Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:46:46.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food availability and advertising within food outlets around primary healthcare services in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Paula M. Horta*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Juliana de P. M. Souza
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Patrícia P. Freitas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Aline C. S. Lopes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Paula M. Horta, email [email protected]

Abstract

The consumer food environment is changing: an extensive variety of foods are now available in most markets, offering palatability, convenience and novelty. However, little is known about the availability and advertising of food items within food outlets, especially among developing countries. The present study examined these dimensions in 281 food outlets located around eighteen primary healthcare services in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, in 2013. These establishments were classified as large-chain supermarkets; specialised fruits and vegetable (F&V) markets; and local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries. Availability of F&V, availability of ultra-processed foods (UPF) and food advertising were compared across the food outlet categories by applying the χ2 test. Almost 60 % of the food outlets were specialised F&V markets, 21⋅4 % were large-chain supermarkets and 19⋅2 % were local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries. Almost 80 % contained at least eight types of fruits and vegetables, and 60 % contained UPF. Food advertisement was absent in 59⋅8 % of the food outlets, 19⋅6 % were advertising only F&V and 17⋅4 % were advertising only UPF. Higher F&V availability was noted inside specialised F&V markets and large-chain supermarkets than local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries. Advertising of F&V was more common within specialised F&V markets. However, large-chain supermarkets and local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries contained more frequent UPF food advertising isolated: 38⋅3 and 35⋅2 %, respectively. Therefore, the availability and advertising of food items within food outlets around primary healthcare services are different according to the type of food outlet.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Eating habits are influenced by a combination of individuals factors and characteristics of the food environment, such as the availability, accessibility, affordability, desirability, convenience, marketing, and the properties of food sources and products(Reference Glanz, Sallis and Saelens1Reference Swinburn, Kraak and Allender4). The International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) is a global network of public interest organisations and researchers from different countries that aims to monitor, benchmark, and support public and private sector actions to increase healthy food environments and reduce obesity, diet-related NCDs, and their related inequalities(Reference Vandevijvere and Swinburn5). INFORMAS developed modules for which the monitoring frameworks have been designed and the indicators determined, including the food retail environment module(Reference Ni Mhurchu, Vandevijvere and Waterlander6).

The food retail environment can be divided into the community food environment (the type, availability and accessibility of food outlets) and consumer food environment (the availability, prices, promotions and nutritional quality of products available within stores)(Reference Ni Mhurchu, Vandevijvere and Waterlander6,Reference Glanz, Johnson and Yaroch7) . The food retail environment is changing: an extensive variety of food and beverages are now available in most markets, offering palatability, convenience and novelty. However, at the same time, the extensive availability and advertising of such products, and especially those with unbalanced nutrient content, challenge efforts to eat healthily(Reference Filomena, Scanlin and Morland8Reference James, Seward and O'Malley10).

Within the food consumer environment, food availability refers to whether a product is present or not within a food store, and usually, food availability is associated with food advertising, i.e. only food items that are present within a food store are advertised(Reference Turner, Aggarwal and Walls11). Food advertising within food outlets involves messages on packaging or signage, shelf labelling, and product samples and is a dimension of the consumer food environment that is little investigated(Reference Pulker, Thornton and Trapp12,Reference Cairns13) . A systematic review of fifty-six primary, quantitative and observational studies, published from 2000 to 2011, concluded that none of the studies mentioned advertising within food retail outlets and the influence of marketing strategies on an individual's food choices(Reference Gustafson, Hankins and Jilcott14).

In Brazil, food advertising is recognised as an obstacle to healthy eating by the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population since it promotes unhealthy foods more frequently than healthy foods(Reference Brazil15). Several studies evaluated food advertising on Brazilian television channels(Reference Guimarães, Mais and Villamarin16,Reference Santana, Guimarães and Leite17) and on the Internet(Reference Horta, Rodrigues and Santos18), but there is little evidence about food advertising within Brazilian food outlets. To our knowledge, only one cross-sectional survey conducted in thirteen districts across the city of Sao Paulo in 2010–2011 examined this aspect of the consumer food environment. The study found that signage or promotion of ultra-processed foods (UPF) was uniformly found across stores, while fruit and vegetable (F&V) promotion was thirteen times less likely to be found at locally owned grocery stores and corner stores(Reference Duran, Lock and Latorre19).

As is prevalent worldwide, Brazil faces alarming obesity and NCDs occurrence(Reference Flores-Ortiz, Mata and Velasquez-Melendez20). Consequently, multisectoral actions that promote healthy eating and physical activity have been proposed in the country including the Health Academy Program (PAS: Programa Academia da Saúde). This initiative was created in 2011 and consists of primary healthcare services allocated in socially vulnerable regions that offer physical activity and healthy eating guidance at no cost to its participants. PAS is mainly utilised by older women and individuals who have low levels of education and are overweight(Reference Costa, Mendonça and Santos21). Since the food environment can impact individuals’ food choices(Reference Glanz, Sallis and Saelens1Reference Swinburn, Kraak and Allender4), in addition to describing the programme effectiveness in changing its users’ behaviours, it is also interesting to understand how the PAS food environment is characterised. One previous study already showed that the PAS food environment is recognised as adequate in F&V diversity and variety and excessive in UPF(Reference Freitas, Menezes and Lopes22). The present study intended to advance research on this topic and aimed to describe the advertising and the availability of food items within food outlets around PAS units.

Methods

The present study was conducted in the neighbourhoods of eighteen PAS units in Belo Horizonte from April to September 2013. The city is the sixth largest in Brazil and the eighth largest in Latin America, with an estimated population of 2 501 576(23).

In the sampling process, 42 of the 50 PAS units installed in the municipality were considered. Six units located in areas of low health vulnerability were excluded due to their reduced number in the municipality. Two additional units were excluded because they have participated in a previous intervention study. Thus, eighteen (42⋅8 %) units distributed through the nine regions of the municipality were randomly assigned, representing the total with a confidence level of 95 and 1⋅4 % error. More information about methods and sampling can be seen in a previous publication(Reference Costa, Freitas and Menezes24).

To define the food environment, establishments that traded F&V within a buffer with a 1600-m radius around each PAS unit sampled were selected. Open-air food markets were not included. The food outlets were included in the study if their owners allowed data collection. The ArcView buffer tool (Esri, Redlands, CA, USA) was chosen to create these buffers.

In total, our sample comprised 281 establishments (Fig. 1) which were classified into the following categories: large-chain supermarkets; specialised F&V markets and local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries. These food stores were classified in accordance with the following:

  • Availability of F&V: among the types most consumed in the municipality(25) – fruits: banana, orange, papaya, watermelon, apple, mango, pineapple, tangerine, grape, melon, pumpkin; vegetables: chayote, tomato, carrot, lettuce, zucchini, cabbage, beetroot, kale, okra.

  • Availability of UPF: among the types most consumed by Brazilians(25) – regular soda, fruit-flavoured drinks and juice/nectars with added sugar, cream-filled chocolate cookies and corn chips snacks.

  • Food advertising: by checking the presence of signs with nutrition information, signs or other displays that encourage the purchase or the eating of food products, and discounts(25). Food advertisement was analysed separated for only F&V advertising (any type, except tubers, roots and frozen food), only UPF advertising (regular soda, fruit-flavoured drinks and juice/nectars with added sugar, cream-filled chocolate cookies and corn chips snacks), and both F&V and UPF advertising(25).

Fig. 1. PAS (Programa Academia da Saúde) units and food stores selected.

UPF is defined as industrial formulations that result from a series of industrial processes and their ingredients often include sugar, oils, fats and salt, generally in combination, in addition to substances such as flavours, colours, emulsifiers and sweeteners(Reference Monteiro, Levy and Claro26,Reference Monteiro, Cannon and Levy27) . We chose F&V as an indicator of healthy eating because of their high nutrient density, while UPF represented an unhealthy eating indicator by the unbalanced nutrient composition of these products(Reference Monteiro, Levy and Claro26).

Food store types were compared in accordance with the availability of F&V, UPF and food advertising by applying the χ 2 test at 5 % significance level (P-value < 0⋅05). All analyses were performed with the statistical software package Stata/se version 13⋅0.

The present study was conducted according to the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Ethics Research Committee (0537.0.0203.000-11) and the Prefeitura Municipal de Belo Horizonte Ethics Research Committee (0537.0.0203.410-11A). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects/patients.

Results

The food outlets comprised mainly specialised F&V markets (59⋅4), 79⋅4 and 83⋅3 % of them contained at least eight types of F&V, respectively. UPF availability was seen in 60⋅9 % of establishments (Table 1).

Table 1. Characterisation of the food outlets around the PAS (Programa Academia da Saúde) units. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2013

F&V: fruit and vegetables; UPF: ultra-processed food.

Food advertisement was absent in 59⋅8 % of food outlets, 19⋅6 % were advertising only F&V and 17⋅4 % were advertising only UPF (Table 1).

Higher F&V availability was noted inside specialised F&V markets and large-chain supermarkets than local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries. UPF availability, on the other hand, was less common inside specialised F&V markets (38⋅3 %) (Table 1).

Food advertising was mostly absent inside specialised F&V markets (70⋅1 %). In the presence of food advertising, the promotion of only F&V was more common within specialised F&V markets. However, large-chain supermarkets and local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries contained more frequently UPF food advertising isolated: 38⋅3 and 35⋅2 %, respectively (Table 1).

Discussion

The present study described the availability and advertising of food within food outlets in the neighbourhoods of PAS in Brazil. Specialised F&V markets had a higher availability of F&V and the highest presence of only F&V advertising. Large-chain supermarkets also had high availability of F&V, although predominantly only UPF advertising. Local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries had less availability of F&V and a higher presence of UPF advertising.

Specialised F&V markets were the most common food outlets around PAS units and had higher F&V availability and advertising. Belo Horizonte, the metropolis examined in the present study, is an international reference for public policies on food and nutritional security focusing on the implementation of public establishments in deprived and low-income areas to ensure access to healthy eating, such as open-air markets and municipal markets, in addition to the promotion of population health through proper and healthy nutrition(Reference Lopes, Menezes and de Araújo28).

Supermarkets are also singled out as inductors for the consumption of F&V, for presenting a greater variety, better quality and lower cost of these foods(Reference Winkler, Lenk and Caspi29). However, they are also known for containing high UPF variety and diversity(Reference Winkler, Lenk and Caspi29). In Brazil, near 60 % of the UPF acquisition is realised in supermarkets(Reference Machado, Claro and Martins30). These facts can explain the simultaneous occurrence of high UPF availability and advertising and high F&V availability within these food outlets.

In contrast, local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries, contained an unhealthy status of food availability and advertising around the PAS units. In line with our findings, these food outlets are known as small food stores that offer an abundance of calorically high, nutrient-low foods. Although they have more autonomy to define the type of food and advertising inside these types of food outlets, in comparison to corporate- and franchise-owned stores, independent stores retailers’ face a more limited infrastructure for offering healthful food and beverages(Reference Winkler, Lenk and Caspi29).

The novelty of the present study lies in the description of food advertising inside food stores, evidence that is largely scarce in the literature(Reference Pulker, Thornton and Trapp12,Reference Gustafson, Hankins and Jilcott14) and especially in Latin America, where studies of the consumer food environment focus on evaluating and classifying food stores as healthy or unhealthy based on types of foods found in the stores(Reference Perez-Ferrer, Auchincloss and de Menezes31).

This knowledge has some significant public health implications since it identifies several public health actions. First, retailers can encourage consumers to choose products by pursuing a range of marketing and merchandising activities and, overall, they demonstrate a willingness to engage in healthy food retail and a desire for greater support from healthy food retail initiatives(Reference Houghtaling, Serrano and Kraak32,Reference Martínez Steele, Juul and Neri33) . Characterising food outlets based on the availability and advertising of food items can generate actions focusing on stimulating the retailers to improve the healthiness of their establishments. Second, the present study highlights the importance of counselling consumers about the best places to buy foods (i.e. those with higher availability of F&V). Third, to improve PAS effectiveness, actions aiming to improve the retail food environment around these services are also needed. Reducing UPF food advertising inside large-chain supermarkets and local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries and substituting it for F&V advertising such as in-store coupons or specials, in-store tastings/recipe demonstrations, and displaying labels or signs on shelves that highlight healthier options are some examples of marketing strategies that attract consumers(Reference Sutton, Caldwell and Yoshida34,Reference Moore, Pinard and Yaroch35) .

However, the present study also has several limitations. The audited food stores were located within a defined radius around PAS units; other food environments may influence the participants, although at least three times a week the participants routinely attend these services. In addition, our data are from 2013, and food environments change over time: some stores open and others close, especially in a financial crisis. In the city where the study took place, no dramatic social intervention occurred since the study was conducted and before the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the present study addresses a major aspect of the consumer food environment that is understudied and practically unknown in Brazil.

Conclusions

The availability and advertising of food items within food outlets around PAS units are different according to the type of food outlet. In general, specialised F&V markets showed higher F&V advertising. Supermarkets, despite containing high availability of F&V, presented a high occurrence of only UPF advertising. Local grocery stores, convenience stores or bakeries were the food outlets with higher UPF availability and only UPF advertising.

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) and by the Foundation for Research of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais). The present study was financed by scholarship by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and CNPq (researcher scholarship). CNPq, FAPEMIG and CAPES had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

P. M. H. made substantial contributions to data analysis and data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. J. P. M. S. made substantial contributions to data analysis and data interpretation and wrote the manuscript. P. P. F. participated in study conception and design, data analysis and critically revised the article. A. C. S. L. participated in study conception and design and critically revised the article. All authors approved the final version to be published.

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

Glanz, K, Sallis, JF, Saelens, BE, et al. (2005) Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot 19, 330333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, CE, Sorensen, G, Subramaniana, SV, et al. (2012) The local food environment and diet: a systematic review. Health Place 18, 11721187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitt, E, Gallegos, D, Comans, T, et al. (2017) Exploring the influence of local food environments on food behaviours: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Public Health Nutr 20, 23932405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinburn, BA, Kraak, VI, Allender, S, et al. (2019) The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet 393, 791846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandevijvere, S, Swinburn, BA & INFORMAS (2014) Towards global benchmarking of food environments and policies to reduce obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: design and methods for nation-wide surveys. BMJ Open 4, e005339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni Mhurchu, C, Vandevijvere, S, Waterlander, W, et al. (2013) Monitoring the availability of healthy and unhealthy foods and non-alcoholic beverages in the community and consumer retail food environments globally. Obes Rev 14, 108119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanz, K, Johnson, L, Yaroch, AL, et al. (2016) Measures of retail food store environments and sales: review and implications for healthy eating initiatives. J Nutr Educ Behav 48, 280288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filomena, S, Scanlin, K & Morland, KB (2013) Brooklyn, New York foodscape 2007–2011: a five-year analysis of stability in food retail environments. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 10, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, HJ & Wang, Y (2014) The changing food outlet distributions and local contextual factors in the United States. BMC Public Health 14, 42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, P, Seward, MW, O'Malley, AJ, et al. (2017) Changes in the food environment over time: examining 40 years of data in the Framingham heart study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14, 84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, C, Aggarwal, A, Walls, H, et al. (2018) Concepts and critical perspectives for food environment research: a global framework with implications for action in low- and middle-income countries. Global Food Security 18, 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulker, CE, Thornton, LE & Trapp, GSA (2018) What is known about consumer nutrition environments in Australia? A scoping review of the literature. Obes Sci Pract 4, 318337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cairns, G (2019) A critical review of evidence on the sociocultural impacts of food marketing and policy implications. Appetite 136, 193207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafson, A, Hankins, S & Jilcott, S (2012) Measures of the consumer food store environment: a systematic review of the evidence 2000–2011. J Community Health 37, 897911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brazil, A (2014) Ministry of Health. Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
Guimarães, JS, Mais, LA, Villamarin, FHML, et al. (2020) Ultra-processed food and beverage advertising on Brazilian television by INFORMAS benchmark. Public Health Nutr 23, 26572662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santana, MO, Guimarães, JS, Leite, FHM, et al. (2020) Analysing persuasive marketing of ultra-processed foods on Brazilian television. Int J Public Health 65, 10671077. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01456-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horta, PM, Rodrigues, FT & Santos, LC (2018) Ultra-processed food product brands on Facebook pages: highly accessed by Brazilians through their marketing techniques. Public Health Nutr 21, 15151519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duran, AC, Lock, K, Latorre, MR, et al. (2015) Evaluating the use of in-store measures in retail food stores and restaurants in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 49, 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flores-Ortiz, R, Mata, DC & Velasquez-Melendez, G (2019) Adult body weight trends in 27 urban populations of Brazil from 2006 to 2016: a population-based study. PLoS ONE 14, e0213254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, BVL, Mendonça, RD, Santos, LC, et al. (2013) City academy: a health promotion service in the healthcare network of the unified health system. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 18, 95102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freitas, P, Menezes, MC & Lopes, ACS (2019) Consumer food environment and overweight. Nutrition 66, 108114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2018). Panorama municípios brasileiros. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/belotohorizonte/panorama (accessed November 2018).Google Scholar
Costa, BVL, Freitas, PP, Menezes, MC, et al. (2018) Ambiente alimentar: validação de método de mensuração e caracterização em território com o Programa Academia da Saúde. Cad Saúde Pública 34, 00168817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2011) Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008 to 2009: Análise do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal no Brasil, 160 p. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.Google Scholar
Monteiro, CA, Levy, RB, Claro, RM, et al. (2010) A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cad Saude Publica 26, 20392049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteiro, CA, Cannon, G, Levy, R, et al. (2016) NOVA. The star shines bright. World Nutr 7, 2838.Google Scholar
Lopes, ACS, Menezes, MC & de Araújo, ML (2017) Food environment and access to fruits and vegetables: “a metropolis into perspective”. Saude Soc 26, 764773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, MR, Lenk, KM, Caspi, C, et al. (2019) Variation in the food environment of small and non-traditional stores across racial segregation and corporate status. Public Health Nutr 22, 16241634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, PP, Claro, RM, Martins, APB, et al. (2018) Is food store type associated with the consumption of ultra-processed food and drink products in Brazil? Public Health Nutr 21, 201209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perez-Ferrer, C, Auchincloss, AH, de Menezes, MC, et al. (2019) The food environment in Latin America: a systematic review with a focus on environments relevant to obesity and related chronic diseases. Public Health Nutr 22, 34473464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghtaling, B, Serrano, EL, Kraak, VI, et al. (2019) A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability or willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005–2017. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 16, 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez Steele, E, Juul, F, Neri, D, et al. (2019) Dietary share of ultra-processed foods and metabolic syndrome in the US adult population. Prev Med 125, 4048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, K, Caldwell, J, Yoshida, S, et al. (2019) Healthy food marketing and purchases of fruits and vegetables in large grocery stores. Prev Med Rep 14, 100861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, LV, Pinard, CA & Yaroch, AL (2016) Features in grocery stores that motivate shoppers to buy healthier foods, ConsumerStyles 2014. J Community Health 41, 812817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. PAS (Programa Academia da Saúde) units and food stores selected.

Figure 1

Table 1. Characterisation of the food outlets around the PAS (Programa Academia da Saúde) units. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2013