Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-vfwnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T07:13:03.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three-dimensional bursting process and turbulent coherent structure within scour holes at various development stages around a cylindrical structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2024

Krishna Pada Bauri
Affiliation:
School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, 752050 Odisha, India Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 752054 Odisha, India
Arindam Sarkar
Affiliation:
School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, 752050 Odisha, India
Michael Nones*
Affiliation:
Hydrology and Hydrodynamics Department, Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-452 Warsaw, Poland
*
Email address for correspondence [email protected]

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2-D) quadrant analysis is generally used for investigating flow and sediment dynamics around a rigid structure in open channel flows. Given that particle distribution around rigid obstacles is not spatially uniform and changes in time, while vortices evolve to become three-dimensional (3-D) structures, 2-D quadrant analysis might be unsuitable to completely determine the sediment transport. Hence, 3-D quadrant and 3-D octant analyses should be considered, using the 3-D instantaneous velocity data and relative 3-D bursting process to define sediment transport surrounding the submerged square and circular cylinders. The turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), transition probabilities, occurrence probabilities, stress fraction and angles of inclination of 3-D bursting events are considered to quantify the coherent structures surrounding the cylinders and their interaction with bed particles. Experiments were conducted at the Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering Laboratory, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, and velocity data were recorded at different cross-sections around the submerged cylinders using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. Results show that the TKE is greater for internal ejection, external ejection, and internal sweep, external sweep in the upstream of the circular and square cylindrical structures. On the other part, the TKE is significant for internal ejection, external ejection, and internal sweep, external sweep in the downstream of the aligned square cylindrical structures, which justifies the highest scour depth that occurred upstream of the circular and square cylindrical structures and downstream of the aligned square cylindrical structure. The transition probability of the bursting events was determined using the Markov process from the measured velocity data to investigate the consecutive occurrence of bursting events. Further, the importance of sweeps and ejections on sediment erosion surrounding the cylinders within the scour hole at various stages of its development was investigated via 3-D quadrant analysis of the bursting occurrences. The outcomes show that external sweep and internal ejection events are active mechanisms for bed particle transport surrounding the cylinder. The maximum transition probability values are found around aligned cylindrical structures in comparison with the circular and square cylindrical structures in the transverse direction. This depicts the formation of a trailing vortex on both sides of the aligned square cylindrical object. The results reveal that the effect of inclination angles with respect to the water flow is greater for internal ejection and external sweep from upstream to downstream within the scour hole surrounding the cylindrical structures at various phases of development as horseshoe vortices and downflow develop upstream of the cylindrical structures while trailing vortices and wake vortices form at the top and downstream of the cylindrical structures. Internal and external ejection have a higher stress fraction than an internal and external sweep for square cylinders with alignment angles of 0°, 20° and circular cylinders over underdeveloped and developed scoured beds, respectively. With the higher percentage of fractional contributions for internal sweeps, the external sweep is predicted close to the cylindrical objects in comparison with the internal ejection and external ejection events because of the formation and warping of the horseshoe vortex close to the cylindrical objects, suggesting a significant probability of 3-D bursting occurrences with sediment movement near the cylindrical structures.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashtiani, B.A. & Kordkandi, A. 2013 Flow field around single and tandem piers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 90, 471490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauri, K.P. 2022 Coherent structures around submerged circular and square cylinders due to change of orientation angle in steady current over plane bed. Acta Geophys. 70 (5), 22232250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauri, K.P. & Sarkar, A. 2019 Turbulent burst-sweep events around fully submerged vertical square cylinder over plane bed. Environ. Fluid Mech. 19, 645666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauri, K.P. & Sarkar, A. 2020 Turbulent bursting events within equilibrium scour holes around aligned submerged cylinder. J. Turbul. 21 (2), 5383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauri, K.P. & Sarkar, A. 2022 Experimental and numerical simulation of flow around bottom mounted submerged vertical circular cylinder over rigid plane bed. In Recent Advances in Computational and Experimental Mechanics, Vol. I (ed. Maity, D. et al.), Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, pp. 153165. Springer.Google Scholar
Beheshti, A.A. & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. 2008 Analysis of threshold and incipient conditions for sediment movement. Coast. Engng 55 (5), 423430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beheshti, A.A. & Ataie-Ashtiani, B. 2016 Scour hole influence on turbulent flow field around complex bridge piers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 97, 451474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, C., Aubrun, S., Goossens, T. & Ravier, P. 2008 Coherent structures and their frequency signature in the separated shear layer on the sides of a square cylinder. Flow Turbul. Combust. 81, 97114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiew, Y.-M. & Melville, B.W. 1987 Local scour around bridge piers. J. Hydraul Res. 25 (1), 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S. & Mazumdar, A. 2015 Turbulence flow field around two eccentric circular piers in scour hole. Intl J. River Basin Manage. 13 (3), 343361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P.A. 2015 Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/turbulence-9780198722595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devi, K., Hanmaiahgari, P.R., Balachandar, R. & Pu, J.H. 2021 Self-preservation of turbulence statistics in the wall-wake flow of a bed-mounted horizontal pipe. Fluids 6 (12), 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, S., Lodh, R. & Sarkar, S. 2018 a Turbulence characteristics in wall-wake flows downstream of wall-mounted and near-wall horizontal cylinders. Environ. Fluid Mech. 18, 891921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, S., Swargiary, D., Sarkar, S., Fang, H. & Gaudio, R. 2018 b Turbulence features in a wall-wake flow downstream of a wall-mounted vertical cylinder. Eur. J. Mech. - B/Fluids 69, 4661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diplas, P. & Dancey, C.L. 2013 Coherent flow structures, initiation of motion, sediment transport and morphological feedbacks in rivers. In Coherent Flow Structures at Earth's Surface, pp. 289307. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diplas, P., Dancey, C.L., Celik, A.O., Valyrakis, M., Greer, K. & Akar, T. 2008 The role of impulse on the initiation of particle movement under turbulent flow conditions. Science 322 (5902), 717720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, H., Chen, L., Du, X., Fang, L. & Jin, X. 2022 Effects of corner chamfers on the extreme pressures on a square cylinder at incidence to a uniform flow. Comput. Fluids 244, 105539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, S., Wu, G., Liang, B., Zhu, D.Z. & Wang, R. 2022 Scour at a submerged square pile in various flow depths under steady flow. Water 14 (13), 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esfahani, F.S. & Keshavarzi, A. 2013 Dynamic mechanism of turbulent flow in meandering channels: considerations for deflection angle. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 27, 10931114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, J., Guojian He, G., Huang, L., Dey, S. & Fang, H. 2023 Swaying motions of submerged flexible vegetation. J. Fluid Mech 971, A14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franzetti, S., Radice, A., Rebai, D. & Ballio, F. 2022 Clear water scour at circular piers: a new formula fitting laboratory data with less than 25 % deviation. J. Hydraul. Engng 148 (10), 04022021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Hutchins, N., Hambleton, W.T., Longmire, E.K. & Marusic, I. 2005 Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations. J. Fluid. Mech. 524, 5780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, P., Eldho, T.I., Mazumder, B.S. & Behera, M.R. 2022 Turbulent flow characteristics responsible for current-induced scour around a complex pier. Can. J. Civil Engng 49 (4), 597606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerami, E., Heidarpour, M. & Ghalati, R.M. 2022 Effect of simultaneous use of cable and bed sill countermeasures on local scour around a cylindrical pier. Proc. Inst. Civ. Engng Water Manage. 176 (6). Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
Huang, C.H., Tsai, C.W. & Mousavi, S.M. 2021 Quantification of probabilistic concentrations for mixed-size sediment particles in open channel flow. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 35, 419435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikani, N., Pu, J.H., Taha, T., Hanmaiahgarib, P.R. & Penna, N. 2023 Bursting phenomenon created by bridge piers group in open channel flow. Environ. Fluid Mech. 23 (1), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadinia, E., Heidarpour, M. & Schleiss, A.J. 2013 Investigation of turbulence flow and sediment entrainment around a bridge pier. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 27, 13031314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshavarzi, A., Melville, B. & Ball, J. 2014 Three-dimensional analysis of coherent turbulent flow structure around a single circular bridge pier. Environ. Fluid Mech. 14, 821847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A., Sharma, N., Garg, R. & Biswas, T. 2022 a Contribution of quadrant bursting events to the turbulent flow structure at region close to the mid-channel bar. ISH J. Hydraul. Engng 28 (4), 410419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A., Sharma, N., Lama, G.F.C., Hasan, M., Garg, R., Busico, G. & Alharbi, R.S. 2022 b Three-Dimensional Hole Size (3DHS) approach for water flow turbulence analysis over emerging sand bars: flume-scale experiments. Water 14 (12), 1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M.A., Sharma, N., Pu, J., Aamir, M. & Pandey, M. 2021 Two-dimensional turbulent burst examination and angle ratio utilization to detect scouring/sedimentation around mid-channel bar. Acta Geophys. 