doi:10.1017/S1368980011000681, published online by Cambridge University Press 4 May 2011
Our paperReference Seiluri, Lahelma, Rahkonen and Lallukka 1 mistakenly calls the inequality index described in the Statistical analyses the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). The index used is the Relative Index of Inequality (RII), which measures the magnitude of relative occupational class differences in the studied food habits. Absolute differences mentioned in the paper only refer to prevalence differences between occupational classes in Tables 2 and 3. The error does not affect the results reported or their interpretation.