Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:24:35.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Natural history of cardiac findings in mucopolysaccharidosis type I: report from an international registry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2023

Elizabeth Braunlin*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Luisa Bay
Affiliation:
Hospital Nacional de Pediatría J. P. Garrahan, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Nathalie Guffon
Affiliation:
Centre de Référence des Maladies Héréditaires du Métabolisme, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
Meng Yang
Affiliation:
Formerly Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
Nicolas Pangaud
Affiliation:
Cardiology, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
Lorne A. Clarke
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Genetics and the British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Elizabeth Braunlin; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I is an inborn error of glycosaminoglycan catabolism with phenotypes ranging from severe (Hurler syndrome) to attenuated (Hurler–Scheie and Scheie syndromes). Cardiovascular involvement is common and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the prevalence and natural history of cardiac abnormalities in treatment-naïve individuals enrolled in the international Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry. Interrogation of echocardiography data (presence of cardiac valve regurgitation and/or stenosis; measurements of left ventricular chamber dimensions in diastole and systole, diastolic left ventricular posterior wall and interventricular septal thicknesses and ventricular systolic function (shortening fraction)) showed that mitral regurgitation was the most common and earliest finding for individuals with both severe (58.3%, median age 1.2 years) and attenuated (74.2%, median age 8.0 years) disease. Left-sided valve stenosis was also common in individuals with attenuated disease (mitral 30.3%; aortic 25%). Abnormal ventricular wall and septal thickness (Z-scores ≥2) were observed early in both phenotypes. Z-scores for diastolic left ventricular posterior wall and interventricular septal thicknesses increased with age in the severe phenotype (annualised slopes of 0.2777 [p = 0.037] and 0.3831 [p = 0.001], respectively); a similar correlation was not observed in the attenuated phenotype (annualised slopes of −0.0401 [p = 0.069] and −0.0029 [p = 0.875], respectively). Decreased cardiac ventricular systolic function (defined as shortening fraction <28%) was uncommon but, when noted, was more frequent in infants with the severe phenotype. While cardiac abnormalities occur early in both severe and attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis type I, the pattern of valve dysfunction and progression of ventricular abnormalities vary by phenotype.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease resulting from a deficiency of α-L-iduronidase, a lysosomal enzyme responsible for metabolism of the glycosaminoglycans dermatan and heparan sulfate. Reference Muenzer1 Occurring in 1/100,000 live births, Reference Moore, Connock, Wraith and Lavery2 mucopolysaccharidosis type I has a range of disease phenotypes from severe (Hurler syndrome, which always has central nervous system involvement) to attenuated (Hurler–Scheie and Scheie syndromes). Reference Muenzer1 Glycosaminoglycan accumulation results in a broad range of visceral involvement, including hepatosplenomegaly, skeletal and joint deformity (i.e., dysostosis multiplex), respiratory issues (e.g., obstructive sleep apnoea and infections), and progressive cardiac disease. Reference Beck, Arn and Giugliani3,Reference Muenzer, Wraith and Clarke4

Treatment options include hematopoietic stem cell transplant (recommended before 2 years of age) for individuals with severe mucopolysaccharidosis type I, and enzyme replacement therapy with laronidase (recombinant human α-L-iduronidase; Aldurazyme®) for the treatment of individuals with non-central nervous system manifestations, since laronidase does not cross the blood–brain barrier. Reference Muenzer, Wraith and Clarke4Reference de Ru, Boelens and Das7 In the absence of treatment, life expectancy is limited to the first decade of life for those with severe disease, while premature death due to respiratory and cardiac disease is common in the attenuated phenotype. Reference Moore, Connock, Wraith and Lavery2 The diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I requires evidence for glycosaminoglycan storage and decreased functional activity of the corresponding enzyme and/or mutation analysis. Reference Kubaski, de Oliveira Poswar and Michelin-Tirelli8,Reference Clarke, Atherton and Burton9

Regardless of disease severity, somatic findings in most individuals with mucopolysaccharidosis type I include cardiac pathology, including valvulopathy, ventricular hypertrophy, myointimal proliferation of epicardial coronary arteries, and aortic root dilation, while rhythm disturbances remain infrequent. Reference Pastores, Arn and Beck10Reference Bolourchi, Renella and Wang12 Since cardiac valvulopathy has not been reversed with current therapies, it has become a frequently studied benchmark of treatment efficacy. Reference Braunlin, Stauffer and Peters13Reference Sifuentes, Doroshow and Hoft16 Cardiac ultrasound has been the primary clinical modality used in cardiac studies of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Colour flow Doppler, which has greatly increased the ability to detect cardiac valve disease, was first reported in a study of mucopolysaccharidoses in 1995. Reference Wippermann, Beck, Schranz, Huth, Michel-Behnke and Jungst17

With the availability of hematopoietic cell transplantation and enzyme replacement therapy, obtaining the natural history of untreated mucopolysaccharidosis type I has become exceedingly difficult. Cardiac valve disease, ventricular hypertrophy, and cardiomyopathy have been previously described as disease components in untreated individuals; however, studies have involved small numbers, often from a single institution or as part of a collective study of all mucopolysaccharidoses. Reference Wippermann, Beck, Schranz, Huth, Michel-Behnke and Jungst17Reference Poswar, Santos and Santos31 Cardiac valve dysfunction, particularly involving left-sided valves, has been reported both in the very youngest children with severe disease Reference Pastores, Arn and Beck10,Reference Kiely, Kohler, Coletti, Poe and Escolar32,Reference Schroeder, Orchard and Whitley33 as well as adults with attenuated disease. Reference Pastores, Arn and Beck10,Reference Soliman, Timmermans and Nemes23,Reference Sugiura, Kubo and Ochi29,Reference Sadeghian, Sadeghian, Eslami, Abbasi and Lotfi-Tokaldany30,Reference Thomas, Beck, Clarke and Cox34,Reference Vijay and Wraith35 However, some studies report only valve “dysfunction” without further defining whether it is valve regurgitation or stenosis. Reference Dangel18 Natural history studies similarly report small numbers of patients, with most studies describing the cardiac response after either hematopoietic cell transplantation or enzyme replacement therapy. Reference Braunlin, Stauffer and Peters13Reference Lum, Stepien and Ghosh15,Reference Fesslova, Corti and Sersale20,Reference Lin, Chuang and Chen22,Reference Brands, Frohn-Mulder and Hagemans24,Reference Poswar, de Souza, Giugliani and Baldo36Reference Laraway, Mercer, Jameson, Ashworth, Hensman and Jones41

The Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry is a voluntary, observational, and global database established in 2003 to characterise the natural history of mucopolysaccharidosis type I and to evaluate clinical outcomes after enzyme replacement therapy with the ultimate goal of creating evidence-based guidelines for patient management. Reference Pastores, Arn and Beck10 A previous report from the international Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry tallying systemic complications in almost 1000 individuals reported that nearly half of those with severe disease and two-thirds with the most attenuated form had cardiac valve abnormalities, Reference Beck, Arn and Giugliani3 but the abnormalities were not further defined. Therefore, we analysed the prevalence and natural history of cardiac abnormalities in treatment-naïve individuals with mucopolysaccharidosis type I enrolled in the international Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry.

Materials and methods

Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry

The Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry (https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00144794) is supported and maintained by Sanofi (Cambridge, MA) and is overseen and directed by an independent Board of Advisors comprised of physicians who are experts in the care of people living with mucopolysaccharidosis.

All registrants have confirmation of mucopolysaccharidosis type I diagnosis by either mutation analysis or measurement of leucocyte alpha-l-iduronidase levels. Informed consent is required of all participants before enrolment in the registry. As of December 2012, each participating site has been required to have approval from an institutional review board or ethics committee for registry participation Reference Beck, Arn and Giugliani3 . Participating sites complete enrolment forms that include demographics, a multi-domain medical history related to the presence and onset of symptoms, and the type and starting date of any treatment for each participant. Clinical event forms are periodically completed for follow-up of specific aspects of disease progression.

Study population

Treatment naïve registrants with at least one echocardiography assessment prior to either hematopoietic stem cell transplant or the initiation of enzyme replacement therapy and with physician-reported phenotype were included. Data entered in the registry as of February 2017 were included. Individuals reported as having severe disease who were diagnosed at greater than 12 years old or who were 12 years or older at any echocardiographic assessment were excluded due to likely misclassification of phenotype.

Echocardiography assessments

Information on the results of echocardiography assessments is collected on a cardiovascular and respiratory clinical event form, including the presence of cardiac valve regurgitation and/or stenosis for each of the four cardiac valves (aortic, mitral, pulmonary, and tricuspid valves). Valve regurgitation and stenosis are not further quantified. Standard measurements of left ventricular chamber dimensions (in diastole and systole), and left ventricular posterior wall and interventricular septal thicknesses (the latter in diastole) are recorded. Left ventricular function, assessed by shortening fraction (a measure of the change in linear dimensions between diastole and systole expressed as a percentage of the diastolic dimension), is also recorded. A usable response was defined for all parameters as one with a yes/no or numeric response; “unknown” and “not assessed” responses were not used.

Performance and timing of voluntary echocardiography assessments were determined by treating physicians. All available echocardiography assessments completed prior to treatment initiation were used. Not all individuals had complete data in each echocardiogram report, and the number and timing of echocardiography assessments varied across participants.

Analysis subgroups

All participants with at least one echocardiogram during the natural history period with a response to at least one valve function item were included in the analyses of the prevalence and age at the first report of valvular dysfunction. Subgroups for additional analyses are shown in Supplemental Figure 1. Descriptive analyses of chamber dimensions and shortening fractions were conducted for those with both valve dysfunction data and at least one echocardiogram report of ventricular dimensions and/or shortening fraction. The mixed model analyses of changes in ventricular dimension and function over time (described below) were conducted for the subset of participants with at least two measures of cardiac dimension or function over time.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were stratified by disease phenotype (i.e., severe or attenuated). Demographic characteristics were presented as counts and percentages or as means, standard deviations, medians, and 25th to 75th percentiles, as appropriate. The presence of stenosis and/or regurgitation for aortic, mitral, pulmonary, and tricuspid valves and the corresponding ages at first reported valve dysfunction were compared between the severe and attenuated phenotypes using chi-square or (non-parametric) Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

Left posterior wall thicknesses, interventricular wall thickness, and chamber dimensions were converted to Z-scores based on body surface area using the DuBois formula. Reference Pettersen, Du, Skeens and Humes42 Height and weight for Z-score calculation were obtained from clinical evaluation forms within ±6 months of each echocardiograph report. The presence of any Z-score greater than 2 was considered abnormal. Raw values for shortening fraction as a measure of left ventricular function were collected, and values <28% were considered abnormal.

