Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T16:14:38.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Both inorganic and organic selenium supplements can decrease brain monoamine oxidase B enzyme activity in adult rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2008

Ya-Li Tang
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, no. 89, Wenhwa 1st Street, Tainan County717, Taiwan
Shih-Wei Wang
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Biological Science and Technology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, no. 89, Wenhwa 1st Street, Tainan County717, Taiwan
Shyh-Mirn Lin*
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, no. 89, Wenhwa 1st Street, Tainan County717, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Shyh-Mirn Lin, fax+886 6 2605779, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been observed that the levels of brain monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) increase during ageing. MAO catalyses the oxidative deamination of neurotransmitters, in which the by-product H2O2 is subsequently generated. Se exists naturally in inorganic and organic forms and is considered to play a key role in antioxidation functioning. The objective of the present study was to investigate two chemical forms of Se compounds for their inhibition effect on rat brain MAO-B. The total antioxidant capacity and lipid peroxidation of rats were also examined. The rats (age 7 weeks) were divided into four groups: the control group, tocopherol group (T group, positive control), selenite group (SE group, representing the inorganic Se group) and seleno-yeast group (SY group, representing the organic Se group). The rats were fed for 11 weeks with normal diets and 12 weeks with test diets. The serum total antioxidant capacity of the SE and SY groups was significantly higher than that in the control and T groups. In rat brains and livers, the lipid peroxidation levels were significantly decreased in the T, SE and SY groups. MAO-B activity showed a significant decrease in the T, SE and SY groups in rat brains but no significant change could be noted in the rat livers. In conclusion, the present study indicates that inorganic or organic Se supplementation can decrease the brain MAO-B enzyme activity in adult rats and can be accomplished by the effect of the Se antioxidation capability.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Monoamine oxidase (MAO; E.C. 1.4.3.4) is an enzyme that has two isoenzymes: type A and B. It is widely distributed in tissues including the nerves, kidneys, liver and gastrointestinal tract. The enzyme catalyses the metabolism of biologically active amine compounds and participates in the oxidative deamination reaction of a variety of amine neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, adrenaline, serotonin, etc(Reference Benedetti and Dostert1). Because of the observation that MAO-B levels are increased during ageing(Reference Jossan, Gillberg, d'Argy, Aquilonius, Langstrom, Halldin and Oreland2, Reference Nicotra, Pierucci, Parvez and Senatori3), the relationship between MAO-B and ageing-related diseases has been extensively discussed. Several neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, reveal high MAO-B in the brain, but have no difference in MAO-A(Reference Benedetti and Dostert1, Reference Jossan, Gillberg, d'Argy, Aquilonius, Langstrom, Halldin and Oreland2, Reference Saura, Luque, Cesura, Da Prada, Chan-Palay, Huber, Loffler and Richards4, Reference Sherif, Gottfries, Alafuzoff and Oreland5). In addition, inhibitors of MAO-B have been applied to Alzheimer's patients, in whom improvements have been observed(Reference Knoll6Reference Guay8).

Se is a dietary essential trace element for humans. Se can be incorporated into selenoproteins in the form of selenocysteine and selenomethionine. It is also necessary for Se-containing enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase. Glutathione peroxidase can take part in the catalysing of H2O2 to water and, consequently, it contributes to antioxidation. Therefore, Se plays a key role in antioxidation functioning. It is well known that Se possesses many benefits including protection against oxidative damage, reduction of cancer risk and regulation of immune function(Reference Rayman9Reference Ryan-Harshman and Aldoori11). Se exists naturally in inorganic (for example, selenite and selenate) and organic (for example, seleno-yeast, selenomethionine and selenocysteine) forms. These two forms vary in bioavailability and protective effects(Reference Ip12Reference Tapiero, Townsend and Tew14). As determined by the glutathione peroxidase activity and Se concentrations in tissue, organic Se sources are absorbed and retained more efficiently than the inorganic Se sources(Reference Fairweather-Tait15, Reference Qin, Gao and Huang16). In mammals, dramatic differences are found in the uptake and binding of selenite and selenomethionine by brush-border membrane vesicles(Reference Vendeland, Deagen, Butler and Whanger17). For the purpose of Se supplementation, selenite, selenomethionine and seleno-yeast are usually administered as commercial products in diets. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) can uptake Se and most of the total Se is converted to the form of selenomethionine(Reference Tapiero, Townsend and Tew14). For this reason, selenomethionine is the major Se compound in seleno-yeast.

