Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:11:50.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prebiotics in infancy and childhood; clinical research warranted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2011

Christina E. West*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Pediatrics, Umeå University, SE 901 87Umeå, Sweden email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Invited Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2011

The increase in immune-mediated disorders has been strongly linked to reduced early microbial exposure. Vital for the development of immune function, the gut microbiota represent by far the greatest microbial exposure. There is an enormous shift from the ‘sterile’ milieu present in utero to reach full intestinal colonisation with microbes which ultimately outnumber host human cells by more than 10:1. These micro-organisms form an integral part of the intestinal mucosal defence system(Reference Conroy, Shi and Walker1). Emerging evidence suggests that deviant development of the intestinal microbiota and mucosal defence system are key players not only in intestinal but also in non-intestinal immune disorders such as allergic and autoimmune disease(Reference Conroy, Shi and Walker1). Due to immature intestinal immune function, the newborn infant is susceptible to intestinal and systemic infections. Several studies have shown that exclusively breastfed infants, particularly in developing countries as also in developed countries, are less prone to develop infections as compared to formula-fed infants(Reference Labbok, Clark and Goldman2). Human milk is abundant in protective factors, including a large variety of complex non-digestible oligosaccharides(Reference Bode3). Some of these serve as decoy receptors preventing attachment of potential pathogens to the intestinal lining; and being non-digestible, they pass through the small intestine to enter the colon where they promote colonisation by a ‘healthy’ gut microbiota, particularly bifidobacteria. A second more direct immune effect appears to be mediated by the production of fermentation products. Oligosaccharides are fermented by colonising bacteria to produce SCFA, which have direct nutritive and anti-inflammatory effects(Reference Maslowski, Vieira and Ng4). SCFA can also promote intestinal integrity through effects on epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Collectively, and bearing in mind that the amount of oligosaccharides in bovine milk and in infant formulas is much lower and the structures considerably less diversified, these findings provided a strong foundation to explore the effects of oligosaccharide supplementation in infancy in the treatment and prevention of infectious and immune-mediated diseases. Commercially available prebiotics added to some infant formulas are usually in the form of oligosaccharides (although of much less complexity than in human milk). The European Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition recently published a systematic review and comment on the supplementation of infant formula with probiotics and prebiotics(Reference Braegger, Chmielewska and Decsi5). They concluded that with available data, prebiotic-supplemented formulae do not raise safety concerns with regard to growth restriction or other adverse effects in healthy infants. However, the committee stated that there is not enough evidence to recommend the routine use of prebiotic-supplemented formulae, and identified the need for well-designed, randomised, controlled trials in this area.

There are now several published clinical trials in infancy that have demonstrated the effects of prebiotics on gut microbial composition(Reference Braegger, Chmielewska and Decsi5). Even though some positive effects of prebiotics on gut microbial composition(Reference Braegger, Chmielewska and Decsi5) and immune function (reviewed in Lomax & Calder(Reference Lomax and Calder6)) have been demonstrated in clinical trials, there are only a limited number of studies that have actually studied if these effects translate into clinically relevant benefits. Clinical trials targeting a paediatric population have thus far focused on the prevention or treatment of infections and allergic disease. The effects of prebiotics in the prevention of infections have been investigated in a few studies(Reference Braegger, Chmielewska and Decsi5). Bruzzese et al. (Reference Bruzzese, Volpicelli and Squeglia7) reported a lower incidence of gastroenteritis and fewer antibiotic courses in a group of infants receiving formula supplemented with galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides, compared with a group receiving a placebo formula. However, the design of that study was open and not double-blinded, which might unavoidably have introduced some biases to the results. In another study targeting a population at risk of allergic disease, galacto-oligosaccharides/fructo-oligosaccharides-supplemented infants had long-term preventative effects on infections and antibiotic prescriptions, when compared with placebo(Reference Arslanoglu, Moro and Schmitt8). In this issue, van Stuijvenberg et al. (Reference van Stuijvenberg, Eisses and Grüber9) report the results from the Multicentre Infection Prevention Study, a multi-centre, randomised, controlled trial assessing the effects of prebiotic-supplemented formula on fever episodes in healthy infants. A total of 414 infants were randomised to a non-hydrolysed cows' milk protein-based infant formula supplemented with short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides and long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (total amount of oligosaccharides 8 g/l) and 416 infants were randomised to the same formula without addition of oligosaccharides (control group). A group of 300 breastfed infants was included as a non-randomised reference group. Of 830 randomised infants, 361 and 374 in the prebiotic and control groups, respectively, completed the first year. As discussed by the authors, the reported overall incidence of fever episodes was low in all the groups. Somewhat surprisingly, the incidence of fever episodes was slightly higher in the breastfed group. There was no difference in fever episodes or reported associated infectious symptoms or antibiotic treatment between the prebiotic and control groups. This is in contrast to previous studies that reported preventative effects on infections and antibiotic treatment(Reference Bruzzese, Volpicelli and Squeglia7, Reference Arslanoglu, Moro and Schmitt8) by prebiotics. However, the study populations are not necessarily comparable as the study reported in this issue targeted infants at low risk of allergic disease, whereas one of the previous studies targeted a high-risk population(Reference Arslanoglu, Moro and Schmitt8). Also, the effects of prebiotics are likely to be influenced by a range of host and environmental factors which might explain the inconsistency in results. Still, other factors need to be considered. In the study by van Stuijvenberg et al. (Reference van Stuijvenberg, Eisses and Grüber9), mothers in the formula groups could continue breastfeeding following randomisation for ethical reasons. Since 20–30 % of the mothers in the control group still breastfed their infants, the oligosaccharides present in breast milk might have acted as natural prebiotics, possibly affecting the outcome. Another open issue is optimal dosing and intake duration of prebiotics. As underlined in the position paper by the European Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee of Nutrition(Reference Braegger, Chmielewska and Decsi5), this still needs to be defined.

Earlier epidemiological studies suggested a protective link between dietary fibre and allergic conditions(Reference Hijazi, Abalkhail and Seaton10) and there is preliminary evidence of protective effects on early allergic manifestations by neonatal supplementation with oligosaccharides in infants at high risk of allergic disease(Reference van Stuijvenberg, Eisses and Grüber9). Notably, the Multicentre Infection Prevention Study group recently reported a reduction in the incidence of eczema in this study population with a low risk of allergic disease(Reference Grüber, van Stuijvenberg and Mosca11). These findings provide a strong basis to further explore the effects of prebiotics in allergic inflammatory conditions, both in high- and low-risk populations(Reference West, Prescott and Basow12).

In summary, oligosaccharides are the third largest fraction in human milk and confer many potential benefits in breastfed infants. Many of these are dependent on specific structures, some of which are genetically determined. Current commercially available prebiotics are much less complex and it is unlikely that they will provide the recipient infant with all the health benefits as provided by those in human milk. However, they seem to have the potential to promote gut colonisation with bifidobacteria; and some studies have also demonstrated immune-stimulating effects. Preliminary data suggest a role for commercially available prebiotics in the prevention of infections and allergic disease, but confirmatory clinical trials are needed before any recommendations can be given. With further development of oligosaccharides with greater similarity to those in human milk, more significant clinical outcomes can be anticipated. Future clinical trials are needed to provide a clearer message of the possible clinical benefits and limitations of current and future prebiotics.

Acknowledgements

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1 Conroy, ME, Shi, HN & Walker, WA (2009) The long-term health effects of neonatal microbial flora. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 9, 197201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Labbok, MH, Clark, D & Goldman, AS (2004) Breastfeeding: maintaining an irreplaceable immunological resource. Nat Rev Immunol 4, 565572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Bode, L (2009) Human milk oligosaccharides: prebiotics and beyond. Nutr Rev 67, Suppl., S183S191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Maslowski, KM, Vieira, AT, Ng, A, et al. (2009) Regulation of inflammatory responses by gut microbiota and chemoattractant receptor GPR43. Nature 461, 12821286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Braegger, C, Chmielewska, A, Decsi, T, et al. (2011) Supplementation of infant formula with probiotics and/or prebiotics: a systematic review and comment by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 52, 238250.Google ScholarPubMed
6 Lomax, AR & Calder, PC (2009) Prebiotics, immune function, infection and inflammation: a review of the evidence. Br J Nutr 101, 633658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Bruzzese, E, Volpicelli, M, Squeglia, V, et al. (2009) A formula containing galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides prevents intestinal and extra-intestinal infections: an observational study. Clin Nutr 28, 156161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Arslanoglu, S, Moro, GE, Schmitt, J, et al. (2008) Early dietary intervention with a mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides reduces the incidence of allergic manifestations and infections during the first two years of life. J Nutr 138, 10911095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 van Stuijvenberg, M, Eisses, AM, Grüber, C, et al. (2011) Do prebiotics reduce the number of fever episodes in healthy children in their first year of life: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 106, 17401748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Hijazi, N, Abalkhail, B & Seaton, A (2000) Diet and childhood asthma in a society in transition: a study in urban and rural Saudi Arabia. Thorax 55, 775779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Grüber, C, van Stuijvenberg, M, Mosca, F, et al. (2010) Reduced occurrence of early atopic dermatitis because of immunoactive prebiotics among low-atopy-risk infants. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126, 791797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 West, CE & Prescott, SL (2011) Prebiotics and probiotics for prevention of allergic disease. In UpToDate [Basow, DS, editor]. Waltham, MA: UpToDate.Google Scholar