Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:34:45.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stabilization of overweight prevalence and improvement of dietary habits in French children between 2004 and 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2014

Caroline Carriere
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, 146 rue Léo Saignat, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Coralie Langevin
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, 146 rue Léo Saignat, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Eduoard Kossi Déti
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France
Pascale Barberger-Gateau
Affiliation:
INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, 146 rue Léo Saignat, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Sylvie Maurice
Affiliation:
INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, 146 rue Léo Saignat, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Hélène Thibault*
Affiliation:
Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, 146 rue Léo Saignat, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
*
* Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the present study was to describe changes in overweight and obesity prevalence and eating habits among 7·5–10·5-year-old children in Aquitaine (France) between 2004 and 2008, and to assess how the programme ‘Nutrition, Prevention and Health of children and teenagers in Aquitaine’ implemented in 2004 may have impacted these changes.

Design

Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in two samples of children: the ‘before programme’ sample during the school year 2004/2005 and the ‘after programme’ sample during the school year 2008/2009.

Settings

Data were collected on gender, age, weight, height, area of residence (rural/urban) and socio-economic status of the school (non-low socio-economic/low socio-economic). Multivariate analyses were used to assess the effect of the regional programme intervention on the evolution of overweight and obesity prevalence and eating habits independently.

Subjects

The ‘before programme’ sample included 1836 children from 163 schools during the school year 2004/2005 and the ‘after programme’ sample included 3483 children from 210 schools during the school year 2008/2009.

Results

After adjustment of the model for age, residential area and socio-economic status of the area of residence, the prevalence of overweight including obesity (OR=1·05; 95 % CI 0·89, 1·23, P=0·56) and of obesity (OR=0·99; 95 % CI 0·71, 1·39, P=0·96) was found to have stabilized and eating habits had improved: intake of light afternoon meals had increased (OR=1·38; 95 % CI 1·13, 1·69, P=0·002) while snacking in the morning (OR=0·50; 95 % CI 0·45, 0·57, P<0·001) and nibbling (OR=0·81; 95 % CI 0·70, 0·93, P<0·001) had decreased.

Conclusions

These results encourage the promotion and implementation of regional and national interventions among children regarding their eating habits in order to stabilize or decrease the prevalence of overweight.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Obesity has been recognized as a major public health epidemic by the WHO since 1998( 1 ) and is a well-established risk factor for several chronic diseases( Reference Dudina, Cooney and Backer 2 Reference L’Allemand-Jander 4 ). Over the past few years, the prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased dramatically among children and adolescents both in developed countries and other parts of the world( Reference Jolliffe 5 Reference Wang and Lobstein 7 ). Several local and national studies in France have shown that overweight prevalence among children aged 5–17 years increased from 3 % in 1965 to 5 % in 1980, 12 % in 1996 and 16 % in 2000( Reference Girardet, Bocquet and Bresson 8 , 9 ). Since the 2000s, a study carried out on representative samples of French children has shown that overweight prevalence on a national scale seems to have stabilized at about 16 %( 10 Reference Salavane, Peneau and Rolland-Cachera 12 ). Obesity is known to be a multifactorial problem resulting from a reduction in physical activity( Reference Riddoch, Bo Andersen and Wedderkoop 13 , Reference Hills, Andersen and Byrne 14 ) and changes in dietary habits( Reference Maffeis 15 Reference Diethelm, Jankovic and Moreno 17 ). Several studies have shown that the principal risk factors for childhood overweight include parental obesity, low socio-economic status (SES), low physical activity, high level of sedentary activities and inappropriate diet such as the consumption of fatty and sugary foods( Reference Hills, Andersen and Byrne 14 , Reference Juonala, Juhola and Magnussen 18 , Reference Thibault, Carriere and Langevin 19 ). In France, the National Program on Nutrition and Health (PNNS) was launched by the Ministry of Health in 2001( Reference Girardet, Bocquet and Bresson 8 , Reference Hercberg, Chat-Yung and Chauliac 20 ). One of its main objectives is to stop the increase in the prevalence of childhood obesity in France. Various public health actions for improving dietary habits and physical activity in children have been implemented. In accordance with the objectives and tools of the PNNS, a multidisciplinary public health programme called ‘Nutrition, Prevention and Health for children and teenagers in Aquitaine’ (www.nutritionenfantaquitaine.fr) was launched in November 2004 in Aquitaine (south-west France) to improve the diet and physical activity of children and adolescents and to stabilize the prevalence of childhood obesity, by means of three key strategies( Reference Thibault, Boulard and Carriere 21 ):

  1. 1. early detection, prevention and management of childhood obesity by mobilizing stakeholders in Aquitaine;

  2. 2. improvement of the food supply in middle schools and implementing extracurricular activities; and

  3. 3. implementation of educational programmes on food and physical activity aimed at children, their families, and their educational and medical communities.

Before launching the programme, a study was conducted in 2004–2005 among 7·5–10·5-year-old children in order to guide the intervention and to provide baseline data on dietary habits, lifestyle, and overweight and obesity prevalence. Four years later, the study was repeated in order to evaluate the impact of the programme on children’s lifestyle.

The objective of the present study was therefore to describe changes in overweight and obesity prevalence and dietary behaviour among 7·5–10·5-year-old children in Aquitaine from 2004 to 2008 and to assess the impact of the programme ‘Nutrition, Prevention and Health of children and teenagers in Aquitaine’ on this evolution.

Methods

Study design and participants

Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2004 and 2008 on representative samples of primary schools randomly selected in Aquitaine. Stratification variables were the district, the size of the school, the area of residence (urban or rural) and the zone category (low socio-economic (LSE) or non-LSE). Schools selected for each study could be different.

The surveys were conducted on children of the same age group:

  1. 1. before implementation of the programme (2004/2005 school year), sample called ‘before programme’ (163 schools); and

  2. 2. after implementation of the programme (2008/2009 school year), sample called ‘after programme’ (210 schools).

All the children in third grade from the selected schools who were seen by the school nurse during the annual health check were included in the samples. Children aged less than 7·5 years or more than 10·5 years old were excluded from the analysis for the sake of homogeneity. Parents were informed of the survey and only children whose parents agreed were included in the study.

Data were collected by means of a questionnaire (see Appendix) completed by the school nurse in the presence of the child during the health check. Data transmitted for the analysis were anonymous.

Data collection and measurements

Weight status

Weight status was determined from weight and height measurements collected by school nurses. Weight and height were measured by school nurses in the morning or the afternoon (fasting was not necessary) using standardized procedures and measurement devices. Weight was measured with the child lightly dressed, without shoes, and with the school health centre scales; height was measured with the child standing up, his/her weight being equally distributed on both feet, with head, back and buttocks on the vertical part of the height gauge. Weight status was determined by BMI, calculated from measured weight and height data transmitted by school nurses as follows: BMI=[weight (kg)]/[height (m)]2. Weight status (normal, overweight or obesity) was attributed with the International Obesity Task Force definition( Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal 22 ) according to the BMI, gender and age of the child.

Eating habits

In both surveys, eating habits of children were assessed by school nurses who collected information on their usual breakfast intake (always, sometimes or never), morning snack intake (yes or no), light afternoon meal intake (yes or no) and nibbling habits (yes or no; in the present study, ‘nibbling’ refers to eating something between the light afternoon meal (food intake recommended for children) and dinner). The composition of each dietary intake was also described.

School socio-economic status

In France, state-run schools are described by the school administration as LSE (low SES) or non-LSE (non-low SES), according to their socio-economic characteristics( 23 , 24 ). LSE schools have a high rate of school failure or are located in specific geographical areas (rural area, suburbs of big cities) where socio-economic difficulties are prevalent (including low SES of families). At the age of 5–10 years, most children go to school in the area where they live and their school address can be used as an indicator of SES of the area of residence.

Other variables

Children’s age and gender were collected for both surveys. According to the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies, the area of residence is classified as urban if continuously built up and accommodating 2000 persons or more. Rural populations are all those not classified as urban.

Statistical analysis

Data registration was performed using EpiData software. Differences between samples were assessed by the χ 2 test or the Kruskal–Wallis test. All statistical tests were two-sided and a P<0·05 was considered statistically significant. Models were fitted using the SAS statistical software package version 9·1·3. Multivariate analyses were used and odds ratios were calculated to assess the effect of the regional programme intervention on the evolution of overweight and obesity prevalence and eating habits independently.

Results

Study population

The response rate of schools was 89·0 % in 2004/2005 and 92·4 % in 2008/2009. The ‘before programme’ sample included 1836 children and the ‘after programme’ sample included 3483 children, for whom both weight status and dietary habits were known.

Characteristics of both samples are described in Table 1. For both samples, the male:female ratio was close to 1 (P=0·67). In the ‘before programme’ sample, the mean age of children and the rates of children who lived in low-SES areas and urban areas were slightly higher than in the ‘after programme’ sample (P<0·05). Thus, results concerning the evolution of weight status and dietary behaviour after 4 years of programme implementation were adjusted for age, area of residence (rural/urban) and SES of the living zone in a multivariate analysis.

Table 1 Characteristics of children from the third grade before (n 1836) and after (n 3483) implementation of the prevention programme. Cross-sectional surveys in primary schools in the Aquitaine region, France

LSE, low socio-economic.

Evolution of eating habits among children before and after the prevention programme

Four years after the prevention programme, eating habits had changed globally (Table 2). The proportion of children who usually took a light afternoon meal had increased significantly (P<0·01) while morning snack intake and nibbling had decreased significantly (P<0·01). Moreover, the number of children who took breakfast had stabilized (P=0·14; Table 2).

Table 2 Eating habits and prevalence of overweight and obesity in third-grade children before (n 1836) and after (n 3483) implementation of the prevention programme. Cross-sectional surveys in primary schools in the Aquitaine region, France

These results persisted after adjustment for age, area of residence and SES of the living zone: the increase in light afternoon meals (OR=1·38; 95 % CI 1·13, 1·69, P=0·002) and the decrease in morning snack intake (OR=0·50; 95 % CI 0·45, 0·57, P<0·001) and nibbling (OR=0·81; 95 % CI 0·70, 0·93, P<0·001) persisted (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of associations found between weight status and eating habits and programme intervention between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009 among third-grade children in the Aquitaine region, France: multivariate logistic regression analysis (n 5319)

Model adjusted for year of intervention, area of residence, zone category and age.

Moreover, the evolution was generally favourable with regard to the composition of breakfast, light afternoon meals and morning snacks. Fewer chocolates, candies and pastries were consumed (from 17·6 % to 12·6 % at morning snack intake and from 17·7 % to 10·3 % for light afternoon meals, P<0·0001), while there was a significant increase in fruit consumption (from 18·7 % to 32·8 % for morning snack intake and from 20·1 % to 26·6 % for light afternoon meals, P<0·0001).

Evolution of overweight and obesity prevalence before and after the programme

The overall prevalence of overweight (including obesity) and obesity stabilized between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009 (P=0·85; Table 1). After adjustment for age, area of residence and SES of the living zone, the stabilization of overweight including obesity (OR=1·05; 95 % CI 0·89, 1·23, P=0·56) and obesity (OR=0·99; 95 % CI 0·71, 1·39, P=0·96) persisted (Table 3).

Discussion

The present study shows that overweight (including obesity) and obesity prevalence of children aged 7·5–10·5 years stabilized in Aquitaine (south-west France) between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009. This stabilization, which was the main objective of both the regional and national programmes for nutrition and health( Reference Hercberg, Chat-Yung and Chauliac 20 , Reference Thibault, Carriere and Baine 25 ), is consistent with recent studies conducted at national level in France among 7–9-year-old children( Reference Salavane, Peneau and Rolland-Cachera 12 ), in other European countries( Reference Jeannot, Mahler and Duperrex 26 Reference Olds, Maher and Zumin 29 ) and in the USA, China and Australia( Reference Olds, Maher and Zumin 29 ).

Moreover, qualitative and quantitative improvements in children’s dietary habits were also observed between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009. First, the proportion of children having a light afternoon meal (usually after class, around 16.00 hours) increased between the two periods studied. Because of the duration of the school day in France, this light afternoon meal is recommended for children. The protective effect of the afternoon meal has been described previously and may be explained by a better distribution of energy intake, thus avoiding nibbling between lunch and dinner( Reference Bellisle, Rolland-Cachera and Deheeger 30 ). On the other hand, the proportion of children having a morning snack or nibbling decreased. Many studies report that the foods eaten in morning snacks and nibbling are often fatty and sweet and have a negative impact on food balance( Reference Bellisle, Rolland-Cachera and Deheeger 30 , Reference Bocquet, Bresson and Breind 31 ). Finally, a slight but non-significant increase was observed in breakfast intake. This could be due to the fact that the percentage of children having breakfast every day in 2004/2005 was already high (96·3 %).

These changes in dietary habits among Aquitaine children are consistent with nationwide nutritional recommendations made by the PNNS and relayed regionally by the programme ‘Nutrition, Prevention and Health for children and teenagers in Aquitaine’, especially though the dissemination of flyers concerning the importance of taking breakfast and an afternoon meal and cutting out morning snacks( Reference Thibault, Carriere and Baine 25 , Reference Thibault, Carriere and Langevin 32 ).

Actions undertaken on the basis of the PNNS( Reference Girardet, Bocquet and Bresson 33 ) and the nutrition programme in Aquitaine( Reference Thibault, Carriere and Baine 25 ) could be responsible for the stabilization of overweight and the improvement in dietary behaviour among 7·5–10·5-year-old children in Aquitaine. Besides promoting healthy dietary habits, other actions undertaken in Aquitaine, such as early detection of overweight and encouraging a physically active lifestyle, could also have played a part( Reference Thibault, Carriere and Langevin 32 ). However, since there was no control group, we cannot even partly attribute the stabilization of overweight and obesity prevalences from 2004/2005 to 2008/2009 and improvement in dietary behaviour to the Aquitaine prevention programme. Moreover, the studies were performed on the same age group but not on the same children: in 2008/2009, some children in third grade had already benefited from health education campaigns in their first year in school, so they were more likely to have better dietary habits than those included in the first study. However, in most studies describing recent stabilization of overweight and obesity prevalence, the trend was associated with national, regional and/or local actions that had been implemented in many sectors of society( Reference Girardet, Bocquet and Bresson 33 , Reference Sjoberg, Moraeus and Yngve 34 ).

Another limitation of the present study is the fact that lifestyle habits were not assessed, especially physical activity and sleep, which are recognized as factors for obesity in children( Reference Lioret, Touvier and Lafay 35 , Reference Spiegel 36 ). Data on physical activity and sedentary lifestyle were collected but only in the second study in 2008/2009. Consequently, any changes in the physical activity of children could not be assessed between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009.

No sleep data were collected because children’s assessment of their quality or duration of sleep is not necessarily reliable and in order to limit the time taken by school nurses to administer the survey.

On the other hand, one of the strengths of our study is the large representative samples studied in both analyses. Indeed, by conducting this survey at school, we were able to collect anthropometric data on a large number of children of the same age but with different lifestyles and SES. Another study strength is that data were collected by school health professionals, thereby ensuring high-quality data compared with self-reported data or multicentre measurements.

In addition, the multivariate analysis was adjusted for characteristics known to have an influence on overweight prevalence: age (increase in overweight prevalence with age)( 10 ), area of residence (higher prevalence of overweight among rural children)( Reference Sjoberg, Moraeus and Yngve 34 , Reference Bruner, Lawson and Pickett 37 , Reference Liu, Bennett and Harun 38 ) and especially SES of the living zone. Indeed, previous studies have shown that the stabilization of overweight prevalence seems to differ according to SES of the population, with a more significant slowing down of the increase in prevalence in non-low SES areas( Reference Peneau, Salavane and Maillard-Teyssier 39 ).

These findings reinforce the relevance of implementing public health programmes such as the PNNS and the Aquitaine programme. Furthermore, they underline the importance of implementing and pursuing interventions in primary schools in order to achieve consistent behavioural changes, as recommended by recent international( 1 , 16 ), national( Reference Hercberg, Chat-Yung and Chauliac 20 , Reference Girardet, Bocquet and Bresson 33 ) and regional policies. New data are now needed to continue to assess the evolution of overweight and obesity prevalence and dietary behaviour among children in the Aquitaine region.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors thank the school nurses and doctors who collected and recorded measurements during child health surveillance, and all partners from the Local Education Authority of the Aquitaine region involved in the programme ‘Nutrition, Prevention and Health of children and teenagers in Aquitaine’. Financial support: This study was funded by the national health insurance scheme and the Regional Health Agency of Aquitaine as part of funding allocated to the Aquitaine programme for nutrition, prevention and health. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: H.T. was responsible for the conception, design, interpretation of the data, and writing and revising the manuscript. C.C. contributed to the design and interpretation of data and performed the analysis, writing and revising of the manuscript. C.L. contributed to writing and revising the manuscript. E.K.D. contributed to the analysis. P.B.-G. contributed to the interpretation and revised the manuscript. S.M. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: All data were anonymous: children’s identity was not transmitted. Parents were informed of the study.

Appendix

Questionnaire used for the study (translated from French)

References

1. World Health Organization (2006) Addressing the Socioeconomic Determinants of Healthy Eating Habits and Physical Activity Levels among Adolescents. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
2. Dudina, A, Cooney, M, Backer, D et al. (2011) Relationships between body mass index, cardiovascular mortality, and risk factors: a report from the SCORE investigators. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 18, 731742.Google Scholar
3. Wang, L, Denniston, M, Lee, S et al. (2010) Long-term health and economic impact of preventing and reducing overweight and obesity in adolescence. J Adolesc Health 46, 467473.Google Scholar
4. L’Allemand-Jander, D (2010) Clinical diagnosis of metabolic and cardiovascular risks in overweight children: early development of chronic diseases in the obese child. Int J Obes (Lond) 34, Suppl. 2, S32S36.Google Scholar
5. Jolliffe, D (2004) Extent of overweight among US children and adolescents from 1971 to 2000. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 49.Google Scholar
6. Lobstein, T & Frelut, ML (2003) Prevalence of overweight among children in Europe. Obes Rev 4, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Wang, Y & Lobstein, T (2006) Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes 1, 1125.Google Scholar
8. Girardet, JP, Bocquet, A, Bresson, JL et al. (2009) French national program for nutrition and health: effects on children’s health. Arch Pediatr 16, 36.Google Scholar
9. Haute Autorité de Santé (2011) Surpoids et obésité de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Recommandations de bonne pratique clinique. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS.Google Scholar
10. INSERM (2000) Obésité: dépistage et prévention chez l’enfant. Paris: INSERM.Google Scholar
11. Rolland-Cachera, MF, Castetbon, K, Arnault, N et al. (2002) Body mass index in 7–9-y-old French children: frequency of obesity, overweight and thinness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 26, 16101616.Google Scholar
12. Salavane, B, Peneau, S, Rolland-Cachera, MF et al. (2009) Stabilization of overweight prevalence in French children between 2000 and 2007. Int J Pediatr Obes 4, 6672.Google Scholar
13. Riddoch, CJ, Bo Andersen, L, Wedderkoop, N et al. (2004) Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36, 8692.Google Scholar
14. Hills, AP, Andersen, LB & Byrne, NM (2011) Physical activity and obesity in children. Br J Sports Med 45, 866870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Maffeis, C (2000) Aetiology of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 159, Suppl. 1, S35S44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
17. Diethelm, K, Jankovic, N, Moreno, LA et al. (2012) Food intake of European adolescents in the light of different food-based dietary guidelines: results of the HELENA (Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence) Study. Public Health Nutr 15, 386398.Google Scholar
18. Juonala, M, Juhola, J, Magnussen, CG et al. (2011) Childhood environmental and genetic predictors of adulthood obesity: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96, E1542E1549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Thibault, H, Carriere, C, Langevin, C et al. (2012) Prevalence and factors associated with overweight and obesity in French primary school children. Public Health Nutr 16, 193201.Google Scholar
20. Hercberg, S, Chat-Yung, S & Chauliac, M (2008) The French National Nutrition and Health Program: 2001–2006–2010. Int J Public Health 53, 6877.Google Scholar
21. Thibault, H, Boulard, S, Carriere, C et al. (2010) Prevention and treatment of childhood obesity in the Aquitaine region (France). Int J Pediatr Obes 5, Suppl. 1, 84.Google Scholar
22. Cole, TJ, Bellizzi, MC, Flegal, KM et al. (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320, 12401243.Google Scholar
23. Ministère de l’Education Nationale (1981) Enseignements Elémentaire et Secondaire: Zones Prioritaires. Bulletin Officiel 27, 20772079.Google Scholar
24. Ministère de l’Education Nationale (1981) Zones prioritaires et programmes d’éducation prioritaires. Bulletin Officiel spécial N°1, 610.Google Scholar
25. Thibault, H, Carriere, C, Baine, M et al. (2009) Prévention de l’obésité de l’enfant: l’expérience de l’Aquitaine. Arch Pediatr 16, 570572.Google Scholar
26. Jeannot, E, Mahler, P, Duperrex, O et al. (2010) Evolution of overweight and obesity among 5–6-year-old schoolchildren in Geneva. Swiss Med Wkly 140, w13040.Google Scholar
27. Bluher, S, Meigen, C, Gausche, R et al. (2011) Age-specific stabilization in obesity prevalence in German children: a cross-sectional study from 1999 to 2008. Int J Pediatr Obes 6, e199e206.Google Scholar
28. Tambalisk, D, Panagiotakos, DB, Kavouras, SA et al. (2010) Eleven-year prevalence trends of obesity in Greek children: first evidence that prevalence of obesity is leveling off. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18, 161166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Olds, T, Maher, C, Zumin, S et al. (2011) Evidence that the prevalence of childhood overweight is plateauing: data from nine countries. Int J Pediatr Obes 6, 342360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Bellisle, F, Rolland-Cachera, MF, Deheeger, M et al. (1988) Obesity and food intake in children: evidence for a role of metabolic and/or behavioral daily rhythms. Appetite 11, 111118.Google Scholar
31. Bocquet, A, Bresson, JL, Breind, A et al. (2003) The morning snack at school is inadequate and unnecessary. Arch Pediatr 10, 945947.Google Scholar
32. Thibault, H, Carriere, C, Langevin, C et al. (2010) La collation à l’école maternelle: évolution des perceptions et pratiques des enseignants d’Aquitaine entre 2004 et 2008. Arch Pediatr 17, 15161521.Google Scholar
33. Girardet, JP, Bocquet, A, Bresson, JL et al. (2009) Le programme national nutrition santé (PNNS): quels effets sur la santé des enfants? Arch Pediatr 16, 36.Google Scholar
34. Sjoberg, A, Moraeus, L, Yngve, A et al. (2011) Overweight and obesity in a representative sample of schoolchildren – exploring the urban–rural gradient in Sweden. Obes Rev 12, 305314.Google Scholar
35. Lioret, S, Touvier, M, Lafay, L et al. (2008) Dietary and physical activity patterns in French children are related to overweight and socioeconomic status. J Nutr 138, 101107.Google Scholar
36. Spiegel, K (2008) Sleep loss as a risk factor for obesity and diabetes. Int J Pediatr Obes 1, 3 Suppl. 2, 2728.Google Scholar
37. Bruner, MW, Lawson, J, Pickett, W et al. (2008) Rural Canadian adolescents are more likely to be obese compared with urban adolescents. Int J Pediatr Obes 3, 205211.Google Scholar
38. Liu, J, Bennett, KJ, Harun, N et al. (2008) Urban–rural differences in overweight status and physical inactivity among US children aged 10–17 years. J Rural Health 24, 407415.Google Scholar
39. Peneau, S, Salavane, B, Maillard-Teyssier, L et al. (2009) Prevalence of overweight in 6- to 15-year-old children in central/western France from 1996 to 2006: trends toward stabilization. Int J Obes (Lond) 33, 401407.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of children from the third grade before (n 1836) and after (n 3483) implementation of the prevention programme. Cross-sectional surveys in primary schools in the Aquitaine region, France

Figure 1

Table 2 Eating habits and prevalence of overweight and obesity in third-grade children before (n 1836) and after (n 3483) implementation of the prevention programme. Cross-sectional surveys in primary schools in the Aquitaine region, France

Figure 2

Table 3 Summary of associations found between weight status and eating habits and programme intervention between 2004/2005 and 2008/2009 among third-grade children in the Aquitaine region, France: multivariate logistic regression analysis (n 5319)