The relationship between Se and brain function is also another interesting topic. It becomes more and more apparent that Se plays a critical role in the maintenance and modulation of brain functions(Reference Schweizer, Brauer, Kohrle, Nitsch and Savaskan18). Se is involved in the conservation of functional brain activity and protects against the oxidative stress-related brain disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and brain damage(Reference Chen and Berry19, Reference Batcioglu, Karagözler, Ozturk, Genc, Bay, Ozturk and Aydogdu20). It is widely accepted that oxidative stress is involved in the degeneration of dopaminergic cells, possibly because of the formation of H2O2 from dopamine by MAO-B or by the auto-oxidation of dopamine(Reference Sian, Gerlach, Youdim and Riederer21, Reference Jana, Maiti, Bagh, Banerjee, Das, Roy and Chakrabarti22). H2O2 can be eliminated by glutathione peroxidase, an Se-containing enzyme. Se chemical compounds have also been suggested for use in Alzheimer's disease prevention trials(Reference Doraiswamy and Xiong23).

It has been observed that there was an increase of dopamine turnover in rats that were fed on an Se-deficient diet(Reference Castano, Ayala, Rodriguez-Gomez, de la Cruz, Revilla, Cano and Machado24). However, there are few publications that have proposed the relationship between MAO-B enzyme activity and supplementing with different types of Se compounds in adult rats. In summary for the correlation among Se, MAO-B, ageing and other oxidative brain damage we would like to propose the possibility of Se influence on the MAO-B reaction. Because of the different chemical forms and distinct bioavailability, we selected two chemical forms of Se compounds for their inhibition effect on MAO-B. The present study was undertaken in order to discuss the possibility of the prevention capability of Se on MAO-B enzyme activity in adult rats.

Materials and methods

Materials

AIN-76-based diets were purchased from ICN Biomedicals (Los Angeles, CA, USA). The α-tocopherol, sodium selenite, 2,2-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride, β-phycoerythrin, Trolox, TCA, thiobarbituric acid, 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-methylphenol and benzylamine were all purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Seleno-yeast was supplied by the product VIVA Selenium Yeast (Westar Nutrition Corp., Costa Mesa, CA, USA).

Animals and diets

The experimental design was approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology. Twenty-four male Long–Evans rats (age 7 weeks) were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center. Rats were housed individually in stainless-steel wire-bottomed cages in a room with a controlled temperature and 12 h light and dark cycles. Food and distilled water were provided ad libitum. The animals were fed on chow diets for 10 weeks and then were fed on diets based on AIN-76 for 1 week. Then, the rats were divided into four groups: control group, tocopherol group (T group, positive control), selenite group (SE group, representing the inorganic sodium selenite supplement group) and seleno-yeast group (SY group, representing the organic seleno-yeast supplement group). The assigned procedure was randomly by body weight in order to equalise the mean body weight of the rats in each group. The compositions of the experimental diets for the four groups are shown in Table 1. The concentration of Se in the fortified test diets was adjusted to 2 mg Se equivalent per kg diet in the SE and SY groups. Food intake and body weight were recorded every 3 d.

Table 1 Composition of test diets

After 12 weeks, adult rats were fasted for 12 h and then were killed by carbon dioxide inhalation. Their blood was collected into tubes followed by centrifugation (3000 g; 20 min; 4°C) to separate the serum. The rat brains and livers were removed and stored at − 80°C for the experiments as described below.

Serum oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay

The total antioxidant capacity in the serum of rats was estimated by an oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay(Reference Cao, Alessio and Cutler25). The 0·01 ml diluted rat serum contained 2,2-azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (75 mm; 0·01 ml), β-phycoerythrin (0·4 μm; 0·015 ml) and sodium phosphate buffer to 0·25 ml final volume. The assay mixture was incubated at 37°C and the fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 492 nm and an emission wavelength of 565 nm for 200 min. Trolox was used for the standard curve and antioxidant equivalent calculations. The final results were calculated using the differences of the areas under the fluorescence curves during 200 min, in which they were expressed as μmol Trolox equivalents/l serum.

Lipid peroxidation assay

Lipid peroxidation in rat brains and livers was estimated fluorescently by the modified thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) method(Reference Niehaus and Samuelsson26). In brief, 0·5 ml of tissue homogenate (in potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7·4) was treated with 0·5 ml of TCA solution (10 %) and centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min. The clear supernatant fraction was collected and treated with thiobarbituric acid solution (0·4 % in 0·2 m-HCl) and 2,6-ditertbutyl-4-methylphenol (0·2 % in 95 % ethanol), and then placed in a 50°C water-bath for 1 h. n-Butanol was added to the cooled solution and centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min. The clear supernatant fraction was collected and used for the measurement of fluorescence at an excitation wavelength of 515 nm and an emission wavelength of 550 nm (Hitachi F-4500 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Monoamine oxidase B activity assay

MAO-B enzyme activity in rat tissue was measured by a modification of a standard assay procedure(Reference McEwen and Cohen27). Tissues were homogenised in 0·2 m-phosphate buffer (pH 7·4) and centrifuged at 1000 g for 10 min (4°C). The supernatant fraction was collected and further centrifuged at 17 000 g for 30 min (4°C). The pellet was collected and re-suspended in 1 ml phosphate buffer (0·2 m; pH 7·4). Benzylamine solution (0·3 ml; 8 mm) was added to 0·125 ml re-suspended pellet solution, and then adjusted to the final volume of 3 ml by phosphate buffer. The mixture was shaken at 37°C for 3 h. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0·3 ml of 60 % perchloric acid. The reaction product benzylaldehyde was extracted with 3 ml cyclohexane. The organic phase was separated by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min, and read for absorbance at 242 nm (Hitachi U-2001 spectrophotometer). The protein concentration assay method was used as described by Lowry et al. (Reference Lowry, Rosebrough, Farr and Randall28). For verifying purposes, pargyline (MAO-B inhibitor) was used to confirm the type of MAO isoforms.

Statistical analysis

Values are presented as means and standard deviations from all the sets of independent experiments. Differences between the groups were studied by using one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan's multiple-range test. Differences between the control and experimental groups for all the parameters were analysed by using Student's t test. The difference was considered significant when P was 0·05 or less. The correlation among the serum oxygen-radical absorbance capacity, brain TBARS, liver TBARS, brain MAO and liver MAO was analysed by using the Pearson correlation. Statistical analysis was furthered by using a SAS statistical computer program (version 13.0.161; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The data for the rats that were fed on test diets through the experimental period are shown in Table 2. At the end of 12 weeks of Se supplementation, there were no significant differences in the rats' body weight, body-weight gain, food intake or feed efficiency between the four groups. This shows that the fortified constituents have no influence on rat growth and food intake. However, after the rats were fed on test diets for 12 weeks, the SE and SY groups' serum total antioxidant capacity was significantly higher than that in the control and T groups (P < 0·05) (Fig. 1). In addition, the T group had no marked differences from the control group. The SE and SY groups were shown to have an equal effect of the total antioxidant capacity compared with the other groups.

Table 2 Body-weight gain, food intake and feed efficiency of the rats fed on test diets (eight rats per group)*

(Mean values and standard deviations)

* There are no significant differences between the groups (Duncan's multiple-range test; P < 0·05).

Fig. 1 The effect of total antioxidant capacity in the serum of rats fed control (c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test). ORAC, oxygen-radical absorbance capacity.

The lipid peroxidation status in the brains and livers of the control, T, SE and SY groups of rats was tested by the TBARS method. The brain and liver relative TBARS levels of the rats that were fed on four test diets for 12 weeks are shown in Fig. 2. In the rat brains, the TBARS levels were significantly decreased in the T, SE and SY groups (P < 0·05) (Fig. 2 (a)). A significant decrease in the rat liver TBARS levels of the T, SE and SY groups were also shown (P < 0·05) (Fig. 2 (b)). It was demonstrated that the inorganic Se (selenite) and organic Se (seleno-yeast) supplements exhibit a similar lipid peroxidation-preventive effect on α-tocopherol in rats, which is caused by ageing.

Fig. 2 The brain (a) and liver (b) relative thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) fluorescence of rats fed control(c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test).

The MAO-B enzyme activities in rat brains and livers are shown in Fig. 3. In the rat brains, MAO-B activity showed a significant decrease in the T, SE and SY groups (P < 0·05). However, no significant change could be noted with respect to MAO-B activities in the rat livers between each group. For confirming the type of MAO isoforms, we also tested the MAO type by treating pargyline (MAO-B inhibitor) in partial tissue samples and demonstrated a decrease in MAO-B enzyme activity.

Fig. 3 Brain (a) and liver (b) monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity of rats fed control (c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Activity is given in units (U) of nmol/h per mg protein. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test).

The correlation statistical analyses among the total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation and MAO activity are shown in Table 3. Brain MAO activity has a positive correlation with brain and liver lipid peroxidation. Nevertheless, liver MAO has a negative correlation with serum total antioxidant capacity. In addition, there is a negative correlation between serum total antioxidant capacity and brain lipid peroxidation, and a positive correlation between brain and liver lipid peroxidation.

Table 3 Correlation among total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation and monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity

TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; ORAC, oxygen-radical absorbance capacity.

Discussion

Se is an essential micronutrient at levels of about 0·1 parts per million (ppm) in the animal diet, but it is toxic at levels of 8 or 10 ppm(Reference Ip12, Reference Jacobs and Forst29). Moreover, Se possesses advanced effects, such as anticarcinogenesis, usually at levels above dietary requirement in the range of 1–5 ppm(Reference Ip12). In this experiment, control and T group diets provided 0·1 mg Se/kg. It is the standard diet recommended by the American Institute of Nutrition for growth and maintenance of rodents. Similarly, previous studies indicated that 0·1 mg Se/kg diet provides an Se-adequate intake for rats(Reference Crosley, Meplan, Nicol, Rundlof, Arner, Hesketh and Arthur30). The Se doses used in the SE and SY groups were high for rats. To realise the advanced effect of Se supplementation, the Se administration level in the SE and SY groups should be increased more than adequate dietary content. Se (as sodium selenite) dietary formulas of 0·2 and 2 mg/kg have been used to ascertain chemopreventive mechanisms of Se in rats and mice(Reference Uthus and Ross31). It has previously also been demonstrated that when fed in a diet supplemented with 3 ppm Se (as either sodium selenite and Se-garlic), Se exerts its cancer-preventive activity(Reference Jiang, Jiang, Ip, Ganther and Lu32). In addition, diets containing either 0·225 or 4·2 mg Se/kg (as sodium selenite) were fed as part of the design in rat heart function research(Reference Sayar, Ugur, Gurdal, Onaran, Hotomaroglu and Turan33). Considering these dietary supplementations, 2 mg Se/kg may be appropriate to apply in the SE and SY groups.

There have been mounting discussions about MAO-B, focusing on neurotransmitter regulations, ageing-concerned diseases, molecular mechanisms, enzyme inhibitors, and so on. However, only a few reports have been discussed regarding the relationship between supplementation and MAO-B enzyme regulation. In the present study, we investigated the antioxidation regulation and MAO-B activity moderation effect of inorganic and organic Se supplements in adult rats. We found that selenite or seleno-yeast supplements can increase the total antioxidant capacity in the serum of rats (Fig. 1). In contrast to this finding, in earlier work about long-term Se deficiency rat arterial walls, a significant decrease was observed in the total antioxidant capacity, and an increase was observed after 1 month of Se (sodium selenite) supplementation(Reference Wu, Huang and Xu34). In addition, moderate Se supplementation (as sodium selenite or as Se-rich food) caused an increase in the total antioxidant activity in rat hearts(Reference Danesi, Malaguti, Nunzio, Maranesi, Biagi and Bordoni35). Nevertheless, there are fewer studies noted about seleno-yeast supplementation for the effect of total antioxidant capacity. The T (α-tocopherol supplement) group showed no significant difference from the control group (see Fig. 1). The total antioxidant capacity assay of rat serum in our research was evaluated according to the oxygen-radical absorbance capacity method which is based on the absorbance capacity of oxygen radicals by antioxidants. However, the reaction of α-tocopherol is not a reaction with oxygen, but with fatty acid peroxyl radicals, and intercepts the chain reaction. Thus the antioxidant reaction is not the removal of oxygen but the interception of the auto-oxidation radical chain process which is perpetuated by fatty acids(Reference Schneider36). It may be due to this that T groups showed no significant difference from the control group. Because of the reaction features, tocopherol would protect lipid peroxidation and cause a decrease in the TBARS assay level. It also explains the result that a significant decrease was observed in the T group of the rat TBARS levels.

Previous studies proposed that selegiline, a selective irreversible MAO-B inhibitor, is able to reduce the TBARS levels in rat brain tissue(Reference Kiray, Uysal, Sonmez, Acikgoz and Gonenc37, Reference Budni, de Lima, Polydoro, Moreira, Schroder and Dal-Pizzol38). In the present study, it was demonstrated that there is a positive correlation between brain MAO activity and lipid peroxidation of brain and liver (Table 3). A possible link between MAO activity and lipid peroxidation can be assumed, at least in part, which remains for further investigation. However, since the similar protective action to lipid peroxidation of the T, SE and SY groups was shown in both rat brains and livers (Fig. 2), this shows that these antioxidants may affect the rat physiological function and in turn lead to a lipid peroxidative protection effect. These results can be explained by the important role of Se in preventing lipid peroxidation(Reference El-Demerdash39Reference El-Demerdash41).

MAO-B levels are increased during ageing(Reference Jossan, Gillberg, d'Argy, Aquilonius, Langstrom, Halldin and Oreland2, Reference Nicotra, Pierucci, Parvez and Senatori3). Nevertheless, the T, SE and SY groups demonstrated a significant decrease in MAO-B activity compared with the control group in rat brains. Brain MAO catalyses the oxidative deamination of a variety of amine neurotransmitters, and then the by-product H2O2 will be generated. H2O2 is widely believed to be one of the sources of oxidative stress and induces physiological peroxidation. To summarise the results of the increased serum total antioxidant capacity and decreased organ lipid peroxidation, it can be claimed that both the inorganic and organic Se supplements can positively affect the improvement of the physiological antioxidative status. By preventing physiological peroxidation, brain MAO-B activity was kept from increasing during the study period. In addition, it is interesting to note that rat brain MAO-B activity exhibited a decrease in the T group. There are few studies that indicate the effect of tocopherol supplementation in MAO-B activity. In our opinion, this is the first demonstration that tocopherol supplementation is effective in decreasing MAO-B activity in rat brain. α-Tocopherol is an isoform of lipid-soluble vitamin E, and is well known as an antioxidant. It seems therefore reasonable to assume that tocopherol conducts these effects via protecting tissue peroxidation. The further mechanisms remain to be investigated. However, rat liver MAO-B activity exhibited a non-significant difference among the groups. In Table 3, brain MAO activity has a positive correlation with brain and liver lipid peroxidation, but there is no correlation between liver MAO activity and brain or liver lipid peroxidation. This may be due to the reason of different functions between brain MAO (for amine neurotransmitters transformation) and liver MAO (for foreign amine compounds detoxification)(Reference Raciti, Mazzone, Raudino, Mazzone and Cambria42).

