Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T11:19:21.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anti-Trans Attacks: Interrogating “Gender” in Politics and Gender Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2024

Zein Murib*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Fordham University, New York, NY USA

Extract

This essay considers the rapid uptick in anti-trans legislation that targets transgender girls and women as an occasion to critically interrogate the ways that gender is conceptualized and operationalized in political science (Murib 2022). I argue that the disciplinary tendency to view gender as a single-axis facet of identity that is static and rooted in biology needs to be reconsidered in light of two problems. First, collapsing biological sex and gender naturalizes the gender of non-trans women and men as static, normal, and self-evident; transgender people, in contrast, are locked into perpetual processes of gendering themselves against this biological baseline (Enke 2012). Second, and as a result of this limited view of gender, political scientists face difficulties anticipating, understanding, and addressing recent mobilizations invested in maintaining White, heterosexual, and reproductive families as the cornerstone of what it means to be a proper citizen (Alexander 1994).

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexander, M. Jacki. 1994. “Not Just (Any) Body Can Be a Citizen: The Politics of Law, Sexuality and Postcoloniality in Trinidad and Tobago and the Bahamas.” Feminist Review (48): 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, Amanda, and Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth. 2017. “Sex Isn’t Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 39 (4): 1019–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, Seah, Singal, Robbie, Grasso, Chris, King, Dana, Mayer, Kenneth, Baker, Kellan, and Makadon, Harvey. 2014. “Do Ask, Do Tell: High Levels of Acceptability by Patients of Routine Collection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Four Diverse American Community Health Centers.” PLOS ONE September. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Cathy J. 1997. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 3 (4): 437–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conron, Kerith, Landers, Stewart J, Reisner, Sari, and Sell, Randall L. 2014. “Sex and Gender in the US Health Surveillance System: A Call to Action.” American Journal of Public Health 104 (6): 970–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–67.Google Scholar
Currah, Paisley. 2022. Sex Is as Sex Does: Governing Transgender Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Enke, A. Finn. 2012. “The Education of Little Cis.” Transfeminist Perspectives In and Beyond Transgender or Gender Studies, 6077.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. Revised ed. edition. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Stolle, Dietlind. 2021. “Beyond the Gender Gap: The Role of Gender Identity.” The Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1818–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., Rose McDermott, J.Michael Bailey, and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2012. “The Different Effects of Gender and Sex on Vote Choice.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 7692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J. 1990. “The Medical Construction of Gender: Case Management of Intersexed Infants.” Signs 16 (1): 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labuski, C., and Keo-Meier, C.. 2015. “The (Mis)Measure of Trans.” TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 2 (1): 1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Brittany R. 2022. “At the Borders of the Body Politic: Fetal Citizens, Pregnant Migrants, and Reproductive Injustices in Immigration Detention.” American Political Science Review 116 (1): 116–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika. 2016. Masculinity, Femininity, and American Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L., and Jones, David R.. 2022. “Gender, Sex, and Trust in Government.” Politics & Gender 18 (2): 297320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2011. “Distinguishing Sex and Gender.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (1): 8992.Google Scholar
Murib, Zein. 2022. “Don’t Read the Comments: Examining Social Media Discourse on Trans Athletes.” Laws 11 (4): 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murib, Zein. 2023. Terms of Exclusion: Rightful Citizenship Claims and the Construction of LGBT Political Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rippon, Gina. 2019. Gender and Our Brains: How New Neuroscience Explodes the Myths of the Male and Female Minds. First American edition. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Simien, Evelyn and Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2011. “Mini Symposium: Intersectionality Research.” Politics Research Quarterly 64 (1): 185–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spade, Dean. 2011. Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics and the Limits of Law. South End Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Charlotte Chuck, Ledbetter, Jay N., and Youssef, Cris P.. 2013. “A Two-Question Method for Assessing Gender Categories in the Social and Medical Sciences.” Journal of Sex Research 50 (8): 767–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westbrook, Laurel, and Saperstein, Aliya. 2015. “New Categories Are Not Enough: Rethinking the Measurement of Sex and Gender in Social Surveys.” Gender & Society 29 (4): 534–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuest, Joanna. 2023. Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar