No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The politics of medical expertise and substance control: WHO consultants for addiction rehabilitation and pharmacy education in Thailand and India during the Cold War
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 October 2024
Abstract
This paper explores the role of World Health Organization (WHO) medical experts in ambitious projects for substance control during the Cold War in Thailand and India. The circumstances surrounding opium production in these two nations were very different, as were the reasons for requesting expert assistance from the United Nations. Whereas the Thai military regime was concerned with controlling illicit traffic to secure its borders, the Indian government wanted to direct its opium raw materials towards domestic pharmaceutical production. Overlapping and sometimes competing agendas of country governments and international agencies converged upon each project, complicating the consultants’ work and requiring careful navigation. In both cases, medicine as a science concerned with human health and well-being was subordinated to more pressing agendas. At the same time, the article argues that WHO consultants left an important impact, though not necessarily due to their skills and training in medicine. Instead, they provided exemplars of sound governance and delivery of public health in a politically stable and economically developed country.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 57 , Special Issue 2: Decentring histories of science diplomacy: cases from Asia , June 2024 , pp. 221 - 238
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science
References
1 McAllister, William B., Drug Diplomacy in the Twentieth Century: An International History, New York: Routledge, 2000Google Scholar.
2 Scott, James C., Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998Google Scholar.
3 Putnam, Robert D., ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization (1988) 42(3), pp. 427–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Haas, Peter M., ‘Epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization (1992) 46(1), pp. 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bueger, Christian, ‘From expert communities to epistemic arrangements: situating expertise in international relations’, in Maximilian Mayer, Mariana Carpes and Ruth Knoblich (eds.), International Relations and the Global Politics of Science and Technology, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014, pp. 39–54Google Scholar.
5 As per the historian's approach to theories of science diplomacy, proposed by scholars like Sönke Kunkel, context is critical. Kunkel, Sönke, ‘Science diplomacy in the twentieth century: introduction’, Journal of Contemporary History (2021) 56(3), pp. 473–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Bhattacharya, Sanjoy, Expunging Variola: The Control and Eradication of Smallpox in India, 1947–1977, New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2006Google Scholar; Amrith, Sunil, Decolonizing International Health: India and Southeast Asia, 1930–65, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994Google Scholar; Scott, Seeing Like a State.
7 McCoy, Alfred W., The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade, Brooklyn: Lawrence Hill Books, 1990Google Scholar.
8 Works like McCoy's The Politics of Heroin, originally published in the 1970s, alleged CIA involvement in the South East Asian illicit drug trade to finance the KMT and other anti-communist insurgent groups.
9 Buadaeng, Kwanchewan, ‘The rise and fall of the Tribal Research Institute (TRI): “Hill Tribe” policy and studies in Thailand’, Southeast Asian Studies (2006) 44(3), pp. 359–84Google Scholar.
10 Jonsson, Hjorleifur, ‘Phantom scandal: on the national uses of the “Thailand controversy”’, SOUJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia (2014) 29, pp. 263–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hans Manndorff, Report on the Socio-economic Survey of the Hill Tribes in Northern Thailand, Bangkok: Department of Public Welfare, Ministry of the Interior, 1962.
11 Crooker, Richard A., ‘Forces of change in the Thailand opium zone’, Geographical Review (1988) 78(3), pp. 241–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Diskul, M.L. Dispanadda, Ninnad, Ramrada, Skinner, Andrea and Rajatanarvin, Vistorn, ‘Development not drug control: the evolution of counter narcotic efforts in Thailand’, Journal of Illicit Economies and Development (2019) 1(1), pp. 80–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Feng, Cui, ‘KMT troops and the border consolidation process in northern Thailand’, Southeast Asian Studies (2022) 11(2), pp. 177–94Google Scholar.
13 Race, Jeffrey, ‘The war in northern Thailand’, Modern Asian Studies (1974) 8(1), pp. 85–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Part and parcel of the legitimizing discourse of Thai military authoritarianism was the production of docile, economically productive and self-governing citizens. Within this, idle undesirable characteristics such as addiction were to be pruned out by a paternalistic and disciplinarian state. Thongchai Winichakul, Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994, p. 150; Funahashi, Daena Aki, ‘Rule by good people: health governance and the violence of moral authority in Thailand’, Cultural Anthropology (2016) 31(1), pp. 107–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reynolds, Craig J., Seditious Histories: Contesting Thai and Southeast Asian Pasts, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006Google Scholar; Kim, Diana, Empires of Vice: The Rise of Opium Prohibition across Southeast Asia, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020Google Scholar; Laurence Monnais and Harold J. Cook (eds.), Global Movements, Local Concerns: Medicine and Health in Southeast Asia, Singapore: NUS Press, 2012.
15 Malai Huvanandana, ‘The centre for treatment and rehabilitation of opium addicts, Rangsit, Thailand’, Bulletin on Narcotics, 1 January 1962, at www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_1962-01-01_2_page002.html (accessed 31 July 2021).
16 RD SEARO to HQ, ‘Drug addiction control–Thailand’, 18 July 1962, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972), WHO Archives Geneva (henceforth all files will be from WHO archives Geneva, unless otherwise indicated).
17 Dr A.E. Arif to Police General Prasert Rujirawongse, 20 December 1961, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086.
18 James B. Petrie to Dr H. Halbach, 22 June 1962, file: SEARO-THA-086.
19 Daniel A. Chapman to A. Messing-Mierzejewski, ‘Study tour for the three fellows from Thailand’, 20 June 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
20 ‘Meeting at the department of public welfare’, 15 March 1962, file: SEARO-THA-086.
21 James B. Petrie to Dr C. Mani, ‘Subject: narcotics control, Thailand,’ 4 April 1962, file: SEARO-THA-086.
22 Leong Hon Koon, ‘The opium problem in Singapore’, Bulletin on Narcotics, 1 January 1958, at www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_1958-01-01_4_page003.html (accessed 31 July 2021); RD, SEARO, ‘Thailand: treatment and rehabilitation of drug addicts’, 23 January 1963, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086. Chief, APD, to SEARO RD, ‘Thailand 68: narcotic drugs control’, 12 July 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
23 WHO SEARO writes to WHO HQ in Geneva, ‘We should be grateful if you could locate a consultant other than Dr Leong Hon Koon. The reasons for this will be explained to you verbally as soon as the opportunity occurs’. RD/SEARO to HQ, ‘Narcotic drugs control, Thailand’, 12 February 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086, underlining in original.
24 Hugh G. Christie, Canada External Aid Office, to Dr H. Halbach, ‘Reference: Thailand 68’, 4 July 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
25 Mental Health, EURO, to Dr O.V. Baronyan, ADG/HQ, ‘Subject: Dr TH.O. Kjolstad-Norway’, 4 October 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
26 Luna to Chapman, 11 October 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
27 ‘[W]e are informed that the Ministry of the Interior (Dept. of Public Welfare) is ceasing activity in Rangsit on the grounds that effective rehabilitation of drug addicts is not being achieved, that almost all are recidivist who are frequently readmitted and that it costs too much … In future, recidivists are to be imprisoned’. RD/SEARO to HQ, ‘Subject: Dr Joel Fort-Narcotics Drug Control (Thai-68)’, 21 November 1963, file: SEARO-THA-086.
28 Steve Chawkins, ‘Joel Fort dies at 86; iconoclastic psychiatrist testified in Patty Hearst case’, Los Angeles Times, 27 August 2015, at www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-joel-fort-20150828-story.html (accessed 31 July 2021); H. Halbach to Dr J. Fort, 13 December 1963, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086.
29 Halbach to Fort, 13 December 1963, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972).
30 C. Mani to Joel Fort, 20 February 1964, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972).
31 Daniel A. Chapman to Dr Joel Fort, 26 March 1964, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972).
32 Joel Fort MD (consultant, World Health Organization), ‘Recommendations for the management of drug addiction in Thailand’, June 1964, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972), p. 16.