Linear mixed effect models were used to estimate changes over time for the ventricular dimension measurements and shortening fraction. These models account for repeated measures within individuals over time. An unstructured covariance matrix was used, and models were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood. The timescale was the age at each echocardiograph measurement. The final models included a random intercept and fixed effects for age, phenotype (attenuated or severe), and an interaction term between age and phenotype (i.e., age x phenotype) to allow different rates of change among those with attenuated and severe disease. An estimated slope (i.e., annual change in ventricular dimension/shortening fraction) was determined for the severe and attenuated populations. The associated p value indicated whether each slope was statistically different from zero. The p value for the interaction between phenotype and age was used to determine whether the slopes for the severe versus attenuated populations were significantly different from each other. All statistical analyses were two-sided and carried out using SAS v. 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Participant and echocardiography data

There were 1010 individuals enrolled in the registry as of February 2017, 659 (65.2%) with severe disease and 351 (34.8%) with attenuated disease (Supplemental Figure 1). Among these registrants, 761 had data from at least one echocardiogram during the natural history period, 496 with severe disease, and 265 with attenuated disease. Demographic characteristics for this cohort are shown in Table 1. The proportion of males and females was similar in both groups. The mean ages at diagnosis and first echocardiogram were younger in the severe group compared to the attenuated group. Those with severe disease had less natural history follow-up time, with a median of 1.4 years versus 10.3 years for the attenuated group. The majority of individuals with echocardiograms were from Europe/Middle East/Africa (n = 369, 48.5%) or North America (n = 323, 42.4%), and the remainder were from South America (n = 62, 8.1 %) or Asia (n = 7, 0.9 %).

Table 1. Characteristics of MPS I Registry participants with at least one echocardiograph during the natural history period

IQR = interquartile range; MPS I = mucopolysaccharidosis type I; SD standard deviation.

*Natural history follow-up time was calculated from birth to last known follow-up date for treatment-naïve individuals. For individuals who received enzyme replacement therapy or had hematopoietic stem cell transplant, natural history follow-up time was calculated from birth to date of first treatment. Echocardiograph report included LVPWd, IVSd, LVed, LVes, and shortening fraction.

Among 761 participants, there were 4444 echocardiography reports, 3119 (70.2%) among the severe group and 1325 (30%) among the attenuated group. The median number of reports per individual was greater for the severe group (5, range 1–42) than for the attenuated group (3, range 1–36). Most reports were from 1990 or later (n = 4306/4444, 97%).

Valve dysfunction

Among 760 individuals with at least one response to the valve dysfunction question, 160 (21.1%) never reported valve dysfunction (n = 128/496, 25.8% with severe disease and n = 32/264, 12.1% with attenuated disease). Among the 600 individuals who ever reported valve dysfunction, most had a “yes” response at their first valve function assessment (n = 319/368, 86.7%, severe and n = 199/232, 85.8%, attenuated). Median (25th, 75th percentile) ages at the first report of valve dysfunction were 1.2 (0.8, 2.1) and 7.5 (4.5, 14.9) years for the severe and attenuated groups, respectively. When “no” was the response to the presence of valve dysfunction, median (25th, 75th percentile) ages were younger: 1.0 (0.6, 1.6) and 4.9 (2, 10) for the severe and attenuated groups, respectively. Natural history follow-up was 1.4 (1.0, 2.6) and 10.3 (5.4, 18.4) years for the severe and attenuated groups, respectively.

Specific valve dysfunction by disease phenotype is shown in Table 2. Percent of individuals with valve dysfunction is shown in Figure 1A (stenosis) and 1B (regurgitation). Apart from tricuspid regurgitation, which occurred in greater than 30% of individuals, left-sided valve disease was more common than right-sided valve disease in both the severe and attenuated groups. By contrast, right-sided valve findings (apart from tricuspid regurgitation) occurred in less than 15% of participants and were not significantly different between the severe and attenuated phenotypes.

Figure 1. Valve dysfunction and ventricular dimension and function in severe and attenuated MPS I. A. Percent of individuals with valve regurgitation. B. Percent of individuals with valve stenosis. C. Median age (years) of first report of valve regurgitation. D. Median age of the first report of valve stenosis. E. Percent of individuals with abnormal (Z-scores ≥2) for left ventricular posterior wall (LVPWd) or intraventricular septal (IVSd) thicknesses in diastole by age group. F. Percent of individuals with abnormal (Z-scores ≥2) for left ventricular end-diastolic (LVed) and end-systolic (LVes) dimensions by age group. G. Percent of individuals with decreased shortening fraction (<28%) by age group. For data in panels A–D: The denominator used for each group is the total number of individuals with any (yes or no) valve dysfunction data. For data in panels E–G: An individual may have had reports from multiple exams at different ages. Numbers in the table below the bar graphs are the numbers of individuals with abnormal results over the number of individuals with available data.

Table 2. Echocardiographic description of valve dysfunction among individuals with severe or attenuated MPS I during the natural history period

Age at presentation of valve dysfunction was significantly higher in individuals with attenuated disease compared to severe disease (Table 2, Fig. 1C-D). Mitral regurgitation was the most common and earliest finding for individuals with both severe (58.3%, median age 1.2 years) and attenuated (74.2%, median age 8.0 years) disease. Mitral regurgitation occurred twofold more frequently than the next most common finding, aortic regurgitation, in both the severe (20.4%) and attenuated (33.0%) phenotypes.

The most notable difference in valve dysfunction between severe and attenuated phenotypes was the development of mitral and aortic stenosis in individuals with attenuated disease. Mitral stenosis occurred in only 9.1% of severely affected individuals, compared to 30.3% of those with attenuated disease. Similarly, aortic stenosis occurred in only 3.6% of individuals with the severe phenotype but in 25.0% of those with attenuated disease. Except for mitral prolapse, left-sided valve abnormalities were significantly more frequent in individuals with the attenuated phenotype (p ≤ 0.0001 for each type).

Ventricular dimension and function

Table 2 includes ventricular dimension and function data overall and with data restricted to assessments done prior to or at the time of diagnosis. Prevalence of increased (i.e., Z-scores ≥2) posterior wall and septal thickness and ventricular chamber dimensions and decreased shortening fraction (i.e., <28%) was higher in those with severe versus attenuated disease. Left ventricular hypertrophy of the posterior wall was the most common finding in both phenotypes (47.7 and 31% in severe and attenuated, respectively). Increased left ventricular chamber dimensions in diastole and systole and septal thickness were reported in approximately 1/3 of individuals with severe disease compared to 8–16% of those with the attenuated phenotype (Table 2). Among the small proportion (<20%) of individuals with dimension data available before or at the time of diagnosis, 24–37% of those with severe disease and 9–20% of those with attenuated disease had abnormal cardiac dimension results.

Figure 1E and F show the distribution of abnormal ventricular dimensions and function by age groups for each phenotype. Abnormalities in ventricular wall and septal thickness were observed early and generally occurred with similar frequency across age groups in the severe phenotype, although there were few individuals older than 5 years of age for comparison (Fig. 1E). Abnormal diastolic and systolic dimension Z-scores occurred with the greatest frequency in individuals less than 6 months of age (Fig. 1F). Among individuals with attenuated disease, chamber wall thickness and dimension abnormalities were most frequent in those less than 5 years and greater than 20 years of age (Fig. 1E and F).

Decreased cardiac systolic function (shortening fractions <28%) occurred in less than 20% of individuals with either phenotype (16.1% and 6.7% with severe and attenuated phenotypes, respectively) (Table 3) and occurred with the greatest frequency (27.3%, n = 12/44) among individuals with severe disease who were 6 months of age or younger (Fig. 1G).

Table 3. Echocardiographic description of ventricular dimensions and function during the natural history period

IVSd = intraventricular septal thickness in diastole, IQR = interquartile range, LVed = left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LVes = left ventricular end-systolic dimension, LVPWd = left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole, MPS I = mucopolysaccharidosis type I, SD = standard deviation.

*Chi-square test and non-parametric Wilcoxon tests were used to calculate p-values of percentage of valve dysfunction and age at first reported valve dysfunction, respectively, between severe and attenuated MPS I groups. The percentages were based on individuals with a usable response to the valve dysfunction (yes/no). Those with unknown or missing responses were excluded.

**Percent determined using number of individuals with any data before or at MPS I diagnosis as denominator

Mixed model analysis was used to assess changes in Z-scores over time. Figure 2A and B show estimated changes in Z-scores over time for left ventricular posterior wall thickness and interventricular septal thickness, respectively. Left ventricular posterior wall Z-scores increased significantly with time in the severe phenotype (estimated slope 0.2777 units/year, p value = 0.037) while remaining stable in the attenuated phenotype (estimated slope −0.0401 units/year, p = 0.069). The difference between slopes in the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.019). Results were similar for interventricular septal thickness (estimated slopes 0.3831 and −0.0029 units/year for the severe and attenuated phenotypes, respectively, p-value for difference by phenotype = 0.001).

Figure 2. Estimated changes in chamber dimensions Z-scores and shortening fraction over time for individuals with severe and attenuated MPS I from mixed model analyses of patients with ≥2 echocardiogram measurements over time. The red and blue solid lines represent the estimated slopes for each parameter over time for the severe and attenuated groups, respectively. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence bands. Legends below the figures include the number of individuals in each group, p-values for whether the slope is significantly different from 0, and the p-value for interaction indicating whether the slopes are different between the two groups. A. Z-scores for left ventricular posterior wall thicknesses in diastole. B. Z-scores for intraventricular septal thicknesses in diastole. C. Z-scores for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension. D. Z-scores for left ventricular end-systolic dimension. E. Shortening fraction.

In contrast, estimated left ventricular chamber dimension Z-scores in both systole (Fig. 2C) and diastole (Fig. 2D) significantly decreased over time in the severe, but not the attenuated, phenotype, and the difference in slopes between the two groups was significant for both measurements (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Finally, mixed model analysis showed that shortening fractions were within normal limits over time (Fig. 2E) and increased (improved) over time in the severe phenotype while remaining unchanged in the attenuated phenotype (p-value for the difference by phenotype = 0.002).

Discussion

Cardiac abnormalities are common findings in individuals with mucopolysaccharidosis type I, but to date, the natural history of untreated cardiac features of the disease has not been well described, with reports limited to small numbers of patients, single institutions, or specific age groups or phenotypes. The data provided herein represent the largest natural history assessment of the cardiac features of untreated mucopolysaccharidosis type I from individuals of all age ranges and phenotypes gathered from sites throughout the globe. As such, it confirms some suspected findings of earlier, smaller studies and presents new and important information that may provide a useful benchmark with which to evaluate new therapies for the disease.

This study confirms that cardiac valve disease, particularly left-sided, is an early and common manifestation of both severe and attenuated disease and, though often presenting a decade earlier in the severe phenotype, is more prevalent in the attenuated phenotype. Mitral regurgitation and aortic regurgitation are the most frequently reported left-sided valve abnormalities in both severe and attenuated phenotypes and occur earlier than valve stenosis. Left-sided valve stenosis, by contrast, is more common in the older attenuated phenotype and seems to be confirmed by studies that show that valve replacement for attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis is performed almost universally for valve stenosis. Reference Braunlin and Wang43 While the reason for this finding remains unclear, the contribution of ongoing valvular inflammation leading to fibrosis, and hence stenosis, such as is seen in chronic versus acute rheumatic mitral disease may provide some insight into the mechanism. Reference Guadalajara, Laplaza, Torres Tono, Vera Delgado, Gual Juliá and Huerta44

Right-sided valve dysfunction is much less common in both severe and attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis, except for tricuspid regurgitation. While the frequency of tricuspid valve regurgitation was high in both groups, the severity of regurgitation is not known in this study. Trivial regurgitation is present in many young individuals in the general population without clinical consequence. Reference Webb, Gentles, Stirling, Lee, O'Donnell and Wilson45,Reference Zoghbi, Adams and Bonow46

Significant abnormalities of left ventricular dimension were more common in individuals with severe compared to attenuated disease. Hypertrophy of the left ventricular posterior wall and abnormal left ventricular end-diastolic dimension were the most frequent findings in both phenotypes, especially among younger individuals. For the small number of individuals with data prior to mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis, posterior wall hypertrophy was present before diagnosis in 29% of these individuals. Hypertrophy of the posterior wall, rather than the interventricular septum, is unique to our study, as hypertrophy of the septum has previously been reported in other studies. Reference Dangel18,Reference Leal, de Paula, Leone and Kim25 Significantly smaller left ventricular chamber size has been reported in mucopolysaccharidosis type IV, Reference Kampmann, Abu-Tair and Gokce47 as was found in the individuals with severe mucopolysaccharidosis type I in our study and may be explained by the inward direction of hypertrophy resulting in decreased chamber diameters. Over time, little change in either left ventricular posterior wall hypertrophy or ventricular dimensions occurred in the attenuated phenotype. By contrast, among individuals with severe disease, posterior wall and septal thickness progressed while end-diastolic and -systolic dimensions decreased. Progressive hypertrophy may result from continued cardiac glycosaminoglycan accumulation that, in turn, results in diastolic dysfunction, a faster heart rate, and a smaller left ventricular dimension. For the severe phenotype, with little to no active alpha-L-iduronidase enzyme, this accumulation may occur more rapidly than in the attenuated phenotype, where enzyme levels may be higher. It is also feasible that septal hypertrophy may be overestimated in those with the severe phenotype, since these individuals are most often of short stature Reference Viskochil, Clarke, Bay, Keenan, Muenzer and Guffon48 and therefore have a lower body surface area for their age. Since the heart grows physiologically during childhood, the lower body surface area may overestimate hypertrophy.

Decreased cardiac left ventricular function (shortening fraction <28%) was uncommon but was observed more often in individuals with the severe compared to the attenuated phenotype. The highest percentage of decreased ventricular function occurred in the youngest group of individuals with severe disease (those <6 months of age). Decreased cardiac function in young infants has previously been reported in both mucopolysaccharidosis type I Reference Wiseman, Mercer and Tylee39,Reference Honjo, Vaca and Leal49,Reference Demirsoy, Gucuyener, Olgunturk, Tunaoglu and Oguz50 and mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (Maroteaux-Lamy). Reference Miller and Partridge51 In the era of newborn screening, decreased cardiac systolic function is of clinical importance. When averaged over all age groups, cardiac function remained within normal limits over time for both phenotypes, although statistically, shortening fraction improved over time for individuals with the severe phenotype but remained unchanged for those with attenuated disease.

The limitations of this study include the voluntary nature of registry data for which the frequency and type of assessments according to standard of care may be performed at irregular intervals. Echocardiographic data are submitted from institutions using different equipment, adhering to differing protocols, and with varying degrees of experience in performing and interpreting echocardiography from those with mucopolysaccharidosis. Inter-observer variability may result in significant errors, especially in the measurement of cardiac function and amount of valvular regurgitation. Reference Lipshultz, Easley and Orav52,Reference Frommelt, Minich and Trachtenberg53 Due to the subjective nature of reporting cardiac valve regurgitation, only the presence or absence of the finding was included in this report. In addition, left ventricular function was assessed by shortening fraction rather than a volumetric quantification. The measurement of ejection fraction in infants and young children with mucopolysaccharidosis is challenging due to poor acoustic windows and lack of cooperation. As the data were retrospective and voluntary, we could not require ejection fraction (or sedation) to submit data. Although this measurement could strengthen the findings of this manuscript, these data were not consistently available to us, in part because the registry predates these recommendations by more than a decade. For the same reasons, measurements of Z-scores based on age, sex, race, and ethnicity, which may contribute to small differences in the data, Reference Lopez, Colan and Stylianou54 were not made. Cardiac data elements did not include other components of more recent interest such as aortic dimensions, aortic root dilation, strain, and diastolic function.

