Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:24:36.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trends and determinants of minimum dietary diversity among children aged 6–23 months: a pooled analysis of Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys from 2007 to 2017

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2021

Bunga A Paramashanti*
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW2006, Australia Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Alma Ata, Yogyakarta55183, Indonesia
Tanvir M Huda
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Ashraful Alam
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
Michael J Dibley
Affiliation:
Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW2006, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected], [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To examine minimum dietary diversity (MDD) trends and determinants among children aged 6–23 months.

Design:

Secondary analysis of the Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys (IDHS) between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was MDD, the consumption of at least five out of eight food groups (MDD-8). We included a total of 5015 (IDHS 2007), 5050 (IDHS 2007) and 4925 (IDHS 2017) children aged 6 to 23 months to estimate trends of MDD-8 and to identify factors associated with MDD-8. We used multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for the complex sampling design to investigate the association between the study factors and MDD-8.

Setting:

Indonesia.

Participant:

A total of 14 990 children aged 6–23 months.

Results:

Over the 10 years, the percentage of children who consumed a diversified diet was 53·1 % in 2007, 51·7 % in 2012 and 53·7 % in 2017. Multivariate analyses showed that older age children, higher maternal education, maternal weekly access to media, paternal non-agricultural occupation, history of at least four antenatal care visits and wealthier households were associated with the increased odds of MDD-8. Children living in rural areas, Sulawesi and Eastern Indonesia, were less likely to eat a diversified diet.

Conclusions:

The proportion of children meeting MDD-8 has stagnated in the last decade. Child, parental, health care, household and community factors are associated with MDD-8. Therefore, nutrition education programmes and behaviour change communication activities should target mothers and families from socio-economically and geographically disadvantaged populations.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society.

Child undernutrition remains a public health nutrition issue globally and in Indonesia. Approximately 144 million or 21·3 % of children under 5 years of age worldwide experienced stunting in 2019, while wasting continued to affect an estimated 47 million (6·9 %) children(1). In Indonesia, the most recent survey conducted by the Ministry of Health reported the prevalence of stunting was 30·8 % in 2018(2), which was ‘very high’(Reference de Onis, Borghi and Arimond3). This prevalence has decreased slightly from the previous static level of around 37·0 % between 2007 and 2013(4). The WHO global target is to reduce stunting by 40·0 % in 2025, or a 3·9 % relative reduction per year since 2012(5), but the national rate of decline in Indonesia of approximately 1·3 % per year between 2013(4) and 2018(2) will not be sufficient to reach stunting reduction goal. In addition, the small drop in wasting, from 12·1 % in 2013(4) to 10·2 % in 2018(2), was far from the global wasting reduction target of less than 5·0 % in 2025(5).

A diversified diet may help children fulfil their nutrient demands for optimal nutritional status(Reference White, Bégin and Kumapley6). Overall, dietary diversity mirrors dietary quality and quantity and food security(Reference Ruel7) and is a helpful indicator of the level of micronutrient adequacy(Reference Arsenault, Yakes and Islam8). It is one of the recommended measures for the Global Nutrition Monitoring Framework, which is essential to monitor global nutrition targets(9). In 2008, the WHO advised that all infants and young children should have received at least four of seven food groups (minimum dietary diversity (MDD-7)): (1) grains, roots and tubers; (2) legumes and nuts; (3) dairy products; (4) flesh foods; (5) eggs; (6) vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; and (7) other fruits and vegetables(10). In 2017, the WHO Technical Expert Advisory group on nutrition Monitoring (TEAM) revised its definition to include the breastmilk component. Thus, MDD is now a child receiving a minimum of five of eight food groups (MDD-8)(9).

The percentage of children meeting the MDD-8 in low- and middle-income countries was low, ranging from 18 % in the sub-Saharan African region to 54 % in the Latin America and Caribbean region. In the South and Southeast Asia regions, only 29 % of children met the recommended MDD-8(Reference Baye and Kennedy11). The shift from MDD-7 to MDD-8 might lower the percentage of children meeting the dietary diversity, particularly in countries with suboptimal breast-feeding coverage at the age of 2 years(Reference Heidkamp, Kang and Chimanya12). In Indonesia, the percentage of children with MDD-7 has stagnated between 2012 (58 %)(13) and 2017 (60 %)(14). Similarly, continued breast-feeding at the age of 2 years has remained steady at 55 % during this period(13,14) . No study has estimated the trends with the new MDD-8 in Indonesia.

A secondary analysis using the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) found that MDD-7 was associated with the children’s age, maternal education, maternal access to information and household wealth(Reference Sekartaji, Suza and Fauziningtyas15). A pooled analysis of the 2012 and 2017 IDHS showed that the increased dietary diversity score was related to the children’s age, antenatal care (ANC) visits, maternal workforce participation, maternal knowledge, region and household wealth(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16). In line with previous studies in Indonesia(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16), Cambodia(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17), Myanmar(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17) and Ethiopia(Reference Aemro, Mesele and Birhanu18), household wealth was the only variable that was consistently linked to MDD-7, whereas other factors showed inconsistent results. To our knowledge, no Indonesian research has examined factors associated with MDD-8.

Understanding the trends and determinants of dietary diversity may help explain the progress towards global infant and young child nutrition targets, thus improving the design of programme interventions(Reference Na, Aguayo and Arimond19). Moreover, it is critical to conduct a study using the MDD-8 indicator due to the country’s transition to the new measure and the need for a valid interpretation of dietary diversity trends and determinants(Reference Heidkamp, Kang and Chimanya12). Thus, this study aimed to examine the trends and determinants of MDD-8 among children aged 6–23 months using nationally representative data collected from the 2007, 2012 and 2017 IDHS. Given the broad application of the previous dietary diversity measure, we also analysed the determinants of MDD-7 to enable comparisons across studies and programmes.

Methods

Data sources and study population

We used data from the IDHS collected in 2007, 2012 and 2017(13,14,20) . Administratively, Indonesia consisted of thirty-three provinces in 2007 and 2012 and thirty-four provinces in 2017. Below, the province level were districts, subdistricts and villages classified as rural or urban areas.

The total sample size was 14 990 consisted of 5015 children from the IDHS 2007, 5050 children from the IDHS 2012 and 4925 children from the IDHS 2017. Samples were selected using multistage stratified sampling. In the first stage, the survey used probability proportional to the number of households to choose subdistricts. The census blocks or sample clusters were selected from each subdistrict using systematic random sampling in the second stage. The survey team identified twenty-five households in each cluster by simple random sampling and interviewed all ever-married women in the selected households(13,14,20) . We restricted our analyses to ever-married women aged 15–49 years whose last-born child was alive and aged 6–23 months.

Outcome variables

The primary outcome was MDD among children aged 6–23 months throughout the previous day. Based on the WHO-TEAM in 2017, we defined MDD as the consumption of food from at least five of eight food groups (MDD-8): (1) grains, roots and tubers; (2) legumes and nuts; (3) dairy products; (4) flesh foods; (5) eggs; (6) vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables; (7) other fruits and vegetables; and (8) breastmilk(9). The current indicator was an updated version of MDD-7 in 2008(10) that defined the consumption of at least four of seven food groups without adding breastmilk. For this study analysis of MDD-8, we constructed the breastmilk item based on the separated question of current breast-feeding status. Table 1 presents detailed food group components.

Table 1 Dietary diversity food group components

MDD, minimum dietary diversity.

* Based on the WHO indicator of MDD of at least four of seven food groups in 2008(10).

Based on the WHO indicator of MDD of at least five of eight food groups in 2017(9).

Since the 2007 IDHS collected information on flesh foods and eggs into one single question, we could not assess flesh foods and eggs trend separately in this survey. Thus, we included the combined flesh foods and eggs in Fig. 1 to compare food group intake patterns over the survey year. We found a similar trend for each ‘flesh foods’ and ‘eggs’ and ‘combined flesh foods and eggs’ in the 2012 and 2017 surveys, which were all increasing. We also checked the determinants of MDD-8 for the 2012 and 2017 surveys, either separating or combining the flesh foods and eggs. Since the results were similar, we kept the combined flesh foods and eggs in the 2007 IDHS but separated flesh foods and eggs for the 2012 and 2017 IDHS to analyse factors associated with MDD-8.

Fig. 1 Trends of each food group consumption among children aged 6–23 months

Independent variables

We identified factors potentially related to dietary diversity based on earlier studies in Indonesia(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16) and Southeast Asia(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17) and the availability of variables across the three surveys(13,14,20) . We grouped independent variables as child, maternal, paternal, and health care, household and community factors. Child factors were age (6–11 months, 12–17 months and 18–23 months) and sex (male and female). Maternal factors included age (< 25 years, 25–34 years and ≥ 35 years), education, occupation, media access and decision-making involvement. Paternal factors included education and employment. We categorised the mother’s and father’s education as none or incompleted primary school, completed primary school, completed secondary school and completed higher education. We classified the mother’s occupation into three categories: ‘working in the agricultural sector’, ‘working in the non-agricultural sector’ and ‘not working’. Since there were few unemployed fathers, we developed two categories: ‘not working or working in the agricultural sector’ and ‘working in a non-agricultural sector’. Maternal access to media indicated the mother’s exposure to mass media, such as reading newspapers/magazines, listening to the radio or watching television at least once a week. We constructed maternal involvement in the decision-making based on the final say on one of the following situations: accessing health care for themselves, making major household purchases, or visiting their family and relatives. We considered mothers participated in the decision if they decided by themselves or jointly with their husbands. Health care, household and community factors covered the frequency of ANC visits (< 4 and ≥ 4), the number of children under 5 years of age in the household (≤ 2 and > 2), household wealth, living residency (urban and rural) and region. The DHS used the wealth index as a proxy indicator of household socio-economic status. However, the original index was calculated for the national population, which might cause an urban bias. For this issue, we developed a composite household wealth index using the principal component analysis to weight the specific items from a list of household assets and facilities adjusted for the urban and rural populations(Reference Rutstein21). We estimated the household wealth index as the sum of the weighted scores, then categorised it into five quintiles: poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest. We grouped provinces into five regions based on their geographical location: Java and Bali, Sumatera, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, and Eastern Indonesia.

Statistical analysis

We used Stata version 16.1 (StataCorp) for all statistical testing and applied ‘svy’ commands to adjust the complex sampling design. To set up the survey design, stratification and weighting, we created an identifier for each survey before combining them into a single file. We used these unique identifiers for strata (a combination of provinces and rural–urban residency) and clusters (primary sampling units). We also divided the sampling weight by 1 000 000, since the weight variable in the DHS datasets does not have decimal points(Reference Croft, Marshall and Allen22).

The ‘svy’ command used Taylor series linear approximation to estimate the 95 % CI around the proportions of dietary diversity and each food group(Reference Wolter and Wolter23). We used univariate logistic regression to examine each determinant’s effect on dietary diversity measured by the unadjusted OR. Variables with the significance level of P < 0·25 were entered into the multiple logistic regression to create the full baseline model. We set the P-value cut-off higher to allow the inclusion of more potentially critical variables in the model. However, we set the survey year, child’s sex and parental covariates, such as mother’s age(Reference Ogbo, Page and Idoko24Reference Ahmed, Page and Arora26), mother’s occupation(Reference Ogbo, Page and Idoko24,Reference Ahmed, Page and Arora26,Reference Senarath, Godakandage and Jayawickrama27) , mother’s decision-making(Reference Ali, Arif and Shah25,Reference Senarath, Godakandage and Jayawickrama27) , mother’s access to media(Reference Ahmed, Page and Arora26,Reference Patel, Pusdekar and Badhoniya28) and father’s education(Reference Ogbo, Page and Idoko24,Reference Ahmed, Page and Arora26) as fixed variables in the multivariate analysis regardless of their significance. We removed the least important variables one by one using a manual backward elimination beginning with the full model. We also checked for possible interaction for variables: survey year, household economic status, mother’s education, access to media and residency in the final model and removed non-significant interactions. The significance level was set at P < 0·01 for the interactions. We reported the adjusted OR with 95 % CI in the final model.

Results

Trends of minimum dietary diversity among children and their characteristics

Table 2 presents the distribution of MDD-8 among different subpopulations across the survey year. Overall, the percentage of children receiving a diversified diet decreased from 53·1 % (95 % CI: 50·7 %, 55·5 %) in 2007 to 51·7 % (95 % CI: 49·6 %, 53·8 %) in 2012, then increased to 53·7 % (95 % CI: 51·8 %, 55·5 %) in 2017. While receiving a diversified diet fluctuated across most of the study factors, there was a gradual rise in MDD-8 among children aged 18–23 months, children of mothers in the youngest age group, and those in Java and Bali. On the contrary, the percentage of MDD-8 declined steadily among 6–11 months old children, children whose mothers working in agriculture, wealthier households and urban residents. Compared to MDD-8, the proportion of children meeting MDD-7 was higher across the three surveys but showed a similar pattern across the study variables (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 1).

Table 2 The proportion of minimum dietary diversity (MDD-8*) among children aged 6–23 months in Indonesia from 2007 to 2017

n: weighted counts, % (95 % CI): weighted proportion and CI.

*Based on the WHO indicator of MDD of at least five of eight food groups in 2017(9).

Figure 1 presents the trend of each food group’s consumption between 2007 and 2017. There was an increase in grains, roots and tubers, vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, and dairy products. Also, flesh foods and eggs consumption increased from 2012 to 2017. When we combined flesh foods and eggs, we also found a similar trend across the surveys. On the other hand, there was a steady decrease in children consuming legumes and nuts and breastmilk. The consumption of other types of fruits and vegetables dropped by almost half between 2007 and 2017.

Figure 2 shows dietary diversity score patterns against the child’s age from local polynomial smoothing estimates. In general, dietary diversity increased gradually with increasing age. The 6-month dietary diversity differences varied between the surveys, with the 2017 IDHS survey having the lowest mean dietary diversity score. However, the differences became narrower by 10 months and remained small after that age. On average, children in all three surveys consumed four food groups when they reached 9 months, while five were achieved by the age of 18–23 months, except for the earliest survey.

Fig. 2 Mean of dietary diversity score by the child’s age in months

Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity

Table 3 presents unadjusted and adjusted OR of MDD-8 determinants by pooling data from 2007 to 2017. There was a dose–response association between the child’s age and MDD-8, with the highest odds among children aged 18–23 months (3·5 times). Level of education and access to media were among the maternal factors that were significantly related to MDD-8. Compared to mothers with no formal education, children whose mothers completed primary, secondary and higher education were 1·3–2·3 times more likely to consume a diversified diet. Mothers with weekly access to media had a 21 % greater odds of having children meeting the MDD-8 standard than mothers without weekly access to media. Fathers working in the non-agricultural sector were 1·3 times more likely to have children meeting MDD-8 than fathers with agricultural work or without a job. The odds of meeting the MDD-8 criterion was 23 % higher among children whose mothers had an ANC history of at least four visits than those with less than four visits. Compared to the poorest, children from the poorer, middle, richer and richest households had 18 %, 23 %, 48 % and 57 % greater odds of eating a diversified diet, respectively. Among the community-level factors, rural children had a 3 % lower odds of reaching MDD-8 than urban children. Using Java and Bali as the reference, children living in Sulawesi and Eastern Indonesia were 1·3 and 1·5 less likely to meet MDD-8, respectively. The associated factors were similar to those related to MDD-7, except maternal occupation and region (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 2).

Table 3 Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity (MDD-8*) among children aged 6–23 months in Indonesia showing unadjusted and adjusted OR from 2007 to 2017

OR, unadjusted OR; AOR, adjusted OR; Ref, reference; P, P-value.

* Based on the WHO indicator of MDD of at least five of eight food groups in 2017(9).

Independent variables adjusted for survey year, child factors (age and sex), maternal factors (age, education, occupation, access to media and involvement in decision-making), paternal factors (education and occupation), and health care, household and community factors (ANC visits, postnatal care, household wealth, number of children, living residency and region).

In addition, we ran logistic regression analyses for each survey period to help understand whether the determinants of MDD-8 were stable or shifting across time (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 3). Only children whose mothers completed higher education had relatively higher odds (2·6 times) of meeting MDD-8 in 2007. However, this trend changed in the later surveys, whereby children whose mothers completed at least primary school in 2012 and at least secondary school in 2017 were significantly more likely to meet MDD-8. Children of mothers with weekly access to media had a 21 % greater odds of meeting MDD-8 in 2007 than those whose mothers did not have weekly access to media. However, this trend shifted in 2012 and 2017, where the mother’s weekly access to media was not significantly associated with MDD-8. While the previous surveys did not find a significant association between parent’s occupation and MDD-8, children whose mothers and fathers worked in non-agricultural sectors were 45 % and 30 % more likely to meet MDD-8, respectively, in 2017. Among the health care-related factors, only ANC visits in 2017 and postnatal care in 2012 remained positively associated with MDD-8 in the adjusted analysis. Only children in the richest wealth quintile had greater odds (1·6 times) of meeting MDD-8 in 2007 than those in the poorest quintile. However, this pattern of household wealth changed in later surveys. Compared to children in the poorest quintile, children from the poorer, middle, richer and richest quintiles had greater odds of meeting MDD-8 in 2012, while children from the middle, richer and richest quintiles had greater odds of meeting MDD-8 in 2017. The odds of meeting the MDD-8 standard were 3 % lower in 2007 and 4 % lower in 2012 among children in rural areas than in urban areas. We did not find a significant relationship between residency and MDD-8 in 2017 in the adjusted analysis. In all three surveys, children living in Sulawesi and Eastern Indonesia remained less likely to meet MDD-8 than those living in Java and Bali.

Interaction analyses on the factors associated with MDD-8

We found significant interactions between the mother’s education and household wealth (P = 0·006) and between the mother’s access to media and household wealth (P < 0·001) during our investigation on the model assessing factors related to MDD-8. From this model (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 4), we examined the combined effect of these factors on the percentage of children meeting MDD-8. As shown in Fig. 3, we found that the MDD-8 increases with household wealth among mothers with higher education but fluctuates among mothers with lower education. Additionally, the probability of children meeting MDD-8 increases with household wealth among mothers without weekly access to media but remains almost the same among mothers with weekly access to media.

Fig. 3 The combined effect of household wealth and mother’s education (P = 0·006) (a) and household wealth and mother’s access to media (P < 0·001) (b) on MDD-8 adjusted for other covariates. MDD, minimum dietary diversity

Discussion

Main findings

This study analysed the MDD trends among infants and young children in Indonesia and the possible determinants at the child, parent, household, health care and community levels. Following a decline in MDD-8 among Indonesian infants and young children between 2007 and 2012, consuming at least five food groups increased from 2012 to 2017. The consumption of grains, roots and tubers, flesh foods, eggs, and dairy products rose over the past decade. Conversely, legumes and nuts, breastmilk, and other fruits and vegetables depicted a declining trend. Using the pooled data from 2007 to 2017, we found that the odds of meeting MDD-8 decreased with the survey year. The adjusted analysis showed an association between MDD-8 and the child’s age, maternal educational level, maternal access to media, paternal occupation, ANC visit, household wealth index, residency, and region. However, the child’s age, maternal education and household wealth were among the factors consistently associated with MDD-8 across the three surveys.

Trends of minimum dietary diversity and food group consumption

A study conducted in Nepal found a similar dietary diversity trend, with 32 % of children in 2006 meeting the MDD-7 criterion, decreasing to 28 % in 2011 before rising to 36 % in 2014. The pattern was not influenced by improvements in maternal education and access to health care over time, suggesting broader issues were important in Nepal(Reference Na, Aguayo and Arimond19). Economic changes may affect the dietary habits and dietary quality in a population. The deterioration in dietary diversity between 2007 and 2012 might be affected by the prolonged effect of the 2007/2008 global food crisis that significantly hit the Indonesian households, resulting in the consumption that focused on sustaining dietary energy intake but a less varied diet(Reference Salim29). As part of the responses to the crisis, the Indonesian government made several efforts to improve community nutrition through the Rice for the Poor programme(Reference Salim29), national policy on dietary diversification (e.g. the 2012 Law on Food of the Republic of Indonesia(30) and the 2014 Balanced Nutrition Guideline(31)) and food price subsidies(32). There was also a tremendous increase in small and medium enterprises and the female labour force participation to improve the household purchasing power(32). These changes might have reversed adequate child dietary diversity in 2017 by about 53 %, to a level similar to the pre-crisis situation. However, after accounting for other study variables in the adjusted analysis, we found that children were less likely to meet MDD-8 in 2012 and 2017 compared to 2007. The results suggest that different characteristics of the children might influence MDD-8.

Similar to our findings, there was an upward pattern in the consumption of eggs, dairy products, and vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables in Cambodia(33). Conversely, there was a decrease in grains, roots and tubers in Cambodia 2005–2014(33) and Nepal 2001–2014(Reference Na, Aguayo and Arimond19). We also identified a trend difference for legumes, nuts, and other fruits and vegetables between Indonesia and Cambodia, where these food groups increased slightly(33).

Our findings indicate that infants and young children in Indonesia consumed higher energy and fat intakes from animal source foods but decreased plant-based foods consumption. There has been a major shift in how food is produced and consumed in Indonesia. The Rice for the Poor programme distributed to all regions during the crisis replaced the local staple food (e.g. maize in East Nusa Tenggara and sago in Maluku) with rice(32). Even young people considered rice to be more prestigious than the local food. Since rice has dominated the population’s consumption and served as the primary source of vegetable protein(32), this might underline the downward trend in legumes, nuts and other vegetable consumption. There was also a lifestyle change marked by women’s participation in the workforce resulting in the dietary shift to eating outside the house and consuming fast food(32). The increase in women’s participation in the workforce also led to mothers being unable to breastfeed their children optimally, as shown in the declining trend of current breast-feeding status.

Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity

Our study findings are similar to previous national-level studies in other countries, suggesting a significant association between the child’s age and dietary diversity(Reference Aemro, Mesele and Birhanu18,Reference Senarath, Godakandage and Jayawickrama27,Reference Patel, Pusdekar and Badhoniya28) . A potential explanation for older infants to consume a more diversified diet could be their readiness to accept food with various forms (e.g. textures and tastes) and their greater familiarity with food than younger infants(Reference Mura Paroche, Caton and Vereijken34). In Indonesia, food culture may also affect child feeding practices. As soon as infants started eating, rice was the primary preference because it was considered precious. Some infants below 1 year of age only received rice porridge and water from boiled vegetables, while family food would be given after 1 year(Reference Ibnu, Thaha and Jafar35). In some regions, young infants were not allowed to consume fish(Reference Ibnu, Thaha and Jafar35,Reference Blaney, Februhartanty and Sukotjo36) and peas(Reference Blaney, Februhartanty and Sukotjo36).

Consistent with earlier studies in Indonesia(Reference Sekartaji, Suza and Fauziningtyas15,Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17) and in other low- and middle-income countries(Reference Aemro, Mesele and Birhanu18,Reference Ogbo, Page and Idoko24,Reference Senarath, Godakandage and Jayawickrama27,Reference Patel, Pusdekar and Badhoniya28) , we found that mothers with higher educational levels tend to feed their children with a more diversified diet. Highly educated mothers might have more information and better understand educational messages, and they might also have learnt about child feeding at school(Reference Solomon, Aderaw and Tegegne37). The trend showed a much smaller influence of mother’s education on MDD-8 in 2007, where only children whose mothers completed a higher degree were more likely to meet MDD-8. The effect increased in the subsequent surveys. Children of mothers with at least primary education in 2012 and at least secondary education in 2017 were more likely to meet MDD-8 than children of mothers without formal education. The improvement noticed can be explained by the improved quality of the Indonesian education and health systems(Reference Mahendradhata, Trisnantoro and Listyadewi38).

We also found a significant relationship between mother’s access to any media (i.e. newspaper, magazine, radio or television at least once a week) and MDD-8, as also observed in Ethiopia(Reference Ahmed, Page and Arora26) and India(Reference Patel, Pusdekar and Badhoniya28), but not in Myanmar(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17). Mass media was considered a reliable source of information that could be influencing behaviour(Reference Dafursa and Gebremedhin39). For example, the Indonesian Ministry of Health has circulated the Ten Balanced Nutrition Messages via different mass media, including ‘Be thankful and eat a variety of food’, a key message for improving dietary diversity(40). The stratified analysis showed that mother’s access to media was associated with MDD-8 only in 2007 but not in later surveys. This finding indicates that the delivery of nutrition information has shifted from printed media, radio and television to the internet. Moreover, the use of printed media and radio has declined sharply over time(41).

In contrast to our study, the father’s occupation was not a determinant of child dietary diversity in Myanmar and Cambodia(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17). Our finding suggests that working in agricultural fields might not generate sufficient income. While smallholder farmers dominate Indonesian agriculture, a study in East Kalimantan showed that paddy and non-paddy farming jobs only contributed to 42·3 % and 50·7 % of household income, respectively(Reference Karmini and Karyati42). In a stratified analysis, paternal occupation and MDD-8 were only linked in 2017, but not in the earlier surveys, suggesting a disparity in MDD-8 among children based on the paternal work in the latest survey.

Previous Indonesian studies reported a dose–response relationship between household wealth and dietary diversity(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16,Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17) . In our study, children from the wealthiest families had the greatest chance of experiencing a diverse diet, followed by children from progressively poorer families. More affluent families could afford a range of animal and plant source foods(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16). While the 2007 survey only showed a significant relationship between the richest household and MDD-8, the trend shows a more substantial effect of household wealth in 2012 and 2017. MDD-8 was associated with middle, richer and richest households indicating that a varied diet was more accessible to a broader population.