We also investigated the influence of lipid peroxidation and total antioxidant capacity on brain MAO activity (Table 3). Table 3 shows that physiological lipid peroxidation has a positive correlation with brain MAO activity, but serum total antioxidant capacity has not the same correlation with brain MAO activity. We propose that lipid peroxidation should play an important role in brain MAO activity. There are reverse results of these correlations among liver MAO activity, serum total antioxidant capacity, and brain and liver lipid peroxidation. The results can at least partly explain the diverse inhibition effect of Se supplements on brain and liver MAO activity in rats.

It is well known that MAO inhibitors, such as pargyline and l-deprenyl, have been shown to protect against central nervous system oxygen toxicity in rats by decreasing intracellular H2O+ production from the oxidation of catecholamine in the brain(Reference Zhang and Piantadosi43, Reference Nagatsu and Sawada44). In addition, MAO inhibitors possess the therapeutic value of MAO inhibition effect in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and depressive illness, although some side effects are still unavoidable(Reference Nagatsu and Sawada44, Reference Youdim and Bakhle45). Some MAO inhibitors showed further advances of tissue selectivity in that they inhibited MAO enzymes in the brain, but caused little inhibition of the enzymes in the liver(Reference Mandel, Weinreb, Amit and Youdim46, Reference Sagi, Drigues and Youdim47). Nevertheless, supplementation may be the better pathway for neuroprotection, which can be applied daily. In the present study, we suggest that inorganic or organic Se supplementation can decrease brain MAO-B enzyme activity in adult rats. Furthermore, our research proposes the possible application of Se supplements for the tissue-selective effect of dietary MAO-B inhibitors.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported partially by the National Science Council (no. NSC91-2320-B-273-001) in Taiwan. There is no conflict of interest that we should disclose.

References

1 Benedetti, SM & Dostert, P (1989) Monoamine oxidase, brain aging and degenerative diseases. Biochem Pharmacol 38, 555561.Google Scholar
2 Jossan, SS, Gillberg, PG, d'Argy, R, Aquilonius, SM, Langstrom, B, Halldin, C & Oreland, L (1991) Quantitative localization of human brain monoamine oxidase B by large section autoradiography using L-[3H]deprenyl. Brain Res 547, 6976.Google Scholar
3 Nicotra, A, Pierucci, F, Parvez, H & Senatori, O (2004) Monoamine oxidase expression during development and aging. Neurotoxicology 25, 155165.Google Scholar
4 Saura, J, Luque, JM, Cesura, AM, Da Prada, M, Chan-Palay, V, Huber, G, Loffler, J & Richards, JG (1994) Increased monoamine oxidase B activity in plaque-associated astrocytes of Alzheimer brains revealed by quantitative enzyme radioautography. Neuroscience 62, 1530.Google Scholar
5 Sherif, F, Gottfries, CG, Alafuzoff, I & Oreland, L (1992) Brain γ-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (GABA-T) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect 4, 227240.Google Scholar
6 Knoll, J (1993) The pharmacological basis of the beneficial effects of (-)deprenyl (selegiline) in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases. J Neural Transm Suppl 40, 6991.Google Scholar
7 Alafuzoff, I, Helisalmi, S, Heinonen, EH, Reinikainen, K, Hallikainen, M, Soininen, H & Koivisto, K (2000) Selegiline treatment and the extent of degenerative changes in brain tissue of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 55, 815819.Google Scholar
8 Guay, DR (2006) Rasagiline (TVP-1012): a new selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor for Parkinson's disease. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 4, 330346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Rayman, MP (2000) The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356, 233241.Google Scholar
10 Combs, GF Jr (2005) Current evidence and research needs to support a health claim for selenium and cancer prevention. J Nutr 135, 343347.Google ScholarPubMed
11 Ryan-Harshman, M & Aldoori, W (2005) The relevance of selenium to immunity, cancer, and infectious/inflammatory diseases. Can J Diet Pract Res 66, 98102.Google Scholar
12 Ip, C (1998) Lessons from basic research in selenium and cancer prevention. J Nutr 128, 18451854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Finley, JW (2006) Bioavailability of selenium from foods. Nutr Rev 64, 146151.Google Scholar
14 Tapiero, H, Townsend, DM & Tew, KD (2003) The antioxidant role of selenium and seleno-compounds. Biomed Pharmacother 57, 134144.Google Scholar
15 Fairweather-Tait, SJ (1997) Bioavailability of selenium. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, Suppl.1, S20S23.Google Scholar
16 Qin, S, Gao, J & Huang, K (2007) Effects of different selenium sources on tissue selenium concentrations, blood GSH-PX activities and plasma interleukin levels in finishing lambs. Biol Trace Elem Res 116, 91102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Vendeland, SC, Deagen, JT, Butler, JA & Whanger, PD (1994) Uptake of selenite, selenomethionine and selenate by brush border membrane vesicles isolated from rat small intestine. Biometals 7, 305312.Google Scholar
18 Schweizer, U, Brauer, AU, Kohrle, J, Nitsch, R & Savaskan, NE (2004) Selenium and brain function: a poorly recognized liaison. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 45, 164178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Chen, J & Berry, MJ (2003) Selenium and selenoproteins in the brain and brain diseases. J Neurochem 86, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Batcioglu, K, Karagözler, AA, Ozturk, IC, Genc, M, Bay, A, Ozturk, F & Aydogdu, N (2005) Comparison of chemopreventive effects of vitamin E plus selenium versus melatonin in 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mouse brain damage. Cancer Detect Prev 29, 5458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Sian, J, Gerlach, M, Youdim, MB & Riederer, P (1999) Parkinson's disease: a major hypokinetic basal ganglia disorder. J Neural Transm 106, 443476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Jana, S, Maiti, AK, Bagh, MB, Banerjee, K, Das, A, Roy, A & Chakrabarti, S (2007) Dopamine but not 3,4-dihydroxy phenylacetic acid (DOPAC) inhibits brain respiratory chain activity by autoxidation and mitochondria catalyzed oxidation to quinone products: implications in Parkinson's disease. Brain Res 1139, 195200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Doraiswamy, PM & Xiong, GL (2006) Pharmacological strategies for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 7, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Castano, A, Ayala, A, Rodriguez-Gomez, JA, de la Cruz, CP, Revilla, E, Cano, J & Machado, A (1995) Increase in dopamine turnover and tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme in hippocampus of rats fed on low selenium diet. J Neurosci Res 42, 684691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Cao, G, Alessio, HM & Cutler, RG (1993) Oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay for antioxidants. Free Radic Biol Med 14, 303311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Niehaus, WG & Samuelsson, B (1968) Formation of malonaldehyde from phospholipid arachidonate during microsomal lipid peroxidation. Eur J Biochem 6, 126130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 McEwen, CM Jr & Cohen, JD (1963) An amine oxidase in normal human serum. J Lab Clin Med 62, 766776.Google Scholar
