We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Byrd, B. Sharon (2006) ‘The state as a moral person’. In Byrd, B. Sharon, and Hruschka, Joachim (eds), Kant and Law (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing), pp. 379–97.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2010) ‘Kant’s sovereignty dilemma: a contemporary analysis’.The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1998) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2006) The Divided West. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (2004) ‘Völkerbund oder Weltrepublik?’. In Höffe, O. (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Zum Ewigen Frieden (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), pp. 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (2006) Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2006) ‘Kant’s arguments for the league of states’. In Caranti, L. (ed.), Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays (Rome: Luiss University Press), pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2011) Kant and Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (2006) ‘Kant’s vision, Europe, and a global federation’. In Caranti, L. (ed.), Kant’s Perpetual Peace: New Interpretative Essays (Rome: Luiss University Press), pp. 75–96.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1985) ‘The moral standing of states: a response to four critics’. In Beitz, Charles R.et al. (eds), International Ethics: A Philosophy and Public Affairs Reader (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 217–37.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus (2009) ‘Right and coercion: can Kant’s conception of right be derived from his moral theory?’. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17, 49–70.10.1080/09672550802610982CrossRefGoogle Scholar