33 Fort, op. cit. (32), p. 15, added emphasis.
34 D.A. Chapman to Mr. A. Messing-Mierzejewski, Mr. Messing, 14 August 1964, file: SEARO-THA-086.
35 Malcolm W. Browne, ‘Thanom criticizes US report linking Thai officials to drugs', The New York Times, 26 July 1973, at www.nytimes.com/1973/07/26/archives/thanom-criticizes-u-s-report-linking-thai-officials-to-drugs-lo.html (accessed 31 July 2021).
36 Daniel Weimer, Seeing Drugs: Modernization, Counterinsurgency, and U.S. Narcotics Control in the Third World, 1969–1976, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 2011.
37 Director, PTX, to regional director, SEARO, ‘Consultation visit to Thailand-Dr Morris Seevers’, 18 February 1972, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972).
38 Verachai, V., Patarakorn, S. Dechongkit, A. and Lukanapichonchut, L., ‘Drug addicts treatment for ten years in Thanyarak Hospital (1989–1998)’, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand (2001) 84(1), pp. 24–9Google ScholarPubMed; Verachai, Viroj, Punjawatnun, Jaroonporn and Perfas, Fernando, ‘The results of drug dependence treatment by therapeutic community in Thanyarak Institute on Drug Abuse’, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand (2003) 86(5), pp. 407–17Google ScholarPubMed.
39 Dr Komol Pengsritong to Dr Gordon J. Stott, WHO Rep Thailand, 9 December 1971, file: WHO022-SEARO-THA-086 Thailand Control of Narcotic Drugs (1961–1972).
40 Dr Komol Pengsritong to Dr Gordon J. Stott, 9 December 1971, file: SEARO-THA-086.
41 His research involved administering opiates to animals and measuring withdrawal symptoms. N. Rasmussen, ‘Maurice Seevers, the stimulants and the political economy of addiction in American biomedicine’, Biosocieties (2010) 5, pp. 105–23; David T. Courtwright, ‘The classic era of narcotic control’, in D.T. Courtwright, H. Joseph and D. Des Jarlais (eds.), Addicts Who Survived: An Oral History of Narcotics Use in America, 1923–1965, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1989, pp. 1–44.
42 Fred P. Graham, ‘National commission to propose legal private use of marijuana,’ New York Times, 13 February 1972, at www.nytimes.com/1972/02/13/archives/national-commission-to-propose-legal-private-use-of-marijuana.html (accessed 31 July 2021).
43 Dr M.H. Seevers, WHO short-term consultant, ‘Assignment report on control of narcotic drugs in Thailand (rehabilitation of heroin and opium-dependent persons) (WHO project: Thailand 0068)’, WHO Regional Office for South East Asia SEA/APD/2 (5 June 1972), file: SEARO-THA-086; Report of Maurice H. Seevers, ‘Rehabilitation of heroin and opium dependent persons in Thailand’, 1972, file: SEARO-THA-086.
44 Seevers, ‘Assignment report’, op. cit. (43), p. 8, added emphasis.
45 Seevers, ‘Assignment report’, op. cit. (43), p. 11.
46 Seevers, ‘Assignment report’, op. cit. (43), p. 13, added emphasis.
47 Following the 1971 Vienna Psychotropics Convention, the UN established a Fund for Drug Abuse Control (UNFDAC), which significantly expanded the technical assistance missions of the 1960s into pilot projects. ‘Annex 3: WHO activities supported by the United Nations Fund for Drug Abuse Control’ and ‘Draft report of the work of the twenty-fifth session’, 1 February 1973, file: A2-86-2 Sessions of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs (1957–1978); I.M.G. Williams, ‘UN/Thai programme for drug abuse control in Thailand – a report on phase I: February 1972–June 1979’, UNODC (1979), at www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_1979-01-01_2_page002.html (accessed 31 July 2021).
48 Suwanwela, Charas, Kanchanahuta, Somsong and Onthuam, Yupha, ‘Hill Tribe opium addicts: a retrospective study of 1,382 patients’, Bulletin on Narcotics (1979) 31(1), pp. 23–40Google ScholarPubMed.
49 Medcalf, Alexander, Bhattacharya, Sanjoy, Momen, Hooman, Saavedra, Monica and Jones, Margaret (eds.), Health for All: The Journey of Universal Health Coverage, Telangana: Orient Blackswan, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
50 The exporter, the Indian government, and the importer, the purchasing country, would submit data on volume of trade and other matters to the UN's International Narcotics Control Board (INCB).
51 Harvard Countway Library, ‘The Erich Lindemann papers’, Center for the History of Medicine (Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine) Harvard University Library, https://hollisarchives.lib.harvard.edu/repositories/14/resources/6671 (accessed 5 June 2022).
52 After moving to the US permanently, Lindemann practiaed at Massachusetts General Hospital and lectured at Harvard University School of Medicine until retiring in 1965. He promoted community mental health, following pioneering research on the survivors of the 1942 Cocoanut Grove nightclub fire incident in Fleck, Boston. S., ‘Obituary: Erich Lindemann 1900–1974’, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (1975) 10, p. 153Google Scholar; Satin, David George, ‘Erich Lindemann: the humanist and the era of community mental health’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (1982) 126(4), pp. 327–46Google ScholarPubMed.
53 In contrast, community medicine and infectious-disease control had flourished, reflecting the priorities for public health of the Indian government at the time. Dr Erich Lindemann, ‘Assignment report on teaching of psychiatry in medical colleges WHO project: India 158’, 21 March 1960, file: WHO022-SEARO-IND-188: India Psychiatry Teaching (1960); Wu, Harry, Mad by the Millions: Mental Disorders and the Early Years of the World Health Organization, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 2021, p. 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 Lindemann, op. cit. (53), p. 1, added emphasis.
55 Lindemann's report also may have been controversial given the complex legacies of the colonial asylum, as Mills has pointed out. James Mills, ‘The history of modern psychiatry in India, 1858–1947’, History of Psychiatry (2001) 12(48), pp. 431–58.
56 R.N. Chopra, K.S. Grewal, J.S. Chowhan and G.S. Chopra, ‘Addiction to “post” (unlanced capsules of Papaver somniferum)’, Indian Journal of Medical Research (1929) 17, pp. 985–1007; Chopra, R.N. and Chopra, I.C., ‘Quasi-medical use of opium in India and its effects’, Bulletin on Narcotics (1955) 7(3–4), pp. 1–24Google Scholar; Chopra, R.N. and Chopra, I.C., Drug Addiction with Special Reference to India, New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1965Google Scholar.
57 R.N. Chopra, ‘Drug addiction in India and its treatment’, Indian Medical Gazette (1935) 70(3), pp. 121–31, 126.
58 Sir R.N. Chopra and I.C. Chopra, ‘Treatment of drug addiction: experience in India’, Bulletin on Narcotics (1957) 33, at www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/bulletin/bulletin_1957-01-01_4_page004.html (accessed 5 June 2022); Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Report of the Committee on Drug Abuse in India, New Delhi: Government of India, 1977, p. 12.
59 Chopra was influential in terms of national policy, advocating for India's self-sufficiency in medicines through the Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 and the Indian Pharmacopoeial List in 1946. He also consulted in UN narcotics control sessions, occasionally serving in the WHO's annual Expert Committees on Drug Dependence as a pharmacologist. Arnold, David, Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Power, Helen, ‘The Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine: institutionalizing medical research in the periphery’, Medical History (1996) 40, pp. 197–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
60 Basu, Malika, History of Indigenous Pharmaceutical Companies in Colonial Calcutta (1855–1947), London: Routledge, 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bhattacharya, Nandini, ‘From materia medica to the pharmacopoeia: challenges of writing the history of drugs in India’, History Compass (2016) 14(4), p. 131–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
61 Chopra, Ram Nath, ‘Problems and prospects of a pharmacological career in India’, Annual Review of Pharmacology (1965) 5, pp. 1–9, 5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
62 From WHO's perspective, improving India's pharmacological production capacities was also beneficial to its international disease control and immunization efforts. The following year, in 1956, the Indian government, WHO and UNICEF agreed that the country would maintain a domestic stockpile of emergency drugs for emergency relief measures and infectious-disease eradication drives. Roger A. Lewis, WHO visiting professor of pharmacology, ‘Final report on Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College Bombay (India) WHO project: India 52’, 10 January 1956, WHO Regional Office for South East Asia, SEA/Pharmacology/1, file: WHO022 SEARO IND 233.
63 Acker, Caroline Jean, ‘Addiction and the laboratory: the work of the National Research Council's Committee on Drug Addiction, 1928–1939’, ISIS (1995) 86(2), pp. 167–73Google ScholarPubMed.
64 Lewis, op. cit. (62), pp. 2–3, added emphasis.
65 Lewis, op. cit. (62), p. 3.
66 Lewis, op. cit. (62), p. 7.
67 Lewis, op. cit. (62), p. 3.
68 Lewis, op. cit. (62), p. 6.
69 Roger A. Lewis, Rajaninath S. Satoskar, Gopalkrishna G. Joag et. al., ‘Cortisone and hydrocortisone given parenterally and orally in severe tetanus’, Journal of the American Medical Association (1954) 156(5), pp. 479–84; Lewis, R.A., Bhagat, M.P., Wagle, M.M., Kulkarni, B.S. and Satoskar, R.S., ‘Antibiotic dietary supplements in the therapy of childhood protein malnutrition’, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (1956) 5(3), pp. 483–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Roger A. Lewis (ed.), Pharmacology for Medical Students in Tropical Areas, Bombay: Popular Book Depot, 1957; Lewis, Tropical Therapeutics: Its Pharmacologic Aspects, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1963.
70 The journal is still published. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, ‘About us’, Seth GS Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital Mumbai, at www.jpgmonline.com/aboutus.asp (accessed 31 July 2021).
71 Dr L.F. Dodson, ‘Assignment report on drug laboratory techniques and biological standardisation’, October–December 1967, file: WHO-022-SEARO-IND157 India Drug Laboratory Techniques and Biological Standardisation, 1966–1973, p. 5, added emphasis.
72 ‘Project for strengthening drug control in India’, 1968, file: WHO022-SEARO-IND157; Government of India, ‘Ch. 14 industry and minerals, Fourth Five-Year Plan (1966–1971)’, NITI Aayog, at https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/plans/planrel/fiveyr/4th/4planch14.html (accessed 31 July 2021).
73 Roger Jeffrey, ‘Commercialization in health services in India since 1980: A biographical approach’, in Rama Baru and Anuj Kapilashrami (eds.), Global Governance and Commercialisation of Public Health, London: Routledge, 2018, pp. 77–96; Pierre Chapelet, ‘India in the world of pharmaceuticals: dualities of a new challenger’, in Alain Vaguet (ed.), Indian Health Landscapes under Globalization, New Delhi: Manohar Publishers, 2009, pp. 133–72.
74 Andrew Jack, ‘The man who battled big pharma’, Financial Times, 29 March 2009, at www.ft.com/content/bd8dccee-f976-11dc-9b7c-000077b07658 (accessed 31 July 2021); Erica Check, ‘The treasure of Mumbai’, Wired, 12 January 2006, at www.wired.com/2006/12/indiadrug (accessed 31 July 2021).
75 Thirty-Fourth World Health Assembly, Verbatim Records of Plenary Meetings, Reports of Committees, 4–22 May 1981, Geneva: WHO, 1981, p. 75.