Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for post-stroke adjustment difficulties via telerehabilitation in a working-age man – CORRIGENDUM

In this article the author regrets that a box on ‘Unworkable Action vs Committed Action’ is missing on Page 6, Figure 1.

The old Figure 1 and caption are reproduced below:-

Figure 1. Formulation of John’s difficulties at assessment based on the Hexaflex (Hayes et al., 2006).

The new Figure 1 and caption are reproduced below:-

Figure 1. Formulation of John’s Difficulties at Assessment based on the Hexaflex (Hayes et al., 2006).

In this article the author regrets the errors listed below.

Under the ‘Outcome’ heading on Page 11, the first sentence should read To evaluate the outcome of the intervention, the Singlims_ES.exe programme (Crawford et al., 2010) was used to compare John’s scores (CORE-10, CompACT and VQ) with those of control samples.

A reference was missed from the References list on Page 17.

Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Porter, S. (2010). Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.513967