Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:34:26.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Happy times, careers and happenstance in UK psychiatry: time, timeliness, timelessness, eternity and contemporality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2024

George Ikkos*
Affiliation:
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
Nick Bouras
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
*
Correspondence to George Ikkos ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To address some challenges facing psychiatrists today we discuss issues of happenstance and fulfilment in psychiatric careers through some of the record and reflections of four psychiatrists since the 1950s. We trace the changes in psychiatry attendant to the transition from the welfare to the neoliberal state and=its contemporary postmodern culture. We highlight the crucial importance of political-cultural as well as technological developments in determining psychiatric service management and provision, and clinical practice and career outcomes. In the light of this impact, in a global era that some highly respected authorities consider in apocalyptic terms, we advocate for the incorporation of training in political awareness and activism in the psychiatric curriculum and practice. We suggest that this is necessary for social justice and patient welfare and that it will help safeguard psychiatric professionalism, conscience and self-esteem.

Type
Editorial
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

‘To be contemporary is to create one's time, not to reflect it. Or, to reflect it only not like a mirror but like a shield.’

Marina Tsvetaeva (p. 101)Reference Tsvetaeva and Livingstone1

In a linked paper PooleReference Poole2 invites us to reflect on career and happenstance in the life of Bertram Mandelbrote (1923–2010).Reference Millard, Agulnik, Armstrong, Fees, Hall and Kennard3 Mandelbrote, a man of intelligence, integrity, initiative and intent, arrived as a Rhodes Scholar from South Africa in 1946 to study at the University of Oxford, where he researched Wilson's disease before training in psychiatry at the Maudsley Hospital in London. He was appointed Physician Superintendent at Coney Hill and Horton Hospitals in 1956, then Littlemore Hospital Oxford in 1959. Brittons ‘have never had it so good’ proclaimed in 1957 Prime Minister Harold McMillan (1894–1986). By retirement in 1988 Mandelbrote had pioneered locally the therapeutic community approach and overseen developments in psychiatric deinstitutionalisation and social rehabilitation, drug and alcohol rehabilitation, and new accessible counselling and psychotherapy services. A fulfilling record.

Psychiatry 1950–1990: from the welfare to the neoliberal state

Martin Deahl, also a man of intelligence, integrity, initiative and intent, tells a different story, his own.Reference Deahl4 He was appointed a consultant psychiatrist in 1990. Although this was in the vicinity of Tower Hamlets in East London, one of the poorest boroughs in the European Union at the time, i.e. different from Oxford, the two colleagues would have found things in common in their respective workplaces. Today, Deahl laments that training and services have fragmented, the imperatives of regulations have mandated spending hours before the computer rather than patients, continuity of care has been shattered and families burdened further. Time has gone by but has also fled from the consultation room. What separates Mandelbrote's and Deahl's career outcomes? Different times? Happenstance, in Poole's terms?

Mandelbrote was appointed Superintendent during the high tide of psychopharmacology in the 1950s and by the time he moved to work in Oxford the new liberal Mental Health Act 1959 had gained parliamentary ascent. He also had the ear of Enoch Powell (1912–1998), a highly controversial but able right-wing politician whose record as Minister of Health from 1960 to 1962 was better than most.Reference Timmins5 A free marketeer, Powell's previous experience as junior minister at the Treasury enabled him to secure funding for the National Hospital Plan 1962, which created Britain's district general hospital (DGH) network. His libertarian views motivated advocacy for the closure of the crumbling and illiberal mental hospital network, savings from which would fund the DGHs. Consequently, psychiatric patients would now be treated in the community and DGHs. These were the services that Deahl and contemporary consultants were appointed into.

The working lives of Mandelbrote and Deahl share the decade of the 1980s, a period of great social strife in Britain, a key aspect of which was documented in the recent Channel 4 TV series ‘The Miners’ Strike 1984: The Battle for Britain’ (2024). Its outcome changed Britain decisively. Mandelbrote was appointed Superintendent during the post-war Welfare State consensus but the significance of the 1980s is that by 1990 Britain had become neoliberal. Things took a fateful turn with the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, surely a deliberate misnomer by a Conservative government (1979–1990) led by Margaret Thatcher (1925–2013), who was viscerally hostile to the NHS and had infamously been quoted as saying ‘there is no such thing as society’. Dr Mandelbrote's appointment was ‘timely’, Dr Deahl's not, if we may put it this way.

Psychiatric services do some good but by the time we finished editing Mind, State and Society Reference Ikkos and Bouras6 we had a strong sense that they were better set up to meet the needs of venture capital than patients. The Swinging Sixties notwithstanding, with the empire gone and high consumer consumption, Britain has struggled since that decade with balance of payments deficits and debt, which became worse with the 1973 oil crisis. The importance of neoliberalism as a response to such challenges includes that it significantly handed over national governance and control to international finance.Reference Edgerton7 It is a timeless truth that he who pays the piper calls the tune. In former Prime Minister Theresa May's memorable phrase, this now became the ‘citizens of nowhere’. Their priority has never been the welfare of the most vulnerable but the minimum possible welfare provision to maintain the efficiency and legitimacy of earnings from capital investment.Reference Wallerstein8

Psychiatry 1990–2020: neoliberalism and the postmodern condition

As contemporary of Poole and Deahl, G.I. can add his reminiscences to theirs. He was invited in 2007 to become Medical Director of his mental health trust. Although he had been Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ London Division for 5 years, where he had actively advocated psychiatrists’ engagement in medical management, and was continuing as its Honorary Treasurer, he was shocked when he met the trust's Interim Chief Executive, who presented a strategic plan concocted by one of the big corporate consulting companies. It had nothing to do with how he had been trained, nor with what made professional sense and, after much agonising, withdrew his application. It was a grave error of the New Labour government (1997–2010), an act of political-administrative vandalism, that although they invested in services, securing a 45% increase in consultant psychiatrist numbers between 1999 and 2004,Reference Harrison9 they turned to American business management practices. Rather than build organically as Poole summarises, they developed governance systems that favoured financial (ac)counting over clinical accountability.Reference John-Smith, McQueen, Michael, Ikkos, Denman and Maier10

Beware oversimplification! The 1960s–1970s were not ‘happy times’Reference Hide, Ikkos and Bouras11Reference Tyrer, Ikkos and Bouras13 and there have been some improvements since.Reference Glasby, Tew, Fenton, Ikkos and Bouras14,Reference Farmer, Blackshaw, Ikkos and Bouras15 Had psychiatry matched the impressive biomedical advances of other medical specialties, often based on technology, it might have turned out different, but this was always improbable. Additionally, declining local fertility rates, growing inbound migration and increasing longevity have changed the composition and nature of our communities. Furthermore, computing and digitalisation brought about ‘neo-communities’Reference Reckwitz and Pakis16 and other massive unforeseen changes. We have argued elsewhere that commencing in the 1990s they seeded the beginnings of a new era beyond community psychiatry, the era of metacommunity psychiatry.Reference Bouras, Ikkos and Craig17 In Greek, meta means after, i.e. after community. One can debate when it started but now, post COVID-19 and in the Age of AI,Reference Ikkos and Bouras18 it has arrived. All that Deahl laments is a key aspect of it and truly it is an eternity away from Mandelbrote's era.

Mandelbrote carried the aura and authority of the Physician Superintendent over to the community, perhaps its menace too. These have expired with the phantasmagoria of financial capitalism, globalisation, technology, big data, and commodification of knowledge and health, i.e. the whole panoply of postmodernism. Perhaps had more psychiatrists read when it was first published in 1979 Jean Francois Lyotard's admirably lucid La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport sur le Savoir’,Reference Lyotard, Bennington and Massoumi19 we might have been better prepared. Key themes included numbers dominating over narratives, and the commodification of knowledge, corporatisation of health services and demoralisation of the professions. And had we withstood Fredric Jameson's exuberantly verbose Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism Reference Jameson20 we might have anticipated postmodernism's ‘attenuation of affect’ and the bureaucracy associated with it. At its grotesque extreme, this would demand that psychologists and psychiatrists become the administrators of misery and madness in the neoliberal state rather than enlightened professional healers.

Psychiatry today: metacommunity and politics

Ultimately, we must face our contemporality. Those will fare best and contribute most who grasp and address current realities: evidence, modern management techniques, big data, understanding influence, teaching: all this firmly tethered to clinical ethics and wisdom. Beyond ‘leadership’, we must also grasp the grand Politics, which glaringly determines our practice, in order both to be prepared for it and speak out about today's political economy, which increases rates of common and other mental health problems,Reference Armitage, Kwong, Tseliou, Sellers, Blakey and Anthony21 dehumanises services and delivers second-best services to those with more severe conditions.Reference Fiorillo and Sartorius22 To voice concerns effectively in the public sphere, locally and beyond, this broader political know-how about ideology and power, including how they affect health and public administration, needs to be part of both our professional formation and continuing development. We are not entirely at the mercy of happenstance but have a part in shaping it. Our tough and more complex times notwithstanding, Mandelbrote's story suggests that much can be achieved with low tones, clear thinking, presence, a can-do attitude, loyalty and the informal knack for engaging and trusting galvanised colleagues. For these to happen, however, we must be effectively supported by the state and civil society.Reference Bhugra, Malik and Ikkos23 After all, psychiatry is a profession, even a vocation, but not a sacrifice.

Poole's and Deahl's papers are about the soul of the profession.Reference Poole2,Reference Deahl4 But let's not beat about the bush. The difficulties we face are not unique but shared. As distinguished American political scientist Wendy Brown observed in her 2019 Tanner Lectures on Human Values, we urge younger people to ‘Build your resumé, cultivate your networks, find your mate … but also, save for an unaffordable home and unlikely retirement, plan for the end of democracy, and an uninhabitable planet. Most young people are in a mode of pre-apocalyptic survivalism, as are we all to some extent’ (p. 104).Reference Brown24 This reality has political, epidemiological and daily clinical practice implications for psychiatrists, all equally crucial: at mega-, macro- and microlevels. Fulfilment depends on happenstance, but our times, conscience and self-esteem also depend on our response to it.

About the authors

George Ikkos is a consultant psychiatrist in the Department of Liaison Psychiatry at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, and immediate past Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ History of Psychiatry Special Interest Group (HoPSIG), London, UK. Nick Bouras is Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK. The present paper is the fifth in an ongoing dialogue and collaboration between the two authors that was commenced almost 10 years ago to address issues relating to N.B.'s concept of ‘metacommunity psychiatry and mental health’ and the history of psychiatry, and includes joint editorship of Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010, which was runner up in the Association of American Publishers’ PROSE 2022 Awards in the section History of Science, Medicine and Technology (available open access from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781911623793).

Data availability

Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Acknowledgement

We thank John Hall, Visiting Professor of Mental Health, Oxford Brookes University, for his suggestions.

Author contributions

G.I. proposed and authored the first draft of this paper, which was amended through further iteration with N.B.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes

*

BJPsych Bulletin is not responsible for statements made by contributors and material in BJPsych Bulletin does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor-in-Chief or the College.

References

Tsvetaeva, M. The poet and time. In Art in the Light of Conscience: Eight Essays on Poetry (trans. & ed. Livingstone, A). Bloodaxe, 1992.Google Scholar
Poole, R. Social psychiatry in Oxford and the ecological niche, 1959–1988. BJPsych Bull 2024; 48: this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, D, Agulnik, P, Armstrong, N, Fees, C, Hall, J, Kennard, D, et al. Innovation in mental health care: Bertram Mandelbrote, the Phoenix Unit and the therapeutic community approach. Hist Psychiatry 2023; 34: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deahl, M. General psychiatry, still in no-man's land after all these years. Br J Psychiatry 2024; 224: 86–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmins, N. The Five Giants: A Biography of Welfare State (3rd edn): 203–12. William Collins.Google Scholar
Ikkos, G, Bouras, N, eds. Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010. Cambridge University Press, 2021 (open access: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781911623793).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgerton, D. The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth Century History. Penguin, 2019.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. Dutch hegemony in the world economy. In Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy: 3673. University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Harrison, JA. The trouble with NHS psychiatrists. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John-Smith, PS, McQueen, D, Michael, A, Ikkos, G, Denman, C, Maier, M, et al. The trouble with NHS psychiatry in England. Psychiatr Bull 2009; 33: 219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hide, L. Mental hospitals, social exclusion and public scandals. in Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (eds Ikkos, G, Bouras, N): 60–8. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, E. True confessions of a new managerialist. In Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (eds Ikkos, G, Bouras, N): 111–7. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrer, P. Ken Clarke in conversation with Peter Tyrer: my role in justice and health. In Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (eds Ikkos, G, Bouras, N): 8492. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasby, J, Tew, J, Fenton, S-J. UK mental health policy and practice. In Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (eds Ikkos, G, Bouras, N): 93102. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, P, Blackshaw, E. How the voice of people with mental health problems, families and the voluntary sector changed the landscape. In Mind, State and Society: Social History of Psychiatry and Mental Health in Britain 1960–2010 (eds Ikkos, G, Bouras, N): 128–36. Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. The rise of cultural essentialism. In The Society of Singularities (trans. Pakis, V.A.): 286309. Polity, 2019.Google Scholar
Bouras, N, Ikkos, G, Craig, T. From community to meta-community mental health care. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(4): 806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikkos, G, Bouras, N. Metacommunity: the current status of psychiatry and mental health care. BJPsych Int [Epub ahead of print] 16 May 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2024.15.2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J-F. La Condition Postmoderne: Rapport sur le Savoir. Minuit, 1979. Reprinted as The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans. Bennington, G, Massoumi, B). Manchester University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. The cultural logic of late capitalism. In Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism: 154. Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Armitage, JM, Kwong, ASF, Tseliou, F, Sellers, R, Blakey, R, Anthony, R, et al. Cross-cohort change in parent-reported emotional problem trajectories across childhood and adolescence in the UK. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10: 509–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiorillo, A, Sartorius, N. Mortality gap and physical comorbidity of people with severe mental disorders: the public health scandal. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2021; 20: 52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhugra, D, Malik, A, Ikkos, G. Psychiatry's Contract with Society: Concepts, Controversies and Consequences. Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. Nihilistic Times: Thinking with Max Weber. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.