69 (4), 13351348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. & Kothyari, U.C. 2012 Three-dimensional flow characteristics within the scour hole around circular uniform and compound piers. J. Hydraul. Engng 138 (5), 420429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lança, R., Fael, C., Maia, R., Pêgo, J.P. & Cardoso, A.H. 2013 Clear-water scour at pile groups. J. Hydraul. Engng 139 (10), 10891098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Alobaidi, K. & Valyrakis, M. 2022 The assessment of an acoustic Doppler velocimetry profiler from a user's perspective. Acta Geophys. 70 (5), 22972310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, J.Y., Hong, J.H., Su, C.C., Wang, C.Y. & Lai, J.S. 2008 Field measurements and simulation of bridge scour depth variations during floods. J. Hydraul. Engng 134 (6), 810821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, K., Si, Y., Lu, S., Liang, B. & Qi, H. 2022 Characteristics of reducing local scour around cylindrical pier using a horn-shaped collar. J. Engng Appl. Sci. 69 (1), 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maity, H. & Mazumder, B.S. 2017 Prediction of plane-wise turbulent events to the Reynolds stress in a flow over scour-bed. Environmetrics 28 (4), e2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manes, C. & Brocchini, M. 2015 Local scour around structures and the phenomenology of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 779, 309–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattioli, M., Alsina, J.M., Mancinelli, A., Miozzi, M. & Brocchini, M. 2012 Experimental investigation of the nearbed dynamics around a submarine pipeline laying on different types of seabed: the interaction between turbulent structures and particles. Adv. Water Res. 48, 3146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miozzi, M., Corvaro, S., Pereira, F.A. & Brocchini, M. 2019 Wave-induced morphodynamics and sediment transport around a slender vertical cylinder. Adv. Water Res. 129, 263280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J.M., Shreve, R.L., McLean, S.R. & Drake, T.G. 1995 Role of near-bed turbulence structure in bed load transport and bed form mechanics. Water Resour. Res. 31 (8), 20712086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. & Rodi, W. 1986 Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. J. Hydraul. Engng 112 (5), 335355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przyborowski, Ł & Łoboda, A.M. 2021 Identification of coherent structures downstream of patches of aquatic vegetation in a natural environment. J. Hydrol. 596, 126123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przyborowski, Ł, Nones, M., Mrokowska, M., Książek, L., Phan, C.N., Strużyński, A., Wyrębek, M., Mitka, B. & Wojak, S. 2022 Preliminary evidence on laboratory experiments to detect the impact of transient flow on bedload transport. Acta Geophys. 70 (5), 23112324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pu, J.H. 2021 Velocity profile and turbulence structure measurement corrections for sediment transport-induced water-worked bed. Fluids 6 (2), 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinoshika, H., Rinoshika, A., Wang, J.J. & Zheng, Y. 2021 3D flow structures behind a wall-mounted short cylinder. Ocean Engng 221, 108535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeque, M.F., Rajaratnam, N. & Loewen, M.R. 2009 Shallow turbulent wakes behind bed-mounted cylinders in open channels. J. Hydraul Res. 47 (6), 727743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salim, S., Pattiaratchi, C., Tinoco, R., Coco, G., Hetzel, Y., Wijeratne, S. & Jayaratne, R. 2017 The influence of turbulent bursting on sediment resuspension under unidirectional currents. Earth Surf. Dyn. 5, 399415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SonTek 2001 Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) field technical manual. SonTek Technical Documentation, September 2001.Google Scholar
Sumer, B.M. & Fredsøe, J. 2002 The Mechanics of Scour in the Marine Environment. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahidati, V.J., Ahmadi, A., Abedini, A., & Heidarpour, M. 2023 Evaluation of the simultaneous combination of bed sill and sacrificial piles in the reduction of local scour depth around the bridge pier and three-dimensional analysis of turbulent flow structure around them. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2416854/v1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayasree, B.A., Eldho, T.I., Mazumder, B.S. & Ahmad, N. 2019 Influence of bridge pier shape on flow field and scour geometry. Intl J. River Basin Manag. 17 (1), 109129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallwork, J.T., Pu, J.H., Kundu, S., Hanmaiahgari, P.R., Pandey, M., Satyanaga, A., Amir Khan, M. & Wood, A. 2022 Review of suspended sediment transport mathematical modelling studies. Fluids 7 (1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P., Balachandar, R. & Bolisetti, T. 2019 Examination of blockage effects on the progression of local scour around a circular cylinder. Water 11, 2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P., Balachandar, R., Roussinova, V. & Barron, R. 2022 Particle image velocimetry evaluation of flow-altering countermeasures for local scour around a submerged circular cylinder. Intl J. Sedim. Res. 37 (4), 411423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yücesan, S., Wildt, D., Gmeiner, P., Schobesberger, J., Hauer, C., Sindelar, C., Habersack, H. & Tritthart, M. 2021 Interaction of very large scale motion of coherent structures with sediment particle exposure. Water 13 (3), 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar