Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T10:42:33.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the decline in the magnitude of the expenditure multiplier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

Jesús Rodríguez-López  and
Mario Solis-Garcia Open the ORCID record for Mario Solis-Garcia [Opens in a new window]
Jesús Rodríguez-López
Affiliation:
Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain
Mario Solis-Garcia*
Affiliation:
Macalester College, St. Paul, MN, USA
*
Corresponding author: Mario Solis-Garcia; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the causes underlying the decline in the government expenditure multiplier after the Korean War, through the lens of a structural dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. We estimate the model using Bayesian methods and annual frequency data from 1939 to 2017. The model replicates the observed fall in the expenditure multiplier. We find that the decline is accounted for by changes in two of the model’s structural parameters, namely a decline in consumption habit persistence and a higher autocorrelation of the public expenditure processes. These changes imply a stronger negative wealth effect, a lower discretion of US fiscal policy and, consequently, a multiplier of smaller magnitude. The model identifies the news shocks to military spending, yet fiscal news plays little role in the decline of the multiplier. Rather, the news shocks account for an important fraction of medium-term variances of debt and military expenditures, which justifies their inclusion in the model.

Keywords

Business cyclesmilitary expendituregovernment multipliers
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , September 2024 , pp. 1313 - 1345
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

We thank two anonymous referees who offered helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved the paper. We also thank Gabriel Pérez-Quirós and J. Víctor Ríos-Rull, who guided us in the composition of this paper. Of course, all errors remain our own. We thank seminar participants at Macalester College, the 2017 Southern Economic Association meeting, and the 2017 Simposio de Análisis Económico. J. Rodríguez-López acknowledges financial support from MINECO (Spain) projects PID2019-107161GB-C33 (2020–2022) and PID2022-137352NB-C44 (2023–2025), Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology, and from Junta de Andalucía under project SEJ-1512.

References

Afonso, A., Agnello, L. and Furceri, D.. (2010) Fiscal policy responsiveness, persistence, and discretion. Public Choice 145(3-4), 503–530.10.1007/s11127-009-9577-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. and Gorodnichenko, Y.. (2012) Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
Barro, R. and Redlick, C.. (2011) Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(1), 51–102.10.1093/qje/qjq002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R.. (2002) An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4), 1329–1368.10.1162/003355302320935043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D. and Weber, A.. (2011) Are micro and macro labor supply elasticities consistent? A review evidence on the intensive and extensive margins. American Economic Review 101(3), 471–475.10.1257/aer.101.3.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Evans, C.. (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113(1), 1–45.10.1086/426038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coenen, G., Erceg, C., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., Kumhof, M., Lalonde, R.é, Laxton, D., Lindé, J., Mourougane, A., Muir, D., Mursula, S., de Resende, C., Roberts, J., Roeger, W., Snudden, S., Trabandt, M. and in’t Veld, J.. (2012) Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 4(1), 22–68.Google Scholar
Cogan, J., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. and Wieland, V.. (2010) New Keynesian versus old Keynesian government spending multipliers. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(3), 281–295.10.1016/j.jedc.2010.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drautzburg, T. (2020) A narrative approach to a fiscal DSGE model. Quantitative Economics 11(2), 801–837.10.3982/QE1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyrda, S. and Ríos-Rull, J.-V.. (2012) Models of Government Expenditure Multipliers. Economic Policy Paper 12-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Fatás, A. and Mihov, I.. (2006) The macroeconomic effects of fiscal rules in the US states. Journal of Public Economics 90(1-2), 101–117.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Guerrón-Quintana, P., Kuester, K. and Rubio-Ramírez, J.. (2015) Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity. American Economic Review 105(11), 3352–3384.10.1257/aer.20121236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, J., López-Salido, D. and Vallés, J.. (2007) Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association 5(1), 227–270.10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z. and Huffman, G.. (1988) Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. American Economic Review 78, 402–417.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (2009) By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 183–231.10.1353/eca.0.0069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havranek, T., Rusnak, M. and Sokolova, A.. (2017) Habit formation in consumption: A meta-analysis. European Economic Review 95, 142–167.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K. and Violante, G.. (2010) The macroeconomic implications of rising wage inequality in the United States. Journal of Political Economy 118(4), 681–722.10.1086/656632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. and Végh, C.. (2013) How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics 60(2), 239–254.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R., Plosser, C. and Rebelo, S.. (1988) Production, growth, and business cycles: I. The basic neoclassical model. Journal of Monetary Economics 21(2-3), 195–232.10.1016/0304-3932(88)90030-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, E., Plante, M. and Traum, N.. (2010) Dynamics of fiscal financing in the United States. Journal of Econometrics 156(2), 304–321.10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, E., Razin, A. and Tesar, L.. (1994) Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34(3), 297–323.10.1016/0304-3932(94)90021-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountford, A. and Uhlig, H.. (2009) What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? Journal of Applied Econometrics 24(6), 960–992.10.1002/jae.1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohanian, L. (1997) The macroeconomic effects of war finance in the United States: World War II and the Korean War. American Economic Review 87, 23–40.Google Scholar
Perotti, R. (2008) In search of the transmission mechanism of fiscal policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 22, 169–226.10.1086/ma.22.25554966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, V.A. (2009) Defense news shocks, 1939-2008: An analysis based on news sources. October 2009 manuscript.Google Scholar
Ramey, V. (2011) Identifying government spending shocks: It’s all in the timing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(1), 1–50.10.1093/qje/qjq008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, V. and Zubairy, S.. (2018) Government spending multipliers in good times and in bad: Evidence from US historical data. Journal of Political Economy 126(2), 850–901.10.1086/696277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravn, M., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M.. (2006) Deep habits. Review of Economic Studies 73(1), 195–218.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.00374.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos-Rull, J.-V. and Huo, Z.. (2013). A Realistic Neoclassical Multiplier. Economic Policy Paper 13-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M.. (2012) What’s news in business cycles. Econometrica 80(6), 2733–2764.Google Scholar
Smets, F. and Wouters, R.. (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. American Economic Review 97(3), 586–606.10.1257/aer.97.3.586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Zeev, N. and Pappa, E.. (2015) Multipliers of unexpected increases in defense spending: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 57, 205–226.10.1016/j.jedc.2015.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Zeev, N. and Pappa, E.. (2017) Chronicle of a war foretold: The macroeconomic effects of anticipated defense spending shocks. The Economic Journal 127(603), 1568–1597.10.1111/ecoj.12349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubairy, S. (2014) On fiscal multipliers: Estimates from a medium scale DSGE model. International Economic Review 55(1), 169–195.10.1111/iere.12045CrossRefGoogle Scholar