ANC visit frequency was significantly associated with child dietary diversity in our study and studies from Nepal(Reference Na, Aguayo and Arimond19) and India(Reference Patel, Pusdekar and Badhoniya28). However, we only found a significant relationship in 2017 but not in earlier surveys in our stratified analysis. Maternal visits to ANC reflected maternal access to services related to health and nutrition. For example, mothers might obtain information about appropriate child feeding through a counselling session during ANC(Reference Sebayang, Dibley and Astutik16). Our results indicate that ANC should continue providing counselling and education related to infant and young child feeding practices. Besides, barriers to ANC service quality, such as the long queue and short counselling time(Reference Arsenault, Jordan and Lee43), and insufficient knowledge and training of the health workers(Reference Ruwayda44), should be eliminated.

In agreement with our findings, an earlier study in China(Reference Wang, Liu and Fan45) reported a more diversified diet among urban residents than rural residents. Similarly, in Cambodia and Myanmar, the likelihood of infant and young children reaching MDD varied across geographical regions(Reference Harvey, Newell and Padmadas17). Less access to food and lower economic status might explain the higher risk of low dietary diversity among children from rural areas(Reference Wang, Liu and Fan45). Variations of food traditions or the availability of foods(Reference Ng, Dibley and Agho46) might also have contributed to the geographical differences. However, unlike the previous surveys, the trend analysis showed no significant link between residence and MDD-8 in 2017, implying that living in urban areas does not necessarily mean eating a diverse diet.

Interactions between household wealth and mother’s education and between household wealth and mother’s access to media on minimum dietary diversity

We found interactions between household wealth and mother’s education and between household wealth and mother’s access to media on MDD-8. These interactions showed a high proportion of children meeting MDD-8 across household wealth categories among highly educated mothers but not among mothers with lower levels of education. This finding suggests socio-economic inequalities in MDD-8 in Indonesia, as reported in a previous study in low- and middle-income countries(Reference Gatica-Domínguez, Neves and Barros47). Additionally, we found a high proportion of children meeting MDD-8 across household wealth groups among mothers without weekly access to media. However, the proportion of children meeting MDD-8 was steady across household wealth groups among mothers with weekly access to media. This finding indicates that maternal access to media may reduce the gap in consumption of a diversified diet between rich- and low-income families.

Strengths and limitations

This paper is the first to report dietary diversity trends and determinants based on the nationally representative samples from 2007 to 2017 in Indonesia using the most updated MDD indicator (MDD-8)(9). Moreover, we also presented the results for the previously used indicator (MDD-7)(10). The statistical analysis was adjusted for the DHS complex sampling design by applying sampling weights, clustering and stratification using ‘svy’ survey commands in Stata. Limitations are that the 2007 IDHS collected flesh foods and eggs data as one item, so we could not assess their consumption separately. Our study might also have recall bias, because food intake data were collected based on maternal recall. Another limitation is the inability to infer causality because of the cross-sectional survey design.

Policy implications

This study identifies determinants of dietary diversity and offers opportunities for intervention. Notably, from 2007 to 2017, children of less-educated mothers and poor households were less likely to eat a diversified diet. Thus, prioritising maternal and household factors associated with MDD-8 might be the most promising way to reduce the burden of inadequate dietary diversity and socio-economic inequalities. Furthermore, enhancing access to nutrition-related information from various resources, such as the internet and health facilities, may help improve this outcome since the children of some poor mothers can meet MDD-8 when they have access to appropriate information. Nutrition education(Reference Kuchenbecker, Reinbott and Mtimuni48) and behaviour change communication activities(Reference Fahmida, Htet and Ferguson49) can improve infant and young child feeding practices. Such interventions should target mothers from pregnancy(Reference Fahmida, Htet and Ferguson49), particularly those of lower socio-economic status, those living in rural and underdeveloped regions where access to information is limited. Furthermore, the country will require sufficient resources to train health practitioners and community health workers(Reference Kuchenbecker, Reinbott and Mtimuni48,Reference Fahmida, Htet and Ferguson49) to deliver high-quality counselling and education for all women throughout the 1000 d of life. We should integrate nutrition with agriculture activities to improve household dietary diversity and the nutritional status of infants and young children(Reference Kuchenbecker, Reinbott and Mtimuni48,Reference Rosenberg, Maluccio and Harris50) .

Conclusion

Our findings showed that the overall prevalence of MDD has stagnated from 2007 to 2017. During this period, consuming a diversified diet was associated with a child’s age, mother’s educational attainment, mother’s access to media, father’s occupation, ANC visits, household wealth quintiles, living residency and region.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors thank ICF for providing 2007, 2012 and 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey data. This research and publication were conducted as part of the PhD study undertaken by BAP, for which she was awarded a scholarship from the Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP). LPDP did not have a role in the design, analysis and writing of this article. Financial support: None. Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest. Authorship: B.A.P., T.M.H., A.A. and M.J.D. conceptualised the study. B.A.P. carried out the statistical analysis, with technical support from T.M.H., interpreted the results and drafted the initial manuscript. T.M.H. and M.J.D. critically reviewed the statistical analysis. B.A.P., T.M.H., A.A. and M.J.D. contributed to the final draft of the manuscript. All authors provided critical input, read and approved the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: All respondents in 2007, 2012 and 2017 IDHS provided their consent before participating in the surveys. The ICF International Review Board and the National Institute for Health and Research Development of the Indonesian Ministry of Health ethically approved the surveys. We obtained all the data through the DHS website after requesting access.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material/s referred to in this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004559

References

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO) & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank (2020) Levels and Trends in Child Malnutrition: Key Findings of the 2020 Edition of the Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/jme-2020-edition (accessed July 2020).Google Scholar
National Institute of Health Research & Development–Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia (2019) Report of the 2018 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas). http://labdata.litbang.kemkes.go.id/images/download/laporan/RKD/2018/Laporan_Nasional_RKD2018_FINAL.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
de Onis, M, Borghi, E, Arimond, M et al. (2018) Prevalence thresholds for wasting, overweight and stunting in children under 5 years. Public Health Nutr 22, 175179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Health Research and Development–Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia (2013) Report of the 2013 Basic Health Research (Riskesdas). http://labdata.litbang.kemkes.go.id/images/download/laporan/RKD/2013/Laporan_riskesdas_2013_final.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Resolution WHA65.6. Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition. Sixty-fifth World Health Assembly. https://apps.who.int/nutrition/topics/wha_65_6/en/index.html (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
White, JM, Bégin, F, Kumapley, R et al. (2017) Complementary feeding practices: current global and regional estimates. Matern Child Nutr 13, e12505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruel, MT (2003) Operationalizing dietary diversity: a review of measurement issues and research priorities. J Nutr 133, 3911S3926S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arsenault, JE, Yakes, EA, Islam, MM et al. (2013) Very low adequacy of micronutrient intakes by young children and women in rural Bangladesh is primarily explained by low food intake and limited diversity. J Nutr 143, 197203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Global Nutrition Monitoring Framework: Operational Guidance for Tracking Progress in Meeting Targets for 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241513609 (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) Indicators for Assessing Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices: Part 1. Definitions. https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9789241596664/en/ (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Baye, K & Kennedy, G (2020) Estimates of dietary quality in infants and young children (6–23 months): evidence from demographic and health surveys of 49 low- and middle-income countries. Nutrition 78, 110875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidkamp, RA, Kang, Y, Chimanya, K et al. (2020) Implications of updating the minimum dietary diversity for children indicator for tracking progress in the Eastern and Southern Africa Region. Curr Dev Nutr 4, nzaa141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Indonesia (BPS), National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), Ministry of Health (Kemenkes) et al. (2013) Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2012. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR275/FR275.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), Statistics Indonesia (BPS), Ministry of Health (Kemenkes) et al. (2018) Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2017. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR342/FR342.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Sekartaji, R, Suza, DE, Fauziningtyas, R et al. (2021) Dietary diversity and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Indonesia. J Pediatr Nurs 56, 3034.Google ScholarPubMed
Sebayang, SK, Dibley, MJ, Astutik, E et al. (2020) Determinants of age-appropriate breastfeeding, dietary diversity, and consumption of animal source foods among Indonesian children. Matern Child Nutr 16, e12889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, CM, Newell, ML & Padmadas, SS (2018) Socioeconomic differentials in minimum dietary diversity among young children in South-East Asia: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys. Public Health Nutr 21, 30483057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aemro, M, Mesele, M, Birhanu, Z et al. (2013) Dietary diversity and meal frequency practices among infant and young children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: a secondary analysis of Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2011. J Nutr Metab 2013, 782931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, M, Aguayo, VM, Arimond, M et al. (2018) Trends and predictors of appropriate complementary feeding practices in Nepal: an analysis of national household survey data collected between 2001 and 2014. Matern Child Nutr 14, e12564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Indonesia (BPS) & Macro International (2008) Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey 2007. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR218/FR218.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Rutstein, SO (2008) The DHS Wealth Index: Approaches for Rural and Urban Areas. https://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-wp60-working-papers.cfm (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Croft, TN, Marshall, AM & Allen, CK (2018) Guide to DHS Statistics. https://dhsprogram.com/data/Guide-to-DHS-Statistics/index.cfm (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Wolter, KM (2007) Taylor series methods. In Introduction to Variance Estimation, pp. 226271 [Wolter, KM, editor]. New York: Springer New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogbo, FA, Page, A, Idoko, J et al. (2015) Trends in complementary feeding indicators in Nigeria, 2003–2013. BMJ Open 5, e008467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, M, Arif, M & Shah, AA (2021) Complementary feeding practices and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Pakistan. PLOS ONE 16, e0247602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, KY, Page, A, Arora, A et al. (2020) Trends and factors associated with complementary feeding practices in Ethiopia from 2005 to 2016. Matern Child Nutr 16, e12926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senarath, U, Godakandage, SSP, Jayawickrama, H et al. (2012) Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in young children in Sri Lanka: secondary data analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2006–2007. Matern Child Nutr 8, 6077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A, Pusdekar, Y, Badhoniya, N et al. (2012) Determinants of inappropriate complementary feeding practices in young children in India: secondary analysis of National Family Health Survey 2005–2006. Matern Child Nutr 8, 2844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salim, Z (2010) Food Security Policies in Maritime Southeast Asia: the Case of Indonesia. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/food_security_policies_indonesia.pdf?q=sites/default/files/publications/food_security_policies_indonesia.pdf (accessed February 2021).Google Scholar
Government of Indonesia (2012) Laws of the Republic of Indonesia on Food Number 18 in 2012. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39100 (accessed February 2021).Google Scholar
Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia (2014) Regulation of the Ministry of Health on Balanced Nutrition Guideline Number 41 in 2014. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/119080/permenkes-no-41-tahun-2014 (accessed February 2021).Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade of Republic of Indonesia (2013) Final Report: Analysis of the Dinamics of Food Consumption in the Indonesian Population. http://bppp.kemendag.go.id/media_content/2017/08/LAPORAN_DINAMIKA_POLA_KONSUMSI.pdf (accessed February 2021).Google Scholar
National Institute of Statistics/Cambodia & Directorate General for Health/Cambodia ICF International (2015) Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2014. http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR312/FR312.pdf (accessed July 2020).Google Scholar
Mura Paroche, M, Caton, SJ, Vereijken, CMJL et al. (2017) How infants and young children learn about food: a systematic review. Front Psychol 8, 10461046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibnu, IN, Thaha, ARM & Jafar, N (2013) Pola asuh pemberian makanan pendamping ASI (MP-ASI) pada ibu baduta di Tanah Adat Kajang Ammatoa Kabupaten Bulukumba (Parental complementary feeding styles among children under two in Kajang Ammatoa Customary Land, Bulukumba District). MKMI 9, 257263.Google Scholar
Blaney, S, Februhartanty, J & Sukotjo, S (2015) Feeding practices among Indonesian children above six months of age: a literature review on their potential determinants (part 2). Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 24, 2837.Google Scholar
Solomon, D, Aderaw, Z & Tegegne, TK (2017) Minimum dietary diversity and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Equity Health 16, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahendradhata, Y, Trisnantoro, L, Listyadewi, S et al. (2017) The Republic of Indonesia Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254716/9789290225164-eng.pdf (accessed July 2021).Google Scholar
Dafursa, K & Gebremedhin, S (2019) Dietary diversity among children aged 6–23 months in Aleta Wondo District, Southern Ethiopia. J Nutr Metab 2019, 2869424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia (2014) Regulations of the Ministry of Health of Republic of Indonesia on the Balanced Nutrition Guideline. http://hukor.kemkes.go.id/uploads/produk_hukum/PMK%20No.%2041%20ttg%20Pedoman%20Gizi%20Seimbang.pdf (accessed July 2021).Google Scholar
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) (2014) Landscape Report on Adolescent and Maternal Nutrition in Indonesia. https://www.gainhealth.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/adolescent-and-maternal-nutrition-in-indonesia-2014.pdf (accessed July 2021).Google Scholar
Karmini, K & Karyati, K (2018) The various sources of household income of paddy farmers in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19, 357363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenault, C, Jordan, K, Lee, D et al. (2018) Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys. Lancet Glob Health 6, e1186e1195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruwayda, R (2016) Pelaksanaan standar pelayanan antenatal oleh bidan di puskesmas Kota Jambi (Implementation of antenatal care standards by midwives at the Jambi City Health Center). MKMI 12, 2.Google Scholar
Wang, H, Liu, C, Fan, H et al. (2017) Rising food accessibility contributed to the increasing dietary diversity in rural and urban China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 26, 738747.Google Scholar
Ng, CS, Dibley, MJ & Agho, KE (2012) Complementary feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of 2007 Demographic and Health Survey data. Public Health Nutr 15, 827839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gatica-Domínguez, G, Neves, PAR, Barros, AJD et al. (2021) Complementary feeding practices in 80 low- and middle-income countries: prevalence of and socioeconomic inequalities in dietary diversity, meal frequency, and dietary adequacy. J Nutr 151, 19561964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuchenbecker, J, Reinbott, A, Mtimuni, B et al. (2017) Nutrition education improves dietary diversity of children 6–23 months at community-level: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Malawi. PLOS ONE 12, e0175216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahmida, U, Htet, MK, Ferguson, E et al. (2020) Effect of an integrated package of nutrition behavior change interventions on infant and young child feeding practices and child growth from birth to 18 months: cohort evaluation of the Baduta cluster randomized controlled trial in East Java, Indonesia. Nutrients 12, 3851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, AM, Maluccio, JA, Harris, J et al. (2018) Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions, agricultural diversity, food access and child dietary diversity: evidence from rural Zambia. Food Policy 80, 1023.10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Dietary diversity food group components

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Trends of each food group consumption among children aged 6–23 months

Figure 2

Table 2 The proportion of minimum dietary diversity (MDD-8*) among children aged 6–23 months in Indonesia from 2007 to 2017

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Mean of dietary diversity score by the child’s age in months

Figure 4

Table 3 Factors associated with minimum dietary diversity (MDD-8*) among children aged 6–23 months in Indonesia showing unadjusted and adjusted† OR from 2007 to 2017

Figure 5

Fig. 3 The combined effect of household wealth and mother’s education (P = 0·006) (a) and household wealth and mother’s access to media (P < 0·001) (b) on MDD-8 adjusted for other covariates. MDD, minimum dietary diversity

Supplementary material: File

Paramashanti et al. supplementary material

Paramashanti et al. supplementary material 1

Download Paramashanti et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Paramashanti et al. supplementary material

Paramashanti et al. supplementary material 2

Download Paramashanti et al. supplementary material(File)
File 74.8 KB