Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T08:43:43.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tracy Alan Hall (2022). Velar fronting in German dialects: a study in synchronic and diachronic phonology. Number 3 in Open Germanic Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press. Pp. xx + 896.

Review products

Tracy Alan Hall (2022). Velar fronting in German dialects: a study in synchronic and diachronic phonology. Number 3 in Open Germanic Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press. Pp. xx + 896.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

David Natvig Open the ORCID record for David Natvig [Opens in a new window]
David Natvig*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Studies and Languages, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 41 , 2024 , e1
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dresher, B. Elan (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan, Piggott, Glyne L. & Rice, Keren D. (1994). Contrast in phonology: overview. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13, iii–xvii.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie (2007). The role and representation of contrast in phonological theory. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William J. (2022). Underspecification in time. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 67, 670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2018). Autosegments are not just features. In Brentari, Diane & Lee, Jackson L. (eds.) Shaping phonology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 97–118.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Sara (2011). Contrast and the evaluation of similarity: evidence from consonant harmony. Lingua 121, 1401–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43, 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natvig, David & Salmons, Joseph (2021). Connecting structure and variation in sound change. Cadernos de Linguística 2, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsammy, Michael (2015). The life cycle of phonological processes: dialectal microtypologies. Language and Linguistics Compass 9, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Orrin W. (2001). Whose German? The ach/ich alternation and related phenomena in ‘standard’ and ‘colloquial’. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Jochen (2021). The subsegmental structure of German plural allomorphy. NLLT 39, 601–656.Google Scholar