histoire au risque de l’identité,” Espaces Temps 66/67 (1998): 111–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Ministerial order of April 19, 2013, detailing the new organization of the CAPES, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000027361553&dateTexte=&categorieLien=id.

8. It must be added that, depending on the university and the discipline, the academic community is more or less involved in the preparation (when it exists) of the teacher recruitment examinations; some professors, for instance, are less willing than others to undertake this (daunting) task. Moreover, with the history and geography CAPES, differences in the disciplinary cultures are a further differentiating factor: academic geographers tend to be less available to participate in the preparation of the examinations than historians. All these elements (which, for want of “empirical” research into these questions, are not clearly understood) further complicate the tension between the academic and the pedagogical.

9. Vincent Duclert, “Le nouveau Capes histoire-géographie: rappel des principaux éclairages sur les épreuves d’admissibilité et d’admission,” explanatory note no. 3 (December 10, 2013), http://www.cndp.fr/portails-disciplinaires/fileadmin/user_upload/histoire_geo/PDF/Note_d_orientation_n_3_FINAL_FINAL.pdf.

10. Duclert, examiners’ report, “Concours du second degré. Capes externes. Section: Histoire-Géographie. Session 2014 rénovée,” p. 17, http://cache.media.education. gouv.fr/file/capes_ext/56/9/RAPPORT_JURY_CAPES_HIST_-_GEO_-_SESSION_2014_Renove_346569.pdf.

11. The examiners’ report is in fact a combination of several contributions: the chairperson is the main author, but other members also write parts of the document (the section on the second oral test, for example, is drawn up by two of the test’s examiners). This explains the differences in interpretation that can be detected in the various contributions, for instance concerning the link between the academic and the pedagogical elements. Even if the overall responsibility for the report lies with the chairperson, he or she cannot completely “control” (or “censure”) what the other contributors—themselves under the responsibility of their respective vice-chairpersons—write. The drafting of the report via this subtle process (or circuit, to borrow the term used by Patricia Legris), which translates informally the state of the intellectual consensus and thus the power relationships within the examining board, is difficult to decipher and remains practically invisible to readers of the report.

12. Christian Delacroix, François Dosse, and Patrick Garcia, “La professionnalisation incantatoire comme panacée pour la formation des enseignants ?,” open letter addressed to Vincent Peillon, Minister of Education, Carnet du réseau historiographie et épistémologie de l’histoire, January 2013, http://crheh.hypotheses.org/78.

13. The common core of knowledge and skills, enshrined in Law no. 2005-380 of April 23, 2005, a revised version of which was published in 2014. See the largely positive presentation of this legislation in Vincent Capdepuy and Laurence De Cock, “Satisfecit à propos du nouveau socle,” Aggiornamento hist-geo, June 30, 2014, http://aggiornamento.hypotheses.org/2181.

14. See Legris, Patricia, “On n’enseigne plus l’histoire à nos enfants ! Retour sur la polémique de l’enseignement de l’histoire en France au tournant des années 1970-1980,” in Barroche, Julien, Bouëdec, Nathalie Le, and Pons, Xavier, eds., Les figures de l’État éducateur. Pour une approche pluridisciplinaire (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2008), 197–224 Google Scholar.

15. Prost, Antoine, quoted in Garcia, Patrick and Leduc, Jean, L’enseignement de l’histoire en France, de l’Ancien Régime à nos jours (Paris: Armand Colin, 2004), 213 Google Scholar.

16. De Cock, Laurence and Picard, Emmanuelle, eds., La fabrique scolaire de l’histoire. Illusions et désillusions du roman national (Marseille: Agone, 2009)Google Scholar; Chambarlhac, Vincent, “Les prémisses d’une restauration? L’histoire enseignée saisie par le politique,” Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société 16, no. 1 (2012): 187–202 Google Scholar.

