Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T08:49:55.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speaking Truth to Power Structures: Integrity and Identity in Ecclesiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2025

Martyn Percy
Martyn Percy*
Affiliation:
Prof. Religion and Culture, University of St. Joseph, Macao, China Institut für Christkatholische Theologie, Bern, Switzerland
*
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Speaking truth ought to be normative in churches, and yet when it does, the foundations and structures of power are often shaken to the core. This paper explores the issues of identity and integrity in ecclesiology and is concerned with the ethical paradigms and moral frameworks that need to be in place if churches are to be places where honesty and truthfulness can be normative. Churches often fail as institutions because they presume they can conduct their affairs as organizations might. Churches become anger-averse, resisting the voices and experiences of victims, in order that the flow of power and its structures are unimpeded. At that point, churches become inherently committed to re-abusing victims and are unable to hear their pain and protests, which only leads to the perpetration of further abuse.

Keywords

AbuseAngerEcclesiologyEmotionIdentityPowerScandal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , November 2024 , pp. 379 - 400
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basset, L., Holy Anger: Jacob, Job, Jesus (London: Continuum, 2007).Google Scholar
Bierstedt, R., ‘The Problem of Authority’, in Berger, M., Abel, T. and Page, C. H. (eds), Freedom and Control in Modern Society (New York: Van Nostrand, 1954).Google Scholar
Foucault, M., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (New York: Pantheon, 1980).Google Scholar
Gibbs, M., An Abuse of Faith (London: Church House Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar
Girard, R., Violence and the Sacred (London: Athlone Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Girard, R., Celui Par Qui Le Scandale Arrive (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 2001).Google Scholar
Greider, K., ‘Too Militant? Aggression, Gender and the Construction of Justice’, in Moessner, J. (ed.), Through the Eyes of Women: Insights for Pastoral Care (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Grün, Anselm, Petit Traité de Spiritualité au Quotidien (Paris: Albin Michel, 1998)Google Scholar
Hahn, C., Growing in Authority, Relinquishing Control: A New Approach to Faithful Leadership (Washington DC: Alban Institute, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, B. & Robb, C., Making the Connections: Essays in Feminist Social Ethics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S., A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic (Notre Dame, Ind: Univ of Notre Dame Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Heifetz, R., Gradshow, A. and Linsky, M., The Practice of Adaptive Leadership (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review, 2009).Google Scholar
Jaques, E., A General Theory of Bureaucracy (London: Heinemann, 1976).Google Scholar
Khan, S., Death in the City: On loss, Mourning and Melancholia at Work (London: Karnac Books, 2017).Google Scholar
Le Guin, U., Dancing at the Edge of the World: Words, Women, Places (New York: Grove Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Lord, A., ‘The Uses of Anger’, Women’s Studies Quarterly 9 (1981), pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
Lukes, S., ‘Power and Authority’, in Bottomore, T. and Nisbet, R. (eds), A History of Sociological Analysis ( New York: Basic Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Manne, A., Crimes of the Cross: the Anglican Paedophile Network of Newcastle, Its Protectors and the Man Who Fought for Justice (Collingwood, VIC: Schwartz Books, Black Inc. Press, 2024).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (London: Duckworth, 1981).Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. A., The Social Bond (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1970).Google Scholar
Mawer, P., Review of the Nomination to the See of Sheffield and Related Concerns: A Report by the Independent Reviewer (London: Church House Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar
Oakley, L. and Kinmond, K., Breaking the Silence on Spiritual Abuse (London: Palgrave, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, S., The Church, Authority, and Foucault: Imagining the Church as an Open Space of Freedom (London: Routledge, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T., Essays in Sociological Theory [1954] (New York: Free Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Percy, M., Power and the Church: Ecclesiology in an Age of Transition (London: Cassell, 1997).Google Scholar
Percy, M., Salt of the Earth: Religious Resilience in a Secular Age (London: Continuum and Sheffield Academic Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Percy, M., Engaging with Contemporary Culture: Christianity Theology and the Concrete Church (Farnham: Ashgate, 2005).Google Scholar
Percy, M., Psalms of Solace (London: Bloomsbury, 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, M., The Exiled Church (London: SCM-Canterbury press, 2025).Google Scholar
Strong, R., The Oxford History of Anglicanism, Volume III: Partisan Anglicanism and its Global Expansion 1829-c. 1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter Rehmann, L., Rage in the Belly: Hunger in the New Testament (Eugene, OR; Cascade Books, 2021).Google Scholar
Thung, M., The Precarious Organisation: Sociological Explorations of the Church’s Mission and Structure (The Hague: Mouton & Co., 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar