Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-67gbf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T00:40:45.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Strategies at the Governance Precipice: Transnational Lawyers in the European Union’s Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2023

Nicholas Haagensen Open the ORCID record for Nicholas Haagensen [Opens in a new window]
Nicholas Haagensen*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral research fellow, iCourts, Center of Excellence for International Courts, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do transnational lawyers valorize their expertise in a political and economic crisis? This article argues that knowing how transnational lawyers valorize their expertise is critical to understanding how transnational law evolves and affects society, especially when existing legal frameworks prove to be inadequate and novel practices must pave new paths. Using the acute phase of the Eurozone crisis between 2010 and 2012 as an empirical case, I examine how European Union (EU) legal agents constructed a framework that accommodated the uncertainty of governing a crisis while also mediating the contentious politics between EU Member States. The analysis shows that as intergovernmental bargaining dominates Eurozone crisis governance, EU legal advisors intervene to reconcile these bargains with the EU legal order using novel practices that simultaneously valorize their legal expertise. These practices in effect engender a high degree of interdependence and interconnection between the EU legal order and several intergovernmental arrangements—especially the European Stability Mechanism—leading to the creation of a unique form of EU governance: semi-intergovernmentalism. This article contributes to debates on legal globalization by empirically examining how transnational legal agents valorize their expertise through strategies directed at defending their autonomy while protecting the normative coherence of their transnational legal order: the EU.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , August 2024 , pp. 1715 - 1746
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Nicholas Haagensen would like to thank Mikael Rask Madsen, Antoine Vauchez, Leonard Seabrooke, Ramona Coman, Jacob Hasselbalch, colleagues at iCourts, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on earlier drafts. Research for this article was done under the GEM-STONES programme, which was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 722826.

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kindle.10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2005. “Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions.” Sociological Theory 23, no. 3: 245–74.10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00253.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, & Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2014. “Process Tracing. From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices.” In Process Tracing. From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, edited by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139858472.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beukers, Thomas. 2013. “The Eurozone Crisis and the Legitimacy of Differentiated Integration.” European University Institute Working Paper MWP 2013/36. San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe. 2015. “The New Intergovernmentalism and the Study of European Integration.” In The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, edited by Bickerton, Christopher J., Hodson, Dermot, and Puetter, Uwe, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence C.. 2017. Global Lawmakers. International Organizations in the Crafting of World Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316941508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc J. D.. 1992. An Invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47, no. 1: 41–76.10.1017/S0020818300004707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, William K., and Sapinski, Jean P.. 2016. “Corporate Elites and Intercorporate Networks.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by Scott, John & Carrington, Peter J., 180–95. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2010. “Legal Professionals or Political Entrepreneurs? Constitution Making as a Process of Social Construction and Political Mobilization.” International Political Sociology 4, no. 2: 107–23.10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00095.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonin, and Vauchez, Antoine. 2007. “Introduction: Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe.” Law and Social Inquiry 32, no. 1: 75–82.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00050.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. 2016. “Legitimacy Chains: Legitimation of Compliance with International Courts Across Social Fields.” Law and Society Review 50, no. 1: 154–88.10.1111/lasr.12181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Philip H. J. 2001. “Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services.” Politics 21, no. 1: 73–80.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, Paul, and Ji, Yuemei. 2012. “Mispricing of Sovereign Risk and Macroeconomic Stability in the Eurozone.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50, no. 6: 866–80.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02287.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 1995. “Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from the Competition for Transnational Business Disputes.” Law & Society Review 29, no. 1: 27–64.10.2307/3054053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars. Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Kindle.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2011. “State Politics and Legal Markets.” Comparative Sociology 10, no. 1: 38–66.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2012. “Constructing Transnational Justice.” In Lawyers and the Construction of Transnational Justice, edited by Dezalay, Yves and Bryant, G. Garth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Madsen, Mikael R.. 2012. “The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8, no. 1: 433–452.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editors at Law and Society Review. 2021. “Globalization and the Rise of Transnational Lawyers.” Law & Society Review Virtual Issue, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5893.Globalization-and-the-Rise-of-Transnational-Lawyers.Google Scholar
Eftimiades, Nicholas. 1994. Chinese Intelligence Operations. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
European Council. 2011. The European Council in 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Union. 2016. “Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.” Official Journal of the European Union 59, no. C 202: 1–366.Google Scholar
Eurostat. 2014. “Measuring Net Government Debt: Theory and Practice.” Statistical Working Paper, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 6: 781–95.10.2307/2095325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gocaj, Ledina, and Meunier, Sophie. 2013. “Time Will Tell: The EFSF, the ESM, and the Euro Crisis.” Journal of European Integration 35, no. 3: 239–53.Google Scholar
Grisel, Florian. 2017. “Competition and Cooperation in International Commercial Arbitration: The Birth of a Transnational Legal Profession.” Law and Society Review 51, no. 4: 790–824.10.1111/lasr.12295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2004. “Social Skill, the Milosevic Indictment, and the Rebirth of International Criminal Justice.” European Journal of Criminology 1, no. 4: 445–75.10.1177/1477370804045693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 1985. “Knowledge Mandates: Collective Influence by Scientific, Normative and Syncretic Professions.” The British Journal of Sociology 36, no. 3: 421–47.10.2307/590459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, Alicia. 2015. The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714958.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, Michael. 2016. “Europe’s New Transformations: How the EU Economic Constitution Changed during the Eurozone Crisis.” Common Market Law Review 53, no. 5: 1237–82.Google Scholar
Kauppi, Niilo, and Madsen, Mikael R.. 2014. “Fields of Global Governance: How Transnational Power Elites Can Make Global Governance Intelligible.” International Political Sociology 8, no. 3: 324–30.10.1111/ips.12060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, Roger D. 2011. Eurolegalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674061057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppenne, Jean-Paul. 2014. “Institutional Report.” In The XXVI FIDE Congress in Copenhagen, 2014 Congress Publications Vol. 1, edited by Neergaard, Ulla, Jacqueson, Catherine, and Danielsen, Jens H., 179–257. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.Google Scholar
Keppenne, Jean-Paul. 2020. “Economic Policy Coordination: Foundations, Structures, and Objectives.” In The EU Law of Economic and Monetary Union, edited by Edited by Amtenbrink, Fabian and Herrmann, Christoph, 787–812. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Molnár, Virág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28, no. 1: 167–95.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leino, Päivi. 2017. “The Institutional Politics of Objective Choice: Competence as a Framework for Argumentation.” In The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States. Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future, edited by Garben, Sacha & Govaere, Inge, 210–32. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen. 2014. “EMU and the EU’s Constitutional Framework.” European Law Review 39, no. 6: 753–69.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Koen, and Gutierrez-Fons, José A.. 2014. “To Say What the Law of the EU is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice.” Columbia Journal of European Law 20, no. 2: 3–61.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2015. “Boundary Work and Exchange: The Formation of a Professional Service Market.” Symbolic Interaction 38, no. 1: 1–21.10.1002/symb.137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Emirbayer, Mustafa. 2016. “Field and Ecology.” Sociological Theory 34, no. 1: 62–79.10.1177/0735275116632556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2007. “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics.” Law and Social Inquiry 32, no. 1: 137–59.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R. 2011. “The Protracted Institutionalization of the Strasbourg Court : From Legal Diplomacy to Integrationist Jurisprudence.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas & Mikael, R. Madsen, 43–60. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merino, Alberto. D. G. 2012. “Legal Developments in the Economic and Monetary Union during the Debt Crisis: The Mechanisms of Financial Assistance.” Common Market Law Review 49, no. 5: 1613–45.10.54648/COLA2012093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Tim. 2012. “Not Bailing Out … Legal Aspects of the 2010 Sovereign Debt Crisis.” In A Man for All Treaties—Liber Amicorum en l’honneur de Jean-Claude Piris, edited by Rompuy, Herman Van, 421–39. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Mudge, Stephanie L., and Vauchez, Antoine. 2012. “Building Europe on a Weak Field: Law, Economics, and Scholarly Avatars in Transnational Politics.” American Jounrnal of Sociology118, no. 2: 449–92.10.1086/666382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, Ludvig. 2021. “Rethinking Causal Explanation in Interpretive International Studies.” European Journal of International Relations 27, no. 3: 936–59.10.1177/13540661211006454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, Tommaso. 2019. “From Marx to Market: Lawyers, European Law, and the Contentious Transformation of the Port of Genoa.” Law and Society Review 53, no. 3: 851–88.10.1111/lasr.12365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2014. “Practice Tracing.” In Process Tracing. From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, by Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T., 237–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puetter, Uwe. 2012. “Europe’s Deliberative Intergovernmentalism: The Role of the Council and European Council in EU Economic Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 2: 161–78.10.1080/13501763.2011.609743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quack, Sigrid. 2007. “Legal Professionals and Transnational Law-Making: A Case of Distributed Agency.” Organization 14, no. 5: 643–66.10.1177/1350508407080313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, Hélène. 2013. “Fiscal Union in the Eurozone?” In Political, Fiscal and Banking Union in the Eurozone, edited by Allen, Franklin, Carletti, Elena, & Gray, Joanna, 107–16. Philadelphia: FIC Press.Google Scholar
Ruffert, Matthias. 2011. “The European Debt Crisis and European Union Law.” Common Market Law Review 48, no. 6: 1777–1806.10.54648/COLA2011070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrooke, Leonard. 2007. “Legitimacy Gaps in the World Economy: Explaining the Sources of the IMF’s Legitimacy Crisis.” International Politics 44, no. 2: 250–68.10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrooke, Leonard, and Nilsson, Rebecca E.. 2015. “Professional Skills in International Financial Surveillance: Assessing Change in IMF Policy Teams.” Governance 28, no. 2: 237–54.10.1111/gove.12106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrooke, Leonard, and Wigan, Duncan. 2016. “Powering Ideas through Expertise: Professionals in Global Tax Battles.” Journal of European Public Policy 23, no. 3: 357–74.10.1080/13501763.2015.1115536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeets, Sandrino, Jaschke, Alenka, and Beach, Derek. 2019. “The Role of the EU Institutions in Establishing the European Stability Mechanism: Institutional Leadership under a Veil of Intergovernmentalism.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57, no. 4: 675–91.10.1111/jcms.12842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. Kindle.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 1997. “European Integration and Supranational Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 4, no. 3: 297–317.10.1080/13501769780000011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansey, Oisín. 2007. “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40, no. 4: 765–72.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo, and Tuori, Klaus. 2014. The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107297289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. 2015. Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107326323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine, and de Witte, Bruno, editors. 2013. Lawyering Europe: European Law as a Transnational Social Field. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Kindle.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, & Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478CrossRefGoogle Scholar