17. Nora, Pierre, “Difficile enseignement de l’histoire,” Le Débat 175 (2013): 3–6, citation p. 4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On this issue of Le Débat see Vincent Capdepuy, “Le déni du monde,” Aggiornamento hist-geo, June 17, 2013, http://aggiornamento.hypotheses.org/1453; Citron, Suzanne, “Difficile enseignement de l’histoire? Le Débat 175, un dossier contrasté,” Aggiornamento hist-geo, September 6, 2013 Google Scholar, http://aggiornamento.hypotheses.org/1565.

18. Bloch, Marc, “Sur la réforme de l’enseignement,” note written for publication in Cahiers politiques (1944)Google Scholar, cited in Bloch, Marc, L’histoire, la guerre, la Résistance, ed. Annette Becker and Étienne Bloch, (Paris: Gallimard, 2006), 790–91 Google Scholar.

19. Grandazzi, Maurice, “Les journées d’études pour l’enseignement de l’histoire (13, 14 et 15 juillet 1947),” Revue universitaire 4 (July–October 1947)Google Scholar, cited in Legris, Patricia, “L’écriture des programmes d’histoire en France (1944–2010). Sociologie historique de la production d’un instrument d’une politique éducative” (PhD diss., University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 2010), 95 Google Scholar, available at http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00579269/. This dissertation has been published in an abridged version: Legris, , Qui écrit les programmes d’histoire? (Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble, 2014)Google Scholar.

20. Delacroix and Garcia, “L’inflexion patrimoniale.”

21. Patricia Legris, “La marginalisation des universitaires,” in Legris, “L’écriture des programmes d’histoire en France,” 160–73.

22. Braudel, Fernand, L’histoire au quotidien (Paris: Éd. de Fallois, 2001), 120 Google Scholar, cited in Legris, “L’écriture des programmes d’histoire en France,” 173.

23. Bloch, Marc, The Historian’s Craft, trans. Putnam, Peter (New York: Vintage, 1953), 9 Google Scholar.

24. Jacomino, Baptiste, “La controverse française sur l’école: essai de cartographie,” Le philosophoire 33, no. 1 (2010): 57–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a critical viewpoint on the “anti-pedagogical” tradition see Kahn, Pierre, “La critique du ‘pédagogisme’ ou l’invention du discours de l’autre,” Les sciences de l’éducation. Pour l’Ère nouvelle 39, no. 4 (2006): 81–98 Google Scholar.

25. See in particular Lautier, Nicole, À la rencontre de l’histoire (Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 1997)Google Scholar and Cariou, Didier, Écrire l’histoire scolaire. Quand les élèves écrivent en classe pour apprendre l’histoire (Rennes: PUR, 2012)Google Scholar.

26. Allieu-Mary, Nicole, “De l’histoire des chercheurs à l’histoire scolaire,” in Develay, Michel, ed., Savoirs scolaires et didactiques des disciplines: une encyclopédie pour aujourd’hui (Paris: ESF éditeur, 1995) 123–61, here pp. 143–44Google Scholar.

27. Chaunu, Pierre, Histoire quantitative, histoire sérielle (Paris: Armand Colin, 1978), 10 Google Scholar.

28. Wieviorka, Annette, “L’enseignement de l’histoire en question,” Études 11, no. 417 (2012): 475–83 Google Scholar; Benoît Falaize and Absalon, Olivier, “La Grande Guerre des manuels scolaires: entretien avec Nicolas Offenstadt,” Collectif de Recherche International et de Débat sur la Guerre de 1914-1918, 2015 Google Scholar, http://crid1418.org/espace_pedagogique/documents/ entretien_no.html.

29. Cited in Legris, “L’écriture des programmes d’histoire en France,” 96.

30. It should be noted that academics regularly participate in the writing of secondary-school textbooks.

31. Akrich, Madeleine, Callon, Michel, and Latour, Bruno, Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs (Paris: Presses des Mines, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. Lantheaume, Françoise, “Solidité et instabilité du curriculum d’histoire en France: accumulation de ressources et allongement des réseaux,” Éducation et sociétés 12, no. 2 (2003): 125–42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On these points, see the article by Laurence De Cock in this issue of the Annales .