While there is less than a 4% transcription error of submitted data into the registry, Reference Verhulst, Artiles-Carloni and Beck55 there is variability in data capture (e.g., use of handwritten notes versus full reports) and inability to assess how echocardiography was performed (i.e., according to current recommendations for standardisation of measurements). It is important to note that a challenge of performing echocardiograms in this population is the bony abnormalities of the sternum and ribs, which may yield inaccurate measurements for some individuals with severe disease. For example, 26% of respondents with severe disease had no valve dysfunction ever reported. Potential explanations for this finding include that individuals without valve dysfunction were younger than the overall group and had fewer echocardiographs, that valve findings were subtle or not investigated, or a combination of the above factors. The integrity of the data is supported by the finding that those who reported “yes” for valve dysfunction were older than those who reported “no” when the age of the first valve dysfunction was recorded, a finding compatible with the progressive nature of glycosaminoglycan storage in this disease. Finally, despite the large number of enrollees, some estimates of changes in parameters over time were based on a small number of data points. Any measurement error, either by echocardiography or by measurement of height and weight, could affect the findings from small numbers of individuals. While rare diseases registry-based data are extremely valuable to assess disease natural history and the impact of treatment, improvements in data capture, for example availability of actual echocardiographic imaging studies, will significantly aid in the interpretation of results.

With the availability of enzyme replacement therapy for attenuated disease and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe disease in very young children, Reference Martins, Dualibi and Norato6,Reference de Ru, Boelens and Das7 determining the natural history of untreated mucopolysaccharidosis has become unfeasible. The Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry provides the opportunity to analyse the largest set of global longitudinal cardiac data available for individuals during treatment-naïve periods. Since most echocardiographs were obtained when colour Doppler was widely available, these Registry data likely provide an accurate assessment of the prevalence of valve dysfunction among treatment-naïve individuals.

Conclusions

Interrogation of echocardiograph data from a large international voluntary registry of individuals with mucopolysaccharidosis type I who are treatment-naïve has shown that left-sided cardiac valve disease is common. Mitral regurgitation is the most common valve dysfunction for severe and attenuated phenotypes, but left-sided valve stenosis is more common in those with attenuated disease. Hypertrophy of the left ventricular posterior wall develops early and progresses within the severe phenotype but remains stable in the attenuated phenotype. Decreased cardiac function, while uncommon, occurs in 25% of infants less than 6 months of age with the severe phenotype and is of clinical importance. Understanding the natural history of cardiac abnormalities will hopefully be useful for the clinical assessment of people living with mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951123003347

Acknowledgements

Kristin Moy, PhD, contributed to feasibility analyses while an employee of Sanofi. Patrice C. Ferriola, PhD, of KZE PharmAssociates assisted with manuscript editing and preparation and, the study was funded by Sanofi.

Financial support

Sanofi provided financial support for the study, including support for manuscript editing.

Competing interests

Elizabeth Braunlin declares no competing interests.

Lorne A Clarke was a member of the International MPS I Registry advisory board and recipient of speaker’s fees for educational events related to lysosomal disease from Sanofi.

Luisa Bay was a member of the International MPS I Registry advisory board and recipient of honoraria, consulting fees, and travel reimbursement from Sanofi.

Nathalie Guffon was a member of the International MPS I Registry advisory board and recipient of honoraria and travel reimbursement from Sanofi.

Nicolas Pangaud declares no competing interests.

Meng Yang was employed by Sanofi at the time of the study.

Ethical standard

Written consent was required of all participants prior to enrolment in the registry. As of December 2012, each participating site has been required to have approval from an institutional review board or ethics committee for registry participation.

References

Muenzer, J. Overview of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 50: 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D, Connock, MJ, Wraith, E, Lavery, C. The prevalence of and survival in Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Hurler, Hurler-Scheie and Scheie syndromes in the UK. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2008; 3: 2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, M, Arn, P, Giugliani, R, et al. The natural history of MPS I: global perspectives from the MPS I Registry. Genet Med 2014; 16: 759765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muenzer, J, Wraith, JE, Clarke, LA. Mucopolysaccharidosis I: management and treatment guidelines. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giugliani, R, Federhen, A, Rojas, MV, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis I, II, and VI: brief review and guidelines for treatment. Genet Mol Biol 2011; 33: 589604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, AM, Dualibi, AP, Norato, D, et al. Guidelines for the management of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. J Pediatr 2009; 155: S32S46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ru, MH, Boelens, JJ, Das, AM, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at diagnosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of a European consensus procedure. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011; 6: 5562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kubaski, F, de Oliveira Poswar, F, Michelin-Tirelli, K, et al. Diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidoses. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10: 172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, LA, Atherton, AM, Burton, BK, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I newborn screening: best practices for diagnosis and management. J Pediatr 2017; 182: 363370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pastores, GM, Arn, P, Beck, M, et al. The MPS I registry: design, methodology, and early findings of a global disease registry for monitoring patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Mol Genet Metab 2007; 91: 3747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunlin, EA, Harmatz, PR, Scarpa, M, et al. Cardiac disease in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis: presentation, diagnosis and management. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011; 34: 11831197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolourchi, M, Renella, P, Wang, RY. Aortic root dilatation in mucopolysaccharidosis I-VII. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17: 2004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunlin, EA, Stauffer, NR, Peters, CH, et al. Usefulness of bone marrow transplantation in the Hurler syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 882886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunlin, EA, Berry, JM, Whitley, CB. Cardiac findings after enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis type I. The Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 416418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lum, SH, Stepien, KM, Ghosh, A, et al. Long term survival and cardiopulmonary outcome in children with Hurler syndrome after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Inherit Metab Dis 2017; 40: 455460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sifuentes, M, Doroshow, R, Hoft, R, et al. A follow-up study of MPS I patients treated with laronidase enzyme replacement therapy for 6 years. Mol Genet Metab 2007; 90: 171180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wippermann, CF, Beck, M, Schranz, D, Huth, R, Michel-Behnke, I, Jungst, BK. Mitral and aortic regurgitation in 84 patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Eur J Pediatr 1995; 154: 98101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dangel, JH. Cardiovascular changes in children with mucopolysaccharide storage diseases and related disorders--clinical and echocardiographic findings in 64 patients. Eur J Pediatr 1998; 157: 534538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renteria, VG, Ferrans, VJ, Roberts, WC. The heart in the Hurler syndrome: gross, histologic and ultrastructural observations in five necropsy cases. Am J Cardiol 1976; 38: 487501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fesslova, V, Corti, P, Sersale, G, et al. The natural course and the impact of therapies of cardiac involvement in the mucopolysaccharidoses. Cardiol Young 2009; 19: 170178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, HY, Chuang, CK, Chen, MR, et al. Natural history and clinical assessment of Taiwanese patients with mucopolysaccharidosis IVA. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014; 9: 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, HY, Chuang, CK, Chen, MR, et al. Cardiac structure and function and effects of enzyme replacement therapy in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses I, II, IVA and VI. Mol Genet Metab 2016; 117: 431437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soliman, OI, Timmermans, RG, Nemes, A, et al. Cardiac abnormalities in adults with the attenuated form of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. J Inherit Metab Dis 2007; 30: 750757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brands, MM, Frohn-Mulder, IM, Hagemans, ML, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis: cardiologic features and effects of enzyme-replacement therapy in 24 children with MPS I, II and VI. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013; 36: 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, GN, de Paula, AC, Leone, C, Kim, CA. Echocardiographic study of paediatric patients with mucopolysaccharidosis. Cardiol Young 2010; 20: 254261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieken, RM, Kerber, RE, Ionasescu, VV, Zellweger, H. Cardiac manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Circulation 1975; 52: 700705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, MFA, Guimaraes, ICB, Acosta, AX, Leao, EKEA, Moreira, MIG, Mendes, CMC. Left ventricular assessment in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis using conventional echocardiography and myocardial deformation by two-dimensional speckle-tracking method. J Pediatr 2019; 95: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigante, D, Segni, G. Cardiac structural involvement in mucopolysaccharidoses. Cardiology 2002; 98: 1820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugiura, K, Kubo, T, Ochi, Y, et al. Cardiac manifestations and effects of enzyme replacement therapy for over 10 years in adults with the attenuated form of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Mol Genet Metab Rep 2020; 25: 100662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadeghian, H, Sadeghian, A, Eslami, B, Abbasi, SH, Lotfi-Tokaldany, M. Combined aortic and mitral valve stenosis in mucopolysaccharidosis syndrome type I-S: a report of a rare case. J Tehran Heart Cent 2021; 16: 3133.Google Scholar
Poswar, FO, Santos, HS, Santos, ABS, et al. Progression of cardiovascular manifestations in adults and children with mucopolysaccharidoses with and without enzyme replacement therapy. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8: 801147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiely, BT, Kohler, JL, Coletti, HY, Poe, MD, Escolar, ML. Early disease progression of Hurler syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12: 32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, L, Orchard, P, Whitley, CB, et al. Cardiac ultrasound findings in infants with severe (Hurler phenotype) untreated mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) type I. JIMD Rep 2013; 10: 8794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, JA, Beck, M, Clarke, JT, Cox, GF. Childhood onset of Scheie syndrome, the attenuated form of mucopolysaccharidosis I. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010; 33: 421427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vijay, S, Wraith, JE. Clinical presentation and follow-up of patients with the attenuated phenotype of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norway: 1992) 2005; 94: 872877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poswar, FO, de Souza, CFM, Giugliani, R, Baldo, G. Aortic root dilatation in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses and the impact of enzyme replacement therapy. Heart Vessels 2019; 34: 290295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galzerano, D, Saba, S, Al Sergani, A, et al. Features and behavior of valvular abnormalities in adolescent and adult patients in mucopolysaccharidosis: an echocardiographic study. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2021; 91: 1767.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirth, A, Berg, A, Greve, G. Successful treatment of severe heart failure in an infant with Hurler syndrome. J Inherit Metab Dis 2007; 30: 820820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, DH, Mercer, J, Tylee, K, et al. Management of mucopolysaccharidosis type IH (Hurler’s syndrome) presenting in infancy with severe dilated cardiomyopathy: a single institution’s experience. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013; 36: 263270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braunlin, E, Miettunen, K, Lund, T, Luquette, M, Orchard, P. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe MPS I in the first six months of life: the heart of the matter. Mol Genet Metab 2019; 126: 117120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laraway, S, Mercer, J, Jameson, E, Ashworth, J, Hensman, P, Jones, SA. Outcomes of long-term treatment with laronidase in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I. J Pediatr 2016; 178: 219226.e211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersen, MD, Du, W, Skeens, ME, Humes, RA. Regression equations for calculation of z scores of cardiac structures in a large cohort of healthy infants, children, and adolescents: an echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 922934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunlin, E, Wang, R. Cardiac issues in adults with the mucopolysaccharidoses: current knowledge and emerging needs. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2016; 102: 12571262.Google ScholarPubMed
Guadalajara, JF, Laplaza, I, Torres Tono, A, Vera Delgado, A, Gual Juliá, JM, Huerta, D. [Natural history of rheumatic carditis. A follow-up of more than 20 years]. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1989; 59: 6368.Google Scholar
Webb, RH, Gentles, TL, Stirling, JW, Lee, M, O'Donnell, C, Wilson, NJ. Valvular regurgitation using portable echocardiography in a healthy student population: implications for rheumatic heart disease screening. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28: 981988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoghbi, WA, Adams, D, Bonow, RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017; 30: 303371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kampmann, C, Abu-Tair, T, Gokce, S, et al. Heart and cardiovascular involvement in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA (Morquio-A Syndrome). PLoS One 2016; 11: e0162612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viskochil, D, Clarke, LA, Bay, L, Keenan, H, Muenzer, J, Guffon, N. Growth patterns for untreated individuals with MPS I: report from the international MPS I registry. Am J Med Genet A 2019; 179: 24252432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honjo, RS, Vaca, ECN, Leal, GN, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI: case report with first neonatal presentation with ascites fetalis and rapidly progressive cardiac manifestation. BMC Med Genet 2020; 21: 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demirsoy, S, Gucuyener, K, Olgunturk, R, Tunaoglu, S, Oguz, D. A case of mucopolysaccharidoses type I with heart involvement during infancy. Turk J Pediatr 1990; 32: 4952.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, G, Partridge, A. Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI presenting in infancy with endocardial fibroelastosis and heart failure. Pediatr Cardiol 1983; 4: 6162.Google ScholarPubMed
Lipshultz, SE, Easley, KA, Orav, EJ, et al. Reliability of multicenter pediatric echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular structure and function: the prospective P(2)C(2) HIV study. Circulation 2001; 104: 310316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frommelt, PC, Minich, LL, Trachtenberg, FL, et al. Challenges with left ventricular functional parameters: the pediatric heart network normal echocardiogram database. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019; 32: 13311338 e1331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, L, Colan, S, Stylianou, M, et al. Relationship of echocardiographic Z scores adjusted for body surface area to age, sex, race, and ethnicity: the pediatric heart network normal echocardiogram database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017; 10: e006979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhulst, K, Artiles-Carloni, L, Beck, M, et al. Source document verification in the Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012; 21: 749752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of MPS I Registry participants with at least one echocardiograph during the natural history period

Figure 1

Figure 1. Valve dysfunction and ventricular dimension and function in severe and attenuated MPS I. A. Percent of individuals with valve regurgitation. B. Percent of individuals with valve stenosis. C. Median age (years) of first report of valve regurgitation. D. Median age of the first report of valve stenosis. E. Percent of individuals with abnormal (Z-scores ≥2) for left ventricular posterior wall (LVPWd) or intraventricular septal (IVSd) thicknesses in diastole by age group. F. Percent of individuals with abnormal (Z-scores ≥2) for left ventricular end-diastolic (LVed) and end-systolic (LVes) dimensions by age group. G. Percent of individuals with decreased shortening fraction (<28%) by age group. For data in panels A–D: The denominator used for each group is the total number of individuals with any (yes or no) valve dysfunction data. For data in panels E–G: An individual may have had reports from multiple exams at different ages. Numbers in the table below the bar graphs are the numbers of individuals with abnormal results over the number of individuals with available data.

Figure 2

Table 2. Echocardiographic description of valve dysfunction among individuals with severe or attenuated MPS I during the natural history period

Figure 3

Table 3. Echocardiographic description of ventricular dimensions and function during the natural history period

Figure 4

Figure 2. Estimated changes in chamber dimensions Z-scores and shortening fraction over time for individuals with severe and attenuated MPS I from mixed model analyses of patients with ≥2 echocardiogram measurements over time. The red and blue solid lines represent the estimated slopes for each parameter over time for the severe and attenuated groups, respectively. Shaded areas represent the 95% confidence bands. Legends below the figures include the number of individuals in each group, p-values for whether the slope is significantly different from 0, and the p-value for interaction indicating whether the slopes are different between the two groups. A. Z-scores for left ventricular posterior wall thicknesses in diastole. B. Z-scores for intraventricular septal thicknesses in diastole. C. Z-scores for left ventricular end-diastolic dimension. D. Z-scores for left ventricular end-systolic dimension. E. Shortening fraction.

Supplementary material: File

Braunlin et al. supplementary material

Braunlin et al. supplementary material
Download Braunlin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 27.6 KB