28 Lowry, OH, Rosebrough, NJ, Farr, AL & Randall, RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Jacobs, M & Forst, C (1981) Toxicological effects of sodium selenite in Sprague–Dawley rats. J Toxicol Environ Health 8, 575585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Crosley, LK, Meplan, C, Nicol, F, Rundlof, AK, Arner, ES, Hesketh, JE & Arthur, JR (2007) Differential regulation of expression of cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in rat liver and kidney. Arch Biochem Biophys 459, 178188.Google Scholar
31 Uthus, EO & Ross, SA (2007) Dietary selenium affects homocysteine metabolism differently in Fisher-344 rats and CD-1 mice. J Nutr 137, 11321136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Jiang, C, Jiang, W, Ip, C, Ganther, H & Lu, J (1999) Selenium-induced inhibition of angiogenesis in mammary cancer at chemopreventive levels of intake. Mol Carcinog 26, 213225.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Sayar, K, Ugur, M, Gurdal, H, Onaran, O, Hotomaroglu, O & Turan, B (2000) Dietary selenium and vitamin E intakes alter β-adrenergic response of L-type Ca-current and β-adrenoceptor-adenylate cyclase coupling in rat heart. J Nutr 130, 733740.Google Scholar
34 Wu, Q, Huang, K & Xu, H (2003) Effects of long-term selenium deficiency on glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase activities and expressions in rat aorta. J Inorg Biochem 94, 301306.Google Scholar
35 Danesi, F, Malaguti, M, Nunzio, MD, Maranesi, M, Biagi, PL & Bordoni, A (2006) Counteraction of adriamycin-induced oxidative damage in rat heart by selenium dietary supplementation. J Agric Food Chem 54, 12031208.Google Scholar
36 Schneider, C (2005) Chemistry and biology of vitamin E. Mol Nutr Food Res 49, 730.Google Scholar
37 Kiray, M, Uysal, N, Sonmez, A, Acikgoz, O & Gonenc, S (2004) Positive effects of deprenyl and estradiol on spatial memory and oxidant stress in aged female rat brains. Neurosci Lett 354, 225228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Budni, P, de Lima, MN, Polydoro, M, Moreira, JC, Schroder, N & Dal-Pizzol, F (2007) Antioxidant effects of selegiline in oxidative stress induced by iron neonatal treatment in rats. Neurochem Res 32, 965972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 El-Demerdash, FM (2001) Effects of selenium and mercury on the enzymatic activities and lipid peroxidation in brain, liver, and blood of rats. J Environ Sci Health B 36, 489499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Ognjanović, BI, Marković, SD, Pavlović, SZ, Zikić, RV, Stajn, AS & Saičić, ZS (2007) Effect of chronic cadmium exposure on antioxidant defense system in some tissues of rats: protective effect of selenium Physiol Res (Epublication 25 April 2007)..Google Scholar
41 El-Demerdash, FM (2004) Antioxidant effect of vitamin E and selenium on lipid peroxidation, enzyme activities and biochemical parameters in rats exposed to aluminium. J Trace Elem Med Biol 18, 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Raciti, G, Mazzone, P, Raudino, A, Mazzone, G & Cambria, A (1995) Inhibition of rat liver mitochondrial monoamine oxidase by hydrazine-thiazole derivatives: structure–activity relationships. Bioorg Med Chem 3, 14851491.Google Scholar
43 Zhang, J & Piantadosi, CA (1991) Prevention of H2O2 generation by monoamine oxidase protects against CNS O2 toxicity. J Appl Physiol 71, 10571061.Google Scholar
44 Nagatsu, T & Sawada, M (2006) Molecular mechanism of the relation of monoamine oxidase B and its inhibitors to Parkinson's disease: possible implications of glial cells. J Neural Transm Suppl 71, 5365.Google Scholar
45 Youdim, MB & Bakhle, YS (2006) Monoamine oxidase: isoforms and inhibitors in Parkinson's disease and depressive illness. Br J Pharmacol 147, Suppl.1, S287S296.Google Scholar
46 Mandel, S, Weinreb, O, Amit, T & Youdim, MB (2005) Mechanism of neuroprotective action of the anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline and its derivatives. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48, 379387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Sagi, Y, Drigues, N & Youdim, MB (2005) The neurochemical and behavioral effects of the novel cholinesterase-monoamine oxidase inhibitor, ladostigil, in response to l-dopa and l-tryptophan, in rats. Br J Pharmacol 146, 553560.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of test diets

Figure 1

Table 2 Body-weight gain, food intake and feed efficiency of the rats fed on test diets (eight rats per group)*(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Fig. 1 The effect of total antioxidant capacity in the serum of rats fed control (c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test). ORAC, oxygen-radical absorbance capacity.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 The brain (a) and liver (b) relative thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) fluorescence of rats fed control(c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test).

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Brain (a) and liver (b) monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity of rats fed control (c), tocopherol supplement (T), sodium selenite supplement (SE) and seleno-yeast supplement (SY) diets for 12 weeks. Activity is given in units (U) of nmol/h per mg protein. Values are means for seven or eight rats, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value is significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·05; Student's t test).

Figure 5

Table 3 Correlation among total antioxidant capacity, lipid peroxidation and monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity