Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T01:28:21.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Depoliticizing DEI: Path to fulfillment of its core values and effective implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2024

Hwayeon Myeong
Hwayeon Myeong*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2024 , pp. 511 - 515
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. D., Jacoby-Senghor, D. S., & Raymundo, I. (2022). If you rise, I fall: Equality is prevented by the misperception that it harms advantaged groups. Science Advances, 8(18), eabm2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A., Purnsley, B., Washington, F., & Bell, R. L. (2023). Is the leadership for diversity, equity, and inclusion here to stay. Journal of Organizational Culture Communications and Conflict, 27, 1–9.Google Scholar
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2015). From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1665–1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2019). Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12), e12501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J., Siu, A., Diamond, L., & Bradburn, N. (2021). Is deliberation an antidote to extreme partisan polarization? Reflections on America in one room. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1464–1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follmer, K., Sabat, I., Jones, K., & King, E. (2024). Under attack: Why and how I-O psychologists should counteract threats to DEI in education and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 17.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. (2020, June 8). Tim Scott introduces George Floyd, Walter Scott Notification Act requiring states to report police shootings. The Washington Times. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/8/tim-scott-introduces-george-floyd-walter-scott-not/ Google Scholar
Iyer, A. (2022). Understanding advantaged groups’ opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies: The role of perceived threat. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(5), e12666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. FSG.Google Scholar
Lowery, B. S., Unzueta, M. M., Knowles, E. D., & Goff, P. A. (2006). Concern for the in-group and opposition to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 961–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehdad, A., & Khoshnami, A. (2016). Predicting employees organizational loyalty through perceived organizational justice components. International Journal of Psychology, 10(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Milner, S. (2019). Gender pay gap reporting regulations: Advancing gender equality policy in tough economic times. British Politics, 14(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novoa, G., Echelbarger, M., Gelman, A., & Gelman, S. A. (2023). Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 120(47), e2309361120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 118(26), e2024292118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Settle, J. E., & Carlson, T. N. (2019). Opting out of political discussions. Political Communication, 36(3), 476–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., Garcia, D. M., Gee, S. S., & Orazietti, K. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, C. C., Walton, G. M., Reinhart, E. C., & Markus, H. R. (2023). Mitigating welfare-related prejudice and partisanship among US conservatives with moral reframing of a universal basic income policy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 105, 104424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojcieszak, M., & Warner, B. R. (2020). Can interparty contact reduce affective polarization? A systematic test of different forms of intergroup contact. Political Communication, 37(6), 789–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar